This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major health problem and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, representing the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths (1). In 2012, GC caused 723,000 new deaths in the world (2) because of its poor prognosis and the limited efficacy of the treatment. It is widely accepted that environmental factors, such as Helicobacter pylori infections (3), Epstein-Barr viruses, diet, smoking and obesity, contribute to gastric carcinogenesis (4). Additionally, genetic factors have been implicated in GC development, including somatic mutations, gene amplifications and deletions, epigenetic inactivation of several genes, and aberrant DNA methylation (5,6). Molecular profiling of GCs has been performed using gene expression or DNA sequencing, which has facilitated the identification of putative biomarkers for subtype classification, prognosis and therapeutic targets (7–9). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the progression of gastric carcinoma are still poorly understood. Besides protein coding genes, recent evidence has shown that there is an important role for microRNAs (miRs) in human cancers (10). miRs are short (~22 nucleotides), non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression primarily by translational repression or transcriptional degradation, and are involved in cellular processes such as cell proliferation, cell death, and tumorigenesis (11–13). Studies have suggested that there are oncogenic and tumor suppressive roles for miRs in cancers (14,15). miRs have great potential as cancer biomarkers in terms of their tissue-specific expression and aberrant expression in cancer cells (16) based on data from high-throughput microarray analysis. In GC, aberrant miR expression profiles have been associated with GC progression, prognosis (17,18) and pathogenesis by perturbing the function of its target genes (19–22).

miR-148a is one of the most significantly downregulated miRs in GC cell lines, GC tissue samples, and in GC patients compared with adjacent normal gastric tissues (23–25). Therefore, the aberrant expression of miR-148a suggests that it may be involved in GC progression. In this study, we used MNNG (N-methyl-N9-nitroN-nitrosoguanidine) treatment to establish a rat GC model, and used the human GC cell lines AGS, YCC3 and BGC-823 to investigate the effects of miR-148a on the development and progression of GC.

Material and methods

Animals

Forty-four one-week-old, grade 3, male Wistar rats (approximately 50 g in weight) were supplied by the Experimental Animal Center (Hubei, China) and kept in a room under a 12 h artificial light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. Acclimatization period of one week was observed prior to the initiation of experimentation. The procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Wuhan University and complied with the recommendations of the Chinese guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Cell culture

GC cell lines (AGS, YCC3, SCH and BGC-823 cells) were grown in DMEM (Hyclone, HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified chamber. YCC3 and SCH cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI-1640; Hyclone, HyClone Laboratories) containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified chamber.

Drug treatments

MNNG (Fluka, Germany) solution was prepared three times per week with distilled water at a concentration of 100 mg/ml. The solution was protected from light and given ad libitum to the animals in their drinking water. In addition to MNNG, all animals were given 1 ml of 10% sodium chloride weekly by oral gavage in the initial six weeks of the study to enhance GC development. MNNG and control PBS were administered by oral gavage daily from the age of six weeks for a total of 40 weeks.

Plasmid construction and transfection

The fragments encoding primary miRs were cloned into the pcDNA-3.1(-) vector (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA, USA) following digestion with Xhol/BamHI (Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA). The forward and reverse primers for the human primary miR-148a (pri-miR-148a) are listed in Table I. To construct the luciferase reporter plasmids, the 3′-UTR sequences from +2,286 to +2,308 of TGFβ2 and sequence from +8,335 to +8,357 of SMAD2 were inserted at the HindIII/XhoI site downstream of the luciferase gene in the pGL3-promoter vector. All final constructs were verified by DNA sequence analysis.

Table I Primer sequences used for real-time RT-PCR.

Table I

Primer sequences used for real-time RT-PCR.

