MicroRNA‑629 inhibition suppresses the viability and invasion of non‑small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting RUNX3

Retraction in: /10.3892/mmr.2023.12930

  • Authors:
    • Bufeng Zhuang
    • Youshuang Cheng
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 27, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.9990
  • Pages: 3933-3940
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) directly modulate the biological functions of non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells and contribute to the initiation and progression of NSCLC; however, the specific roles and underlying mechanisms of the dysregulated miRNAs in NSCLC require further investigation. The present study reported that miRNA‑629‑5p (miR‑629) was upregulated in NSCLC tissues and cell lines. High miR‑629 expression levels were significantly associated with tumour size, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis in patients with NSCLC. Functional experiments indicated that miR‑629 inhibition suppressed the viability and invasion NSCLC cells in vitro. Furthermore, bioinformatics prediction, luciferase reporter assay, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis demonstrated that runt‑related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) was a direct target gene of miR‑629 in NSCLC. Restoration of RUNX3 expression suppressed the effects of miR‑629 inhibition in NSCLC cells. Rescue experiments revealed that RUNX3 knockdown partially abrogated the effects of miR‑629 inhibition on NSCLC cells. In summary, miR‑629 directly targeted RUNX3 to inhibit the progression of NSCLC, suggesting that this miRNA may be considered as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for patients with NSCLC.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in males and females worldwide (1). Lung cancer can be pathologically subdivided into two principal types: Small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (2). NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer and accounts for ~80% of all lung cancer cases (3). Numerous risk factors of NSCLC have been identified, including long-term tobacco smoking, specific gene mutations and exposure to radon gas, asbestos and other types of environmental pollutants (46). Notable developments in the diagnosis and therapy of NSCLC have been made; however, the overall survival of patients with NSCLC remains unsatisfactory (7). The 5-year survival rate of patients diagnosed with NSCLC at stages I and IV is 67 and 1%, respectively (8). Tumour recurrence and metastasis are mainly responsible for the poor therapeutic outcomes of patients with NSCLC (9,10). Therefore, further identification of the mechanisms underlying NSCLC occurrence and development is important for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a group of single-stranded, highly conserved and small non-coding RNA molecules that serve important roles in the oncogenesis of NSCLC (11). miRNAs can negatively regulate target gene expression by directly binding to the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of target genes, which lead to the degradation or translational suppression of targeted messenger RNAs (mRNAs) (12). At present, >1,000 miRNAs have been validated, and these miRNAs can regulate ~60% of all human genes (13). Therefore, miRNAs are involved in the regulation of various biological activities, including cell proliferation, cycle, apoptosis, differentiation, metabolism and metastasis (1416). Numerous miRNAs are dysregulated in NSCLC; their dysregulation has been associated with the pathogenesis and development of NSCLC (1719); aberrantly expressed miRNAs may serve as tumour suppressors or oncogenes, depending on the biological roles of their target genes (20). miRNAs may be developed as novel therapeutic targets in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with NSCLC.

miR-629-5p (miR-629) is upregulated in various types of human cancers (2123) and serves oncogenic roles in carcinogenesis and the progression of cancer; however, the expression profile, biological roles and associated mechanisms of miR-629 in NSCLC remain unclear. In the present study, miR-629 expression was detected in NSCLC tissues and cell lines, the effects of miR-629 in NSCLC cells were also investigated. The mechanisms underlying the oncogenic roles of miR-629 in NSCLC cells were also determined.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue specimens

A total of 51 pairs of NSCLC and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from patients with NSCLC (32 males, 19 females; age range, 43–69 years) who underwent surgical resection at the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China) between June 2014 and January 2017. Patients with NSCLC did not receive preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. All patients with NSCLC were divided into miR-629 high or low expression groups based on the median value of miR-629 expression. TNM staging system was used for the staging of NSCC (24). Following resection, all tissue specimens were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further RNA isolation. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. Written informed consent was also obtained from the patients enrolled.

