Associations of three lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms, lipid profiles and coronary artery disease

  • Authors:
    • Mohamed S. Daoud
    • Farid S. Ataya
    • Dalia Fouad
    • Amal Alhazzani
    • Afaf I. Shehata
    • Abdulaziz A. Al‑Jafari
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 30, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2013.126
  • Pages: 573-582
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) plays a central role in lipoprotein metabolism by hydrolyzing the core triglycerides (TGs) of circulating chylomicrons and very‑low‑density lipoprotein (VLDL). The effects of LPL polymorphisms on lipid levels and coronary artery disease (CAD) have been inconsistent among studies and populations. To assess the lipid profiles and distributions of three LPL gene polymorphisms in Saudi patients with CAD, the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter polymorphisms in the LPL gene were analyzed in 226 patients with CAD and 110 controls. Polymerase chain reaction‑restriction fragment length polymorphism was used to detect LPL gene polymorphisms. The plasma lipid profiles of the patients were determined using standard enzymatic methods. Patients in the CAD group had significantly higher triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‑C) levels than controls irrespective of the HindIII, PvuII or Ser447Ter genotype. Compared to the findings in controls, the HindIII TT, PvuII TC and Ser447Ter CC genotypes were associated with significantly reduced high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‑C) levels in patients with CAD (P<0.0001). In summary, there are associations between LPL gene variants and high plasma TG, TC and LDL‑C levels as well as low HDL‑C levels.

Introduction

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a glycoprotein that is synthesized in the parenchymal cells of different tissues. LPL hydrolyzes circulating core triglycerides (TGs) of exogenous (chylomicron) and endogenous [very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)] origins to provide free fatty acids for oxidation and utilization in the heart and other tissues and for storage in adipose tissue (1). LPL affects circulating triglyceride (TG) levels by generating lipoprotein remnants, which are processed by hepatic lipase. Following secretion, LPL attaches to the luminal surface of endothelial cells, in which it has a significant role in the catabolism of lipoproteins in circulation and interacts with lipoproteins locally (2). It was previously reported that LPL increases the retention of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and VLDL particles by the subendothelial matrix of the arterial wall, which enhances the conversion of these lipoproteins into more atherogenic forms (3). These localized and deleterious effects cannot be assessed by measuring either circulating LPL or TG levels but can be explored by identifying genetic variants of LPL and their relationships with the presence and extent of atherosclerotic lesions. Findings of previous studies revealed that plasma lipoprotein concentrations are significant predictors for the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) (4). Thus, genes with essential roles in lipoprotein metabolism are excellent candidates for inter-individual variation in the susceptibility to CHD (5), including the LPL gene. The LPL gene spans over 30 kb on chromosome 8p22, and is divided into 10 exons (6). The major products of LPL activity are free fatty acids and glycerol for energy utilization and storage (1) and LDL activity is accompanied by the formation of intermediate-density lipoprotein and chylomicrons remnants (CRs). Independent of its lipolytic activity, LPL binds to and travels with CRs to the liver, where it enhances the clearance of these lipoproteins via LDL receptors (7). Due to the pivotal role of LPL in lipid metabolism, genetic defects in the LPL gene can affect lipoprotein metabolism, resulting in an atherogenic lipid profile. A number of mutation have been identified in this locus. Additionally, several rare mutations in the LPL gene have been associated with markedly reduced enzyme activity and a number of common variants have been associated with moderate changes in LPL catalytic function (8). However, there is controversy with regard to the effects of these variants on LPL activity. For example, Emi et al (9) reported that the G188E mutation leads to the expression of an inactive enzyme, which explains the manifestation of LPL deficiency. However, Hallman et al (10) did not find any association between the HindIII(−) allele and higher LPL activity. The associations of certain polymorphic loci in the LPL promoter, introns or exons with lipid disorders and coronary artery disease (CAD) have been reported by some groups (rs285, rs1800590, rs320, rs268, rs1801177) (68,1114) but contested by other authors (1517). To the best of our knowledge, no data on the screening of such specific polymorphisms in the Saudi population have been reported. Therefore, the aim of the present investigation was to determine and address the lipid profile and distribution of the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter polymorphisms of LPL in Saudi patients with CAD.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

The study comprised 226 patients (157 males and 69 females, aged 42–82 years) who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and 103 healthy subjects (58 males and 45 females, aged 20–78 years) who had no history of CAD as controls. The subjects included in this study were of unrestricted age and gender. All the subjects provided written informed consent prior to participation as well as to having blood drawn at the time of angiography or time of screening for DNA extraction. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the King Khalid University Hospital. This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines set by the Ethics Committee of the College of Medicine and Research Centre of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All subjects enrolled in this study were Saudi residents with similar dietary patterns. The key demographic data of the subjects were recorded including age, gender and lipid profiles. CAD was assessed by review of the patients’ angiograms by their treating cardiologists.

Sample collection and lipid analysis

Blood samples for the glucose and lipid measurements were drawn from the patients and controls subsequent to an overnight fast. The plasma glucose concentration was measured by the glucose oxidase method using a Biotrol kit (Biotrol, Earth City, MO, USA) on a Bayer Opera analyzer [Bayer Diagnostics (Siemens), Munich, Germany]. Serum total cholesterol (TC) was measured using a Biotrol kit, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured using a commercial Randox kit (Randox Laboratories Ltd., London, UK). LDL cholesterol [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)] levels were calculated using the Friedewald formula and TG levels were measured using the lipase/glycerol kinase UV endpoint method of the Opera analyzer.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood specimens, which were drawn into tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, using the QIAamp DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Genotyping

