Identification and association of RAC1 gene polymorphisms with mRNA and protein expression levels of Rac1 in solid organ (kidney, liver, heart) transplant recipients

  • Authors:
    • Jiali Zhou
    • Yani Liu
    • Xiaomei Luo
    • Rufei Shen
    • Chunxiao Yang
    • Tingyu Yang
    • Shaojun Shi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 9, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5383
  • Pages: 1379-1388
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The activation of Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) is critical in the renal, hepatic and cardiac diseases that lead to the requirement for transplantation, however, no investigations have been performed in Chinese populations to determine the association between RAC1 genotypes and the activation of Rac1. In the present study, 304 solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), consisting of 164 renal transplantations, 85 hepatic transplantations and 55 cardiac transplantations, and 332 Chinese healthy control subjects were recruited to investigate whether differences existed in the mRNA and protein expression levels of Rac1 in the different groups. Furthermore, the present study identified and investigated associations of the RAC1 (rs702482, rs10951982, rs702483 and rs6954996) genotypes with the mRNA expression levels of RAC1, and the protein expression levels of total Rac1 and active Rac1‑guanosine triphosphatase (GTP). It was identified that the healthy population had significantly higher levels of Rac1 and Rac1‑GTP, compared with the kidney, liver and heart transplantation populations (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Significant associations (P<0.05) were observed between the RAC1 genotypes and the expression levels of mRNA, Rac1 and Rac1‑GTP. However, the changes in the mRNA expression levels of RAC1 with genotypes were different from those of the proteins. The results of the present study represent the first, to the best of our knowledge, to report that Rac1 and Rac1‑GTP proteins can be downregulated in SOTRs, and that RAC1 genetic polymorphisms can potentially affect the mRNA expression of RAC1, and the protein expression of Rac1 and Rac1‑GTP. These results provide a foundation for further functional investigations to determine the biological and molecular functions of the RAC1 gene in SOTRs.

Introduction

The Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) protein, encoded by the RAC1 gene, is a 21 kDa member of the Rho family of small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), and can cycle between an inactive guanosine diphosphate-bound state and an active GTP-bound (Rac1-GTP) state under the regulation of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (1). In its active GTP-bound state, Rac1 binds specifically to the p21-binding domain of p21-activated protein kinase to control downstream signaling cascades (2,3). Rac1, as with other small GTPases, depends on the active GTP-bound state and is important in regulating several cellular processes, including cell-cell adhesion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (4), meiosis and mitosis (5), cell Ras-mediated transformation (6), spreading and membrane ruffling (7), B-cell development and signaling (8), cross-talk with oncogenes (9) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (10,11). In addition, Rac1 is known as a key regulator of a broad spectrum of transcription factors, including nuclear factor-κB, activating transcription factor 2, c-Jun and small mothers against decapentaplegic proteins (1214).

The human RAC1 gene is located on chromosome 7p22 and its structure has been described in full by Matos et al (15). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common form of genetic polymorphism and account for >90% of genetic variations (16). It is known that certain genetic variations can alter gene transcription and mRNA expression, which may transform the activity of proteins. The majority of these proteins are enzymes involved in several pathways and can alter susceptibility to diseases and drugs (6,1719). There are 2,061 SNPs in the human RAC1 gene, which have been found and named in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp). It has been reported that the RAC1 gene SNP, rs10951982 (G/A), is significantly associated with ulcerative colitis (17), and a previous study revealed that rs836478 (C/T) and rs10951982 (G/A) SNPs in the RAC1 gene are associated with higher levels of biomarkers, including interleukin 6, metalloproteinase-9 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, which may be connected with the development and progression of hypertension (18). It has also been suggested that polymorphisms of the RAC1 gene represent a possible additional mechanism contributing to inter-individual differences in the therapeutic effect of thiopurine drugs (19), which are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (20), or as immunosuppressive agents in organ transplantation (21). RAC1 genetic polymorphisms have been reported to be involved in the development of IBDs, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (17,22).

Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that several diseases in the kidney, liver and heart are associated with levels of Rac1 (2327). In the kidney, it has been reported that Rac1 activation is associated with podocyte foot process effacement, leading to an increase in glomerular permeability and proteinuria (23,24). The increased expression of Rac1-GTP has been shown in the glomeruli of rats with podocyte-specific overexpression of angiotensin II type I receptor, a model of effaced foot processes, podocyte depletion and focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) (28,29). In the liver, it has been found that a reduction in Rac1 activation reduced diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced formation of liver tumors, and that Rac1 can affect the basal and DEN-induced expression of metabolic liver enzymes (27). In the heart, it has been reported that Rac1 may be associated with the development of cardiovascular damage and salt-sensitive hypertension, which may be due to a crosstalk effect between Rac1 and mineralocorticoid receptor activation independent of aldosterone (1831). Therefore, patients with kidney, liver or heart transplantats were included in the present study as case groups. It is reasonable to suggest that polymorphisms of the RAC1 gene may be implicated in organ transplantation treated with thiopurine drugs, including azathioprine, 6-thioguanine and 6-mercaptopurine. However, the associations of RAC1 gene polymorphisms with the mRNA expression of RAC1, and the protein expression levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP have not been investigated. In addition, no investigations have been performed to compare patients treated with kidney, liver or heart transplantation and healthy populations to examine differences in RAC1 genotyping and the expression levels of RAC1 mRNA and the Rac1 protein it encodese in the population groups.

