Open Access

Unfavorable effect of calcitriol and its low-calcemic analogs on metastasis of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer

  • Authors:
    • Artur Anisiewicz
    • Agata Pawlik
    • Beata Filip-Psurska
    • Eliza Turlej
    • Stanisław Dzimira
    • Magdalena Milczarek
    • Katarzyna Gdesz
    • Diana Papiernik
    • Joanna Jarosz
    • Dagmara Kłopotowska
    • Andrzej Kutner
    • Andrzej Mazur
    • Joanna Wietrzyk
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 2, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4185
  • Pages:103-126
  • Copyright: © Anisiewicz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: HTML 0 views | PDF 0 views     Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations

Abstract

Low vitamin D status is considered as a risk factor for breast cancer and has prognostic significance. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency increases after adjuvant cancer therapy, which alters bone metabolism increasing the risk of osteoporosis. It is now postulated that vitamin D supplementation in breast cancer treatment delays the recurrence of cancer thereby extending survival. We evaluated the impact of calcitriol and its low-calcemic analogs, PRI‑2191 and PRI‑2205, on the tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer. Gene expression analysis related to cancer invasion/metastasis, real‑time PCR, ELISA, western blotting, and histochemical studies were performed. In vitro studies were conducted to compare the effects of calcitriol and its analogs on 4T1 and 67NR cell proliferation and expression of selected proteins. Calcitriol and its analogs increased lung metastasis without influencing the growth of primary tumor. The levels of plasma 17β-estradiol and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) were found to be elevated after treatment. Moreover, the results showed that tumor blood perfusion improved and osteopontin (OPN) levels increased, whereas vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and TGFβ levels decreased in tumors from treated mice. All the studied treatments resulted in increased collagen content in the tumor tissue in the early step of tumor progression, and calcitriol caused an increase in collagen content in lung tissue. In addition, in vitro proliferation of 4T1 tumor cells was not found to be affected by calcitriol or its analogs in contrast to non-metastatic 67NR cells. Calcitriol and its analogs enhanced the metastatic potential of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer by inducing the secretion of OPN probably via host cells. In addition, OPN tumor overexpression prevailed over the decreasing tumor TGFβ level and blood vessel normalization via tumor VEGF deprivation induced by calcitriol and its analogs. Moreover, the increased plasma TGFβ and 17β-estradiol levels contributed to the facilitation of metastatic process.

Introduction

Approximately 70% of the breast cancers are estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and are responsive to endocrine therapy (1). The hormonal drugs used to treat ER+ breast cancers have been designed to antagonize the mitogenic effects of estrogens, which include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen and raloxifene that bind to the ER and act as antagonists in the breast; selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) such as fulvestrant that bind to and target ER for degradation; and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) that inhibit the activity of aromatase, an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of estrogens from androgenic precursors (2). Currently, AIs are the first-line therapy used to prevent breast cancer progression in postmenopausal women following primary therapy (2,3). Breast cancer therapies that reduce estrogen levels (e.g., oophorectomy, chemotherapy, and AIs) increase bone resorption without a corresponding increase in bone formation (4,5). The loss of bone mineral density in cancer-associated bone diseases result from the direct or systemic effects of the tumor in addition to the therapies used to treat the primary disease. It may be related to the local effects of metastatic deposits in bone and/or to the generalized bone loss from tumor-produced, systemically circulating, bone-resorbing hormones or cytokines. These comprise parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) or tumor stimulated secretion by the osteoblast of local bone resorbing factors such as receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), interleukin (IL)-6, or IL-3. In some tumors, more than one mechanism may be involved (6). To overcome the problems with failed calcium homeostasis, several issues have been proposed. One of them is the addition of bisphosphonates to mammary gland cancer treatment protocols (7,8). Another is the use of vitamin D during treatment. Many researchers during preclinical studies and clinical observations hypothesized that the addition of vitamin D or its analogs in the breast cancer treatment based on SERMs or AIs improves the efficacy of chemotherapy, among others alleviating patients from the musculoskeletal and joint pain (911).

Low vitamin D status, measured in terms of the biomarker 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D3), is often considered as the risk factor for breast cancer and has prognostic significance as it is involved in the development of cancer and in interactions with breast cancer treatments (12). The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and breast cancer is rather common and correlated with all clinical parameters such as incidence of tumor, tumor biology, prognosis, and antineoplastic treatment tolerance (13). Vitamin D deficiency increases after adjuvant cancer therapy, which alters bone metabolism in patients with breast cancer thereby increasing the risk of osteoporosis (14,15). Moreover, some studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in women with ER-negative, progesterone receptor-negative (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers. It is postulated that correction of vitamin D deficiency in these women represents a reasonable but as yet, untested, strategy to delay recurrence and extend survival (16,17).

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is present in almost all tissues and cells in the human body. Calcitriol, a hormonally active form of vitamin D3 (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3; 1,25(OH)2D3), is primarily known for its role in bone mineralization and calcium homeostasis. In addition, several studies have revealed that calcitriol is important in immunomodulation, regulation of inflammation and cytokines, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis (reviewed in refs. 12,13,18). However, calcemic activity and subsequent risk of hypercalcemia caused by calcitriol treatment has limited its usage in anticancer therapy; therefore, currently, many researchers are focusing on the synthesis of new analogs with balanced calcemic effect and antiproliferative activities. Vitamin D3 metabolite used in this study, (24R)-1,24-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (tacalcitol; 1,24(OH)2D3; PRI-2191), is physiologically formed via microsomal C-24 hydroxylation process. This process is alternative to C-25 hydroxylation, which leads to the formation of calcitriol. Both calcitriol and tacalcitol are hydroxylated to the less active metabolite 1,24,25(OH)3D3. Tacalcitol inhibits proliferation and induces differentiation of epidermal mouse and human keratinocytes. It also binds to the VDR with the affinity higher or similar to that of calcitriol but shows weaker induction of hypercalcemia than calcitriol (1921). However, the geometric analogs of vitamin D with the reversed (5E,7E) geometry of the triene system were reported by our (2224) and other laboratories (25) to show the enhanced biological activity when compared to the natural (5Z,7E) vitamin D. We demonstrated a higher antiproliferative activity of synthetic tacalcitol, PRI-2191, when compared to calcitriol against various cancer cell lines, and we showed that this effect is attributed to the induction of cancer cell differentiation. We also showed the in vitro and in vivo improvement of the activity of a range of anticancer drugs against human and murine cancer cells with concomitant use of vitamin D (2023,2631).

For the vast majority of cancer-related deaths, drug resistance and irremovable metastatic lesions are responsible. Metastasis results from the numerous interactions between cancer cells, hematopoietic stem cells, and normal cells within the microenvironment of the primary tumor and metastasis target organ. These interactions are in turn influenced by multiple endocrine, paracrine, and physical factors (32). Bone-targeted treatments may modify the course of the disease via both direct and indirect effects on this 'vicious cycle' of growth factor and cytokine signaling between tumor and normal cells (5,8).

Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of calcitriol and its low-calcemic analogs on the mammary gland tumor growth and metastasis. To this purpose, we used 4T1 mouse metastatic mammary gland cancer cells because the in vitro proliferation of these cells is not affected by calcitriol or its analogs. We hypothesized that the enhancement of metastatic process by calcitriol and its analogs is related to the impact on tumor microenvironment including tumor vasculature.

Materials and methods

Compounds

Calcitriol (1,25(OH)2D3) and its analogs, namely, PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 are certified synthetic materials obtained from the Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland. Samples of the compounds were stored in amber ampoules under argon at −20°C. Prior to usage, in case of in vitro studies, compounds were dissolved in 99.8% ethanol to a concentration of 10−4 M and subsequently diluted in culture medium to reach appropriate concentration. For animal experiments, compounds were dissolved in 99.8% ethanol and then diluted in 80% propylene glycol (PEG) to reach the required concentrations. All compounds were freshly prepared each day prior to administration. The preparation and storage of the tested compounds was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (the Pharmaceutical Research Institute) and literature data (23,33). Tested compounds were administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to mice in a volume of 5 µl/g body weight (Fig. 1).

Cells and cell line culture

The mouse mammary adenocarcinoma 4T1 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and the 67NR (non-metastatic counterparts of 4T1) cells were received from Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA. The cells were used in experiments immediately after obtaining.

The 4T1 cell line was maintained in a mixture of RPMI-1640 and Opti-MEM medium (1:1, Gibco, Scotland, UK) adjusted to contain 3.5 g/l glucose, 2 mM L-glutamine and 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) with 5% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, GE Healthcare, UK). The 67NR cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco) with 10% calf bovine serum (CBS; ATCC), 1% amino acid, and 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH). Both culture media were supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin (Polfa Tarchomin S.A., Warsaw, Poland) and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH). The cells were grown at 37°C in a humid atmosphere saturated with 5% CO2.

Mice

BALB/c female, 6–8-week old mice, weighing 20–25 g, obtained from the Center of Experimental Medicine of the Medical University of Bialystok (Bialystok, Poland), were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions.

All experiments were performed according to EU Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and were approved by the first Local Committee for Experiments with the Use of Laboratory Animals, Wroclaw, Poland (no of permission: 40/2014).

Design of the in vivo experiments

BALB/c female mice were orthotopically inoculated into the right mammary fat pad with 1×104 viable 4T1 tumor cells per mouse in 0.05 ml Hanks solution and then randomly divided into groups receiving appropriate treatment. Vitamin D analogs were administered subcutaneously (s.c.) thrice a week starting from day 7 after tumor cell inoculation. The single dose of compounds was as follows: calcitriol, 0.5 µg/kg; PRI-2191, 1.0 µg/kg; and PRI-2205, 10.0 µg/kg.

Blood was harvested on the days 0 (before tumor inoculation), 7 (before treatment), 14 (micro-metastases observed (34), 21, 28, and 33 after the inoculation of 4T1 cells (day of tumor inoculation assigned as day 0). The mice were anesthetized with 3–5% (v/v) mixture of isoflurane (Aerrane isofluranum; Baxter, Canada) in synthetic air (200 ml/min) prior to sacrificing the animals. The tumors, lungs, and thoracic aortas were harvested for further analyzes (Fig. 1). Following additional controls were also used: healthy mice (assigned as day 0) and mice with implanted tumors euthanized on the day when the vitamin D derivatives began to be administered (day 7). The control group from day 7 was included to monitor the condition of the body at the start of the treatment. Some of analyses were performed on two different days: 14 or 21 (as an early stage of tumor progression) and 28 or 33 (as a late stage of tumor progression).

Evaluation of the therapeutic effect

Tumor volume was calculated using the formula (a2×b)/2, where a = shorter tumor diameter in mm and b = longer tumor diameter in mm. Tumors were measured thrice a week. Mice were sacrificed when the tumor volume exceeded 2,000 mm3. Multiple tumors were not observed in our study. Metastases were counted in the lungs fixed in 4% buffered formalin by two independent examiners and mean value of those counts from two independent experiments is presented.