The presence of three common polymorphisms of the LPL gene was determined by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis using genomic DNA. The primer sets were selected on the basis of previously published information as follows (18): HindIII forward (H1): 5′-TGA AGC TCA AAT GGA AGA GT-3′, and reverse (H2): 5′-TAC AAG CAA ATG ACT AAA-3′; PvuII forward (P1): 5′-ATG GCA CCC ATG TGT AAG GTG-3′, and reverse (P2): 5′-GTG AAC TTC TGA TAA CAA TCT C-3′; and Ser447Ter forward: 5′-TAC ACT AGC AAT GTC TAG GTG A-3′, and reverse: 5′-TCA GCT TTA GCC CAG AAT GC-3′. In each reaction, 3 μl (150 ng) of the genomic DNA template was added to the PCR reaction mixture, which consisted of 12.5 μl of 2X Promega master mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), 2 μl of each primer and distilled water to a final volume of 25 μl. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 sec, annealing at 50°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 2 min. PCR was performed in a MyCycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

LPL gene polymorphism analysis

Digestion of the PCR products was performed by adding 1 μl of the respective restriction enzyme (HindIII and PvuII, both Promega Corporation; MnlI: New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) to 10 μl of the PCR product containing 2 μl of 10X buffer solution (final reaction volume of 20 μl). The mixtures were centrifuged for 2 min at 3,913 x g and incubated in a water bath at 37°C overnight. The resulting fragments were resolved by electrophoresis (80 V, 60 min) on a 2.5% agarose gel and visualized using UV light. The HindIII site (intron 8) produced a 600 bp fragment following digestion. The PvuII restriction site (intron 6) yielded 330 and 110 bp fragments. Genotypes were scored by an experienced reader blinded to the clinical and angiographic results. The polymorphic allele with the restriction site was designated as ‘T’ and the allele without the site as ‘G’ for HindIII. For PvuII, the allele with the restriction site was designated as ‘T’ and that without the site as ‘C’. The 488 bp PCR product contained two MnlI restriction sites, one of which is a polymorphic site indicating the Ser447Ter mutation. Digestion of the PCR product with MnlI resulted in three fragments of 290, 250 and 200 bp (18,19). The identified genotypes were named according to the presence or absence of the enzyme restriction sites; for example, Ser447Ter GG, GC and CC indicated homozygosity for the presence of the site, and heterozygosity and homozygosity for the absence of the site, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Measurement data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and compared using the two-sample Student’s t-test. Enumeration count data were summarized as numbers (%) and compared using the χ2 test. Two analyses were used to evaluate the allelic and genotypic frequencies that were calculated from the observed genotypic counts and to assess the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations. The same methodology was applied to comparisons between allelic and genotypic frequencies. Associations were determined as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The likelihood of carrying a specific allele was defined as the number of subjects who carried the allele divided by the number of subjects in who did not carry the allele. The OR for the LPL genotype distribution was determined using χ2 analysis. The CAD was defined as the odds of allelic carriage in the diseased (CAD) group divided by the odds of allelic carriage in the healthy (control) group. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Patient data

Details regarding the clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population (226 patients with CAD and 103 controls) are included in Table I. Patients with CAD had significantly lower HDL-C concentrations compared to the control group and significantly higher plasma levels of fasting blood sugar, TG, TC and LDL-C (P<0.0001 for each) compared to the control subjects.

Table I.

Characteristics of the controls and patients.

Table I.

Characteristics of the controls and patients.

CharacteristicControls (n=103)CAD group (n=226)P-value
Age, years (mean ± SD, range)46.60±16.69 (20.0–78.0)61.62±9.89 (42.0–82.0)<0.0001
Gender: male (%), female (%)58 (56.3), 45 (43.7)157 (69.50), 69 (30.50)<0.0001
Fasting blood sugar, mmol/l (mean ± SD, range)4.48±0.66 (3.21–7.10)8.0±3.48 (3.3–20.6)<0.0001
TG, mmol/l (mean ± SD, range)1.11±0.28 (0.53–1.94)2.79±0.99 (1.84–8.7)<0.0001
TC, mmol/l (mean ± SD, range)3.81±0.56 (3.01–7.11)5.04±0.83 (3.10–8.3)<0.0001
HDL-C, mmol/l (mean ± SD, range)1.24±0.38 (0.76–2.15)1.11±0.38 (0.53–3.12)0.004
LDL-C, mmol/l (mean ± SD, range)1.65±0.61 (0.86–4.50)2.72±0.83 (1.12–5.89)<0.0001

[i] The Student’s t-test and the χ2 test were used to compare the values of the controls and patients. SD, standard deviation; CAD, coronary artery disease; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Risk factors for CAD

Diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hyper-tension and smoking were selected as major risk factors. The frequencies of the major CAD risk factors are shown in Table II. Diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension and smoking were more frequently present in the patient group than in the control group and diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension and smoking were identified as risk factors for CAD (OR=22.53, 9.04, 24.79 and 3.59, respectively, P<0.0001 for each).

Table II.

Risk factors for CAD in patients and controls.

Table II.

Risk factors for CAD in patients and controls.

ParameterCAD (n=226)Control (n=103)OR95% CIP-value
Diabetes mellitus
  Diabetic148 (66%)8 (7%)
  Non-diabetic78 (34%)95 (93%)22.5310.41–48.75<0.0001
Dyslipidemia
  Positive128 (57%)13 (12%)
  Negative98 (43%)90 (88%)9.044.77–17.11<0.0001
Hypertension
  Hypertensive169 (75%)11 (11%)
  Normotensive57 (25%)92 (89%)24.7912.39–49.61<0.0001
Smoking
  Smoker90 (40%)16 (15%)
  Non-smoker136 (60%)87 (85%)3.591.98–6.53<0.0001