Cell culture and transfection

The non-tumorigenic bronchial epithelium cell line BEAS-2B was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in LHC-9 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; both obtained from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). A total of four human NSCLC cell lines, including SK-MES-1, A549, H460 and SPC-A1 were purchased from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS, 100 IU/mm penicillin and 100 µg/mm streptomycin (all from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

miR-629 inhibitor and control miRNA (NC inhibitor) were obtained from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The miR-629 inhibitor sequence was 5′-ACCCAAAUGCAACCCUCUUGA-3′ and the NC inhibitor sequence was 5′-ACUACUGAGUGACAGUAGA-3′. To restore the expression of RUNX3, a pCMV-RUNX3 plasmid was obtained from RiboBio (Guangzhou, China); empty pCMV plasmids served as the control. To knock down the expression of endogenous RUNX3, small interfering RNA (siRNA) against the expression of RUNX3 (RUNX3 siRNA) and a negative control siRNA (NC siRNA) were purchased from OriGene Technologies, Inc. (Beijing, China). The RUNX3 siRNA sequence was 5′-TGACGAGAACTACTCCGCT-3′ and the NC siRNA sequence was 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′. Cells were seeded into 6-well plates one day prior to transfection. Transient transfection was conducted using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The concentration of plasmids, miRNAs and siRNAs used was 4 µg, 100 pmol, and 100 pmol, respectively. Following 8 h of transfection, cell culture medium was replenished with fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS.

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from tissue specimens or cells using TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols and was subjected to complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis using a TaqMan® MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The temperature protocol for reverse transcription was: 16°C for 30 min, 42°C for 30 min and 85°C for 5 min. The expression levels of miR-629 were determined using a TaqMan MicroRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and was normalized by U6. The temperature protocol for the reaction was: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec; and annealing/extension at 60°C for 60 sec. To measure the mRNA expression levels of RUNX3, RT was conducted using a PrimeScript™ RT Reagent kit, followed by qPCR with a SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (both from Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) by using an ABI 7500 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The temperature protocol for reverse transcription was: 37°C for 15 min and 85°C for 5 sec. The cycling conditions for qPCR were: 5 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec and 65°C for 45 sec. GAPDH served as an internal control for the mRNA expression of RUNX3. The relative expression levels of miR-629 and RUNX3 were calculated using the 2−∆ΔCq method (25). The primers were designed as follows: miR-629, 5′-ACTTGTCCTATAGAAGCACAAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACTTGTCCTATAGAAGCACAAC-3′ (reverse); U6, 5′-GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′ (reverse); RUNX3, 5′-GATGGCAGGCAATGACGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGCTGAAGTGGCTTGTGGT-3′ (reverse); and GAPDH, 5′-AGCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTGAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATCACCATCTTCCAGGAGCGA-3′ (reverse). Each assay was repeated three times.

MTT assay

The viability of NSCLC cells was determined using an MTT assay. For this assay, transfected cells were harvested and seeded into 96-well plates with an initial density of 3,000 cells in each well. At 0, 24, 48 and 72 h post-inoculation, a total of 20 µl MTT solution (5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was added into each well. Following incubation for another 4 h at 37°C, the culture medium was discarded, and 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to dissolve the purple formazan. The optical density of each well was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm using an automatic multi-well spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

In vitro invasion assay

Transfected cells were collected, washed with PBS and suspended into FBS-free DMEM. A total of 1×105 cells in 200 µl FBS-free DMEM was added into the upper compartment of the 24-well Transwell chambers that were precoated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); 600 µl DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was used as a chemoattractant in the lower compartments. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the non-invaded cells were carefully removed using a cotton swab. The invaded cells were then fixed with 100% methanol at 37°C for 30 min, stained with 0.5% crystal violet at 37°C for 30 min, washed with PBS and air-dried. The invaded cells were imaged with an IX71 inverted microscope (magnification, 200×; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and quantified by counting the number of invaded cells in five randomly selected fields.

Bioinformatic prediction and luciferase reporter assay

To investigate the mechanisms underlying the roles of miR-629 in NSCLC, bioinformatic analysis was performed to predict the putative targets of miR-629 using TargetScan (release 7.2; March 2018; http://www.targetscan.org/) and microRNA.org (http://www.microrna.org/). The 3′-UTR of RUNX3 containing the wild-type (Wt) or mutant (Mut) binding sequences for miR-629 was generated by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., and cloned into the pGL3 luciferase vector (XbaI and HpaI; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The Wt and Mut luciferase plasmids were defined as Wt-RUNX3-3′-UTR and Mut-RUNX3-3′-UTR, respectively. For this assay, miR-629 inhibitor or NC inhibitor, together with Wt-RUNX3-3′-UTR or Mut-RUNX3-3′-UTR, was transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 2000, according to the manufacturer's protocols. After 48 h of post-transfection, luciferase activities were determined using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocols. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to that of Renilla luciferase activity.

