Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Oncology Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1021-335X Online ISSN: 1791-2431
Journal Cover
April-2018 Volume 39 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
April-2018 Volume 39 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article

The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs

  • Authors:
    • Yong Jin Oh
    • Sun You Park
    • Young Ho Seo
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: College of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, Daegu 704‑701, Republic of Korea
  • Pages: 1775-1782
    |
    Published online on: February 7, 2018
       https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6250
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are the most aggressive and metastatic subtype of breast cancers and exhibit poor clinical outcome due to the lack of drug target receptors such as estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2). The limited effectiveness of therapeutic options and the poor prognosis of TNBC patients emphasize the urgent need for identifying new therapeutic agents. In this regard, heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of TNBCs. Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone that regulates the folding, stability, and function of many oncogenic proteins. Hence, the inhibition of Hsp90 chaperone function leads to a simultaneous blockage of multiple signaling pathways in the proliferation and survival of cancers. In the present study, we performed the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of Hsp90 inhibitors and found that a synthetic small molecule, DPide exerted a potent anticancer activity against TNBC cell line, MDA‑MB‑231 and non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line, H1975 with GI50 values of 0.478 and 1.67 µM, respectively. Soft‑agar colony formation assay also revealed that DPide suppressed the anchorage‑independent growth of MDA‑MB‑231 cells. Western blot analysis indicated that the treatment of MDA‑MB‑231 cells with DPide induced the proteasomal degradation of EGFR, Her2, Met, Akt, c‑Raf, and Cdk4 and the consequent cleavage of PARP, leading to apoptotic cell death. DPide also inhibited the migration and MMP9 activity of MDA‑MB‑231 cells, suggesting that the metastatic potential of TNBCs could be suppressed by DPide. Collectively, DPide offers an effective therapeutic option for the treatment TNBCs.

Introduction

Breast cancers are the most malignant and leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide (1). Among all breast cancers, triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are the most aggressive, metastatic, and difficult to treat due to the lack of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) (2). Accordingly, TNBCs exhibit a poorer clinical outcome compared to other breast cancer subtypes (3). Moreover, the molecular heterogeneity of TNBC increases the difficulty in improving survival rates. Despite the development of hormonal and HER2-targeted therapies, patients with TNBC rarely respond to these therapeutic options (4,5). Thus, conventional chemotherapy such as the use of taxanes and anthracyclines still remains the mainstay for the treatment of TNBC patients (6,7). The poor prognosis of TNBC patients along with the limited effectiveness of therapeutic options necessitates the development of alternative therapeutic approaches for the treatment of TNBCs.

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a molecular chaperone that regulates the folding, stability, and function of its substrate proteins, referred to as ‘client’ proteins (8,9). These clients include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (Alk), mesenchymal-epidermal transition factor (Met), protein kinase B (Akt), cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (Cdk4), hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1α), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9). Consequently, inhibition of the Hsp90 protein induces the degradation of these oncogenic proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (10,11) and results in a simultaneous disruption of multiple signaling pathways in the proliferation and survival of cancers (12,13). Therefore, Hsp90 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of TNBCs (9).

Geldanamycin, a benzoquione ansamycin antibiotic was first identified as a natural product Hsp90 inhibitor in 1994 (14). Since then, numerous geldanamycin analogues such as 17-AAG, 17-DMAG, and IPI-504 were entered into clinical trials (15). Despite their clinical effects, geldanamycin analogues revealed several drawbacks in their clinical application such as formulation and toxicity issues (16). Hence, significant efforts have been directed towards improving drug-like properties and toxicities, resulting in diverse synthetic small molecule inhibitors. These Hsp90 inhibitors are divided into three major classes according to their core structures, purine, resorcinol, and benzamide. The purine class is designed by mimicking the ATP structure and includes PU-H71 (17), BIIB02 (18), and CUDC-305 (19) and the resorcinol class includes AT13387 (20), STA-9090 (21), and NVP-AUY922 (22). The benzamide class is another important class of Hsp90 inhibitors, including TAS-116 (23), XL888 (24), and SNX-5422 (25). Although a number of Hsp90 inhibitors have been entered into clinical trials, none of the Hsp90 inhibitors are clinically approved yet.

