Open Access

An emergence of mucormycosis during the COVID‑19 pandemic (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Devaraja Gayathri
    • Rajanna Soundarya
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 29, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.228
  • Article Number: 13
  • Copyright : © Gayathri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Mucormycosis was highly prevalent during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, particularly during the second wave, causing increased health risks to immunosuppressed or compromised individuals. This infection is long‑standing, lasting for years, specifically in immunocompromised individuals. There are no apparent risk factors and the fungus affects skin/subcutaneous tissues, resulting in the loss of facial aesthetics. In addition, individuals with a hyperglycaemic condition or diabetes mellitus, the fungus can lead to more severe complications, which are often fatal. While in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, a high risk of infection with Rhizopus oryzae is observed, with the production of ketoreductase; this enzyme in turn hydrolyses host ketone bodies. Relatively effective medications are becoming available; however, the prognosis of patients affected by this fungus may improve with an increase in awareness and early diagnosis with the intervention of expert surgeons, radiologists and microbiologists to effectively combat the condition. The present review discusses the types, symptoms and available treatment strategies for mucormycosis.

1. Introduction

Following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the incidence of mucormycosis has increased. This, in conjunction with the pandemic has caused devastating human health issues globally, particularly among South Asian and other Asian countries, particularly in individuals with major predisposing conditions, such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, comorbidity effects from steroid therapy with elevated iron levels (1). Mucormycosis can be defined as an angio-invasive fungal infection with relatively high morbidity and mortality rates. Broadly the species of the phylum Zygomycota cause mucormycosis, particularly Mucorales and Entomophthorales. In Mucorales, four genera that are most closely associated are Cunninghamella, Rhizopus, Mucor, Absidia, etc. Conidiobolus and Basidiobolus are the two key genera belonging to the Entomophthorales order and tend to cause infections in human beings (2). The etiologic agents of mucormycosis are cosmopolitan in distribution. The mucormycosis condition is a classical opportunistic invasion and typically affects immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with conditions, such as ketoacidosis, burn or trauma, or those under iron chelation treatment and some individuals who are severely immunocompromised due to malignancy or even chemotherapy (3). The case incidence of mucormycosis is underrated possibly due to laborious diagnostic procedures and mostly depends on histopathalogical analysis or the culturing process and remains under-reported (4).

Among all mucormycetes, Rhizopus oryzae is the most widespread strain and contributes for 60% of human cases and is also responsible for 90% of rhinocerebral mucormycosis cases (5). With a devastating and multifaceted clinical symptomatology, mucormycosis has emerged as an infectious disease worldwide. Mucor moulds are generally found in soil, plants, manure or even in fruit and vegetable compost, and are rarely found in air as a transient existence. Depending on the site of infection, mucormycosis differentiates into a rhinocerebral, pulmonary, cutaneous and gastrointestinal infection (6). The pathogenicity of infection ranges from mild to fatal, depending on the incubation period of the moulds. The incubation period of this fungus is 5 to 6 days; individuals can become infected by inhaling spores of moulds. Mucormycosis is generally non-contagious, and due to potential innate immunity, the majority of individuals exposed to the spores do not develop infection (7).

Once affected by Mucorales, the disease progresses rapidly. Moreover, opportunistic fungi, such as Mucor irregularis or Rhizomucor variabilis reported from China, tend to cause diverse epidemiological and clinical manifestations (8).

2. Parallelism of COVID-19 and mucormycosis

In India, ~31 million individuals were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the number of COVID-19-related mucormycosis cases also simultaneously increased, particularly during the second wave, which occurred in June, 2021. During 2021, mucormycosis was observed to be prevalent in India, and its estimated incidence was 14 in every 100,000 individuals compared to other cases (9). A sudden emergence of mucormycosis cases along with COVID-19 was observed; although rare, mucormycosis was a serious and rapid complication associated with COVID-19(9). The major cause of this condition was Mucorales spore inhalation by patients with COVID-19 with a low oxygen (hypoxia), hyperglycemic index or even steroid-induced hyperglycaemia, acidic conditions such as metabolic acidosis, diabetic ketoacidosis and high iron levels (increased ferritins), with a decreased phagocytic activity of white blood cells (WBCs) due to immunosuppression (SARS-CoV-2-mediated or other comorbidities). This was coupled with prolonged hospitalization with or without COVID-19 infection or sometimes after a few weeks of recovery (5-9). However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of mucormycosis cases increase in India perhaps due to improper hygienic maintenance in hospital linens, medications and packaged foods. This increase may also be due to the following reasons: Following infection with COVID-19 patients have a low immune status due to a decrease in WBCs. In addition, during the viral infection, patients are medicated with corticosteroids and tocilizumab to reduce lung inflammation, which often worsens the immune status, hence leading patients to become prone to fungal infection (9). The extent of acute Mucor infection is dependent upon the overall immunological status and overall health status of an individual. As COVID-19 can damage respiratory tissues and blood vessels, this increases the susceptibility to fungal infection; black fungus invades (angioinvasive mycosis) rapidly and multiplies in blood vessel walls where it effectively reduces and tears blood vessels and tissues, thereby resulting in tissue damage (10). The infection can have adverse affects in oxygen-dependent patients with poor sanitary or aseptic practices.

3. Clinical classification of mucormycosis

Depending on the site of infection, mucormycosis may be categorised into the following types (Table I).

Table I

Types of mucormycosis and the associated risk factors and symptoms.

Table I

Types of mucormycosis and the associated risk factors and symptoms.

