International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science that involves simulating human intelligence in machines, particularly computer systems, to perform cognitive functions, such as learning, reasoning and self-correction with increased speed and accuracy (1). While standard software follows manually pre-defined processing steps to reach a result, AI tools use mathematical algorithms to independently identify patterns and leverage connections between inputs and desired outputs (2). John McCarthy coined the term ‘artificial intelligence’ around 1955 to refer to the ability of machines to perform tasks associated with intelligent behaviour (3), and in 1950, Alan Turing formulated the Turing test to evaluate whether a machine could demonstrate intelligence comparable to that of a human (4).
In the field of dentistry, particularly periodontology, AI and machine learning (ML) models are driving a marked transformation by integrating large volumes of clinical, radiographic and molecular data. AI enhances the accuracy, efficiency and consistency of diagnosis, treatment planning and patient management (1). Periodontal diseases, which range from gingivitis to periodontitis, are widespread and pose a substantial global health burden, affecting a large segment of the population and contributing to oral health issues worldwide (5). Accurate identification and diagnosis are challenging for clinicians owing to subjectivity, time constraints and inconsistencies in radiographic angulation and probing pressure inherent to conventional diagnostic methods in periodontology (6). AI provides a feasible option with which to overcome these limitations by potentially improving patient outcomes, treatment planning and diagnostic accuracy. The use of AI techniques in periodontal applications has exhibited a notable increase in publications since 2019, indicating that the field is gaining interest and has the potential to be revolutionised by AI (4,7).
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which form the foundation of medical image analysis in periodontology and can extract features from high-dimensional imaging data, are frequently employed in AI models (8,9). A range of data types are utilised as input, including genetic information, salivary biomarkers, clinical records, panoramic, periapical, bitewing, intra-oral and fluorescent images (7,9,10).
However, despite encouraging progress, the integration of AI into periodontology remains incomplete and faces several significant translational barriers (4,7). A key limitation is the insufficient understanding of AI principles among clinicians, combined with limited awareness of its practical applications and ongoing concerns regarding the reliability of AI-derived outputs (11). At the evidence level, marked heterogeneity in study designs, analytical methods and reported outcomes restricts interstudy comparability and limits the potential for robust evidence synthesis (2). Moreover, unresolved issues related to data quality, lack of standardised protocols, limited applicability across diverse populations and ethical concerns, including data privacy and security, continue to impede broader clinical implementation (6).
The application of AI in clinical settings could herald a new era of precision medicine for periodontal care in which treatment and diagnostic plans are customised to the individual needs of each patient (1,12). To provide a comprehensive perspective for both clinicians and researchers, the present narrative review aimed to summarise recent advances in AI-driven periodontal diagnostics and therapeutics, discuss the available data and explore potential future pathways in AI-based periodontology.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies published between 2020 and 2025 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The search was limited to articles in the English language. The search items included combinations of AI-related keywords (‘artificial intelligence’, ‘machine learning’, ‘deep learning’ and ‘neural networks’) and periodontal terms (‘periodontitis’, ‘periodontal disease’ and ‘dental diagnostics’) with Boolean operators (AND/OR). Reference lists of included articles were also hand-searched for additional relevant studies.
By providing advanced tools to enhance the diagnosis, monitoring and general management of periodontal diseases, AI is transforming healthcare, including the specialised field of periodontology (13). Conventional periodontal diagnosis relies predominantly on manual assessments, including clinical examination, periodontal probing to measure pocket depth and visual interpretation of radiographs. These methods are inherently subjective and prone to significant inter- and intra-operator variability, influenced by factors, such as probing force, radiographic angulation and clinician experience (12). AI provides a promising strategy with which to overcome these limitations by improving diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning and patient outcomes (6).