[i] CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

The entire study population was genotyped for three LPL gene polymorphisms: HindIII (alleles designated as T and G), PvuII (alleles designated as T and C) and Ser447Ter (alleles designated G and C). Table III shows the genotypes and frequencies for the observed alleles. For all polymorphisms in the patients and controls, the distribution of genotypes yielded from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were as expected. Allele frequencies did not differ significantly between the CAD and control groups. Within the CAD group (n=226), the TT HindIII genotype was identified in 102 patients (45.1%), whereas 81 (35.8%) and 43 patients (19%) carried the TG and GG genotypes, respectively. Within the control group (n=103), the TT genotype was identified in 42 subjects (40.8%), whereas 35 (34%) and 26 subjects (25.2%) carried the TG and GG genotypes, respectively. Regarding HindIII, patients with CAD were less likely to carry the GG genotype than the control group and patients with CAD had higher frequencies of the TT and TG genotypes. For the PvuII genotype, the TT genotype was identified in 89 patients (39.4%) within the CAD group, whereas 44 (42.7%) and 35 patients (15.5%) carried the TC and CC genotypes, respectively. Within the control group, the TT genotype was identified in 46 patients (44.7%), while 44 (42.7%) carried the TC genotype and 13 patients (12.6%) carried the CC genotype. Concerning PvuII, patients with CAD had higher frequencies of the TC and CC genotypes but a lower frequency of the TT genotype compared to the controls. For the Ser447Ter genotype, the CC genotype was found in 185 patients (81.9%) within the CAD group, whereas 41 patients (18.1%) carried the GC genotype. Within the control group (n=103), the CC genotype was identified in 92 patients (89.3%) and 11 patients (10.7%) carried the GC genotype. We did not find any GG genotypes in either group for this gene. A higher frequency of the GC genotype and a lower frequency of the CC genotype were observed in the CAD group compared to the control group.

Table III.

Genotype distributions and allele frequencies of the Hindlll, Pvull and Ser447Ter polymorphisms.

Table III.

Genotype distributions and allele frequencies of the Hindlll, Pvull and Ser447Ter polymorphisms.

Genotype
Allele frequency
MutantNormalHeterozygote
HindlllTTGGTGT alleleG allele
Controls (n=103)42.0 (40.8%)26.0 (25.2%)35.0 (34%)119 (57.77%)87 (42.23%)
Patients (n=226)102.0 (45.1%)43.0 (19%)81.0 (35.8%)285 (63.05%)167 (36.95%)
P-value0.4600.2000.7430.1960.196
PvullTTCCTCT alleleC allele
Controls (n=103)46.0 (44.7%)13.0 (12.6%)44.0 (42.7%)136 (66.02%)70 (33.98%)
Patients (n=226)89.0 (39.4%)35.0 (15.5%)102.0 (45.1%)280 (61.95%)172 (38.05%)
P-value0.3760.4950.6820.3150.315
Ser447TerGGCCGCG alleleC allele
Controls (n=103)092.0 (89.3%)11.0 (10.7%)11 (5.34%)195 (94.66%)
Patients (n=226)0185 (81.9%)41.0 (18.1%)41 (9.07%)411 (90.93%)
P-value-0.0880.0880.1030.103

[i] The χ2 test was used to compare the allele frequencies between the control and coronary artery disease groups.

Data are presented as the observed number of cases and the expected number of cases in parentheses. The χ2 test was used for comparisons between positive and negative risk factors.

Relationships between the frequencies of major CAD risk factors and LPL gene polymorphisms

The relationships between the frequencies of major CAD risk factors and those of LPL gene polymorphisms in the patients with CAD are presented in Table IV. The results revealed associations between LPL HindIII genotypes and hypertension (χ2=6.68, P=0.03) and smoking (χ2=5.80, P=0.05). Additionally, a positive relationship between PvuII genotypes and smoking (χ2=6.964, P=0.03) was noted as well as a relationship between Ser447Ter genotypes and diabetes (χ2=6.74, P=0.009).

Table IV.

Relationships between lipoprotein lipase (LPL) genotypes and the presence of risk factors (diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension and smoking).

Table IV.

Relationships between lipoprotein lipase (LPL) genotypes and the presence of risk factors (diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension and smoking).

GenotypeTotalχ2P-value

TTGGTG

LPL-HindIII
  Diabetes
    Diabetic69 (66.79)27 (28.15)52 (53.04)148--
    Non-diabetic33 (35.02)16 (14.84)29 (27.96)78--
    Total10243812260.410.82
  Dyslipidemia
    Positive59 (57.77)30 (24.35)39 (45.88)128--
    Negative43 (44.23)13 (18.64)42 (35.12)98--
    Total10243812265.460.07
  Hypertension
    Hypertensive68 (76.27)34 (32.15)67 (60.57)169--
    Normotensive34 (25.73)9 (10.84)14 (20.42)57--
    Total10243812266.680.03
  Smoking
    Smoker38 (40.61)24 (17.12)28 (32.25)90--
    Non-smoker64 (61.38)19 (25.87)53 (48.74)136--
    Total10243812265.800.05

GenotypesTotalχ2P-value

TTCCTC

LPL-PvuII
  Diabetes
    Diabetic57 (58.28)25 (22.92)66 (66.79)148--
    Non-diabetic32 (30.71)10 (12.07)36 (35.20)78--
    Total89351022260.660.72
  Dyslipidemia
    Positive48 (50.41)24 (19.82)56 (57.76)128--
    Negative41 (38.59)11 (15.17)46 (44.23)98--
    Total89351022262.420.29
  Hypertension
    Hypertensive61 (66.55)25 (26.17)83 (76.27)169--
    Normotensive28 (22.44)10 (8.82)19 (25.72)57--
    Total89351022264.390.11
  Smoking
    Smoker26 (35.44)17 (13.94)47 (40.62)90--
    Non-smoker63 (53.56)18 (21.06)55 (61.38)136--
    Total89351022266.9640.03

