Open Access

High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk

  • Authors:
    • Polat Dura
    • Jody Salomon
    • Rene H.M. te Morsche
    • Hennie M.J. Roelofs
    • Jon O. Kristinsson
    • Theo Wobbes
    • Ben J.M. Witteman
    • Adriaan C.I.T.L. Tan
    • Joost P.H. Drenth
    • Wilbert H.M. Peters
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 22, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1385
  • Pages: 1789-1796
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Esophageal cancer (EC) has a globally increasing incidence with poor curative treatment options and survival rates. Environmental and dietary factors have crucial roles in esophageal carcinogenesis. Polymorphisms in the UGT genes, a superfamily of enzymes essential for the detoxification of carcinogens, may alter enzyme activity and subsequently may play a role in EC etiology. Rather than solely establishing differences in genotype distribution, we investigated whether functional polymorphisms in UGT genes that can predict enzyme activity in vivo, may influence EC risk. A case-control study including 351 Caucasian EC patients and 592 Caucasian controls was conducted and polymorphisms in seven UGT genes were determined, using the polymerase chain reaction. On the basis of allelic in vitro enzyme activity measurements, genotypes were categorized according to their predicted in vivo enzyme activity into high, medium and low categories. Predicted enzyme activity groups were combined and compared between patients and controls. The UGT1A1 and UGT1A8 predicted high enzyme activity genotypes were significantly more (OR=1.62; 95% CI, 1.02-2.56) and less frequent (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84) among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), respectively. High (OR=0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84) and medium (OR=0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52) activity UGT2B4 genotypes were significantly less often present in ESCC patients. No association was detected between UGT genotypes and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) risk. Polymorphisms in UGT genes, resulting in altered enzyme activity genotypes, do not seem modifiers of EAC risk. However, the predicted high activity UGT1A1 genotype, associated with low serum levels of the antioxidant bilirubin, was associated with an increased ESCC risk. The UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes associated with decreased predicted enzyme activities, were significantly associated with an increased risk of ESCC, probably by a decreased detoxification of carcinogens.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June 2012
Volume 40 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Dura P, Salomon J, te Morsche RH, Roelofs HM, Kristinsson JO, Wobbes T, Witteman BJ, Tan AC, Drenth JP, Peters WH, Peters WH, et al: High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk. Int J Oncol 40: 1789-1796, 2012
APA
Dura, P., Salomon, J., te Morsche, R.H., Roelofs, H.M., Kristinsson, J.O., Wobbes, T. ... Peters, W.H. (2012). High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk. International Journal of Oncology, 40, 1789-1796. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1385
MLA
Dura, P., Salomon, J., te Morsche, R. H., Roelofs, H. M., Kristinsson, J. O., Wobbes, T., Witteman, B. J., Tan, A. C., Drenth, J. P., Peters, W. H."High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk". International Journal of Oncology 40.6 (2012): 1789-1796.
Chicago
Dura, P., Salomon, J., te Morsche, R. H., Roelofs, H. M., Kristinsson, J. O., Wobbes, T., Witteman, B. J., Tan, A. C., Drenth, J. P., Peters, W. H."High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk". International Journal of Oncology 40, no. 6 (2012): 1789-1796. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1385