Expression and significance of autonomic nerves and α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Hui Zhou
    • Baojun Shi
    • Yitao Jia
    • Gang Qiu
    • Weiguang Yang
    • Jiali Li
    • Zhaolong Zhao
    • Jian Lv
    • Yanni Zhang
    • Zhongxin Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 13, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8883
  • Pages: 8423-8431
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study evaluated the distribution of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves and the expression of the α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α9nAChR) and investigated their potential association with colorectal cancer (CRC) development. The distribution of autonomic nerves and α9nAChR in CRC was detected by immunohistochemistry, which was then used to analyze their association with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Sympathetic fibers were primarily observed in the stroma adjacent to cancer cells, whereas parasympathetic fibers were primarily observed in the stroma away from cancer cells. Patients with samples positive for sympathetic nerve fibers had less lymph node invasion and a better prognosis compared with patients with samples negative for sympathetic nerve fibers. The expression of parasympathetic nerves in patients >60 years old was increased compared with patients ≤60 years old. The expression of parasympathetic nerves in patients with lymph node invasion was increased compared with patients without lymph node invasion. The detection of parasympathetic nerves gradually increased as CRC (T stage) advanced. Patients with parasympathetic negative samples had better prognoses compared with patients with parasympathetic positive samples. The expression of α9nAChR was principally localized in cellular membranes and the cytoplasm of CRC tissues and it was revealed to have a positive association with the number of parasympathetic nerves. Increased α9nAChR expression was observed in patients >60 years old compared with patients <60 years old. The detection rate of α9nAChR in tissues from patients with lymph node invasion was increased compared with patients without lymph node invasion. The detection of α9nAChR gradually increased as the CRC stage advanced. The prognoses for patients with α9nAChR negative tissue were improved compared with the prognoses for patients with α9nAChR positive tissue. Sympathetic nerves were primarily detected in the early phases of CRC and indicated a good prognosis. Parasympathetic nerves and α9nAChR were principally observed in the late phases of cancer and indicated a poor prognosis. The present study revealed that parasympathetic nerves may promote the progression of CRC through α9nAChR.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most commonly diagnosed malignant disease worldwide, after lung, stomach and liver cancer (1). It is estimated that CRC ranks as the fourth and fifth most common cause of cancer death among women and men in China. The prevalence of CRC is rapidly increasing owing to changes in people's lifestyle, such as smoking, obesity, and red meat consumption (2). Despite advances in traditional treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and surgery, there has been no significant breakthrough in the overall curative therapy. The five-year survival rate after diagnosis remains less than 60% (3,4). Like other cancers, CRC exhibits resistance to cell death, the ability of replication, angiogenesis, tissue invasion and metastasis, and immune escape (5). According to a medical view considering Darwinian evolution, the tumor may be a ‘new species’ in the body that has an increased ability to proliferate and metastasize (6). Tumors may have highly evolved and conserved information transmission systems, so that large numbers of tumor cells can coordinately proliferate, hibernate and metastasize. Steven Paget's theory of ‘seed and soil’ was considered a milestone in tumor research. It proposed that a suitable microenvironment is the primary requirement for malignant cells to survive in other non-primary focal areas and to continue to grow and form metastases (7). In 1971, Folkman et al proposed the concept of ‘angiogenesis’ in tumors (8). In 2001, Seifert et al proposed a phenomenon similar to angiogenesis, called neurogenesis (9). Subsequent studies confirmed that neurogenesis in bladder, breast, colorectal and pancreatic cancer was closely correlated with tumor progression, as well as prognosis (1014). Albo et al revealed that neurogenesis was a marker for tumor invasion and prognosis, and the five-year survival rate of patients with neurogenesis was reduced by 50% compared with those lacking neurogenesis (13). Tumors cells secrete many cytokines, such as nerve growth factor, insulin-like growth factor and brain-derived nerve growth factor, which not only promote neurogenesis within the tumor, but also play an important role in accelerating tumor development (15,16). Moreover, nerve and tumor cells may interact in an autocrine, paracrine or endocrine manner via the neuro-neoplastic synapse (17).