In our previously reported studies (32,33), eight SNPs in the human RAC1 gene were examined, and no significant differences in genotype or allele frequencies were found between healthy controls and renal transplant patients. Furthermore, four tag-SNPs (rs702482, rs10951982, rs702483, and rs6954996) were identified in the previous studies. In the present study, healthy control subjects and patients with kidney, liver or heart transplantation were recruited, and the genotyping and identification of four tag-SNPs (rs702482, rs10951982, rs702483, and rs6954996) in the RAC1 gene were performed. In addition, the expression levels of mRNA, and the protein levels of the total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP encoded by the RAC1 gene, were investigated in all the recruited subjects.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether differences exist in the mRNA expression levels of RAC1, and in the expression of proteins encoded by the RAC1 gene in the different population subgroups. Particular emphasis was focussed on the associations between the RAC1 genotypes and the expression levels of the mRNA and proteins of Rac1.

Materials and methods

Subjects

A total of 304 solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), consisting of 164 kidney transplantations, 85 liver transplantations and 55 heart transplantations, who were receiving azathioprine and cyclosporine immunosuppressant treatment, were recruited between March and May 2014 from the Department of Organ Transplantation Center of Union Hospital and Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China). All donor organs (kidney, liver and heart) were retrieved from the Accident and Emergency Department and intensive care units of the Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) and Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China). Donor eligibility screening and assessment did not reveal any contraindications to transplantation, and the patient's family agreed to organ donation. In addition, a total of 332 ethnically and geographically matched healthy Chinese Han subjects were enrolled at Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) during the same period of time. All subjects enrolled in the present study met the following criteria: i) Body mass index between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2; ii) age range between 20 and 60 years; iii) subjects in good health, as determined by complete physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiograms, chest X-ray, routine laboratory assessments, including routine hematology, blood chemistry and urine analyses, and negative pregnancy test results. In the SOTRs, the clinical data regarding the dose and duration of immunosuppressant administration, adverse drug reactions and laboratory data were assessed by screening of the patients' medical records. The study protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Wuhan, China; approval no. (2012)S019]. All associated procedures were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects were informed of the investigational nature of the study and signed informed consent prior to any screening procedure.

RNA and DNA extraction

Blood samples (~2 ml) were collected from the forearm vein into EDTA-treated Vacutainer tubes. Then 250 µl EDTA-treated blood was transferred into a clean tube and mixed with 750 µl TRIzol for the RNA extraction. The remaining blood sample was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to separate plasma and white blood cells for the measurement of Rac1 and Rac1-GTP levels and DNA extraction, respectively. Total RNA extraction and isolation from the TRIzol-treated whole blood samples were performed, according to standard procedures. The genomic DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNA and DNA were quantified using a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). The extracted total RNA and genomic DNA samples were stored at −80°C until processing for further analysis.

Genotyping and sequencing

Genotyping was performed using a total volume of 10 µl, containing 5 µl TaqMan® Genotyping Master Mix (Life Technologies Grand Island, NY, USA), 1 µl TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assay (Life Technologies), 2 µl extracted genomic DNA and 2 µl deionized water. The sequences of the primers for the four tag-SNPs are presented in Table I.

Table I

Primer sequences for genotyping Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 SNPs.

Table I

Primer sequences for genotyping Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 SNPs.

dbSNP IDMutationAreaLocationPrimer
rs702482T>AIntron 1Chr7.6420199F: 5′-AAAAGTTTGGAGTTGGGCTAAGT-3′
R: 5′-AGACATGATAAAGCAAATACAGCAA-3′
rs10951982G>AIntron 1Chr7.6422556F: 5′-ATGGCAAAACCCTGTCTCTACTG-3′
R: 5-GAAACGAACATGAGTCGGCTG-3′
rs702483G>AIntron 2Chr7.6426941F: 5′-TCCTGGAGAATATATCCCTACTGTG-3′
R:5′-GCCTCAGTCTCCCAAAGTGC-3′
rs6954996G>AIntron 4Chr7.6441258F: 5′-CAGTGGAGATAATAGCGGCAGAC-3′
R:5′-TCCTTCACCTAAATCACACCCAG-3′

[i] SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; F, forward; R, reverse.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycling conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 30 sec and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. The amplifications were performed using a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Data acquisition and analyses were performed using SDS v2.3 Allelic Discrimination software (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Direct sequencing was performed to confirm the genotyping accuracy. In total, five cases of each genotype were detected using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit and an ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and cDNA sequencing