Body weight change (BWC)

The average BWC in all groups was calculated based on the following formula: BWC = (ABWn/ABW1) × 100 – 100%, where ABWn is the average body weight on the nth day of the experiment (during treatment) and ABW1 is the average body weight on the first day of treatment. The body weight of experimental animals was measured thrice per week throughout the study. We considered the treatment to be toxic if the BWC was found to be decreased by ~20% in two successive measurements. However, the experiments were terminated when body weight loss did not reach 20% in any of the mice.

Calcemic activity

Calcium level was measured in each individual plasma sample using the Cobas c 111 z ISE (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland) device.

Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis

The influence of calcitriol and its analogs on tumor angiogenesis was evaluated by means of ultrasound imaging of tumor perfusion.

For the ultrasound imaging MicroMarker™ Contrast Agent (VisualSonics, Ontario, Canada) was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. Animals were anesthetized with a 2–3% (v/v) mixture of isoflurane (Aerrane isofluranum; Baxter) in synthetic air (200 ml/min) and placed on the animal handling station equipped with an individual mask providing 1.5–2% (v/v) mixture of isoflurane and synthetic air. The position of the handling station was adjusted so that the central section of the tumor was being visualized and contrast agent was injected into the tail vein of the animal. Signal of the contrast marker accumulating in the tumor tissue was recorded using the probe of 13–24 MHz frequency (MS250, VisualSonics). Next, the peak-enhancement [contrast mean power as l.a.u. (linear arbitrary units)] and time-to-peak (sec) parameters were calculated using the Vevo LAB 1.7.1 Software (Visualsonics).

Immunohistochemical staining of aorta sections

For the double immunohistochemistry sequential staining of thoracic aorta (isolated from mice on the days 7, 14, 21, 28 or 33 and from healthy, non-treated animals) sections were fixed in buffered formalin and then cut into 4-µm thick slices that were subsequently dewaxed and rehydrated through gradient of Unyhol and Unyhol Plus (Bio-Optica, Mediolan, Italy). Antigen retrieval was performed by heating in Tris-EDTA, pH 9.0 (Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy PAN, Wrocław, Poland) at 96°C for 45 min. Endogenous peroxidase and phosphatase activity was quenched by incubating with Dako Dual Endogenous systems (Dako Cytomation Poland, Gdynia, Poland) for 10 min. Subsequently, sections of aorta were incubated with primary antibodies described in Table I.

Table I

Antibodies and detection systems used for aorta immunohistochemistry.

Table I

Antibodies and detection systems used for aorta immunohistochemistry.

Antibody (source)AntigenAntibody dilution/duration of incubation
Rabbit polyclonal (Abcam, Cambridge, UK)CD31 (PECAM)1:50/1 h
CD105 (endoglin)1:1,000/1 h
vWF1:100/1 h
αSMA1:100/1 h

Antigen-antibody binding was detected using Dako Real EnVision Detection Systems Peroxidase or by Dako Real Detection Alkaline Phosphatase both from Dako Cytomation Poland, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Counterstaining was performed using Gill's III hematoxylin (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and the specimen was secured with a coverslip using Dako Faramount Aqueous Mounting Medium (Dako Cytomation Poland).

Microscopic examination and photographs were captured using a bright field microscope (Olympus CX41) connected with a camera equipped with Olympus Stream Image Analysis Software (Olympus Europe Holding GmBH, Hamburg, Germany). Blinded microscopic examination was performed at magnifications (×10 and ×100) and described according to the below scheme: 0, no staining; 1+, delicate staining; 2+, average color staining; 3+, intense color staining; 4+, bright color staining.

Masson's trichrome staining for collagen fibers of tumor and lung tissue

Tissues that were dewaxed and rehydrated in a descending alcohol series were incubated with Weigert's iron hematoxylin nuclear staining solution for 5 min (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). After 5 min of flushing in tap water, slides were submerged in 1% acetic acid for 3 min. Subsequently, the sections were immersed respectively in Azoploxine solution for cytoplasm dyeing (5 min), Tungstophosphoric acid orange G solution for erythrocytes staining (1 min), and Light green SF solution for collagen and connective tissue visualization (5 min). The slides were washed in 1% acetic acid between each staining procedure for 3 min (Masson-Goldner staining kit, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). In the last step, slides were washed in 1% acetic acid for an additional 5 min and left to dry. Afterwards histological slides were covered with non-aqueous mounting agent (Neo-Mount anhydrous mounting medium; Merck KGaA, Germany) and a cover glass for further analysis.

Microscopic examination and photographs were made using a bright field microscope (Olympus CX41) connected with camera equipped with Olympus Stream Image Analysis Software (Olympus Europe Holding GmBH). Blinded microscopic examination was performed at 2 magnifications (×10 and ×40) and described according to the scoring described in Table II and figure legends.

Table II

Scoring of staining for collagen in lung tissue.

Table II

Scoring of staining for collagen in lung tissue.

Day after tumor transplantationScore for collagen staining
ControlCalcitriolPRI-2191PRI-2205
Day 0+++
Day 7+++
Day 14++++++++/++
Day 21+++/++++++
Day 28+++++/+++++/++++

[i] Semiquantitative evaluation of collagen fibers were based on its presence of a small level (+), the medium (++), significant (+++) and very abundant (++++).

Mouse tumor invasion/metastasis PCR array

Total RNA of tumor tissue was extracted using TRIzol (TRI reagent; Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA quantity and purity were determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the quality of RNA was verified by agarose electrophoresis. Reverse transcription was performed using iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Real-time quantitative PCR of total cDNA was executed by ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with SYBR green chemistry (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Mouse Tumor Invasion/Metastasis PCR Array Library (MTIM-1) was purchased from Real-Time Primers (Elkins Park, PA, USA). The array contained 88 primers for genes associated with the invasion or metastasis process and eight control genes. All genes available within this PCR array are listed in Table III. All PCR amplification cycles were performed at 95°C for 10 sec and 58°C for 45 sec (50 cycles). We used 25 ng of cDNA (pooled from 4–5 mice within group) for a single reaction, and each test was performed in duplicate. Fold-change (RQ) of target cDNA was determined by calculating the differences in ΔΔCT values in reference to phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (Pgk1) by DataAssist 3.01 software (freeware by Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA).

Table III

List of genes evaluated using mouse tumor invasion/metastasis PCR array library (MTIM-1).

Table III

List of genes evaluated using mouse tumor invasion/metastasis PCR array library (MTIM-1).

SymbolName
Adamts1ADAM metallopeptidase
Aldh3a1Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member A1
Angpt1Angiopoietin 1
Angptl4Angiopoietin-like 4
Casp8Caspase 8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase
Ccne2Cyclin E2
Ccr7Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 7
Cd44CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)
Cd82CD82 antigen
Cdh1Cadherin 1, type 1, E-cadherin (epithelial)
Cdh11Cadherin 11, type 2, OB-cadherin (osteoblast)
Cdh2Cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin
Cdh6Cadherin 6
Cldn7Claudin 7
Col1a1Collagen, type I, α1
Col4a2Collagen, type IV, α2
Col6a1Collagen, type VI, α1
Csf1Colony stimulating factor 1
Csf2Colony stimulating factor 2
Csf3Colony stimulating factor 3
Cst7Cystatin F (leukocystatin)
CtgfConnective tissue growth factor
CtsbCathepsin B
CtsdCathepsin D
CtskCathepsin K
Ctsl1Cathepsin L-like 3
Cxcl1Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1
Cxcl13Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13
Cxcr4Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4
Cxcr6Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 6
Drg1Developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1
EregEpiregulin
Fgf8Fibroblast growth factor 8 (androgen-induced)
Flt1Fms-related tyrosine kinase
Flt4Fms-related tyrosine kinase 4
GpiGlucose phosphate isomerase
GsnGelsolin (amyloidosis, Finnish type)
HgfHepatocyte growth factor (hepapoietin A; scatter factor)
Hif1aHypoxia inducible factor 1, α subunit
Hmgb1High-mobility group box 1
Id1Inhibitor of DNA binding 1
Il13ra2Interleukin 13 receptor, α2
Isg20Interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 kDa
Jag1Jagged 1 (Alagille syndrome)
Kiss1KiSS-1 metastasis-suppressor
Klrc2Killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C, member 2
KynuKynureninase (L-kynurenine hydrolase)
Ltbp1Latent transforming growth factor β binding protein 1
Map2k4Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4
Map2k5Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 5
Map2k7Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 7
McamMelanoma cell adhesion molecule
MetMet proto-oncogene (hepatocyte growth factor receptor)
Metap2Methionyl aminopeptidase 2
Mmp1Matrix metallopeptidase 1 (interstitial collagenase)
Mmp10Matrix metallopeptidase 10 (stromelysin 2)
Mmp11Matrix metallopeptidase 11 (stromelysin 3)
Mmp13Matrix metallopeptidase 13 (collagenase 3)
Mmp14Matrix metallopeptidase 14 (membrane-inserted)
Mmp2Matrix metallopeptidase 2
Mmp7Matrix metallopeptidase 7 (matrilysin, uterine)
MycV-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog
Nedd9Neural precursor cell expressed, dev. downregulated 9
Nf2Neurofibromin 2 (merlin)
Nme1Non-metastatic cells 1, protein (NM23A)
Nme2Non-metastatic cells 2, protein
Nme4Non-metastatic cells 4, protein
Pax5Paired box 5
PdgfaPlatelet-derived growth factor α polypeptide
PlaurPlasminogen activator, urokinase receptor
Ptgs2 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2
Runx1Runt-related transcription factor 1
Serpine1Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E
Serpinb5Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B5
Sox4SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 4
SparcSecreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin)
Spp1Secreted phosphoprotein 1
SrcV-src sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (avian)
Tff1Trefoil factor 1
Tgfb1Transforming growth factor, β1
Timp1TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1
Timp2TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 2
Timp3TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3
Timp4TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 4
TncTenascin C (hexabrachion)
Tp53Tumor protein p53
VegfaVascular endothelial growth factor A
VegfbVascular endothelial growth factor B
ActbActin, β
B2m β-2-microglobulin
Gapd Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
GusbGlucuronidase, β
Hprt1Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1
PgkPhosphoglycerate kinase 1
PpiaPeptidylprolyl isomerase A
Rpl13aRibosomal protein L13a
Real-time PCR

Isolation of RNA and synthesis of cDNA was performed as described above. All PCR amplification cycles were performed at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min (40 cycles) using primers specific for following genes: Drg1 (Mm00492246_m1), Nf2 (Mm00477771_m1), Nedd9 (Mm01324843_m1), Mmp13 (Mm00439491_m1), Mmp14 (Mm00485054_m1), Spp1 (Mm00436767_m1), Flt1 (Mm00438980_m1), Plaur (Mm01149438_m1), Tgfb1 (Mm01178820_m1), pgk1 (Mm00435617_m1) with TaqMan chemistry (all from Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). We used 25 ng of cDNA for a single reaction, and each sample was performed in triplicate in a single experiment (3 experiments were performed). Fold-change (RQ) of target cDNA was determined by calculating the differences in ΔΔCT values in reference to phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (Pgk1) by DataAssist 3.01 software (freeware by Applied Biosystems).