Gene	Forward/Reverse	Primer (5′-3′)	Tm (°C)	Cycles
hTGFβ2	Forward	TGGTGAAAGCAGAGTTCAGAG	60	40
	Reverse	CACAACTTTGCTGTCGATGTAG
hSMAD2	Forward	AAGCAGTGAAAAGTCTGGTG	60	40
	Reverse	GTTGTATCCCACTGATCTAT
hSMAD4	Forward	TGGGAAGAGATCACCCTGTC	60	40
	Reverse	CCCAACGGTAAAAGACCTCA
hGAPDH	Forward	GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT	60	40
	Reverse	AATGAAGGGGTCATTGATGG
rTGFα	Forward	GTATCCTGGTAGCTGTGTGT	60	40
	Reverse	ATACTGAGTGTGGGAATCTGGG
rTGFβ2	Forward	CATGCCCTTATCTGTGGAGTTC	60	40
	Reverse	TGGGCGTATTGCCAATGT
rSMAD2	Forward	AGCAGTGAAAAGTCTGGTGA	60	40
	Reverse	AGAGCAAGTGCTTGGTATGG
rSMAD3	Forward	CAGAACGTGAACACCAAGT	60	40
	Reverse	CAAGCGGCAGTAGATGAC
rSMAD4	Forward	CGCCTGTCTGAGCA TTGTAC	60	40
	Reverse	CGATTACTTGGTGGATGTTGG
rGAPDH	Forward	TGACTCTACCCACGGCAAGTTCAA	60	40
	Reverse	ACGACATACTCAGCACCAGCATCA
miR-148a		GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGA
RT		GTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACACAAAG
miR-148a	Forward	GTTCCATTATCGGTCGCAT	60	40
	Reverse	TCTACAGTCAGGAGTCCACC
U6	Forward	CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA	60	40
	Reverse	AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
pcDNA3.1-miR-148a	Forward	CCTCGAGGTTCCATTATCGGTCGCAT
	Reverse	CGGGATCCACCAGGGTAAGATGAAGAGA

[i] Restriction enzyme sites appear underlined.

Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR

Gastric tissues and total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using dNTPs (1 mM), 5X reverse transcription buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 250 mM KCl, 50 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM DTT), 16 units RNasin, and 2.5 units of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). SYBR Green (Toyobo; Osaka, Japan) was used for all real-time PCR reactions. All real-time PCR reactions were performed and analyzed with the CFX connect real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA, USA). The primers and PCR conditions for miR-148a, human and rat TGFα, TGFβ2, SMAD2, SMAD3 and SMAD4 are listed in Table I. GAPDH was used to normalize the relative expression levels of TGFα, TGFβ2, SMAD2, SMAD3 and SMAD4. U6 was used to normalize the relative expression levels of miRs. Gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method relative to the internal control.

Transient transfection and luciferase assays

GC cell lines (AGS, YCC3 and SCH) were used for the luciferase assays. Cells were transiently co-transfected with pcDNA-3.1(-) expression vectors or with an empty pGL-3 vector. A dual-luciferase reporter assay system was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). Luciferase activity was quantified 48 h after transfection using a luminometer and the Stop & GloH Dual Luciferase kit (Promega). To control for transfection efficiency, firefly luciferase activity was corrected according to Renilla luciferase activity.

Western blotting

Western blots were used to detect the protein levels in different rat groups. Briefly, the tissues of the control and GC groups were weighed and homogenized with an ultrasound homogenizer and gastric tissues were subsequently lysed in lysis buffer (1 ml of 1% NP-40, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, containing a 2.5% protease inhibitor cocktail P2714 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min on ice. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 15 min. To detect the TGFα, TGFβ2, SMAD2, SMAD3 and SMAD4 proteins, the proteins (30 μg) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The membranes were incubated for 2 h with a monoclonal mouse anti-human TGFα antibody (1:1500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, CA, USA), a polyclonal rabbit anti-human TGFβ2 antibody (1:2000, Millipore; Billerica, MA, USA), or a polyclonal goat anti-human SMAD2 and SMAD4 (1:1500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). All of the blots were incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:6000, Millipore) for 1 h. β-actin was used as an internal control. The blots were then developed using the ECL detection kit (Thermo Scientific) to produce a chemiluminescent signal that was captured on X-ray film.