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

Total protein was isolated from the tissue specimens or cells using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, and the protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit (both from Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). Equal amounts of protein per lane (30 µg) were loaded and separated using 10% SDS-PAGE. The PVDF membranes were then blocked in 5% fat-free dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) at room temperature for 2 h and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. The primary antibodies included: Mouse anti-human monoclonal RUNX3 antibody (1:1,000; ab135248; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and mouse anti-human monoclonal GAPDH antibody (1:1,000; ab9482; Abcam). After washing four times with TBST, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000; ab6789; Abcam) at room temperature for 2 h. Protein signals were visualised using Pierce® ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH served as an endogenous control for the normalisation of expression. Protein expression was quantified using Quantity One software version 4.62 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Each assay was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 13.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was applied for all statistical analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments. The association between miR-629 and the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients was determined using a χ2 test. The differences between groups were analyzed with a Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus multiple comparisons. Student-Newman-Keuls test was applied as the post-hoc test following ANOVA. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-629 expression is upregulated in NSCLC tissues and cells

RT-qPCR analysis was performed to detect miR-629 expression in 51 pairs of NSCLC and adjacent normal tissues. The results revealed that miR-629 expression was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissues compared with in adjacent normal tissues (P<0.05; Fig. 1A). In addition, the association between miR-629 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with NSCLC was investigated. All patients with NSCLC were divided into miR-629 high or low expression groups based on the median value of miR-629 expression. As presented in Table I, high miR-629 expression levels were associated with tumour size (P=0.015), clinical stage (P=0.007) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.003). Furthermore, miR-629 expression was determined in NSCLC cell lines. The data of RT-qPCR analysis revealed that the expression levels of miR-629 were higher in all four tested NSCLC cell lines, including SK-MES-1, A549, H460 and SPC-A1, compared with the BEAS-2B cell line (P<0.05; Fig. 1B). These findings suggested that miR-629 upregulation may be associated with NSCLC progression.

Table I.

Association between miR-629 and the clinicopathologic characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer.

Table I.

Association between miR-629 and the clinicopathologic characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinicopathological characteristicsHigh miR-629 expressionLow miR-629 expressionP-value
Sex 0.329
  Male1814
  Female811
Age (years) 0.475
  <5068
  ≥502017
Tumor size (cm) 0.015
  <31119
  ≥3156
Differentiation 0.322
  Moderate-well1215
  Poor1410
Clinical stage 0.007
  I–II918
  III–IV177
Lymph node metastasis 0.003
  Negative1020
  Positive165

[i] miR, microRNA.

miR-629 downregulation suppresses A549 and H460 cell viability and invasion

To explore the detailed roles of miR-629 in NSCLC, A549 and H460 cell lines were selected in the subsequent experiments as these two cell lines exhibited higher miR-629 expression levels compared with SK-MES-1 and SPC-A1. miR-629 inhibitor was used to knock down miR-629 expression in A549 and H460 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 2A). An MTT assay was performed to investigate the effects of miR-629 on NSCLC cell viability. The data revealed that miR-629 inhibition suppressed the viability of A549 and H460 cells at 48 and 72 h compared with the control (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). The effects of miR-629 knockdown on the invasive ability of NSCLC cells were analysed in vitro via an invasion assay. As presented in Fig. 2C, the invasive potential of A549 and H460 cells was significantly decreased by miR-629 inhibitor compared with in the NC inhibitor groups (P<0.05). These results suggested that miR-629 may serve an oncogenic role in the development of NSCLC.

miR-629 directly targets RUNX3 in NSCLC cells

To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the oncogenic roles of miR-629 in the progression of NSCLC, bioinformatic analysis was conducted to predict the putative targets of miR-629. RUNX3, a tumour suppressor in NSCLC (2630), was determined to contain a potential binding site for miR-629 in its 3′-UTR (Fig. 3A). Luciferase reporter assays were performed to examine the association between miR-629 and RUNX3 in NSCLC. miR-629 downregulation significantly increased the luciferase activity of the plasmid with wild-type 3′-UTR in A549 and H460 cells compared with the control (P<0.05); however, the luciferase activities were notably unaffected in the plasmid carrying mutant 3′-UTR of RUNX3 (Fig. 3B). To further investigate the interaction between miR-629 and RUNX3 in NSCLC, RT-qPCR and western blot analyses were employed to respectively measure the expression levels of RUNX3 mRNA and protein in A549 and H460 cells transfected with miR-629 inhibitor or NC inhibitor. Transfection with miR-629 inhibitor significantly upregulated the expression of RUNX3 mRNA (P<0.05; Fig. 3C) and protein (P<0.05; Fig. 3D) in A549 and H460 cells compared with the control. These results suggested that RUNX3 is a direct target of miR-629 in NSCLC cells.