In our ongoing effort to develop potent Hsp90 inhibitors, we previously revealed that a small molecule, 6,7-dihydrothieno[3,2-c] pyridin-5(4H)-yl amide (DPide, 1) displays anticancer effects on cancer cells and this observation prompted us to direct our efforts toward evaluating the biological activity of DPide (1) and its analogue Oxo-DPide (2) against MDA-MB-231 TNBC cell line (26–28).

Materials and methods

Chemistry

All reagents and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), and used without further purification. All experiments dealing with moisture-sensitive compounds were carried out under an argon atmosphere. Concentration or solvent removal under reduced pressure was carried out using a rotary evaporator. Analytical thin layer chromatography was performed on precoated silica gel F254 TLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with visualization under UV light. Column chromatography was conducted under medium pressure on silica (Merck Silica Gel 40–63 µm) or performed using a Biotage SP1 flash purification system with prepacked silica gel cartrides (Biotage AB, Uppsala, Sweden). NMR analyses were carried out using a JNM-ECZ500R spectrometer (500 MHz) manufactured by JEOL, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (δ). The deuterium lock signal of the sample solvent was used as a reference, and coupling constants (J) were given in hertz (Hz). The splitting pattern abbreviations were as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; dd, doublet of doublets; m, multiplet. The purities of all final compounds were confirmed to be higher than 95% by analytical HPLC performed with a dual pump Shimadzu LC-6AD system equipped with a VP-ODS C18 column (4.6×250 mm, 5 µm; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).

Synthesis of 5-(2,4-Dihydroxy-5-isopropylbenzoyl)-5,6,7,7a-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridin-2(4H)-one (Oxo-Dpide, 2)

A mixture of compound 2 (0.20 g, 1.02 mmol), 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridin-2(4H)-one hydrochloride (0.29 ml, 1.53 mmol), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (0.39 g, 2.04 mmol), and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.36 ml, 2.04 mmol) in 4 ml of DMF was stirred under microwave irradiation at 80°C and 30 bar for 3 h. The mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by MPLC to afford Oxo-DPide (2) in 10% yield. Rf=0.19 (5:5 ethyl acetate: hexane). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.02 (s, 1H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 5.32 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.49–4.46 (m, 1H), 3.79 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (s, 1H), 3.25 (t, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.18–3.12 (m, 1H), 2.53–2.49 (m, 1H), 1.91–1.85 (m, 1H), 1.19 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 6H). ESI MS (m/e) 334.12 [M+1]+.

Cell culture & materials

H1975 cells (from the ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) (NSCLC) were grown in RPMI-1640 with L-glutamine supplemented with streptomycin (500 mg/ml), penicillin (100 U/ml), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Triple-negative breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 (from the ATCC) were grown in DMEM high glucose, supplemented with streptomycin (500 mg/ml), penicillin (100 U/ml), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were grown to confluence at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. DPide was prepared following a previously reported procedure (26). For in vitro studies, DPide and geldanamycin (Alexis Biochemicals; Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA) were dissolved in DMSO. Antibodies for EGFR (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human mAb; cat. no. 4267) Her2 (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human mAb; cat. no. 2165), Met (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human mAb; cat no. 8198), Akt (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human pAb; cat. no. 9272) c-Raf (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human pAb; cat. no. 9422), Cdk4 (1:1,000; mouse anti-human mAb; cat. no. 2906), Hsp90 (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human pAb; cat. no. 4874), Hsp70 (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human pAb; cat. no. 4872), PARP (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human pAb; cat. no. 9542) and β-actin (1:1,000; rabbit anti-human mAb; cat. no. 4970) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-mouse (1:5,000; goat anti-mouse pAb; cat. no. sc-2005) and anti-rabbit antibodies (1:5,000; goat anti-rabbit pAb; cat. no. sc-2004) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA).