AI models, particularly deep learning models such as CNNs, have shown considerable potential in periodontal radiographic analysis (14). These models have been utilised on periapical, bitewing and panoramic radiographs, and on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) primarily for detecting and quantifying alveolar bone loss, a key parameter in periodontitis diagnosis and assessment (9,15). Reported accuracies ranging from 73 to 99% demonstrate strong diagnostic capability; however, this variation also suggests that performance is influenced by factors, such as dataset quality, imaging modality, annotation standards and model architecture. Although certain studies have reported results comparable to or better than those of experienced clinicians, these findings need to be interpreted with caution as performance in controlled settings may not translate directly to routine clinical practice. For instance, a CNN model exhibiting 94% sensitivity and 88% specificity reflects strong potential but does not, on its own, confirm generalisability or reproducibility. More advanced architectures, such as vision transformers, have demonstrated improved performance on specific tasks, including furcation classification, suggesting that newer models may enhance radiographic interpretation (4,8,9). Beyond detection, AI has also demonstrated value in assisting with the staging and grading of periodontitis based on bone loss severity (8,14).
AI exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in identifying locations with or without gingival inflammation (16). AI detects dental plaque using intra-oral photographs or fluorescence images with an accuracy of 73.6-99% (7). In addition, AI has been employed to classify periodontal disease from intra-oral images, achieving diagnostic accuracy of 47-81% (6). ANNs can distinguish between aggressive and chronic periodontitis using immunologic parameters with 90-98% accuracy (9). AI systems have demonstrated notable abilities in detecting complex defects, such as intra-bony lesions and furcation involvements, in CBCT images and panoramic radiographs, thereby enhancing assessment precision and treatment planning (8,14). Furthermore, AI systems can analyse unstructured clinical notes using natural language processing (NLP) to extract relevant information about the periodontal health of a patient, enabling the rapid retrieval of patient history and supporting treatment planning (4,12).
AI assists in devising a treatment plan by enabling the development of personalised strategies that support clinical decision-making (17).
AI algorithms analyse patient-specific data to develop customised treatment plans. This data may include periodontal evaluations, genetic markers, medical history, risk factors and imaging results (18,19). This method aligns with the principles of precision medicine (1). AI-enhanced tools can incorporate patient preferences and clinical guidelines to improve treatment adherence and promote long-term oral health outcomes (6).
AI systems can optimise non-surgical therapy by providing real-time guidance during procedures, such as scaling and root planning, and by analysing patterns of therapeutic response (6,20). Predictive models can forecast disease progression or treatment outcomes to assist in planning (1). For instance, in a previous study, a random forest model trained on patient, clinical, microbiological and treatment data predicted 1-year post-therapy responses (21). AI-powered smartphone applications and smart toothbrushes (e.g., DENTAL MONITORING® software) enable patients to obtain intra-oral images at home for real-time monitoring of oral hygiene and gum condition. This monitoring has been shown to improve periodontal status post-treatment and increase adherence to dental plaque control (1,22). Moreover, wearable diagnostic tools, such as smart mouthguards and sensor-embedded dental implants, provide real-time monitoring of oral conditions (22,23).
AI is widely used for implant treatment planning, especially with CBCT scans. AI models can identify the jawbone, sinus anatomy, nerves and existing teeth on CBCT scans, greatly enhancing implant placement accuracy (4,5,8). Robotic-assisted implant placement has demonstrated higher precision than freehand methods (24). AI models also exhibit high accuracy (93.8-98%) in recognising implant types from radiographs (4). In general surgery, AI-powered software can simulate surgeries and guide clinicians during operations, resulting in improved surgical outcomes and fewer complications (19).
AI is increasingly integrated into oral health devices and applications. Smart toothbrushes utilise sensors and algorithms to guide brushing. For example, Li et al (25) conducted a randomised trial comparing conventional care with an AI-enabled multimodal-sensing toothbrush (AI-MST) combined with personalised application feedback as an adjunct to standard periodontal therapy. After 6 months, the AI-MST group exhibited significantly improved outcomes: Only 44.4% of periodontal pockets remained inflamed compared with 52.3% in the control group. Furthermore, the test group achieved superior oral hygiene scores (25). This finding illustrates that AI-driven oral hygiene coaching can boost patient adherence and improve treatment efficacy. AI toothbrushes can advise patients on brushing pressure and timing, offering real-time feedback. Micro-robotic flossers and AI toothbrushes can automatically target biofilm in hard-to-reach areas. Clinicians may particularly recommend these for patients with poor dexterity or compliance (26). Mobile health applications complement these gadgets; AI-powered applications and wearables monitor brushing frequency, technique and other habits, providing personalised reminders and tips (6).
