Correlation analysis between liver metastasis and serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 in patients with colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Meng Ding
    • Tao Zhang
    • Shijie Li
    • Ying Zhang
    • Yunfeng Qiu
    • Bin Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 20, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7538
  • Pages: 7791-7795
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Colorectal cancer has become a disease with one of the highest incidence rates worldwide, and liver metastasis threatens the prognosis of colorectal cancer. MicroRNA (miR)‑200 and miR‑141 have been confirmed to be aberrantly expressed in colorectal cancer, however, whether miR‑200 and miR‑141 are involved in the progression of colorectal cancer, and their role in liver metastasis remain to be fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of miR‑200 and miR‑141 in the progression and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer in patients. A total of 380 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled, of which 142 were diagnosed with grade I/II disease and 238 were grade III/IV disease. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed to examine the serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141. In addition, transfection was performed in HCT116 and SW480 cells to establish overexpression models for miR‑200 and miR‑141. A TUNEL assay was performed to assess apoptosis and a Transwell experiment was performed to examine cell migration. Compared with the control group, the serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 were significantly increased in the colorectal cancer group (P<0.05). Compared with the patients with colorectal cancer without liver metastasis, patients with liver metastasis had significantly higher serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 (P<0.05). The overexpression of miR‑200 and miR‑141 inhibited apoptosis of the HC116 and SW480 cells, and enhanced cell migration. The upregulation of serum miR‑200 and miR‑141 were associated with liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. Taken together, the overexpression of miR‑200 and miR‑141 exacerbated liver metastasis of colorectal cancer via inhibiting apoptosis and inducing migration.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer has become one of the malignant tumor diseases with the highest incidence rates worldwide. The liver is the main target organ for the hematogenous metastasis of colorectal cancer, and liver metastasis is the leading cause of colorectal cancer-associated mortality in patients (1). Clinical trials have shown that liver metastasis is an independent predictor of poor prognosis and increased risk of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer (2). There remains no effective therapy for liver metastasis despite promising developments achieved in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Early diagnosis and positive therapy may improve the survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer at an early stage of liver metastasis. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the molecular mechanisms of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer, and screen for biomarkers associated with liver metastasis. These investigations are likely to assist in improving the accuracy of early diagnosis, efficacy of novel therapy and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (3).

MicroRNAs are a type of non-coding RNA with a length of 21–23 bp (4). Previous studies have shown that microRNAs affect multiple cellular events via mRNA interference (5). The microRNA expression profile of colorectal cancer shows differential expression of microRNAs in colorectal cancer, compared with normal tissues, suggesting that the aberrant expression of microRNA is associated with the metabolism and cell behavior of cancer (6). Several microRNAs have been confirmed to be associated with the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer, including microRNA (miR)-31, miR-143 and miR-145 (7,8). Zhang et al (9) found that miR-200 was important in the regulatory mechanisms of liver cancer, and a previous study showed that serum levels of miR-200 and miR-141 were increased in patients with colorectal cancer (10). These findings suggest that miR-200 and miR-141 may be involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. However, whether the aberrant expression of miR-200 and miR-141 is associated with liver metastasis remains to be elucidated. The present study aimed to examine the association between liver metastasis and levels of serum miR-200 and miR-141 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Study subjects

A total of 380 patients with colorectal cancer were randomly enrolled into the experimental group at China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China) between June 2008 and June 2014 (male/female ratio, 218/162; age range, 42–73; 53.6±6.2 years). The patients with colorectal cancer were diagnosed by an alimentary tract barium meal, B-ultrasonic examination and histopathological analyses. Disease grading was performed for all enrolled patients according to the criteria of the World Health Organization grading standard for colorectal cancer (11). The grading comprised 142 grade I/II cases and 238 III/IV cases. None of the patients had received radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery prior to hospitalization. A control group included healthy adults, who were age- and sex-matched to patients in the experimental group. This clinical trial was performed following approval and under supervision of the Ethics Committee of the China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China). All participants signed informed consent prior to enrollment in the study.

