|
1
|
American Cancer Society, . Cancer Facts
and Figures, 2018. 2018, https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2018/cancer-facts-and-figures-2018.pdf
|
|
2
|
Liu Y, Liu H, Bai X, Ye Z, Sun H, Bai R
and Wang D: Differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic
lymph-nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer using
diffusion-weighted imaging. Gynecol Oncol. 122:19–24. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Klerkx W, Veldhuis W, Spijkerboer A, van
den Bosch MA, Mali WP, Heintz AP, Bipat S, Sie-Go DM, van der
Velden J, Schreuder HW, et al: The value of 3.0Tesla
diffusion-weighted MRI for pelvic nodal staging in patients with
early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer. 48:3414–3421. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Exner M, Kühn A, Stumpp P, Höckel M, Horn
LC, Kahn T and Brandmaier P: Value diffusion-wheighted MRI in
diagnosis of uterine cervical cancer: A prosprctive study
evaluating the benefits of DWI compared to convencional MR
sequences in a 3T environment. Acta Radiol. 57:869–877. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Seber T, Caglar E, Uglar T, Karaman N,
Aktas E and Aribas BK: Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted
magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of benign and malignent
lhymh nodes in different regions of the body. Clin Imaging.
39:856–862. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Vandecaveye V, Dresen R and De Keyser F:
Novel imaging techiniques in gynecological cancer. Curr Opin Oncol.
29:335–342. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F,
Tanikake M, Narabayashi I and Yamada T: Detection and evaluation of
pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignances using
body diffusion-wheighted maginetic resonance imaging. J Compute
Assist Tomogr. 32:764–768. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
He XQ and Wei LN: Diagnostic value of
lymph node metastasis by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance
imaging in cervical cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 12:77–83. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Lin G, Ho KC, Wang JJ, Ng KK, Wai YY, Chen
YT, Chang CJ, Ng SH, Lai CH and Yen TC: Detection of lymph node
metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted
magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 28:128–135.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Fenell J, Scholber J, Grosu AL,
Volegova-Neher N, Henne K, Langer M, Meyer PT, Gitsch G and Bartl
N: MRI and FDG-PET/CT imaging in gynecological malignances: The
radiation oncology perspective. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
60:117–123
|
|
11
|
Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH and
Metreweli C: Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamc MR imaging
in the evaluation of pelvic lyhmph nodes in cervical carcinoma. ARJ
Am J Roentgenol. 175:759–766. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Jung W, Park KR, Lee KJ, Kim K, Lee J,
Jeong S, Kim YJ, Kim J, Yoon HJ, Kang BC, et al: Value of imaging
study in predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis of uterine
cervical cancer. Radiat Oncol J. 35:340–348. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Bathala N, Berek J, Fredes M, Denny LA,
Grenman S, Karunaratne K, Kehoe ST, Konishi I, Olawaiye AB, Prat J,
et al: Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Ginecol Obstet:.
145:129–135. 2019.
|
|
14
|
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J,
Gonzalez N and Conde JG: Research electronic data capture
(REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for
providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed
Inform. 42:377–381. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Shen G, Zhou H, Jia Z and Deng H:
Diagnostic performance of difussion-wietihged MRI for detection of
pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 88:201500632015.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Lucas R, Dias J and Cunha TM: Added value
of diffusion-wheighted MRI in detection of cervical cancer
recurrance: Comparison with morfological and dynamic
contrast-enanced MRI sequences. Diagn Interv Radiol. 21:368–375.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Chen YB, Liao J, Xie R, Chen GL and Chen
G: Discrimination of metastatic from hyperplastic pelvic lymph
nodes in patients with cervical cancer by diffusion-weighted
magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 36:102–109. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Liu B, Gao S and Li S: A Comprehensive
Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission tomography or positron
emission Tomography/CT, and diffusion weighted Imaging-MRI for
detecting the lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical
cancer: A meta-analysis based on 67 studies. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
82:209–222. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Chou HH, Chang TC, Yen TC, Ng KK, Hsueh S,
Ma SY, Chang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, Wu TI, et al: Low value of
[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in
primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical
hysterectomy. J Clin Oncol. 24:123–128. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Driscoll DO, Halpenny D, Jhonston C,
Sheehy N and Keogan M: 18-F-FDG-PET-CT is of limited value in
primary staging of early stage cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging.
40:127–133. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Schieda N, Malone SC, Al Dandan O,
Ramchandani P and Siegelman ES: Multi-modality organ-based approach
to expected imaging findings, complications and recurrent tumour in
the genitourinary tract after radiotherapy. Insights Imaging.
5:25–40. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Vincens E, Balleyguier C, Rey A, Uzan C,
Zareski E, Gouy S, Pautier P, Duvillard P, Haie-Meder C and Morice
P: Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting residual
disease in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma
with chemoradiation therapy: Correlation of radiologic findings
with surgicopathologic results. Cancer. 113:2158–2165. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Levy A, Caramella C, Chargari C, Medjhoul
A, Rey A, Zareski E, Boulet B, Bidault F, Dromain C and Balleyguier
C: Accuracy of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC
mapping in the evaluation of residual cervical carcinoma after
radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 123:110–115. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Harry VN, Semple SI, Gilbert FJ and Parkin
DE: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the early
detection of response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer. Gynecol
Oncol. 111:213–220. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Song J, Hu Q, Huang J, Ma Z and Chen T:
Combining tumor size and diffusion-weighted imaging to diagnose
normal-sized metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancers.
Acta Radiol. 60:388–395. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Bourgiot C, Chatoupis K and Moulopoulos L:
Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical
cancer. World J Radiol. 8:342–354. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Hawnaur JM, Carrington BM, Hunter RD and
Isherwood I: Treatment response in carcinoma of the uterine cervix:
Evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Tumor Response Monitoring
and Treatment Planning. Breit A, Heuck A, Lukas P, Kneschaurek P
and Mayr M: Springer; Heidelberg: 1992, View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Choi HJ, Kim SH, Seo SS, Kang S, Lee S,
Kim JY, Kim YH, Lee JS, Chung HH, Lee JH and Park SY: MRI for
pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. Am J
Roentgenol. 187:W538–W543. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Liyanage SH, Roberts CA and Rockall AG:
MRI and PET scans for primary staging and detection of cervical
cancer recurrance. Womens Health (Lond). 6:251–269. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Li K, Sun H and Guo Q: Combinative
evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic
lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A
multiparametric PET-CT study. Eur J Radiol. 113:153–157. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Lin AJ, Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA,
Markovina S, Schwarz J, Thaker PH, Mutch DG, Powell MA and Grigsby
PW: Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and
para-aortic nodal metastasis with
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in
stage IB cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 29:1351–1354. 2019.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Yu W, Kou C, Bai W, Yu X, Duan R, Zhu B,
Li Y, Hua W, Ren X and Yang Y: The diagnostic performance of PET/CT
scans for the detection of para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes in
patients with cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One.
14:e02200802019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