GenotypesTotalχ2P-value

GGCCGC

Ser447Ter
  Diabetes
    Diabetic034 (26.84)114 (121.5)148--
    Non-diabetic07 (14.17)71 (63.84)78--
    Total0411852266.740.009
  Dyslipidemia
    Positive026 (23.22)102 (104.77)128--
    Negative015 (17.78)83 (80.22)98--
  Total0411852260.330.214
  Hypertension
    Hypertensive032 (30.66)137 (138.34)169--
    Normotensive09 (10.34)48 (46.65)57--
    Total0411852260.590.38
  Smoking
    Smoker013 (16.32)77 (73.67)90--
    Non-smoker028 (24.67)108 (111.32)136--
    Total0411852260.240.16
Relationships between the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes and lipid parameters of CAD and the control groups

The relationships between the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes and the lipid parameters of the CAD and control groups are shown in Table V. TG, TC and LDL-C levels were significantly higher in the CAD group compared to the control group irrespective of the HindIII, PvuII or Ser447Ter genotype (P<0.0001 for each), whereas compared to the levels in the control group, the HindIII TT (P=0.03), PvuII TC (P=0.006) and Ser447Ter CC genotypes (P=0.003) were associated with decreased HDL-C levels in the CAD group.

Table V.

Lipid concentration in three genotypes of lipoprotein lipase (HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter).

Table V.

Lipid concentration in three genotypes of lipoprotein lipase (HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter).

ParametersGroupsHindIII genotypesPvuII genotypesSer447Ter genotypes



TTTGGGTTTCCCGCCC
TG (mmol/l)Control (n)4235264644131192
Mean ± SD1.11±0.031.13±0.271.09±0.251.08±0.261.17±0.321.05±0.171.11±0.311.11±0.28
Range0.53–1.940.59–1.720.63–1.580.53–1.720.59–1.940.81–1.380.73–1.640.53–1.94
CAD (n)1028143891023541185
Mean ± SD2.88±0.982.70±0.882.77±1.232.81±1.072.74±0.872.92±1.162.93±1.312.77±0.91
Range1.84–8.701.84–7.41.89–8.51.87–8.701.84–7.401.84–5.901.92–8.501.84–8.70
P-value0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
TC (mmol/l)Control (n)4235264644131192
Mean ± SD3.74±0.463.95±0.743.75±0.373.79±0.663.78±0.423.98±0.563.77±0.373.82±0.58
Range3.01–5.113.12–7.113.19–4.533.11–7.113.01–4.913.21–4.913.14–4.193.01–7.11
CAD (n)1028143891023541185
Mean ± SD5.07±0.834.93±0.735.17±1.015.14±0.944.99±0.784.93±0.674.97±0.925.05±0.82
Range3.10–7.703.70–7.423.90–8.303.70–8.303.10–7.704.0–6.303.90–8.303.10–7.70
P-value0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
HDL-C (mmol/l)Control (n)4235264644131192
Mean ± SD1.29±0.421.18±0.321.25±0.371.23±0.421.27±0.361.23±0.281.27±0.371.24±0.38
Range0.76–1.990.76–2.110.81–2.150.76–2.150.76–2.110.79–1.680.89–1.990.76–2.15
CAD (n)1028143891023541185
Mean ± SD1.13±0.391.07±0.311.17±0.471.11±0.391.09±0.361.16±0.421.17±0.461.10±0.36
Range0.53–2.800.59–2.150.73–3.120.60–8.300.53–2.490.76–2.800.73–3.120.53–2.80
P-value0.030.0850.4620.1010.0060.5810.0710.003
LDL-C (mmol/l)Control (n)4235264644131192
Mean ± SD1.62±0.551.74±0.701.58±0.711.60±0.671.59±0.482.02±0.651.76±0.571.64±0.61
Range0.86-2.800.91–4.500.97–3.120.86–4.500.90–2.501.02–3.120.90–2.510.86–4.50
CAD (n)1028143891023541185
Mean ± SD2.71±0.842.61±0.752.94±0.912.73±0.912.75±0.772.57±0.742.75±0.902.70±0.81
Range1.12–5.891.16–5.411.45–4.811.12–5.891.34–4.981.15–4.311.57–5.411.12–5.89
P-value0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0230.0000.000

[i] SD, standard deviation; TG, triglyceride; CAD, coronary artery disease; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Association among the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes

As shown in Table VI, no association was observed between the HindIII and PvuII genotypes. However, an association between the HindIII and Ser447Ter genotypes was noted (χ2=7.33, P=0.03). A significant relationship was observed between the PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes (χ2=7.3, P=0.02).

Table VI.

Associations among the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes

Table VI.

Associations among the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes

LPL HindIII genotypesTotalχ2P-value

TTGGTG

LPL PvuII genotypesTT43 (40.17)12 (16.93)34 (31.90)89--
CC16 (15.79)8 (6.65)11 (12.54)35--
TC43 (46.03)23 (19.41)36 (36.55)102
Total10243812263.110.54

LPL HindIII genotypesTotalχ2P-value

TTGGTG

LPL Ser447Ter genotypesCC90 (83.49)36 (35.19)59 (66.30)185--
GC12 (18.50)7 (7.80)22 (14.69)41--
Total10243812267.330.03

LPL PvuII genotypesTotalχ2P-value

TTCCTC

LPL Ser447Ter genotypesCC76 (72.85)23 (28.65)86 (83.49)185--
GC13 (16.14)12 (6.35)16 (18.50)41--
Total89351022267.30.02

[i] LPL, lipoprotein lipase.

Haplotype frequencies for the three LPL polymorphisms

Haplotype reconstruction for the three LPL polymorphisms under study revealed 18 haplotypes possessing HindIII (intron 8 T481G), PvuII and Ser447Ter polymorphisms. The GGTTCC and TGCCCC haplotypes were significantly more common in the control group compared to the CAD group (P=0.003 and 0.007, respectively, Table VII).

Table VII.

Haplotype frequencies of the LPL gene polymorphisms (HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter) in the CAD and controls groups.

Table VII.

Haplotype frequencies of the LPL gene polymorphisms (HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter) in the CAD and controls groups.