Reagents and instruments

RNA extraction kits (cat. no 74104) were purchased from Qiagen, Inc. (Valencia, CA, USA). Routine kits for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis (cat. no. KR103-03) were purchased from TianGen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). MicroRNA qRT-PCR kits (cat. no. AM1558) were purchased from Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). Lipidosome INTERFERin™ transfection kits (cat. no. 410-015) were purchased from Polyplus Transfection (Illkirch, France). DMEM (cat. no. SH30081.01) was purchased from HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (Logan, UT, USA). TUNEL apoptosis detection kits were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). Transwell kits were purchased from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The Mx3000P fluorescence ration PCR instrument was purchased from Agilent Technologies, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cell incubator was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

Extraction of microRNA and RT-qPCR analysis

Fasting blood samples (10 ml) were collected into vacuum tubes with EDTA as an anticoagulant. Plasma was obtained via two-step centrifugation (2,000 g for 10 min; 8,000 g for 10 min at 25°C). The supernatant was recycled for the extraction of total RNA and microRNA, respectively. Primers were synthesized for miR-200 and miR-141 (Table I). RT-qPCR analysis was performed in a total volume of 20 µl, including 10 µl SYBR-Green qPCR Super mix, 0.5 µl forward primer (10 µM), 0.5 µl reverse primer (10 µM), 5 µl cDNA and 4 µl sterile water using routine protocols. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 3 min, 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 30 sec (40 cycles). Applied Biosystems 7500 software V2.02 (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used with the U6-RNA sequence as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to analyze data (12).

Table I.

Primer sequences of miR-200 and miR-141.

Table I.

Primer sequences of miR-200 and miR-141.

PrimerSequence
miR-200-F 5′-GGTTCTTCCCTGGGCTTC-3′
miR-200-R 5′-GAGTAGGAGCTCCGGATGTG-3′
miR-141-F 5′-CAAACAAAGCCTGGGAGAG-3′
miR-141-R 5′-TTAAGGCCCCAGATTCCAC-3′

[i] miR, microRNA; F, forward; R, reverse.

Transfection and overexpression of microRNA

The miR-200 mimic and miR-141 mimic were synthesized (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for transfection and overexpression. The medium comprised DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum, 5,000 units penicillin and 5,000 units streptomycin. The HCT116 and SW480 colon carcinoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were incubated separately in 96-well plates with cell culture conditions of 37°C and 5% CO2. Following culture for 24 h, lipidosome transfection was performed to establish HCT116 and SW480 cells overexpressing miR-200 or miR-141.

In situ detection of apoptosis using TUNEL staining

The transfected HCT116 and SW480 cells were transferred into 24-well plates following culture for 24 h. Untransfected HCT116 cells were used as a control group, and six parallel experiments were performed for each group. Staining for was performed for the detection of apoptosis at different time points (1, 2, 3 and 4 days) according to the manufacturer's protocol of the apoptosis detection kit (Roche Diagnostics). Subsequently, five clear visual fields were randomly selected under a light microscope to analyze the total cell count and apoptotic cell count. The apoptotic index was calculated as the ratio of apoptotic cells to total cells (13).

Examination of cell migration using a Transwell assay

Matrigel (60 µl; 5 mg/ml) was added into the upper Transwell chamber and air-dried at 4°C. The HCT116 and SW480 cells were cultured, respectively, until the logarithmic growth phase. The cells were digested and resuspended with a diluted cell density of 1×106, and 200 µl of the cell suspension was added into the upper Transwell chamber. In the lower Transwell chamber, 600 µl fresh nutrient medium was added. After 24 h, the Matrigel and HCT116 cells or SW480 cells were cleaned. Crystal violet staining (30 min) was performed for the cells in the lower Transwell chamber. The optical density at 570 nm was assessed via a microplate assay following rinsing in 10% acetic acid (14). The above process was repeated three times to produce steady results.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 21.0 software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data processing. Measurement data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Student's t-test was performed for comparison of difference between two groups. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way analysis of variance among multiple treatment groups. A χ2 test was performed for statistical analysis of enumeration data. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-200 and miR-141 are increased in colorectal cancer

Compared with the normal tissues from the control group, the colorectal cancer tissues had significantly higher mRNA levels of miR-200 and miR-141 (P<0.05; Fig. 1), which were measured using RT-qPCR analysis.

Increased expression of miR-200 and miR-141 are associated with liver metastasis

The follow-up data showed that 110 patients (28.9%) suffered from liver metastasis in the experimental group, whereas 32 patients (8.4%) suffered from metastasis in other organs (Table II). Serum levels of miR-200 and miR-141 were positively correlated with clinical grading. In the patients with liver metastasis, 78.2% had increased expression of miR-200, which was only observed in 20.4% of the patients without liver metastasis. The same was observed for the expression of miR-141, in that patients with liver metastasis had a higher level, compared with those without liver metastasis (81.8, vs. 22.0%, respectively).