Western blotting
Tissue preparation

Tumor tissue specimens were collected in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. To determine the protein expression via western blotting, frozen tumors were mechanically homogenized (Rotilabo, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH) supplemented with a complete mixture of phosphatase and protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH) and kept on ice for 25 min. Lysates were purified via microcentrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C.

Preparation of cells from in vitro culture

Cultured 4T1 or 67NR cells were seeded at a density of 3×105 cells/4 ml in suitable culture medium on a tissue culture dish. After 2 h of attachment, cells were exposed to calcitriol or its analogs at a concentration of 100 nM for 72 h. Next, cultures were rinsed with RIPA buffer and a mixture of phosphatase and protease inhibitors. Cells were scraped using cell scrapers and lysates were collected. Cell lysates were incubated on ice for 25 min and then were microcentrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C.

Protein concentration was determined using a protein assay (DC Protein assay; Bio-Rad Laboratories). Equal amounts of protein (50 µg of cell culture lysates, 100 µg of tumor lysates) were mixed with 4X Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Then, the samples were separated in a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (0.45 µm; Merck Millipore, USA). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% non-fat dry milk in 0.1% PBS/Tween-20 (PBST). Next, the membranes were washed (3×10 min) with 0.1% PBST and then incubated overnight at 4°C with a primary antibody: rabbit anti-VDR, anti-ERα, anti-ERβ, anti-NFκB, anti-IκBα, anti-SNAI, anti-PTEN, anti-CYP24A1, anti-CYP27B1, anti-RXRα, anti-β-catenin polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), or rabbit anti-E-cadherin and anti-N-cadherin polyclonal antibody (ProteinTech, Manchester, UK). After incubation, membranes were washed (3×10 min) with 0.1% PBST and incubated for 1 h with the secondary mouse anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG)-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.). The membranes were finally washed thrice with 0.1% PBST and detected by ECL method. Next, to determine the expression of β-actin, the same membranes (for each tested protein) were incubated with mouse anti-β-actin-HRP monoclonal antibody for 1 h at room temperature, washed (3×10 min 0.1% PBST), and detected by ECL system. Chemiluminescence was visualized using Image station 4000 (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). Densitometry analysis of the western blots was performed using Carestream MI Software 5.0.6.20 (Carestream Health). All blots were normalized to that of β-actin, and the fold-change protein level expression is reported in comparison to that of the β-actin.

ELISA

For the quantitative determination of 17-β-estradiol, osteopontin (OPN), TGFβ, VEGF, thrombospondin, and 25-OH vitamin D, ELISA kits were used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Demeditec Diagnostics GmbH, Germany; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA; eBioscience, Vienna, Austria; Thermo Fisher Scientific; Bioassay Technology Laboratory, Shanghai, China; Eagle Biosciences, Nashua, NH, USA, respectively).

Mouse cytokine and protein expression was detected in mouse plasma, tumor homogenates, and in vitro from 4T1/67NR cells culture supernatants. Tumor lysates were prepared as described above (in western blotting methodology).

For in vitro analysis, 4T1 or 67NR cells were seeded in a tissue culture dish at a density of 3×105 cells/4 ml or in a 6-well plate at a density 3×105 cells/2 ml. Next, after 2 h, the attached cells were exposed to the calcitriol, PRI-2191, or PRI-2205 at a concentration of 100 nM for 6, 24, 48 and 72 h. Next, the supernatants were collected and frozen at −20°C until use.

In vitro antiproliferative assay

Antiproliferative tests were performed as previously described (22). Briefly, 24 h prior to the addition of the tested compounds, 4T1 and 67NR cells were plated in 96-well plates (Sarstedt, Germany) at a density of 1.5×104/ml. To determine the in vitro cytotoxicity of test compounds, the assays were performed after 72-h exposure of the cultured cells to the varying concentrations of tested compounds (total plate incubation time: 96 h) using sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Both cell lines were exposed to each tested vitamin D compound at four different concentrations in the range of 1,000-1 nM. The activity of tested agents was compared to the activity of cisplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (all Accord Healthcare Poland, Warsaw, Poland), camptothecin, and tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH). In addition, control wells loaded with either ethanol or DMSO based on the solubility of the tested agents were maintained. Absorbance of each solution was read using Synergy H4 (BioTek Instruments USA) at a wavelength of 540 nm. Entire washing procedure was performed on Biotek EL-406 washing station. The results were calculated as IC50 value (inhibitory concentration 50%) - the dose (nM or µg/ml) of tested agent which inhibits proliferation of 50% of the cancer cell population. IC50 values were calculated in Prolab-3 system based on Cheburator 0.4, Dmitry Nevozhay software for each experiment (35). Each compound in each concentration was tested in triplicate in a single experiment, which was repeated at least thrice.

Statistical evaluation

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 10 (StatSoft Inc., USA) or GraphPad Prism 7.01 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). The assumptions of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were checked using Shapiro-Wilk's normality test and Bartlett's test. Specific tests used for data analysis are indicated in figure legends. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The animal experiments were planned to investigate the effect of calcitriol and its analogs on the growth and metastasis of mammary gland cancer at various stages of its progression. Besides control healthy mice used for comparisons in selected experiments (assigned as day 0), mice were euthanized on day 7 after tumor cells transplantation to monitor the condition of the body at the start of treatment. To analyze the treatment results during tumor progression, we selected the following time-points of observation: day 14 after cells inoculation (7th day of treatment) as the day, when according to the literature data first micro-metastases can be observed in 4T1 tumor model (34). Next observation points were every week until the first signs of health problems: days 21, 28 and 33. The last observation time was shortened because of the observed body weight loss described below.

Calcitriol and its analogs stimulated metastatic spread of 4T1 mammary gland cancer

In two independent experiments, neither calcitriol nor its analogs (PRI-2191 and PRI-2205) influenced primary 4T1 tumor growth significantly (Fig. 2A). However, in both experiments, the stimulation of lung metastases resulting from the treatment was observed (Fig. 2B). Metastatic foci in lungs were first macroscopically visible on day 21 after inoculation of the tumor cells. On this day, the number of metastases in mice treated with PRI-2205 (P<0.05) was almost twice as high as in control animals. On day 28, the influence of calcitriol on metastasis formation was not observed; however, PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 significantly enhanced the formation of metastases in 127% (P<0.05) and 54%, respectively, as compared to the control mice. On day 33, the tendency to stimulate the formation of lung metastasis was observed in mice treated with calcitriol, PRI-2191, and PRI-2205 (50, 54 and 58% over control, respectively; not significant because of high differences between mice). Histological examination of lung tissue from one of the two conducted experiments showed single metastatic foci on day 14 (in 2 out of 6 in the control group, 0 out of 6 in calcitriol treated, 3 out of 6 in PRI-2191, and 2 out of 6 in PRI-2205 treated mice). On day 33, statistically significant increase of the number of metastatic foci in mice treated with all compounds was observed (Fig. 2C and D).

BWC and blood calcium level were measured throughout the experiment to estimate the toxicity of the treatments used (Fig. 3). The body weight of mice remained unchanged significantly till day 22 in all experimental groups. The kinetics of BWC in control and mice treated with PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 was similar till the end of the experiment. However, from day 24 until the last day of measurements, toxicity of calcitriol was observed in terms of BWC, which decreased in ~10% of the control mice (Fig. 3A).

From day 28, an increase in calcium level was observed in both control (as a result of tumor progression) and treated mice. On day 33, serum calcium level was found to be significantly higher in control tumor-bearing mice than in healthy mice (day 0; Fig. 3C). Calcitriol and PRI-2191 significantly increased calcium level on days 14 and 28 when compared to relevant control tumor-bearing mice (P<0.05). The elevation of calcium level was also significant in mice treated with these compounds on days 28 and 33 when compared to healthy animals. In parallel, measurements of 25(OH)D in plasma showed significant decrease of 25(OH)D in mice treated with all agents (day 21) or in mice treated with calcitriol or PRI-2191 at all days of measurements (Fig. 3D).

The plasma concentration of 17β-estradiol was found to be significantly increased in control mice from days 21 to 28. Calcitriol on day 21 caused increase in plasma 17β-estradiol level when compared to control mice (P<0.05). Both analogs showed similar tendency (Fig. 3B).

Calcitriol and its analogs normalized tumor vasculature of 4T1 mammary gland cancer

We estimated the influence of calcitriol and its analogs on tumor angiogenesis. The results of the intravital ultrasound imaging of blood flow in tumor tissue as reflected by peak-enhancement and time-to-peak parameter values indicate that all compounds enhanced tumor blood perfusion (Fig. 4A–C). Calcitriol and its analogs significantly enhanced the time-to-peak parameter (mean value for control mice was 11.59 sec and mean value for mice treated with calcitriol, PRI-2191, and PRI-2205 was 13.76, 13.62 and 13.81 sec, respectively, P<0.05; Fig. 4A). After treatment with calcitriol, we observed statistically significant increase in case of values of peak-enhancement parameter when compared to the control group of animals [8.49 l.a.u. (linear arbitrary units) vs. 2.84 l.a.u.; Fig. 4B].

Simultaneously, we observed a significant decrease in VEGF levels in tumor tissue after treatment with calcitriol (1.08 pg/µg) and PRI-2205 (1.10 pg/µg) on day 14 when compared to the control mice (1.55 pg/µg; P<0.05). On day 28, we observed statistically significant decrease in VEGF levels in tumor tissue of control mice when compared to day 14. A further decrease in VEGF levels was observed after treatment with PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 on day 28 (Fig. 4D). The levels of thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1), an antiangiogenic factor, in tumor tissue decreased from days 14 to 28; however, its levels were not affected by treatment with calcitriol or its analogs (Fig. 4E). VEGF level in plasma on day 14 was not influenced by the treatments used in this study (Fig. 4F).

Induction of OPN mRNA (Spp1) by calcitriol and its analogs during the early phase of tumor progression

To identify the candidate genes that might be regulated by calcitriol and its analogs in the process of enhanced metastatic dissemination of 4T1 cells, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array screening was performed (88 tested genes listed in Table III). Data were analyzed for transcripts from tumors taken from mice at two time points: on day 14 and on day 28 after 4T1 tumor inoculation. We observed the expression of 46 out of 88 genes screened. The candidate genes were selected for further examination based on fold change compared to its expression in non-treated tumors [day 7, relative quantification (RQ) values presented in Table IV]. The expression of selected genes in tumor tissues was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis.

Table IV

The expression of genes associated with tumor invasion or metastasis evaluated in 4T1 tumor tissue after treatment with calcitriol or its analogs.

Table IV

The expression of genes associated with tumor invasion or metastasis evaluated in 4T1 tumor tissue after treatment with calcitriol or its analogs.

