Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
World Academy of Sciences Journal
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 2632-2900 Online ISSN: 2632-2919
Journal Cover
November-December 2025 Volume 7 Issue 6

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
November-December 2025 Volume 7 Issue 6

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article Open Access

Incidence and risk factors for group B Streptococcus colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes

  • Authors:
    • Lina Raid Al‑Obaidi
    • Najah Shakir Alkhalil
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad 10047, Iraq
    Copyright: © Al‑Obaidi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
  • Article Number: 107
    |
    Published online on: September 19, 2025
       https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2025.395
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Group B Streptococcus (GBS), also known as Streptococcus agalactiae, is the normal flora present in the female urogenital tract and rectum. Globally, it is estimated that 15 to 40% of pregnant women are colonised by GBS. Its chief clinical significance is that it is an acknowledged risk factor for the early onset of neonatal sepsis (even when colonisation is asymptomatic), as it can be transferred during delivery to neonates from their colonised mothers, and can cause sepsis and meningitis in newborns. The present analytical cross‑sectional study included 100 women experiencing preterm labour. Data were collected from the January 1, 2023 to November 1, 2023. Preterm birth was defined as birth at a gestational age from 28 to 36 weeks + 6 days. The exclusion criteria were women pregnant with a foetus diagnosed with congenital anomalies, with premature rupture of membranes, or women with fever, an elevated white blood cell count or any features suggestive of chorioamnionitis. Prior to delivery, a vaginal and rectal swab sample was obtained during a vaginal examination and was sent to the laboratory for the culture of GBS. All mothers received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. The prevalence of GBS colonisation was found to be 8%. As regards the risk factors associated with maternal GBS colonisation, a statistically significant association was detected between GBS colonisation and both diabetes and a higher pre‑pregnancy body mass index. As regards the outcomes, a positive GBS colonisation was significantly associated with a lower gestational age at birth and poor neonatal survival. Although the present study found that vertical transmission may be controlled by the proper administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, babies of mothers with maternal colonisation had poor outcomes (5/8, 62.5% did not survive), as GBS colonisation was significantly associated with a lower gestational age (which was significantly associated with neonatal mortality). Moreover, the present study effectively consolidated the association between maternal group B colonisation and both diabetes mellitus and obesity. Therefore, women with diabetes mellitus and obesity require special attention for the early detection and early management of GBS colonisation.

Introduction

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a β-haemolytic, Gram-positive bacteria coccus that asymptomatically colonises the lower genital and gastrointestinal tracts (1). Due to the ability of GBS to adhere and infiltrate the placental chorionic villi, vaginal colonisation during gestation poses a risk for ascending infection and neonatal transmission upon delivery (2). In the absence of preventative measures, GBS will be passed vertically to the newborn via contaminated bodily and amniotic fluids before or during delivery in ~50% of colonised mothers, resulting in neonatal illnesses, such as neonatal meningitis, pneumonia and neonatal sepsis (3-5).

The third trimester screening of pregnant women for this organism, along with subsequent antibiotic prophylaxis for maternal colonisation, has significantly decreased the prevalence of early-onset neonatal illness from 1.7 cases per 1,000 live births in the early 1990s to 0.22 cases per 1,000 live births in 2017(6).

Thus, all mothers who test positive for GBS during routine screening at 35 to 37 weeks of pregnancy should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology also recommends intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for pregnant women who have a history of GBS bacteriuria at any point during the current or previous pregnancy. In the case that the GBS status of a pregnant woman is unknown, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends IAP in the event that specific risk factors are present. These include ‘preterm labour before 37 weeks, rupture of membranes for 18 hours or more, a maternal fever of 100.4˚F or higher during labour, or a positive rapid GBS nucleic acid amplification test during childbirth’ (7).

Preterm birth accounts for 500,000 neonatal deaths annually globally, including 44% of all mortality among children <5 years of age. The predominant cause of premature deliveries is microbial infections, with 10% attributable to GBS (2). The vaginal colonisation with GBS is a well-acknowledged risk factor for preterm birth. The bacteria induce inflammation, histopathological chorioamnionitis and preterm premature rupture of membranes, leading to preterm birth, either by ascending infection or by generating membrane vesicles (8).

