This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Urinary bladder cancer, pathologically presented mainly as transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) (1), is one of the most common malignancies in the world (2). Once diagnosed as a muscle-invasive type, the 5-year survival and freedom from relapse rates under conservative multimodality therapies were 54 and 42%, respectively (3). Chemotherapy with standard regimen methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (MVAC) or more tolerable regimen GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin) for advanced or metastatic bladder cancer has demonstrated poor response (4). Currently, due to cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, gemcitabine is the chief strategy for bladder cancer therapy (5). However, fair prognosis was noted in several trials of gemcitabine plus other anti-neoplastic drugs (6,7). Gemcitabine resistance in TCC cells has been noted (8).

Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, has been shown to be a diagnostic biomarker and prognostic parameter of bladder cancer (9). Sepantronium bromide, a small molecule also known as YM155, directly binds to the transcription factor ILF3/NF110 or disrupts ILF3/p54nrb complex to inhibit the activity of survivin gene promoter (10,11). YM155 has been demonstrated to inhibit the progression of certain neoplasms, such as prostate (10,12) and lung cancer (13,14). In the present study, we demonstrated that gemcitabine-resistant human TCC BFTC905 cells were sensitive to YM155 at very low concentrations, and the anti-neoplastic effects were more potent than cisplatin and/or gemcitabine. Notably, YM155 did not elicit cytotoxic effects on primary human urothelial cells. YM155 may be a suitable candidate for TCC that is difficult to treat in the future.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

BFTC905 (15), BFTC909 (15), T24 and TSGH8301 TCC cell lines were maintained as previously described (16,17). Primary human urothelial cells (HUCs) were also used and cultured in the special medium as suggested (#4312) (both from ScienCell Research Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

MTT cytotoxicity assay

Procedures were followed as previously described (16,17). YM155 (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA), cisplatin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), sirolimus and everolimus (both from LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA) were dissolved in DMSO (J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Gemcitabine and 3-methyladenine (3-MA) (both from Sigma) were dissolved in distilled water.

Proliferation assay

For proliferation detection, the growth of 1×105 TCC cells or HUCs was determined in a 10 cm dish with complete medium plus YM155 or DMSO at 0 h. After 24 h, the medium was removed and the cells were treated as before. Cell counts were calculated by a hemocytometer 48 h later.

Cell cycle analysis

BFTC905 cells were plated at a density of 2×105 cells/60-mm petri dish. After treatment, the surfactant and the dead cells were removed. Only the cell cycle changes in the viable cells were analyzed. Procedures using flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) as previously described were followed (18).

Immunofluorescent staining

Hoechst 33342 (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) staining was used for nuclei labeling. Expression of phospho-histone H2AX (#9719) and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP (#9418); both from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA] were measured by the fluorescent intensity in flow cytometry. Cyto-ID® Autophagy Detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences) was used for staining of autophagic vesicles. For semi-quantitation of condensed nuclei, cells were chosen randomly from 10 fields and photographed by Olympus fluorescence microscope BX43 (x400) plus Panasonic DMC-G1 digital camera.

Western blot analysis

Conventional procedures were followed as previously described (16). Primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., with anti-survivin (#2808), anti-LC3B (#2775), cell cycle regulation (#9932) and cell cycle/checkpoint antibody sampler kits (#9917), Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) with anti-securin (ab3305), GeneTex, (Irvine, CA, USA) with anti-bcl2 (GTX127958), anti-TCTP (GTX63597), anti-cyclin A1 (GXT103042), anti-cyclin B1 (GTX100911), anti-cyclin D1 (GTX112874), cyclin E1 (GTX103045) Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA) with anti-Ki67 (sc-15402), α-tubulin (sc-8305) and actin (sc-1616). Expression of α-tubulin or actin was used as the internal standard.

DNA fragment assay

The Cell Death Detection ELISAplus (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) assay kit was used to differentiate apoptotic or necrotic condition of 2×104 BFTC905 cells after YM155 treatment. Procedures were followed as previously described (19).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means ± SEM (standard error of mean) and analyzed by Student's t-test or two-way ANOVA based on individual data. In all cases, p<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference and is labeled by * in the figures. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.005.