GeneControl
Calcitriol
PRI-2191
PRI-2205
D14D28D14D28D14D28D14D28
Adamts18.3002.7541.6533.9962.5344.0284.9592.247
Angpt143.5264.3251.5283.3422.8612.4682.5002.897
Casp85.7383.9311.3686.8655.4128.0163.1744.734
Cd8211.47610.2931.92910.8656.0527.0782.78619.504
Cdh25.4814.4071.6806.5472.6971.4343.6854.377
Cdh61.2011.0301.2492.2441.5881.9280.3941.578
Col1a16.0352.9212.0690.3620.8990.4860.7502.647
Col4a22.6371.8092.1932.4346.0102.8392.4446.133
Col6a113.0127.6191.2522.7121.5341.8421.7146.557
Cst72.6691.6661.8012.7273.5334.9333.0647.574
Ctgf18.55612.0080.76312.1201.8351.8882.5385.185
Ctsb2.8432.50015.1400.8920.1220.5550.4450.363
Ctsd15.52018.0115.1400.1071.9892.0800.9281.434
Ctsl16.49818.7924.3274.3510.4834.4821.1481.396
Cxcl13.5663.4804.9353.9496.1917.2343.04511.300
Drg15.2923.7401.2905.4934.3171.4521.0862.584
Flt15.8728.9001.6152.5052.5091.8310.9176.456
Gpi2.3341.8123.4713.1735.4543.6752.7744.742
Gsn1.2971.0011.1541.6831.6282.1281.2822.010
Id12.8552.1861.6371.9402.0162.6711.8002.287
Isg2010.27113.78511.89414.0613.26310.2192.15814.053
Jag115.66310.0471.7842.5975.59814.1296.3772.102
Map2k411.77010.1761.52220.2722.0634.9532.7793.258
Mcam2.3078.4931.9692.5672.6872.3961.2413.739
Metap22.1034.0643.0502.8005.1502.1490.6942.286
Mmp112.7483.9621.3756.6562.3895.5741.5473.540
Mmp1315.0926.51210.2864.2993.3374.4484.3856.341
Mmp148.4387.8083.0793.1220.9596.0572.3477.366
Mmp210.25725.8393.0433.7180.80117.3394.8692.932
Nedd92.3972.4211.5311.5211.4442.8462.4141.673
Nf21.3853.7782.1411.9821.6853.1013.0241.919
Nme25.0522.18011.1673.79631.4487.1177.19417.671
Nme43.3004.5482.3092.6921.34010.1435.2894.507
Pax53.5101.3503.7811.02521.8642.8871.5473.213
Pdgfa1.6672.2702.0021.5802.9658.5403.4731.574
Plaur2.1093.8743.2971.7852.1464.0601.9983.030
Ptgs25.1182.7973.3702.1492.7767.0535.0862.962
Runx11.9824.9251.4203.0900.7472.1291.5400.521
Serpine11.1640.5242.9180.7331.6620.9311.0910.830
Sparc1.2370.4863.5720.5453.3550.7981.3196.911
Spp11.1982.9902.2872.1181.2270.9821.3671.744
Src1.8461.8984.7731.3211.6761.7691.9271.547
Tgfb13.0585.3304.4151.1000.9401.8171.1872.014
Timp11.2481.3033.3950.9871.3620.6550.8910.583
Timp30.0680.0190.0540.0370.0950.6020.0430.064
Vegfa0.3070.1550.2240.0922.4610.1500.2080.100

[i] Tumors were collected on days 14 and 28 (after inoculation with 4T1 cells) from mice treated with calcitriol or its analogs and control group receiving 80% propylene glycol (vehicle for vitamin D analogs). Real-time PCR screening was performed using the mouse tumor invasion/metastasis PCR array library (MTIM-1). From 88 genes available in this array (Table III), the expression for 42 genes was not detected in 4T1 tumor tissue. Data presented as mean relative quantification (RQ) values (calculated from duplicate). Fold-change (RQ) of target cDNA was determined by calculating the differences in ΔΔCT values with reference to phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (Pgk1) by DataAssist v 3.01 software. All PCR amplification cycles were performed at 95°C for 10 sec and 58°C for 45 sec (50 cycles). We used 25 ng of cDNA for a single reaction, and each test was performed in duplicate.

Calcitriol and its analogs downregulated the expression of some genes coding growth factors and their receptors involved in tumor angiogenesis, the expression of which increased during 4T1 tumor progression [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (Flt1), transforming growth factor β1 (Tgfb1)]. However, the expression of connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf) and platelet-derived growth factor α (Pdgfa) was increased after treatment with calcitriol and its analogs (Fig. 5A). The expression of type VI collagen α1 (Col6a1) and matrix metallopeptidases 13 and 14 (Mmp13 and Mmp14) decreased, whereas the expression of Mmp2 increased in control tumor tissue between days 14 and 28 of tumor growth. Calcitriol and its analogs showed tendency to reduce the aforementioned gene mRNA levels when compared to control (Fig. 5A). Calcitriol and its analogs also decreased the expression of angiopoietin-like 4 gene (Angptl4; on both days 14 and 28 of measurement) and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (OPN; Spp1; on day 28). Increased expression of non-metastatic cells 2 (Nme2), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (Cxcl1), and cystatin F (leukocystatin; Cst7) in tumors from mice treated with all compounds was observed. However, developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1 (Drg1), cathepsins B and D (Ctsb and Ctsd), and Ctgf were downregulated by the administration of calcitriol and its analogs (except Ctsb after calcitriol treatment on day 14) (Fig. 5A).

We performed real-time PCR analysis of the following nine selected mRNAs: Drg1, Flt1, Spp1, neurofibromin 2 (merlin; Nf2), neural precursor cell expressed, dev. downregulated 9 (Nedd9), Mmp13, Mmp14, Tgfb and plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor (Plaur). The expression of Nf2, Nedd9, Mmp13, Mmp14 and Plaur significantly increased during tumor progression; however, calcitriol or its analogs (with the exception of upregulation of Flt1 by PRI-2205 and downregulation of Plaur by calcitriol) did not influence the expression of aforementioned mRNAs significantly. The mRNAs that were significantly influenced by calcitriol and its analogs were Spp1 and Drg1. The expression of Spp1 was significantly upregulated in tumor tissue by calcitriol and PRI-2205 on day 14 and by PRI-2205 on day 28. PRI-2191 downregulated Spp1 on day 28 (Fig. 5B). The expression of Drg1 (also known as Nedd3) was increased after treatment with calcitriol on days 14 and 28, but it decreased after treatment with PRI-2191 on day 28. In addition, significant decrease in the expression of Tgfb was observed in mice treated with calcitriol and PRI-2191 on day 14 when compared to control mice bearing tumors on day 7 (Fig. 5B).

Selected protein expression in tumors harvested from the mice treated with calcitriol and its analogs

First, we estimated the expression of the following receptors and transcription factors known as typical for calcitriol and/or typical for mammary gland cancer: VDR and retinoid X receptor (RXR), estrogen receptors ERα and β, nuclear factor κB (NFκB), inhibitor of κB (IκB), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), snail family transcriptional repressor 1 (SNAI1), as well as E- and N-cadherin - markers of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT).

VDR level increased during 4T1 tumor progression. In this study, calcitriol and its analogs decreased the levels of VDR (Fig. 6A). ERα level was decreased during 4T1 progression, whereas ERβ level remained unchanged. Furthermore, calcitriol and its analogs decreased the levels of ERβ on days 28 and 33 (Fig. 6A).

On day 21, a 2.5-fold increase in the ratio of E:N-cadherin in tumor tissues of mice administered with calcitriol and its analogs was observed. In control tumors, this ratio was ~1. However, during tumor growth progression, the ability of calcitriol and its analogs to increase the ratio of E:N-cadherin was not observed (Fig. 6B).

In this study, we evaluated also the protein levels of transcription factors, namely, SNAI1 and PTEN. We found that their levels increased at the end of the experiment, whereas the levels of NFκB and IκB increased on day 28 and then rapidly decreased on day 33. Calcitriol and its analogs did not influence the levels of SNAI1, PTEN, and IκB, whereas on days 21 and 33, PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 caused increase in their levels. On day 28, all studied compounds decreased the levels of NFκB (Fig. 6C).

Increased levels of OPN and decreased levels of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) in tumor tissue resulting from the treatment

The level of other proteins in tumor tissue was analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). OPN levels in control tumors increased significantly during 4T1 tumor progression. Calcitriol and its analogs further increased its level. Both analogs elevated OPN level from day 14. Calcitriol showed some delay in this activity but significantly increased the levels of OPN from day 28 (Fig. 7A). TGFβ level in tumor tissue was significantly lowered by treatment using calcitriol and its analogs when compared to control (Fig. 7A).

Plasma OPN level measured on selected days of treatment was found to be increased by calcitriol and its analogs, however, opposite effect was seen in case of TGFβ levels in plasma. TGFβ was undetected in control tumor-bearing mice on days 21 and 33 of treatment, as well as in mice treated with calcitriol on day 21. PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 increased TGFβ level significantly. TGFβ level also increased in mice treated with calcitriol (from undetectable levels in control mice to 30 pg/ml in mice treated with calcitriol on day 33) (Fig. 7B).

Modulating effect of calcitriol and its analogs on collagen deposits in tumor and lung tissue

Histochemical analysis of tumors collected from control mice showed increased collagen deposits in tumor tissue during neoplastic progression as showed by Masson's trichrome staining. Treatment with calcitriol and its analogs on day 21 further increased the collagen deposits but the content was significantly low on day 28 (Fig. 8).

In most specimens of lungs, connective tissue (collagen fibers) was seen as a green staining of fibers around the bronchi and bronchioles, large vessels, and alveolar elements. During tumor progression, we found a slight decrease in staining intensity in control mice; however, PRI-2191 as PRI-2205 did not show a difference in staining intensity when compared with control mice. Calcitriol treatment seem to increase collagen fiber deposits in lungs, primarily on days 14 and 28 (from ++ to even ++++) (Table II).

Aortic remodeling during tumor progression and treatment with calcitriol and its analogs

During 4T1 tumor progression, we observed changes in the structure of aorta. When tumor became palpable (day 7), the number of cell layers of tunica media (P<0.05) and tunica adventitia decreased when compared to healthy (day 0) mice. Next, on day 14, the number of tunica media and tunica adventitia layers in control tumor-bearing mice increased significantly when compared to healthy (D0) and/or tumor-bearing mice on day 7. On day 21, the number of tunica media and tunica adventitia layers did not change significantly. However, on the two last days of observation (days 28 and 33), the number of layers of tunica adventitia and tunica media decreased. In case of tunica media, the decrease in cell layers was greater and statistically significant (days 28 and 33) than that of healthy mice (day 0). The α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) staining decreased at the beginning of tumor growth (day 7) and then increased to the values similar to the healthy mice. Stained with von Willebrand factor (vWF), vasa vasorum endothelial cells decreased during 4T1 tumor progression and were not detectable on day 33. However, staining with anti-endoglin (CD105) antibody showed increased intensity on day 14 when compared to healthy (day 0) and tumor-bearing mice on day 7 (P<0.05). CD31 antigen of intima endothelial cells was unchanged during tumor growth in control tumor-bearing mice; however, endoglin significantly increased starting from day 7 (Fig. 9A).