The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of GBS colonisation among women experiencing preterm labour, and to identify and analyse the maternal risk factors associated with GBS colonisation. The present study also aimed to investigate potential neonatal implications associated with this infection.

Patients and methods

Location of study and study design

The present study was conducted at the Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical city, Baghdad, Iraq. Data were collected from January 1, 2023 to November 1, 2023. The present study used an analytical cross-sectional design. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Verbal consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. An official letter of approval (no. 338) was obtained from the Scientific Committee of the Scientific Council of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Iraqi Board for Health Specializations, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data and sample collection

A total of 100 pregnant women with established preterm labour (gestational age, 28 to 36 weeks + 6 days) were included in the present study. Preterm labour was diagnosed based on documented uterine contractions and cervical dilation exceeding 4 cm. All deliveries occurred prior to 37 weeks of gestation. The gestational age was calculated depending on the last menstrual period (LMP) of the mother and the first trimester ultrasound scan. A full history and thorough general and obstetrical examinations were performed for all women.

Basic sociodemographic and obstetric data were collected [age, parity, gestational age, past medical history, body mass index (BMI) and birth weight]. A total of 10 cm3 of blood were collected from the pregnant women for general analyses: Complete blood count, renal function test, liver function test, thyroid function test, blood group and Rh factor. A vaginal and rectal swab sample were also obtained during a vaginal examination.

As the infection prevention and control settings in the hospital were not deemed as being of a high standard (in the hospital, due to the overcrowding of the wards, and the close proximity between patients made it difficult to maintain a safe distance between patients, increasing the risk of airborne and contact-based infections), the consultant gynaecologist decided to administer antibiotic therapy to all mothers with preterm labour (IV ceftriaxone vial 1 gm in a single dose, and in the case of allergy, vancomycin vial at 1 gm).

In the laboratory (private sector), using the VITEK-2 machine, the following procedures were performed: i) Inoculation and incubation: The specimen was inoculated with enrichment broth (nutrient) for 24 h and then transferred into the appropriate culture media (Blood agar, MacConkey agar or Sebouraud dextrose agar) (BioMérieux) to subculture, at the appropriate temperature and conditions for GBS growth (typically 35-37˚C for 24 h). ii) Isolation: The colony was examined for growth on the culture plates. GBS colonies typically appear as small, greyish-white colonies, with a surrounding zone of beta-haemolysis, on the blood agar. iii) Identification: A sterile loop was used to select a single colony and transfer it to the appropriate VITEK-2 identification card, designed for the Streptococcus species. The VITEK-2 system (BioMérieux) provided a profile of the organism based on its characteristics after (6-8 h), and generated a report that included the identification of the Streptococcus species, including GBS. The result was received after 3 days.

Following delivery, all neonates were followed-up for 1 week as follows: i) Those who required admission to the Neonatal Care Unit had blood cultures obtained, in the event that their admission lasted >3 days. ii) Those who were discharged from the Neonatal Care Unit of the hospital, had their follow-up performed by phone, for up to 1 week.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were women with singleton pregnancies, presenting with preterm labour (from 28 to 36 weeks + 6 days), with gestational age being diagnosed by LMP, confirmed by a report of the first trimester ultrasound. The exclusion criteria were as follows: Women pregnant with a foetus with congenital anomalies, women with premature rupture of membranes, and women with fever, an elevated white blood cell count, or other features suggestive of chorioamnionitis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 26; IBM Corp.). The Independent sample t-test was used to compare the continuous variables. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. A two-tailed P-value ≤0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

A total number of 100 pregnant women experiencing preterm labour were included in the present study sample. The age distribution of the study sample ranged from 19-43 years. The majority of the participants were in the age group of 20-29 years. As regards residence, 83 (83.0%) participants were of urban residence. As regards the estimated pre-pregnancy BMI, 71 (71.0%) women were of normal weight, whereas 29 (29.0%) women were overweight or obese, as demonstrated in Table I.

Table I

Basic characteristics of the study sample.

Table I

Basic characteristics of the study sample.

Basic characteristicsFrequencyPercentage
Age  
     <20 years11.0
     20-29 years4848.0
     30-39years4141.0
     ≥40 years1010.0
Residence  
     Urban8383.0
     Rural1717.0
Estimated pre-pregnancy BMI  
     Normal weight (estimated BMI, 18.5-25.0 kg/m2)7171.0
     Overweight or obese (estimated BMI, >25.0 kg/m2)2929.0
Smoking status  
     Yes00.0
     No100100.0

[i] BMI, body mass index.