RUNX3 upregulation suppresses A549 and H460 cell viability and invasion

The roles of RUNX3 in NSCLC cells were investigated in the present study. A549 and H460 cells were transfected with pCMV-RUNX3 or pCMV; RUNX3 protein expression was significantly upregulated in A549 and H460 cells following transfection with pCMV-RUNX3 compared with the control (P<0.05; Fig. 4A). Subsequent MTT and invasion assays revealed that, similar to miR-629 knockdown, RUNX3 upregulation significantly suppressed the viability at 48 and 72 h, (P<0.05; Fig. 4B and C) and invasion (P<0.05; Fig. 4D) of A549 and H460 cells compared with the control. These results further demonstrated that RUNX3 is a functional downstream target of miR-629 in NSCLC.

RUNX3 knockdown reverses the phenotypes induced by miR-629 inhibition in A549 and H460 cells

Considering that RUNX3 was validated as a direct target of miR-629 in NSCLC cells, whether RUNX3 upregulation is required for the oncogenic roles of the miR-629 on NSCLC cells was investigated in the present study. Rescue experiments were performed by co-transfecting A549 and H460 cells with miR-629 inhibitor and RUNX3 siRNA or NC siRNA. Western blot analysis demonstrated that co-transfection with RUNX3 siRNA significantly downregulated the expression of RUNX3 in A549 and H460 cells transfected with miR-629 inhibitor compared with cells exhibiting miR-629 downregulation (P<0.05; Fig. 5A). MTT and in vitro invasion assays revealed that RUNX3 knockdown rescued the effects of the miR-629 inhibitor on A549 and H460 cell viability (P<0.05; Fig. 5B and C) and invasion (P<0.05; Fig. 5D). In summary, our results suggested that miR-629 exerts oncogenic activity in NSCLC cells by regulating RUNX3 expression.

Discussion

Dysregulated miRNAs directly modulate the biological functions of NSCLC cells and contribute to the initiation and progression of NSCLC (3133); however, the specific roles and underlying mechanisms of the dysregulated miRNAs in NSCLC require further investigation. In the present study, it was reported that miR-629 expression was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissues and cell lines. High miR-629 expression levels were highly associated with the tumour size, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis of patients with NSCLC. miR-629 inhibition suppressed the viability and invasive ability of NSCLC cells. RUNX3 was confirmed as a direct target gene of miR-629 in NSCLC cells. In addition, RUNX3 overexpression exhibited similar effects of miR-629 inhibition in NSCLC cells. The rescue experiments demonstrated that RUNX3 knockdown abrogated the effects of miR-629 downregulation in NSCLC cells. In summary, miR-629 may exhibit oncogenic activity in NSCLC by directly targeting RUNX3. Therefore, miR-629 serves a pivotal role in NSCLC and may be an effective target for the therapy of patients with this disease.

miR-629 dysregulation has been observed in numerous types of human cancer (2123). For example, miR-629 expression is upregulated in breast cancer. Patients with breast cancer and levels of high miR-629 exhibit poorer overall survival and disease-free survival than those with low miR-629 expression (21). In addition, miR-629 was identified as an independent risk factor for lung metastasis of breast cancer (21). miR-629 is also highly expressed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (22), and cervical (23), ovarian (34) and pancreatic cancers (35). These findings indicate that miR-629 is frequently upregulated in human cancers and suggest that miR-629 may be identified as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for patients with these types of cancer.

miR-629 dysregulation is closely associated with the malignant phenotype of cancers. For instance, miR-629 downregulation attenuates cell viability and migration of breast cancer in vitro and decreases lung metastasis in vivo (21). Jingushi et al (22) reported that miR-629 downregulation inhibits cell migration and invasion of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Phuah et al (23) revealed that miR-629 knockdown prohibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis, and thus increases the sensitivity of cervical cancer cells to 1′S-1′-acetoxychavicol acetate. Shao et al (34) demonstrated that inhibiting miR-suppressed inhibited cell metastasis and induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer. Yan et al (35) reported that miR-629 inhibition supresses proliferation, while increasing the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells. These findings suggest that miR-629 may be considered as a therapeutic target in the treatment of patients with these specific types of cancer.

