Identification and validation of alternative splicing isoforms as novel biomarker candidates in hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Peng Wu
    • Donghu Zhou
    • Yuqian Wang
    • Weiran Lin
    • Aihua Sun
    • Handong Wei
    • Yi Fang
    • Xianling Cong
    • Ying Jiang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 21, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6947
  • Pages: 1929-1937
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) is a transcriptional regulation mechanism that participates in multiple aspects of cancer. The present study aimed to identify differential AS events from tumor and non‑tumor samples and investigate the potential of AS as a source of candidate cancer diagnostic biomarkers. Deep RNA sequencing of three paired hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and adjacent non‑tumors was applied to identify AS events. RT‑qPCR was performed on 45 HCC clinical samples to validate the splicing differences. The maximal information coefficient was first used to build an association between clinical features and AS changes. We identified 197 significantly differential skipped exon events, of which only 29% overlapped with the differentially expressed genes. The differentially spliced genes were mainly enriched in HCC‑characterized biological processes and pathways, clearly separating tumors from non‑tumors. We also validated the statistically significant splicing differences of three AS candidates (CEACAM1 exon 7, VPS29 exon 2 and ISOC2 exon 3). Furthermore, a clinicopathological analysis revealed that carcinoembryonic antigen‑related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) exon 7 was significantly correlated with the survival time, and VPS29 exon 2 was associated with cell differentiation stages. In conclusion, the findings of the three AS candidates in the present study could be beneficial in HCC prognosis and new treatment strategies.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide due to its aggressive properties and limited therapeutic options. Thus, one important aim of the present study was to identify biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response and prognosis, which may provide a deeper understanding of the tumor biology (1,2). To date, numerous molecular events, including those at the epigenetic, pre-transcriptional, transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels, have been identified and validated as important prognostic biomarkers (3), such as the Ki-67 protein and TP53 gene mutations. However, the functional significance of cancer-specific alternative splicing (AS) events is largely unexplored. AS of pre-mRNA enables a gene to produce multiple protein isoforms, usually with distinct functions. This mechanism generates transcriptomic and proteomic diversity in different tissues and cell types (4,5), however, in some disease states, for example in cancerous conditions, the damaged or diseased cells take this advantage to produce aberrant protein isoforms that contribute to tumorigenesis (6).

In the last decade, growing data has indicated that the dysregulation of AS is a crucial event in carcinogenesis and tumor progression (3,79). Genes with aberrant AS events are involved in almost every aspect of cancer, including proliferation, differentiation, cell cycle control, metabolism, apoptosis, motility, invasion and angiogenesis (10). Although several studies have revealed multiple tumor-associated AS variants in a wide variety of cancers (1014), there is still much research to be conducted at the splicing level in HCC. In HCC, various aberrant AS events were found to promote the generation of oncogenic isoforms, whereas tumor suppressors were self-inactivated by aberrant AS (15). As a result, the identification and validation of isoforms as novel biomarkers at the splicing level in HCC may be of great significance for revealing novel drug targets for therapeutic intervention.

In the present study, we analyzed the published RNA-Seq datasets of three paired HCC and adjacent non-tumor tissues and summarized the aberrant gene expression and splicing patterns in HCC samples. We focused on the putative novel biomarkers of these three aberrant AS events in HCC, and their association with clinical features and prognosis was further investigated.

Materials and methods

RNA-Seq data download and processing

The RNA-Seq data of three paired HCC patients were downloaded from NCBI GEO database with the accession number of GSE33294 (16). Read alignment was performed using TopHat2 (17) with the known reference genes from the GENCODE v22 annotation (http://www.gencodegenes.org/human/release_22.html). Gene expression was analyzed using Cufflinks v2.2.1 (http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/cufflinks/) and significantly differential genes were identified by the Cuffdiff module at the FDR of 5% (18). Alternative splicing analysis was carried out using the MATS software v3.0.8 (http://rnaseq-mats.sourceforge.net/) with the parameters of ‘-t single-len 58 -a 8 -c 0.0001 -analysis U’. Only the significantly differential events of the SE type were used for subsequent analysis.