In relation to the chief complaint of preterm labour, abdominal pain was the most common presentation (93%), followed by vaginal discharge (4%) and decreased foetal movement (3%). As regards a past history of diabetes mellitus (DM), 10 (10%) patients had DM (gestational and non-gestational), as presented in Table II.

Table II

Clinical characteristics of the study sample.

Table II

Clinical characteristics of the study sample.

Clinical characteristicFrequencyPercentage
Chief complaint  
     Abdominal pain9393.0
     Vaginal discharge44.0
     Decreased foetal movement33.0
Patients with diabetes mellitus  
     Yes1010.0
     No9090.0

The gestational age of the women ranged from 30-36.6 weeks, with a mean of 35.1 weeks (±1.1 SD). A total of 15 (15%) patients experienced preterm labour at 28-32 weeks, while 85 (85%) women experienced preterm labour at ≥32 weeks. As regards parity, the majority of the patients (78%) were multiparous. As regards previous miscarriages, 24 (24.0%) patients had a history of previous miscarriage. As regards the type of delivery, the majority (91.0%) underwent normal vaginal delivery, as presented in Table III.

Table III

Obstetric characteristics of the study sample.

Table III

Obstetric characteristics of the study sample.

Obstetric characteristicsFrequencyPercentage
Gestational age at labour  
     28-31 +6 weeks1515.0
     32-33 +6 weeks1414.0
     34-36 +6 weeks7171.0
Parity  
     Nulliparous99.0
     Primiparous1313.0
     Multiparous7878.0
History of previous miscarriage  
     Yes2424.0
     No7676.0
Type of delivery  
     Normal vaginal delivery9191.0
     Caesarean section99.0

With respect to neonatal outcomes, 60 (60.0%) neonates were discharged within a few hours, 25 (25.0%) were admitted for <1 week, 8 (8.0%) were admitted for >1 week and 7 (7.0%) did not survive, as demonstrated in Table IV.

Table IV

Neonatal outcomes of the studied sample

Table IV

Neonatal outcomes of the studied sample

Neonatal outcomesFrequencyPercentage
Discharged in <24 h6060.0
Discharged within 1 week2525.0
Discharged after >1 week88.0
Did not survive77.0

In relation to maternal GBS colonisation, 8 (8.0%) patients had a positive infection detected by a vaginal and anal swab, while 92 (92%) tested negative. As demonstrated in Table V, GBS positivity was significantly associated with both a higher pre-pregnancy BMI and diabetes, as 87.5% of the GBS-positive women were overweight or obese (P=0.001) and 62.5% had diabetes (P<0.001), compared to markedly lower proportions in the GBS-negative group. By contrast, there were no statistically significant associations between the GBS status and age (P=0.831), residence (P=0.133), or parity (P=0.815).

Table V

Association between study parameters and group B streptococcal colonisation.

Table V

Association between study parameters and group B streptococcal colonisation.

 GBS, n (%) 
ParameterPositiveNegativeP-value
Age   
     <20 years0 (0.0%)1 (1.1%)0.831a
     <30 years3 (37.5%)45 (48.9%) 
     30-39 years2 (25.0%)39 (42.4%) 
     ≥40 years3 (37.5%)7 (7.6%) 
Mean ± SD32.9±7.331.6±6.2 
Residence   
     Urban5 (62.5%)78 (84.8%)0.133b
     Rural3 (37.5%)14 (15.2%) 
Estimated pre-pregnancy BMI   
     Normal weight (estimated BMI, 18.5-25.0 kg/m2)1 (12.5%)70 (76.1%)0.001b
     Overweight or obese (estimated BMI, >25.0 kg/m2)7 (87.5%)22 (23.9%) 
Diabetes   
     Yes5 (62.5%)3 (3.3%) <0.001b
     No3 (37.5%)89 (96.7%) 
Parity   
     Nulliparous1 (12.5%)8 (8.7%)0.815b
     Primiparous1 (12.5%)12 (13.0%) 
     Multiparous6 (75.0%)72 (78.3%) 

[i] BMI, body mass index. Data were analysed using an

[ii] aindependent samples t-test or

[iii] bFisher's exact test.