The autonomic nervous system consists of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves. Magnon et al (18) revealed that in prostate cancer, sympathetic nerves are mainly distributed in normal tissue around the tumor, and parasympathetic nerves are mainly found between the tumor cells. Both types of nerves show complementary progressive effects in tumor occurrence and development. Sympathetic nerves were observed in the early stages of prostate cancer and were associated with occurrence of disease. Parasympathetic nerves were mainly expressed in the late stage, associated with poor progression and metastasis (18). Cutting parasympathetic nerves or local injection of neurotoxic drugs significantly reduced tumor appearance and development, but the effects were limited to regions of innervations (19). Considering this point, parasympathetic nerves were more closely associated with the progression of tumors than the sympathetic nerves. Disrupted cholinergic signals may inhibit Wnt signaling pathways and stem cell proliferation. Blocking or knockdown of the choline M3 receptor inhibited gastric cancer (20). However, to date, the clinical significance of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves in human CRC has not been reported.

There are multiple neurotransmitter receptors on tumor cells that may affect tumor development (21). Parasympathetic neurotransmission involves acetylcholine (ACh) and two types of cholinergic receptor (acetylcholine receptor, AChR), the toadstool alkali (M) and nicotinic (N) type receptors. The M type receptor has five subtypes: those found in the central nervous system are M1, M3 and M4, and those in peripheral nerves are M1, M2 and M3. The N type cholinergic receptor (nAChR) is a pentameric gate control ion channel composed of different subunits (α2-α10, β2-β4) (22). Because cancer cells express many kinds of AChR (2326), cholinergic neurotransmitters or other agonists can affect tumor progression via their corresponding receptors. Currently, α7nAChR is widely studied because it has a role in tumor development, such as pancreatic and lung cancer, by regulating signaling pathways such as PI3K-AKT, NF-κB and STAT (2729). Another cholinergic receptor, α9nAChR, was overexpressed in malignant tumors, especially in breast cancer (30,31), and promoted breast cancer metastasis by activating vimentin and fibronectin (32,33). The expression and significance of α9nAChR in CRC remains unknown. In this study, we examined the expression of autonomic nerves and α9nAChR in CRC by immunohistochemical methods, and then analyzed their relationship with clinical stages, lymph node metastasis and prognosis.

Materials and methods

Patients and specimens

During January 2008 to January 2011, tissue samples were collected (by the same surgeon) from 90 patients with CRC at the Second Department of Surgery of the Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. All patients were undergoing their first CRC surgery. Before surgery, no patients received radiation or chemotherapy, and all CRC was confirmed by pathology for adenocarcinoma. CRC tissues were stock in the paraffin-embeded form after fixation in formalin and dehydration with increasing-concentration alcohol. Collection and use of specimens were approved with the patients' informed consent and by the ethics committee of the Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Total survival time was defined from diagnosis to time of patient's death or the last follow-up visit. Postoperative TNM stage of CRC followed the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer grading system (34). Tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) system are considered as standardized classification system for evaluating cancer at a population level in terms of the extent of disease, determined by cancer biology and habitual nature as well as predicting cancer outcome and response to treatment.

Histological analysis

Immunohistochemistry detected the expression of autonomic nerves and α9nAChR in a tumor microenvironment. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) were used as specific markers for sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, respectively. Tissue samples were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde, decalcified, paraffin-embedded and sectioned to 3–5 µm. Paraffin sections were dewaxed, rehydrated and treated for standard antigen retrieval, and incubated with anti-TH antibody (rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody, ab6211, Massachusetts, USA, 1:500) and anti-VAChT antibody (rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody, ab68984, Massachusetts, USA, 1:100). An antibody for a9nAChR (rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody, ab177119, Massachusetts, USA, 1:100) was used to detect expression of α9nAChR. Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP antibody (Aorui Dongyuan Biotechnology, Wuxi, China) was used as secondary antibody and specific binding detected using DAB (Zhongshan Jinqiao Biotechnology, Beijing, China). An OLYMPUS BX61 universal microscope was used to analyze slide images, with nerve fibers stained brown or yellow designed as positive. For α9nAChR detection, the presence of brown-yellow or brown particles in the cell membrane or in the plasma was defined as a positive image. According to the proportion of positive cells and the staining strength of positive cells, the experimental results of α9nAChR were determined. A: The proportion of positive cells <1/3 was scored as 1 point; the proportion of positive cells 1/3 ~ 2/3 was scored as 2 point; the proportion of positive cells >2/3 was scored as 3 point. B: According to the staining of the cells, the non-positive cells was scored as 0 point; the light yellow was scored as 1 point; the claybank was scored as 2 point; and the tan was scored as 3 point. The integral is equal to A × B. A × B=0 was classified as (−); A × B=1 ~ 2 was classified as (+); A × B=3 ~ 4 was classified as (+ +); A × B=6 ~ 9 was classified as (+ + +).