Cell proliferation assay

H1975 cells (2×103 cells/well) were seeded in a 96-well plate. The medium volume was brought to 100 µl, and the cells were allowed to attach for 14 h. The cells were then incubated with DPide or Oxo-DPide (0.01, 0.1, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 30, 50, 70 and 100 µM) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 3 days. MDA-MB-231 cells (2×103 cells/well) were seeded in a 96-well plate, the medium volume was brought to 100 µl, and the cells were allowed to attach for 14 h. The cells were then incubated with DPide (0.01, 0.1, 1 and 5 µM) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 1, 2, and 3 days. CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution reagent (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) was added into each well following the manufacturer's instructions. The absorbance at 490 nm was read on the Tecan Infinite F200 Pro plate reader, and values were expressed as the percentage of the absorbance from cells incubated in DMSO alone.

Western blotting

After being treated with DPide (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 µM) or GA (1 µM) for 24 h, MDA-MB-231 cells were harvested and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The 30 µg of lysate per lane was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). After being blocked with 5% skim milk in TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T), the membrane was incubated with the corresponding antibodies in TBS-T at 4°C overnight. The proteins were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PΑ, USA).

Reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)

RT-PCR was performed using the RT-PCR kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories) following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA), reverse transcribed, and then subjected to PCR. The following primers were used for the amplification of human Met, Akt, Cdk4, Hsp90 and β-actin: Met, 5′-AAGAGGGCATTTTGGTTGTG-3′ (forward) and 3′-GATGATTCCCTCGGTCAGAA-5′ (reverse); Akt, 5′-TTTTATTTCTCGGGTGCAT-3′ (forward) and 3′-CATTTCCCTACGTGAATCGG-5′ (reverse); Cdk4, 5′-CCGAAGTTCTTCTGCAGTCC (forward) and 3′-AGGCAGAGATTCGCTTGTGT (reverse); Hsp90, 5′-GAGCAGTACGCTTGGGAGTC (forward) and 3′-CCAGATGGGCTTTGTTTTGT (reverse); β-actin, 5′-AGAAAATCTGGCACCACACC-3′ (forward) and 3′-CCATCTCTTGCTCGAAGTCC-5′ (reverse).

Colony formation assay

MDA-MB-231 cells (1×105 cells/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate and treated with DPide (0.1 and 0.5 µM) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 21 days. After treatment, the medium removed and stained with 0.1% of crystal violet in 10% ethanol at room temperature for 30 min. The image was acquired with an inverted phase contrast microscope (Olympus, Japan) using a 100X objective.

Wound healing assay

MDA-MB-231 cells (2×105 cells/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate, and the cells were allowed to attach for 24 h. The 80% confluent cells were wounded with a linear scratch using a disposable 200-µl micropipette tip. The cells were washed with medium to remove cell debris and covered with serum free medium containing DPide (0.1 and 0.5 µm or GA (1 µm). After being incubated for 24 h, the migrated cells were determined under an inverted phase contrast microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using a 100X objective.

Gelatin zymography assay

MDA-MB-231 (5×105 cells/well) cells were seeded in a 6-well culture plate and treated with DPide (0.05, 0.5, and 1 µm or GA (1 µm) for 24 h. Supernatants were collected and loaded on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel with gelatin (0.2 mg/ml). Following electrophoresis, the gels were washed for 40 min in 2.5% Triton X-100. After washing with deionized water, the gels were incubated for an additional for 72 h at 37°C in incubation buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.05% sodium azide, pH 7.8). The gel was stained with staining solution (1% Commassie Brilliant Blue G-250, 5% MeOH, 10% acetic acid). The number of pixels per band was used to determine the enzyme activity in each group. The gelatin zymography experiment was repeated three times with independent samples.