A positive GBS colonisation was significantly associated with a lower gestational age at birth and a poor neonatal survival, as demonstrated in Table VI. Statistical analysis revealed that neonates who had an early neonatal death, had a significantly lower gestational age than neonates who survived, as demonstrated in Table VII. The cause of death in all neonates was respiratory distress.

Table VI

Adverse outcomes associated with GBS colonisation.

Table VI

Adverse outcomes associated with GBS colonisation.

 GBS, n (%) 
ParameterPositive (n=8)Negative (n=92)P-value
Gestational age at birth   
     28-31 +6 weeks6 (75.0%)9 (9.8%) <0.001a
     32-33 +6 weeks1 (12.5%)13 (14.1%) 
     34-36 +6 weeks1 (12.5%)70 (76.1%) 
Mean ± SD31.1±2.335.4±4.6 
Final neonatal outcome   
     Immediate discharge0 (0.0%)60 (65.2%) <0.001b
     Admitted for <1 week2 (25.0%)23 (25.0%) 
     Admitted for >1 week1 (12.5%)7 (7.6%) 
     Did not survive5 (62.5%)2 (2.2%) 

[i] Data were analysed using an

[ii] aindependent samples t-test or

[iii] bFisher's exact test.

Table VII

Association of survival with gestational age.

Table VII

Association of survival with gestational age.

 Neonatal survival, n (%) 
Gestational age at birthDid not survive (n=7)Survived (n=93)P-value
28-31+6 weeks6 (85.7%)9 (9.7%) <0.001a
32-33 +6 weeks1 (14.3%)13 (14.0%) 
34-36 +6 weeks0 (0.0%)71 (76.3%) 
Mean ± SD30.2±1.835.8±4.5 

[i] aData were analysed using an independent samples t-test.

Discussion

Prevalence and association with a low gestational age at birth

The present study revealed that GBS was identified in 8% of women experiencing premature labour. Notably, GBS colonisation was more likely to be associated with early preterm (28-32 weeks), rather than late preterm (32-37 weeks) labour. A previous study conducted in Denmark by Feikin et al (9) found that among 84 women experiencing preterm labour, 14% were colonised at delivery with GBS. The study by Schwab et al (10) in Indonesia, included 23 women (term and preterm) and reported that 8/23 (35%) had GBS.

It is important to highlight the low prevalence of GBS that was detected in the present study. The previous meta-analysis by Ashary et al (8) identified three parameters that were associated with improving the detection of GBS: i) The site of sample collection: Studies that employed a rectovaginal sample reported higher detection rates than studies relying of vaginal samples alone. ii) Enrichment prior to culture: The meta-analysis reported that enrichment increased the detection rate of GBS by almost 2-fold compared to studies that did not use enrichment. iii) Detection method: The prevalence of GBS determined by the culture approach was calculated at 7.4%, but the immunological method indicated a frequency of 11.6%. Compared to the cultural and immunological approaches, the identification of GBS by molecular techniques yielded a high prevalence of 62% (8).

Although a rectovaginal sample was used in the present study, culture enrichment was not performed with the recommended sheep blood agar that increased detection. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the prevalence would significantly increase if culture enrichment and immunological or molecular approaches were employed in Iraq.

Factors associated with GBS colonisation

In the present study, obesity was significantly associated with GBS colonisation. This finding is in concordance with the study by Dahan-Saal et al (11), who reported that obesity was the most prevalent determinant of GBS colonisation, as it increased the risk of acquiring GBS by 19%. In the USA, the study by Stapelton et al (12) included 1,20,000 pregnant women and reported a 20% increase in the risk of miscarriage in moderately obese women (BMI, 30-40) and a 40% increase in cases of morbid obesity (BMI, ≥40). In another study, Kleweis et al (13) included 7,711 pregnant women and reported that obese gravidas were still 35% more likely than non-obese women to test positive for GBS. In the USA, Venkatesh et al (14) included 1,15,070 women with term deliveries and reported a significant rise in the frequency of GBS colonisation with a higher pre-pregnancy BMI.

The molecular mechanism behind heightened GBS colonisation in obese women remains unclear, while it may be associated with changes in the composition and functional characteristics of the gut microbiota.

