Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Biomedical Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 2049-9434 Online ISSN: 2049-9442
Journal Cover
November-2025 Volume 23 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
November-2025 Volume 23 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article Open Access

A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an in vitro model by downregulating RAD21 and β‑catenin

  • Authors:
    • Qingqing Chen
    • Yonghua Chen
    • Chaochun Zou
    • Chunlin Wang
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310052, P.R. China, Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Article Number: 172
    |
    Published online on: September 4, 2025
       https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2050
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) is a prevalent chromatinopathy, frequently caused by mutations in genes encoding cohesin complex components, with NIPBL being the most commonly affected. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of a 5'‑untranslated region (UTR) mutation (c.‑467C>T) in the NIPBL gene on gene expression and cohesin complex integrity. Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a heterozygous cell line harboring the NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation was generated. A combination of molecular biology techniques, including RNA secondary structure prediction and luciferase reporter assays, was employed to evaluate the effect of the mutation. These findings indicated that the 5'‑UTR mutation introduces an additional upstream open reading frame, leading to diminished expression levels of NIPBL protein. This decrease was associated with downregulation of RAD21, a pivotal component of the cohesin complex, and reduced β‑catenin levels, thereby affecting cell proliferation. The present study elucidates the significance of 5'‑UTR elements in regulating gene expression and the potential consequences of sequence variations within this region, demonstrating that a 5'‑UTR mutation in NIPBL contributes to CdLS by disrupting gene expression and cellular processes. These results advance the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CdLS.

Introduction

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS; OMIM 122470, 300590, 610759, 614701, 300882, 617116, 618736), also referred to as Brachmann-de Lange syndrome, is the most common disorder among the chromatinopathies, with a prevalence estimated between 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 30,000 live births (1). This condition is characterized by a variety of anomalies that affect the craniofacial region, musculoskeletal system, gastrointestinal tract and neurodevelopment (2). CdLS belongs to the group of disorders known as chromatinopathies, disorders caused by variants in proteins involved in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation, resulting in global dysregulation of gene expression (3). CdLS results from mutations in any of the seven genes that constitute the cohesin complex: NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, HDAC8, ANKRD11, MAU2, AFF2 and BRD4, each playing a role in the construction or regulation of the complex (4,5). The NIPBL gene mutation is most frequently implicated in CdLS cases, particularly those exhibiting the typical phenotype, accounting for ~60-70% of instances (6). Most NIPBL mutations associated with CdLS are located in the coding region, while a few are in the 5'-UTR (untranslated region) (7-9). Previously, a novel mutation c.-467C>T was identified in the NIPBL gene, which is associated with CdLS. Cs (10). Although the 5'-UTR mutation in NIPBL linked to CdLS is recognized for introducing a novel upstream open reading frame (uORF) (7), the underlying pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear.

The 5'-UTR includes structural elements and uORFs, which are essential for regulating translation. The extended length and intricacy of 5'-UTRs underscore the significance of post-transcriptional and translational mechanisms in modulating the expression levels of the proteins they encode, particularly in the context of dose-sensitive genes (11). The NIPBL protein, with >2,500 amino acids, is crucial for the function of the cohesin complex and its role in chromatin organization, gene regulation and developmental processes (12,13). In total, ~10% of CdLS cases involve mutations in cohesin regulators and components, indicating that NIPBL mutations may contribute to CdLS pathogenesis by disrupting cohesin function (14). The expression levels of the NIPBL gene are critical, as even minor decreases in them can lead to CdLS, indicating its dosage sensitivity (14,15). Cells derived from patients with CdLS with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in the NIPBL gene, as well as mice heterozygous for a Nipbl mutation, exhibit decreased overall or regional cohesin association and impaired three-dimensional interactions within the chromatin structure, which is consistent with the role of NIPBL as a component that assists in the attachment of cohesion (16-19).

The present study established a heterozygous cell line with a point mutation to investigate the impact of the 5'-UTR mutation on NIPBL gene expression, cohesin complexes and the transcription of genes involved in cellular development. The present study aimed to further elucidate the preliminary mechanisms by which the 5'-UTR mutation of the NIPBL gene contributes to CdLS development.

