|
1
|
United States Census Bureau. City of
Columbia. QuickFacts-Columbia City, South Carolina. 2021.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/columbiacitysouthcarolina.
Accessed November 19, 2021.
|
|
2
|
Carlberg M, Hedendahl L, Koppel T and
Hardell L: High ambient radiofrequency radiation in Stockholm city,
Sweden. Oncol Lett. 17:1777–1783. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hedendahl LK,
Koppel T and Ahonen M: Environmental radiofrequency radiation at
the Järntorget Square in Stockholm Old Town, Sweden in May, 2018
compared with results on brain and heart tumour risks in rats
exposed to 1.8 GHz base station environmental emissions. World Acad
Sci J. 1:47–54. 2019.
|
|
4
|
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Koppel T and
Hedendahl L: High radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Old Town:
An exposimeter study including the Royal Castle, Supreme Court,
three major squares and the Swedish Parliament. Mol Clin Oncol.
6:462–476. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Koppel T, Ahonen M, Carlberg M, Hedendahl
LK and Hardell L: Radiofrequency radiation from nearby mobile phone
base stations-a case comparison of one low and one high exposure
apartment. Oncol Lett. 18:5383–5391. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Hedendahl LK, Carlberg M, Koppel T and
Hardell L: Measurements of radiofrequency radiation with a
body-borne exposimeter in Swedish schools with Wi-Fi. Front Public
Health. 5(279)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Hardell L, Koppel T, Carlberg M, Ahonen M
and Hedendahl L: Radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Central
Railway Station in Sweden and some medical aspects on public
exposure to RF fields. Int J Oncol. 49:1315–1324. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Jalilian H, Eeftens M, Ziaei M and Röösli
M: Public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in
everyday microenvironments: An updated systematic review for
Europe. Environ Res. 176(108517)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Sagar S, Dongus S, Schoeni A, Roser K,
Eeftens M, Struchen B, Foerster M, Meier N, Adem S and Röösli M:
Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday
microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review. J Expo
Sci Environ Epidemiol. 28:147–160. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Viel FJ, Clerc S, Barrera C, Rymzhanova R,
Moissonnier M and Cardis E: Residential exposure to radiofrequency
fields from mobile phone base stations, and broadcast transmitters:
A population-based survey with personal meter. Occup Environ Med.
6:550–556. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Estenberg J and Augustsson T: Extensive
frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in
outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring
system. Bioelectromagn. 35:227–230. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Sagar S, Adem SM, Struchen B, Loughran SP,
Brunjes ME, Arangua L, Dalvie MA, Croft RJ, Jerrett M, Moskowitz
JM, et al: Comparison of radiofrequency electromagnetic field
exposure levels in different everyday microenvironments in an
international context. Env Int. 114:297–306. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Thielens A, Van den Bosschea M, Brzozekc
C, Bhatt C, Abramson M, Benke G, Martens L and Joseph W:
Microenvironmental personal and head exposure measurements of
radio-frequency electromagnetic fields. In: Joint Annual Meeting of
the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European BioElectromagn
Assoc (BioEM 2018). Melbourne, pp273-279, 2018.
|
|
14
|
Misek J, Laukova T, Kohan M, Veternik M,
Jakusova V and Jakus J: Measurement of low-level radiofrequency
electromagnetic fields in the human environment. Acta Med
Martiniana. 18:27–33. 2018.
|
|
15
|
Iyare RN, Volskiy V and Vandenbosch GA:
Study of the electromagnetic exposure from mobile phones in a city
like environment: The case study of Leuven, Belgium. Environ Res.
175:402–413. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Cansiz M, Abbasov T, Kurt MB and Celik AR:
Mapping of radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in
outdoor environment and comparing with reference levels for general
public health. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 28:161–165.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Kurnaz C and Mutlu M: Comprehensive
radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements and assessments:
A city center example. Environ Monit Assess.
192(334)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Tang C, Yang C, Cai RS, Ye H, Duan L,
Zhang Z, Shi Z, Lin K, Song J and Huang X: Analysis of the
relationship between electromagnetic radiation characteristics and
urban functions in highly populated urban areas. Sci Total Environ.
654:535–540. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Federal Communications Commission. A Rule
by the Federal Communications Commission on 10/10/2012. 2012.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/10/10/2012-24792/private-land-mobile-radio-rules.
Accessed November 19, 2021.
|
|
20
|
ETSI EN 300 392-2 V3.2.1 (2007-09),
European standard, Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA); Voice plus
Data (V+D); Part 2: Air Interface (AI). 2007. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300300_300399/30039202/03.02.01_60/en_30039202v030201p.pdf.
Accessed November 19, 2021.
|
|
21
|
Loy M, Karingattil R and Williams L (eds):
ISM-Band and Short Range Device Regulatory Compliance Overview,
Application Report, Texas Instruments. 2003, http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/swra048. Accessed November
19, 2021.
|
|
22
|
Federal Communications Commission.
Unlicensed Personal Communications Service Devices in the 1920-1930
MHz Band. A Rule on 07/23/2012. 77 FR 4300. 2012. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/07/23/2012-17793/unlicensed-personal-communications-service-devices-in-the-1920-1930-mhz.band.
Accessed November 19, 2021.
|
|
23
|
European Telecommunications Standards
Institute. Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT); A
High Level Guide to the DECT Standardization, ETSI TR 101 178
V1.5.1 (2005-02) Technical Report. 2005. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/101100_101199/101178/01.05.01_60/tr_101178v010501p.pdf.
Accessed November 19, 2021.
|
|
24
|
Recommendation 13 (page 16) of the State
of New Hampshire report: ʻCommission to Study The Environmental and
Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology’. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/statstudcomm/committees/1474/reports/5G%20final%20report.pdf.
|