AI provides a revolutionary and objective approach to halitosis detection and monitoring, notably via the development of AI-powered electronic nose systems (27). AI systems for halitosis detection are based on artificial olfaction, also known as ‘electronic noses’. These systems combine principles of mammalian olfaction with AI to identify specific smell patterns. These systems use an array of non-selective sensors to assess the entire spectrum of exhaled volatile compounds (4,27). Nanomaterial-based sensor arrays coupled with ML algorithms have demonstrated remarkable capabilities. For example, systems comprising 32 metal-oxide sensors integrated with ML algorithms have achieved 98.1% accuracy in distinguishing various biological conditions by profiling volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (27,28). Deep neural networks (such as multi-layer perceptrons, CNNs and long short-term memory networks) are employed to interpret complex VOC patterns, capturing full VOC signatures rather than just volatile sulphur compounds, thereby enabling more accurate diagnosis and monitoring. To facilitate explainable analysis, the platform ‘OdoriFy’ uses a deep neural network to identify individual odorant molecules as malodorous and to predict their interactions with olfactory receptors (27).
AI is being used to analyse salivary and gingival crevicular fluid biomarkers to detect and treat periodontal diseases (29). These biological fluids are abundant and non-invasive sources of molecular indicators that reflect the overall state of periodontal and systemic health. Large datasets are generated from these fluids using ‘omics’ technologies (metabolome, microbiome, proteome, etc.), which are ideally suited for AI analysis to enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of periodontal disease (1,30).
ML models trained on salivary counts of nine key periodontal bacteria have achieved 93% accuracy in distinguishing healthy from moderate or severe periodontitis, indicating that specific combinations of bacteria in saliva are effective biomarkers for disease severity (29). Support vector machine analysis using subgingival microbial profiles successfully classified periodontal status and distinguished between aggressive and chronic periodontitis with high accuracy (14). An ANN utilised immunologic parameters (e.g., leucocyte counts, interleukins and IgG antibody titres) to differentiate aggressive from chronic periodontitis with 90-98% accuracy (3).
AI has introduced autonomous robotic systems capable of performing dental procedures with sub-millimetre precision. The Yomi™ robot, for instance, is an FDA-approved robotic platform for dental implant surgery that employs AI algorithms for detailed surgical planning and provides real-time feedback to the surgeon (24,30,31). AI-driven robotics facilitates minimally invasive surgical techniques, which can minimise surgical trauma and promote rapid healing (30). For comprehensive treatment planning and precise surgical execution, these systems integrate with digital dental workflows, combining data from intra-oral scanners, CBCT and AI analysis. Real-time tissue characterisation and surgical planning adjustments are enabled by the synergy of AI and advanced imaging technologies. With this capability, surgeons can adapt their techniques to the individual anatomy and tissue properties of each patient.
Surgeons can visualise and rehearse procedures beforehand using surgical planning environments enabled by the integration of AI and mixed reality technologies. This approach reduces the learning curve for complex periodontal procedures while significantly enhancing surgical accuracy (32). A detailed summary of various AI tools, their specific applications and reported performance outcomes in periodontal diagnostics and therapeutics is provided in Table I.
Forensic periodontology is crucial in identifying individuals, particularly in cases involving decomposed bodies, large-scale disasters or criminal investigations. The use of AI in forensic periodontal assessment represents a notable advancement in both accuracy and efficiency of identification. AI technologies can analyse periodontal patterns, bone loss configurations and dental traits to assist in personal identification procedures (33-35).
AI algorithms are highly adept at estimating age and sex based on periodontal characteristics. ML models analysing panoramic radiographs can estimate chronological age with accuracy that approaches that of experienced forensic odontologists (36,37). These systems examine patterns of alveolar bone remodelling, modifications in the periodontal ligament space and root resorption that occur with ageing. Deep learning models utilising CNNs can automatically segment dental structures and measure relevant parameters for age estimation, thereby significantly reducing analysis time while maintaining high accuracy (37). The integration of multiple dental and periodontal parameters improves the reliability of age estimation protocols.