Immunofluorescence cytochemistry

The GC cell line AGS was washed twice with cold-PBS and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized and blocked with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA for 10 min. The cells were incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-human TGFβ2 antibody (1:100, Millipore) or a polyclonal goat anti-human SMAD2 antibody (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4°C and then incubated with DYLight 549 (1:100, Boster Biological Technology; Wuhan, China) in 1% BSA for 1.5 h at 37°C. After being washed three-times with ice-cold PBS, the cells were incubated with DAPI for 10 min. The images were captured and analyzed using fluorescence microscopy (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion assays

All experiments were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cell proliferation assays were performed using a Cell Titer 96 Aqueous non-radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega) and measured using a Perkin Elmer plate reader (EnVision™ Multilabel Plate Reader). Triplicate assays were performed. Colony formation assay was used to further study the effect of miR-148a on cell proliferation. Three cells were plated in 6-well plates and cultured for 10 days. Colonies were fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 5 min and stained with 1.0% crystal violet for 30 sec.

Cell migration assays were performed using BioCoat™ 24-well chambers with 8-μm pore filter inserts (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). After chamber rehydration, 5×104 cells were transferred to the upper chamber in 500 μl of serum-free medium. Complete medium with 10% FBS was used as a chemoattractant. Cells were incubated for 48 h, and the migrated cells on the lower surface of the insert or in the wells were trypsinized so that cell numbers could be quantified. Each assay was performed in triplicate, and the results were averaged over three independent experiments.

Cell invasion assays were performed similarly using BioCoat Matrigel™ invasion chambers with 8-μm pore polycarbonate membranes that were precoated with Matrigel Matrix (BD Biosciences).

Tumor growth in nude mice

An equal number (1×107) of BGC-823 cells transfected with pcDNA-3.1-miR-148a or pcDNA-3.1 were harvested after 72 h. Three groups (each group with six mice) of four- to six-week-old male Balb/c nude mice were given subcutaneous injections with BGC-823-miR-148a cells or BGC-vector cells. The mice were monitored every three days for tumor formation. The tumor sizes were measured every three days using calipers. The tumor size at 31 days post-injection was used as the endpoint reading. The data are presented as the mean volume mean ± SD. TGFβ2 and SMAD2 proteins in tumors were detected by qPCR.

Flow cytometry assay

BGC-823-miR-148a cells or BGC-vector cells were isolated and made into single cell suspensions, washed with PBS and then fixed in 3 ml cold 70% ethanol for 1 h at −20°C. The cells were then washed three times with BioLegend Cell Staining Buffer and resuspended in 100 μl of PBS. APC-conjugated Ki-67 antibody (10 μl, BioLegend) was added and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. Cells were washed with BioLegend Cell Staining Buffer and then resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS for flow cytometric analysis.

Statistical analyses

The results were expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVAs followed by least significant difference (LSD) post-hoc tests, with a p-value <0.05 being considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

MNNG-induced gastric cancer in rats

To determine the effects of the MNNG-initiated GC rat model, all animals were monitored closely for general health during the study period and their body weights were recorded weekly. The results demonstrated that the body weights of the control animals were higher than that in the MNNG-treated group throughout the study. In the early phase of the study (from the 14th-31st week), the differences in body weights between the control and MNNG-treated groups were significant (Fig. 1). There were a total of five deaths during this study period: none in the control group and five in the MNNG-treated group. The causes of death are listed in Table II. The incidence of MNNG-initiated GC are shown in Table II.

Figure 1 The body weights of animals in the MNNG-treatment and control groups. The body weights in different groups were measured weekly during the whole study period. The results indicate that weights of control group rats were higher than the MNNG-treated groups during the whole study period. n=20 (control), and n=15 (MNNG).

Table II Tumor incidence and the cause of death in the groups of study animals.

Table II

Tumor incidence and the cause of death in the groups of study animals.