Calcitriol and PRI-2205 decreased the number of tunica media layers on day 14 and PRI-2205 on day 21 (P<0.05). In the advanced stages of tumor development (days 28 and 33), both calcitriol and PRI-2191 increased the CD105 score. In mice treated with PRI-2205, the number of tunica media layers remained on the lower level similar to tumor-bearing mice on day 7. The number of tunica adventitia layers was affected by the tested compounds only in the earlier stages of tumor development. PRI-2205 significantly decreased the number of layers on days 14 and 21. The tendency to decrease the thickness of tunica adventitia of aorta was also observed in PRI-2191-treated mice. PRI-2205 tended to decrease CD31 (day 21) and CD105 intima-positive cells (days 28 and 33 with an exception on day 14, where significant increase was observed). A similar tendency was observed according to CD105 and vWF-positive cells in tunica adventitia. However, calcitriol and PRI-2191 increased the number of vWF stained adventitia cells. During the course of treatment, calcitriol increased the staining intensity of CD105 intima (days 14 and 33: P<0.05). PRI-2191 on day 14 significantly decreased CD105 staining of intima cells (Fig. 10).

The damage to endothelium observed in hematoxylin and eosin-stained aorta slices in general respond to changes in intima endoglin (CD105) staining (Fig. 9B). During this examination, the aortas showed no change (0) or a number of changes observed in terms of damage to the individual endothelial cells (marked +) or lying next to each other in a small space in a number of such locations (++), or endothelial cells invaded by erythrocytes and/or dissection (+++). Calcitriol and its analogs increased endothelium damage on day 14 (Fig. 9B).

Calcitriol and its analogs exert different action against metastatic 4T1 cells and its non-metastatic counterparts 67NR in vitro

This part of the study was performed to evaluate the direct influence of calcitriol and its analogs on 4T1 metastatic cells in vitro and compare the results with non-metastatic subline 67NR.

Calcitriol and its analogs inhibited proliferation of non-metastatic 67NR cells but did not influence 4T1 cell proliferation significantly (Fig. 11A and Table V). We used cisplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, tamoxifen, and camptothecin as the control anticancer drugs, to show the sensitivity of 4T1 cells for in vitro anticancer drugs in the same experimental condition as used for calcitriol and its analogs. Similar antiproliferative activities of most anticancer drugs were observed for both cell sublines. However, 4T1 cells revealed less sensitivity to tamoxifen and 5-fluorouracil when compared to 67NR cells (Table V).

Table V

Antiproliferative activity of tested compounds and positive controls against mammary gland cancer sublines: metastatic 4T1 and non-metastatic 67NR cells.

Table V

Antiproliferative activity of tested compounds and positive controls against mammary gland cancer sublines: metastatic 4T1 and non-metastatic 67NR cells.

Compound4T1 cells67NR cells

IC50 (nM)
Calcitriol25.04±9.30
PRI-219123.52±5.93
PRI-2205230.73±12.14

IC50 (µg/ml)

Cisplatin0.38±0.0900.30±0.050
Doxorubicin0.04±0.0020.05±0.012
Docetaxel0.01±0.0001.20±0.990
Camptothecin0.03±0.0030.04±0.036
5-fluorouracil0.46±0.0440.11±0.079a
Tamoxifen3.05±0.2371.46±0.164a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-ijo-52-01-0103'] } The inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50) value is defined as the concentration of a compound that corresponds to a 50% growth inhibition. Experiments were repeated three times in triplicates. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

a P<0.05, Student's t-test.

According to our results, 67NR cells secreted OPN into the culture medium and it increased significantly during the time of incubation. However, in case of 4T1 cells, OPN secretion increased up to 48 h of incubation and the level was maintained up to 72 h (Fig. 11B). Furthermore, 4T1 cells secreted significantly higher levels of OPN than that of 67NR cells, and calcitriol and its analogs (100 nM) did not alter its levels (Fig. 11B). Starting from 48 h of incubation, calcitriol and both analogs significantly increased the secretion of OPN by 67NR cells (Fig. 11B, right graph). After 72 h of incubation with 100 nM calcitriol and its analogs, the levels of E- and N-cadherin, β-catenin, VDR, RXRα, and ERα were measured. The results are presented in Fig. 12. Calcitriol and its analogs did not affect the expression of aforementioned proteins in 4T1 cells. The results also show that 4T1 and 67NR cells expressed similar level of N-cadherin, and this expression was increased significantly in 67NR cells by calcitriol or its analogs. The 67NR cells did not express E-cadherin. The expression of β-catenin, and VDR proteins were higher in 4T1 than in 67NR cells. Calcitriol increases significantly the expression of β-catenin in 67NR cells. On the other hand, the expression of RXRα and ERα was significantly lower in 4T1 than 67NR cells. Calcitriol (ERα) or calcitriol and its analogs (RXRα) increased the expression of these proteins significantly only in 67NR cells. The expression of vitamin D metabolizing enzymes namely, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 were unchanged in 4T1 cells after treatment with the tested compounds. However, in case of 67NR cells, the expression of both the enzymes increased significantly after incubation with calcitriol or its analogs (Fig. 12).

Discussion

In this study, we conducted experiments on the mouse 4T1 mammary gland cancer cells transplanted into the mammary fat pad of the immune-competent BALB/c female mice. This research model is commonly used for late-stage (IV) basal-like human breast cancer model because similar to that observed in humans 4T1 cells spontaneously metastasize via hematogenous route into lungs, brain, liver or bones (34). Moreover, 4T1 tumor progression is accompanied by the activation of the platelets (36) and of host immune cells (37), thus it provides a model for the studies on a broad range of metastatic features.

Banka et al (38) showed that the expression of endogenous ERα was not detected in 4T1 breast carcinoma cells. Moreover, estrogens did not induce proliferation or Erk1/2 phosphorylation of 4T1 cells in vitro. However, estrogens can stimulate metastasis of such ER-negative tumors (39,40). Our study, similarly to other research (41), revealed that 4T1 tumors express ERα and β, and according to our results, the level of ERα decreased throughout tumor progression, whereas the level of ERβ remained unchanged. In cell culture studies, 4T1 cells did not show sensitivity to antiproliferative activity of calcitriol or its analogs (PRI-2191 and PRI-2205) as presented in this study and previously (27). Moreover, the in vivo experiment conducted on mice bearing 4T1 tumors transplanted orthotopically have shown that PRI-2205 did not affect the growth of primary tumors significantly, but enhanced the metastatic potential of 4T1 cells when used alone. However, when combined with cyclophosphamide, PRI-2205 improved its effectiveness (27). Now, in two independent experiments, we have shown that calcitriol and its analogs (PRI-2191 and PRI-2205) did not influence the primary tumor growth but increased the metastatic potential of 4T1 cells. Although calcitriol was used in lower dose (0.5 µg/kg) than other analogs, its toxicity was visible and manifested as a reduction in body weight and a rise in serum calcium level.

The significance of OPN (encoded by the Spp1) as a key molecule in the progression and metastasis of 4T1 cancer cells has been previously described (42,43). Moreover, OPN is correlated with advanced stage and metastasis of breast (44) and other (4547) tumors and with resistance to chemotherapy (48). OPN revealed its activity using a number of receptors, including the integrins αv β1, β3, or β5 and α4, α5, α8, or α9 β1, and it may also be a ligand for CD44 receptor (4952). Directly through activation of these receptors or indirectly, OPN acts as a chemotactic agent for macrophages and stimulates proinflammatory activity of macrophages, fibroblasts, natural killer (NK) cells, and endothelial cells, thereby inducing angiogenesis and collagen deposits (50,53,54). Furthermore, vitamin D responsive element (VDRE) in the promoter region of Spp1 has been reported (55), and the enhancement of OPN levels was found in various cells treated with calcitriol and its analogs (5561).

In this study, in control tumor-bearing mice, the tumor OPN level increased, but tumor VEGF level decreased with progression of neoplasia. This is inconsistent with the data suggesting that exogenous, as well as tumor-derived OPN augments both VEGF mRNA and VEGF protein levels in breast cancer (54,62). However, in our tumor model, similar to other studies (63,64), the expression of mesenchymal markers such as SNAI1 and N-cadherin increased in subsequent days of tumor growth, whereas the expression of E-cadherin, typical for epithelial phenotype, decreased.

In the in vitro studies by Xu et al on rat mammary gland cancer cells, OPN levels were found to be increased by calcitriol and its analogs. Nevertheless, suppression of β-catenin and upregulation of E-cadherin signaling was also noted, as authors suggest this can neutralize such adverse effect of calcitriol inducing OPN secretion (56). In our research model, calcitriol and its analogs did not influence the secretion of OPN into the culture medium of 4T1 cells and did not influence the levels of β-catenin, E-cadherin or N-cadherin in vitro. 67NR cell subline has been described as less invasive (65) and despite a lower level of VDR than in 4T1 cells, 67NR cells are sensitive to the induction of OPN secretion, as well as, for example, upregulation of N-cadherin expression by calcitriol and its analogs (our studies). Moreover, in this study, non-treated 67NR cells secreted lower levels of OPN into the culture medium than that of 4T1 cells as described in the literature related to a less invasive phenotype (42).

However, in in vivo experiments, we observed induction of OPN in 4T1 tumor tissue after treatment with calcitriol and its analogs. Therefore, in our in vivo 4T1 tumor model, OPN induction by calcitriol and its analogs is not cancer cell-derived but rather host-cell derived. This is also supported by the fact that only a weak tendency to upregulate the ratio of E:N cadherins at the beginning and at the end of experiment by calcitriol and its analogs were observed, despite decreased tumor TGFβ [known cytokine driving epithelial to mesenchymal transition (66)] level by the treatment used.

With the increase in OPN levels in tumor tissue, after treatment with vitamin D compounds, we observed a decrease in tumor VEGF level. In parallel, the tumor blood perfusion was improved by all compounds, which could mean tumor vasculature normalization via VEGF depletion (67,68). However, in this study, we found an increased activation of aortal endothelium (increase of endoglin staining) during tumor growth and remodeling of tunica media and adventitia. Calcitriol further increased the activation of endothelial cells as measured by endoglin expression (PRI-2191 showed similar trend, but PRI-2205 was the opposite at the end of the experiment) and increased vascularization in tunica adventitia (increased vWF staining). These changes in the activity of endothelial cells outside the tumor tissue correlated with plasma 17β-estrogen and TGFβ level. OPN is known for its ability to enhance the migration, homing, and differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) (69). According to a study, the activity of estrogens as accelerators of the endothelial repair requires OPN, both for bone marrow-derived cell recruitment and for endothelial cell migration and proliferation (70). Apart from the localized action of OPN in tumor tissue, it has been documented that tumor or host-produced OPN influences metastatic niche establishment significantly. Sangaletti et al have shown that the host-derived OPN, primarily from myeloid cells, form the immunosuppressive environment in metastatic niche in the lungs facilitating lung metastatic foci formation (43). Moreover, low concentrations of TGFβ (decreased tumor concentration of TGFβ was observed in our studies) can promote blood vessel formation. However, higher amounts can be antiangiogenic (7173). TGFβ also revealed direct effects on endothelial cell growth and migration and also on the regulation of the activation state of the endothelium (74,75). Therefore, normalized tumor blood vasculature with activated endothelium (as we showed in aorta sections) driven by tumor OPN, plasma estrogens, and TGFβ overexpression may lead to the induction of metastasis by calcitriol and its analogs.

