International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Pharmacological properties of the ethnomedicinal plant Dodonaea viscosa: Anticancer potential and beyond (Review)
Continuous and rigorous assessment of the pharmacological potential of plants is essential for the discovery and development of novel anticancer and other therapeutic agents. Ongoing evaluation also ensures validation of traditional uses while optimizing efficacy and safety. The reporting of these evaluations serves to support innovation of the pharmaceutical landscape to advance evidence‑based medicine. Such is particularly important for research in cancer, a highly complex disease that remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Numerous conventional anticancer drugs are derived from natural products, highlighting the value of plants as a source of novel compounds with anticancer properties. The medicinal plant, Dodonaea viscosa (DV) is an evergreen shrub found in tropical and subtropical regions around the world, with a long history of use in traditional medicine. Different parts of the plant are used in diverse ways for a wide range of ailments by traditional healers. This review provides a comprehensive and updated summary of scientific investigations reporting on the anticancer and other therapeutic potential of DV. Investigations to date have primarily assessed whole DV aqueous and/or organic extracts of various solvents, with only few investigations of fractionated and purified isolates. Using a combination of in vitro assays and various animal models, extracts of DV and derivatives show promise as lead compounds for the development of anticancer drugs, including breast, gastric, liver and haematological malignancies. In addition, DV extracts harbour anti‑inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities This suggests their value as a source of phytochemicals with therapeutic potential.
Cancer remains a leading cause of premature death worldwide, with 9.7 million cancer-related deaths and an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases in 2022(1). Africa and Asia experience disproportionate mortality rates compared to incidence rates relative to other regions of the world which can be attributed to multiple factors including delayed diagnosis, unequitable access to quality health care and higher prevalence of infections with cancer-associated pathogens. The majority of patients with cancer choose conventional therapies which include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and for some cancers, immunotherapy, hormone therapy, and other precision-based therapies (2). Most patients with cancer receive a combination of these treatment modalities, for instance, surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The effectiveness of the therapy is dependent on a number of interrelated factors, with the type and stage of cancer, and the overall health of the patient being major determinants.
Complementary and Alternative medicines (CAMs) include healthcare practices which are not part of standard and approved medical care, and an estimated 25-84% of patients with cancer use CAM for reasons ranging from personal and cultural beliefs, distrust of modern medicine, or in an attempt to manage the adverse side-effects of conventional treatments (3). The proportion of patients with cancer who primarily use CAMs is higher in developing countries, and this is thought to result from cultural beliefs and practices within specific communities. WHO estimates show that >80% of the population in certain developing countries primarily use CAMs for their health care needs (4). CAM therapies, unlike conventional Western medicine, are not regulated or controlled by any governmental health agency such as the Food and Drug Administration, and although often categorized as ‘natural’, their use may prove harmful to users due to toxicity and/or incompatibility with conventional treatments if taken concurrently (5).
Nevertheless, natural products have played a crucial role in the development of modern-day cancer therapies and remain an essential source for the discovery and development of new drugs. Due to their scaffold diversity and structural complexity, natural products are structurally optimized by evolution to achieve highly adapted and specific biological functions and as such provide an important foundation to serve as lead molecules in the development of novel and more effective pharmaceuticals (6). With the continued battle of drug resistance and worsening of side effects, there have been renewed efforts in the inclusion of naturally occurring compounds within drug discovery platforms (7). These include derivatives from medicinal plants, which, for centuries, have been utilized by communities to treat an array of illnesses (8).
The oldest evidence of the use of plants for therapeutic purposes was found on a Sumerian clay slab from Nagpur, which dates back 5000 years (9). Historical records on the use of plants as powders, teas, tinctures and poultices can be found in Chinese, Indian, Arab and Egyptian cultures (8,10). Some currently in-use chemotherapeutic drugs of herbal origin include: i) Paclitaxel, a terpenoid isolated from the bark and needles of the Pacific yew tree, used in the treatment of several cancers including breast, ovarian, and lung cancer (11,12); ii) etoposide, a non-alkaloid lignan derivative isolated from the rhizomes and roots of the Mayapple, Podophyllum peltatum/emodi used in the treatment testicular cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and several other cancers (13,14); and iii) vincristine, a vinca alkaloid isolated from the leaves of the Madagascar periwinkle, Catharanthus roseus, used to treat non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer and leukemia (15,16). Plant-derived bioactive compounds continue to be a valuable source of anticancer drugs and documenting of current knowledge around the use and properties of medicinal plants is therefore useful in the developmental pipeline of these naturally derived drugs.
