Open Access

Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Alessia Finotti
    • Matteo Allegretti
    • Jessica Gasparello
    • Patrizio Giacomini
    • Demetrios A. Spandidos
    • Giuseppe Spoto
    • Roberto Gambari
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 6, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4516
  • Pages: 1395-1434
  • Copyright: © Finotti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

In oncology, liquid biopsy is used in the detection of next-generation analytes, such as tumor cells, cell-free nucleic acids and exosomes in peripheral blood and other body fluids from cancer patients. It is considered one of the most advanced non-invasive diagnostic systems to enable clinically relevant actions and implement precision medicine. Medical actions include, but are not limited to, early diagnosis, staging, prognosis, anticipation (lead time) and the prediction of therapy responses, as well as follow-up. Historically, the applications of liquid biopsy in cancer have focused on circulating tumor cells (CTCs). More recently, this analysis has been extended to circulating free DNA (cfDNA) and microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) associated with cancer, with potential applications for development into multi-marker diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic signatures. Liquid biopsies avoid some key limitations of conventional tumor tissue biopsies, including invasive tumor sampling, under-representation of tumor heterogeneity and poor description of clonal evolution during metastatic dissemination, strongly reducing the need for multiple sampling. On the other hand, this approach suffers from important drawbacks, i.e., the fragmentation of cfDNA, the instability of RNA, the low concentrations of certain analytes in body fluids and the confounding presence of normal, as well as aberrant DNAs and RNAs. For these reasons, the analysis of cfDNA has been mostly focused on mutations arising in, and pathognomonicity of, tumor DNA, while the analysis of cfRNA has been mostly focused on miRNA patterns strongly associated with neoplastic transformation/progression. This review lists some major applicative areas, briefly addresses how technology is bypassing liquid biopsy limitations, and places a particular emphasis on novel, PCR-free platforms. The ongoing collaborative efforts of major international consortia are reviewed. In addition to basic and applied research, we will consider technological transfer, including patents, patent applications and available information on clinical trials aimed at verifying the potential of liquid biopsy in cancer.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2018
Volume 53 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Finotti A, Allegretti M, Gasparello J, Giacomini P, Spandidos DA, Spoto G and Gambari R: Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review). Int J Oncol 53: 1395-1434, 2018
APA
Finotti, A., Allegretti, M., Gasparello, J., Giacomini, P., Spandidos, D.A., Spoto, G., & Gambari, R. (2018). Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review). International Journal of Oncology, 53, 1395-1434. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4516
MLA
Finotti, A., Allegretti, M., Gasparello, J., Giacomini, P., Spandidos, D. A., Spoto, G., Gambari, R."Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review)". International Journal of Oncology 53.4 (2018): 1395-1434.
Chicago
Finotti, A., Allegretti, M., Gasparello, J., Giacomini, P., Spandidos, D. A., Spoto, G., Gambari, R."Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review)". International Journal of Oncology 53, no. 4 (2018): 1395-1434. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4516