Fluorescence polarization (FP) assay

All fluorescence polarization experiments were conducted in 96-well, black, round-bottom plates using a microplate reader. For FP assay experiments, to each well, HFB buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Na2MoO4, 0.01% NP-40), 30 nM recombinant Hsp90α full length protein, 5 nM fluorescein isothiocyanate labeled geldanamycin (GA-FITC) inhibitor, 0.1 mg/ml bovine globulin (BGG), 2 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT) and inhibitors (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM) were added. All wells had a final volume of 100 µl in the HFB buffer. The plates were incubated at 4°C for 14 h. The polarization values in millipolarization units (mP) were assessed at an excitation wavelength at 495 nm and an emission wavelength at 530 nm. All experimental data were analyzed using Prism software (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Molecular modeling

In silico docking of Oxi-DPide (1) or Oxi-DPide (2) with the 3D coordinates of the X-ray crystal structures of the N-terminal domain of human Hsp90α (PDB code: 2XJX) was accomplished using the AutoDock program downloaded from the Molecular Graphics Laboratory of the Scripps Research Institute (La Jolla, CA, USA). In the docking experiments carried out, Gasteiger charges were placed on the X-ray structures of the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 along with Oxi-DPide (1) or Oxi-DPide (2) using tools from the AutoDock suite. A grid box centered on the N-terminal Hsp90 domain with definitions of 60×60×60 points and 0.375 Å spacing was chosen for ligand docking experiments. The docking parameters consisted of setting the population size to 150, the number of generations to 27,000, and the number of evaluations to 25,000,000, while the number of docking runs was set to 100 with a cutoff of 1 Å for the root-mean-square tolerance for the grouping of each docking run. The docking model of human Hsp90α with Oxi-DPide (1) or Oxi-DPide (2) are depicted in Fig. 1 and the images were generated using PyMol1.3 (DeLano Scientific LLC, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Figure 1.

Molecular docking model of (A) DPide and (B) Oxo-DPide bound in the ATP-binding pocket of human Hsp90 (PDB code: 2XJX). The carbon atoms of DPide (1) and Oxo-DPide (2) are shown in pink and green, respectively. The oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur atoms are shown in red, blue, and yellow, respectively. The side chains of the binding site are labeled with their residue name, the water molecules are shown as red spheres, and the hydrogen bonds are shown as red dashed lines. The docking poses of DPide (1) and Oxo-DPide (2) are visualized using PyMOL1.3.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the Student's t-test (two-tailed) using Prism GraphPad software. Differences with *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 were considered statistically significant. Data were represented as the mean ± SD.

Results

Molecular docking and drug design

Our previous study indicated that DPide (1) strongly bound to the ATP-binding pocket in the N-terminal domain of Hsp90α (Fig. 1A) (26). The resorcinol ring and the carbonyl group of DPide (1) formed the hydrogen bonding interactions with Asp93, Thr184, and conserved water molecules, while the isopropyl group of DPide (1) was imbedded into the hydrophobic cavity formed by Leu107, Phe138, and Val186. The 6,7-dihydrothieno[3,2-c] pyridine-5(4H)-yl moiety of DPide (1) was nicely positioned in the entry region composed of Asp54, Ala55, and Ile96. The docking pose of DPide (1) suggested that installing a carbonyl group on DPide (1) may form an additional hydrogen bonding interaction with the carboxylic acid side chain of Asp54. Therefore, we rationally designed Oxo-DPide (2) having an extra carbonyl group adjacent to the sulfur atom and performed the docking simulation shown in Fig. 1B. To experimentally examine whether Oxo-DPide (2) can form an additional hydrogen bonding interaction with the carboxylic acid side chain of Asp54, we first commenced the synthesis of DPide (1) and Oxo-DPide (2).

Chemistry

DPide (1) was synthesized following a previously reported procedure (Fig. 2) (26). Briefly, the amide coupling reaction of carboxylic acid 3 with 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridine (4) using EDC afforded DPide (1) in 52% yield. Similarly, Oxo-DPide (2) was obtained by the reaction of carboxylic acid 3 with commercially available compound 5 using EDC, HOBt, and DIPEA in DMF under microwave irradiation at 80°C for 3 h in 10% yield.

Figure 2.

Synthesis of DPide (1) and Oxo-DPide (2).