The evergreen shrub Dodonaea viscosa (DV) is widely reported for its medicinal use in complementary medicine, prescribed by ‘traditional healers’ or alternative medicine practitioners in several countries within the tropical and sub-tropical regions, including Australia, India, Southern African countries, Mexico, Pacific Islands, the Caribbean, Southeast Asia, and parts of the Middle East (Fig. 1A) (17). The bark and leaves are the most commonly used parts of the plant and used as tea infusions for a range of ailments including colds, influenza, digestive disorders, thrush, and measles (18,19). Leaf preparations are indicated for external use to treat skin rashes, topical infections and wounds. To date, the therapeutic properties of the plant and its derivatives, as well as the mechanisms of action, remain largely undefined scientifically, but reports have associated antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-diarrheal, and anti-proliferative properties to both aqueous and organic extracts of the plant, with biochemical analyses revealing a broad but typical array of phytochemicals including phenols, saponins, tannins and flavonoids (20-28). Among the most abundant phytochemicals found in DV leaves, six are shown in Fig. 1B, purified using various extraction methods, and numerous additional chemical isolates have been reported (20,21). Of those, only few have been investigated for their pharmacological activities to support potential health benefits. Some of the more comprehensive studies are described further in the sections which follow.
The antiproliferative effects of DV extracts, most often demonstrated using in vitro cell viability assays, have been reported on a range of cancer cell types, primarily of epithelial origin, namely colon, cervical, ovarian, and breast cancers (23-28) (Table I). Studies using the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB231 found that DV leaf extracts, prepared using dried leaves ground to a powder and thereafter suspended in solvent, potently inhibited proliferation, via S phase arrest, with an IC50 of 75 µg/ml (23,24). In a study assessing crude ethanolic extracts of DV leaves, as well as purified fractions (hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, butanol and aqueous fractions), the growth of the established human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HT29 was found to be inhibited (25). The mouse 3T3 embryonic non-malignant cell line was also included for comparison. The crude ethanol extract and the chloroform fraction in particular showed significant selectivity towards the cancer cell line, with the chloroform fraction displaying an impressive 12-fold reduced IC50 value relative to the 3T3 cells. However, the two major limitations of the study were inclusion of only one representative cancer cell line, and the lack of directly comparable non-malignant cell lines as controls (25). In a subsequent study, the same researchers fractionated and analysed hydroethanolic extracts of DV leaves and identified over 50 individual chemical constituents, a majority of which were flavonoids and diterpenoids (26). They found the hydroethanolic DV extract to be slightly more selective towards the two human colorectal cancer cell lines SW480 and SW620, compared with Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-1) and the human benign keratinocyte cell line HaCaT. The effects on cell proliferation and cell death were demonstrated using several standard assays, including analysis of cell morphology using microscopy, induction of apoptosis using Annexin V-PI labelling, and assessment of mitochondrial membrane potential disruptions (26). Extractions using a range of solvents, as well as combinations of solvents, found the flowers and leaves of the plant to yield the highest percentage extract, relative to the stems and roots (27). Notably, the yield varied depending on the solvent type, indicating a richness of phytoconstituents with diverse chemical composition. Except for the flower-derived extract, fractions showed potent cytotoxicity against human leukemic (THP-1) and liver (Hep-G2) cell lines, although selectivity towards cancer cells remains undetermined due to the absence of non-malignant control cells (27). In yet another study, the antiproliferative activity of two purified root extracts, both triterpenoid saponins, was demonstrated against the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780(28), while fractions from ethanolic crude extracts prepared from leaves showed growth inhibition in the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549(29). These studies are summarized in Fig. 2, and provide strong evidence for the DV plant as a potential lead source of anticancer bioactive phytochemicals, although limitations remain including the robustness of some of the data especially related to selectivity towards malignant cells. To date, few studies have reported on the cellular pathways mediating the cytotoxic mechanism of action of DV extracts. A recent study revealed potent and selective killing of Burkitt lymphoma cells, mediated, in part, through inhibition of the oncogenic P13K/Akt pathway (30).