Results

Cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in TCC cells

Fig. 1 shows that up to 500 nM of gemcitabine did not exert a significant cytotoxic effect on the viability of BFTC905 cells after 48-h treatment (n=5). Even after 1 μM gemcitabine treatment, a moderate but significant reduction of 29.5% cell viability of BFTC905 cells was found (p<0.001 vs. vehicle control). BFTC909 cells were also relatively resistant to gemcitabine, but the viability difference between BFTC905 and BFTC909 cells still reached statistical significance (two-way ANOVA, p=0.03). The viability of T24 and TSGH8301 cells was significantly lower than BFTC905 cells after YM155 treatment (two-way ANOVA, both p<0.001). Thus, among these 4 cell lines examined, BFTC905 was chosen as a model to further investigate the new therapy for gemcitabine-resistant bladder cancer.

Figure 1 Cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in TCC cells. The viability of BFTC905, T24, TSGH8301 and BFTC909 cells was measured by MTT assay 48 h after treatment with gemcitabine. The viability ratio was the ratio of the OD value from the drug-treated sample divided by that of the control sample. *1p<0.05 between the difference in viability of BFTC905 cells after 1,000 nM gemcitabine and control. ***p<0.005. TCC, transitional cell carcinoma.

Cytotoxicity of YM155 in TCC and primary human urothelial cells

After 48-h treatment, YM155 elicited potent cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner in TCC cells (n=3; Fig. 2A). The IC50s for 4 TCC cell lines were all within 20 nM. No significant difference of YM155-induced cytotoxicity between BFTC905 and BFTC909 cells was noted (two-way ANOVA, p=0.28), but YM155 significantly exhibited more potent cytotoxic effects on T24 and TSGH8301 than BFTC905 cells (two-way ANOVA, p<0.001). Within 20–50 nM YM155, the viability between BFTC905 and T24 or TSGH8301 reached statistically significant difference. The viability of HUCs was not altered after YM155 treatment. Expression of survivin was not detected in HUCs, and the expression of survivin in BFTC905 cells served as a positive control (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2 Cytotoxicity of YM155 in TCC cells. (A) The viability of BFTC905, T24, TSGH8301 and BFTC909 cells was measured by MTT assay 48 h after treatment with YM155. The viability ratio was the ratio of the OD value from the drug-treated sample divided by that of the control sample. *p<0.05 between the difference in viability of TCC cells after YM155 treatment and control. (B) Western blotting of survivin expression in BFTC905 and human urothelial cells (HUCs). Expression of α-tubulin was used as an internal standard. TCC, transitional cell carcinoma.

Cytotoxicity of YM155 plus cisplatin and/or gemcitabine in BFTC905 cells

Next, we evaluated if synergistic or additive cytotoxic effects may be observed when gemcitabine-resistant BFTC905 cells are treated with YM155 plus cisplatin and/or gemcitabine for 48 h (n=3; Fig. 3). Cisplatin at 2.5 μM plus gemcitabine at 100 nM decreased the viability of BFTC905 cells by 13.1% (86.9±2.4% of viability when compared to control; p=0.005). When the corresponding concentrations of cisplatin and/or gemcitabine were combined with 20 nM YM155, the cytotoxicities of these combinations were mainly attributed to YM155 (Fig. 3) as 20 nM YM155 alone caused ~45% reduction in the viability of BFTC905 (Fig. 2). Compared to control, any YM155 based regimen showed very potent cytotoxicity on BFTC905 cells (p<0.001). No synergistic or additive cytotoxicities in BFTC905 cells were observed when YM155 was combined with cisplatin and/or gemcitabine. YM155 alone provided marked efficacy in treating gemcitabine-resistant TCC cells in vitro.

Figure 3 Cytotoxicity of cisplatin and/or gemcitabine plus YM155 in TCC cells. The viability of BFTC905 cells was measured by MTT assay 48 h after treatment with cisplatin and/or gemcitabine plus YM155. The viability ratio was the ratio of the OD value from the drug-treated sample divided by that of the control sample. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.005, between the difference in viability of BFTC905 cells after treatments and control. TCC, transitional cell carcinoma.

