Open Access

PRL‑3 increases the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer cells in vitro and its expression correlates with high-grade prostate tumors in patients

  • Authors:
    • Donna R. Edwards
    • Krzysztof Moroz
    • Haitao Zhang
    • David Mulholland
    • Asim B. Abdel-Mageed
    • Debasis Mondal
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 20, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4208
  • Pages: 402-412
  • Copyright: © Edwards et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The increased expression of phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL‑3) has been shown to be associated with the aggressive and metastatic phenotype of different solid tumors. However, it is not known whether PRL‑3 plays a similar role in the progression of prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, immunoblot analysis of androgen receptor (AR)-positive PCa lines (LNCaP and LNCaP‑SF) revealed the constitutive cytoplasmic expression of PRL‑3, and stimulation with R1881 (AR agonist) rapidly increased the nuclear translocation of PRL‑3. The AR-negative cell lines exhibited negligible PRL‑3 expression, and the ectopic overexpression of PRL‑3 increased both the proliferative and invasive potential of PC3 and DU145 cells. In addition, we measured PRL‑3 protein expression in human prostate tumor sections. A high-density prostate tumor microarray (TMA) was immunostained to assess whether PRL‑3 expression and its subcellular localization (cytoplasmic and nuclear levels) is associated with the Gleason score (GS), Gleason grade (GG) and tumor stage (T-stage). Digital image analysis (DIA) revealed that PRL‑3 expression was significantly higher in the malignant cores, as compared to the non‑malignant areas. Increases in both total and nuclear PRL‑3 levels were also associated with a higher GS and GG. Metastatic tumors (T4‑stage) had lower cytoplasmic, but higher nuclear PRL‑3 levels. Furthermore, the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio for PRL‑3 in the tumors graded as GS7 could effectively distinguish between indolent (3+4) and aggressive (4+3) disease. Thus, our experiments using PCa lines suggested that PRL‑3 is an AR-regulated gene and its androgen-induced nuclear localization may increase the aggressive behavior of PCa cells. Furthermore, the digital analysis of immunostained tumor sections suggested that PRL‑3 may be an effective biomarker of high-grade PCa, and its nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio may be used to distinguish between indolent vs. aggressive tumors.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2018
Volume 52 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Edwards DR, Moroz K, Zhang H, Mulholland D, Abdel-Mageed AB and Mondal D: PRL‑3 increases the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer cells in vitro and its expression correlates with high-grade prostate tumors in patients. Int J Oncol 52: 402-412, 2018
APA
Edwards, D.R., Moroz, K., Zhang, H., Mulholland, D., Abdel-Mageed, A.B., & Mondal, D. (2018). PRL‑3 increases the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer cells in vitro and its expression correlates with high-grade prostate tumors in patients. International Journal of Oncology, 52, 402-412. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4208
MLA
Edwards, D. R., Moroz, K., Zhang, H., Mulholland, D., Abdel-Mageed, A. B., Mondal, D."PRL‑3 increases the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer cells in vitro and its expression correlates with high-grade prostate tumors in patients". International Journal of Oncology 52.2 (2018): 402-412.
Chicago
Edwards, D. R., Moroz, K., Zhang, H., Mulholland, D., Abdel-Mageed, A. B., Mondal, D."PRL‑3 increases the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer cells in vitro and its expression correlates with high-grade prostate tumors in patients". International Journal of Oncology 52, no. 2 (2018): 402-412. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4208