Numerous targets of miR-629 have been reported, including leukaemia inhibitory factor receptor (21) in breast cancer, tripartite motif-containing 33 (22) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, ras suppressor protein 1 (23) in cervical cancer, testis-specific Y-like protein 5 (34) in ovarian cancer and forkhead box O3 (35) in pancreatic cancer. Identifying the targets of miR-629 in NSCLC may improve understanding of the mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of NSCLC, which may facilitate the identification of valuable therapeutic targets of patients with NSCLC. RUNX3, which is located on chromosome 1p36, was identified as a direct target gene of miR-629 in NSCLC in the present study. RUNX3 was notably downregulated in NSCLC, which was reported in patients with poorly differentiated NSCLC. Additionally, patients with NSCLC and low RUNX3 expression levels demonstrated lower five-year survival rates than those with high expression (26). RUNX3 serves crucial roles in the oncogenesis and development of NSCLC by regulating cell proliferation (27), invasion (28), epithelial-mesenchymal transition (29) and tumorigenesis (30). In the present study, it was demonstrated that miR-629 directly targeted RUNX3 to inhibit the progression of NSCLC. Therefore, miR-629-based inhibition of RUNX3 may be a promising therapeutic method to treat patients with NSCLC.

In conclusion, miR-629 was overexpressed in NSCLC tissues and cell lines. High miR-629 expression levels were closely associated with tumour size, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis in patients with NSCLC. miR-629 served oncogenic roles in NSCLC by directly targeting RUNX3. The findings of the present study may provide novel evidence for the potential of miR-629 as a therapeutic target for NSCLC; however, the association between miR-629 and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC was not investigated. This limitation of our study may be resolved in future experiments.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Experiment research on Photodynamic therapy combined with Cisplatin treat central type lung cancer (grant no. 20154Y0156).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

BZ and YC made substantial contributions to the design of the present study and performed functional assays. The authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China), and was performed in accordance the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the use of their clinical tissues.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Nascimento AV, Bousbaa H, Ferreira D and Sarmento B: Non-small cell lung carcinoma: An overview on targeted therapy. Curr Drug Targets. 16:1448–1463. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Holdenrieder S and Stieber P: New challenges for laboratory diagnostics in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 6:119–121. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ramnath N, Dilling TJ, Harris LJ, Kim AW, Michaud GC, Balekian AA, Diekemper R, Detterbeck FC and Arenberg DA: Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 143 (Suppl 5):e314S–e340S. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ding X, Yang Y, Sun Y, Xu W, Su B and Zhou X: MicroRNA-585 acts as a tumor suppressor in non-small-cell lung cancer by targeting hSMG-1. Clin Transl Oncol. 19:546–552. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Liu X and Chen J: Advances in diagnosis and treatment and whole process management of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 37:1–4. 2015.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

7 

Rosell R and Karachaliou N: Lung cancer: Maintenance therapy and precision medicine in NSCLC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 10:549–550. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Schnabel PA and Junker K: Neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs. From small cell lung carcinoma to diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Pathologe. 35:557–564. 2014.(In German). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Li Z, Song Y, Liu L, Hou N, An X, Zhan D, Li Y, Zhou L, Li P, Yu L, et al: miR-199a impairs autophagy and induces cardiac hypertrophy through mTOR activation. Cell Death Differ. 24:1205–1213. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Mao M, Wu Z and Chen J: MicroRNA-187-5p suppresses cancer cell progression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through down-regulation of CYP1B1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 478:649–655. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Moretti F, D'Antona P, Finardi E, Barbetta M, Dominioni L, Poli A, Gini E, Noonan DM, Imperatori A, Rotolo N, et al: Systematic review and critique of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers of stage I–II non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 8:94980–94996. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Gompelmann D, Eberhardt R and Herth FJ: Advanced malignant lung disease: What the specialist can offer. Respiration. 82:111–123. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB and Bartel DP: Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 19:92–105. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Donadeu FX, Schauer SN and Sontakke SD: Involvement of miRNAs in ovarian follicular and luteal development. J Endocrinol. 215:323–334. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Liwak U, Faye MD and Holcik M: Translation control in apoptosis. Exp Oncol. 34:218–230. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Rutnam ZJ and Yang BB: The involvement of microRNAs in malignant transformation. Histol Histopathol. 27:1263–1270. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wang N and Zhang T: Down-regulation of microRNA-135 promotes sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer to gefitinib by targeting TRIM16. Oncol Res. 26:1005–1014. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Jin JJ, Liu YH, Si JM, Ni R and Wang J: Overexpression of miR-1290 contributes to cell proliferation and invasion of non small cell lung cancer by targeting interferon regulatory factor 2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 95:113–120. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Gao X, Li S, Li W, Wang G, Zhao W, Han J, Diao C, Wang X and Zhang M: MicroRNA-539 suppresses tumor cell growth by targeting the WNT8B gene in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cell Biochem. 120:2017.