Clinical samples and ethical statement

Forty-five paired tumor and normal liver tissues from HCC patients, with an average age of 45 years old, including 28 males and 17 females, were collected from April 2010 to June 2014 at the China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University. All patients consented to the use of their clinical specimens for medical and biological study. The present study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University (2015-wjw002).

RT-qPCR validation and inclusion level (IL) calculation

Fresh samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and total RNA was extracted using a TRIzol Isolation kit. cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan). RT-PCR was performed on the Illumina ECO system (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). ILs of skipped exons in every clinical sample were estimated by the ΔΔCq approach (19). Each splicing event used two paired primers, one representing the inclusion isoform expression and the other representing the total expression. The inclusion ratio was calculated using the following equation: IL=2-(Inclusion ΔCT−TotalΔCT). Thus, the ‘InclusionΔCT-TotalΔCT’ was used to denote the IL of each skipped exon.

Association analysis between AS and clinical features

Clinical features for the association analysis included age, sex, viral status, cell differentiation, tumor size, vascular invasion, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, metastasis and recurrence, all of which were converted to the quantitative data. The correlation between these quantitative clinical features and splicing changes was calculated using the maximal information coefficient (MIC) in the MINE toolkit (20) with the parameter of ‘-allPairs’. The confidence for various MIC values was evaluated by the P-value table at the sample size of 45.

Statistical analysis and visualization

Heatmaps of expression and splicing were plotted by the ‘pheatmap’ package in R language with the parameter of ‘scale’=‘row’. Three DS genes were visualized using the sashimi plotting function in IGV software (21). Student's t-test was used in the differential analysis of RT-PCR values using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Fisher's exact test was applied to the association test of contingency table analysis. The network of AS and clinical features was visualized using Cytoscape software v3.3.0 (http://cytoscape.org). Enrichment analysis was performed using the ‘ClusterProfiler’ package (22) in R language.

Results

Comparison between gene expression and splicing profiles of HCC

We reanalyzed the RNA-Seq datasets from three previously published paired HCC tumors and adjacent non-tumor tissues (16). After reads alignment and expression quantification, a total of 13,327 protein-coding genes were identified with FPKM≥1. Of these, we detected 1,246 upregulated genes and 1,197 downregulated genes in the HCC group at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5% using the Cufflinks software (18). The expression pattern for these differentially expressed (DE) genes in three paired samples is presented in Fig. 1A, and it was revealed that the non-tumor and tumor samples were clearly separated and the size of upregulated and downregulated gene clusters were nearly equal. Additionally, there were similar expression patterns between three samples in the same group of tumor or non-tumor samples.

Besides gene expression changes, AS, as an important post-transcriptional modification, also caused differences between tumor and non-tumor tissues. The splicing differences were analyzed using MATS (23,24) for five common splicing types, including skipped exon (SE), retained intron (RI), mutually exclusive exons (MXEs), alternative 5′splice site (A5SS), and alternative 3′splice site (A3SS). The most frequent splicing type was the SE type, which had 197 splicing events with statistically significant differences. The percent-spliced-in (PSI) value, representing the fraction of the exon-inclusion variant, was used to estimate the splicing level. As in the expression patterns of DE genes, the hierarchical clustering for PSIs of differential skipped exons still illustrated the separation between the tumor and non-tumor samples (Fig. 1B). However, PSI-decreased exons were obviously more than PSI-increased exons, suggesting that HCC broke the splicing balance of exon inclusion and exclusion on the whole. The differentially spliced (DS) genes were fewer in number than the DE genes, and only 29% of the former overlapped with the latter (Fig. 1C). Moreover, the splicing specificity of samples also existed in the same group. These splicing-changed genes in HCC revealed a new layer of regulation in liver carcinogenesis.