AI systems excel at recognising complex patterns in periodontal anatomy that are relevant to forensic identification. ML algorithms can analyse combinations of features, including alveolar crest morphology, interproximal bone levels, root surface characteristics and periodontal defect patterns, to generate unique dental profiles (36,38). The development of automated comparison systems enables the rapid screening of ante-mortem and post-mortem dental records, significantly accelerating the identification process in mass-casualty scenarios. These systems can handle large databases of dental records and pinpoint potential matches based on periodontal characteristics (33,38).
AI-assisted dental monitoring, whether used alone or in combination with health counselling, benefits both treatment outcomes and the long-term OHRQoL for patients with periodontitis. In a previous study, AI-monitoring groups demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in OHRQoL at the 6-month follow-up compared with the control group (34). AI-assisted dental monitoring reminds patients with periodontitis to maintain proper dental hygiene at home. This technology analyses intra-oral images obtained by the patient at home, evaluates the current oral and gum health of the patient, and provides timely reminders and targeted recommendations to enhance patient engagement and convenience. AI reduces plaque accumulation and improves the effectiveness of periodontal treatment by encouraging self-care habits (14,34).
Studies have demonstrated that AI-assisted monitoring combined with human counselling (AIHC) results in improved treatment outcomes and greater improvements in OHRQoL compared with patients who receive only AI monitoring or standard care. The AIHC group demonstrated a greater improvement in OHRQoL than the AI-only group at the 3-month follow-up. In addition, the AIHC group showed greater improvement in OHRQoL at the 6-month follow-up compared with their baseline (22,34).
Future research and development in AI for periodontology is warranted to focus on enhancing explainability and clinical relevance. Creating explainable AI systems that provide transparent and interpretable reasoning for their predictions is vital to building trust among clinicians and patients (35). Moreover, further research is required to highlight multimodal data fusion, combining clinical, imaging and molecular datasets, such as genomic and salivary biomarkers, in order to achieve a more precise, comprehensive understanding of periodontal disease dynamics (1,35). AI models need to advance to predict clinically significant outcomes, including disease severity, progression and personalised treatment responses, aligning with standardised diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks (14,39). The main limitations and the corresponding research directions to address them are outlined in Table II.
Equally critical is the need for longitudinal and prospective validation studies to evaluate AI model performance in predicting real-world disease trajectories and treatment outcomes, moving beyond the limitations of retrospective designs (6,9,14). Seamless clinical integration should also be a key focus. AI tools need to be interoperable, user-friendly and adaptable to existing dental workflows, with the potential for real-time disease monitoring via smart or home-based devices (8,14). Finally, rigorous comparative studies between AI and human clinicians using standardised datasets are essential to define the true capabilities and limits of AI in periodontal diagnosis and management (14).
AI is transforming periodontology by improving diagnostics, treatment planning and patient management. Tools such as CNNs, ANNs and NLP enable the precise detection of periodontal diseases, bone loss, gingival inflammation and complex defects from radiographs, intra-oral images, biomarkers and clinical data. Furthermore, AI supports personalised treatment protocols, the optimisation of non-surgical therapies, surgical or implant planning, smart oral health devices, halitosis detection, biomarker analysis and robotic-assisted procedures. In addition, it aids forensic applications such as age and sex determination and automated dental record matching.
However, in order to fully realise this potential, several challenges need to be addressed, including inconsistent data quality, lack of standardised protocols, limited generalisability and ethical concerns, such as privacy and patient trust. Large-scale, demographically diverse validation studies, interpretable AI models, federated learning for secure collaboration and robust cost-effectiveness research are necessary. Integration into clinical workflows requires investment in infrastructure, practitioner training and effective patient communication, while bridging the digital divide remains essential. Future progress depends on collaboration among clinicians, researchers, developers and regulators to ensure safe, ethical and equitable adoption. As AI merges with augmented reality/virtual reality, advanced sensors and mobile platforms, it promises to expand access and precision in periodontal care, ultimately improving global oral health outcomes.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
Not applicable.