In the present study, DM was also significantly linked to a higher rate of GBS infection. This finding is in concordance with the study by Field et al (15), who included 305 pregnant women and reported that women with an HbA1c level ≥6.5% were twice as likely to have GBS colonisation than women with an HbA1c level <6.5%. This association between DM and GBS colonisation may be attributed to the following reasons: i) DM alters immune cell function within the reproductive tract; and ii) glucose alters GBS growth and promotes biofilm production, which may promote colonisation (16).

Vertical transmission

A notable finding of the present study was that the proportion of vertical transmission of GBS was found to be 0%. This may be attributed to the study setting, as it was conducted in a tertiary centre, where intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics are administered early. In the USA, the CDC has reported that by using the strategy of maternal screening and the administration of intrapartum antibiotics, GBS infection among newborns has been reduced from 1.7-1.9 per 1,000 live births in the early 1990s, to 0.34-0.37 per 1,000 newborns in 2008(17). Yadeta (5) reported that all newborns exposed to IAP for ≥4 h were not colonised. However, newborns exposed to IAP for <4 h were colonised. The study by McNanley et al (18) demonstrated that the GBS vaginal colony counts decreased by 5-fold during 2 h of intravenous penicillin G administration and decreased by 50-fold within 4 h. Studies conducted in countries, such as Bangladesh and Eastern Ethiopia with limited access to IAP have reported vertical transmission rates as high as 38.0 and 45.02%, respectively (5,19).

Another reason for the low vertical transmission may be attributed to the small sample size of the present study. Other than IAP, Gizachew et al (20) reported that commitment to antenatal care follow-up was the most critical factor preventing vertical transmission, as pregnant mothers who attended four to five antenatal care visits throughout their pregnancy were 20.9% less likely to vertically transfer colonised GBS to their babies.

The demonstrated association of maternal GBS colonisation with preterm labour, highlights the importance of vaccination. In 2020, Procter et al (21) conducted a global analysis of 140 million pregnant women across 183 countries, and concluded that a GBS vaccination was successful in avoiding up to 4,07,000 preterm births.

In conclusion, although the present study found that vertical transmission can be controlled by the proper administration of IAP, babies of mothers with maternal colonisation had poor outcomes 5/8, (62.5% died), as GBS colonisation was significantly associated with A lower gestational age (which was significantly associated with neonatal mortality). Moreover, the present study effectively consolidated the association between maternal GBS and both DM and obesity. Therefore, women with DM and obesity require special attention for early detection, and therefore, the early management of their condition.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

LRAO collected the data and wrote the manuscript. NSA conceived and designed the analysis. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript. LRAO and NSA confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Verbal consent had been obtained from all participants prior to data collection. An official letter of approval (no. 338) was obtained from the Scientific Committee of the Scientific Council of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Iraqi Board for Health Specializations, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Madrid L, Seale AC, Kohli-Lynch M, Edmond KM, Lawn JE, Heath PT, Madhi SA, Baker CJ, Bartlett L, Cutland C, et al: Infant group B streptococcal disease incidence and serotypes worldwide: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 65:S160–S172. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Wang J, Zhang Y, Lin M, Bao J, Wang G, Dong R, Zou P, Chen Y, Li N, Zhang T, et al: Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and antibiotic resistance in China: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 22(5)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Shabayek S and Spellerberg B: Group B streptococcal colonization, molecular characteristics, and epidemiology. Front Microbiol. 9:2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Li S, Huang J, Chen Z, Guo D, Yao Z and Ye X: Antibiotic prevention for maternal group B streptococcal colonization on neonatal GBS-related adverse outcomes: A meta-analysis. Front Microbiol. 8(374)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Yadeta T, Worku A, Egata G, Seyoum B, Marami D and Berhane Y: Vertical transmission of group B Streptococcus and associated factors among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study, Eastern Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist. 11:397–404. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Hanna M and Noor A: Streptococcus group B. In: StatPearls (Internet). StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL, 2025.