The use of nanotechnology in the delivery of DV-derived compounds has shown promising results. Advances in nanotechnology research have allowed for improved drug delivery, demonstrating increased efficacy and specificity of treatment, and reduced adverse effects (31,32). As a result, several nano-based treatment modalities have been translated into clinical trials, including silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), which are widely used in clinical applications due to their antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, and antidiabetic properties, and as conjugates with chemotherapeutic drugs (33). Notably, AgNps synthesized from DV leaf extracts have exhibited potent anti-proliferative properties in vitro against ovarian (SKOV-3) and lung (A549) cancer cell lines (34,35). In both of these studies, DVE-AgNPs were significantly more toxic to the cancer cells compared with non-cancerous control cells or cancer cells treated with the crude extract alone. Furthermore, cancer cells were markedly more sensitive to AgNPs synthesized from solvents such as petroleum ether, acetone, methanol, and acetonitrile compared with those synthesized from an aqueous solvent (34,35). The use of zinc oxide nanoparticle (ZnO NP) preparations from ethanol-, petroleum ether-, chloroform-, and methanol-derived DV leaf extracts have also yielded promising results, demonstrating significant inhibition of cell viability towards liver (HepG2) and colorectal (HCT-116) cancer cell lines compared with fibroblast cells (3T3), showing superior cytotoxicity relative to Tamoxifen-treated cancer cells (36). ZnO NPs exhibited superior cytotoxicity relative to chloroform-derived DV fractions (IC50 values of ZnO NPs: HepG2, 16.4±4 µg/ml and HCT116, 29.07±2.7 µg/ml vs. IC50 values of chloroform DV fractions: HepG2, 26.4±3.3 µg/ml and HCT116, 39.8±13 µg/ml) (36).
To date, only a few studies have made use of preclinical models to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DV extracts. Nevertheless, these have yielded promising outlooks on anticancer efficacy, bioavailability and toxicity. For instance, AgNPs synthesized from ethanolic DV leaf extracts inhibited the development of tumours induced by N-nitrosodiethylamine in the liver of Wistar rats (37). Serum levels of enzymatic markers indicative of liver damage, alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase, were significantly reduced, while albumin levels, a marker of less aggressive tumour progression, were reduced. While DNA damage was reduced in hepatic tissues of rats which received the DV-AgNPs, the apoptosis rate was increased. Overall, DV AgNPs exhibited protective effects against liver damage and significantly inhibited hepatocellular carcinoma progression in rats receiving DV extracts compared with controls (37).
Oxidative damage to proteins and DNA resulting from disrupted reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis is a major contributor to genomic alterations that enhance oncogenic phenotypes in cancer cells. Numerous natural products are rich sources of antioxidants able to act as effective scavengers of free radicals and ROS (38). The administration of extracts from DV, both organic and aqueous, proved protective towards carbon tetrachloride (CCL4)-induced hepatotoxicity in rats (39). CCL4 is known to cause liver damage through the formation of ROS, and in that particular study, hautriwaic acid was suggested as the main DV-derived protective compound identified via HPLC fingerprinting (39). In a more recent study (40), through the use of the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging in vitro assay, stem and leaf extracts of DV were found to have strong antioxidant activities, which corroborated an earlier study where stem extracts of the plant showed strong scavenging activities (27).
The innate inflammatory response is the first line of defense against damaging agents and invading pathogens, but its effects are mitigated by the use anti-inflammatory medicines to mitigate tissue damage caused by prolonged or excessive responses. Naturally occurring agents with anti-inflammatory properties offer potentially safer and more effective alternatives to synthetic options for managing inflammation. The carrageenan rat paw edema model was used to demonstrate that hydroalcoholic (DVHA) and n-hexane (DVH) extracts from DV leaves were more effective compared with the anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin, in reducing inflammation (41). The study demonstrated that the DVHA and DVH extracts effectively suppressed carrageenan-induced inflammation in rats compared with control rats which either did not receive DV or received indomethacin. In another study, this time using mice ear edema as a model to measure inflammation, a 64% reduction in ear edema was observed in mice receiving DV dichloromethane extracts, compared with a 40% reduction in mice receiving indomethacin (42). A potential mechanism mediating these anti-inflammatory effects was suggested to be through the action of the phytochemical viscosine. Using molecular docking simulations, viscosine was found to impair the activity of lipoxygenase, an enzyme responsible for generating pro-inflammatory mediators and implicated in inflammatory diseases (43). Another notable observation was the potent reduction of nitric oxide production, prostaglandin E2 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the culture medium of lipopolysaccharide-induced murine macrophages (RAW264.7), once again suggesting that extracts from DV possess significant anti-inflammatory activity (43).
