Association between MMP-2 expression and prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignant tumors and the second cause of cancer in males (1,2). Due to the changes of population ages and diet structure, the global incidence of PCa has increased annually. The pathogenesis of PCa remains to be fully elucidated. Therefore, identifying a marker with a high correlation with occurrence and development of PCa is important for early diagnosis and treatment of PCa.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a series of protein hydrolases, which are closely associated with tumor growth, invasion and metastasis (3,4). MMPs can degrade the extracellular matrix (ECM), and can control the formation of tumor blood vessels (5). They have numerous subtypes, and MMP-2 is one of the most researched. There are a number of studies regarding the association between MMP-2 and PCa, which showed that the serum MMP-2 level was significantly higher compared to the control subjects (6–9). However, the impact of MMP-2 expression on the progress of PCa patients remains disputed. Certain studies have shown that MMP-2 has a high expression level in PCa; however, the sample sizes of these studies were small, or they were not contrasted further to the case group. Thus, the present meta-analysis was performed to explore the association of the level of MMP-2 expression and PCa.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

The following electronic databases were comprehensively searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure performed until July 2015. The following search terms were used: ‘MMP-2’ or ‘matrix metalloproteinase-2’, ‘prostate cancer’ or ‘prostate tumor’ or ‘prostate’. Subsequently, the literature was retrieved for further screening.

Study selection

The following criteria was used to evaluate the retrieval literature, which is consistent with the analysis included in the request: It should be the original and independent research; it must be the malignant tumor originating in the prostate; the association between MMP-2 expression and PCa should be shown; it must be a case-control study, with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as the control; the MMP-2 expression should be detected in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues. Simultaneously, the following exclusion criteria was used: Cell lines or animals were used; review articles; and the data was incomplete.

Data extraction

Data were extracted from the included studies as follows: Surname of the first author, the year of publishing, country, median age of patients, study sample size, the percentage of MMP-2 positive, survival outcomes, method of hazard ratio (HR) estimation, method of survival analysis, HR and 95% confidence interval (CI), and odds ratio (OR). Two investigators (Tiancheng Xie and Binbin Dong) extracted the data independently. Any disagreement regarding data was resolved by another investigator (Yangye Yan) to adjudicate the result.

Study quality

Two independent authors (Tiancheng Xie and Binbin Dong) evaluated the quality of the included studies in the meta-analysis, according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies. The NOS is from 0 to 9 stars. Any controversy was solved by discussion with the third investigator (Yangye Yan) to adjudicate any disagreement.

Statistical analysis

Heterogeneity was analyzed by calculating the Q test statistics. When the data suggest P>0.10 with no significant heterogeneity, the fixed effects model was used, otherwise, the random effects model was employed. Due to the rare incidence rate of PCa, HR could be approximately equal to OR. Therefore, OR was used instead of HR. Egger's funnel plot was explored to identify if there was any evidence of publication bias (10).

Results

Information from the literature

Based on the above search strategy, 395 relevant studies were identified. Subsequently, the initial screening occurred by reading the title and abstract of these retrieved studies. A total of 355 studies were excluded as they did not focus on the association of MMP-2 expression and PCa. Following this, 1 study was excluded as it was not associated to MMP-2 or PCa. Following reading of the remaining studies, 29 were excluded as they were continuous variables or others form of data, or non-comprehensive data. In addition, 2 studies were excluded that were not case-control studies. Finally, 8 case-control studies (2 in English and 6 in Chinese) were included in the meta-analysis (9,11–17). The selection process is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Flowchart presenting the steps of the literature search and selection. MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase-2.

Study characteristics

All the studies were published between 2005 and 2014. There were 7 studies of the Asian population (9,11–13,15–17) and 1 of the Caucasian population (14). A total of 7 studies compared the positive rate of MMP-2 between the PCa and BPH groups, and 5 of these compared the MMP-2 positive rate subdivided by the Gleason score in the cancer group (11,12,15–17).

Furthermore, in the PCa group, 2 studies compared the positive rate of MMP-2 between low and high serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) groups (12,15), and 2 studies compared the positive rate of MMP-2 between clinical stages (Jewett stages) AB and CD groups (11,16). An average NOS score of 6 indicated a reliable quality. The characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table I.

Table I. Characteristics of the eligible studies in the meta-analysis.

Table I.

Characteristics of the eligible studies in the meta-analysis.

									Subgroups, n
			Sample size, n		Age, years		Gleason score (in case)		PSA		Clinical stages
First author, year	Ethnicity	Source of controls	Case	Control	Case	Control	Low (≤7)	High (>7)	Low	High	AB	CD	(Refs.)
Ma, 2014	Asian	HB	30	60	67	65	24	36	25	35	N	N	(12)
Li, 2013	Asian	HB	20	78	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	(13)
Escaff, 2011	Caucasian	HB	50	133	54–70	44–79	N	N	N	N	N	N	(14)
Jia, 2010	Asian	HB	20	40	59	81	26	14	N	N	15	25	(11)
Wu, 2009	Asian	HB	20	48	N	N	33	15	N	N	N	N	(17)
Zhong, 2008	Asian	HB	62	15	73.9±12.1	N	N	N	N	N	N	N	(9)
Wu, 2005	Asian	HB	12	46	<40	53–70	39	7	N	N	26	20	(16)
Zhang, 2005	Asian	HB	10	51	34 (17)	31 (20)	34	17	31	20	N	N	(15)

[i] PSA, prostate-specific antigen; HB, hospital-based; N, none; AB and CD, 4 clinical stages (Jewett stages).