Clinical forms of mucormycosisRisk factorsSymptoms(Refs.)
Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM)Diabetes, solid organ transplant, corticoster -oid therapy, chronic kidney disease and intravenou -s drug usageFever, Headache, Facial swelling, Facial pain, Nasal discharge, Epistaxis, Sinusitis, Hemipleagia(1,23-28)
Pulmonary mucormycosis (PM)Haematological malignancy, diabetes mellitus, haematopoietic stem cell transplant or organ transplant, renal disease in PM, post pulmonary tuberculosisHigh fever, persistent cough, pleuritic chest pain, dyspnoea and haemoptysis.(26-31)
Cutaneous mucormycosis (CM)Immunocompetent patients, diabetes mellitus, SOT, penetrating trauma, open wound trauma/motor vehicle accident/surgery, contaminated surgical dressings/burns/natural disasters/animal bites or scratchesLocalized infections restricted to cutaneous and subcutaneous infections, Fungal invasion to muscles, bones and tendons/ necrotising fasciitis(26,27,32,33)
Gastrointestinal mucormycosis (GM)Patients with malnutrition or undergoing peritoneal dialysis, solid organ transplant patients, haematological malignancies and neutropenia, diabetes mellitus, chronic alcoholism, the administration of broad-spectrum antibioticsAbdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal distension and diarrhoea(27,35,36)
Renal mucormycosis (RM)Kidney-associated diseases, dialysis.Fever, flank pain, haematuria or anuria(33,37-40)
Disseminated mucormycosis (DM)Solid organ transplant and haematological malignancy patientsSpreading through blood, leading to brain/sinus/lung/central nervous system/liver and or kidney infection(26,41)
Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM)

ROCM is the most common clinical manifestation of mucormycosis. The infection begins with the inhalation of spores, spreading into the paranasal sinuses (11). The primary etiological agent of ROCM is an aseptate fungus (Rhizopus oryzae) which is associated with a 50% mortality rate. The fungus proliferates to adjacent tissues such as the palate, sphenoid sinuses, orbits or cavernous sinuses and enters the central nervous system. Black eschar is the necrotised tissue patches due to the local extension of fungal invasion (12).

Pulmonary mucormycosis

This infection is typically associated with haematological malignancies [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines] (13), mainly associated with the lungs and is the dominant form of mucormycosis observed in patients with transplantation or in immunocompromised individuals (14). In the majority of cases, symptoms are generally non-specific and may include fever, cough, dyspnoea and chest pain. The infection presents with typical lesions involving parenchyma cells may extend to various sites in the cardiac regions (11,14) with the causative agent is Rhizopus or Mucor.

Cutaneous mucormycosis (CM)

CM may be classified into primary and secondary. Primary infection occurs by the direct introduction of fungal spores to damaged skin, whereas secondary infection occurs through dissemination from previously infected regions, such as through rhinocerebral infection (15). Apophysomyces elegans, Lichthemia and Mucor spp. are the main Mucorales species involved in primary CM, which accounts for necrosis, redness, swelling, purulent discharge and a mouldy appearance over the skin. The secondary infection is acute with a high mortality rate. Initial symptoms include sinusitis with necrotic eschar and the further loss of vision, as well as other neurological deficits (16).

Gastrointestinal mucormycosis (GIM)

Primary GIM is the less frequent form of the disease. GIM results due to the consumption of contaminated food, such as dried contaminated bread or bakery products in addition to contaminated medical devices (11-17). In the gastrointestinal tract, the stomach is the first target site of infection and this may lead to infection in the colon and later to the ileum, as well as to the duodenum and jejunum (17). Gastrointestinal bleeding with altered bowel habits and severe abdominal pain are the typical symptoms (18). The causative agent of GIM is typically Mucor and precipitated with Aspergillus and even Salmonella infection.

Disseminated mucormycosis (DM)

DM involves at least two non-contiguous sites, commonly infecting the lungs/sinus/soft tissues/central nervous system/liver/kidneys (19) mainly by Mucor and other zygomycetes. A high iron concentration and profound immunosuppression are the main predisposing factors for DM. Shirane et al (20), through a case study analysis on a 58-year-old male patient revealed that the autopsy result of the patient's body disclosed the presence of Mucor in heart, liver, right kidney, right adrenal gland and cerebellum, which resulted in thromboangiitis and infarction in these organs.

Uncommon presentations

Uncommon presentations include endocarditis/bone or and joint infections/peritonitis/pyelonephritis. Osteoarticular mucormycosis may affect after the trauma/surgical process. Peritonitis occurs due to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, while isolated renal mucormycosis is commonly observed in patients with intravenous drug usage or renal transplant patients. Another significantly rare manifestation is isolated cerebral mucormycosis, involving the central nervous system following proliferation from the paranasal sinus (21).

Health-care associated mucormycosis (HCM)

HCM is a matter of utmost concern, particularly in neonatal units, haematology, the transplantation of grafts or even in intensive care units, diabetes and severe prematurity (3). Surgical intervention is associated with 41% of HCM cases, while other cases are linked to the use of contaminated medical devices, such as adhesive bandages/tongue depressors/ostomy bags or others (21).

4. Epidemiology

The number of COVID-19 pandemic-associated black fungus infection cases has increased globally and a similar situation was observed in India. Furthermore, In India, The National COVID-19 task force has issued an advisory notice and the Union Health Ministry has instructed the states/UTs to declare black fungus as an epidemic. Infection with Mucorales, particularly in immunocompromised individuals can be quite rampant and progressive with the etiological agent being the opportunistic fungus, Mucor irregularis (22). Generally, the infection is chronic, occurring in immunocompetent patients, involving the skin and subcutaneous tissues, leading to severe complications. In India, the state of Rajasthan first declared a mucormycosis epidemic, while the city of Surat noted that 8 out of 40 COVID-19 survivors developed this infection in the eyes and lost their vision (information obtained from the India Today web desk during the second lockdown in 2021) (22).