Total RNA was transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer's protocol. RT-qPCR analyses were performed in triplicate, using β-actin for normalization. SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus; Takara Bio, Inc.) was for the amplification of cDNA. The sequences of the primers used for RT-qPCR were designed and synthesized by Takara Bio., Inc., as follows: β-actin, forward 5′-TGGCACCCAGCACAATGAA-3′ and reverse 5′-CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA-3′; RAC1, forward 5′-GCGTTGCCATTGAACTCACC-3′ and reverse 5′-GAGCTGCTACGCTCACTCCATTAC-3′. qPCR for RNA expression was performed on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using a total volume of 10 µl, containing 5 µl SYBRR Premix Ex Taq™ (2X; Takara Bio, Inc.), 0.2 µl ROX reference dye (50X; Takara Bio., Inc.), 3.4 µl sterile water (Takara Bio., Inc.), 0.2 µl forward primer, 0.2 µl reverse primer and 1 µl cDNA. The RT-qPCR conditions comprised a holding stage (95°C for 30 sec), cycling stage (95°C for 5 sec and 40 cycles at 60°C for 30 sec) and melt curve stage (95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min and 95°C for 15 sec). The amplifications were performed using the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The protein levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP were evaluated in the serum samples from all participants using the Rac1/Rac1-GTP ELISA kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. According to the results of the preliminary experiment, 10X dilutions of the serum samples were used for the assaying of Rac1, and 5X dilutions of the serum samples were used for the assaying of Rac1-GTP. The assays of the protein levels of Rac1 and Rac1-GTP were performed in triplicate, and a separate standard curve was established for each assessment on different days or using ELISA kits with different batch numbers.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference for all analyses. The allele and genotype frequencies were calculated by direct counting and were assessed tested for significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using a goodness-of-fit χ2 test. Linkage disequilibrium analysis between the different pairs of SNPs was performed using the Haploview version 4.2 software package (Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA). Skewed data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of log-transformed values in text and box-and-whisker plots in figures. The distributions of characteristics between cases and controls were evaluated using a χ2 test for categorical variables or using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post-hoc test for continuous variables. To analyze the effects of the four specific tag-SNPs on the formation and development of kidney, liver or heart failure, risk analysis modelling was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Demographic characteristics and laboratory results

The demographic characteristics of the subjects involved in the present study are summarized in Table II. The characteristics of the patients were based on data collected retrospectively from medical records. No significant differences in age stratification or gender ratio were found in either group (P>0.05).

Table II

Demographic characteristics and laboratory findings.

Table II

Demographic characteristics and laboratory findings.

CharacteristicCases
Healthy control
(n=332)
P-value
Renal transplantation
(n=164)
Liver transplantation
(n=85)
Heart transplantation
(n=55)
Age (years, mean ± SD)43.1±11.245.0±12.043.0±12.045.0±12.30.782a
Gender0.898b
 Male; n (%)104 (63.41)55 (64.71)34 (61.82)211 (63.55)
 Female; n (%)60 (36.59)30 (35.29)21 (38.18)121 (36.45)
rs702482; n (%)0.181c
 A143 (43.60)71 (41.76)36 (32.73)290 (43.67)
 T185 (56.40)99 (58.24)74 (67.27)374 (56.33)
 AA40 (24.39)16 (18.82)3 (5.45)77 (23.19)0.082d
 AT63 (38.41)39 (45.88)30 (54.55)136 (40.96)
 TT61 (37.20)30 (35.29)22 (40.00)119 (35.84)
rs10951982; n (%)0.079c
 A80 (24.39)54 (31.76)20 (18.18)168 (25.30)
 G248 (75.61)116 (68.24)90 (81.82)496 (74.70)
 AA17 (10.37)17 (20.00)3 (5.45)44 (13.25)0.218d
 AG46 (28.05)20 (23.53)14 (25.45)80 (24.10)
 GG101 (61.58)48 (56.47)38 (69.09)208 (62.65)
rs702483; n (%)0.250c
 A279 (85.06)151 (88.82)89 (80.91)554 (83.43)
 G49 (14.94)19 (11.18)21 (19.09)110 (16.57)
 GG4 (2.44)2 (2.35)2 (3.64)17 (5.12)0.374d
 AG41 (25.00)15 (17.65)17 (30.91)76 (22.89)
 AA119 (72.56)68 (80.00)36 (65.45)239 (71.99)
rs6954996; n (%)0.772c
 A49 (14.94)24 (14.12)20 (18.18)108 (16.27)
 G279 (85.06)146 (85.88)90 (81.82)556 (83.73)
 AA5 (3.05)4 (4.71)3 (5.45)17 (5.12)0.894d
 AG39 (23.78)16 (18.82)14 (25.45)74 (22.29)
 GG120 (73.17)65 (76.47)38 (69.09)241 (72.59)

a Differences in age distribution, determined by χ2.

b Gender differences determined by χ2.

c Differences in allele distribution, determined by χ2.

d Differences in genotype distribution, determined by χ2.

Genotyping and identification of RAC1 gene polymorphisms

The four tag-SNPs in RAC1 gene were successfully genotyped using TaqMan technology. No pairwise linkage disequilibrium was found in the four tag-SNPs (r2<0.3). The allele and genotype frequencies were calculated by direct counting and goodness-of-fit χ2 tests, the results of which showed that there were no significant differences in any of the SNPs among the transplant and control groups (P>0.05; Table II).

For the analysis of individual SNPs, dominant model (heterozygotes plus minor allele homozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes), recessive model (minor allele homo-zygotes vs. major allele homozygotes plus heterozygotes) and over-dominant model (minor allele homozygotes plus major allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes) were used in the present study (Table III). No significant differences in the genotype or allele frequencies of rs10951982, rs702483 and rs6954996 were observed between the transplant cases and healthy control (P>0.05). However, TT+AT in rs702482 was distributed differentially (OR=5.234; 95%CI=1.590–17.228; P=0.003), compared with AA in rs702482 between the heart transplantation cases and the healthy control.