Extracts from the DV plants have been reported to inhibit the growth and biofilm formation of several bacterial and fungal pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, Salmonella typhi, Shigella flexneri, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholera, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Pseudomonas fluorescens (18,27,29,35,44-46). In rats infected with S. aureus, those receiving oral administration of ethanolic DV extracts for 30 days had improved kidney histopathology with normal glomeruli and convoluted tubules compared with untreated mice who developed thickening of the wall of renal vessels, infiltrating lymphocytes in the kidneys, and damaged glomeruli (44). Notably, extracts from the DV plant have been shown to display inhibitory effects against strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), the organism responsible for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis which remains a public health concern worldwide. Using the resazurin microtiter assay the anti-mycobacterial efficacy of methyl alcohol and chloroform extracts of DV was assessed against three distinct strains of M. tuberculosis namely bg 1972, bg 206, and H37Rv (47). A dose-dependent decrease in the growth of the bacteria was observed, with the most pronounced effect exerted against the H37Rv strain.
The antifungal activity of the acetone-derived DV extract was evaluated against 40 Candida albicans (C. albicans) strains, 20 of which were isolated from individuals living with HIV and 20 from individuals without HIV (48). Although no discernible difference in effect was observed between the C. albicans isolates from the two groups, all strains were potently inhibited by the extracts. Notably, another study demonstrated that planktonic cells of C. albicans exposed to acetone DV extracts and DV bioactive compound (5, 6, 8-trihydroxy-7, 4' dimethoxy flavone) could not form germ tubes (49). These findings lend credence to the use of DV extracts by traditional medical practitioners to treat oral thrush and related infections, and suggest that DV may serve as a natural source of antifungal agents. Collectively, these results indicated that DV is a promising source of phytochemicals possessing antibacterial and antimycobacterial properties.
Viral diseases such as Zika, Ebola, AIDS, SARS, MERS, influenza, and pneumonia are major contributors to mortality and disability around the world. In low-income countries, chronic viral infections are attributable to up to 26% of cancer cases, where cancer incidence and related deaths are expected to increase significantly by 2050, highlighting the urgent need for effective prevention and treatment of viral infections (50). In a study by Rashed et al (51), the human CD4+ lymphoid cell line C8166 was used to demonstrate DV-induced inhibition of HIV-1 infection. Chromatographic separation of the extract with the highest anti-HIV-1 activity (petroleum ether-derived) identified two compounds, β-sitosterol and stigmasterol, as active antiviral agents (51). In yet another study, the effects of five different extracts from DV leaves were examined against coxsackievirus B3 and rotavirus SA-11 viral infections (52).
The hypoglycaemic activity of DV leaf extracts (derived from chloroform, methanol, butanol, and aqueous) was analysed in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits in several independent studies, all of which reported hypoglycaemic effects within 1-2 h after oral administration (53-56). A significant reduction in the blood glucose levels was observed in diabetic rabbits receiving DV compared with those treated with glibenclamide or untreated normal rabbits (53). Prolonged treatment, for 10/15/30 days, potently and consistently reduced blood glucose levels in alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits compared with normal and untreated controls, and a significant increase in plasma insulin levels and a reduction in urea, total cholesterol and triglycerides were observed during the treatment period (54,55). In a different animal model, that of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, a significant reduction in blood glucose, pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, creatine, and urea was observed in DV-treated animals compared with untreated ones, accompanied by reduced levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and pro-inflammatory biomarkers in serum, while no significant change was observed in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol serum levels (56). Histopathological analysis of the liver and renal tissues from the DV-treated animals showed significant liver protection as evidenced by the regeneration of hepatocytes with a lack of fatty lobulation and necrosis, and lack of renal tubular necrosis which was evident in animals that did not receive the plant extracts (56). The cumulative findings from these studies provide strong support for the consideration of DV extract as a viable antidiabetic treatment.
The application of DV-derived products to assist in wound healing has been reported in alternative therapy, prompting investigation of this potential therapeutic benefit in laboratory-based in vivo studies using rats. Ethyl acetate flavonoid-rich fractions extracted from DV leaves were shown to significantly increase levels of hydroxyproline and hexosamine, important constituents of the extracellular matrix, improve collagen formation, and fasten epithelialization and vascularization of wounds, relative to control groups (57). In a separate but similar study using the same in vivo model and approach, DV extracts were found to perform similarly to the known and approved antibiotic nitrofurazone in preventing infection and accelerating wound healing (58). These findings warrant further investigations aimed at isolating the bioactive constituents with wound healing and antibiotic properties from the crude extracts of DV.