5. Symptoms

Mucormycosis symptoms generally begin with sinusitis, nasal blockage, congestion with blackish or bloody nasal discharge, pain in the cheek bone or one-sided facial pain, numbness, swelling, blackish discoloration on nose palate, loosening of the teeth, blurred or double vision with pain, thrombosis, necrosis, chest pain, pleural effusion with difficulty in respiratory functions (21-41) (Fig. 1).

6. Aetiology and pathophysiology of the fungus

The word mycosis stands for the lethal fungal disease caused by infection and direct interaction of fungal spores with the body tissues. Mucormycosis, dermatophytoses, yeast infections, systemic mycoses and mycetoma are the pathogenic fungi involved in mycosis disease (42). Prakash et al (43) documented the pathogenic Mucorales fungi, Rhizopus, Lichtheimia, Cunninghamella, Rhizomucor and Apophysomyces as the causitive agents of mucormycosis, which were isolated from Indian soils and similarly from air samples. Among the Rhizopus species, Rhizopus arrhizus and Rhizopus homothallicus are the most common agents causing ROCM. Apophysomyces variabilis is the second highest causative agent and accounts for 60% of the total cases of mucormycosis in the population (44). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the main factors responsible for the development of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis included the high rate of diabetes mellitus, unsanitary/poor hygienic conditions and high ferritin levels in the body (45). The disease sets with the entry of Mucor or other strain spores via the air tract either through the nose, mouth or skin lacerations (46). Upon the entry of the spores, individuals who are compromised with cellular and humoral immunity are unable to provide a defence against the pathogen (47). Thus, the fungus can then spread to the paranasal sinuses, and later to the orbit, meninges or brain. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS-2) are the two receptors through which COVID-19 enters the cell. ACE2 is the receptor for the majority of cells in the body and has a higher rate of expression in the respiratory and renal tract, and gastrointestinal epithelium. TMPRSS receptors are similar to ACE2, but are present only in respiratory and gastrointestinal epithelial cells. TMPRSS-2 along with ACE2 receptors has a tendency to attack lymphocytes, thus reducing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts, resulting in a weaker immunity, also inducing lymphopenia. The reduction in the T-cell number consequently increases interleukin levels and effectively achieves the state of the cytokine storm (48). The cytokine storm weakens the defence system reserve pool, causes the atrophy of lymphoid tissue, and prevents the further production, differentiation and proliferation of protective lymphocytes. The weakened immune system paves the way for the entry of Mucorales into the body. Another key condition which fuels the fungal growth is lactic acidosis; this eventually destroys type II alveolar cells, leading to excessive respiratory disabilities that intensify acid-base levels. The resulting hypoperfusion and hypoxemia worsens the condition of the body by increasing acidic conditions. The coupled reaction of the cytokine storm and lacto/keto acidosis aggravates the state of the patient; in this case, there is an urgent need for treatment through immunosuppressive steroids. These criteria promote an ideal environment for the fungus to grow (49). In addition to this, increased ferritin level due haemolysis and an increased body temperature promote the growth and development of the fungus in immunosuppressed individuals (50). The ACE2 receptor nourishes the growth of Mucorales by damaging pancreatic β-cells, which results in elevated plasma glucose levels, and the consequent increase in glucose levels feeds the fungus. This explains the increased rate of mucormycosis in diabetic patients (6,47,48). These irreversible consequences eventually deteriorate the overall health status of the patient, often leading to fatal results (51).

7. Conditions such as diabetes and the incidence of mucormycosis

It has been reported that during 2013-2015, in four major tertiary care hospital in India, there were 388 incidents of mucormycosis, and 56% of these cases had unregulated diabetes, which demonstrates that the existence of underlying conditions predisposes the proliferation of the fungus. In addition, trauma was reported in 10% of these cases, which signifies the linkage of this fungal infection to diabetes (39,41,52). India has a prevalence of diabetes of 9% in the adult population (44). Conversely, coronavirus infects the pancreas and can disrupt blood sugar levels perhaps due to the infection or due to clinical treatment. In this context, host immunity appears to be compromised; consequently, elevated sugar levels provide an ideal pabulum for mucormycosis development and in individuals with uncontrolled diabetes, this enables the highest replication of SARS CoV-2, which produces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (18,19). In fact, the uncontrolled diabetes condition enhances acidic media, which is an ideal condition for the proliferation of the fungus. Thus, mycelial invasion and proliferation are promoted by the hyperglycaemic index and acidosis (53) followed by the enhanced release of iron from ferritin (due to acidosis). Therefore, it is critical to maintain blood sugar levels under control during the course of antifungal treatment.

In a case study conducted among 95 patients with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) who were admitted to the Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital from June to September, 2021 (70 males and 25 females), 69% of the patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus with mean serum ferritin levels of 537.38±468.88 ng/ml. The patients were positive for Mucorales and the KOH test, while serum ferritin levels were markedly elevated and identified as Aspergillus, Mucor, Rhizopus and Candida spp. (54).