Table III

Genotype distribution of the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 gene in transplantation cases and healthy controls.

Table III

Genotype distribution of the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 gene in transplantation cases and healthy controls.

SNPRenal transplantation, vs. healthy control
Liver transplantation, vs. healthy control
Heart transplantation, vs. healthy control
P-valueOR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)
rs702482
 TT+AT, vs. AA0.7680.936 (0.604, 1.451)0.3881.302 (0.714, 2.374)0.0035.234 (1.590, 17.228)
 TT, vs. AA+AT0.7681.060 (0.719, 1.563)0.9250.976 (0.593, 1.607)0.5531.193 (0.665, 2.140)
 AA+TT, vs. AT0.5861.112 (0.758, 1.632)0.4120.818 (0.507, 1.322)0.0590.578 (0.326, 1.027)
rs10951982
 AA+AG, vs. GG0.8181.046 (0.712, 1.538)0.2961.293 (0.798, 2.096)0.3580.750 (0.406, 1.386)
 AA, vs. GG+AG0.3570.757 (0.418, 1.371)0.1161.636 (0.881, 3.039)0.1010.378 (0.113, 1.262)
 AA+GG, vs. AG0.3410.814 (0.533, 1.244)0.9131.032 (0.589, 1.808)0.8280.930 (0.482, 1.793)
rs702483
 GG+AG, vs. AA0.8930.972 (0.640, 1.477)0.1350.642 (0.359, 1.151)0.3221.356 (0.741, 2.484)
 GG, vs. AA+AG0.1630.463 (0.153, 1.400)0.2750.446 (0.101, 1.971)0.6370.699 (0.157, 3.114)
 GG+AA, vs. AG0.6030.891 (0.576, 1.378)0.2961.385 (0.750, 2.559)0.1970.664 (0.355, 1.242)
rs6954996
 AA+AG, vs. GG0.8910.971 (0.637, 1.480)0.4700.815 (0.467, 1.421)0.5921.185 (0.637, 2.204)
 AA, vs. GG+AG0.2920.583 (0.211, 1.608)0.8760.915 (0.300, 2.794)0.9141.072 (0.304, 3.788)
 AA+GG, vs. AG0.7090.919 (0.590, 1.431)0.4881.237 (0.677, 2.259)0.6040.840 (0.434, 1.624)

[i] SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Relative quantification of mRNA levels

In order to investigate differences in the mRNA expression levels of RAC1 between the transplantation cases and healthy controls, the present study performed RT-qPCR analyses to measure the mRNA expression levels in all the recruited subjects. The RAC1 gene and the reference gene, β-actin, were all amplified fully and successfully under the final RT-qPCR reaction systems and conditions. The relative mRNA levels of RAC1 among groups were compared by one-way ANOVA following log-transformation, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test, however, no significant differences were found (P>0.05; Fig. 1A).

Expression levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP

The protein levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP among the groups were compared using one-way ANOVA following log-transformation, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. As shown in Fig. 1B and C, the highest levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP were found in the healthy control group (2.54±0.20 and 2.31±0.20 ng/l, respectively), compared with those in the kidney transplant group (2.32±0.13 and 2.02±0.19 ng/l, respectively), liver transplant group (2.34±0.08 and 2.05±0.10 ng/l, respectively) and heart transplant group (−2.42±0.20 and 2.10±0.15 ng/l, respectively; P<0.001 for all comparisons). However, no significant differences (P>0.05) were found when the levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP were compared among the three transplant groups.

Association between RAC1 genotypes and mRNA levels

The present study also investigated the association between the RAC1 genotype and relative mRNA levels in the examined populations, and significant differences were noted, as shown in Fig. 2. Significant associations (P<0.05) were observed between the rs702482, rs702483 and rs6954996 genotypes and the relative quantification levels of mRNA in the healthy control group. For rs702482, the relative mRNA levels were lowest in the TT genotype (−2.12±0.47; mean ± standard deviation), compared with the AA genotype (−1.93±0.57) and AT genotype (−1.94±0.55), respectively (P<0.01). For rs702483, the relative mRNA levels were lowest in the GG genotype (−2.35±0.24), compared with the AA genotype (−2.00±0.53) and AG genotype (−1.98±0.55), respectively (P<0.01). For rs6954996, the relative mRNA levels were highest in the GG genotype (−1.97±0.55), compared with the AG genotype (−2.10±0.46) and AA genotype (−2.26±0.41), respectively (P<0.05). In the kidney transplant group the mRNA level was highest in the AA genotype (−1.65±0.69), compared with the AG genotype (−1.99±0.51; P<0.05) and GG genotype (−2.04±0.44, P<0.01) of rs10951982, respectively. In the liver transplant group, the mRNA level was highest in the AA genotype (−1.58±0.61), compared with the AG genotype (−2.02±0.39) and GG genotype (−1.93±0.42) of rs10951982 (P<0.05), respectively. Additionally, in the heart transplant group, the mRNA level was highest in GG genotype (−1.53±0.73), compared with the AG genotype (−2.09±0.38; P<0.05) and AA genotype (−2.16±0.33; P<0.01) of rs702483, respectively.