Function and pathway enrichment of DE and DS genes

Next, an enrichment analysis was performed on DE and DS genes between HCC tumor and non-tumor samples to observe whether the splicing-induced changes were clustered in the main functions and processes of the liver and liver cancer. Top differentially-enriched terms of biological processes (P<0.05) between DE and DS genes are presented in Fig. 2A. It was revealed that the DE gene-specific-enriched terms included carboxylic acid catabolic process and cellular amino acid catabolic process. DS genes were primarily enriched in Gene Ontology (http://geneontology.org) terms involving acute-phase response, platelet degranulation and acute inflammatory response, which were identical to the core roles of the liver in immunological effects. Similarly, enrichment analysis of the KEGG pathway (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html) revealed the enriched pathways of liver characteristics, such as cytochrome P450 metabolism, and complement and coagulation cascades in DS genes (Fig. 2B). These results indicated that the DS genes reflected the important functions and processes of the liver even though they were far fewer than the DE genes.

Clinical sample validation for AS isoforms as novel candidate biomarkers

As aforementioned, the splicing changes were indispensable for investigating the differences between HCC tumors and non-tumors as well as exploring HCC biomarkers. Among the 197 DS events, we chose three AS events from both the PSI values and the functional importance of the related genes to validate their potential as novel splicing biomarkers in HCC. Reads alignments and coverages in three paired samples illustrated the splicing junctions of these three DS events (Fig. 3). We found that exon 7 of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) and exon 2 of VPS29 revealed an increase in exon inclusion in HCC samples. CEACAM1 encodes carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1, and the isoform with exon 7 inclusion is the longest transcript of CEACAM1 and plays a role as a co-inhibitory receptor in the immune response (25). VPS29 is a vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein and the exon 2-included isoform adds four amino acids to the protein initiation position. Moreover, exon 3 of ISOC2 revealed an increase in exon exclusion in HCC samples, the exclusion of which can alter the core isochorismatase domain of ISOC2.

Although the splicing differences were identified by mRNA sequencing from only three paired samples, a large number of samples were employed to strictly validate the possibilities of splicing isoforms as biomarkers of HCC. The exon inclusion level (IL) differences were assessed by RT-qPCR in a total of 45 paired HCC tumor and adjacent non-tumor samples (Fig. 4). The ΔΔCq values of DS exons were significantly different between tumor and non-tumor tissues (P<0.01) and the splicing variation tendency was the same as the evidence from the RNA sequencing analysis. These splicing switches were expected to be closely associated with HCC pathology.

Association of DS with clinical features of HCC

Clinicopathological analysis of the three DS genes in 45 HCC patients was performed to evaluate which features were significantly associated with splicing switching. Contingency table analysis and Fisher's exact test revealed that the exon 7 IL of CEACAM1 was significantly associated with the viral status of clinical samples (Table I and Fig. 5A). HBV-/HCV-infected patients were more likely to express the isoform with exon 7 inclusion. The difference test also represented the significant difference of ΔIL, that is IL(tumor)-IL(non-tumor), between the HBV-/HCV- and non-infected patients (Fig. 5B).

Table I.

Contingency table analysis of CEACAM1, VPS29 and ISOC2 splicing changes.

Table I.

Contingency table analysis of CEACAM1, VPS29 and ISOC2 splicing changes.

CEACAM1ISOC2VPS29



Clinical featuresNumber+P-value+P-value+P-value
Age (years)
  >50252320.63786180.26962221
  ≤5020163 217 182
Sex
  Male282350.14144240.41882440.2797
  Female17160 411 160
Viral status
  Yes363420.047172813240.5687
  No963 18 90
Cell differentiation
  Poorly3210.3188030.8444300.6662
  Poorly-moderately540 13 50
  Moderately23212 418 202
  Moderately-well211 02 20
  Well431 13 31
Tumor size (cm)
  >5171510.63831311520.6337
  ≤528244 522 252
Vascular invasion
  Yes9811260.6354900.5661
  No36314 628 314
AFP
  +131300.5382390.66391111
  −25213 420 232
Metastasis
  Yes6601060.3058601
  No29254 721 253
Recurrence
  Yes8711080.1497800.5548
  No25223 717 213
Survival
  Yes312650.31027230.16122640.5558
  No10100 010 100

[i] +, ΔIL>0; -, ΔIL<0. CEACAM1, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1.