HaplotypesCAD (n=226) n (%)Controls (n=103) n (%)OR95% CIP-value
TTTTCC39 (17.26)13 (12.62)1.440.73–2.830.287
TTTCCC38 (16.81)21 (20.40)0.7890.44–1.420.433
TGTTCC29 (12.83)13 (12.62)1.020.51–2.050.957
TGTCCC28 (12.39)10 (9.71)1.320.61–2.820.481
GGTCCC20 (8.85)8 (7.77)1.150.49–2.710.744
TTTCGC13 (5.75)3 (2.91)2.030.57–7.300.275
GGTTCC9 (3.98)14 (13.59)0.2630.11–0.630.003
TGCCGC8 (3.54)08.050.46–140.80.153
TGTCGC8 (3.54)1 (0.97)3.740.46–30.320.216
GGCCCC7 (3.10)2 (1.94)1.610.33–7.900.554
TTTCGC5 (2.21)3 (2.91)0.7540.18–3.210.703
TGTTTC5 (2.21)3 (2.91)0.7540.18–3.210.703
TTTTGC4 (1.77)2 (1.94)0.910.164–5.050.914
TGCCCC3 (1.33)8 (7.77)0.1590.041–0.620.007
GGTCGC3 (1.33)1 (0.97)1.370.14–13.350.785
GGTTGC3 (1.33)1 (0.97)1.370.14–13.350.785
TTCCGC3 (1.33)03.240.17–63.330.44
GGCCGC1 (0.44)01.380.06–34.090.845

[i] LPL, lipoprotein lipase; CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

CAD is a complex disease with well-documented genetic and environmental components. The findings of most genetic studies of CAD are controversial, likely because the genetic risk of CAD is not based on a single gene but is instead based on interactions among several pathophysiological pathways involving multiple genes and environmental risk factors. LPL is a potential target for the treatment of CAD because LPL gene variants are involved in a number of pathophysiological conditions associated with CAD. Several mutations of the LPL gene have been identified thus far and 20% of these mutations occur in noncoding regions (2021). The LPL gene is one of the most appealing candidate genes that may be used to explain some of the lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities encountered in numerous cases of CAD. In this study, we presented results on polymorphisms and haplotypes of the LPL gene in a Saudi population and the possible association of these polymorphisms with CAD and lipid profiles in some detail.

CAD is a multifactorial disorder believed to result from an interaction between the genetic background and environmental factors such as diet, smoking and physical activity. CAD is usually associated with conventional risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia (22). In the present study, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension and smoking were identified as risk factors for CAD and a positive association was found between LPL HindIII genotypes and hypertension and smoking. Additionally, an association between PvuII genotypes and smoking was observed. The association between Ser447Ter genotypes and diabetes was evident in the present study. In general, individuals with hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia were considered at high risk for CAD, while subjects that did not exhibit any of these factors were considered low-risk subjects. Age, smoking, hypertension and diabetes have been established as independent risk factors for ischemic cardiovascular disease (23). Hypertension and dyslipidemia were found to influence CAD (24). Genetic factors were statistically independent of age, smoking, hyperuricemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia. Smoking was considered an important environmental factor for CAD in men at low risk, consistent with the hypothesis that the cessation of smoking is important in the prevention of CAD in these individuals (23). It has been documented that dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and obesity were more common among patients with a +/− genotype than among controls of the same genotype, while dyslipidemia and hypertension were identified as independent risk factors for CAD (24).

The frequencies of the HindIII (TT, 45.1; TG, 35.8 and GG, 19%) and PvuII genotypes (TT, 39.4; TG, 42.7 and CC, 15.5%) in the present study were similar to those found in different ethnic groups, including Northern Europeans (7), Caucasians (25), Russians (26) and Tunisians (27). The allele frequencies of PvuII (C) and HindIII (G) in this study were similar to those found in other Caucasian populations. Ahn et al (25) reported allele frequencies of 0.45 and 0.26 for PvuII(−) and HindIII(−), respectively, in a control population (n=539). Peacock et al (28) also reported frequencies of 0.435 and 0.228 for PvuII(−) and HindIII(−), respectively, among 92 healthy control subjects. A strong linkage disequilibrium was also identified between the two PvuII and HindIII polymorphisms in several other studies (2833).

It was of interest to compare the Ser447Ter gene polymorphism frequency of our population (81.9 CC and 18.1% GC) with other published data as there is considerable variation in the reported frequency of this polymorphism in different populations (7.4–20%) (12,34,35). Komurcu-Bayrak et al (36) reported a Ser447Ter allele frequency of 11% among randomly selected Turkish participants and obtained a similar minor allele frequency for Ser447Ter in the group without CAD and a lower minor allele frequency in the group with significant CAD.

The HindIII TT (P=0.03), PvuII TC (P=0.006) and Ser447Ter CC genotypes (P=0.003) were associated with significantly lower HDL-C levels in the CAD group compared to the control group (Table V).

The present study clarified the associations among the HindIII, PvuII and Ser447Ter genotypes of the LPL gene and the lipid parameters of patients with CAD. TG, TC and LDL-C levels were higher in the CAD group compared to the control group, irrespective of the LPL genotype, whereas compared to the control group, HDL-C levels were significantly reduced in patients with CAD who had the HindIII TT, PvuII TC and Ser447Ter CC genotypes. Previous studies have investigated the effect of LPL gene activity on the plasma levels of TG, TC, HDL-C and apolipoproteins; however, the results have been inconsistent (19,3740). Clee et al (38) demonstrated that decreased plasma LPL activity is associated with high TG and low HDL-C levels in patient samples, and the Ser447Ter mutation is associated with higher plasma LPL activity. Common variants of the LPL gene have differential effects on plasma lipid concentrations and the development of atherosclerosis. The association of PvuII and HindIII polymorphisms with hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C levels and CAD were reported in several studies (68). These effects of the HindIII polymorphism on TG and HDL-C levels are consistent with the physiological role of LPL, which both hydrolyzes TG-rich lipoproteins and modulates plasma HDL-C levels. The HindIII polymorphism is located in intron 8 of the LPL gene, and therefore, should not be the cause of the observed effects (41).