Association between the RAC1 genotype and the levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP

The present study examined the association between the RAC1 genotype and the levels of total Rac1 in the study populations, which are listed in Fig. 3. Significant associations were found in rs702483 in the healthy control group, in which the level of total Rac1 was highest in the GG genotype (2.70±0.25 ng/l), compared with the AG genotype (2.56±0.21 ng/l) and AA genotype (2.53±0.19 ng/l), respectively (P<0.01). In rs6954996, the level of total Rac1 was highest in the AA genotype (2.68±0.17 ng/l), compared with the AG (2.52±0.21 ng/l) and GG genotype (2.54±0.19 ng/l), respectively (P<0.01). In the kidney transplant group, a significant difference was also apparent in rs702482, in which the level of total Rac1 was lowest in the AA genotype (2.28±0.12 ng/l), compared with the AT genotype (2.35±0.13 ng/l) and TT genotype (2.33±0.13 ng/l), respectively (P<0.05).

The association between the RAC1 genotype and the levels of Rac1-GTP in the study populations are listed in Fig. 4. As with the levels of total Rac1, significant associations were found in the healthy control group in rs702482, in which the level of Rac1-GTP was highest in the AT genotype (2.36±0.22 ng/l), compared with the AA genotype (2.29±0.18 ng/l) and TT genotype (2.28±0.20 ng/l), respectively (P<0.05). In rs10951982, the level of Rac1-GTP was lowest in the AA genotype (2.23±0.16 ng/l), compared with the AG genotype (2.33±0.23 ng/l) and GG genotype (2.32±0.20 ng/l), respectively (P<0.05).

Discussion

The present study was the first, to the best of our knowledge, to investigate and compare the mRNA expression levels of RAC1, and the protein levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP in SOTRs and Chinese healthy subjects, and to determine the associations between RAC1 gene polymorphisms and the expression levels of RAC1, Rac1 and Rac1-GTP.

The results of the present study, which consisted of 304 SOTRs comprising 164 kidney transplantations, 85 liver transplantations and 55 heart transplantations, and 332 healthy Hubei Chinese control subjects, demonstrated that the healthy population had higher levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP, compared with the kidney, liver and heart transplant cases (P<0.001). It has been suggested that alterations of the RAC1 gene, through impairment of its activity, may affect susceptibility to diseases, including renal failure, cardiac failure and hypertension (34). It is known that activated Rac1 can increase cell proliferation and differentiation, and inhibiting cell apoptosis at the same time (411). It has been reported that ~20% of tumors grow in Rac1-proficient mice, exhibiting overexpression of Rac1 in tumor tissue, compared with the surrounding normal tissue (27), which is in accordance with reports showing overexpression of Rac1 protein in different types of human tumor (35,36). As Rac1-GTP protein is the active form of Rac1, increased expression of Rac1-GTP has been shown in the glomeruli of rats with podocyte-specific overexpression of the AT1 receptor, a model of effaced foot processes, podocyte depletion and FSGS (28,29). Decreased expression of Rac1-GTP reduces the DEN-induced formation of liver tumors and affects the basal and DEN-induced expression of metabolic liver enzymes (27).

Extensive investigations have been performed to examine changes in the immune response gene expression profile in allograft recipients. It has been reported that these genes, involved in variant recognition, antigen-presenting synthesis, signal transduction, and the regulation of protein transcription and translation are downregulated following transplantation, including protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1 (PTP4A1) (37) and potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 3 (KCNQ3) (38). As with other downregulated genes, the RAC1 gene is also involved in anti-apoptosis, signal transduction, and the regulation of cell cycle and proliferation. The present study demonstrated that the RAC1 gene was downregulated following organ transplantation, as observed for the PTP4A1 and KCNQ3 genes. The changes in the immune response gene expression profile in allograft recipients are not only due to regulations of autoimmunity, but also occur in the use of exogenous immune inhibitors. Studies have shown that azathioprine exerts its immunosuppressive activity via the inhibition of Vav-mediated Rac1 activation, and consecutively suppresses the functions of Rac1 on T cell survival and T-cell-antigen-presenting cell conjugation (39,40).

The present study further analyzed the expression levels of RAC1 mRNA and its protein in different genotypes. For rs702482 in the healthy control group, the mRNA expression levels were lowest in the TT genotype (−2.12±0.47), compared with AA (−1.93±0.57) and AT (−1.94±0.55), respectively (P<0.01), whereas the level of Rac1−GTP was highest in the AT genotype (2.36±0.22 ng/l), compared with the AA (2.29±0.18 ng/l) and TT genotypes (2.28±0.20 ng/l) respectively (P<0.05). For rs702483 in the healthy control group, the relative level of mRNA was lowest in the GG genotype (−2.35±0.24), compared with the AA (−2.00±0.53) and AG genotypes (−1.98±0.55), respectively (P<0.01), whereas the level of total Rac1 was highest in the GG genotype (2.70±0.25 ng/l), compared with the AG (2.56±0.21 ng/l) and AA genotypes (2.53±0.19 ng/l), respectively (P<0.01). For rs6954996 in the healthy control group, the relative level of mRNA was highest in the GG genotype (−1.97±0.55), compared with the AG (−2.10±0.46) and AA genotype (−2.26±0.41), respectively (P<0.05), whereas the level of total Rac1 was highest in the AA genotype (2.68±0.17 ng/l), compared with the AG (2.52±0.21 ng/l) and GG genotypes (2.54±0.19 ng/l), respectively, (P<0.01). The differences in the relative mRNA levels of RAC1 in the genotypes were different from those of the proteins. It was difficult to determine the association between the mRNA levels of RAC1 and its protein. This may due to the complex regulatory mechanism of protein expression. In addition to mRNA, several factors can affect protein expression and activity, including ROS (41), shear stress (42), mechanical stretch (43), integrins (44), inflammatory cytokines (45), growth factors (46), homocysteine (47), high glucose concentrations (48,49), NaCl or osmotic stress (5053), aldosterone (10,54) and angiotensin II (5557).