Group	Control	MNNG
No. of rats	20	20
No. of death (%)	0 (0)	5 (25)
Cause of death		Gastric cancer (3), small bowel cancer (1), unknown (1)
No. of rats with gastric tumors (%)	0 (0)	18 (90)

MNNG increases TGFβ2, SMAD2, and SMAD4 in rat gastric tissues

The mRNA and protein levels of TGFβ2 were 2.1-fold and 2.1-fold higher in the MNNG-treated group compared with the control group, respectively (Fig. 2B and G). SMAD2 mRNA and protein levels were 1.8- and 2.0-fold higher in the MNNG-treated group compared with the control group, respectively (Fig. 2C and H). SMAD4 mRNA and protein levels were 1.3- and 1.5-fold higher in the MNNG-treated group compared with the control group, respectively (Fig. 2E and J). However, there were no differences in TGFα and SMAD3 in either the mRNA or protein level (Fig. 2A, D, F and I). These data suggested that MNNG could upregulate TGFβ2, SMAD2 and SMAD4, subsequently leading to GC. However, the results demonstrated that TGFα and SMAD3 were not involved in the mechanism of MNNG initiated GC in the rat model.

Figure 2 Changes in TGFα, TGFβ2, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4 in MNNG-treated rats. MNNG induced TGFβ2, SMAD2, and SMAD4 mRNA levels (B, C and E) and protein levels (G, H and J), but did not affect TGFα and SMAD3 mRNA levels (A and E) and protein levels (F and I). The upper part shows mRNA levels in different groups (A–E), and lower part shows protein levels by western blotting. A representative immunoblot is shown. β-actin was used as a loading control (F–J). n=20 (control), and n=15 (MNNG). *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 vs. the control.

miR-148a decreases the expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 in GC cells

To verify whether miR-148a regulated the expression of TGFβ2, SMAD2, and SMAD4, we used a QPCR assay to quantify the level of miR-148a in the GC rat model. The results showed that miR-148a was inhibited significantly in MNNG-treated rats compared with normal rats (reduced 63%) (Fig. 3A). The data suggested that miR-148a might be involved in the occurrence and development of GC via MNNG treatment. Furthermore, we constructed a primary miR-148a expression plasmid and transfected it into GC cells (AGS, YCC3, and SCH) and verified the mRNA levels of TGFβ2, SMAD2, and SMAD4. The results demonstrated that the mRNA levels for both TGFβ2 and SMAD2 were reduced in all three GC cell lines (Fig. 3B and C), but SMAD4 mRNA levels were not affected by miR-148a (Fig. 3D). These data suggested that miR-148a could regulate the mRNA levels of TGFβ2 and SMAD2, but not SMAD4. We used immunofluorescence cytochemistry to demonstrate the effects of miR-148a overexpression in AGS cells. The results confirmed that miR-148a could inhibit the expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 (Fig. 3E). As shown in Fig. 3E, the expression of TGFβ2 (red) was predominantly located in the cytoplasm, and SMAD2 was expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (green). Overexpression of miR-148a inhibited the levels of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 significantly (Fig. 3E, down).

Figure 3 Effects of miR-148a on the expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 in GC cells. The miR-148a levels in different groups were tested. MNNG significantly reduced miR-148a levels in the GC rat model compared with the control group (A). Overexpressing miR-148a inhibited the mRNA levels of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 in GC cells (B and C), but did not affect SMAD4 (D), suggesting that the changes in SMAD4 in MNNG-treated rats were not regulated by miR-148a. Immunofluorescence cytochemistry demonstrates the effects of miR-148a on TGFβ2 (red) and SMAD2 (green) in GC cells (E). **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 vs. the control.

miR-148a binds to TGFβ2- and SMAD2-3′UTRs in GC cells

To verify the regulation mechanism of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 by miR-148a, we analyzed the 3′-UTR sequences of the TGFβ2 and SMAD2 genes and performed luciferase assays to confirm whether miR-148a could bind to the TGFβ2 and SMAD2 genes. The luciferase activities in AGS, YCC3, and SCH cells transfected with the TGFβ2- and SMAD2-3′-UTR reporter plasmids were inhibited following co-transfection with a miR-148a plasmid (Fig. 4A). These data suggested that the binding sites of miR-148a in both the TGFβ2- and SMAD2-3′UTRs were functional.

