Potentiation of the antitumor activity of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo

  • Authors:
    • Tomohiro Emura
    • Norihiko Suzuki
    • Akio Fujioka
    • Hideyuki Ohshimo
    • Masakazu Fukushima
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 1, 2005     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.27.2.449
  • Pages: 449-455
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Trifluorothymidine (FTD) is a thymidine analog that exhibits an antitumor activity through its inhibition of thymidylate synthase and its incorporation into DNA. However, FTD is rapidly hydrolyzed to an inactive form by thymidine phosphorylase (TP). We attempted to augment the antitumor activity of FTD by combining it with a potent and reversible inhibitor of TP, 5-chloro-6-(2-imino-propyrrolidin-1-yl) methyl-2, 4 (1H, 3H)-pyrimidinedione hydrochloride (TPI) in human tumor xenografts with a low sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. The optimum ratio of TPI to FTD was determined by measuring the maximum plasma level of FTD after oral administration and the antitumor effect of FTD on human tumor xenografts in mice. When >0.5 M of TPI and 1 M of FTD (10 mg/kg) were co-administered, the plasma FTD levels in mice and monkeys were elevated, almost reaching a maximal and constant value of 20-30 µg/ml and 15 µg/ml, respectively. When human gastrointestinal cancer cell lines (DLD-1, CO-3 and AZ521) were xenografted into nude mice, the antitumor activity of FTD was augmented by the co-administration of TPI, compared to that of FTD alone, and the ED50 value, used to indicate the antitumor effect, reached a maximum value (about 25, 20, and 10 mg/kg in the DLD-1, CO-3, and AZ521 tumors, respectively) when >0.5 M of TPI was combined with 1 M of FTD. The oral administration of TPI markedly improved the FTD-induced toxicity, as evaluated by the decrease in the body weight of the mice. These results suggested that the optimum ratio of FTD to TPI was 1:0.5 M, enabling a high antitumor activity and a low toxicity. We further evaluated whether TPI inhibits TP-induced angiogenesis in a gelatin-sponge mouse model, based on the finding that TP is identical to platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor. Ten and 30 mg/kg administration of TPI significantly inhibited TP-induced neovascularization in a dose-dependent manner in a mouse model. The above results suggest that the combination of TPI and an antitumor nucleoside, FTD, not only enhances the antitumor efficacy and decreases the toxicity of FTD, but also suppresses TP-induced angiogenesis.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August 2005
Volume 27 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Emura T, Suzuki N, Fujioka A, Ohshimo H and Fukushima M: Potentiation of the antitumor activity of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo. Int J Oncol 27: 449-455, 2005
APA
Emura, T., Suzuki, N., Fujioka, A., Ohshimo, H., & Fukushima, M. (2005). Potentiation of the antitumor activity of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo. International Journal of Oncology, 27, 449-455. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.27.2.449
MLA
Emura, T., Suzuki, N., Fujioka, A., Ohshimo, H., Fukushima, M."Potentiation of the antitumor activity of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo". International Journal of Oncology 27.2 (2005): 449-455.
Chicago
Emura, T., Suzuki, N., Fujioka, A., Ohshimo, H., Fukushima, M."Potentiation of the antitumor activity of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo". International Journal of Oncology 27, no. 2 (2005): 449-455. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.27.2.449