In conclusion, the present study constitutes the first, to the best of our knowledge, to report that the expression levels of total Rac1 and Rac1-GTP were downregulated in SOTRs, and that the RAC1 genetic polymorphisms potentially affects the expression levels of RAC1 mRNA, and Rac1 and Rac1-GTP proteins. However, it is difficult to conclude the exact contribution of RAC1 polymorphisms to the protein levels of Rac1 and Rac1-GTP due to the selection of SNPs and the limited number of subjects. Further gene functional investigations are urgently required to confirm and clarify these preliminary data. The present analyses provide a foundation for further functional investigations to reveal the biological and molecular functions of the RAC1 gene in solid organ transplantation.

Abbreviations:

SOTRs

solid organ transplant recipients

Rac1

Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1

Rac1-GTP

active guanosine triphosphatase-bound Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1

GTPases

guanosine triphosphatases

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

DEN

diethylnitrosamine

OR

odds ratio

CI

confidence interval

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81273591) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (China; grant no. 2014YGYL003). The funding bodies had no involvement in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1 

Rossman KL, Der CJ and Sondek J: GEF means go: Turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 6:167–180. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Park EJ, Ji KA, Jeon SB, Choi WH, Han IO, You HJ, Kim JH, Jou I and Joe EH: Rac1 contributes to maximal activation of STAT1 and STAT3 in IFN-gamma-stimulated rat astrocytes. JImmunol. 173:5697–5703. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Hoppe AD and Swanson JA: Cdc42, Rac1 and Rac2 display distinct patterns of activation during phagocytosis. Mol Biol Cell. 15:3509–3519. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Schmitz AA, Govek EE, Böttner B and Van Aelst L: Rho GTPases: Signaling, migration, and invasion. Exp Cell Res. 261:1–12. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Maroto B, Ye MB, von Lohneysen K, Schnelzer A and Knaus UG: P21-activated kinase is required for mitotic progression and regulates Plk1. Oncogene. 27:4900–4908. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Khosravi-Far R, Solski PA, Clark GJ, Kinch MS and Der CJ: Activation of Rac1, RhoA, and mitogen-activated protein kinases is required for Ras transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 15:6443–6453. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Wells CM, Walmsley M, Ooi S, Tybulewicz V and Ridley AJ: Rac1-deficient macrophages exhibit defects in cell spreading and membrane ruffling but not migration. J Cell Sci. 117:1259–1268. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Walmsley MJ, Ooi SK, Reynolds LF, Smith SH, Ruf S, Mathiot A, Vanes L, Williams DA, Cancro MP and Tybulewicz VL: Critical roles for Rac1 and Rac2 GTPases in B cell development and signaling. Science. 302:459–462. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Mizukawa B, Wei J, Shrestha M, Wunderlich M, Chou FS, Griesinger A, Harris CE, Kumar AR, Zheng Y, Williams DA and Mulloy JC: Inhibition of Rac GTPase signaling and downstream prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins as combination targeted therapy in MLL-AF9 leukemia. Blood. 118:5235–5245. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Iwashima F, Yoshimoto T, Minami I, Sakurada M, Hirono Y and Hirata Y: Aldosterone induces superoxide generation via Rac1 activation in endothelial cells. Endocrinology. 149:1009–1014. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Ma Q, Cavallin LE, Yan B, Zhu S, Duran EM, Wang H, Hale LP, Dong C, Cesarman E, Mesri EA and Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ: Antitumorigenesis of antioxidants in a transgenic Rac1 model of Kaposi's sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:8683–8688. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Canman CE and Kastan MB: Signal transduction. Three paths to stress relief. Nature. 384:213–214. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Jefferies CA and O'Neill LA: Rac1 regulates interleukin 1-induced nuclear factor kappaB activation in an inhibitory protein kappaBalpha-independent manner by enhancing the ability of the p65 subunit to transactivate gene expression. J Biol Chem. 275:3114–3120. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ungefroren H, Groth S, Sebens S, Lehnert H, Gieseler F and Fändrich F: Differential roles of Smad2 and Smad3 in the regulation of TGF-β1-mediated growth inhibition and cell migration in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells: Control by Rac1. Mol Cancer. 10:672011. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Matos P, Skaug J, Marques B, Beck S, Veríssimo F, Gespach C, Boavida MG, Scherer SW and Jordan P: Small GTPase Rac1: Structure, localization, and expression of the human gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 277:741–751. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Risch N and Merikangas KR: Linkage studies of psychiatric disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 243:143–149. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Muise AM, Walters T, Xu W, Shen-Tu G, Guo CH, Fattouh R, Lam GY, Wolters VM, Bennitz J, van Limbergen J, et al: Single nucleotide polymorphisms that increase expression of the guanosine triphosphatase RAC1 are associated with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 141:633–641. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tapia-Castillo A, Carvajal CA, Campino C, Vecchiola A, Allende F, Solari S, García L, Lavanderos S, Valdivia C, Fuentes C, et al: Polymorphisms in the RAC1 gene are associated with hypertension risk factors in a Chilean pediatric population. Am J Hypertens. 27:299–307. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Bourgine J, Garat A, Allorge D, Crunelle-Thibaut A, Lo-Guidice JM, Colombel JF, Broly F and Billaut-Laden I: Evidence for a functional genetic polymorphism of the Rho-GTPase Rac1. Implication in azathioprine response? Pharmacogene Genomics. 21:313–324. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Derijks LJ and Wong DR: Pharmacogenetics of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Pharm Des. 16:145–154. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Sahasranaman S, Howard D and Roy S: Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of thiopurines. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 64:753–767. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Taher M, Ebrahimi Daryani N, Hedayat M, Eslamian M, Farhadi E, Mahmoudi M, Shirzad S, Nouri Taromlou MK, Chaharmahali M, Nicknam MH, et al: RAC1 single nucleotide polymorphisms in Crohn's disease. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 38:e75–e77. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Mundel P and Reiser J: Proteinuria: An enzymatic disease of the podocyte? Kidney Int. 77:571–580. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Welsh GI and Saleem MA: The podocyte cytoskeleton-key to a functioning glomerulus in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 8:14–21. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Brown JH, Del Re DP and Sussman MA: The Rac and Rho hall of fame: A decade of hypertrophic signaling hits. Circ Res. 98:730–742. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Lezoualc'h F, Métrich M, Hmitou I, Duquesnes N and Morel E: Small GTP-binding proteins and their regulators in cardiac hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 44:623–632. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Bopp A, Wartlick F, Henninger C, Schwarz M, Kaina B and Fritz G: Rac1 promotes diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced formation of liver tumors. Carcinogenesis. 36:378–389. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Hoffmann S, Podlich D, Hähnel B, Kriz W and Gretz N: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor overexpression in podocytes induces glomerulosclerosis in transgenic rats. J Am Soc Nephrol. 15:1475–1487. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Hsu HH, Hoffmann S, Endlich N, Velic A, Schwab A, Weide T, Schlatter E and Pavenstädt H: Mechanisms of angiotensin II signaling on cytoskeleton of podocytes. J Mol Med (Berl). 86:1379–1394. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Nagase M: Role of Rac1 GTPase in salt-sensitive hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 22:148–155. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Shibata S, Mu S, Kawarazaki H, Muraoka K, Ishizawa K, Yoshida S, Kawarazaki W, Takeuchi M, Ayuzawa N, Miyoshi J, et al: Rac1 GTPase in rodent kidneys is essential for salt-sensitive hypertension via a mineralocorticoid receptor-dependent pathway. J Clin Invest. 121:3233–3243. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Liu YN, Zhou JL, Yang CX, Sheng RF, Luo XM, Zhang Yu and Shi SJ: Distribution of Rac1 gene polymorphism in Hubei Hans renal transplant patients of China. Chin Pharm J. 49:1923–1927. 2014.