TGFβ is a cytokine that acts as a tumor suppressor when directed to normal cells, whereas it acts as a tumor promoting factor when directed to cancer cells. The action of TGFβ on tumor cells can be direct, inducing invasive phenotype in these cells or indirect conducing tumor-permissive micro-environment (76). Stromal collagenous extracellular matrix, primarily produced by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), is associated with increased risk of metastasis; TGFβ produced by cancer cells and/or CAFs promotes its accumulation. Inhibition of fibrosis using TGFβ antagonist can support inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis (77). In addition, OPN is identified as molecule reprogramming fibroblasts to tumor-promoting, proinflammatory CAFs in breast tumor tissue (78). Furthermore, Weber et al proved that the transformation of mesenchymal stem cells to CAFs initialized by OPN is mediated via TGFβ pathway (79). This OPN-TGFβ relationship may explain the initial increase in collagen deposits in tumor tissue by tested compounds, probably stimulated by OPN activity with enough TGFβ level in tumor microenvironment contributing to increased metastasis observed in our studies. In more advanced cancer stage, tumor collagen deposits were decreased by vitamin D compound treatments probably via tumor TGFβ downregulation, despite the high levels of OPN. In addition, in vitro experiments of others showed that calcitriol and its analogs induce TGFβ mRNA and protein level in an ER-negative breast cancer cell line (80). However, calcitriol is known to repress collagen synthesis in a number of cells by the interference with the TGFβ-activated pathway (reviewed in refs. 81,82). Therefore, this potentially positive tumor TGFβ downregulating activity of calcitriol and its analogs is probably predominated by the impact of OPN on CAFs. It led to collagen prometastatic action in earlier steps of tumor progression as well as increased plasma TGFβ levels in later stages. Elevated TGFβ plasma level is proposed as a marker of metastatic breast cancer with poor prognosis (83). Moreover, TGFβ is known to modulate regulatory T-cell (Treg) differentiation, which suppress antitumor T cell response (84). TGFβ also promotes the differentiation of tumor-promoting tumor-associated macrophages (M2), and tumor-associated neutrophils (N2) (85,86). Wculek and Malanchi have also shown that in the mouse 4T1 mammary gland cancer model neutrophils in lung premetastatic niche support metastatic potential of cancer cells (87). In the same tumor model, the co-injection of M2 macrophages into the mammary fat pads of mice increased solid tumor growth and lung metastasis (88).

Similarly, the tendency to decrease nuclear factor-ĸB (NFκB) transcription factor, observed in this study on day 28 and an increase observed on day 33, probably is the result of action of calcitriol and its analogs on tumor-associated cells as CAFs or immune cells. Adams and Teegarden have shown that calcitriol inhibits apoptosis in C3H10T1/2 murine fibroblast cells through activation of NFκB (89), whereas Cohen-Lahav et al have demonstrated that calcitriol inhibits the expression of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) in macrophages by increasing inhibitory protein IĸBα and decreasing the activity of NFĸB (90). Therefore, further studies on isolated tumor macrophages and fibroblasts are highly warranted in order to explain the impact of calcitriol and its analogs on NFĸB transcription factor in tumor tissue.

In this study, we observed that during the 4T1 tumor progression, VDR levels increased and the highest level was observed on the last day of the experiment. Calcitriol and its analogs tend to decrease the level of VDR, especially at the end of the experiment. Williams et al showed that VDR knockdown in 168FARN tumor cells as well as diet-induced vitamin D deficiency accelerates tumor growth and metastasis. Moreover, VDR signaling suppressed inhibitor of DNA binding 1 gene (Id1) expression, and there was a negative association between circulating 25(OH)D levels and the expression of ID1 in primary tumors from breast cancer patients (91). The 168FARN cell line is derived from the same single mouse mammary tumor as 4T1 or 67NR used in our studies and is non-metastatic (92). Because Williams et al concluded that the loss of VDR signaling is sufficient to convert the cells from non-metastatic to metastatic state (91), therefore, even slight decrease in VDR level after treatment with calcitriol or its analogs observed in our studies could contribute to the observed elevation of metastases in the lungs of mice. However, this decrease may concern tumor stromal cells and therefore does not appear to be correlated with Id1 expression, which remained almost unchanged in tumor tissue taken from mice treated with tested compounds in our PCR screening studies. Moreover, as we have shown in in vitro studies, 4T1 cells expressed greater amount of VDR than 67NR cells, the isogenic cell line derived from the same primary breast cancer but non-metastatic (92,93). However, VDR in 4T1 cell line does not respond to calcitriol or its analogs in vitro. This is emphasized by lack of changes even in the expression of vitamin D metabolizing enzymes such as CYP27B1 (which converts the precursor form of vitamin D metabolite, 25-OH-D, to the active metabolite, calcitriol) and CYP24A1 (which degrades calcitriol). Expression of these enzymes is directly regulated by calcitriol (94,95). The insensitivity of cancer cells to the action of calcitriol or its analogs despite the presence of VDR can be explained by various epigenetic mechanisms such as promoter hypermethylation (96), elevated nuclear receptor co-repressor 1 (NCoR1) (97), silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) (98), and histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes (97). Moreover, Zhi et al have shown that the tyrosine phosphatase PTPH1 stimulates breast cancer growth through regulating VDR expression/localization. PTPH1 binds to VDR and increases its cytoplasmic accumulation leading to their stabilization. Deficiency of a nuclear located VDR abolishes the growth-inhibitory activity of the receptor (99). Nevertheless, further studies are needed to determine whether this mechanism is responsible for the insensitivity of 4T1 cells to calcitriol despite the presence of the receptor and how these mechanisms may be associated with increased metastasis under the influence of calcitriol.

However, in our previous studies using the human and mouse colon cancer model transplanted subcutaneously or orthotopically, we observed that both calcitriol analogs increased VDR level in colon tumor tissue, and when used with 5-fluorouracil, PRI-2191 decreased the number of lymph node metastases (21,30). We also correlated these observations with the increased E-cadherin levels after calcitriol or PRI-2191 treatment (30). It seems that the use of strategies that can 'activate' VDR should be tested to sensitize 4T1 cells to calcitriol. It can lead to direct influence of calcitriol on cancer cells [inhibitory effect, as in 67NR, 168FARN (91), or our colon cancer models (21,30)] and to predominance of direct tumor-suppressive effects over indirect, host related tumor-conducive ones.

Our results for the first time indicated that the treatment with calcitriol or its analogs may lead to the acceleration of metastatic process. There are published data proving that calcitriol or its analogs inhibit growth of breast cancer xenografts (100,101) or transplantable mouse mammary gland cancer (23,102). Moreover studies by Williams et al showed accelerated primary mammary gland tumor (MMTV-wt) growth upon vitamin D deficient diet (91). Rossdeutsher et al, using non-immunodeficient model of spontaneous mammary gland cancer MMTV-PyMT, showed that exogenous 25(OH)D delays neoplasia, tumor growth, and metastasis (103). On the other hand, Ooi et al proved in experimental bone metastasis model of human breast cancer cell xenotransplantation, that vitamin D deficiency promotes the growth of human breast cancer cells in the bones of nude mice (104). However, both cancer cell lines used in these studies were sensitive to vitamin D action (103,104). The 4T1 cells, although expressing VDR, are not sensitive to calcitriol: cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo was not affected upon treatment. Therefore, calcitriol or its analogs in the body milieu modified by 4T1 cells exerts its specific action on sensitive host cells and by such indirect way accelerate metastatic process.

In conclusion, we have shown that calcitriol and its analogs enhance the metastatic potential of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer inducing OPN secretion by host cells (macrophages, endothelial cells, or CAFs) in tumor tissue. Overexpression of OPN in tumor tissue prevailed over the decreased tumor TGFβ level and blood vessel normalization via tumor VEGF deprivation induced by calcitriol or its analogs. Furthermore, induced plasma TGFβ and 17β-estradiol levels can contribute to the facilitation of metastatic process via promoting metastatic niche formation (Fig. 13). Collectively these data indicate that caution should be taken with the use of vitamin D in breast cancer therapy. However, further studies are needed to show what characteristics of tumor cells modulating tumor microenvironment are responsible for the predominance of vitamin D prometastatic effects.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Science Center granted on the basis of the decision number DEC-2013/11/B/NZ5/00162. This study was also supported by Wroclaw Center of Biotechnology within a program - The Leading National Research Center (KNOW) for years 2014-2018.

References

1 

Cossetti RJD, Tyldesley SK, Speers CH, Zheng Y and Gelmon KA: Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008. J Clin Oncol. 33:65–73. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Riemsma R, Forbes CA, Kessels A, Lykopoulos K, Amonkar MM, Rea DW and Kleijnen J: Systematic review of aromatase inhibitors in the first-line treatment for hormone sensitive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 123:9–24. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Dutta U and Pant K: Aromatase inhibitors: Past, present and future in breast cancer therapy. Med Oncol. 25:113–124. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Brown SA and Guise TA: Cancer treatment-related bone disease. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 19:47–60. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Datta M and Schwartz GG: Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation and loss of bone mineral density in women undergoing breast cancer therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 88:613–624. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Rizzoli R, Body JJ, Brandi ML, Cannata-Andia J, Chappard D, El Maghraoui A, Glüer CC, Kendler D, Napoli N, Papaioannou A, et al International Osteoporosis Foundation Committee of Scientific Advisors Working Group on Cancer-Induced Bone Disease: Cancer-associated bone disease. Osteoporos Int. 24:2929–2953. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Coleman R, Body JJ, Aapro M and Hadji P: Bone health in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 25(Suppl 3): iii124–iii137. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Coleman RE, Rathbone E and Brown JE: Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 9:365–374. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Cepa M and Vaz C: Management of bone loss in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors. Acta Reumatol Port. 40:323–330. 2015.