Materials and methods

RNA secondary structure prediction

The RNA secondary structure was computed, and the folding energy for RNA sequences was estimated using the RNAfold tool, which is part of the ViennaRNA package (version 2.6.4), as previously described (20).

Cell culture and knock-in cell line construction

The 293t cell line was sourced from the American Type Culture Collection repository of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. These cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Shanghai ExCell Biology, Inc.) and cultured at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. A variant of the 293t cell line, designated as NIPBL-mut, was engineered to harbor a 5'-UTR mutation in the NIPBL gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The sgRNA targeting the NIPBL 5'-UTR was designed with CRISPOR: web-based design tool (https://crispor.tefor.net; Kircher Lab, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany). The NIPBL-specific sgRNA sequence (5'-TTTGTTCTGAGAGGGAGAGA-3'), designed to target the first exon of the NIPBL gene, was cloned into the PX459 vector, which was acquired from Addgene, Inc. The sgRNA-PX459 construct (2 µg in 6 well plate) and the homology repair template (500 ng; 5'-GTCGGCATTTTGTTCTGAGAGGGAGAGATGGAACGAGA-3') were co-transfected into 293t cells using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C for 36 h. Following transfection, the cells were subjected to selection with 2 µg/ml puromycin for 48 h, after which the antibiotic-resistant cells were single-cell cloned in the same medium. Genomic DNA was extracted from the edited cells (Tissue DNA Kit; Omega Bio-Tek, Inc.) and a 517-bp fragment spanning the entire sgRNA insertion site (chr5: 36,876,519-36,877,036, hg38) was amplified with PrimeSTAR® HS DNA Polymerase (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) under standard high-fidelity cycling conditions (98˚C for 30 sec; 35 cycle x [98˚C for 10 sec, 63˚C for 20 sec, 72˚C for 30 sec]; 72˚C for 2 min). The purified 517-bp product was then sent to Tsingke Biological Technology for Sanger sequencing with the forward PCR primer (5'-GCAAACGTCGCTCTGAAGCAT-3') and a reverse primer (5'-CGAGAAGACAAATCGTTGCT-3'). Chromatograms were aligned to the reference gene sequence with SnapGene to confirm 100% identity and absence of indels. The template was verified on three separate occasions to confirm sequence identity.

Luciferase reporter assay

The procedures for plasmid construction and dual-luciferase reporter analysis were conducted as previously described by the authors (10). The data were standardized to account for transfection efficiency by quantifying the activities of firefly and Renilla luciferases, with the results presented as a ratio of these two luciferase activities. Most control samples were set to a value of 100% for normalization purposes. The results are depicted as the mean values ± standard deviations, derived from triplicate experiments.

Immunofluorescence

WT and mut 293t cells were seeded onto glass coverslips in their respective growth media. The cells were cultured for the specified number of days until they reached ~80% confluence. The cell layers were then fixed with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.5) at room temperature (RT, 25˚C) for 20 min. Following fixation, the coverslips were permeabilized with a 0.2% Triton X-100 solution for 15 min and then were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 1 h at RT. Primary antibodies targeting NIPBL (cat. no. sc-374625; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), diluted to a ratio of 1:100 in 1% BSA, were then applied, and the solution was incubated overnight (for >18 h) at 4˚C in a light-protected environment. Subsequently, the Alexa Fluor 488 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) secondary antibodies (cat. no. ab150113; Abcam) were incubated for 1 h at RT. The cells were then stained at RT with 0.2 mg/ml DAPI for 7 min to visualize the nuclei. After staining, the slides were air-dried and mounted with anti-fade reagents to preserve the fluorescence. Finally, the samples were analyzed using a fluorescence microscope.

Cell fractionation

This process started with the collection of cells and their subsequent incubation in lysis buffer I, which is composed of 20 mM HEPES at a pH of 8.0, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5% NP-40 and protease inhibitors, for 10 min, under refrigeration at 4˚C and with the inclusion of protease inhibitors in all solutions. The mixture was centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 5 min after incubation. The supernatant, which was rich in cytosolic components, was then carefully separated and set aside. The remaining pellet was rinsed twice with PBS and then subjected to lysis using nucleus lysis buffer II, which is prepared by incorporating 0.5 M NaCl into lysis buffer I. After lysis, the nuclear lysate was allowed to chill on ice for 5 min before centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant, containing the nuclear components, was subsequently collected and preserved as the nuclear fraction.