Figure 4 miR-148a expression modulates multiple pro-oncogenic traits in GC cells. The co-transfection of miR-148a decreased the luciferase activity in cells transfected with 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTRs) of the TGFβ2 and SMAD2 genes located at +2,286 to +2,308, and +8,335 to +8,357, respectively (A). The predicted target sequences of miR-148a located on the 3′-UTRs of human TGFβ2 and SMAD2 genes (upper) (A). Representative micrographs (left) and quantification (right) of crystal violet-stained cell colonies (B). miR-148a expression suppresses cellular proliferation in GC cell lines (C). miR-148a-transfected cell lines were assessed for cell proliferation at 24, 48 and 72 h post-transfection. Triplicate experiments were conducted for each set. (D and E) miR-148a reduces motility and invasiveness of GC cells. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. the control.

miR-148a reduces the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells

To investigate the functional significance of miR-148a downregulation in GC cells, we selected three GC cell lines (AGS, YCC3, and SCH). The miR-148a primary plasmid was constructed and transfected into these cell lines, and the miR-148a expression levels in these cells were confirmed by qRT-PCR (data not shown). To investigate the biological effect of miR-148a inhibition on gastric cancer progression, the AGS, YCC3, and SCH gastric cancer cell lines were transfected with miR-148a. Colony formation assay showed that miR-148a decreased the rate of cell proliferation significantly (Fig. 4B).

Then, we compared the cell proliferation rates of the control- and miR-148a-transfected cells at various time points. In all three cell lines, the growth of miR-148a-transfected cells was reduced significantly compared to cells transfected with negative-control miRs (Fig. 4C). These results suggested that miR-148a overexpression was sufficient to inhibit cellular proliferation in GC cells. To assess the effects of miR-148a on GC migration and invasion, we tested the three cell lines that stably expressed miR-148a or empty vectors. All cell expressing vector controls migrated robustly in the Transwell assays (Fig. 4D), whereas those overexpressing miR-148a exhibited a significant reduction in migration capacity in GC cells (reduced approximately 46, 32 and 33%, respectively). Similarly, in the invasion assays, overexpression of miR-148a exhibited inhibition of the invasion capacity compared with controls in three GC cell lines (the inhibition rates were 63% in AGS, 64% in YCC3, and 53% in SCH cells) (Fig. 4E). Taken collectively, these results indicated that miR-148a over-expression was sufficient to suppress several pro-oncogenic traits in vitro, consistent with miR-148a playing a tumor-suppressive role in GC cells.

miR-148a inhibits GC development by inhibiting TGFβ2 and SMAD2

To further investigate the function of miR-148a in a mouse GC model, BALB/c nude mice were given subcutaneous injections withBGC-823-miR-148a cells or BGC-vector cells. The tumor volumes were calculated every three days. The results demonstrated that miR-148a could decrease BCG-823 growth in vivo (Fig. 5A). The Ki-67 protein is a cellular marker for proliferation. In this study, flow cytometry results indicated that the percentage of Ki-67 in BGC-823-miR-148a tumor tissues was lower than that in BGC-823-vector (Fig. 5B and C). In the gastric tumor tissues, TGFβ2 and SMAD2 expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR. In BGC-miR-148a, TGFβ2 and SMAD2 expression levels were much lower than in BCG-vector cells (Fig. 5D). These results suggested that miR-148a could efficiently reduce gastric cancer proliferation and Ki-67 expression was reduced in BGC-823-miR-148a cells (Fig. 5A–C). miR-148a also inhibited the expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 (Fig. 5D). These results suggested that miR-148a inhibited GC development by inhibiting TGFβ2 and SMAD2.

Figure 5 miR-148a inhibited GC cells in vivo. Volumes of BGC-823 tumors in vivo were detected every three days with or without miR-148a transfection (n=6, two of each group are representative tumors of six) (A). Cell proliferation of BGC-823-miR-148a/BGC-823-vector in tumor tissue was determined with APC-Ki67 mAb using flow cytometry (B). Percentage of Ki67 in GC tissue from GC mouse model (n=6) (C). Expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 in GC cells with BGC-823-miR-148a/BGC-823-vector from tumor tissue (D).