10 

Hant FN and Bolster MB: Drugs that may harm bone: Mitigating the risk. Cleve Clin J Med. 83:281–288. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Brant J: Vitamin D in the prevention of aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms: Is it ready for practice? J Adv Pract Oncol. 3:245–248. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Jacobs ET, Kohler LN, Kunihiro AG and Jurutka PW: Vitamin D and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers: A review of the epidemiological evidence. J Cancer. 7:232–240. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Giovannucci E and Feldman BJ: The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 14:342–357. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Jacot W, Pouderoux S, Thezenas S, Chapelle A, Bleuse JP, Romieu G and Lamy PJ: Increased prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 134:709–717. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Singer O, Cigler T, Moore AB, Levine AB, Do HT and Mandl LA: Hypovitaminosis D is a predictor of aromatase inhibitor musculoskeletal symptoms. Breast J. 20:174–179. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

LaPorta E and Welsh J: Modeling vitamin D actions in triple negative/basal-like breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 144A:65–73. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Peppone LJ, Rickles AS, Janelsins MC, Insalaco MR and Skinner KA: The association between breast cancer prognostic indicators and serum 25-OH vitamin D levels. Ann Surg Oncol. 19:2590–2599. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Ness RA, Miller DD and Li W: The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention. Chin J Nat Med. 13:481–497. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Horst R, Prapong S, Reinhardt T, Koszewski N, Knutson J and Bishop C: Comparison of the relative effects of 1,24-dihydroxyvitamin D(2) [1,24-(OH)(2)D(2)], 1,24-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,24-(OH)(2)D(3)], and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25-(OH) (2)D(3)] on selected vitamin D-regulated events in the rat. Biochem Pharmacol. 60:701–708. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wietrzyk J, Pełczyńska M, Madej J, Dzimira S, Kuśnierczyk H, Kutner A, Szelejewski W and Opolski A: Toxicity and antineoplastic effect of (24R)-1,24-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (PRI-2191). Steroids. 69:629–635. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Milczarek M, Filip-Psurska B, Swiętnicki W, Kutner A and Wietrzyk J: Vitamin D analogs combined with 5-fluorouracil in human HT-29 colon cancer treatment. Oncol Rep. 32:491–504. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Wietrzyk J, Chodyński M, Fitak H, Wojdat E, Kutner A and Opolski A: Antitumor properties of diastereomeric and geometric analogs of vitamin D3. Anticancer Drugs. 18:447–457. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Milczarek M, Chodyński M, Filip-Psurska B, Martowicz A, Krupa M, Krajewski K, Kutner A and Wietrzyk J: Synthesis and biological activity of diastereomeric and geometric analogs of calcipotriol, PRI-2202 and PRI-2205, against human HL-60 leukemia and MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). 5:1355–1378. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Filip B, Milczarek M, Wietrzyk J, Chodyński M and Kutner A: Antitumor properties of (5e,7e) analogs of vitamin D3. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 121:399–402. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hisatake J, Kubota T, Hisatake Y, Uskokovic M, Tomoyasu S and Koeffler HP: 5,6-trans-16-ene-vitamin D3: A new class of potent inhibitors of proliferation of prostate, breast, and myeloid leukemic cells. Cancer Res. 59:4023–4029. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Opolski A, Wietrzyk J, Siwinska A, Marcinkowska E, Chrobak A, Radzikowski C and Kutner A: Biological activity in vitro of side-chain modified analogues of calcitriol. Curr Pharm Des. 6:755–765. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Wietrzyk J, Nevozhay D, Filip B, Milczarek M and Kutner A: The antitumor effect of lowered doses of cytostatics combined with new analogs of vitamin D in mice. Anticancer Res. 27A:3387–3398. 2007.

28 

Wietrzyk J, Milczarek M and Kutner A: The effect of combined treatment on head and neck human cancer cell lines with novel analogs of calcitriol and cytostatics. Oncol Res. 16:517–525. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Wietrzyk J, Nevozhay D, Milczarek M, Filip B and Kutner A: Toxicity and antitumor activity of the vitamin D analogs PRI-1906 and PRI-1907 in combined treatment with cyclophosphamide in a mouse mammary cancer model. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 62:787–797. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Milczarek M, Psurski M, Kutner A and Wietrzyk J: Vitamin D analogs enhance the anticancer activity of 5-fluorouracil in an in vivo mouse colon cancer model. BMC Cancer. 13:2942013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Maj E, Filip-Psurska B, Świtalska M, Kutner A and Wietrzyk J: Vitamin D analogs potentiate the antitumor effect of imatinib mesylate in a human A549 lung tumor model. Int J Mol Sci. 16:27191–27207. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Blazejczyk A, Papiernik D, Porshneva K, Sadowska J and Wietrzyk J: Endothelium and cancer metastasis: Perspectives for antimetastatic therapy. Pharmacol Rep. 67:711–718. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Chodyński M, Wietrzyk J, Marcinkowska E, Opolski A, Szelejewski W and Kutner A: Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of side-chain unsaturated and homologated analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(2). (24E)-(1s)-24-Dehydro-24a-homo-1,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol and congeners. Steroids. 67:789–798. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

34 

DuPré SA, Redelman D and Hunter KW Jr: The mouse mammary carcinoma 4T1: Characterization of the cellular landscape of primary tumours and metastatic tumour foci. Int J Exp Pathol. 88:351–360. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Nevozhay D: Cheburator software for automatically calculating drug inhibitory concentrations from in vitro screening assays. PLoS One. 9:e1061862014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Wenzel J, Zeisig R and Fichtner I: Inhibition of metastasis in a murine 4T1 breast cancer model by liposomes preventing tumor cell-platelet interactions. Clin Exp Metastasis. 27:25–34. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

DuPre' SA and Hunter KW Jr: Murine mammary carcinoma 4T1 induces a leukemoid reaction with splenomegaly: Association with tumor-derived growth factors. Exp Mol Pathol. 82:12–24. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Banka CL, Lund CV, Nguyen MTN, Pakchoian AJ, Mueller BM and Eliceiri BP: Estrogen induces lung metastasis through a host compartment-specific response. Cancer Res. 66:3667–3672. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

MacRitchie AN, Jun SS, Chen Z, German Z, Yuhanna IS, Sherman TS and Shaul PW: Estrogen upregulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression in fetal pulmonary artery endothelium. Circ Res. 81:355–362. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Yang X, Belosay A, Du M, Fan TM, Turner RT, Iwaniec UT and Helferich WG: Estradiol increases ER-negative breast cancer metastasis in an experimental model. Clin Exp Metastasis. 30:711–721. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Garcia CM de S, de Araújo MR, Lopes MTP, Ferreira MAND and Cassali GD: Morphological and immunophenotipical characterization of murine mammary carcinoma 4t1. Braz J Vet Pathol. 7:158–165. 2014.

42 

Mi Z, Guo H, Wai PY, Gao C, Wei J and Kuo PC: Differential osteopontin expression in phenotypically distinct subclones of murine breast cancer cells mediates metastatic behavior. J Biol Chem. 279:46659–46667. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Sangaletti S, Tripodo C, Sandri S, Torselli I, Vitali C, Ratti C, Botti L, Burocchi A, Porcasi R, Tomirotti A, et al: Osteopontin shapes immunosuppression in the metastatic niche. Cancer Res. 74:4706–4719. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Pang H, Lu H, Song H, Meng Q, Zhao Y, Liu N, Lan F, Liu Y, Yan S, Dong X, et al: Prognostic values of osteopontin-c, E-cadherin and β-catenin in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 37:985–992. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Chang P-L, Harkins L, Hsieh Y-H, Hicks P, Sappayatosok K, Yodsanga S, Swasdison S, Chambers AF, Elmets CA and Ho KJ: Osteopontin expression in normal skin and non-melanoma skin tumors. J Histochem Cytochem. 56:57–66. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Yin M, Soikkeli J, Jahkola T, Virolainen S, Saksela O and Hölttä E: Osteopontin promotes the invasive growth of melanoma cells by activating integrin αvβ3 and down-regulating tetraspanin CD9. Am J Pathol. 184:842–858. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Sulpice L, Rayar M, Desille M, Turlin B, Fautrel A, Boucher E, Llamas-Gutierrez F, Meunier B, Boudjema K, Clément B, et al: Molecular profiling of stroma identifies osteopontin as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 58:1992–2000. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Pang H, Cai L, Yang Y, Chen X, Sui G and Zhao C: Knockdown of osteopontin chemosensitizes MDA-MB-231 cells to cyclophosphamide by enhancing apoptosis through activating p38 MAPK pathway. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 26:165–173. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Denhardt DT, Noda M, O'Regan AW, Pavlin D and Berman JS: Osteopontin as a means to cope with environmental insults: Regulation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cell survival. J Clin Invest. 107:1055–1061. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Kon S, Nakayama Y, Matsumoto N, Ito K, Kanayama M, Kimura C, Kouro H, Ashitomi D, Matsuda T and Uede T: A novel cryptic binding motif, LRSKSRSFQVSDEQY, in the C-terminal fragment of MMP-3/7-cleaved osteopontin as a novel ligand for α9β1 integrin is involved in the anti-type II collagen antibody-induced arthritis. PLoS One. 9:e1162102014. View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Barry ST, Ludbrook SB, Murrison E and Horgan CM: A regulated interaction between alpha5beta1 integrin and osteopontin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 267:764–769. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Helluin O, Chan C, Vilaire G, Mousa S, DeGrado WF and Bennett JS: The activation state of alphavbeta 3 regulates platelet and lymphocyte adhesion to intact and thrombin-cleaved osteopontin. J Biol Chem. 275:18337–18343. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Kale S, Raja R, Thorat D, Soundararajan G, Patil TV and Kundu GC: Osteopontin signaling upregulates cyclooxy-genase-2 expression in tumor-associated macrophages leading to enhanced angiogenesis and melanoma growth via α9β1 integrin. Oncogene. 33:2295–2306. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Raja R, Kale S, Thorat D, Soundararajan G, Lohite K, Mane A, Karnik S and Kundu GC: Hypoxia-driven osteopontin contributes to breast tumor growth through modulation of HIF1α-mediated VEGF-dependent angiogenesis. Oncogene. 33:2053–2064. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Noda M, Vogel RL, Craig AM, Prahl J, DeLuca HF and Denhardt DT: Identification of a DNA sequence responsible for binding of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 enhancement of mouse secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP-1 or osteopontin) gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:9995–9999. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Xu H, McCann M, Zhang Z, Posner GH, Bingham V, El-Tanani M and Campbell FC: Vitamin D receptor modulates the neoplastic phenotype through antagonistic growth regulatory signals. Mol Carcinog. 48:758–772. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Lau WL, Leaf EM, Hu MC, Takeno MM, Kuro-o M, Moe OW and Giachelli CM: Vitamin D receptor agonists increase klotho and osteopontin while decreasing aortic calcification in mice with chronic kidney disease fed a high phosphate diet. Kidney Int. 82:1261–1270. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Hu B, Zhou H, Gao H, Liu Y, Yan T, Zou L and Chen L: IFN-γ inhibits osteopontin expression in human decidual stromal cells and can be attenuated by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Am J Reprod Immunol. 68:353–361. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Chang PL, Ridall AL and Prince CW: Calcitriol regulation of osteopontin expression in mouse epidermal cells. Endocrinology. 135:863–869. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Chang PL and Prince CW: 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 stimulates synthesis and secretion of nonphosphorylated osteopontin (secreted phosphoprotein 1) in mouse JB6 epidermal cells. Cancer Res. 51:2144–2150. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