Furthermore, the maximal information coefficient (MIC) was used to assess the dependence between clinical features and the three DS genes. We focused on three classes of splicing changes in HCC tumors, including inclusion isoform expression, IL and ΔIL. The former two only considered the degree of AS in HCC tumor samples, while ΔIL reflected the AS changes between HCC tumors and non-tumors. Then we identified their significant association with clinical features at P<0.05 (Fig. 5C). Notably, ΔIL of CEACAM1 exon 7 was significantly associated with survival time (MIC=0.38915, P<0.024; Fig. 5D). The period of overall survival time was significantly shorter in patients with increased inclusion levels of exon 7 in HCC samples (P<0.014; Fig. 5E). Moreover, ΔIL of VPS29 exon 2 was closely associated with overall survival time (MIC=0.38142, P<0.029; Fig. 5F) and cell differentiation stages (MIC=0.47849, P<0.002; Fig. 5G).

Discussion

AS plays a critical role in both physiological and pathological processes. The dysregulation of AS is highly associated with diseases such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases (26). Recently, significant progress has been made in deciphering the role of aberrant AS events in carcinogenesis and drug resistance, and several novel molecules have been identified as possible therapeutic targets in clinical HCC research. Splicing-based prognostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic options hold great potential towards improvements in cancer therapy (27).

In the present study, we examined the relationship between AS events and human HCC and described several aberrant AS events in clinical HCC samples, such as increased inclusion of exon 2 of VPS29 and the exclusion of exon 3 of ISOC2, which could aid in HCC diagnosis and therapy. One important aberrant AS event existed in CEACAM1, exon 7 which revealed increased inclusion levels in HCC samples. CEACAM1 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and a type-I transmembrane glycoprotein of the carcinoembryonic antigen family (28). In HCC, the loss of CEACAM1 indicates high metastatic potential and is associated with poor survival even after hepatectomy (29). However, research on the genome scale indicated that the different CEACAM1 isoforms had divergent roles during tumorigenesis. CEACAM1-L (CEACAM1 long cytoplasmic domain isoform) is a risk factor for HCC recurrence and its overexpression is involved in tumor cell invasion and metastasis (30).

More specifically, in this study, we demonstrated that exon 7 of CEACAM1 was the critical hub of the functional differences between the CEACAM1 isoforms. Patients with increased inclusion levels of CEACAM1 exon 7 in HCC samples had significantly shorter survival times. Exon 7 is located on the 3′terminal of the CEACAM1 transcript, although it does not encode the immunoglobulin-like domain, the inclusion or exclusion of which may influence the subcellular location of the protein, which could remodel the tumorigenicity of CEACAM1 isoforms (3032).

Previous association analyses between candidate biomarkers and clinical features mainly utilized contingency tables and Fisher's exact test (15,33,34). Some qualitative features, such as sex, viral status and cell differentiation could not well observe the potential relevant trends with expression or splicing changes. In the present study, the MIC was first applied to the clinicopathological analysis, including both qualitative and quantitative features. This MIC method efficiently characterized the relationships for all clinical features and is expected to extend the applications in the biomarker research field.