YM155 inhibits the proliferation of TCC cells

Daily treatment with 20 nM YM155 for 2 days significantly inhibited the proliferation of all TCC cell lines (Fig. 4, n=3, all p<0.001). T24 cells were the fastest growing (from 1×105 to 9.4×105), and the most sensitive to inhibition by YM155 (from 9.4×105 to 3.8×104). The slowest growth among the 4 cell lines was TSGH8301 (from 1×105 to 4.1×105) but also the least suppression of proliferation by YM155 (from 4.1×105 to 1.3×105). The proliferation of gemcitabine-resistant BFTC905 and BFTC909 cells were also clearly inhibited (from 7.4×105 to 7.7×104 and from 6.8×105 to 9.3×104, respectively). The proliferation of HUCs was not affected following YM155 treatment.

Figure 4 Anti-proliferative effect of YM155 in TCC cells and HUCs. Cell counts of T24, TSGH8301, BFTC905, BFTC909 cells as well as HUCs were calculated 48 h after 20 nM YM155 treatment once daily. ***p<0.005 between the difference in cell counts of TCC cells after YM155 treatment and control. TCC, transitional cell carcinoma; HUCs, human urothelial cells.

YM155 elicits quiescence in BFTC905 cells after YM155 treatment

After 48-h treatment, a significant accumulation in G0/G1 phase (68.1±1.1 vs. 59.4±0.3% after YM155 vs. DMSO treatment; n=3, p=0.002) was observed (Fig. 5A). The expression of cell cycle related proteins is shown in Fig. 5B and C. After 48-h treatment, cyclin A/B/D1, CDK4/6, phospho-CDC2 and phospho-CDK2 were significantly decreased. However, cyclin E, p15INK4B and p21 did not show obvious changes. By contrast, the expression of p27kip1 was increased at 48 h after treatment. These results indicated that no stasis or arrest was found in all proliferation phases of cell cycle, including G1, S and G2/M. We hypothesized that BFTC905 cells were arrested in the G0 phase after YM155 treatment. As shown in Fig. 5D, the expression of proliferation marker Ki-67 was significantly decreased 48 h after YM155 treatment, indicating that YM155 induced quiescence in BFTC905 cells.

Figure 5 Changes of cell cycle in BFTC905 cells after YM155 treatment. (A) Ratios of cell cycle changes were analyzed by flow cytometry 48 h after YM155 treatment. (B and C) Representative western blotting of survivin expression was examined within 48 h after treatment with 20 nM YM155. Experiments were repeated 3 times with similar results. The mean intensity ratios shown on the blots were calculated by dividing the intensity of targeted proteins treated with YM155 to control. (D) Representative western blotting of Ki-67 expression was examined 24 and 48 h after treatment with 20 nM YM155. Quantitative comparison of Ki-67 expression is shown in the right hand bar graph. *p<0.05 and ***p<0.005.

YM155 induces apoptosis in BFTC905 cells

Low basal levels of DNA fragments bound by anti-histone plus anti-DNA antibodies were detected in the culture medium of BFTC905 cells 24 and 48 h after 20 nM YM155 treatment. A significant amount of cytoplasmic DNA fragments was detected 24 h after 20 nM YM155 treatment when compared to control (n=3, p=0.04; Fig. 6A). By contrast, a significant amount of cytoplasmic DNA fragments was detected 48 h following YM155 treatment (n=3, p=0.002; Fig. 6B). We also examined the morphology of nuclei 24 and 48 h after 20 nM YM155 treatment using Hoechst 33342 staining. Significantly more nuclear condensation (yellow arrow) in BFTC905 cells was observed after 48-h treatment (n=10, p<0.001; Fig. 6C). Semi-quantitation of the immunofluorescent intensity by flow cytometry revealed significantly increased expression of DNA double-strain break marker phospho-histone H2AX (n=3, p=0.02; Fig. 6D) and cleaved PARP (n=3, p=0.02; Fig. 6E) 48 h after treatment with 20 nM YM155. These results indicated that YM155 induced apoptosis of gemcitabine-resistant TCC cells.