Statistical analysis

Relationships between the presence of autonomic nerves or α9nAChR and the clinical pathology were assessed using chi-square and correlation tests. Cox proportional risk regression analysis was used for single variable and multivariate analysis to examine the underlying prognostic factors of overall survival. Cox regression analyses were used to analyze survival status. Survival curve differences were analyzed using the log-rank test. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS22.0 statistical analysis software. Two-side tests were used to compare statistical differences, and P<0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with CRC

The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with CRC in this trial are shown in Table I. A return visit for 90 patients was completed via telephone. Seventy-three cases provided survival data, and 19 cases died before the return visit, all of whom died of postoperative tumor distant metastasis (pulmonary, bone and multiple metastases in 11, 4 and 5 cases, respectively). The overall survival rate was 73.97%. The prognosis was not significantly associated with gender, location and stage of cancer (P>0.05). The prognosis of lymph node metastatic negative patients was greater than that of lymph node metastasis positive patients (P<0.05). Considering the few cases of CRC in stage I, we combined the cases in stages I and II, and compared them with stage III cases. Patients with stages I+II CRC had a better prognosis than those with stage III CRC (P<0.05).

Table I.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of 73 patients with colorectal cancer.

Table I.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of 73 patients with colorectal cancer.

5-year survival rateOS


CharacteristicTotal no.Sur no.Sur R (%)HR95% CIP-value
Gender
  Male4334−79.101
  Female4737−78.700.9680.393–2.3840.944
Location
  Rectum5543−78.201
  Colon3528−80.000.9040.356–2.2980.833
T stage
  T121−50.001
  T22018−90.000.2350.021–2.5980.238
  T32922−75.900.6410.057–4.9950.648
  T43930−76.900.5340.068–4.2180.552
LN
  (+)4229−69.001
  (−)4842−87.500.3570.135–0.9390.037a
TNM
  I+II5045−90.001
  III4026−65.004.2731.536–11.8880.005a
PN
  (+)4529−64.401
  (−)4542−93.300.1610.047–0.5540.005a
SN
  (+)4842−87.501
  (−)4229−69.002.8221.070–7.4440.036a
α9
  (+)4026−56.001
  (−)5045−90.000.2280.082–0.6340.005a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-mmr-17-06-8423'] } Cox regression analyses were used to analyze survival status.

a P<0.05. LN, lymph nodes; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis; PN, parasympathetic nerve; SN, sympathetic nerve; α9, α9nAChR; Sur R, survival rate.

Expression of autonomic nerves and α9nAChR in CRC

Expression of autonomic nerves and α9nAChR in CRC is shown in Fig. 1. Most of the sympathetic fibers were seen in the stroma adjacent to cancer cells (Fig. 1A). Most of the parasympathetic fibers were seen in the stroma away from cancer cells (Fig. 1B). Some parasympathetic fibers surrounded the blood vessels (Fig. 1C) and were sporadically located in tertiary lymphoid tissue (Fig. 1D). The α9nAChR was expressed in CRC tissues (Fig. 1E), and was not detected in normal rectal tissues (Fig. 1F).

Relationship between autonomic nerves as well as α9nAChR and the survival rate of patients with CRC

Relationships between autonomic nerves as well as α9nAChR and the survival rate of patients with CRC are shown in Fig. 2. Comparison of survival rates of patients with CRC showed that patients with sympathetic nerve positive CRC tissue had a better prognosis compared with those having sympathetic nerve negative tissue. There was a significant difference (P<0.05) between the survival rates of these two groups (Fig. 2A). Patients with parasympathetic nerve positive tissue had a worse prognosis compared with patients that had parasympathetic nerve negative tissue, shown by the significant difference (P<0.05) between the survival rates of these two groups (Fig. 2B). Patients with α9nAChR positive CRC tissue had a worse prognosis compared with patients that had α9nAChR negative tissue, shown by the significant difference (P < 0.05) between the survival rates of these two groups (Fig. 2C).

Relationship between autonomic nerves as well as α9nAChR and the clinical pathology of CRC

The relationships between sympathetic nerves and clinical pathological features are shown in Table II. The presence of sympathetic nerves had no significant correlation with age, tumor location, gender, and cancer stages (T and TNM criteria). The lymph node invasion rate of patients with sympathetic nerve positive tissue was significantly lower than that of patients with sympathetic nerve negative tissue (41.7 vs. 66.7%, P=0.018), suggesting that sympathetic nerves are inversely related to the lymph node invasion.