In summary, the present study undertook a strategy of ‘small sample sequencing and large sample validation’, which means that a small number of samples for deep sequencing provided the differential spliced biomarker candidates, and a large number of samples for validation experiments confirmed the significantly differential splicing. The development of high-throughput technology has led to the generation of huge amounts of data on HCC and other cancer types. We anticipate that our method could be widely applied to thoroughly research these big datasets and discover more valuable biomarkers for HCC. The novel splicing biomarkers in this study could also provide a new understanding of HCC research.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (nos. 2016YFC0902400 and 2017YFC0906603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81770581, 81570526 and 81123001), the Innovation project (16CXZ027), the Program of International S&T Cooperation (nos. 2014DFB30020 and 2014DFB30010), the Beijing Science and Technology Project (Z161100002616036), the Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Proteomics (Academy of Military Medical Sciences, SKLP-O201509). All funding was received during this study, and there was no additional external funding received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

PW and DZ designed the study, analyzed the results and created a draft of the manuscript; YW and WL collected the experimental samples and performed the qPCR experiment; AS, HW and YF prepared the experimental materials and performed the statistical analysis; XC and YJ conceived the study, performed the data interpretation, revised and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

A3SS

alternative 3′splice site

A5SS

alternative 5′splice site

AS

alternative splicing

DE

differentially expressed

DS

differentially spliced

FDR

false discovery rate

FPKM

fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads

HBV

hepatitis B virus

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV

hepatitis C virus

IL

inclusion level

MIC

maximal information coefficient

MXE

mutually exclusive exons

PSI

percent-spliced-in

RI

retained intron

RNA-Seq

RNA sequencing

RT-PCR

reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction

SE

skipped exon

References

1 

Lou J, Zhang L, Lv S, Zhang C and Jiang S: Biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomark Cancer. 9:1–9. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Burkhart RA, Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM and Pawlik TM: Personalized therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular markers of prognosis and therapeutic response. Surg Oncol. 26:138–145. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Luz FA, Brigido PC, Moraes AS and Silva MJ: Aberrant splicing in cancer: Mediators of malignant progression through an imperfect splice program shift. Oncology. 92:3–13. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ding C, Li Y, Guo F, Jiang Y, Ying W, Li D, Yang D, Xia X, Liu W, Zhao Y, et al: A cell-type-resolved liver proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 15:3190–3202. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Merkin J, Russell C, Chen P and Burge CB: Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues. Science. 338:1593–1599. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Zhang J and Manley JL: Misregulation of pre-mRNA alternative splicing in cancer. Cancer Discov. 3:1228–1237. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Villegas-Ruiz V, Hendlmeier F, Buentello-Volante B, Rodriguez-Loaiza JL, Miranda-Duarte A and Zenteno JC: Genome-wide mRNA analysis reveals a TUBD1 isoform profile as a potential biomarker for diabetic retinopathy development. Exp Eye Res. 155:99–106. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Li Y, Sun N, Lu Z, Sun S, Huang J, Chen Z and He J: Prognostic alternative mRNA splicing signature in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 393:40–51. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Singh B and Eyras E: The role of alternative splicing in cancer. Transcription. 8:91–98. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

He C, Zhou F, Zuo Z, Cheng H and Zhou R: A global view of cancer-specific transcript variants by subtractive transcriptome-wide analysis. PLoS One. 4:e47322009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Laversin SA, Phatak VM, Powe DG, Li G, Miles AK, Hughes DC, Ball GR, Ellis IO, Gritzapis AD, Missitzis I, et al: Identification of novel breast cancer-associated transcripts by UniGene database mining and gene expression analysis in normal and malignant cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 52:316–329. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Wang X, Sheng P, Guo X, Wang J, Hou L, Hu G, Luo C, Dong Y and Lu Y: Identification and expression of a novel MDM4 splice variant in human glioma. Brain Res 1537. 260–266. 2013.