Figure 6 Apoptosis in BFTC905 cells after YM155 treatment. After treatment with 20 nM YM155 for (A) 24 h and (B) 48 h, the supernatants of both the culture medium and the cytoplasmic fraction of BFTC905 cells were collected. Increased expression of DNA fragments in the medium indicates necrosis due to membrane rupture, while increased expression in the cytoplasm alone indicates apoptosis. (C) Nuclear condensation (yellow arrow) in BFTC905 cells was observed after 48-h treatment with YM155 by Hoechst 33342 staining. Quantitative comparison of apoptotic cells is shown in the right hand bar graph. Immunofluorescent intensity of (D) phospho-histone H2AX and (E) cleaved PARP after 48-h YM155 treatment, measured by flow cytometry. Immunofluorescent distribution in solid and dash lines indicates treatment with YM155 and control, respectively. *p<0.05 and ***p<0.005.

YM155 decreases the expression of survivin, securin and bcl-2 in BFTC905 cells

Apart from survivin, securin and bcl-2 are also correlated with the histological or clinical grading of bladder cancer (20–22). Treatment with 1 μM gemcitabine for 48 h did not significantly alter the expression of survivin but it increased the expression of securin and bcl-2 in BFTC905 cells (both p=0.03, n=3; Fig. 7A). These data may explain the mechanism of gemcitabine resistance in BFTC905 cells. Expressions of survivin, securin and bcl-2 in BFTC905 cells were not significantly altered after 24-h treatment with 20 nM YM155. After 48-h treatment with 20 nM YM155, not only survivin but also securin and bcl-2 were significantly downregulated (p=0.006, 0.003 and 0.03, respectively, n=3; Fig. 7B). Translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) can prevent apoptosis of cells (23,24). No significant changes of TCTP expression were observed following YM155 treatment.

Figure 7 Expression of survivin, securin, bcl-2 and TCTP in BFTC905 cells after gemcitabine or YM155 treatment. (A) Representative western blotting of survivin, securin and bcl-2 expression were examined 48 h after treatment with 1 μM gemcitabine. (B) Representative western blotting of survivin, securin, bcl-2 and TCTP expression were examined 24 and 48 h after treatment with 20 nM YM155. Quantitative comparison of the expression is shown in the right hand figures. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01. TCTP, translationally controlled tumor protein.

YM155 induces autophagy in BFTC905 cells

After 20 nM YM155 treatment, autophagic vacuoles detected by Cyto-ID® dye were observed in BFTC905 cells (Fig. 8A). Further flow cytometric analysis showed a significant autophagic flux after YM155 treatment (Fig. 8B). To determine the roles of autophagy in YM155-induced BFTC905 cell death, autophagy inhibitor 3-MA and autophagy inducers sirolimus and everolimus, known as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, were administered additionally with YM155. 3-MA reversed YM155-induced cytotoxicity (p=0.04, n=6) while sirolimus and everolimus did not significantly alter YM155-induced cytotoxicity (Fig. 8C). LC3B-II, a marker of autophagy converted from LC3B-I, was also significantly more abundant in BFTC905 cells after 20 nM YM155 treatment (p=0.01, n=3; Fig. 8D). Concomitantly administered with YM155, 3-MA significantly decreased the expression of LC3B-II (p=0.03, n=3) while sirolimus and everolimus did not augment its expression (Fig. 8D).

Figure 8 Autophagy in BFTC905 cells after YM155 treatment. (A) Autophagic vacuoles detected by Cyto-ID® dye in the cytoplasm of BFTC905 cells after 20 nM YM155 treatment. (B) Autophagic flux by Cyto-ID dye was measured by flow cytometry. Immunofluorescent distribution in solid and dash lines represents treatment with YM155 and control, respectively. (C) The viability of BFTC905 cells was measured by MTT assay 48 h after treatment with YM155 plus autophagy inhibitor 3-MA, or autophagy inducers sirolimus/everolimus. (D) Representative western blotting of LC3B expression was examined 24 and 48 h after treatment with YM155 plus 3-MA or sirolimus/everolimus. Quantitative comparison of LC3B-II expression is shown in the right hand bar graph. *p<0.05. 3-MA, 3-methyladenine.