8. Diagnosis

Since the mortality, morbidity and haematological defects are prominent features, the diagnosis of mucormycosis poses a tough challenge. Rapid diagnosis from invasive aspergillosis is of top priority as antifungal treatment would differ, while the underlying clinical conidtions are almost similar (6,55). Basically, direct microscopy was the gold standard for diagnosis until recently; however, the process was cumbersome. In the case of invasive aspergillosis, the assay for circulating antigens, such as galactomannan/β-D-1,3-glucan is ideal, although it provides no evidence of Mucormycosis (56). Hence, for mucormycosis, direct microscopy, histopathology for hyphal detection and invasion along with the analysis of cultural characteristics on Sabouraud dextrose agar or potato dextrose agar are optimal diagnostic tools. With the advent of molecular biology tools and applications, the rapid detection of fungal infection has become a reality. A quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based 18S rRNA targeting Mucor/Rhizopus, Lichtheimia and Rhizomucor has recently become a hallmark of detection, particularly during the early stages and even within 3 days of the disease onset using blood or serum with 90% authenticity (52). In the case of post-burn infection, this can be detected 11 days before standard diagnosis. RT-PCR analysis of Mucorales in tissue/biopsy for haematological malignancies can detect probable mucormycosis infection (57).

9. Prophylaxis and treatment

The effective treatment of mucormycosis is generally based on a multifaceted strategy, which may include early medication at the optimal dosage, the complete evacuation of the fungus and use of diverse adjunctive therapies (58). The majority of Mucorales exhibit resistance to most antifungal agents in vitro (voriconazole). Amphotericin B is an effective drug, with the exception of some species of Cunninghamella and Apophysomyces (6). In addition, posaconazole and isavuconazole are also effective, and itraconazole and terbinafine exhibit some activity against certain species.

Amphotericin B

The recommendations from the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-6) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)/European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) guidelines suggest the usage of a lipid formulation of amphotericin B as a frontline therapy (59).

The liposomal amphotericin B suggested dose is 5 mg/kg/day and the maximum 10 mg/kg/day (central nervous system infection). Amphotericin B is the polyene antifungal agent (highly protein bound and poorly dialyzable) and binds to sterols (ergosterol) on the fungal cell membrane surface. This antifungal drug change in membrane permeability leading to cell cytoplasmic leakage. The high dosage of this antifungal drug can result in chills, fever, phlebitis, renal damage and anaphylaxis as side-effects. Dosage may gradually increase from 5 to 10 mg/day, up to a total dose of 0.5 to 0.7 mg/kg/day, depending on the cardiorenal status of the patient. An important risk factor while using amphotericin B is that the dosage must not exceed 1.5 mg/kg; an overdose can result in cardiorespiratory arrest (60). A new formulation, namely a lipid complex (amphotericin B) was designed, as it is less nephrotoxic than the existing amphotericin B. This lipid-based formulation increases the retention time during circulation and alters the biodistribution. The amphotericin B complexed with lipid concentrations induces capillary permeability in body tissues, as normal tissue is purely impermeable to lipid-complex drugs. This method of increasing the localization of drugs in the targeted sites is termed passive targeting. This method enhances drug delivery to the fungi in infected organs and phagocytes with a lower toxicity, while maintaining antifungal efficacy with drug levels sustained in tissues with the action of lipase for drug release (61). The suggested dose for liposomal amphotericin B is 5 mg/kg/day minimum to as high as 10 mg/kg/day (central nervous system infection).

Mechanisms of Amphotericin B

The antifungal drug amphotericin B, a macrolide, derived from Streptomyces nodosus which acts upon the plasma membrane of the fungi (62). This antibiotic molecule binds to the sterols present in the plasma membranes, such as ergosterol of fungal cells and cholesterol of mammalian cells. It has a higher affinity towards ergosterol than cholesterol (63). Amphotericin B enters through the cell wall of the fungus and binds to the ergosterol present on the plasma membrane. This creates an ionic imbalance by forming pores, and leads to the leakage of potassium ions from the hydrophilic ion channels created inside the fungal membrane. Amphotericin B has a high binding affinity towards potassium ions and is hence known as an ionophore. The leakage of potassium ions causes the loss of membrane rigidity, resulting in the discharge of essential small molecules from the membrane; through this manner, amphotericin b exhibits its fungicidal activity (64). The mechanisms of action of amphotericin B are illustrated in Fig. 2.

Triazoles

Triazoles are currently in clinical use and are the largest class of antifungal drugs. Out of the 40 second-generation triazoles, posaconazole and isavuconazole are two key antifungals that possess good activity against Mucorales. The mechanism of drug action involves the inhibition of the 14-α demethylation of lanosterol present in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway. The demethylation of lanosterol results in the depletion and the replacement of ergosterol with toxic 14-α-methylsterols, thus altering membrane permeability and inhibiting membrane-bound enzymes (65).

Posaconazole

Posaconazole is similar to itraconazole in its structure, considered as second-line or salvage therapy for patients who are intolerant to amphotericin B (66). Isavuconazole is structurally resembles fluconazole, and is the only antifungal drug approved for use in the treatment of invasive mucormycosis. At present, isavuconazole is available in the market in its prodrug form known as isavuconazonium sulfate, which is rapidly metabolized by serum butylcholinesterase to its active form. The recommended dosage for the intake of isavuconazonium sulfate is 372 mg every 8 h for six doses, and 372 mg daily (67). In vitro, isavuconazole exhibits activity against Lichtheimia, Rhizopus, Mucor and Cunninghamella spp. (68).

When the fungal infection is at very severe stage, surgical intervention is the only alternative. In this context, necrotic tissues have to be removed along with surrounding infected healthy-looking tissues to prevent the further proliferation of Mucorales hyphae. Surgery is compulsory during rhino-orbitocerebral infection and soft tissue infection, even in the case of a single localized pulmonary lesion, but has to be carefully considered when infection is disseminated or reaches difficult-to-reach organs.