Discussion

In this study, we determined the changes in miR-148a, TGFα, TGFβ2, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4 levels in MNNG-initiated gastric carcinoma in Wistar rats, and examined the role of miR-148a in inhibiting the expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 in GC cell lines. We found that miR-148a could inhibit cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion in GC cells. MNNG-induced GC is a well-established animal model for gastric carcinogenesis (26,27). GC is one of the most devastating cancers in humans and causes a particularly high mortality worldwide (28). Achieving a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with GC carcinogenesis might identify new diagnostic and treatment strategies for this disease. Numerous genes have been established to be involved in this disease, including tumor-suppressor genes and oncogenes (p53, β-catenin), gene amplifications and deletions (c-Meta, ERBB2), and anti-inflammatory factors (TGFα, TGFβ2) (29,30), but the function of miRs in this disease remains unclear.

We found that, compared with the control group, the mRNA and protein levels of TGFβ2, SMAD2, and SMAD4 were increased significantly in MNNG-initiated GC rats, but miR-148a levels were reduced. However, the TGFα and SMAD3 expression levels were not influenced by MNNG. Previously, studies have shown that SMAD2 is the primary intracellular signaling pathway downstream of TGF-β (29). TGF-β can act as an oncogenic factor, and it is involved in proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis (31). In glioma patients, high TGFβ-SMAD activity was present in aggressive, highly proliferative gliomas, and it conferred poor prognosis (32). Another research group reported that activation of SMAD2 could induce the migration of mouse squamous carcinoma cells (33). Overexpression of SMAD2 was also suggested to be associated with metastasis and was correlated with poor prognosis of GCs, especially diffuse-type gastric carcinomas (34). In our study, TGFβ2 and SMAD2 expression levels were both elevated in MNNG-treated rats, suggesting that TGFβ2 and SMAD2 were promising target genes that were related to metastasis in GC cells.

Recently, evidence has convincingly shown that miRs play an important role in many human cancers (8,14). A previous miR profiling study that used tumor and normal GC tissues found that approximately 80 miRs exhibited expression imbalance. Among them, the tumor-suppressor miR-148a was one of the most significantly downregulated miRNAs in GC cell lines and GC tissues from GC patients compared with the adjacent normal gastric tissues (35). However, the downstream targets of this miRNA are still unclear. We identified the role of miR-148a in regulating the expression of TGFβ2, SMAD2, and SMAD4. The results indicated that overexpression of miR-148a could reduce the mRNA levels of TGFβ2 and SMAD2 significantly, but not SMAD4. These results were consistent with the immunofluorescence cytochemistry data. Furthermore, we assayed luciferase activity using human GC cells and found that overexpression of miR-148a could inhibit the activities of the TGFβ2- and SMAD2-3′UTRs. These data suggested that the binding sites of miR-148a were functional. In this study, we demonstrated the effects of miR-148a on proliferation, migration, and invasion in GC cells. The growth of miR-148a-transfected cells was reduced significantly compared with cells that were transfected with negative-control miRs. Simultaneously, the miR-148a-transfected cells exhibited the capacity for migration and invasion compared with the controls in three GC cell lines. In vivo, miR-148a also displayed an inhibited function to GC, which suggested that miR-148a inhibited GC development via inhibiting TGFβ2 and SMAD2.

In conclusion, to our knowledge, our study is the first to functionally explore the role of miR-148a in GC development and progression. Our data suggests that miR-148a may act as a novel tumor-suppressor miR in GC. In addition to providing the probable mechanism involved in the regulation of the expression of TGFβ2 and SMAD2, our findings may also have translational relevance as miRNAs have also been proposed to be potential therapeutic candidates. By understanding the mechanism and function of miR-148a as a tumor suppressor, it may eventually be possible to develop miR-148a as a therapeutic agent in GC treatment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81230031/H18), the National Science Foundation of China (61272274), and the Hubei Province's Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Program.

Abbreviations:

References