Table II.

Association between sympathetic nerves and clinical pathological features.

Table II.

Association between sympathetic nerves and clinical pathological features.

Sympathetic nerve

Characteristic/group+NExpression rate (%)P-value
Gender 0.382
  Male18254358.1
  Female24234748.9
Age 0.571
  ≤6022285056.0
  >6020204050.0
Location 0.58
  Rectum21143540.0
  Colon27285550.9
T 0.555
  T1022100.0
  T29112055.0
  T315142948.3
  T419203951.3
N 0.018a
  N014284266.7
  N+28204841.7

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-mmr-17-06-8423'] } Cox proportional risk regression analysis was used for single variable and multivariate analysis to examine the underlying prognostic factors of overall survival.

a P<0.05. T, tumor; N, lymph node.

The relationships between parasympathetic nerves and clinical pathological characteristics are shown in Table III. The presence of parasympathetic nerves was not significantly associated with tumor location and gender (P>0.05). Patients >60 years of age had a higher incidence of parasympathetic nerve expression compared with those ≤60 years of age (62.5 vs. 40.0%, P=0.034). Patients with lymph node invasion had a higher incidence of parasympathetic nerve expression than those without lymph nodes invasion (62.5 vs. 35.7%, P=0.011). As the cancer (T stage) advanced, parasympathetic nerve positive rates gradually increased (T1 50.0 T2 25.0 T3 48.3 and T4 64.1%, P=0.043), suggesting that the presence of parasympathetic nerves was positively correlated with age, lymph node invasion and cancer T stage.

Table III.

Association between parasympathetic nerves and clinical pathological features.

Table III.

Association between parasympathetic nerves and clinical pathological features.

Sympathetic nerve

Characteristic/group+NExpression rate (%)P-value
Gender 0.291
  Male19244355.80
  Female26214744.70
Age 0.034a
  ≤6030205040.00
  >6015254062.50
Location 0.052
  Rectum22133537.10
  Colon23325558.20
T 0.043a
  T111250.00
  T21552025.00
  T315142948.30
  T414253964.10
N 0.011a
  N027154235.70
  N+18304862.50

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-mmr-17-06-8423'] } Cox proportional risk regression analysis was used for single variable and multivariate analysis to examine the underlying prognostic factors of overall survival.

a P<0.05. T, tumor; N, lymph node.

The relationships between α9nAChR and clinical pathological features are shown in Table IV. The expression of α9nAChR was not associated with gender or tumor location of CRC patients (P > 0.05). The expression of α9nAChR in patients >60 years of age was higher than that of patients ≤60 years of age (57.5 vs. 34.0%, P=0.026). The expression of α9nAChR in patients with lymph node invasion was significantly higher than that of patients without lymph nodes invasion (66.7 vs. 42.9%, P=0.023). As the cancer T stage advanced, the expression of α9nAChR gradually increased (0 T1, 20.0 T2, 44.8 T3, 59.0% T4, P=0.021), suggesting that α9nAChR expression was positively correlated with age, cancer T stage and lymph node invasion.

Table IV.

Association between α9nAChR and clinical pathological features.

Table IV.

Association between α9nAChR and clinical pathological features.

Α9nachr

Characteristic/group+NExpression rate (%)P-value
Gender 0.962
  Male24194344.20
  Female26214744.70
Age 0.026a
  ≤6033175034.00
  >6017234057.50
Location 0.134
  Rectum19163545.70
  Colon21345561.80
T 0.021a
  T12020
  T21642020.00
  T316132944.80
  T416233959.00
N 0.023a
  N024184242.90
  N+16324866.70

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn7-mmr-17-06-8423'] } Cox proportional risk regression analysis was used for single variable and multivariate analysis to examine the underlying prognostic factors of overall survival.

a P<0.05. T, tumor; N, lymph node.

Discussion

In the present study, we revealed that there are sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves in the human CRC microenvironment. Sympathetic fibers were mainly found in the stroma adjacent to cancer cells. Patients with sympathetic nerves detected in CRC tissue have less lymph node invasion compared with patients exhibiting tissue with no detectable sympathetic nerves. The presence of sympathetic nerves in CRC had no significant correlation with age, tumor location, gender, and cancer (T and TNM) stage. The prognosis of patients with sympathetic nerve positive CRC was better than patients with sympathetic negative tissue. Parasympathetic fibers were mainly detected in the stroma away from cancer cells, and some parasympathetic fibers were observed around the blood vessels. The expression of α9nAChR was mainly located in cellular membrane and cytoplasm of CRC tissues. The detection of parasympathetic nerves and α9nAChR was positively related to cancer T stage, lymph node invasion and age; as expression of parasympathetic nerves and α9nAChR increased in CRC tissue, the prognosis of patients became poor, suggesting that parasympathetic nerves may participate in the late development of tumors via α9nAChR.