Ayurvedic and Unani system for the treatment of mucormycosis

Some patients who have recovered from COVID-19 continue to have post-COVID-associated conditions, including mucormycosis. The shortage of medicine creates a vital problem for the treatment of the disease. Hence the research experts from the Ministry of Ayush have asserted the implementation of the Ayurvedic and Unani systems of medicine to prevent the spreading of black fungus (69). Adluri and Perugu (70), following the decision made by the Telangana Government to implement Ayurvedic medicine in the treatment of mucormycosis, assessed the safety and efficacy of the Ayurvedic regime. In Ayurvedic medicine, mucormycosis was termed as Vataja viradhi, and to cure the disease they used Pancha Tkita Ghrita Guggullu (PTGG) as an Ayurvedic adjuvant therapy. They performed controlled palcebo trials for patients with post-COVID mucormycosis in the Gandhi Hospital, a large Government tertiary centre in Telangana. In their case control study, they included 77 patients with post-COVID mucormycosis. A total of 65 patients received PTGG: 36 patients received PTGG for 34.1 days (group 1) and group 2 (n=29), used as the control (dropouts) received PTGG only for 2.1 days. All patients were examined for disease progression, disease recurrence, the persistence of symptoms and mortality before and after treatment (70). The outcomes of the treatment were fruitful with a zero mortality rate in group 1, whereas 13.8% severity was noted in group 2; that case study reported that the use of PTGG was helpful, safe and well-tolerated with concomitant antifungal usage (70). Mohsina et al (69) listed some of the Ayurvedic medicine rituals, such as kasaya tikta rasa prayoga, rikta prasadanam, ojo vrddhi krmighna, kapha pitta haram and ruksa. They used many aragvadadi kasayam, amrtottaram kasayam, guducyadi kasayam, nimbadi kasayam, sonitamrtam kasayam and katakakadiradi kasayam to treat patients with post-COVID mucormycosis. Visa vilvadi gulika comprised of Bilva, Tulasi, Karanja, Tagara, Devadaru, Marica, Daruharidra, Ajamutra, Haritaki, Vbhitaki, Amalaki, Sunti, Pippali, Haridra, Pathya, Nilini and Isvari. They offered these kashayam at 50, 50, 50 ml on an empty stomach, after food in the morning and before food and finally concluded that these Ayurvedic medicines boost the immunity of patients with post-COVID-associated mucormycosis (69). The leaf extract of Catharanthus roseus, Lantana camara, Nerium indicum, Sida cordifolia and Ziziphus mauritiana was examined against Mucor circinelloides in in vitro antimycotic studies. The highest antimycotic activity was exhibited by the ethanol leaf extract of Catharanthus roseus, followed by Nerium indicum and Lantana camara. Ziziphus mauritiana exhibited moderate activity against Mucor circinelloides (71). Balakrishna et al (72) implemented Anu taila to cure mucormycosis; Anu taila is comprised of tej patra, vidang, nagkesar, chandan, tavak, bala, yeshtimadhu and daru haldi. The consumption of Anu taila improved the immune response against Mucor spores by activating pre-treated human THP-1 cells and TNF-α. The repeated application of Anu taila significantly reduced the ergosterol content in the Mucor biomass and was more effective than amphotericin B, where the replacement of hyphae, sporangiophores and sporangia with the fused biomass was evidently proven in SEM images. Anu taila downregulated the sterol-c5-desaturase coding ERG3 gene, crucial for maintaining structural integrity in Mucor spp. and also blocks ergosterol biosynthesis (72).

10. Comorbidity effects of mucormycosis

Mucormycosis may result in the loss of the upper jaw or even sometimes the eyes. Due to this loss of the jaw, patients may have difficulty with chewing, swallowing, facial aesthetics and can suffer a disrupted self-confidence (73).

11. Preventive measures

The early, effective and rapid diagnosis/administration of suitable effective drugs, the application of hyperbaric oxygen, recombinant cytokines, the transfusion of granulocytes, surgical intervention, prosthetic obturator are the typical and crucial methods in successful management (16,74). Patients with uncontrolled diabetes require rapid corrective measures for metabolic abnormalities; the use of sodium bicarbonate (with insulin) is mandatory to reverse ketoacidosis, as it reduces the ability of Mucorales invasion (74). However, the use of immunosuppressive drugs/corticosteroids need to be reduced to the lowest possible level with epidemiological knowledge (75).

12. Conclusion and future perspectives

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk of infections worldwide due to the lack of specific treatments available for the most devastating viral infections. During the second wave of the pandemic, the number of deaths rapidly increased and reached uncontrollable levels. The management of COVID-19 led to the continuous use of steroids, antibiotics and breath supportive sources, such as oxygen carriers and ventilators; these worsened the conditions of patients by increasing comorbidities. Co-morbidities, such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases intensified during the management of COVID-19, which led to the development of secondary infections, such as mucormycosis. Mucormycosis is an invasive fungal infection accompanied by ketoacidosis, high glucose and high ferritin levels, neutropenia and a lower immunity. All these parameters make patients immunocompromised, with decreased levels of WBCs, T-cells and other immune cells, leading to a cytokine storm in the body and the impairment of cellular organs. As the management of the disease is critical, novel diagnostic and treatment strategies are required for mucormycosis in order to prevent higher morbidity and mortality rates. Hence, additional extensive research and investigations to elucidate the root cause of mucormycosis are warranted in order to provide clinicians with the tools to combat infection in association with the pandemic.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