RC and NS were involved in designing the concept of the study followed by conducting the search and drafting the manuscript. DGK, SS and AS were involved in revising and initial literature search. Data authentication is not applicable. All the authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
During the preparation of this work, AI tools were used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript or to generate images, and subsequently, the authors revised and edited the content produced by the AI tools as necessary, taking full responsibility for the ultimate content of the present manuscript.
|
Pitchika V, Büttner M and Schwendicke F: Artificial intelligence and personalized diagnostics in periodontology: A narrative review. Periodontology. 95:220–231. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Scott J, Biancardi AM, Jones O and Andrew D: Artificial intelligence in periodontology: A scoping review. Dentistry J. 11(43)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sachdeva S, Mani A, Vora H, Saluja H, Mani S and Manka N: Artificial intelligence in periodontics: A dip in the future. JCB. 7:119–124. 2021. | |
|
Khan SF, Siddique A, Khan AM, Shetty B and Fazal I: Artificial intelligence in periodontology and implantology-a narrative review. J Med Artif Intell. 7(6)2024. | |
|
Anagol R: Artificial intelligence-the sprouting seed in periodontology & implantology. Int J. 7(496)2024. | |
|
Patel MS, Kumar S, Patel B, Patel SN, Girdhar GA, Patadiya HH, Hirani T and Haque M: Impact of artificial intelligence on periodontology: A review. Cureus. 17(e81162)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Inam W, Kan JYK, Kois JC and Akal O: Artificial intelligence models for diagnosing gingivitis and periodontal disease: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 130:816–824. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chatzopoulos GS, Koidou VP, Tsalikis L and Kaklamanos EG: Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in periodontology: A scoping review. Medicina (Kaunas). 61(1066)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Polizzi A, Quinzi V, Lo Giudice A, Marzo G, Leonardi R and Isola G: Accuracy of artificial intelligence models in the prediction of periodontitis: A systematic review. JDR Clin Trans Res. 9:312–324. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Aykol Şahin G: Advances in artificial intelligence-aided intraoral imaging analysis in periodontics. Black Sea J Health Sci. 7:218–225. 2024. | |
|
Chawla RL, Gadge NP, Ronad S, Waghmare A, Patil A and Deshmukh G: Knowledge, attitude and perception regarding artificial intelligence in periodontology: A questionnaire study. Cureus. 15(e48309)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sarakbi RM, Varma SR, Muthiah Annamma L and Sivaswamy V: Implications of artificial intelligence in periodontal treatment maintenance: A scoping review. Front Oral Health. 6(1561128)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shirmohammadi A and Ghertasi Oskouei S: The growing footprint of artificial intelligence in periodontology & implant dentistry. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 15:1–2. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ferrara E, Rapone B and D'Albenzio A: Applications of deep learning in periodontal disease diagnosis and management: A systematic review and critical appraisal. J Med Artif Intell. 8(23)2025. | |
|
Uzun Saylan BC, Baydar O, Yeşilova E, Kurt Bayrakdar S, Bilgir E, Bayrakdar İŞ, Çelik Ö and Orhan K: Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence models for detecting alveolar bone loss in periodontal disease: A panoramic radiograph study. Diagnostics (Basel). 13(1800)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chau RCW, Li GH, Tew IM, Thu KM, McGrath C, Lo WL, Ling WK, Hsung RT and Lam WYH: Accuracy of artificial intelligence-based photographic detection of gingivitis. Int Dent J. 73:724–730. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Parihar AS, Narang S, Tyagi S, Narang A, Dwivedi S, Katoch V and Laddha R: Artificial intelligence in periodontics: A comprehensive review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 16 (Suppl 3):S1956–S1958. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Aldughayfiq B, Ashfaq F, Jhanjhi NZ and Humayun M: YOLO-based deep learning model for pressure ulcer detection and classification. Healthcare (Basel). 11(1222)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Panahi O: Artificial intelligence: A new frontier in periodontology. Mod Res Dent. 8(000680)2024. | |
|