Extracts from DV leaves were shown to have gastroprotective effects and protect against the development of ulcers in a rodent model (59). Pretreatment with DV hexane extracts blocked the formation of ethanol/indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer lesions in the Charles Wister rats which displayed reduced gastric glutathione levels, inhibition in the accumulation of alkaline phosphatase and increased gastric pH. These effects were similar to those observed in rats treated with the proton-pump inhibitor drug, omeprazole. In a separate study, the anti-diarrheal activity of DV root extracts (alcohol and aqueous) was analysed in male albino mice fed castor oil to induce diarrhea (60). Both alcohol and aqueous DV extracts significantly reduced diarrhea episodes and stool weight in the mice in a dose-dependent manner, similar to what was observed in the groups receiving the anti-diarrheal drug, loperamide. Additionally, the DV extracts were found to be non-toxic to the mice at a dose of up to 2,000 mg/kg. No clinical signs of weakness or other adverse events were observed in the animals after DV treatment (60).
The present review provides a comprehensive and thorough overview of the updated published literature reporting on scientific investigations into the therapeutic potential of extracts derived from the DV plant, the latter being traditionally used in ethnomedicine around the world. Collectively, studies assessing anticancer potential (primarily anti-proliferative and antioxidant) provide a strong foundation warranting more comprehensive investigations, with emphasis on obtaining the anticancer bioactive components of DV extracts, as well as the application of systems pharmacology and cheminformatics. Compared with more established medicinal plants such as Artemisia annua (source of artemisinin, an antimalarial agent), Catharanthus roseus (source of vinblastine and vincristine, used in cancer therapy) and Taxus brevifolia (source of paclitaxel, an anticancer drug), only a moderate number of laboratory-based scientific studies have been performed on DV-derived extracts and phytochemicals, and even fewer in vivo investigations using animal models. Although numerous DV-derived chemicals have been identified, detailed mechanistic studies aimed at elucidating bioactivities remain sparse, with no reported clinical trials. Nevertheless, the current existing evidence shows considerable promise.
The great diversity in the phytochemical composition of the DV plant extracts as well as the yield thereof appear to be influenced by the choice of extraction solvent. In addition, this diversity is shaped by the specific plant part utilized (leaf/stem/root/flowers). A general trend of decreasing extract yield is observed with a shift in the polarity of the solvent from polar to non-polar, likely due to both the bioavailability and composition of the phytochemicals.
To date, the majority of investigations have employed in vitro assays, making use of established cancer cell lines (Table I). Most studies apply crude extracts or fractionated compounds directly onto cells, however where more sophisticated delivery methods have been employed, particularly AgNPs, greater biological impact is observed. This is expected, given the well described advantages of AgNP technology, including improved stability, increased surface-area-to-volume ratio and enhanced uptake. Significantly more preclinical studies are needed, using relevant animal models, to demonstrate the desired anticancer biological effects, but crucially, to gather data on the safety of the novel compounds. Notably, investigations have primarily involved epithelial-derived cancer cells and reveal a gap regarding the potential of DV extracts for the treatment of sarcomas, melanomas, and haematological malignancies.
Since plant extracts represent a mixture of secondary metabolites, it is unsurprising that studies show DV extracts to have antimicrobial, antiviral, and antidiabetic effects, among others (Table II). Such is the case for other plants that have been widely investigated, such as curcumin, cannabis, and galanga. Therefore, the separation of active ingredients and analysis of bioactivity of each compound to identify those with therapeutic promise is essential, however this can be an arduous, costly and lengthy process. While the rich biodiversity enhances the value of such investigations, there can be significant batch-to-batch variability which represents a regulatory hurdle. To minimise this, cultivation and harvest protocols need to be strictly standardized, while maintaining stable processing conditions (61). These factors can translate into quite extended safety evaluations during the drug development process, and once approved, may require ongoing safety monitoring. Another important and often neglected aspect of ethnobotanical studies is the preservation of traditional knowledge and sustainable use of natural products. Nevertheless, plant-derived compounds remain an important source for the development of novel and effective therapeutics, and it is essential to adopt a multidisciplinary framework that brings together conservation programmes, environmentally responsible harvesting strategies, comprehensive scientific and clinical investigations, stringent quality-management standards, regulatory coherence, and ethical governance.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
Not applicable.