DG conceived the study and was also involved in the editing, reviewing and revising of the manuscript, and also communicated the manuscript to the journal. RS drafted the manuscript, obtained the data acquired for the review and processed the figures. Both the authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Pushparaj K, Bhotla HK, Arumugam VA, Pappusamy M, Easwaran M and Balasubramanian B: Mucormycosis (black fungus) ensuing COVID-19 and comorbidity meets-Magnifying global pandemic grieve and catastrophe begins. Sci Total Environ. 805(150355)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Hernandez-Ramirez G, Barber D, Tome-Amat J, Garrido-Arandia M and Diaz-Perales A: Alternaria as an inducer of allergic sensitization. J Fungi (Basel). 7(838)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Ibrahim AS, Spellberg B, Walsh TJ and Kontoyiannis DP: Pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 54 (Suppl 1):S16–S22. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Skiada A, Pavleas I and Drogari-Apiranthitou M: Epidemiology and diagnosis of mucormycosis: An update. J Fungi (Basel). 6(265)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Singh AK, Singh R, Joshi SR and Misra A: Mucormycosis in COVID-19: A systematic review of cases reported worldwide and in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 15(102146)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Skiada A, Lass-Floerl C, Klimko N, Ibrahim A, Roilides E and Petrikkos G: Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of mucormycosis. Med Mycol. 56 (Suppl 1):S93–S101. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Borkar SG: Mucormycosis: A surge in mucorales fungal infection in post-covid patients in Indian States and insight into known and unknown factors. Int J Global Health. 1:26–60. 2021.

8 

Lu XL, Najafzadeh MJ, Dolatabadi S, Ran YP, Gerrits van den Ende AH, Shen YN, Li CY, Xi LY, Hao F, Zhang QQ, et al: Taxonomy and epidemiology of Mucor irregularis, agent of chronic cutaneous mucormycosis. Persoonia. 30:48–56. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Aranjani JM, Manuel A, Abdul Razack HI and Mathew ST: COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: Evidence-based critical review of an emerging infection burden during the pandemic's second wave in India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 15(e0009921)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Alom S, Ali F and Md ZK: A comprehensive review on mucormycosis (Black fungus) and its association with covid-19. Curr Trends Pharm Res. 8:11–40. 2021.

11 

Serris A, Danion F and Lanternier F: Disease entities in mucormycosis. J Fungi (Basel). 5(23)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Ghosh D, Dey S, Chakraborty H, Mukherjee S, Halder A, Sarkar A and Sarkar J: Mucormycosis: A new threat to Coronavirus disease 2019 with special emphasis on India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 15(101013)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Dulski TM, DeLong M, Garner K, Patil N, Cima MJ, Rothfeldt L and Kothari A: Notes from the field: COVID-19-Associated Mucormycosis-Arkansas, July-September 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 70:1750–1751. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Bourcier J, Heudes PM, Morio F, Gastinne T, Chevallier P, Rialland-Battisti F and Peterlin P: Prevalence of the reversed halo sign in neutropenic patients compared with non-neutropenic patients: Data from a single-centre study involving 27 patients with pulmonary mucormycosis (2003-2016). Mycoses. 60:526–533. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Pérez ADC and Welsh EC: Cutaneous mucormycosis. An Bras Dermatol. 92:304–311. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Huang SF, Ying-Jung Wu A, Shin-Jung Lee S, Huang YS, Lee CY, Yang TL, Wang HW, Chen HJ, Chen YC, Ho TS, et al: Review of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 56:442–454. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Spellberg B: Gastrointestinal mucormycosis: An evolving disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 8:140–142. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Suresh S and Radha KV: Effect of a mixed substrate on phytase production by Rhizopus oligosporus MTCC 556 using solid state fermentation and determination of dephytinization activities in food grains. Food Sci Biotechnology. 24:551–559. 2015.

19 

Lin CY, Wang IT, Chang CC, Lee WC, Liu WL, Huang YC, Chang KW, Huang HY, Hsiao HL, Kao KC, et al: Comparison of clinical manifestation, diagnosis, and outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and pulmonary mucormycosis. Microorganisms. 7(531)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Shirane S, Watanabe D, Sekiya N, Horiguchi SI and Najima Y: Paraplegia via hematogenous dissemination of Cunninghamella elegans (mucormycosis) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Infect Dis. 113:210–212. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Rammaert B, Lanternier F, Zahar JR, Dannaoui E, Bougnoux ME, Lecuit M and Lortholary O: Healthcare-associated mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 54 (Suppl 1):S44–S54. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

India Today: Black fungus detected in Covid-19 survivors, 8 lose eyesight in Surat. India Today TV, New Delhi, 2021. https://www.indiatoday.in/coronavirus-outbreak/story/black-fungus-mucormycosis-detected-covid19-survivors-8-lose-eyesight-surat-fungal-infection-symptoms-1799971-2021-05-07?utm_source=washare&utm_medium=socialicons&utm_campaign=shareurltracking. Updated: May 20, 2021.