Tumors are not an isolated structure, and are associated with the microenvironment of the host tissues (35). Recently, researchers reported that neurogenesis was present in colorectal tumors (36). Our study also revealed that there were sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves in CRC. Parasympathetic nerves were closely associated with the development of tumors. Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter in parasympathetic nerves, which function via the AChR (37,38). The AChR is also expressed in some non-neuronal cells, such as lung cancer and CRC cells (39). Nicotine, as well as its structural analogues nitrosamines 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and N'-nitrosonornicotine, can activate a variety of nAChR subtypes found in the parasympathetic nervous system, resulting in a various biological responses (40). Nicotine can induce the proliferation of a variety of cancer cells, such as small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic and colon cancer cells, in receptor-dependent manner (41,42). In human bronchial epithelial cells and lung cancer cells, the α7nAChR inhibitors mecamylamine reduced cell proliferation mediated by nicotine (43). Moreover, the nAChR antagonist d-tubocurarine reduced the proliferation of MSTO-211 mesothelioma cells in vitro (44). Another type of AChR was found in mammalian ear vestibular hair cells type II, called α9nAChR (45). The α9nAChR was closely associated with the development of breast cancer (46,47). To date, there have been no reports regarding the role of α9nAChR in CRC. In the current study, α9nAChR was mainly expressed in the cellular cytoplasm and membranes of CRC tissue, and was not detected in normal colorectal tissues and tumor stroma, which suggested that α9nAChR may not be essential for normal neurotransmitter signaling. We propose that α9nAChR may be induced by some factors found in the tumor, and then plays a role in promoting tumor development by downstream signaling events.

In addition, we found that parasympathetic nerve fibers also exist in tumor tertiary lymphoid tissue, which suggested that parasympathetic nerves are closely associated with immune cells. Immune cells, such as T and B cells, and monocytes, express all five kinds of toadstool alkali AChR (mAChR M1-M5) and different types of nAChR, such as α3, α5, α7, α9 and α10, which provide the structural basis for parasympathetic nerves to regulate the immune system (48). Borovikova et al (49) proposed the concept of the ‘cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway’, in which ACh released by parasympathetic nerves acted upon α7nAChR in macrophages, which inhibited immune function by suppressing a variety of inflammatory factors (such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and high mobility group protein (49,50). The electrical stimulation of parasympathetic nerves or α7nAChR-specific agonists both reduced local or systemic inflammatory responses (51). These findings have been applied to the study of Alzheimer's disease (52), rheumatoid arthritis (53), and endotoxin blood disease (54). Furthermore, nicotine increased the expression of phosphorylated STAT5 by activating α7nAChR on regulatory T cells, ultimately resulting in elevated activity of regulatory T cells, which restrained T cell immunosuppression (55). Therefore, parasympathetic nerves may directly act on tumor cells, as well as inhibit immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, with combined AChR receptor responses promoting tumor progression. The current study may ultimately provide a new avenue for the treatment of CRC.

We found that the expression of parasympathetic nerves in CRC was positively related to the age of the patient. It is well known that the prevalence of both cancer and Alzheimer's disease increases gradually with age (56). Musicco et al reported that cancer rates in patients with Alzheimer's disease were reduced by 50% compared with normal people of the same age. However, the rates of Alzheimer's disease in cancer patients were reduced by 35% compared with healthy people of the same age (57). Another epidemiological study showed a reduction of malignant tumor risk was associated with Alzheimer's disease, and the risk of malignant tumors was further reduced using stringent criteria for the diagnosis of dementia (58), which excluded the point that the incidence of malignant tumors affected cognitive impairment. Elderly cognitive impairment may involve chronic inflammation, together with reduced excitability of parasympathetic nerves or the reduction of ACh synthesis and release. The tumor is usually associated with abnormal activation of parasympathetic nerves, which may inhibit immune and inflammatory responses and promote tumor progression. Hence, parasympathetic nerves may provide a ‘bridge’ connecting cognitive disorders with tumors. Ongoing investigations into the use of parasympathetic treatments for these two diseases will have to consider the complications that may arise from multiple AChR actions. Regulating the excitability of parasympathetic nerves to maintain an ‘appropriate’ state is likely to be an important subject of geriatric medicine in the future.