Comparative Hsp90 binding affinity and anti-proliferative activity of DPide and Oxo-DPide

With DPide and Oxo-DPide in hand, we first assessed the direct binding affinity of DPide and Oxo-DPide to human Hsp90α with a fluorescence piolarization (FP) assay in which FITC-labeled geldanamycin was used as a fluorescence probe. As shown in Fig. 3A and Table I, DPide directly bound to the ATP-binding pocket of Hsp90α with an IC50 value of 33.3 nM, which was more potent than Oxo-DPide (IC50=73.7 nM). We next explored the anti-proliferative effect of DPide and Oxo-DPide on H1975 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines. Consistent with the result from the FP assay, DPide displayed very potent anti-proliferative activity against H1975 and MDA-MB-231 cells with GI50 values of 0.478 and 1.67 µM respectively, while Oxo-DPide exerted less efficient potency against H1975 and MDA-MB-231 cells with GI50 values of 20.7 and 35.8 µM (Fig. 3B and Table I). Due to the higher potency of DPide than Oxo-DPide towards Hsp90α as well as the two cancer cell lines, we decided to further investigate the biological activity of DPide but not Oxo-DPide against TNBCs.

Figure 3.

Comparative in vitro assays of DPide and Oxo-DPide. (A) Binding affinity to the ATP-binding pocket of Hsp90α was determined using a fluorescence polarization (FP) assay after being incubated for 14 h. (B) Anti-proliferative effect of DPide and Oxo-DPide on H1975 non-small cell lung cancer cells (NSCLC). Cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of DPide and Oxo-DPide for 3 days and cell viability was assessed by MTS assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=4).

Table I.

Inhibitory activity against Hsp90α and H1975 cancer cells.

Table I.

Inhibitory activity against Hsp90α and H1975 cancer cells.

CompoundHsp90α (FP)a (IC50; nM)H1975b (GI50; µM) MDA-MB-231b (GI50; µM)
DPide (1)33.30.4781.67
Oxo-DPide (2)73.720.735.8

a Binding to N-terminal domain of Hsp90α was determined by a fluorescence polarization (FP) assay.

b GI50 values were obtained after the treatment of cells for 72 h.

DPide significantly inhibits the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells

To examine the anticancer activity of DPide against MDA-MB-231 cells, we first evaluated the dose- and time-dependent effect of DPide on the growth of MDA-MB-231 cells. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with DPide at various concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 µM) for 1, 2, and 3 days and the cell viability was determined using an MTS assay (Fig. 4A). The cell viability assay revealed that DPide afforded very potent cellular efficacy against MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Notably, the exposure of cells with DPide (0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 µM) for 1 day displayed only a minimal effect on cell viability.

Figure 4.

DPide inhibits the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Dose- and time-dependent effect of DPide on the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of DPide for 1, 2, and 3 days and cell viability was assessed by MTS assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=4); *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 represent significant differences compared with the DMSO control. (B) Colony forming capability was determined by colony formation assay in MDA-MB-231 cells after being treated with the indicated concentrations of DPide for 3 weeks.

Anchorage-independent cell growth is a hallmark of oncogenic transformation and considered as a key metastatic potential for malignant cancer cells to proliferate away from their site of origin. Accordingly, we investigated the effect of DPide on the anchorage-independent cell growth and the soft-agar colony formation assay revealed that the treatment of cells with 0.5 µM DPide inhibited the anchorage-independent growth of MDA-MB-231 cells, indicating that the metastatic potential of MDA-MB-231 cells could be suppressed by DPide (Fig. 4B).