Discussion

Our results showed that novel survivin inhibitor, YM155, elicited cytotoxicity in TCC cells including gemcitabine-resistant cell line BFTC905. Moreover, no cytotoxic effect was noted in normal human epithelial cells. We demonstrated that treatment with a single agent YM155 already provided marked therapeutic effects through multiple mechanisms. Few phase I/II clinical trials of YM155 for cancer therapies have been reported and it was well tolerated by patients with minimal adverse effects such as fatigue and nausea (25). Thus, YM155 may offer a new hope for refractory bladder cancer patients.

Very low IC50s of gemcitabine (usually <100 nM) have been reported for many TCC cell lines (26,27) except one gemcitabine-resistant TCC cell line UM-UC-3R (8). IC50s of gemcitabine for T24 and TSGH8301 cells in our experiments were >100 nM, and we suppose the variation may result from different cytotoxic assays and protocols. However, the viability of T24 and TSGH8301 cells was indeed much lower than BFTC905 cells after gemcitabine treatment. Gemcitabine upregulated survivin expression in pancreatic cancer MiaPaCa-2 cells, but this phenomenon was not observed in BFTC905 cells (28). Securin, the product of pituitary tumor-transforming gene (PTTG) (29), has been reported to mediate gefitinib resistance in cancer cells (30). Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic protein, has also been reported to mediate cisplatin resistance in urothelial carcinoma cells (31). In the present investigation, upregulation of securin and bcl-2 in BFTC905 cells may be a compensatory mechanism for gemcitabine resistance. We have also reported that only BFTC905 but not T24 and TSGH8301 xenografts successfully grew in SCID mice with less cell loading (32). Collectively, the above observations indicate that BFTC905 is the first choice of TCC cell lines for investigating the new therapy for gemcitabine-resistant bladder cancer.

Our results showed that YM155 caused potent cytotoxicity in TCC cells, including gemcitabine-resistant ones. It may result from survivin similarly expressed in these cell lines (33). However, other different characteristics that exist among BFTC905 and other high grade TCC cell lines should be further investigated. Since survivin is not expressed in HUCs, it is reasonable that YM155 did not elicit cytotoxic effects in HUCs. YM155 acting on bladder cancer cells without affecting normal urothelium would be the best choice for targeted therapy. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is the standard chemotherapy regimen for bladder cancer, but fair cytotoxic effect was noted in BFTC905 cells. YM155 has been reported to reverse cisplatin resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells (34). Thus, we also tested the cytotoxic effects of YM155 combined with cisplatin, gemcitabine, or both. YM155 has been reported to potentiate the therapeutic effects of many chemotherapy or targeted-therapy agents (13,14,35–39). However, our results demonstrated that YM155 alone exerted potent cytotoxicity in BFTC905 cells, and addition of cisplatin and/or gemcitabine to YM155 did not elicit synergistic or additive effects. The present study also confirmed that survivin plays a key role in the survival of TCC cells. YM155 may be a suitable option for refractory bladder cancer therapy.

Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family, is abundantly expressed in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle to regulate mitosis (40). Downregulation of survivin by siRNA inhibited bladder cancer growth with G2/M phase arrest (41). However, survivin inhibitor YM155 caused variable cell cycle arrest and even a lack of changes in cell cycles were found in previous reports. In malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cells, YM155 caused G2/M cell cycle arrest (42). Cheng et al demonstrated a slight S phase stasis in PC3 prostate cancer cells after 24- and 48-h YM155 treatment (43). Since cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry only represents the proportional changes in each phase after treatment, we further examined the specific cell cycle related proteins. The roles of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases and related molecules in cancer cell cycles have been well established (44,45). Downregulation of G2/M phase marker cyclin B and phospho-CDC2 in the present study indicated no G/M arrest. Downregulation of cyclin A, which is expressed in S phase, indicated no S phase arrest. CDK2 is expressed in late G1 and S phase, therefore a decrease in CDK2 expression indicated no cell cycle stasis in late G1 and S phase. Cyclin D1 and CDK4/6 are expressed in G1 phase before R point, while cyclin E is expressed in late G1 phase after R point. Expression of these markers was all decreased after YM155 treatment; thus, YM155 did not induce G1 phase arrest. Due to the increased ratio of G0/G1 phase without G1 arrest, YM155 induced G0 phase stasis, known as quiescence, was substantiated. Our results are consistent with those of Arora et al who demonstrated the early inhibition of DNA synthesis in Merkel cell carcinoma by YM155 (46). After 48-h YM155 treatment, the increased expression of p27kip1, a potent inhibitor of cyclin-CDK complex formation, supported this idea. Ki-67 protein is present in the nucleus during all active phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2 and mitotic phase) but absent from quiescent cells (G0), so Ki-67 is the most referenced marker for cellular proliferation (47,48). In our results, expression of Ki-67 after 48-h YM155 treatment was much lower than control. Thus, we found the novel effect of YM155 in promoting quiescence in gemcitabine-resistant TCC cells.

