[Corrigendum] Downregulation of nucleolar and spindle‑associated protein 1 expression suppresses cell migration, proliferation and invasion in renal cell carcinoma
Affiliations: Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, P.R. China, Department of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China, Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China, Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510280, P.R. China, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, P.R. China, Department of Urology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518037, P.R. China
- Published online on: November 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2020.7875
- Pages: 793-793
Copyright : © Fang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
This article is mentioned in:
Oncol Rep 36: [Related article:] 1506-1516, 2016; DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4955
Following the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that Fig. 5A was published with certain errors; essentially, the authors needed to perform further experiments to validate certain of their results, and the Blank and si-NC control data in Fig. 5A were included from an incorrect set of experiments (the intended si-NUSAP1 experimental data from the flow cytometric analyses, however, were presented correctly in the published Figure).
Downregulation of NUSAP1 expression induces the apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of RCC cells. (A) Apoptosis assay indicated that transfection with si-NUSAP1 resulted in a significant increase in apoptosis in the 786-O and A704 cells. (B) According to flow cytometric analysis, downregulation of NUSAP1 expression resulted in a significant increase in the cell rate of G2/M phase in 786-O and A704 cells; *P<0.05, **P<0.001.
The corrected version of Fig. 5, featuring the panels for the Blank and si-NC control data in Fig. 5A from the same set of experiments, is shown opposite. The authors have confirmed that the errors associated with this figure did not have any significant impact on either the results or the conclusions reported in this study, and are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum. Furthermore, they apologize to the readership of the Journal for any inconvenience caused.