Western blot analysis

Cells were subjected to lysis using RIPA buffer (cat. no. P0013C; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) supplemented with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The concentration of total proteins in the lysates was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Aliquots of 20 µg of protein samples were resolved using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 10% acrylamide gel and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were then blocked with a 5% skim milk in TBS-T at RT for 1 h. After blocking, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4˚C with a panel of primary antibodies targeting NIPBL (cat. no. sc-374625; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), α-Tubulin (cat. no. ab7291; Abcam), RAD21 (cat. no. DF7520; Abcam), SMC1A (cat. no. AF6439; Affinity Biosciences), CTNNB1 (cat. no. 8480; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and GAPDH (cat. no. ab8245; Abcam). Subsequently, the membranes were treated with HRP-Goat Anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) or HRP-Goat Anti-mouse IgG (H+L) secondary antibodies (BK-R050-50 µl or BK-M050-50 µl΄ Hangzhou Baoke Biotech Co., Ltd.), diluted at 1:5,000, for 1 h. The immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Hangzhou Fude Biological Technology Co., Ltd.) and their intensities were quantified through densitometric analysis using ImageJ 1.54f (National Institutes of Health). The following primary antibodies were used: NIPBL (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.); α-Tubulin and GAPDH (1:1,000; both from Abcam); RAD21 and SMC1A (1:1,000; both from Affinity Biosciences) and CTNNB1(1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.).

EDU staining

The DNA replication in 293t cells was detected using an EdU staining kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), following the manufacturer's instructions. Initially, 293t cells were plated in 24-well plates and cultured for 12 h until they reached a confluency of ~50%. Subsequently, the cells were treated with a 10 µM concentration of EdU solution, which was incorporated into the cell medium and left for 2 h. After this incubation period, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 15 min and then rinsed three times (5 min each) with PBS to remove any unincorporated EdU. A click reaction solution containing Azide 488 was then added to the cells and incubated for 30 min to facilitate the detection of EdU incorporation. To visualize the cell nuclei, 0.2 mg/ml DAPI staining was performed at RT for 7 min, and the stained cells were subsequently examined using a fluorescence microscope.

Statistical analyses

The experiments were repeated at least three times unless otherwise indicated. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired two-tailed t-tests in GraphPad Prism 10.1.2 (GraphPad Software; Dotmatics). Most control groups were normalized to 100%. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Impact of a 5'-UTR mutation on uORFs

To assess the impact of the c.-467C>T variant on post-transcriptional regulation, the 5'-UTR of NIPBL was analyzed for uORFs using NCBI ORFfinder. A total of Four uORFs were identified in the wild-type (WT) sequence, whereas the mutant harbored an additional uORF, yielding a total of five (Fig. 1A). The de novo uORF initiates at a strong Kozak sequence (GAGAUGG) (21) and spans 53 codons, terminating upstream of the NIPBL start codon (Fig. 1B). Secondary structure prediction with ViennaRNA revealed a complex secondary RNA structure for the mutated 5'-UTR, characterized by numerous stem-loops (Fig. 1C), with no significant difference in the lowest free energy between the WT (-2548.10 kcal/mol) and the mutant (-2546.70 kcal/mol) for the initial 10,000 bases.

Impact of 5'-UTR mutation on uORFs.
(A) Identification and comparison of uORFs between the WT and mut
variants of the 5'-UTR of the NIPBL gene. (B) Kozak sequence
within the 5'-UTR of the mut variant of the NIPBL gene. (C)
Predicted secondary structures of the RNA for the mutated 5'-UTR of
the NIPBL gene, and the WT RNA predicted secondary structure
is shown on the left and the mut structure on the right. UTR,
untranslated region; uORF, upstream open reading frame; WT,
wild-type; mut, mutant.