23 

Reed C, Bryant R, Ibrahim AS, Edwards J Jr, Filler SG, Goldberg R and Spellberg B: Combination polyene-caspofungin treatment of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 47:364–371. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Vaughan C, Bartolo A, Vallabh N and Leong SC: A meta-analysis of survival factors in rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis-has anything changed in the past 20 years. Clin Otolaryngol. 43:1454–1464. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Yohai RA, Bullock JD, Aziz AA and Markert RJ: Survival factors in rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Surv Ophthalmol. 39:3–22. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Jeong W, Keighley C, Wolfe R, Lee WL, Slavin MA, Kong DCM and Chen SA: The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports. Clin Microbiol Infect. 25:26–34. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Roden MM, Zaoutis TE, Buchanan WL, Knudsen TA, Sarkisova TA, Schaufele RL, Sein M, Sein T, Chiou CC, Chu JH, et al: Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: A review of 929 reported cases. Clin Infect Dis. 41:634–653. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Prakash H and Chakrabarti A: Global epidemiology of mucormycosis. J Fungi (Basel). 5(26)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Tedder M, Spratt JA, Anstadt MP, Hegde SS, Tedder SD and Lowe JE: Pulmonary mucormycosis: Results of medical and surgical therapy. Ann Thor Surg. 57:1044–1050. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Lee FY, Mossad SB and Adal KA: Pulmonary mucormycosis: The last 30 years. Arch Internal Med. 159:1301–1309. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Feng J and Sun X: Characteristics of pulmonary mucormycosis and predictive risk factors for the outcome. Infection. 46:503–512. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Skiada A, Rigopoulos D, Larios G, Petrikkos G and Katsambas A: Global epidemiology of cutaneous zygomycosis. Clin Dermatol. 30:628–632. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Chakrabarti A, Das A, Mandal J, Shivaprakash MR, George VK, Tarai B, Rao P, Panda N, Verma SC and Sakhuja V: The rising trend of invasive zygomycosis in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Med Mycol. 44:335–342. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Simbli M, Hakim F, Koudieh M and Tleyjeh IM: Nosocomial post-traumatic cutaneous mucormycosis: A systematic review. Scand J Infectious Dis. 40:577–582. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Kaur H, Ghosh A, Rudramurthy SM and Chakrabarti A: Gastrointestinal mucormycosis in apparently immunocompetent hosts-A review. Mycoses. 61:898–908. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Dioverti MV, Cawcutt KA, Abidi M, Sohail MR, Walker RC and Osmon DR: Gastrointestinal mucormycosis in immunocompromised hosts. Mycoses. 58:714–718. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Guinea J, Escribano P, Vena A, Muñoz P, Martínez-Jiménez MDC, Padilla B and Bouza E: Increasing incidence of mucormycosis in a large Spanish hospital from 2007 to 2015: Epidemiology and microbiological characterization of the isolates. PLoS One. 12(e0179136)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Chakrabarti A, Chatterjee SS, Das A, Panda N, Shivaprakash MR, Kaur A, Varma SC, Singhi S, Bhansali A and Sakhuja V: Invasive zygomycosis in India: Experience in a tertiary care hospital. Postgraduate Med J. 85:573–581. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Jianhong L, Xianliang H and Xuewu J: Isolated renal mucormycosis in children. J Urol. 171:387–388. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Bhadauria D, Etta P, Chelappan A, Gurjar M, Kaul A, Sharma RK, Gupta A, Prasad N, Marak RS, Jain M, et al: Isolated bilateral renal mucormycosis in apparently immunocompetent patients-a case series from India and review of the literature. Clin Kidney J. 11:769–776. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Skiada A, Pagano L, Groll A, Zimmerli S, Dupont B, Lagrou K, Lagrou K, Lass-Florl C, Bouza E, Klimko N, et al: Zygomycosis in Europe: Analysis of 230 cases accrued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Working Group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007. Clin Microbiol Infect. 17:1859–1867. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Anjum NA: Mucormycosis: Botanical insights into the major causative agents, 8 June, 2021.

43 

Prakash H, Singh S, Rudramurthy SM, Singh P, Mehta N, Shaw D and Ghosh AK: An aero mycological analysis of Mucormycetes in indoor and outdoor environments of northern India. Med Mycol. 58:118–123. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Prakash H and Chakrabarti A: Epidemiology of mucormycosis in India. Microorganisms. 9(523)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Ravindra K and Ahlawat A: Five probable factors responsible for the COVID-associated mucormycosis outbreak in India. Int J Infectious Dis. 112:278–280. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Alim A, Pati BK, Sarfraz A and Bharti B: Rhinocerebral mucormycosis in a diabetic patient: A case report with brief review. Int J Med Res Prof. 5:150–154. 2019.

47 

Mohindra S, Mohindra S, Gupta R, Bakshi J and Gupta SK: Rhinocerebral mucormycosis: The disease spectrum in 27 patients. Mycoses. 50:290–296. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Almas T, Nazar W, Khedro T, Kanawati MA, Adnan A, Almuhaileej M, Alshamlan A, Abdulhadi A, Manamperi KT and Sarfraz S: COVID-19 and mucormycosis superinfection: Exploring the missing pathophysiological links. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 68(102655)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Aggarwal S, Gollapudi S, Yel L, Gupta AS and Gupta S: TNF-α-induced apoptosis in neonatal lymphocytes: TNFRp55 expression and downstream pathways of apoptosis. Genes Immunity. 1:271–279. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, Meidenbauer N, Ammer J, Edinger M, Gottfried E, Schwarz S, Rothe G, Hoves S, et al: Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 109:3812–3819. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Johnson AK, Ghazarian Z, Cendrowski KD and Persichino JG: Pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis in a patient with COVID-19. Med Mycol Case Rep. 32:64–67. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Patel A, Kaur H, Xess I, Michael JS, Savio J, Rudramurthy S, Singh R, Shastri P, Umabala P, Sardana R, et al: A multicentre observational study on the epidemiology, risk factors, management and outcomes of mucormycosis in India. Clin Microbiol Infect. 26:944.e9–944.e15. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Khanna M, Challa S, Kabeil AS, Inyang B, Gondal FJ, Abah GA, Minnal Dhandapani M, Manne M and Mohammed L: Risk of mucormycosis in diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Cureus. 13(e18827)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Indu DP, Yadhav MLK and Chetana GS: Is serum ferritin an early marker for COVID-19-associated mucormycosis? Cureus. 15(e36734)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Pilmis B, Alanio A, Lortholary O and Lanternier F: Recent advances in the understanding and management of mucormycosis. F1000Research. 7(F1000 Faculty Rev-1429)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Millon L, Larosa F, Lepiller Q, Legrand F, Rocchi S, Daguindau E, Scherer E, Bellanger AP, Leroy J and Grenouillet F: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of circulating DNA in serum for early diagnosis of mucormycosis in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 56:e95–e101. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Guegan H, Iriart X, Bougnoux ME, Berry A, Robert-Gangneux F and Gangneux JP: Evaluation of MucorGenius® mucorales PCR assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis. J Infect. 81:311–317. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Muley P, Chitguppi R and Jambure R: Proposal for a novel grading system for rhino-maxillary mucormycosis based on the analysis of 30 cases. (May 27, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3854282 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854282.