AS and BY proposed the review topic and wrote the original draft of this review article. AS and SM contributed to the manuscript revision and editing. SM substantially edited the final version. All authors have reviewed and revised the manuscript, and provided feedback. In addition, all authors read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 74:229–263. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cavalcanti IDL and Soares JCS: Conventional Cancer Treatment. In: Advances in Cancer Treatment. Springer, Cham, pp29-56, 2021. | |
|
Hulya E, Burcu C, Birol O, Sibel OO, Erdem C and Ozkan K: Evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients: A survey study in Turkey. AIMED. 12:99–103. 2025. | |
|
Keene MR, Heslop IM, Sabesan SS and Glass BD: Complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 35:33–47. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Knecht K, Kinder D and Stockert A: Biologically-Based complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in cancer patients: The good, the bad, the misunderstood. Front Nutr. 6(196)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB and Dirsch VM: International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce. Supuran CT: Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 20:200–216. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Basmadjian C, Zhao Q, Bentouhami E, Ajehal A, Nebigil CG, Johnson RA, Serova M, de Gramont A, Faivre S, Raymond E and Désaubry LG: Cancer wars: Natural products strike back. Front Chem. 2(20)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pattanayak S: Plants in healthcare: Past, present and future. Explor Anim Med Res. 11:140–144. 2021. | |
|
Kelly K: History of Medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, 2009. | |
|
Petrovska BB: Historical review of medicinal plants' usage. Pharmacogn Rev. 6:1–5. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang YH, Mao JW and Tan XL: Research progress on the source, production, and anti-cancer mechanisms of paclitaxel. Chin J Nat Med. 18:890–897. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhu L and Chen L: Progress in research on paclitaxel and tumour immunotherapy. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 24(40)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Keller-Juslen C, Kuhn M, Staehelin H and Von Wartburg A: Synthesis and antimitotic activity of glycosidic lignan derivatives related to podophyllotoxin. J Med Chem. 14:936–940. 1971.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Reyhanoglu G and Tadi P: Etoposide. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL, 2025. | |
|
Noble RL: The discovery of the vinca alkaloids-chemotherapeutic agents against cancer. Biochem Cell Biol. 68:1344–1351. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Škubník J, Pavlíčková VS, Ruml T and Rimpelová S: Vincristine in combination therapy of cancer: Emerging trends in clinics. Biology (Basel). 10(849)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Harris S: Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia. Karoo Desert National Botanical Garden. In: PlantZAfrica. Available from: https://pza.sanbi.org/dodonaea-viscosa-var-angustifolia, 2012. | |
|
Ngabaza T, Johnson MM, Moeno S and Patel M: Identification of 5,6,8-Trihydroxy-7-methoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one with antimicrobial activity from Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia. S Afr J Bot. 112:48–53. 2017. | |
|
Al-Snafi AE: A review on Dodonaea viscosa: A potential medicinal plant. IOSR J Pharm. 7:10–21. 2017. | |
|
Hossain MA: Biological and phytochemicals review of Omani medicinal plant Dodonaea viscosa. J King Saud Univ Sci. 31:1089–1094. 2019. | |
|
Saranya K and Divyabharathi U: Gas chromatography and mass spectroscopic analysis of phyto-compounds in Dodonaea viscosa leaf extract. Pramana Res J. 9:26–35. 2019.https://www.pramanaresearch.org/gallery/prj-p1302.pdf. | |
|
Hoffman M, Marx J, Kaigongi MM, Masondo NA, Lukhoba CW, Yenesew A and Makunga NP: Reflecting on the interesting phytopharmacology of the cosmopolitan Dodonaea genus: Past, present and future. Phytochem Rev: Aug 1, 2025 (Epub ahead of print). | |
|
Mossa GD and Al-Shawi AA: Induction of apoptosis through S-phase in human breast cancer MDA-MB231 cells by ethanolic extract of Dodonaea viscosa L. - an Iraqi medicine plant. J Basrah Res. 41:119–128. 2015. | |
|