Figure 1

Impact of 5'-UTR mutation on uORFs. (A) Identification and comparison of uORFs between the WT and mut variants of the 5'-UTR of the NIPBL gene. (B) Kozak sequence within the 5'-UTR of the mut variant of the NIPBL gene. (C) Predicted secondary structures of the RNA for the mutated 5'-UTR of the NIPBL gene, and the WT RNA predicted secondary structure is shown on the left and the mut structure on the right. UTR, untranslated region; uORF, upstream open reading frame; WT, wild-type; mut, mutant.

Impact of uORF variants on NIPBL expression

The CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated editing introduced the c.-467C>T variant into the endogenous NIPBL locus, yielding heterozygous NIPBL-mut cells (Fig. 2A). A dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to quantify the transcriptional impact of the variant. Compared with the WT, the mutant (mut) 5'-UTR produced a modest but significant reduction in reporter activity (1±0.046 vs. 0.693±0.019; P=0.0034; Fig. 2B). Consistently, immunoblot analysis revealed a ~50% decrease in endogenous NIPBL protein levels in mutant cells relative to isogenic controls (0.211±0.027 vs. 0.100±0.016; P=0.0225; Fig. 2C). Immunofluorescence staining further showed that the subcellular distribution of NIPBL was unaltered by the mutation. However, the fluorescence intensity in the mutant cells was significantly reduced by 40% compared with that in the WT (103.000±2.767 vs. 67.680±3.323; P=0.0012; Fig. 2D).

5'-untranslated region mutation of
the NIPBL gene affects expression. (A) Schematic
illustration depicting the generation of NIPBL-mut cells
using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. (B) Luciferase reporter assay
measuring the transcriptional activity of the NIPBL gene in
WT vs. mutant groups. (C) Western blot comparing NIPBL protein
levels in WT and mut cells. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of
NIPBL in wild-type and mutant cells; nuclei were counterstained
with DAPI (blue). Fluorescence intensity was quantified and
normalized to the WT level. Scale bar, 100 µm. Data are presented
as the mean ± SEM and the value of NIPBL-WT was normalized as 100%.
**P<0.01. WT, wild-type; mut, mutant.

Figure 2

5'-untranslated region mutation of the NIPBL gene affects expression. (A) Schematic illustration depicting the generation of NIPBL-mut cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. (B) Luciferase reporter assay measuring the transcriptional activity of the NIPBL gene in WT vs. mutant groups. (C) Western blot comparing NIPBL protein levels in WT and mut cells. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of NIPBL in wild-type and mutant cells; nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Fluorescence intensity was quantified and normalized to the WT level. Scale bar, 100 µm. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM and the value of NIPBL-WT was normalized as 100%. **P<0.01. WT, wild-type; mut, mutant.

NIPBL haploinsufficiency downregulates RAD21

It was next examined whether the NIPBL mutation affects the steady-state abundance of core cohesin subunits. Whole-cell lysates revealed a significant reduction in RAD21 protein (1.020±0.257 vs. 0.449±0.141; P=0.0297; Fig. 3A). To determine compartment-specific changes, nuclei and cytoplasm were fractionated. Consistent with our previous findings, NIPBL protein levels decreased in both the nucleus (0.476±0.070 vs. 0.199±0.070, P=0.0489 Fig. 3B) and cytoplasm (0.623±0.081 vs. 0.354±0.021, P=0.0326, Fig. 3B). Similarly, RAD21 expression in cellular fractions decreased in the mut compared with the WT (Cytoplasm, 0.283±0.042 vs. 0.103±0.025; P=0.0201; nucleus 0.224±0.041 vs. 0.067±0.013; P=0.0205; Fig. 3B). By contrast, SMC1A levels were comparable between genotypes in both compartments (Fig. 3B).

Cohesin complex integrity. (A) RAD21
protein levels in WT and mut cells. (B) Western blot analysis of
cohesin complex proteins (NIPBL, RAD21 and SMC1A) in cytoplasmic
(Cyto) and nuclear (Nuc) fractions of wild-type and mutant cells.
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM and the value of NIPBL-WT was
normalized as 100%. *P<0.05. WT, wild-type; mut,
mutant; ns, not significant.