20 

Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, Visone R, Iorio M, Roldo C, Ferracin M, et al: A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:2257–2261. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wang J, Song C, Tang H, Zhang C, Tang J, Li X, Chen B and Xie X: miR-629-3p may serve as a novel biomarker and potential therapeutic target for lung metastases of triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 19:722017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Jingushi K, Ueda Y, Kitae K, Hase H, Egawa H, Ohshio I, Kawakami R, Kashiwagi Y, Tsukada Y, Kobayashi T, et al: miR-629 targets TRIM33 to promote TGFbeta/Smad signaling and metastatic phenotypes in ccRCC. Mol Cancer Res. 13:565–574. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Phuah NH, Azmi MN, Awang K and Nagoor NH: Suppression of microRNA-629 enhances sensitivity of cervical cancer cells to 1′S-1′-acetoxychavicol acetate via regulating RSU1. Onco Targets Ther. 10:1695–1705. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hattori A, Takamochi K, Oh S and Suzuki K: New revisions and current issues in the eighth edition of the TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 49:3–11. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Araki K, Osaki M, Nagahama Y, Hiramatsu T, Nakamura H, Ohgi S and Ito H: Expression of RUNX3 protein in human lung adenocarcinoma: Implications for tumor progression and prognosis. Cancer Sci. 96:227–231. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Torshabi M, Faramarzi MA, Tabatabaei Yazdi M, Ostad SN and Gharemani MH: Runx3 expression inhibits proliferation and distinctly alters mRNA expression of bax in AGS and A549 cancer cells. Iran J Pharm Res. 10:355–361. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wang Y, Li Y, Wu B, Shi C and Li C: MicroRNA-661 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by directly targeting RUNX3. Mol Med Rep. 16:2113–2120. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Lee JM, Shin JO, Cho KW, Hosoya A, Cho SW, Lee YS, Ryoo HM, Bae SC and Jung HS: Runx3 is a crucial regulator of alveolar differentiation and lung tumorigenesis in mice. Differentiation. 81:261–268. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Lee KS, Lee YS, Lee JM, Ito K, Cinghu S, Kim JH, Jang JW, Li YH, Goh YM, Chi XZ, et al: Runx3 is required for the differentiation of lung epithelial cells and suppression of lung cancer. Oncogene. 29:3349–3361. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Cortinovis D, Monica V, Pietrantonio F, Ceresoli GL, La Spina CM and Wannesson L: MicroRNAs in non-small cell lung cancer: Current status and future therapeutic promises. Curr Pharm Des. 20:3982–3990. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Boeri M, Pastorino U and Sozzi G: Role of microRNAs in lung cancer: microRNA signatures in cancer prognosis. Cancer J. 18:268–274. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Vannini I, Fanini F and Fabbri M: MicroRNAs as lung cancer biomarkers and key players in lung carcinogenesis. Clin Biochem. 46:918–925. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Shao L, Shen Z, Qian H, Zhou S and Chen Y: Knockdown of miR-629 inhibits ovarian cancer malignant behaviors by targeting testis-specific Y-like protein 5. DNA Cell Biol. 36:1108–1116. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Yan H, Li Q, Wu J, Hu W, Jiang J, Shi L, Yang X, Zhu D, Ji M and Wu C: MiR-629 promotes human pancreatic cancer progression by targeting FOXO3. Cell Death Dis. 8:e31542017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2019
Volume 19 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhuang B and Zhuang B: MicroRNA‑629 inhibition suppresses the viability and invasion of non‑small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting RUNX3 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2023.12930. Mol Med Rep 19: 3933-3940, 2019
APA
Zhuang, B., & Zhuang, B. (2019). MicroRNA‑629 inhibition suppresses the viability and invasion of non‑small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting RUNX3 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2023.12930. Molecular Medicine Reports, 19, 3933-3940. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.9990
MLA
Zhuang, B., Cheng, Y."MicroRNA‑629 inhibition suppresses the viability and invasion of non‑small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting RUNX3 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2023.12930". Molecular Medicine Reports 19.5 (2019): 3933-3940.
Chicago
Zhuang, B., Cheng, Y."MicroRNA‑629 inhibition suppresses the viability and invasion of non‑small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting RUNX3 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2023.12930". Molecular Medicine Reports 19, no. 5 (2019): 3933-3940. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.9990