Meta-analysis

There were 8 studies with a total of 498 cases and 177 controls that compared the differences of the MMP-2 positive rate between case-control groups. There was no significant heterogeneity (I2=0%, P=0.55), and the pooled OR was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06–0.15; Z=10.58; P<0.00001). The results showed that the MMP-2 expression was significantly associated with PCa (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Significant association of matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression with prostate cancer (PCa). BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; CI, confidence interval.

There were 5 studies that compared the differences in the positive rate of MMP-2 in the Gleason score high and low groups. The combined OR was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.18–0.68; Z =3.09; P=0.002) with no significant heterogeneity (I2=7%, P=0.37). Therefore, the expression level of MMP-2 has a positive association with the Gleason score of patients (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Significant association of matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression with the Gleason score of patients. CI, confidence interval.

In addition, there were 2 subgroup analyses. One was regarding serum PSA, and it explored whether MMP-2 has a correlation between high and low serum PSA. The heterogeneity was not significant (I2=56%, P=0.13), and the pooled OR was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.30–1.66; Z=0.80; P=0.43). Another compared the positive rate of MMP-2 between clinical stages AB and CD. The pooled OR was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.12–0.82; Z=2.36; P=0.02) without significant heterogeneity (I2=29%, P=0.23). These results suggested that MMP-2 was significantly correlated with clinical stages, but not significantly correlated with serum PSA (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Significant association of matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression with clinical stages, but no significant correlation with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). CI, confidence interval.

In order to test whether the final result of this meta-analysis was affected by individual study and gauge the stability of the results, a sensitivity analysis was conducted (Fig. 5). The pooled OR in the meta-analysis was not effect by single study. The result of Egger's regression test showed the asymmetrical distribution in the funnel plot in the positive rate of MMP-2 between high and low Gleason score groups (Egger's test, t=−2.00).

Figure 5. Funnel plot of publication bias on the differences of matrix metalloproteinase-2. Expression between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer patients. OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

Worldwide, the incidence of PCa ranked second in all male malignant tumors (18). In the USA, the incidence of PCa has been higher compared to lung cancer, and it became the first tumor hazard in male health. In Asia, the incidence of PCa is much lower compared to Europe, America and other developed countries. However, with the development of the economy and technology, and changes to life and eating habits, the incidence of PCa is in a growing trend in recent years, and the growth rate is higher than the developed countries in Europe and America.

Early PCa often has no symptoms, and it is always diagnosed in the advanced stage following the appearance of symptoms (19). It will lose some selectivity for treatment, and the prognosis is poor. Therefore, how to early diagnose of PCa and monitor the prognosis of PCa is extremely important.

Clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of PCa and the malignant degree, Gleason score of PCa risk grade, and the prognosis have an important reference value. In PCa TNM staging, lymph node metastasis of judgment depends mainly on the computed tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or biopsy. Open or laparoscopic lymph node dissection is the gold standard for N staging. However, the specificity of CT, MRI and lymph node biopsy are invasive examinations, which certain patients find it difficult to accept. Currently, PSA is widely applied in the clinic, and it has an important role in the diagnosis of PCa; however, when the PSA value is in the 4–10 ng/ml gray zone, it will reduce the sensitivity and specificity of PSA.

MMPs are ECM-degrading enzymes belonging to a family of zinc- and calcium-dependent endopeptidases. They are important for cancer invasion and metastasis (20) and they have a significant role for ECM degradation (21,22). MMP-2 is one of the MMP families. It has a critical role in tumor growth and metastasis (23–25). There are studies that have identified that the MMP-2 content in the serum is associated with the grading and malignant degree of PCa (26,27). Certain studies observed that MMP-2 may have the potential to be used as a molecular marker for PCa (7). MMP-2 may be used as a predictor of PCa (8). In addition, certain studies showed an increased or decreased expression level of MMP-2 through the regulation of an associated MMP-2 pathway, and tumor cell invasion could be promoted or inhibited in PCa cells (28).

Recently, the association between MMP-2 expression and PCa has been investigated by certain studies. However, there remain certain disputes regarding the result, and the sample sizes are small. Additionally, there is no meta-analysis reporting the association of MMP-2 expression and PCa. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to explore the association between MMP-2 expression and PCa patients.

There are a total of 8 studies, including 498 cases and 177 controls, in this meta-analysis. Between the BPH and PCa groups, there was no significant heterogeneity (I2=0%, P=0.55), and the pooled OR was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06–0.15; Z=10.58; P<0.00001), indicating that MMP-2 overexpression was associated with PCa. The pooled OR with its 95% CI indicated that the expression of MMP-2 increased with the increase of the PCa Gleason score. Subgroup analysis showed that the expression of MMP-2 was positively correlated with clinical stage in PCa patients. Although the expression of MMP-2 was not significantly correlated with serum PSA, MMP-2 may be a potential marker in PCa patients. It may be used in early diagnosis and the evaluation of prognosis regarding PCa.

Although a comprehensive search was performed, along with rigorous statistical data analysis, certain limitations remain. Firstly, the literature that was searched may predominantly accept their positive results, leading to expansion of the results of the meta-analysis. Secondly, certain studies were not included in the meta-analysis due to the non-uniform data standards. Thirdly, only studies written in Chinese or English were included in the meta-analysis even though there was no language restriction. Fourthly, the majority of the included studies are based on the population of Asian countries.

In conclusion, taken together the present meta-analysis showed that MMP-2 was highly expressed in PCa patients compared with BPH patients. The expression of MMP-2 was closely correlated with Gleason score and clinical stages in PCa patients. Therefore, MMP-2 can serve as an indicator in PCa patients. However, there are also certain limitations. The additional studies should explore the prognostic value of serum MMP-2 in PCa patients and clarify the prognostic significance of MMP-2 expression in PCa patients.

Acknowledgements

The present study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81370699). The authors acknowledge the reviewers for their comments on this study.

References