Figure 3

Cohesin complex integrity. (A) RAD21 protein levels in WT and mut cells. (B) Western blot analysis of cohesin complex proteins (NIPBL, RAD21 and SMC1A) in cytoplasmic (Cyto) and nuclear (Nuc) fractions of wild-type and mutant cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM and the value of NIPBL-WT was normalized as 100%. *P<0.05. WT, wild-type; mut, mutant; ns, not significant.

Reduction in NIPBL expression leads to decreased β-catenin and impacts cell proliferation

EdU staining assays were conducted to quantify the proliferative capacity ofNIPBL-mutant cells. Compared with WT controls, the fraction of EdU-positive cells were significantly lower in the mutant population (49.360±1.384 vs. 40.200±2.154; P=0.0025; Fig. 4A). Western blot analysis revealed that total β-catenin protein levels were significantly reduced in mut cells compared with WT controls (1.129±0.039 vs. 0.692±0.028, P=0.0008; Fig. 4B). Since nuclear accumulation of β-catenin is required for canonical Wnt signaling, β-catenin was further resolved into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. Nuclear β-catenin was significantly decreased in the mut group (2.301±0.328 vs. 1.213±0.152; P=0.0398; Fig. 4C); cytoplasmic β-catenin levels remained unaffected in both the WT and mutant groups.

NIPBL downregulation reduces
β-catenin levels, thereby affecting cell proliferation. (A) EdU
assays assessing proliferation in WT and NIPBL-mut cells;
EdU-positive nuclei were quantified and normalized to total DAPI
counts. Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Total β-catenin protein levels in WT
and mut cells. (C) Subcellular β-catenin levels in WT and mut cells
(cytoplasmic vs. nuclear fractions). Data are presented as the mean
± SEM and the value of NIPBL-WT was normalized as 100%.
*P<0.05, **P<0.01 and
***P<0.001. WT, wild-type; mut, mutant; ns, not
significant.

Figure 4

NIPBL downregulation reduces β-catenin levels, thereby affecting cell proliferation. (A) EdU assays assessing proliferation in WT and NIPBL-mut cells; EdU-positive nuclei were quantified and normalized to total DAPI counts. Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Total β-catenin protein levels in WT and mut cells. (C) Subcellular β-catenin levels in WT and mut cells (cytoplasmic vs. nuclear fractions). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM and the value of NIPBL-WT was normalized as 100%. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. WT, wild-type; mut, mutant; ns, not significant.

Discussion

In our previous publication, a novel NIPBL variant (c.-467 C>T) was identified in a Chinese boy affected by CdLS (10). In the present study, it was demonstrated that this mutation creates a strong uORF that represses NIPBL translation without affecting mRNA stability. Mechanistically, the uORF stalls ribosome scanning, preventing initiation at the downstream NIPBL start codon (22). Critically, reduced NIPBL diminishes cohesin loading onto chromatin, disrupting long-range chromatin interactions, a core defect in CdLS pathogenesis (23,24). These data establish uORF-mediated translational inhibition as a recurrent mechanism underlying NIPBL haploinsufficiency in CdLS.

Reduced NIPBL dosage, in turn, perturbs the cohesin complex. Western blotting and subcellular-fractionation analyses revealed a decrease in RAD21 protein. This finding contrasts with some studies in which NIPBL mutations altered cohesin chromosomal occupancy without affecting total cohesin subunit abundance (25,26). However, it aligns with recent evidence from small-cell lung cancer showing that NIPBL protein promoted RAD21 gene transcription by enhancing H3K27 demethylation via recruiting lysine demethylase 6B to the RAD21 gene promoter (27), reconciling our findings with the emerging view that NIPBL dosage can exert both occupancy and abundance-dependent effects on cohesin. Because cohesin dysfunction underlies the group of disorders termed chromatinopathies, CdLS being the archetype, the observed RAD21 downregulation provides a direct mechanistic link between the NIPBL 5'-UTR mutation and CdLS pathogenesis (28,29). These findings suggest that downregulation of RAD21 may be caused by pathogenic mutations in the NIPBL 5'-UTR. This interpretation is further supported by clinical genetics: Heterozygous RAD21 variants can themselves cause CdLS, but the resulting phenotype is typically mild (30-32), mirroring the attenuated presentation associated with NIPBL 5'-UTR mutations. Thus, converging molecular and clinical evidence indicates that reduced NIPBL dosage elicits RAD21-mediated disruption of cohesin that contributes to the milder end of the CdLS phenotypic spectrum.