61 

Blomberg Jensen M, Jørgensen A, Nielsen JE, Steinmeyer A, Leffers H, Juul A and Rajpert-De Meyts E: Vitamin D metabolism and effects on pluripotency genes and cell differentiation in testicular germ cell tumors in vitro and in vivo. Neoplasia. 14:952–963. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Chakraborty G, Jain S and Kundu GC: Osteopontin promotes vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent breast tumor growth and angiogenesis via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Cancer Res. 68:152–161. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Das S, Samant RS and Shevde LA: Nonclassical activation of Hedgehog signaling enhances multidrug resistance and makes cancer cells refractory to smoothened-targeting Hedgehog inhibition. J Biol Chem. 288:11824–11833. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Shevde LA and Samant RS: Role of osteopontin in the pathophysiology of cancer. Matrix Biol. 37:131–141. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Johnstone CN, Smith YE, Cao Y, Burrows AD, Cross RS, Ling X, Redvers RP, Doherty JP, Eckhardt BL, Natoli AL, et al: Functional and molecular characterisation of EO771.LMB tumours, a new C57BL/6-mouse-derived model of spontaneously metastatic mammary cancer. Dis Model Mech. 8:237–251. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Yu Y, Xiao C-H, Tan L-D, Wang Q-S, Li X-Q and Feng Y-M: Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells through paracrine TGF-β signalling. Br J Cancer. 110:724–732. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Inai T, Mancuso M, Hashizume H, Baffert F, Haskell A, Baluk P, Hu-Lowe DD, Shalinsky DR, Thurston G, Yancopoulos GD, et al: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. Am J Pathol. 165:35–52. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Maj E, Papiernik D and Wietrzyk J: Antiangiogenic cancer treatment: The great discovery and greater complexity (Review). Int J Oncol. 49:1773–1784. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

69 

Molin DGM, van den Akker NM and Post MJ: Affirmative action of osteopontin on endothelial progenitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 28:2099–2100. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Leen LLS, Filipe C, Billon A, Garmy-Susini B, Jalvy S, Robbesyn F, Daret D, Allières C, Rittling SR, Werner N, et al: Estrogen-stimulated endothelial repair requires osteopontin. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 28:2131–2136. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Pepper MS: Transforming growth factor-beta: Vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vessel wall integrity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 8:21–43. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Costanza B, Umelo IA, Bellier J, Castronovo V and Turtoi A: Stromal modulators of TGF-β in cancer. J Clin Med. 6:72017. View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Nakagawa T, Li JH, Garcia G, Mu W, Piek E, Böttinger EP, Chen Y, Zhu HJ, Kang DH, Schreiner GF, et al: TGF-β induces proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors via parallel but distinct Smad pathways. Kidney Int. 66:605–613. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Orlova VV, Liu Z, Goumans M-J and ten Dijke P: Controlling angiogenesis by two unique TGF-β type I receptor signaling pathways. Histol Histopathol. 26:1219–1230. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

75 

Goumans M-J, Valdimarsdottir G, Itoh S, Rosendahl A, Sideras P and ten Dijke P: Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-beta type I receptors. EMBO J. 21:1743–1753. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Khan Z and Marshall JF: The role of integrins in TGFβ activation in the tumour stroma. Cell Tissue Res. 365:657–673. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Takai K, Le A, Weaver VM and Werb Z: Targeting the cancer-associated fibroblasts as a treatment in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget. 7:82889–82901. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

78 

Sharon Y, Raz Y, Cohen N, Ben-Shmuel A, Schwartz H, Geiger T and Erez N: Tumor-derived osteopontin reprograms normal mammary fibroblasts to promote inflammation and tumor growth in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 75:963–973. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Weber CE, Kothari AN, Wai PY, Li NY, Driver J, Zapf MA, Franzen CA, Gupta GN, Osipo C, Zlobin A, et al: Osteopontin mediates an MzF1-TGF-β1-dependent transformation of mesenchymal stem cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts in breast cancer. Oncogene. 34:4821–4833. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Koli K and Keski-Oja J: 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 enhances the expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 and its latent form binding protein in cultured breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 55:1540–1546. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

81 

Shany S, Sigal-Batikoff I and Lamprecht S: Vitamin D and myofibroblasts in fibrosis and cancer: At cross-purposes with TGF-β/SMAD signaling. Anticancer Res. 36:6225–6234. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

82 

Tao Q, Wang B, Zheng Y, Jiang X, Pan Z and Ren J: Vitamin D prevents the intestinal fibrosis via induction of vitamin D receptor and inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta1/Smad3 pathway. Dig Dis Sci. 60:868–875. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

83 

Ivanović V, Demajo M, Krtolica K, Krajnović M, Konstantinović M, Baltić V, Prtenjak G, Stojiljković B, Breberina M, Nesković-Konstantinović Z, et al: Elevated plasma TGF-β1 levels correlate with decreased survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. Clin Chim Acta. 371:191–193. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

84 

Moo-Young TA, Larson JW, Belt BA, Tan MC, Hawkins WG, Eberlein TJ, Goedegebuure PS and Linehan DC: Tumor-derived TGF-beta mediates conversion of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a murine model of pancreas cancer. J Immunother. 32:12–21. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

85 

Gong D, Shi W, Yi SJ, Chen H, Groffen J and Heisterkamp N: TGFβ signaling plays a critical role in promoting alternative macrophage activation. BMC Immunol. 13:312012. View Article : Google Scholar

86 

Fridlender ZG, Sun J, Kim S, Kapoor V, Cheng G, Ling L, Worthen GS and Albelda SM: Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: 'N1' versus 'N2' TAN. Cancer Cell. 16:183–194. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

87 

Wculek SK and Malanchi I: Neutrophils support lung colonization of metastasis-initiating breast cancer cells. Nature. 528:413–417. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

88 

Cho HJ, Jung JI, Lim DY, Kwon GT, Her S, Park JH and Park JHY: Bone marrow-derived, alternatively activated macrophages enhance solid tumor growth and lung metastasis of mammary carcinoma cells in a Balb/C mouse orthotopic model. Breast Cancer Res. 14:R812012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

89 

Adams LS and Teegarden D: 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol inhibits apoptosis in C3H10T1/2 murine fibroblast cells through activation of nuclear factor kappaB. J Nutr. 134:2948–2952. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

90 

Cohen-Lahav M, Shany S, Tobvin D, Chaimovitz C and Douvdevani A: Vitamin D decreases NFkappaB activity by increasing IkappaBalpha levels. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 21:889–897. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

91 

Williams JD, Aggarwal A, Swami S, Krishnan AV, Ji L, Albertelli MA and Feldman BJ: Tumor autonomous effects of Vitamin D deficiency promote breast cancer metastasis. Endocrinology. 157:1341–1347. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

92 

Aslakson CJ and Miller FR: Selective events in the metastatic process defined by analysis of the sequential dissemination of subpopulations of a mouse mammary tumor. Cancer Res. 52:1399–1405. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

93 

Simões RV, Serganova IS, Kruchevsky N, Leftin A, Shestov AA, Thaler HT, Sukenick G, Locasale JW, Blasberg RG, Koutcher JA, et al: Metabolic plasticity of metastatic breast cancer cells: Adaptation to changes in the microenvironment. Neoplasia. 17:671–684. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

94 

Meyer MB, Benkusky NA, Kaufmann M, Lee SM, Onal M, Jones G and Pike JW: A Kidney-specific genetic control module in mice governs endocrine regulation of the cytochrome P450 gene Cyp27b1 essential for vitamin D 3 activation. J Biol Chem. 2017 Aug 14–2017.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Anderson PH: Vitamin D activity and metabolism in bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 15:443–449. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

96 

Marik R, Fackler M, Gabrielson E, Zeiger MA, Sukumar S, Stearns V and Umbricht CB: DNA methylation-related vitamin D receptor insensitivity in breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 10:44–53. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

97 

Banwell CM, O'Neill LP, Uskokovic MR and Campbell MJ: Targeting 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 antiproliferative insensitivity in breast cancer cells by co-treatment with histone deacetylation inhibitors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 89–90:245–249. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

98 

Khanim FL, Gommersall LM, Wood VHJ, Smith KL, Montalvo L, O'Neill LP, Xu Y, Peehl DM, Stewart PM, Turner BM, et al: Altered SMRT levels disrupt vitamin D3 receptor signalling in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 23:6712–6725. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

99 

Zhi H-Y, Hou S-W, Li R-S, Basir Z, Xiang Q, Szabo A and Chen G: PTPH1 cooperates with vitamin D receptor to stimulate breast cancer growth through their mutual stabilization. Oncogene. 30:1706–1715. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :

100 

Krishnan AV, Swami S and Feldman D: Equivalent anticancer activities of dietary vitamin D and calcitriol in an animal model of breast cancer: Importance of mammary CYP27B1 for treatment and prevention. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 136:289–295. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

101 

Swami S, Krishnan AV, Wang JY, Jensen K, Horst R, Albertelli MA and Feldman D: Dietary vitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) exhibit equivalent anticancer activity in mouse xenograft models of breast and prostate cancer. Endocrinology. 153:2576–2587. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

102 

Jeong Y, Swami S, Krishnan AV, Williams JD, Martin S, Horst RL, Albertelli MA, Feldman BJ, Feldman D and Diehn M: Inhibition of mouse breast tumor-initiating cells by calcitriol and dietary vitamin D. Mol Cancer Ther. 14:1951–1961. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

103 

Rossdeutscher L, Li J, Luco A-L, Fadhil I, Ochietti B, Camirand A, Huang DC, Reinhardt TA, Muller W and Kremer R: Chemoprevention activity of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the MMTV-PYMT mouse model of breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 8:120–128. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

104 

Ooi LL, Zhou H, Kalak R, Zheng Y, Conigrave AD, Seibel MJ and Dunstan CR: Vitamin D deficiency promotes human breast cancer growth in a murine model of bone metastasis. Cancer Res. 70:1835–1844. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2018
Volume 52 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

2016 Impact Factor: 3.079
Ranked #33/217 Oncology
(total number of cites)

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Anisiewicz, A., Pawlik, A., Filip-Psurska, B., Turlej, E., Dzimira, S., Milczarek, M. ... Wietrzyk, J. (2018). Unfavorable effect of calcitriol and its low-calcemic analogs on metastasis of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer. International Journal of Oncology, 52, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4185
MLA
Anisiewicz, A., Pawlik, A., Filip-Psurska, B., Turlej, E., Dzimira, S., Milczarek, M., Gdesz, K., Papiernik, D., Jarosz, J., Kłopotowska, D., Kutner, A., Mazur, A., Wietrzyk, J."Unfavorable effect of calcitriol and its low-calcemic analogs on metastasis of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer". International Journal of Oncology 52.1 (2018): 103-126.
Chicago
Anisiewicz, A., Pawlik, A., Filip-Psurska, B., Turlej, E., Dzimira, S., Milczarek, M., Gdesz, K., Papiernik, D., Jarosz, J., Kłopotowska, D., Kutner, A., Mazur, A., Wietrzyk, J."Unfavorable effect of calcitriol and its low-calcemic analogs on metastasis of 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer". International Journal of Oncology 52, no. 1 (2018): 103-126. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4185