Table II.

Analysis of the association between clinicopathological parameters and expression levels of miR-200 and miR-141.

Table II.

Analysis of the association between clinicopathological parameters and expression levels of miR-200 and miR-141.

Expression of miR-200Expression of miR-141


ParameterHigh (n)Low (n)P-valueHigh (n)Low (n)P-value
Age (years) >0.05 >0.05
  ≥60118103 121100
  <60  87  72   78  81
Sex >0.05 >0.05
  Male122  96 115103
  Female  91  71   89  73
Clinical grade <0.05 <0.05
  I+II  46  96   37105
  III+IV186  52 177  61
Liver metastasis <0.05 <0.05
  Yes  86  24   90  20
  No  55215   62208
Metastasis in other organs <0.05 <0.05
  Yes  23  9   21  11
  No  66282   60288

[i] miR, microRNA.

Transfection with miR-200 or miR-141

The overexpression of miR-200 or miR-141 in the HCT116 and SW480 cells was established using mimics. The transfected cells were cultured to the log phase, and total RNA was extracted for RT-qPCR analysis (Fig. 2). Compared with the negative groups, the transfected HCT116 and SW480 cells had significantly higher expression levels of miR-200 and miR-141 (P<0.05), suggesting transfection was successful.

miR-200 and miR-141 inhibit the apoptosis of HCT116 and SW480 cells

An apoptosis index-time curve is shown in Fig. 3. Compared with the control groups, the transfected HCT116 and SW480 cells had significantly lower apoptotic indices, suggesting that miR-200 and miR-141 inhibited apoptosis.

miR-200 and miR-141 enhance the migration of HCT116 and SW480 cells

Compared with the control groups, the migration of the miR-200-transfected HCT116 and SW480 cells significantly increased. Consistently, the migration of the miR-141-transfected cells was also significantly increased when compared with the blank control group (P<0.05; Fig. 4).

Discussion

Colorectal cancer is the most common type of malignant tumor of the digestive tract in clinical settings, and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer leads to a poorer prognosis (2). Several studies have shown that microRNA is tightly correlated with the development of tumors and survival rates of patients (6). The present study demonstrated that, compared with normal tissues, colorectal cancer tissues expressed significantly higher levels of miR-200 and miR-141. It was also found that miR-200 and miR-141 inhibited apoptosis and enhanced the migration of colorectal cancer cells, suggesting that miR-200 and miR-141 may accelerate liver metastasis in colorectal cancer.

The way in which the profile of microRNAs, including miR-200 and miR-141, is altered in colorectal cancer remains to be fully elucidated (14). Tamagawa et al (15) reported marked demethylation in CpG regions of the miR-200 and miR-141 promoters in cancer cells; this was confirmed by DNA methylation assays and suggested that cancer cells regulated the profile of microRNAs, particularly miR-200 and miR-141, via DNA methylation. In addition, proteins encoded by microRNA target genes can reversely regulate the profile of microRNAs (16,17). However, further investigations are required to explain how colorectal cancer affects the expression profile of microRNAs.

The migration and invasion of cancer cells are complex biological processes. Studies have shown that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is pivotal in the migration and invasion of cancer (18,19). Studies have confirmed that miR-200 and miR-141 regulate EMT via affecting the expression of E-cadherin, which is involved in EMT (20,21). When miR-200 and miR-141 are increased, transcription factors of E-cadherin are inhibited, including zinc finger E-box binding homeobox (ZEB)1 and ZEB2, leading to the downregulation of E-cadherin (20). These results are consistent with the findings of the present study.

Early diagnosis and active treatment can improve the survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer. Therefore, it is important to identify effective biomarkers for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. The present study showed that increased serum levels of miR-200 and miR-141 were associated with liver metastasis in colorectal cancer, and this may improve the accuracy of colorectal cancer and provide a basis for active treatment. In addition, miR-200 and miR-141 enhanced the growth of colorectal cancer, therefore, miR-200 and miR-141 maybe novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

In conclusion, the present study showed that upregulation in the serum levels of miR-200 and miR-141 were associated with liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. The overexpression of miR-200 and miR-141 exacerbated liver metastasis of colorectal cancer via inhibiting apoptosis and inducing migration.