To determine how NIPBL-RAD21 deficiency translates into cellular pathology, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway was interrogated. Functional assays revealed modest yet consistent defects in cell proliferation that were accompanied by a marked reduction in nuclear β-catenin. This result is consistent with the downregulation of the classical Wnt signaling pathway observed in the CdLS zebrafish model (33,34), and extends it to human cells. Importantly, this finding also supports the notion that NIPBL or RAD21 knockdown leads to a decrease in cell proliferation ability, suggesting a causal rather than correlative relationship (15,33,35). Supporting this notion, transcriptomic profiling of CdLS-associated cardiac dysplasia demonstrates that RAD21 depletion alone is sufficient to derail Wnt signaling (8). Consequently, it was hypothesized that NIPBL mutations trigger the downregulation of RAD21, leading to the dysregulation of β-catenin and ultimately to defects in cell proliferation.

In conclusion, it was demonstrated that a single 5'-UTR variant (c.-467C>T) creates a de novo uORF, quantitatively reduces NIPBL and cohesin levels, and thereby disrupts Wnt signalling and proliferation. These findings establish a direct molecular link between a non-coding mutation and mild Cornelia de Lange phenotypes.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82270837).

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article.

Authors' contributions

CW and CZ conceived and designed the research. QC and YC performed the experiments and analyzed the data. QC, YC and CW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. QC and YC confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Garcia P, Fernandez-Hernandez R, Cuadrado A, Coca I, Gomez A, Maqueda M, Latorre-Pellicer A, Puisac B, Ramos FJ, Sandoval J, et al: Disruption of NIPBL/Scc2 in cornelia de lange syndrome provokes cohesin genome-wide redistribution with an impact in the transcriptome. Nat Commun. 12(4551)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Caplan IF, Ye M and Pearlman AN: Management of nasal polyposis in pediatric patients with cornelia de lange syndrome: A case series and literature review. Ear Nose Throat J: Sep 24, 2024 (Epub ahead of print).