Rebeiz T, Lawand G, Martin W, Gonzaga L, Revilla-León M, Khalaf S and Megarbané JM: Development of an artificial intelligence model for assisting periodontal therapy decision-making: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study. J Dent. 159(105780)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Feher B, de Souza Oliveira EH, Mendes Duarte P, Werdich AA, Giannobile WV and Feres M: Machine learning-assisted prediction of clinical responses to periodontal treatment. J Periodontol. 96:1199–1212. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shen KL, Huang CL, Lin YC, Du JK, Chen FL, Kabasawa Y, Chen CC and Huang HL: Effects of artificial intelligence-assisted dental monitoring intervention in patients with periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Clinic Periodontol. 49:988–998. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Balaji Ganesh S and Sugumar K: Internet of things-A novel innovation in dentistry. J Adv Oral Res. 12:42–48. 2021. | |
|
Jain S, Sayed ME, Ibraheem WI, Ageeli AA, Gandhi S, Jokhadar HF, AlResayes SS, Alqarni H, Alshehri AH, Huthan HM, et al: Accuracy Comparison between Robot-assisted dental implant placement and Static/Dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Medicina (Kaunas). 60(11)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li Y, Wu X, Liu M, Deng K, Tullini A, Zhang X, Shi J, Lai H and Tonetti MS: Enhanced control of periodontitis by an artificial intelligence-enabled multimodal-sensing toothbrush and targeted mHealth micromessages: A randomized trial. J Clin Periodontol. 51:1632–1643. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Maini V, Roy R, Gandhi G, Chopra A and Bhat SG: Artificial-intelligence-based smart toothbrushes for oral health and patient education: A review. Hygiene. 5(5)2025. | |
|
Mathur A, Mehta V, Obulareddy VT and Kumar P: Narrative review on artificially intelligent olfaction in halitosis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 28:275–283. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shtepliuk I, Montelius K, Eriksson J and Puglisi D: Adaptive machine learning for electronic nose-based forensic VOC classification. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12(e04657)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kim EH, Kim S, Kim HJ, Jeong HO, Lee J, Jang J, Joo JY, Shin Y, Kang J, Park AK, et al: Prediction of chronic periodontitis severity using machine learning models based on salivary bacterial copy number. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10(571515)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pandey A: AI-powered robotic dentistry: The future of minimally invasive procedures. Acta Sci Clin Case Rep. 5:32–34. 2024. | |
|
Veseli E: The future of dentistry through robotics. Br Dent J. 238:76–77. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mangano FG, Yang KR, Lerner H, Admakin O and Mangano C: Artificial intelligence and mixed reality for dental implant planning: A technical note. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 26:942–953. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ashwini R and Dineja R: Scrutinized report of artificial intelligence in the field of dentistry and forensic odontology. J Forensic Sci Med. 11:6–10. 2025. | |
|
You FT, Lin PC, Huang CL, Wu JH, Kabasawa Y, Chen CC and Huang HL: Artificial intelligence with counseling on the treatment outcomes and quality of life in periodontitis patients. J Periodontol. 96:781–793. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang J, Deng S, Zou T, Jin Z and Jiang S: Artificial intelligence models for periodontitis classification: A systematic review. J Dent. 156(105690)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Vodanović M, Subašić M, Milošević D, Galić I and Brkić H: Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 41(30)2023.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kurniawan A, Novianti A, Lestari FA and Ramaniasari SM: Integrating artificial intelligence and adult dental age estimation in forensic identification: A literature review. World J Adv Res Rev. 21:1374–1379. 2024. | |
|
Hawkins ME, Suresh P, Nath SG, Raveendran R and Kumar VH: Forensic dentistry: A review on forensic periodontology and scope for application of artificial intelligence. Kerala Dent J. 47:40–46. 2024. | |
|
Herrera D, Tonetti MS, Chapple I, Kebschull M, Papapanou PN, Sculean A, Abusleme L, Aimetti M, Belibasakis G, Blanco J, et al: Consensus report of the 20th European Workshop on Periodontology: Contemporary and emerging technologies in periodontal diagnosis. J Clin Periodontol. 29 (Suppl 29):4–33. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Akram HM: Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Advancements in periodontology and other specialties, diagnosis, treatment planning, and ethical considerations. Dent Rev. 5(100157)2025. |