Ramkumar R, Periyasamy SK, Venkatraman BR and Sekar KG: In-vitro anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory screening of dodonaea viscosa. J Pharm Res Int. 33:186–192. 2021. | |
|
Herrera-Calderon O, Rahman MH, Pena-Rojas G and Andia-Ayme V: (2020) Dodonaea viscosa Jacq: A medicinal plant with cytotoxic effect on colon cancer cell line (HT-29). J Pure Appl Microbiol. 14:1927–1934. 2020. | |
|
Herrera-Calderon O, Herrera-Ramírez A, Cardona-G W, Melgar-Merino EJ, Chávez H, Pari-Olarte JB, Loyola-Gonzales E, Kong-Chirinos JF, Almeida-Galindo JS, Peña-Rojas G and Andía-Ayme V: Dodonaea viscosa Jacq. induces cytotoxicity, antiproliferative activity, and cell death in colorectal cancer cells via regulation of caspase 3 and p53. Front Pharmacol. 14(1197569)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Malik MN, Haq I, Fatima H, Ahmad M, Naz I, Mirza B and Kanwal N: Bioprospecting Dodonaea viscosa Jacq.; a traditional medicinal plant for antioxidant, cytotoxic, antidiabetic and antimicrobial potential. Arab J Chem. 15(103688)2022. | |
|
Cao S, Brodie P, Callmander M, Randrianaivo R, Razafitsalama J, Rakotobe E, Rasamison VE, TenDyke K, Shen Y, Suh EM and Kingston DG: Antiproliferative triterpenoid saponins of Dodonaea viscosa from the Madagascar dry forest. J Nat Prod. 72:1705–1707. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Priya VT, Balasubramanian N, Shanmugaiah V, Sathishkumar P, Kannan ND, Karunakaran C, Alfarhan A and Antonisamy P: Partially purified lead molecules from Dodonaea viscosa and their antimicrobial efficacy against infectious human pathogens. J Infect Public Health. 14:1822–1830. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Saferdien A: Anti-cancer effects of aqueous extracts of Dodonaea viscosa on Burkitt lymphoma. PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town, 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42528. | |
|
Jin C, Wang K, Oppong-Gyebi A and Hu J: Application of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and therapy-A mini-review. Int J Med Sci. 17:2964–2973. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mosleh-Shirazi S, Abbasi M, Moaddeli MR, Vaez A, Shafiee M, Kasaee SR, Amani AM and Hatam S: Nanotechnology advances in the detection and treatment of cancer: An overview. Nanotheranostics. 6:400–423. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gomes HIO, Martins CSM and Prior JAV: Silver nanoparticles as carriers of anticancer drugs for efficient target treatment of cancer cells. Nanomaterials (Basel). 11(964)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Al-Musawi ZFH and Al-Saadi NHM: Antitumor activities of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using Dodonaea viscosa (L.) leaves extract. Basrah J Agri Sci. 34:42–59. 2021. | |
|
Anandan M, Poorani G, Boomi P, Varunkumar K, Anand K, Chuturgoon AA, Saravanan M and Gurumallesh Prabu H: Green synthesis of anisotropic silver nanoparticles from the aqueous leaf extract of Dodonaea viscosa with their antibacterial and anticancer activities. Process Biochem. 80:80–88. 2019. | |
|
Alghamdi MD, Nazreen S, Ali NM and Amna T: ZnO Nanocomposites of Juniperus procera and Dodonaea viscosa extracts as antiproliferative and antimicrobial agents. Nanomaterials (Basel). 12(664)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Alasmari A: Hepatoprotective activity of Dodonaea viscosa leaf extract nanoparticles against N-nitrosodiethylamine induced tumor initiation in rat liver: Modulation of apoptosis and signaling pathways. J Environ Biol. 43:177–187. 2022. | |
|
Sznarkowska A, Kostecka A, Meller K and Bielawski KP: Inhibition of cancer antioxidant defense by natural compounds. Oncotarget. 8:15996–16016. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ali H, Kabir N, Muhammad A, Shah MR, Musharraf SG, Iqbal N and Nadeem S: Hautriwaic acid as one of the hepatoprotective constituents of Dodonaea viscosa. Phytomedicine. 21:131–140. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Auta R, Waziri P, Oweh OT, Wayah S, Tyoapine D, Bobai M, Solomon B and Onyemaobi U: Antibacterial, anticancer and antioxidant properties of the stem and leaf extract of Dodonaea viscosa. Sci World J. 20:331–335. 2025. | |
|
Ramkumar R and Periyasamy SK: Anti-inflammatory activity of Dodonaea viscosa leaves. IJRAR. 6:223–225. 2019. | |
|