3 

Parenti I and Kaiser FJ: Cornelia de lange syndrome as paradigm of chromatinopathies. Front Neurosci. 15(774950)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Parenti I, Diab F, Gil SR, Mulugeta E, Casa V, Berutti R, Brouwer RWW, Dupé V, Eckhold J, Graf E, et al: MAU2 and NIPBL variants impair the heterodimerization of the cohesin loader subunits and cause cornelia de lange syndrome. Cell Rep. 31(107647)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Lucia-Campos C, Parenti I, Latorre-Pellicer A, Gil-Salvador M, Bestetti I, Finelli P, Larizza L, Arnedo M, Ayerza-Casas A, Del Rincón J, et al: An intragenic duplication in the AFF2 gene associated with cornelia de lange syndrome phenotype. Front Genet. 15(1472543)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Shangguan H and Chen R: Phenotypes of cornelia de lange syndrome caused by non-cohesion genes: Novel variants and literature review. Front Pediatr. 10(940294)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Coursimault J, Rovelet-Lecrux A, Cassinari K, Brischoux-Boucher E, Saugier-Veber P, Goldenberg A, Lecoquierre F, Drouot N, Richard AC, Vera G, et al: uORF-introducing variants in the 5'UTR of the NIPBL gene as a cause of cornelia de lange syndrome. Hum Mutat. 43:1239–1248. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Schuster K, Leeke B, Meier M, Wang Y, Newman T, Burgess S and Horsfield JA: A neural crest origin for cohesinopathy heart defects. Hum Mol Genet. 24:7005–7016. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Teresa-Rodrigo ME, Eckhold J, Puisac B, Pozojevic J, Parenti I, Baquero-Montoya C, Gil-Rodríguez MC, Braunholz D, Dalski A, Hernández-Marcos M, et al: Identification and functional characterization of two intronic NIPBL mutations in two patients with cornelia de lange syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2016(8742939)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Chen Y, Chen Q, Yuan K, Zhu J, Fang Y, Yan Q and Wang C: A novel de novo variant in 5' UTR of the NIPBL associated with cornelia de lange syndrome. Genes (Basel). 13(740)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Wieder N, D'Souza EN, Martin-Geary AC, Lassen FH, Talbot-Martin J, Fernandes M, Chothani SP, Rackham OJL, Schafer S, Aspden JL, et al: Differences in 5'untranslated regions highlight the importance of translational regulation of dosage sensitive genes. Genome Biol. 25(111)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Zhang S, Übelmesser N, Josipovic N, Forte G, Slotman JA, Chiang M, Gothe HJ, Gusmao EG, Becker C, Altmüller J, et al: RNA polymerase II is required for spatial chromatin reorganization following exit from mitosis. Sci Adv. 7(eabg8205)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Vitoria M, Landwerlin P, Diebold-Durand ML, Shaik TB, Durand A, Troesch E, Weber C, Brillet K, Lemée MV, Decroos C, et al: The cohesin ATPase cycle is mediated by specific conformational dynamics and interface plasticity of SMC1A and SMC3 ATPase domains. Cell Rep. 43(114656)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Panarotto M, Davidson IF, Litos G, Schleiffer A and Peters JM: Cornelia de Lange syndrome mutations in NIPBL can impair cohesin-mediated DNA loop extrusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 119(e2201029119)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Xu W, Ying Y, Shan L, Feng J, Zhang S, Gao Y, Xu X, Yao Y, Zhu C and Mao W: Enhanced expression of cohesin loading factor NIPBL confers poor prognosis and chemotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. J Transl Med. 13(153)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Higashi TL, Eickhoff P, Sousa JS, Locke J, Nans A, Flynn HR, Snijders AP, Papageorgiou G, O'Reilly N, Chen ZA, et al: A structure-based mechanism for DNA entry into the cohesin ring. Mol Cell. 79:917–933.e9. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Rinaldi L, Fettweis G, Kim S, Garcia DA, Fujiwara S, Johnson TA, Tettey TT, Ozbun L, Pegoraro G, Puglia M, et al: The glucocorticoid receptor associates with the cohesin loader NIPBL to promote long-range gene regulation. Sci Adv. 8(eabj8360)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Weiss FD, Calderon L, Wang YF, Georgieva R, Guo Y, Cvetesic N, Kaur M, Dharmalingam G, Krantz ID, Lenhard B, et al: Neuronal genes deregulated in cornelia de lange syndrome respond to removal and re-expression of cohesin. Nat Commun. 12(2919)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Luna-Peláez N, March-Díaz R, Ceballos-Chávez M, Guerrero-Martínez JA, Grazioli P, García-Gutiérrez P, Vaccari T, Massa V, Reyes JC and García-Domínguez M: The cornelia de lange syndrome-associated factor NIPBL interacts with BRD4 ET domain for transcription control of a common set of genes. Cell Death Dis. 10(548)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Fallmann J, Will S, Engelhardt J, Grüning B, Backofen R and Stadler PF: Recent advances in RNA folding. J Biotechnol. 261:97–104. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Ambrosini C, Destefanis E, Kheir E, Broso F, Alessandrini F, Longhi S, Battisti N, Pesce I, Dassi E, Petris G, et al: Translational enhancement by base editing of the Kozak sequence rescues haploinsufficiency. Nucleic Acids Res. 50:10756–10771. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Whiffin N, Karczewski KJ, Zhang X, Chothani S, Smith MJ, Evans DJ, Roberts AM, Quaife NM, Schafer S, Rackham O, et al: Characterising the loss-of-function impact of 5' untranslated region variants in 15,708 individuals. Nat Commun. 11(2523)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Mills JA, Herrera PS, Kaur M, Leo L, McEldrew D, Tintos-Hernandez JA, Rajagopalan R, Gagne A, Zhang Z, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR and Krantz ID: NIPBL(+/-) haploinsufficiency reveals a constellation of transcriptome disruptions in the pluripotent and cardiac states. Sci Rep. 8(1056)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Alonso-Gil D, Cuadrado A, Giménez-Llorente D, Rodríguez-Corsino M and Losada A: Different NIPBL requirements of cohesin-STAG1 and cohesin-STAG2. Nat Commun. 14(1326)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Newkirk DA, Chen YY, Chien R, Zeng W, Biesinger J, Flowers E, Kawauchi S, Santos R, Calof AL, Lander AD, et al: The effect of Nipped-B-like (Nipbl) haploinsufficiency on genome-wide cohesin binding and target gene expression: Modeling cornelia de lange syndrome. Clin Epigenetics. 9(89)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Mannini L, C Lamaze F, Cucco F, Amato C, Quarantotti V, Rizzo IM, Krantz ID, Bilodeau S and Musio A: Mutant cohesin affects RNA polymerase II regulation in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Sci Rep. 5(16803)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Xu X, Wang D, Xu W, Li H, Chen N, Li N, Yao Q, Chen W, Zhong J and Mao W: Author Correction: NIPBL-mediated RAD21 facilitates tumorigenicity by the PI3K pathway in non-small-cell lung cancer. Commun Biol. 7(397)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Pileggi S, La Vecchia M, Colombo EA, Fontana L, Colapietro P, Rovina D, Morotti A, Tabano S, Porta G, Alcalay M, et al: Cohesin mutations induce chromatin conformation perturbation of the H19/IGF2 imprinted region and gene expression dysregulation in cornelia de lange syndrome cell lines. Biomolecules. 11(1622)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Avagliano L, Parenti I, Grazioli P, Di Fede E, Parodi C, Mariani M, Kaiser FJ, Selicorni A, Gervasini C and Massa V: Chromatinopathies: A focus on Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Clin Genet. 97:3–11. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