The relationship between hypertriglyceridemia and the PvuII RFLP polymorphism of the LPL gene was investigated in different populations. An association between the LPL PvuII polymorphism and lipid disorders was recorded in a Japanese population and this association occurred due to significantly higher triglyceride concentrations in the PvuII +/+ compared to the −/− genotype group (30). Similar results have been reported for Australian (42), French (43) and Japanese school children (44) and the Welsh (32) population. Authors of those studies also reported a significant decrease in HDL-C concentrations in the PvuII −/− genotype group of CAD patients not receiving lipid-lowering drugs. In contrast to these findings, the PvuII −/− genotype was observed to be associated with higher TG concentrations than the +/+ genotype in a Chinese population in the Beijing area (45). Although Jemaa et al (46) failed to demonstrate any significant relationship between lipid concentrations and PvuII polymorphisms in a French population, their observations suggested an association between PvuII polymorphisms and the severity of coronary lesions. Similar results were reported by Wang et al (42) in a study of 500 Australian cardiology patients. In addition to a significant relationship between PvuII RFLP polymorphisms and hyper-triglyceridemia, this study also identified correlations between this polymorphism and CAD and diabetes.

In several studies, the Ser447Ter allele was associated with a reduced risk of CAD (12,4750). The beneficial effects of the Ser447Ter (S447X) polymorphism may be related to favorable effects on lipid levels. Previous studies in the Turkish population demonstrated that carriers of the X447 allele, compared with noncarriers, had lower plasma TG levels and higher levels of HDL-C and they were protected against metabolic syndrome (18). Metabolic syndrome and hyperlipidemia increase the severity of CAD (51). Thus, we hypothesized that there is a relationship between the Ser447Ter polymorphism of the LPL gene and the severity of CAD.

In our study, the GGTTCC and TGCCCC haplotypes were significantly more common among the controls. However, the TGCCGC, TTCCGC and GGCCGC haplotypes were observed only in the CAD group. Anderson et al (7) reported that in 483 patients with CAD, the estimated frequency of the HindIII(+)/PvuII(−) (TC) haplotype was nominally greater than that in the control subjects, whereas for the other haplotypes (TT, GT), the estimated frequencies were lower than those of the control subjects. Additionally, the frequency of the GC genotype was similar between the CAD and control groups. After adjustment for potential confounders, the OR for CAD associated with the GGTTCC haplotype compared to the wild type was 0.263 (95% CI, 0.11–0.63, P=0.003) and that for TGCCCC was 0.159 (95% CI, 0.041–0.62, P=0.007) (Table VII). Consequently, the GGTTCC and TGCCCC haplotypes may have been protective against CAD in our studied population.

Goodarzi et al (52) found several differences in the allele and haplotype frequencies of the three LPL markers. Such differences may affect the results of association studies conducted in different populations. Rebhi et al (27) reported that the CTGTAA haplotype was significantly more common among patients with significant coronary stenosis than among controls. However, the CGGGAA haplotype occurred significantly more frequently in the control group compared to the coronary stenosis group. The TGGTAG, TTAGAA and CGGGAG haplotypes were observed only in the coronary stenosis group.

In conclusion, differences in relative genotype frequencies were noted between the patient and control groups. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance (Table III). There were significant differences in the plasma levels of TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG in association with the LPL genotypes (Table V), suggesting an association between these polymorphisms and the lipid profiles of patients with CAD. CAD may therefore be a complex disorder caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors that may influence the onset of disease (Tables II and IV).

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this study through the research group project no. RGP-VPP-173.

References

1 

Al-Jafari AA and Cryer A: The lipoprotein lipase of white adipose tissue. Studies on the intracellular distribution of the adipocyte-associated enzyme. Biochem J. 236:749–756. 1986.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Auwerz J, Leroy P and Schoonjans K: Lipoprotein lipase: recent contributions from molecular biology. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 29:243–268. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Saxena U, Klein MG, Vanni TM and Goldberg IJ: Lipoprotein lipase increases low density lipoprotein retention by subendothelial cell matrix. J Clin Invest. 89:373–380. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Goldbourt U, Yaari S and Medalie JH: Isolated low HDL cholesterol as a risk factor for coronary heart disease mortality. A 21-year follow-up of 8000 men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 17:107–113. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Stephens JW and Humphries SE: The molecular genetics of cardiovascular disease: clinical implications. J Intern Med. 253:120–127. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Su Z, Zhang S, Hou Y, Zhang Li, Liao L and Xiao C: Relationship between a novel polymorphism of lipoprotein lipase gene and coronary heart disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 115:677–680. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Anderson JL, King GJ, Bair TL, Elmer SP, Muhlestein JB, Habashi J, Mixson L and Carlquist JF: Association of lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphism with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 33:1013–1020. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Sagoo GS, Tatt I, Salanti G, Butterworth AS, Sarwar N, van Maarle M, Jukema JW, Wiman B, Kastelein JJ, Bennet AM, et al: Seven lipoprotein gene polymorphisms, lipid fractions, and coronary disease: A HuGE association review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 168:1233–1246. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Emi M, Wilson DE, Iverius PH, Wu L, Hata A, Hegele R, Williams RR and Lalouel JM: Missense mutations (Gly - Glu 188) of human lipoprotein lipase imparting functional deficiency. J Biol Chem. 10:5910–5916. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Hallman DM, Groenemeijer BE, Jukema JW, Boerwinkle E and Kastelein JJ: Analysis of lipoprotein lipase haplotypes reveals associations not apparent from analysis of the constituent loci. Ann Hum Genet. 63:499–510. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Hu Y, Liu W, Huang R and Zhang X: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between lipoprotein lipase Asn291Ser variant and diseases. J Lipid Res. 47:1908–1914. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Wittrup HH, Tybjaerg-Hansen A and Nordestgaard BG: Lipoprotein lipase mutations, plasma lipids and lipoproteins, and risk of ischemic heart disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation. 99:2901–2907. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Socquard E, Durlach A, Clavel C, Nazeyrollas P and Durlach V: Association of HindIII and PvuII genetic polymorphisms of lipo-protein lipase with lipid metabolism and macrovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 32:262–269. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Gigek Cde O, Chen ES, Cendoroglo MS, Ramos LR, Araujo LM, Payao SL and Smith Mde A: Association of lipoprotein lipase polymorphisms with myocardial infarction and lipid levels. Clin Chem Lab Med. 45:599–604. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