13 

Arafat H, Lazar M, Salem K, Chipitsyna G, Gong Q, Pan TC, Zhang RZ, Yeo CJ and Chu ML: Tumor-specific expression and alternative splicing of the COL6A3 gene in pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 150:306–315. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kim YJ and Kim HS: Alternative splicing and its impact as a cancer diagnostic marker. Genomics Inform. 10:74–80. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Lin KT, Shann YJ, Chau GY, Hsu CN and Huang CY: Identification of latent biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma by ultra-deep whole-transcriptome sequencing. Oncogene. 33:4786–4794. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chan TH, Lin CH, Qi L, Fei J, Li Y, Yong KJ, Liu M, Song Y, Chow RK, Ng VH, et al: A disrupted RNA editing balance mediated by ADARs (Adenosine DeAminases that act on RNA) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 63:832–843. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Trapnell C, Pachter L and Salzberg SL: TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 25:1105–1111. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL and Pachter L: Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 7:562–578. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Reshef DN, Reshef YA, Finucane HK, Grossman SR, McVean G, Turnbaugh PJ, Lander ES, Mitzenmacher M and Sabeti PC: Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science. 334:1518–1524. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT and Mesirov JP: Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): High-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 14:178–192. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y and He QY: ClusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 16:284–287. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Shen S, Park JW, Huang J, Dittmar KA, Lu ZX, Zhou Q, Carstens RP and Xing Y: MATS: A Bayesian framework for flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from RNA-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e612012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Shen S, Park JW, Lu ZX, Lin L, Henry MD, Wu YN, Zhou Q and Xing Y: rMATS: Robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:E5593–E5601. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Chen Z, Chen L, Qiao SW, Nagaishi T and Blumberg RS: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 inhibits proximal TCR signaling by targeting ZAP-70. J Immunol. 180:6085–6093. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Le KQ, Prabhakar BS, Hong WJ and Li LC: Alternative splicing as a biomarker and potential target for drug discovery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 36:1212–1218. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Wojtuszkiewicz A, Assaraf YG, Maas MJ, Kaspers GJ, Jansen G and Cloos J: Pre-mRNA splicing in cancer: The relevance in oncogenesis, treatment and drug resistance. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 11:673–689. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Williams AF and Barclay AN: The immunoglobulin superfamily-domains for cell surface recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 6:381–405. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Cruz PV, Wakai T, Shirai Y, Yokoyama N and Hatakeyama K: Loss of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 expression is an adverse prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 104:354–360. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Kiriyama S, Yokoyama S, Ueno M, Hayami S, Ieda J, Yamamoto N, Yamaguchi S, Mitani Y, Nakamura Y, Tani M, et al: CEACAM1 long cytoplasmic domain isoform is associated with invasion and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 21 Suppl 4:S505–S514. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Lawson EL, Mills DR, Brilliant KE and Hixson DC: The transmembrane domain of CEACAM1-4S is a determinant of anchorage independent growth and tumorigenicity. PLoS One. 7:e296062012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Zhu J, Yang Y, Ma C, Zhang G, Wang K and Hu S: CEACAM1 cytoplastic expression is closely related to tumor angiogenesis and poorer relapse-free survival after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 35:2259–2265. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Kobel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, McKinney S, Mehl E, Palmer C, Leung S, Bowen NJ, Ionescu DN, Rajput A, et al: Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: Implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med. 5:e2322008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Viasus D, Del Rio-Pertuz G, Simonetti AF, Garcia-Vidal C, Acosta-Reyes J, Garavito A and Carratalà J: Biomarkers for predicting short-term mortality in community-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 72:273–282. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2019
Volume 41 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wu P, Zhou D, Wang Y, Lin W, Sun A, Wei H, Fang Y, Cong X and Jiang Y: Identification and validation of alternative splicing isoforms as novel biomarker candidates in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep 41: 1929-1937, 2019
APA
Wu, P., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., Lin, W., Sun, A., Wei, H. ... Jiang, Y. (2019). Identification and validation of alternative splicing isoforms as novel biomarker candidates in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology Reports, 41, 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6947
MLA
Wu, P., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., Lin, W., Sun, A., Wei, H., Fang, Y., Cong, X., Jiang, Y."Identification and validation of alternative splicing isoforms as novel biomarker candidates in hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Reports 41.3 (2019): 1929-1937.
Chicago
Wu, P., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., Lin, W., Sun, A., Wei, H., Fang, Y., Cong, X., Jiang, Y."Identification and validation of alternative splicing isoforms as novel biomarker candidates in hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Reports 41, no. 3 (2019): 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6947