59 

Tissot F, Agrawal S, Pagano L, Petrikkos G, Groll AH, Skiada A, Lass-Flörl C, Calandra T, Viscoli C and Herbrecht R: ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Haematologica. 102:433–444. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Meyer RD: Current role of therapy with amphotericin B. Clinical infectious diseases. 14 (Suppl 1):S154–S160. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Dash AK, Patro S, Patro SK, Gupta AK and Biswal RN: Amphotericin B emulsion in rhino-orbital mucormycosis: Is it most effective? Clinical Rhinol An Inter J. 9:40–42. 2016.

62 

Torrado JJ, Espada R, Ballesteros MP and Torrado-Santiago S: Amphotericin B formulations and drug targeting. J Pharm Sci. 97:2405–2425. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Liu T, Wang L and Liu CT: Cavitary pulmonary mucormycosis caused by Cunninghamella in a patient with diabetes. Am J Med Sci. 364:245–247. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Fernández-García R, Muñoz-García JC, Wallace M, Fabian L, González-Burgos E, Gómez-Serranillos MP, Raposo R, Bolás-Fernández F, Ballesteros MP, Healy AM, et al: Self-assembling, supramolecular chemistry and pharmacology of amphotericin B: Poly-aggregates, oligomers and monomers. J Control Release. 341:716–732. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Kim MJ, Park PW, Ahn JY, Kim KH, Seo JY, Jeong JH, Park MJ, Jung JW and Seo YH: Fatal pulmonary mucormycosis caused by Rhizopus microsporus in a patient with diabetes. Ann Lab Med. 34:76–79. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Odds FC, Brown AJ and Gow NA: Antifungal agents: Mechanisms of action. Trends Microbiol. 11:272–279. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Pettit NN and Carver PL: Isavuconazole: A new option for the management of invasive fungal infections. Ann Pharmacother. 49:825–842. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Marty FM, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Cornely OA, Mullane KM, Perfect JR, Thompson GR III, Alangaden GJ, Brown JM, Fredricks DN, Heinz WJ, et al: Isavuconazole treatment for mucormycosis: A single-arm open-label trial and case-control analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 16:828–837. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Mohsina FP, Faheem IP, Tabassum S, Shah I and Ahmad A: An insight of mucormycosis (black fungus) in ayurveda. Open J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 6:13–17. 2021.

70 

Adluri USP and Perugu S: Evaluation of efficacy and safety of adjuvant Ayurvedic therapy in patients with severe post-covid mucor-mycosis at a Government tertiary care hospital-A Case-Control study. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 13(100585)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Jangid R and Begum T: Antimycotic activity of some medicinal plants against Mucor circinelloides. Biomed Res Int. 2022(3523920)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Balkrishna A, Rastogi S, Kharayat B, Tomer M, Varshney Y, Singh K, Kumari P, Dev R, Srivastava J, Haldar S and Varshney A: Anu taila, an herbal nasal drop, suppresses mucormycosis by regulating host TNF-α response and fungal ergosterol biosynthesis. J Appl Microbiol. 132:3355–3374. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Sharma S, Grover M, Bhargava S, Samdani S and Kataria T: Post coronavirus disease mucormycosis: A deadly addition to the pandemic spectrum. J Laryngol Otol. 135:442–447. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Szebenyi C, Gu Y, Gebremariam T, Kocsubé S, Kiss-Vetráb S, Jáger O, Patai R, Spisák K, Sinka R, Binder U, et al: CotH genes are necessary for normal spore formation and virulence in Mucor lusitanicus. mBio. 14(e0338622)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Chaudhary P and Singh P: Isolation, identification and molecular characterization of microflora obtained from spices and spice mixes. World J Pharmaceutical Res. 3:2020–2030. 2014.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-April 2024
Volume 6 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2632-2900
Online ISSN:2632-2919

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gayathri D and Gayathri D: An emergence of mucormycosis during the COVID‑19 pandemic (Review). World Acad Sci J 6: 13, 2024
APA
Gayathri, D., & Gayathri, D. (2024). An emergence of mucormycosis during the COVID‑19 pandemic (Review). World Academy of Sciences Journal, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.228
MLA
Gayathri, D., Soundarya, R."An emergence of mucormycosis during the COVID‑19 pandemic (Review)". World Academy of Sciences Journal 6.2 (2024): 13.
Chicago
Gayathri, D., Soundarya, R."An emergence of mucormycosis during the COVID‑19 pandemic (Review)". World Academy of Sciences Journal 6, no. 2 (2024): 13. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.228