15 

McGladdery SH, Pimstone SN, Clee SM, Bowden JF, Hayden MR and Frohlich JJ: Common mutations in the lipoprotein lipase gene (LPL): effects on HDL-cholesterol levels in a Chinese Canadian population. Atherosclerosis. 156:401–407. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Brousseau ME, Goldkamp AL, Collins D, Demissie S, Connolly AC, Cupples LA, Ordovas JM, Bloomfield HE, Robins SJ and Schaefer EJ: Polymorphisms in the gene encoding lipoprotein lipase in men with low HDL-C and coronary heart disease: the Veterans Affairs. HDL Intervention. Trial J Lipid Res. 45:1885–1891. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Ferencak G, Pasalic D, Grskovic B, Cheng S, Fijal B, Sesto M, Skodlar J and Rukavina AS: Lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms in Croatian patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 41:541–546. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Sawano M, Watanabe Y, Ohmura H, Shimada K, Diada H, Mokuno H and Yamaguchi H: Potentailly protective effects of the Ser447-Ter mutation of the lipoprotein lipase gene against the development of coronary artery disease in Japanese subjects via a beneficial lipid profile. Jpn Circ J. 65:310–314. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Shimo-Nakanishi Y, Urabe T, Hattori N, Watanabe Y, Nagao T, Yokochi M, Hamamoto M and Mizuno Y: Polymorphism of the lipoprotein lipase gene and risk of atherothrombotic cerebral infarction in the Japanese. Stroke. 32:1481–1486. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Fisher RM, Humphries SE and Talmud PJ: Common variation in the lipoprotein lipase gene: effects on plasma lipids and risk of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 135:145–159. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Murthy V, Julien P and Gagne C: Molecular pathobiology of the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Pharmacol Ther. 70:101–135. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Gensini GF, Comeglio M and Colella A: Classical risk factors and emerging elements in the risk profile for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 19:A53–A61. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hirashiki A, Yamada Y, Murase Y, Suzuki Y, Kataoka H, Morimoto Y, Tajika T, Murohara T and Yokota M: Association of gene polymorphisms with coronary artery disease in low- or high-risk subjects defined by conventional risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 42:1429–1437. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Duman BS, Turkoglu C, Akpınar B, Guden M, Vertii A, Dak E, Cagatay P, Gunay D and Buyukdevrim AS: Lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphism and lipid profile in coronary artery disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 128:869–974. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ahn YI, Kamboh MI, Hamman RF, Cole SA and Ferrell RE: Two DNA polymorphisms in the lipoprotein lipase gene and their associations with factors related to cardiovascular disease. J Lipid Res. 34:421–428. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Shagisultanova EI, Mustafina OE, Tuktarova IA and Khusnutdinova EK: HindIII polymorphism of lipoprotein lipase gene and risk of myocardial infarction. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 3:18–22. 2001.(In Russian).