Salinas-Sánchez DO, Herrera-Ruiz M, Pérez S, Jimenez-Ferre E and Zamilpa A: Anti-inflammatory activity of hautriwaic acid isolated from Dodonaea viscosa leaves. Molecules. 17:4292–4299. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Khan AZ, Mohammad A, Iqbal Z, Anis I, Shah MR, Nadeem S, Rabnawaz M, Shahidullah A, Khan H and Khan I: Molecular docking of viscosine as a new lipoxygenase inhibitor isolated from Dodonaea viscosa. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 8:36–39. 2013. | |
|
Majeed ZH, Hasan SA and Ismail RM: Evaluate the benefit effects of Dodonaea viscosa in kidney of infected rats with Staphylococcus aureus. J Pharm Negat Results. 13:291–294. 2022. | |
|
Hamed Al Bimani BM and Hossain MA: A new antimicrobial compound from the leaves of Dodonaea viscosa for infectious diseases. Bioact Mater. 5:602–610. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Naidoo R, Patel M, Gulube Z and Fenyvesi I: Inhibitory activity of Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia extract against Streptococcus mutans and its biofilm. J Ethnopharmacol. 144:171–174. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tong ZW, Gul H, Awais M, Saddick S, Khan FS, Gulfraz M, Afzal U, Nazir K, Malik MY, Khan SU and Khan MI: Determination of in vivo biological activities of Dodonaea viscosa flowers against CCL4 toxicity in albino mice with bioactive compound detection. Sci Rep. 11(13336)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Patel M and Coogan MM: Antifungal activity of the plant Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia on Candida albicans from HIV-infected patients. J Ethnopharmacol. 118:173–176. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Patel M, Srivastava V and Ahmad A: Dodonaea viscosa var angustifolia derived 5, 6, 8-trihydroxy-7, 4' dimethoxy flavone inhibits ergosterol synthesis and the production of hyphae and biofilm in Candida albicans. J Ethnopharmacol. 259(112965)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bizuayehu HM, Ahmed KY, Kibret GD, Dadi AF, Belachew SA, Bagade T, Tegegne TK, Venchiarutti RL, Kibret KT, Hailegebireal AH, et al: Global disparities of cancer and its projected Burden in 2050. JAMA Netw Open. 7(e2443198)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rashed K, Meng TL, Lin-Tao Z and Yong-Tang Z: Dodonaea viscosa (L.) extracts as anti human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) agents and phytoconstituents. Peak J of Medicinal Plant Research. 1:19–25. 2013. | |
|
Shaheen M, Borsanyiova M, Mostafa S, Chawla-Sarkar M, Bopegamage S and El-esnawy N: In vitro effect of Dodonaea viscosa extracts on the replication of coxackievirus B3 (Nancy) and rotavirus (SA-11). JMAA. 1:47–54. 2015. | |
|
Akhtar MS, Ahmed M, Gulzar K and Adnan H: Hypoglycemic activity of Dodonaea viscosa leaves in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits. Diabetologia Croatica. 40:71–79. 2011. | |
|
Muthukumran P, Hazeena Begumand V and Kalaiarasan P: Anti-diabetic activity of Dodonaea viscosa (L) leaf extracts. Int J PharmTech Res. 3:136–139. 2011. | |
|
Sandhya Rani M, Venkatesh P, Pippalla RS and Mohan GK: Biochemical and histological study of traditional plant: Dodonaea viscosa Linn extracts in diabetic rats. J Phytopharmacol. 2:13–21. 2013. | |
|
Alanazi AZ, Al-Rejaie SS, Ahmed MM, Alhazzani K, Alhosaini K, As Sobeai HM, Alsanea S, Alam P, Almarfadi OM, Alqahtani AS, et al: Protective role of Dodonaea viscosa extract against streptozotocin-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats. Saudi Pharm J. 31(101669)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Subramanian S, Duraipandian C, Alsayari A, Ramachawolran G, Wong LS, Sekar M, Gan SH, Subramaniyan V, Seethalakshmi S, Jeyabalan S, et al: Wound healing properties of a new formulated flavonoid-rich fraction from Dodonaea viscosa Jacq. leaves extract. Front Pharmacol. 14(1096905)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Nayeem N, Asdaq SMB, Alamri AS, Alsanie WF, Alhomrani M, Mohzari Y, Alrashed AA, Alotaibi N, aalhathal AS, Alharbi MA, et al: Wound healing potential of Dodonaea viscosa extract formulation in experimental animals. J King Saud Univ Sci. 33(101476)2021. | |
|
Arun M and Asha VV: Gastroprotective effect of Dodonaea viscosa on various experimental ulcer models. J Ethnopharmacol. 118:460–465. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rajamanickam V, Rajasekaran A, Anandarajagopal K, Sridharan D, Selvakumar K and Benjamin SR: Anti-diarrheal activity of Dodonaea viscosa root extracts. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 1:182–185. 2010. |