In conclusion, sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves were found in human CRC. Sympathetic nerves were mostly detected in early phases of cancer associated with good prognosis, whereas parasympathetic nerves and α9nAChR were mostly observed in late phases of cancer associated with bad prognosis. The expression of parasympathetic nerves and α9nAChR were positively correlated. These results suggest that parasympathetic nerves may promote the progression of CRC through α9nAChR. The exact role and mechanism of autonomic nervous system actions in CRC deserve further study.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by The Program of Clinical Excellent Talents of Hebei Province.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

CRC

colorectal cancer

α9nAChR

α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Ach

acetylcholine

AChR

acetylcholine receptor

nAChR

N type cholinergic receptor

TNM

tumor, lymph node, metastasis

TH

Tyrosine hydroxylase

VAChT

vesicular acetylcholine transporter

References

1 

Siegel R, Desantis C and Jemal A: Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:104–117. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, Jemal A, Schymura MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Seeff LC, et al: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 116:544–573. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Feng B, Sun J, Ling TL, Lu AG, Wang ML, Chen XY, Ma JJ, Li JW, Zang L, Han DP and Zheng MH: Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with medial access for right-hemi colon cancer: Feasibility and technical strategies. Surg Endosc. 26:3669–3675. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Sun J1, Jiang T, Qiu Z, Cen G, Cao J, Huang K, Pu Y, Liang H, Huang R and Chen S: Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: A single center retrospective case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol. 11:852011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pienta KJ, McGregor N, Axelrod R and Axelrod DE: ecological therapy for cancer: Defining tumors using an ecosystem paradigm suggests new opportunities for novel cancer treatments. Transl Oncol. 1:158–164. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Li Q: Circulating tumor cells: Determining its number and what it means. Cytometry A. 77:211–212. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Folkman J, Merler E, Abernathy C and Williams G: Isolation of a tumor factor responsible for angiogenesis. J Exp Med. 133:275–288. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Seifert P and Spitznas M: Tumours may be innervated. Virchows Arch. 438:228–231. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Mitchell BS, Schumacher U and Kaiserling E: Are tumours innervated? Immunohistological investigations using antibodies against the neuronal marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) in benign, malignant and experimental tumours. Tumour Biol. 15:269–274. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Seifert P, Benedic M and Effert P: Nerve fibers in tumors of the human urinary bladder. Virchows Arch. 440:291–297. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Kayahara M, Nakagawara H, Kitagawa H and Ohta T: The nature of neural invasion by pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 35:218–223. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Albo D, Akay CL, Marshall CL, Wilks JA, Verstovsek G, Liu H, Agarwal N, Berger DH and Ayala GE: Neurogenesis in colorectal cancer is a marker of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcomes. Cancer. 117:4834–4845. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Lolas G, Bianchi A and Syrigos KN: Tumour-induced neoneurogenesis and perineural tumour growth: A mathematical approach. Sci Rep. 6:206842016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Giger RJ, Hollis ER IId and Tuszynski MH: Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2:a0018672010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Mancino M, Ametller E, Gascón P and Almendro V: The neuronal influence on tumor progression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1816:105–118. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Zänker KS: The neuro-neoplastic synapse: Does it exist? Prog Exp Tumor Res. 39:154–161. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Magnon C, Hall SJ, Lin J, Xue X, Gerber L, Freedland SJ and Frenette PS: Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science. 341:12363612013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Tang J, Li Z, Lu L and Cho CH: β-Adrenergic system, a backstage manipulator regulating tumour progression and drug target in cancer therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 23:533–542. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Zhao CM, Hayakawa Y, Kodama Y, Muthupalani S, Westphalen CB, Andersen GT, Flatberg A, Johannessen H, Friedman RA, Renz BW, et al: Denervation suppresses gastric tumorigenesis. Sci Transl Med. 6:250ra1152014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Marjolaine PR, Michèle L, Benjamin D, Bruno B and Muriel JS: Role of cholinergic receptors in colorectal cancer: Potential therapeutic implications of vagus nerve stimulation? J Cancer Ther. 4:1116–1131. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Hulme EC, Birdsall NJ and Buckley NJ: Muscarinic receptor subtypes. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 30:633–673. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Jia Y, Jia Y, Zu S, Zhang Y, Xiao D, Wang D and Ma X: Hypoxia-induced overexpression of alpha5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor of human lung cancer cell lines. 2014 IEEE Workshop on Electronics, Computer and Applications. IEEE. 969–971. 2014.