De Falco A, De Brasi D, Della Monica M, Cesario C, Petrocchi S, Novelli A, D'Alterio G, Iolascon A, Capasso M and Piscopo C: A novel variant in RAD21 in cornelia de lange syndrome type 4: Case report and bioinformatic analysis. Genes (Basel). 14(119)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Yu R, Roseman S, Siegenfeld AP, Gardner Z, Nguyen SC, Tran KA, Joyce EF, Jain R, Liau BB, Krantz ID, et al: CTCF/RAD21 organize the ground state of chromatin-nuclear speckle association. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 32:1069–1080. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Yue X, Chen M, Ke X, Yang H, Gong F, Wang L, Duan L, Pan H and Zhu H: Clinical characteristics, genetic analysis, and literature review of cornelia de lange syndrome type 4 associated with a RAD21 variant. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 12(e70009)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Grazioli P, Parodi C, Mariani M, Bottai D, Di Fede E, Zulueta A, Avagliano L, Cereda A, Tenconi R, Wierzba J, et al: Lithium as a possible therapeutic strategy for Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Cell Death Discov. 7(34)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Gruca-Stryjak K, Doda-Nowak E, Dzierla J, Wróbel K, Szymankiewicz-Bręborowicz M and Mazela J: Advancing the clinical and molecular understanding of cornelia de lange syndrome: A multidisciplinary pediatric case series and review of the literature. J Clin Med. 13(2423)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Pallotta MM, Di Nardo M and Musio A: Synthetic lethality between cohesin and WNT signaling pathways in diverse cancer contexts. Cells. 13(608)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Chen Q, Chen Y, Zou C and Wang C: A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin. Biomed Rep 23: 172, 2025.
APA
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, C., & Wang, C. (2025). A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin. Biomedical Reports, 23, 172. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2050
MLA
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, C., Wang, C."A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin". Biomedical Reports 23.5 (2025): 172.
Chicago
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, C., Wang, C."A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin". Biomedical Reports 23, no. 5 (2025): 172. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2050
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chen Q, Chen Y, Zou C and Wang C: A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin. Biomed Rep 23: 172, 2025.
APA
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, C., & Wang, C. (2025). A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin. Biomedical Reports, 23, 172. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2050
MLA
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, C., Wang, C."A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin". Biomedical Reports 23.5 (2025): 172.
Chicago
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Zou, C., Wang, C."A Cornelia de Lange syndrome NIPBL 5'‑UTR mutation reduces cell proliferation in an <em>in vitro</em> model by downregulating RAD21 and &beta;‑catenin". Biomedical Reports 23, no. 5 (2025): 172. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2050
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team