33 

Zhou JL, Liu YN, Sheng RF, Yang CX, Luo XM, Zhang Yu and Shi SJ: Analysis of RAC1 gene polymorphism in Hubei Chinese healthy population. Chin J Immunol. 30:1297–1301. 2014.

34 

Nagase M and Fujita T: Role of Rac1-mineralocorticoid-receptor signalling in renal and cardiac disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 9:86–98. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Schnelzer A, Prechtel D, Knaus U, Dehne K, Gerhard M, Graeff H, Harbeck N, Schmitt M and Lengyel E: Rac1 in human breast cancer: Overexpression, mutation analysis, and characterization of a new isoform, Rac1b. Oncogene. 19:3013–3020. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Fritz G, Just I and Kaina B: Rho GTPases are overexpressed in human tumors. Int J Cancer. 81:682–687. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Stegall MD, Park WD, Kim DY, Covarrubias M, Khair A and Kremers WK: Changes in intragraft gene expression secondary to ischemia reperfusion after cardiac transplantation. Transplantation. 74:924–930. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Shah K, Tom Blake J, Huang C, Fischer P and Koo GC: Immunosuppressive effects of a Kv1.3 inhibitor. Cell Immunol. 221:100–106. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Tiede I, Fritz G, Strand S, Poppe D, Dvorsky R, Strand D, Lehr HA, Wirtz S, Becker C, Atreya R, et al: CD28-dependent Rac1 activation is the molecular target of azathioprine in primary human CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 111:1133–1145. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Poppe D, Tiede I, Fritz G, Becker C, Bartsch B, Wirtz S, Strand D, Tanaka S, Galle PR, Bustelo XR and Neurath MF: Azathioprine suppresses ezrin-radixin-moesin-dependent T cell-APC conjugation through inhibition of Vav guanosine exchange activity on Rac proteins. J Immunol. 176:640–651. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Nagase M, Ayuzawa N, Kawarazaki W, Ishizawa K, Ueda K, Yoshida S and Fujita T: Oxidative stress causes mineralocorticoid receptor activation in rat cardiomyocytes: Role of small GTPase Rac1. Hypertension. 59:500–506. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Tzima E, Del Pozo MA, Kiosses WB, Mohamed SA, Li S, Chien S and Schwartz MA: Activation of Rac1 by shear stress in endothelial cells mediates both cytoskeletal reorganization and effects on gene expression. EMBO J. 21:6791–6800. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Aikawa R, Nagai T, Tanaka M, Zou Y, Ishihara T, Takano H, Hasegawa H, Akazawa H, Mizukami M, Nagai R and Komuro I: Reactive oxygen species in mechanical stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 289:901–907. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Price LS, Leng J, Schwartz MA and Bokoch GM: Activation of Rac and Cdc42 by integrins mediates cell spreading. Mol Biol Cell. 9:1863–1871. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Papaharalambus C, Sajjad W, Syed A, Zhang C, Bergo MO, Alexander RW and Ahmad M: Tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulation of Rac1 activity. Role of isoprenylcysteine carboxylmethyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 280:18790–18796. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Kurokawa K, Itoh RE, Yoshizaki H, Nakamura YO and Matsuda M: Coactivation of Rac1 and Cdc42 at lamellipodia and membrane ruffles induced by epidermal growth factor. Mol Biol Cell. 15:1003–1010. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar :

47 

Yi F, Zhang AY, Janscha JL, Li PL and Zou AP: Homocysteine activates NADH/NADPH oxidase through ceramide-stimulated Rac GTPase activity in rat mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 66:1977–1987. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Lin CL, Wang JY, Ko JY, Surendran K, Huang YT, Kuo YH and Wang FS: Superoxide destabilization of beta-catenin augments apoptosis of high-glucose-stressed mesangial cells. Endocrinology. 149:2934–2942. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Shen E, Li Y, Li Y, Shan L, Zhu H, Feng Q, Arnold JM and Peng T: Rac1 is required for cardiomyocyte apoptosis during hyperglycemia. Diabetes. 58:2386–2395. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Uhlik MT, Abell AN, Johnson NL, Sun W, Cuevas BD, Lobel-Rice KE, Horne EA, Dell'Acqua ML and Johnson GL: Rac-MEKK3-MKK3 scaffolding for p38 MAPK activation during hyperosmotic shock. Nat Cell Biol. 5:1104–1110. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Friis MB, Friborg CR, Schneider L, Nielsen MB, Lambert IH, Christensen ST and Hoffmann EK: Cell shrinkage as a signal to apoptosis in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. J Physiol. 567:427–443. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Silva GB and Garvin JL: Rac1 mediates NaCl-induced superoxide generation in the thick ascending limb. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 298:F421–F425. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar :

53 

Liu R and Juncos LA: GTPase-Rac enhances depolarization-induced superoxide production by the macula densa during tubuloglomerular feedback. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 298:R453–R458. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar :

54 

Shibata S, Nagase M, Yoshida S, Kawachi H and Fujita T: Podocyte as the target for aldosterone: Roles of oxidative stress and Sgk1. Hypertension. 49:355–364. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Schmitz U, Thömmes K, Beier I, Wagner W, Sachinidis A, Düsing R and Vetter H: Angiotensin II-induced stimulation of p21-activated kinase and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase is mediated by Rac1 and Nck. J Biol Chem. 276:22003–22010. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Takemoto M, Node K, Nakagami H, Liao Y, Grimm M, Takemoto Y, Kitakaze M and Liao JK: Statins as antioxidant therapy for preventing cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. J Clin Invest. 108:1429–1437. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Nishida M, Tanabe S, Maruyama Y, Mangmool S, Urayama K, Nagamatsu Y, Takagahara S, Turner JH, Kozasa T, Kobayashi H, et al: G alpha 12/13- and reactive oxygen species-dependent activation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase by angiotensin receptor stimulation in rat neonatal cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem. 280:18434–18441. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2016
Volume 14 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhou J, Liu Y, Luo X, Shen R, Yang C, Yang T and Shi S: Identification and association of RAC1 gene polymorphisms with mRNA and protein expression levels of Rac1 in solid organ (kidney, liver, heart) transplant recipients. Mol Med Rep 14: 1379-1388, 2016
APA
Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Luo, X., Shen, R., Yang, C., Yang, T., & Shi, S. (2016). Identification and association of RAC1 gene polymorphisms with mRNA and protein expression levels of Rac1 in solid organ (kidney, liver, heart) transplant recipients. Molecular Medicine Reports, 14, 1379-1388. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5383
MLA
Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Luo, X., Shen, R., Yang, C., Yang, T., Shi, S."Identification and association of RAC1 gene polymorphisms with mRNA and protein expression levels of Rac1 in solid organ (kidney, liver, heart) transplant recipients". Molecular Medicine Reports 14.2 (2016): 1379-1388.
Chicago
Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Luo, X., Shen, R., Yang, C., Yang, T., Shi, S."Identification and association of RAC1 gene polymorphisms with mRNA and protein expression levels of Rac1 in solid organ (kidney, liver, heart) transplant recipients". Molecular Medicine Reports 14, no. 2 (2016): 1379-1388. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5383