References

1 

Siegel R, Desantis C and Jemal A: Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:104–117. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Abdalla EK, Bauer TW, Chun YS, D'Angelica M, Kooby DA and Jarnagin WR: Locoregional surgical and interventional therapies for advanced colorectal cancer liver metastases: Expert consensus statements. HPB (Oxford). 15:119–130. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, Humblet Y, Bouché O, Mineur L, Barone C, et al: Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): An international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 381:303–312. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Pritchard CC, Cheng HH and Tewari M: MicroRNA profiling: Approaches and considerations. Nat Rev Genet. 13:358–369. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Friedman RC and Burge CB: MicroRNA target finding by comparative genomics. Methods Mol Biol. 1097:457–476. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Iorio MV and Croce CM: MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: Diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review. EMBO Mol Med. 9:8522017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Schee K, Boye K, Abrahamsen TW, Fodstad Ø and Flatmark K: Clinical relevance of microRNA miR-21, miR-31, miR-92a, miR-101, miR-106a and miR-145 in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 12:5052012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Faltejskova P, Svoboda M, Srutova K, Mlcochova J, Besse A, Nekvindova J, Radova L, Fabian P, Slaba K, Kiss I, et al: Identification and functional screening of microRNAs highly deregulated in colorectal cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 16:2655–2666. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Zhang L, Yang F, Yuan JH, Yuan SX, Zhou WP, Huo XS, Xu D, Bi HS, Wang F and Sun SH: Epigenetic activation of the MiR-200 family contributes to H19-mediated metastasis suppression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 34:577–586. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Toiyama Y, Hur K, Tanaka K, Inoue Y, Kusunoki M, Boland CR and Goel A: Serum miR-200c is a novel prognostic and metastasis-predictive biomarker in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 259:735–743. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Hamilton SR, Bosman FT and Boffetta P: Carcinoma of the colon and rectumWHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH and Theise ND: Lyon: IARC Press; pp. 134–146. 2010

12 

Kyrylkova K, Kyryachenko S, Leid M and Kioussi C: Detection of apoptosis by TUNEL assay. Methods Mol Biol. 887:41–47. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Stevens P, An Wen Y, Li X and Gao T: Erbin-mediated regulation of colon cancer. FASEB J. 29:724–726. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ha M and Kim VN: Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 15:509–524. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Tamagawa S, Beder LB, Hotomi M, Gunduz M, Yata K, Grenman R and Yamanaka N: Role of miR-200c/miR-141 in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and migration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 33:879–886. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lynch SM, O'Neill KM, McKenna MM, Walsh CP and McKenna DJ: Regulation of miR-200c and miR-141 by methylation in prostate cancer. Prostate. 76:1146–1159. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Gibbons DL, Lin W, Creighton CJ, Rizvi ZH, Gregory PA, Goodall GJ, Thilaganathan N, Du L, Zhang Y, Pertsemlidis A and Kurie JM: Contextual extracellular cues promote tumor cell EMT and metastasis by regulating miR-200 family expression. Genes Dev. 23:2140–2151. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Brabletz T: EMT and MET in metastasis: Where are the cancer stem cells? Cancer Cell. 22:699–701. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Lu M, Marsters S, Ye X, Luis E, Gonzalez L and Ashkenazi A: E-cadherin couples death receptors to the cytoskeleton to regulate apoptosis. Mol Cell. 54:987–998. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Yu H, Shen Y, Hong J, Xia Q, Zhou F and Liu X: The contribution of TGF-β in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT): down-regulation of E-cadherin via snail. Neoplasma. 62:1–15. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, Vadas MA, Khew-Goodall Y and Goodall GJ: The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 10:593–601. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2017
Volume 16 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ding M, Zhang T, Li S, Zhang Y, Qiu Y and Zhang B: Correlation analysis between liver metastasis and serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 in patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep 16: 7791-7795, 2017
APA
Ding, M., Zhang, T., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2017). Correlation analysis between liver metastasis and serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 in patients with colorectal cancer. Molecular Medicine Reports, 16, 7791-7795. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7538
MLA
Ding, M., Zhang, T., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., Zhang, B."Correlation analysis between liver metastasis and serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 in patients with colorectal cancer". Molecular Medicine Reports 16.5 (2017): 7791-7795.
Chicago
Ding, M., Zhang, T., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., Zhang, B."Correlation analysis between liver metastasis and serum levels of miR‑200 and miR‑141 in patients with colorectal cancer". Molecular Medicine Reports 16, no. 5 (2017): 7791-7795. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7538