24 

Zhao Q, Yue J, Zhang C, Gu X, Chen H and Xu L: Inactivation of M2 AChR/NF-κB signaling axis reverses epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and suppresses migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oncotarget. 6:29335–29346. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Grando SA: Connections of nicotine to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 14:419–429. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Zhao Y, Zhou W, Xue L, Zhang W and Zhan Q: Nicotine activates YAP1 through nAChRs mediated signaling in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). PLoS One. 9:e908362014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Al-Wadei MH, Al-Wadei HA and Schuller HM: Pancreatic cancer cells and normal pancreatic duct epithelial cells express an autocrine catecholamine loop that is activated by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors alpha3, α5, and α7. Mol Cancer Res. 10:239–249. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Dang N, Meng X and Song H: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and cancer. Biomed Rep. 4:515–518. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Yue Y, Liu R, Cheng W, Hu Y, Li J, Pan X, Peng J and Zhang P: GTS-21 attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cytokine production in vitro by modulating the Akt and NF-κB signaling pathway through the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Int Immunopharmacol. 29:504–512. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Wu C, Hu Z, Yu D, Huang L, Jin G, Liang J, Guo H, Tan W, Zhang M, Qian J, et al: Genetic variants on chromosome 15q25 associated with lung cancer risk in Chinese populations. Cancer Res. 69:5065–5072. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Changeux JP: Nicotine addiction and nicotinic receptors: Lessons from genetically modified mice. Nat Rev Neurosci. 11:389–401. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Lee CH, Huang CS, Chen CS, Tu SH, Wang YJ, Chang YJ, Tam KW, Wei PL, Cheng TC, Chu JS, et al: Overexpression and activation of the alpha9-nicotinic receptor during tumorigenesis in human breast epithelial cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 102:1322–1335. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Tu SH, Lin YC, Huang CC, Yang PS, Chang HW, Chang CH, Wu CH, Chen LC and Ho YS: Protein phosphatase Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1F promotes smoking-induced breast cancer by inactivating phosphorylated-p53-induced signals. Oncotarget. 7:77516–77531. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR and Winchester DP: The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ‘personalized’ approach to cancer staging. Ca Carcer J Clin. 67:93–99. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Ho YJ, Wang TC, Fan CH and Yeh CK: Current progress in antivascular tumor therapy. Drug Discov Today. 22:1503–1515. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Li M, Yang C, Liu X, Yuan L, Zhang F, Wang M, Miao D, Gu X, Jiang S, Cui B, et al: EphA3 promotes malignant transformation of colorectal epithelial cells by upregulating oncogenic pathways. Cancer Lett. 383:195–203. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Wu X and Tüzün E: Are linear AChR epitopes the real culprit in ocular myasthenia gravis. Med Hypotheses. 99:26–28. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Wong HP, Yu L, Lam EK, Tai EK, Wu WK and Cho CH: Nicotine promotes colon tumor growth and angiogenesis through beta-adrenergic activation. Toxicol Sci. 97:279–287. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Wu CH, Lee CH and Ho YS: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-based blockade: Applications of molecular targets for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 17:3533–3541. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Lee CH, Chang YC, Chen CS, Tu SH, Wang YJ, Chen LC, Chang YJ, Wei PL, Chang HW, Chang CH, et al: Crosstalk between nicotine and estrogen-induced estrogen receptor activation induces α9-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 129:331–345. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Guertin KA, Gu F, Wacholder S, Freedman ND, Panagiotou OA, Reyes-Guzman C and Caporaso NE: Time to first morning cigarette and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Smokers in the PLCO cancer screening trial. PLoS One. 10:e01259732015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Luberto CM, Hyland KA, Streck JM, Temel B and Park ER: Stigmatic and sympathetic attitudes toward cancer patients who smoke: A qualitative analysis of an online discussion board forum. Nicotine Tob Res. 18:2194–2201. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Nuutinen S, Panula P and Salminen O: Different hypothalamic nicotinic α7 receptor expression and response to low nicotine dose in alcohol-preferring and alcohol-avoiding rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 40:329–334. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Cesario A, Russo P, Nastrucci C and Granone P: Is α7-nAChR a possible target for lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma treatment. Curr Drug Targets. 13:688–694. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Holt JC, Lioudyno M, Athas G, Garcia MM, Perin P and Guth PS: The effect of proteolytic enzymes on the alpha9-nicotinic receptor-mediated response in isolated frog vestibular hair cells. Hear Res. 152:25–42. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Guha P, Bandyopadhyaya G, Polumuri SK, Chumsri S, Gade P, Kalvakolanu DV and Ahmed H: Nicotine promotes apoptosis resistance of breast cancer cells and enrichment of side population cells with cancer stem cell-like properties via a signaling cascade involving galectin-3, α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and STAT3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 145:5–22. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Zhou T, Wang Y, Guo CK, Zhang WJ, Yu H, Zhang K and Kong WJ: Two distinct channels mediated by m2mAChR and α9nAChR co-exist in type II vestibular hair cells of guinea pig. Int J Mol Sci. 14:8818–8831. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Kawashima K, Fujii T, Moriwaki Y and Misawa H: Critical roles of acetylcholine and the muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of immune function. Life Sci. 91:1027–1032. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, Yang H, Botchkina GI, Watkins LR, Wang H, Abumrad N, Eaton JW and Tracey KJ: Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature. 405:458–462. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Bencherif M, Lippiello PM, Lucas R and Marrero MB: Alpha7 nicotinic receptors as novel therapeutic targets for inflammation-based diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 68:931–949. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Zhang R, Wugeti N, Sun J, Yan H, Guo Y, Zhang L, Ma M, Guo X, Jiao C, Xu W, et al: Effects of vagus nerve stimulation via cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway activation on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in canine. Int J Clin Exp Med. 7:2615–2623. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