DPide inhibits the chaperone function of Hsp90 and downregulated Hsp90 client proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway

To uncover the underlying mechanism of DPide, we next analyzed the effect of DPide on the expression of Hsp90 client proteins in MDA-MB-231 cells. Hsp90 is well-known for maintaining the stability of EGFR, Her2, Met, Akt, c-Raf, and Cdk4. Thus, the inhibition of Hsp90 results in the degradation of these client proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. As shown Fig. 5A, the exposure of cells to DPide induced a significant reduction of EGFR, Her2, Met, Akt, c-Raf, and Cdk4 in a dose-dependent manner, consequently leading to the cleavage of PARP. In contrast, DPide increased the cellular level of Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins, upregulation of which is a cellular hallmark of Hsp90 inhibition. The expression of non-Hsp90-dependent protein, β-actin, remained unchanged as expected. To further clarify the mechanism of DPide in detail, we next assessed the mRNA levels of Met, Akt, Cdk4, and Hsp90 by semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 5B). As expected, DPide did not significantly alter the mRNA levels of Met, Akt, and Cdk4, indicating that the downregulation of those protein levels occurred via proteasomal degradation but not transcriptional regulation. In contrast, DPide treatment increased the mRNA level of Hsp90 in a dose-dependent manner, in that inhibition of Hsp90 chaperone function by DPide induced proteotoxic stress, activated HSF1, and transcriptionally expressed chaperone proteins such as Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp47, and Hsp27 by feedback mechanism (29). Collectively, these results demonstrated that DPide inhibited the chaperone function of Hsp90 and downregulated Hsp90 client proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway.

Figure 5.

DPide inhibits the chaperone function of Hsp90 and induces the degradation of client proteins. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of DPide for 24 h and the expression of EGFR, Her2, Met, Akt, c-Raf, Cdk4, PARP, Cleaved PARP, Hsp70, Hsp90, and β-actin was analyzed using western blotting. Geldanamycin (GA, 1 µM) and DMSO (D, 0.5%) were employed as a positive and a negative control, respectively. (B) Effect of DPide on the transcriptional levels of Met, Akt, Cdk4, and Hsp90 were assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of DPide for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated from the cells, reverse-transcribed to cDNA, and then assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Geldanamycin (GA, 1 µM) and DMSO (D, 0.5%) were employed as a positive and a negative control, respectively.

DPide inhibits the migration and MMP9 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells

MDA-MB-231 cells have a mesenchymal phenotype and are highly aggressive metastatic breast cancer cells. An increase of mobility has been associated with the metastatic potential of cancer cells. To explore the anti-metastatic activity of DPide, we next examined the effect of DPide on the mobility of MDA-MB-231 cells. Wounds were first formed by scratching the cell monolayer with a pipette tip and wound closure of MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence or absence of DPide was assessed by counting the number of cells that had infiltrated the wounded area after 24 h. As shown in Fig. 6A, treatment of cells with 0.1 and 0.5 µM of DPide for 24 h significantly inhibited the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the DMSO control. Thus, the in vitro wound-healing migration assay revealed that DPide inhibited the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Figure 6.

DPide impairs the cell migration and MMP9 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Effect of DPide on the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells. After being scratched, MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of DPide for 24 h. Images of the wounded monolayer were captured at 0 and 24 h. (B) MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of DPide for 24 h and the proteolytic activity of MMP9 was determined by gelatin zymography assay. (C) Bar graphs represent the relative MMP9 activity. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=3); *P<0.05, **P<0.01 represent a significant difference compared with the DMSO control.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a group of zinc-dependent proteases that are involved in the degradation and remodelling of the extracellular matrix (ECM). By degrading the matrix, MMPs provide physical space within the matrix for tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. It has been reported that MMP9 is secreted by various types of malignant cancer cells and contributes to cancer metastasis by breaking down various EMC molecules, which allows metastatic cancer cells to be more invasive (30). Therefore, we next investigated the effect of DPide on MMP9 activity by performing gelatin zymography. As shown in Fig. 6B and C, DPide significantly suppressed MMP9 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment of cells with 0.05, 0.5, and 1 µM of DPide decreased MMP9 activity by 14, 42, and 43%, compared to DMSO control, respectively. Collectively the results clearly indicated that DPide inhibited the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells and suppressed MMP9 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Discussion