7 

No authors listed. Prevention of group B Streptococcal early-onset disease in newborns: ACOG committee opinion summary, number 782. Obstet Gynecol. 134(1)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Ashary N, Singh A, Chhabria K and Modi D: Meta-analysis on prevalence of vaginal group B Streptococcus colonization and preterm births in India. J Matern Neonatal Med. 35:2923–2931. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Feikin DR, Thorsen P, Zywicki S, Arpi M, Westergaard JG and Schuchat A: Association between colonization with group B streptococci during pregnancy and preterm delivery among Danish women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 184:427–433. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Schwab FD, Zettler EK, Moh A, Schötzau A, Gross U and Günthert AR: Predictive factors for preterm delivery under rural conditions in post-tsunami Banda Aceh. J Perinat Med. 44:511–515. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Dahan-Saal J, Gérardin P, Robillard PY, Barau G, Bouveret A, Picot S, Fianu A and Boukerrou M: Determinants of group B Streptococcus maternal colonization and factors related to its vertical perinatal transmission: Case-control study. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 39:281–288. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In French).

12 

Stapleton RD, Kahn JM, Evans LE, Critchlow CW and Gardella CM: Risk factors for groupB streptococcal genitourinary tract colonization in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 106:1246–1252. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Kleweis SM, Cahill AG, Odibo AO and Tuuli MG: Maternal obesity and rectovaginal group B Streptococcus colonization at term. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2015(586767)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Venkatesh KK, Vladutiu CJ, Strauss RA, Thorp JM, Stringer JSA, Stamilio DM, Hughes BL and Dotters-Katz S: Association between maternal obesity and group B Streptococcus colonization in a National U.S. Cohort. J Women's Heal. 29:1507–1512. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Field C, Bank TC, Spees CK, Germann K, Landon MB, Gabbe S, Grobman WA, Costantine MM and Venkatesh KK: Association between glycemic control and group B Streptococcus colonization among pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 90(e13779)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Nguyen LM, Omage JI, Noble K, McNew KL, Moore DJ, Aronoff DM and Doster RS: Group B streptococcal infection of the genitourinary tract in pregnant and non-pregnant patients with diabetes mellitus: An immunocompromised host or something more? Am J Reprod Immunol. 86(e13501)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Verani JR, McGee L and Schrag SJ: Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases C for DC and P (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease-Revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 59:1–36. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

18 

McNanley AR, Glantz JC, Hardy DJ and Vicino D: The effect of intrapartum penicillin on vaginal group B Streptococcus colony counts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 197:583.e1–4. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Saha SK, Ahmed ZB, Modak JK, Naziat H, Saha S, Uddin MA, Islam M, Baqui AH, Darmstadt GL and Schrag SJ: Group B Streptococcus among pregnant women and newborns in Mirzapur, Bangladesh: Colonization, vertical transmission, and serotype distribution. J Clin Microbiol. 55:2406–2412. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Gizachew M, Tiruneh M, Moges F, Adefris M, Tigabu Z and Tessema B: Proportion of Streptococcus agalactiae vertical transmission and associated risk factors among Ethiopian mother-newborn dyads, Northwest Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 10(3477)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Procter SR, Gonçalves BP, Paul P, Chandna J, Seedat F, Koukounari A, Hutubessy R, Trotter C, Lawn JE and Jit M: Maternal immunisation against Group B Streptococcus: A global analysis of health impact and cost-effectiveness. PLoS Med. 20(e1004068)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Al‑Obaidi LR and Alkhalil NS: Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes. World Acad Sci J 7: 107, 2025.
APA
Al‑Obaidi, L.R., & Alkhalil, N.S. (2025). Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes. World Academy of Sciences Journal, 7, 107. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2025.395
MLA
Al‑Obaidi, L. R., Alkhalil, N. S."Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes". World Academy of Sciences Journal 7.6 (2025): 107.
Chicago
Al‑Obaidi, L. R., Alkhalil, N. S."Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes". World Academy of Sciences Journal 7, no. 6 (2025): 107. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2025.395
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Al‑Obaidi LR and Alkhalil NS: Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes. World Acad Sci J 7: 107, 2025.
APA
Al‑Obaidi, L.R., & Alkhalil, N.S. (2025). Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes. World Academy of Sciences Journal, 7, 107. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2025.395
MLA
Al‑Obaidi, L. R., Alkhalil, N. S."Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes". World Academy of Sciences Journal 7.6 (2025): 107.
Chicago
Al‑Obaidi, L. R., Alkhalil, N. S."Incidence and risk factors for group B <em>Streptococcus</em> colonisation in pregnant women experiencing preterm labour and neonatal outcomes". World Academy of Sciences Journal 7, no. 6 (2025): 107. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2025.395
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team