27 

Rebhi L, Kchok K, Omezzine A, Kacem S, Rejeb J, Ben HadjMbarek I, Belkahla R, Boumaiza I, Moussa A, Ben Rejeb N, et al: Six lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms, lipid profile and coronary stenosis in a Tunisian population. Mol Biol Rep. 39:9893–9901. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Peacock RE, Hamsten A, Nilsson-Ehle P and Humphries SE: Associations between lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms and plasma correlations of lipids, lipoproteins and lipase activities in young myocardial infarction survivors and age-matched healthy individuals from Sweden. Atherosclerosis. 97:171–185. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Thorn JA, Chamberlain JC, Alcolado JC, Oka K, Chan L, Stocks J and Galton DJ: Lipoprotein and hepatic lipase gene variants in coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 85:55–60. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Chamberlain JC, Thorn JA, Oka K, Galton DJ and Stocks J: DNA polymorphisms at the lipoprotein lipase gene: associations in normal and hypertriglyceridaemic subjects. Atherosclerosis. 79:85–91. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Heinzmann C, Kirchgessner T, Kwiterovich PO, Ladias JA, Derby C, Antonarakis SE and Lusis AJ: DNA polymorphism haplotypes of the human lipoprotein lipase gene: possible association with high-density lipoprotein levels. Hum Genet. 86:578–584. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Mattu RK, Needham EW, Morgan R, Rees A, Hackshaw AK, Stocks J, Elwood PC and Galton DJ: DNA variants at the LPL gene locus associate with angiographically defined severity of atherosclerosis and serum lipoprotein levels in a Welsh population. Arterioscler Thromb. 14:1090–1097. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Chamberlain JC, Thorn JA, Morgan R, Bishop A, Stocks J, Rees A, Oka K and Galton DJ: Genetic variation at the lipoprotein lipase gene associates with coronary arteriosclerosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 285:275–279. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Corella D, Guillen M, Saiz C, Portoles O, Sabater A, Folch J and Ordovas JM: Associations of LPL and APOC3 gene polymorphisms on plasma lipids in a Mediterranean population: interaction with tobacco smoking and the APOE locus. J Lipid Res. 43:416–427. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Razzaghi H, Aston CE, Hamman RF and Kamboh MI: Genetic screening of the lipoprotein lipase gene for mutations associated with high triglyceride/low HDL-cholesterol levels. Hum Genet. 107:257–267. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Komurcu-Bayrak E, Onat A, Poda M, Humphries SE, Acharya J, Hergenc G, Coban N, Can G and Erginel-Unaltuna N: The S447X variant of lipoprotein lipase gene is associated with metabolic syndrome and lipid levels among Turks. Clin Chim Acta. 383:110–115. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Abu-Amero KK, Wyngaard CA, Al-Boudari OM, Kambouris M and Dzimiri N: Lack of association of lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms with coronary artery disease in the Saudi Arab population. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 127:597–600. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Clee SM, Bissada N, Miao F, Miao L, Marais AD, Henderson HE, Steures P, McManus J, McManus B, LeBoeuf RC, et al: Plasma and vessel wall lipoprotein lipase have different roles in atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res. 41:521–531. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Lee J, Tan CS, Chia KS, Tan CE, Chew SK, Ordovas JM and Tai ES: The lipoprotein lipase S447X polymorphism and plasma lipids: interactions with APOE polymorphisms, smoking, and alcohol consumption. J Lipid Res. 45:1132–1139. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Wung SF, Kulkarni MV, Pullinger CR, Malloy MJ, Kane JP and Aouizerat BE: The lipoprotein lipase gene in combined hyperlipidemia: evidence of a protective allele depletion. Lipids Health Dis. 5:192006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Chen Q, Razzaghi H, Demirci FY and Kamboh MI: Functional significance of lipoprotein lipase HindIII polymorphism associated with the risk of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 200:102–108. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Wang XL, McCredie RM and Wilcken DE: Common DNA polymorphisms at the lipoprotein lipase gene. Association with severity of coronary artery disease and diabetes. Circulation. 93:1339–1345. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Georges JL, Regis-Bailly A, Salah D, Rakotovao R, Siest G, Visvikis S and Tiret L: Family study of lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms and plasma triglyceride levels. Genet Epidemiol. 13:179–192. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Yamana K, Yanagi H, Hirano C, Kobayashi K, Tanaka M, Tomura S, Tsuchiya S and Hamaguchi H: Genetic polymorphisms and mutations of lipoprotein lipase gene in Japanese schoolchildren with hypoalphaalipoproteinemia. J Atheroscler Thromb. 4:97–101. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Ye P, Pei L and Wang S: Polymorphisms of the human lipoprotein lipase gene: possible association with lipid levels in patients with coronary heart disease in Beijing area. Chin Med Sci J. 11:157–161. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Jemaa R, Tuzet S, Portos C, Betoulle D, Apfelbaum M and Fumeron F: Lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms: associations with hypertriglyceridemia and body mass index in obese people. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 19:270–274. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

47 

Humphries SE, Nicaud V, Margalef J, Tiret L and Talmud PJ: Lipoprotein lipase gene variation is associated with a paternal history of premature coronary artery disease and fasting and postprandial plasma triglycerides: the European Atherosclerosis Research Study (EARS). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 18:526–534. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Henderson HE, Kastelein JJ, Zwinderman AH, Gagne E, Jukema JW, Reymer PW, Groenemeyer BE, Lie KI, Bruschke AV, Hayden MR and Jansen H: Lipoprotein lipase activity is decreased in a large cohort of patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with changes in lipids and lipoproteins. J Lipid Res. 40:735–743. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

49 

Gagne SE, Larson MG, Pimstone SN, Schaefer EJ, Kastelein JJ, Wilson PW, Ordovas JM and Hayden MR: A common truncation variant of lipoprotein lipase (Ser447X) confers protection against coronary heart disease: the Framingham Offspring Study. Clin Genet. 55:450–454. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Groenemeijer BE, Hallman MD, Reymer PW, Gagne E, Kuivenhoven JA, Bruin T, Jansen H, Lie KI, Bruschke AV, Boerwinkle E, et al: Genetic variant showing a positive interaction with beta-blocking agents with a beneficial influence on lipoprotein lipase activity, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in coronary artery disease patients. The Ser447-stop substitution in the lipoprotein lipase gene. REGRESS Study Group. Circulation. 95:2628–2635. 1997.

51 

Alper AT, Hasdemir H, Sahin S, Onturk E, Akyol A, Nurkalem Z, Cakmak N, Erdinler I and Gurkan K: The relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with metabolic syndrome. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 36:376–381. 2008.

52 

Goodarzi MO, Guo X, Taylor KD, Quinones MJ, Samayoa C, Yang H, Saad MF, Palotie A, Krauss RM, Hsueh WA and Rotter JI: Determination and use of haplotypes: ethnic comparison and association of the lipoprotein lipase gene and coronary artery disease in Mexican-Americans. Genet Med. 5:322–327. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-August 2013
Volume 1 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Daoud MS, Ataya FS, Fouad D, Alhazzani A, Shehata AI and Al‑Jafari AA: Associations of three lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms, lipid profiles and coronary artery disease. Biomed Rep 1: 573-582, 2013
APA
Daoud, M.S., Ataya, F.S., Fouad, D., Alhazzani, A., Shehata, A.I., & Al‑Jafari, A.A. (2013). Associations of three lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms, lipid profiles and coronary artery disease. Biomedical Reports, 1, 573-582. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2013.126
MLA
Daoud, M. S., Ataya, F. S., Fouad, D., Alhazzani, A., Shehata, A. I., Al‑Jafari, A. A."Associations of three lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms, lipid profiles and coronary artery disease". Biomedical Reports 1.4 (2013): 573-582.
Chicago
Daoud, M. S., Ataya, F. S., Fouad, D., Alhazzani, A., Shehata, A. I., Al‑Jafari, A. A."Associations of three lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms, lipid profiles and coronary artery disease". Biomedical Reports 1, no. 4 (2013): 573-582. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2013.126