In the present study, the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of Hsp90 inhibitors DPide and Oxo-DPide were described. Our results demonstrated that DPide more strongly bound to the N-terminal domain of Hsp90α (IC50=33.3 nM) than Oxo-DPide (IC50=73.7 nM) in the FP assay. Moreover, the FP enzyme affinity of DPide agreeably translated into satisfactory cellular activity with GI50 values of 0.478 and 1.67 µM against H1975 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. In contrast, Oxo-DPide inhibited the proliferation of H1975 and MDA-MB-231 cells with GI50 values of 20.7 and 35.8 µM, respectively. The treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with DPide led to the degradation of EGFR, Her2, Met, Akt, c-Raf, and Cdk4 and the consequent cleavage of PARP in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with DPide upregulated the protein level of Hsp70 and Hsp90. RT-PCR experiments revealed that the exposure of MDA-MB-231 cells with DPide did not alter the mRNA levels of Met, Akt, and Cdk4, suggesting that the downregulation of Hsp90 client proteins was associated with proteasomal degradation but not transcriptional downregulation. DPide efficiently suppressed the migration and MMP9 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Overall, these findings strongly support that a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the Bisa Research Grant of Keimyung University in 2015.

Competing interests

The authors declare thay they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Anders C and Carey LA: Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 22:1233–1243. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Yadav BS, Sharma SC, Chanana P and Jhamb S: Systemic treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 5:125–133. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Gajria D and Chandarlapaty S: HER2-amplified breast cancer: Mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and novel targeted therapies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 11:263–275. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Garcia-Becerra R, Santos N, Diaz L and Camacho J: Mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: Focus on signaling pathways, miRNAs and genetically based resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 14:108–145. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Cyr A, Elias AD, Farrar WB, Forero A, Giordano SH, et al: NCCN guidelines insights breast cancer, version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 13:1475–1485. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Schiff R, Massarweh S, Shou J and Osborne CK: Breast cancer endocrine resistance: How growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators modulate response. Clin Cancer Res. 9:447S–454S. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Sankhala KK, Mita MM, Mita AC and Takimoto CH: Heat shock proteins: A potential anticancer target. Curr Drug Targets. 12:2001–2008. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Whitesell L and Lindquist SL: HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 5:761–772. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