52 

Vicens P, Ribes D, Heredia L, Torrente M and Domingo JL: Motor and anxiety effects of PNU-282987, an alpha7 nicotinic receptor agonist, and stress in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 10:516–523. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Koopman FA, Schuurman PR, Vervoordeldonk MJ and Tak PP: Vagus nerve stimulation: A new bioelectronics approach to treat rheumatoid arthritis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 28:625–635. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Mazloom R, Eftekhari G, Rahimi-Balaei M, Khori V, Hajizadeh S, Dehpour AR and Mani AR: Correction: The role of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in modulation of heart rate dynamics in endotoxemic rats. PLoS One. 10:e01278262015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Marrero MB and Bencherif M: Convergence of alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-activated pathways for anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammation: Central role for JAK2 activation of STAT3 and NF-kappaB. Brain Res. 1256:1–7. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Daianu M, Jahanshad N, Nir TM, Toga AW, Jack CR Jr, Weiner MW and Thompson PM: Alzheimer's DiseaseNeuroimaging Initiative: Breakdown of brain connectivity between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease: A structural k-core network analysis. Brain Connect. 3:407–422. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Musicco M, Adorni F, Di Santo S, Prinelli F, Pettenati C, Caltagirone C, Palmer K and Russo A: Inverse occurrence of cancer and Alzheimer disease: A population-based incidence study. Neurology. 81:322–328. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Roe CM, Fitzpatrick AL, Xiong C, Sieh W, Kuller L, Miller JP, Williams MM, Kopan R, Behrens MI and Morris JC: Cancer linked to Alzheimer disease but not vascular dementia. Neurology. 74:106–112. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2018
Volume 17 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhou H, Shi B, Jia Y, Qiu G, Yang W, Li J, Zhao Z, Lv J, Zhang Y, Li Z, Li Z, et al: Expression and significance of autonomic nerves and α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep 17: 8423-8431, 2018
APA
Zhou, H., Shi, B., Jia, Y., Qiu, G., Yang, W., Li, J. ... Li, Z. (2018). Expression and significance of autonomic nerves and α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in colorectal cancer. Molecular Medicine Reports, 17, 8423-8431. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8883
MLA
Zhou, H., Shi, B., Jia, Y., Qiu, G., Yang, W., Li, J., Zhao, Z., Lv, J., Zhang, Y., Li, Z."Expression and significance of autonomic nerves and α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in colorectal cancer". Molecular Medicine Reports 17.6 (2018): 8423-8431.
Chicago
Zhou, H., Shi, B., Jia, Y., Qiu, G., Yang, W., Li, J., Zhao, Z., Lv, J., Zhang, Y., Li, Z."Expression and significance of autonomic nerves and α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in colorectal cancer". Molecular Medicine Reports 17, no. 6 (2018): 8423-8431. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8883