Survivin plays important roles in anti-apoptosis, so any method to decrease the expression of survivin in bladder cancer cells should elicit apoptosis (49,50). In this regard, survivin inhibitor YM155 promoted apoptosis of cancer cells (19,51), and we also observed that YM155 induced apoptosis in TCC cells with enhanced expression of cleaved PARP and phospho-histone γ-H2AX. PARP is involved in the repair of single-strand DNA nicks, but cleaved PARP facilitates cellular disassembly and promotes ongoing apoptosis (52). Enhanced expression of cleaved PARP after YM155 treatment was also noted in SU-DHL-4 large-B cell lymphoma, triple-negative breast cancer and adult T-cell leukemia cells (37,39,53). γ-H2AX is the DNA double-strand break marker and γ-H2AX dephosphorylation facilitates DNA double-strand break repair (54,55). Expression of phospho-γ-H2AX varied after YM155 treatment, for instance, an increase in non-small cell lung cancer Calu6 cells but no changes in H460 cells were reported (35). Similarly, expression of bcl-2 in A375 melanoma cells was not altered after YM155 treatment (38), but marked inhibition of bcl-2 expression by survivin siRNA in human renal clear cell carcinoma 786-O cells, similar to our results, was observed (56). It may result from the characteristics of individual cell lines. Securin was found as an inhibitor of premature sister chromatid separation in nuclei (57). In our previous report, securin was overexpressed in human TCC specimens when compared to normal urothelium (22). Chao and Liu also demonstrated that survivin siRNA significantly induced apoptosis and decreased the levels of securin in A549 cells (58). We have also reported YM155-induced apoptosis with securin suppression in glioblastoma multiforme cells (32). Overexpression of TCTP was observed in many malignancies (12), but whether TCTP is expressed in bladder cancer has not be determined. Our results demonstrated the first observation of TCTP expression in TCC cells. Expression of TCTP in the rat urothelium has been reported (59). No changes in TCTP expression after YM155 treatment suggest that the function of urothelium may not be altered to induce adverse effects. The detailed signaling among survivin, securin and bcl-2 in TCC should be further investigated.

Survivin is also involved in autophagy. Survivin controls autophagosome formation and protects cancer cells from autophagic death, known as type II cell death, by inhibiting the expression of LC3II (60). In prostate cancer cells, YM155 induced autophagy and autophagy inhibitor 3-MA attenuated YM155-induced apoptosis (12). In that study, autophagy induced by YM155 played a pro-apoptotic role. However, autophagy is a double-edged sword (61). Autophagy is also important for survival in tumor cells by overcoming hypoxia and a shortage of nutrients. Therefore, we evaluated the role of YM155-induced autophagy in BFTC905 cells. As expected, 3-MA diminished YM155-induced cytotoxicity by decreasing the expression of LC3B-II. Sirolimus and everolimus, however, did not elicit additive cytotoxic effects with YM155 in BFTC905 cells. Compared to treatment with YM155 alone, expression of LC3B-II was not increased after YM155 plus mTOR inhibitors, indicating that YM155 per se is a strong activator of LC3B-II. YM155-induced autophagy promoted the death of BFTC905 cells.

In conclusion, low concentrations of YM155 induced quiescence, apoptosis, and autophagy in gemcitabine-resistant human TCC cells without causing cytotoxicity in normal human urothelium. YM155 may become a new candidate for advanced or metastatic bladder cancer therapy.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by a grant-in-aid from Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan.

References