da Silva VC and Ramos CH: The network interaction of the human cytosolic 90 kDa heat shock protein Hsp90: A target for cancer therapeutics. J Proteomics. 75:2790–2802. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zhang H and Burrows F: Targeting multiple signal transduction pathways through inhibition of Hsp90. J Mol Med (Berl). 82:488–499. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Chiosis G, Vilenchik M, Kim J and Solit D: Hsp90: The vulnerable chaperone. Drug Discov Today. 9:881–888. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Mosser DD and Morimoto RI: Molecular chaperones and the stress of oncogenesis. Oncogene. 23:2907–2918. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Whitesell L, Mimnaugh EG, De Costa B, Myers CE and Neckers LM: Inhibition of heat shock protein HSP90-pp60v-src heteroprotein complex formation by benzoquinone ansamycins: Essential role for stress proteins in oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:pp. 8324–8328. 1994; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Trepel J, Mollapour M, Giaccone G and Neckers L: Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 10:537–549. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Supko JG, Hickman RL, Grever MR and Malspeis L: Preclinical pharmacologic evaluation of geldanamycin as an antitumor agent. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 36:305–315. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Caldas-Lopes E, Cerchietti L, Ahn JH, Clement CC, Robles AI, Rodina A, Moulick K, Taldone T, Gozman A, Guo Y, et al: Hsp90 inhibitor PU-H71, a multimodal inhibitor of malignancy, induces complete responses in triple-negative breast cancer models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:pp. 8368–8373. 2009; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Lundgren K, Zhang H, Brekken J, Huser N, Powell RE, Timple N, Busch DJ, Neely L, Sensintaffar JL, Yang YC, et al: BIIB021, an orally available, fully synthetic small-molecule inhibitor of the heat shock protein Hsp90. Mol Cancer Ther. 8:921–929. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Bao R, Lai CJ, Wang DG, Qu H, Yin L, Zifcak B, Tao X, Wang J, Atoyan R, Samson M, et al: Targeting heat shock protein 90 with CUDC-305 overcomes erlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 8:3296–3306. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Woodhead AJ, Angove H, Carr MG, Chessari G, Congreve M, Coyle JE, Cosme J, Graham B, Day PJ, Downham R, et al: Discovery of (2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-[5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dihydrois oindol-2-yl]methanone (AT13387), a novel inhibitor of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 by fragment based drug design. J Med Chem. 53:5956–5969. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wang Y, Trepel JB, Neckers LM and Giaccone G: STA-9090, a small-molecule Hsp90 inhibitor for the potential treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 11:1466–1476. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Eccles SA, Massey A, Raynaud FI, Sharp SY, Box G, Valenti M, Patterson L, de Haven Brandon A, Gowan S, Boxall F, et al: NVP-AUY922: A novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor active against xenograft tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Cancer Res. 68:2850–2860. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Ohkubo S, Kodama Y, Muraoka H, Hitotsumachi H, Yoshimura C, Kitade M, Hashimoto A, Ito K, Gomori A, Takahashi K, et al: TAS-116, a highly selective inhibitor of heat shock protein 90α and β, demonstrates potent antitumor activity and minimal ocular toxicity in preclinical models. Mol Cancer Ther. 14:14–22. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Bussenius J, Blazey CM, Aay N, Anand NK, Arcalas A, Baik T, Bowles OJ, Buhr CA, Costanzo S, Curtis JK, et al: Discovery of XL888: A novel tropane-derived small molecule inhibitor of HSP90. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 22:5396–5404. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Infante JR, Weiss GJ, Jones S, Tibes R, Bauer TM, Bendell JC, Hinson JM Jr, Von Hoff DD, Burris HA III, Orlemans EO and Ramanathan RK: Phase I dose-escalation studies of SNX-5422, an orally bioavailable heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 50:2897–2904. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Jeong JH, Oh YJ, Lho Y, Park SY, Liu KH, Ha E and Seo YH: Targeting the entry region of Hsp90's ATP binding pocket with a novel 6,7-dihydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridin-5(4H)-yl amide. Eur J Med Chem. 124:1069–1080. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Jeong CH, Park HB, Jang WJ, Jung SH and Seo YH: Discovery of hybrid Hsp90 inhibitors and their anti-neoplastic effects against gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 24:224–227. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Jeong JH, Oh YJ, Kwon TK and Seo YH: Chalcone-templated Hsp90 inhibitors and their effects on gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Arch Pharm Res. 40:96–105. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Dai C and Sampson SB: HSF1: Guardian of proteostasis in cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 26:17–28. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Dechow TN, Pedranzini L, Leitch A, Leslie K, Gerald WL, Linkov I and Bromberg JF: Requirement of matrix metalloproteinase-9 for the transformation of human mammary epithelial cells by Stat3-C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:pp. 10602–10607. 2004; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Oh YJ, Park SY and Seo YH: The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs. Oncol Rep 39: 1775-1782, 2018.
APA
Oh, Y.J., Park, S.Y., & Seo, Y.H. (2018). The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs. Oncology Reports, 39, 1775-1782. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6250
MLA
Oh, Y. J., Park, S. Y., Seo, Y. H."The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs". Oncology Reports 39.4 (2018): 1775-1782.
Chicago
Oh, Y. J., Park, S. Y., Seo, Y. H."The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs". Oncology Reports 39, no. 4 (2018): 1775-1782. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6250
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Oh YJ, Park SY and Seo YH: The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs. Oncol Rep 39: 1775-1782, 2018.
APA
Oh, Y.J., Park, S.Y., & Seo, Y.H. (2018). The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs. Oncology Reports, 39, 1775-1782. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6250
MLA
Oh, Y. J., Park, S. Y., Seo, Y. H."The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs". Oncology Reports 39.4 (2018): 1775-1782.
Chicago
Oh, Y. J., Park, S. Y., Seo, Y. H."The targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by a synthetic small molecule, DPide offers an effective treatment strategy against TNBCs". Oncology Reports 39, no. 4 (2018): 1775-1782. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6250
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team