Pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline and taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Kaori Sakuma
    • Masafumi Kurosumi
    • Hanako Oba
    • Yasuhito Kobayashi
    • Hiroyuki Takei
    • Kenichi Inoue
    • Toshio Tabei
    • Tetsunari Oyama
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 20, 2011     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.212
  • Pages: 257-264
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Although triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis, recent reports have indicated that a higher proportion of TNBC patients shows a pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) than is the case for non-TNBC patients. The aim of this study was to identify markers that predict pCR to NAC in TNBC patients, and to clarify prognostic factors that affect the outcome of TNBC patients with residual disease (RD) after NAC. Among 44 TNBC patients who received anthracycline- and taxane-based combination NAC, we analyzed the relationship between pathological response and clinicopathological characteristics, including immunohistochemical parameters (cytokeratin 5/6, epidermal growth factor receptor, Ki-67, p53, breast cancer susceptibility protein 1 and topoisomerase IIα). We also assessed the prognostic impact on patients with RD by analyzing the correlation between disease-free survival (DFS) and clinicopathological parameters. Sixteen patients (36%) achieved a pCR and log-rank test showed that these patients had a significantly more favorable outcome than patients with RD (DFS, P=0.00184; overall survival, P=0.0080). Among the clinicopathological parameters examined, none was correlated with pathological response, with the exception of p53. Patients with immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 more frequently achieved a pCR than those without p53 overexpression (P=0.0484). In the patients with RD, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the presence of lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with shorter DFS (hazard ratio, 13.333; 95% CI 1.587-111.111; P=0.0171). p53 overexpression may be a key predictor of a favorable response to NAC. Since patients with RD, particularly those positive for lymphovascular invasion, had an extremely poor outcome, novel therapeutic approaches for these patients are warranted.

Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a type of breast cancer that lacks expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This subtype accounts for 10–25% of all breast cancers (17) and is frequently observed in patients of African or Hispanic descent, whereas it is relatively uncommon among Asian patients (4,6,8). TNBC is known to be associated with a poor prognosis (35,7).

Recently, gene expression studies using DNA microarrays have identified several distinct breast cancer subtypes: two ER-positive subtypes (luminal A and B) and three ER-negative subtypes (HER2-positive, basal-like and normal breast-like) (9,10). Among these subtypes, the basal-like subtype is clinically relevant since it shows a clinical course that is as aggressive as the HER2-positive subtype (9,10). Most breast cancers of the basal-like subtype have been reported to be immunohistochemically positive for cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but negative for ER and HER2 (11). It appears that the basal-like subtype constitutes 80% of TNBCs and is more aggressive than the non-basal-like subtype of TNBCs (2,3).

Due to the lack of proper therapeutic targets, patients with TNBC usually do not benefit from appropriate therapy, such as hormone or HER2-targeted therapy. An increasing number of patients with TNBC, which are not always at an advanced stage, have been receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and this has resulted in a higher rate of partial resection, rather than mastectomy. Several studies have reported that TNBC responds more frequently to NAC than non-TNBC, and consequently 20–30% of TNBC patients achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) (1,8,12). Breast cancer patients who achieve a pCR to NAC generally have an excellent prognosis, while patients with residual disease (RD), whose invasive carcinoma cells do not disappear completely even after NAC, usually have a poor prognosis (8,13). It seems that TNBC patients with RD after NAC have a considerably worse prognosis than non-TNBC patients with RD. Liedtke et al (1) reported that 68% of TNBC patients with RD after NAC survived for at least 3 years after surgery, in comparison to 88% of patients with non-TNBC. Collectively, TNBC includes NAC-sensitive and -resistant subgroups, which show a significant difference in outcome after NAC. Therefore, it is necessary to identify markers that distinguish these subgroups.

In the present study, we analyzed TNBC patients who received combination NAC with anthracycline and taxane at a single institution. Our main aim was to identify markers that could predict pCR to NAC by analyzing the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and pathological response. We also attempted to clarify prognostic factors that have a major influence on the outcome of TNBC patients with RD after NAC.

Materials and methods

Patients and tumor characteristics

This study included 44 TNBC patients with a median age of 52 years (range 36–70). These patients received anthracycline- and taxane-based combination chemotherapy prior to surgery at Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan, between July 2004 and July 2008. The characteristics of the patients and their tumors are listed in Table I. The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range 1–35). Patients at clinical stages II, III and IV were enrolled. The 1 patient with clinical stage IV disease had only ipsilateral subclavicular lymph node involvement. Clinical tumor size, lymph node status and TNM status were evaluated by clinical examination, mammography, breast ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. The tumor subtype in 39 patients was invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS), and the tumors in the other 5 patients comprised 3 metaplastic carcinomas, 1 apocrine carcinoma and 1 invasive micropapillary carcinoma, respectively, on the basis of the WHO criteria (14). The histological grade of each tumor was assessed according to the criteria described by Elston and Ellis (15), and all of the tumors were judged as grade III.

Table I.

Patient and tumor characteristics.

Table I.

Patient and tumor characteristics.

CharacteristicsNo.
Age range (median), in years36–70 (52)
  ≤405
  >4039
Menopausal status
  Pre-menopausal21
  Menopausal23
Clinical tumor size
  T13
  T224
  T311
  T46
Clinical lymph node status
  N08
  N126
  N25
  N34
  M1 (ipsilateral subclavicular lymph node)1
Clinical TNM stage
  IIA9
  IIB15
  IIIA11
  IIIB4
  IIIC4
  IV1
Histology
  Invasive ductal carcinoma, NOS39
  Metaplastic carcinoma3
  Apocrine carcinoma1
  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma1
Regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  4 cycles of AC (60a, 600a) and 4 cycles of T (70a)35b
  4 cycles of AC (60a, 600a) and 12 cycles of P (80a)1
  4 cycles of AP (50a, 150a) and 4 cycles of T (70a) or 12 cycles of P (80a)5
  4 cycles of EC (75a, 600a) and 4 cycles of T (70a) or 12 cycles of P (80a)2
  4 cycles of CEF (500a, 100a, 500a) and 4 cycles of T (70a)1
Type of surgery
  Breast-conserving therapy41
  Mastectomy3

a Dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mg/mm2).

b Since the tumors of 2 patients markedly progressed in size even during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 1 patient underwent breast-conserving therapy following 1 cycle of docetaxel and the other received 2 cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide additionally following 2 cycles of docetaxel. NOS, not otherwise specified; A, doxorubicin; C, cyclophosphamide; E, epirubicin; F, fluorouracil; T, docetaxel; P, paclitaxel.

Treatment

Thirty-three patients received 4 cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/mm2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/mm2) followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel (70 mg/mm2). The treatment regimens in the other patients are described in Table I. After completion of NAC, 41 patients underwent breast-conserving therapy and the others underwent mastectomy. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed for the 41 patients who received breast-conserving therapy. Among the 10 patients whose tumors were diagnosed as having a positive surgical margin (tumor cells being observed within 5 mm from the surgical margin by histological examination), 2 underwent additional breast-conserving therapy and the others received additional booster radiotherapy.

Definition of triple-negative breast cancer

Expression of ER and PR was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Tumors were interpreted as negative for ER and PR when <10% of all tumor cells showed nuclear staining. HER2 was considered to be negative when the HER2 score was 0 or 1+ by immunohistochemistry, or when the HER2/CEP17 gene copy ratio was <1.8 by FISH analysis in tumors, the HER2 score of which was 2+. TNBCs were defined as ER-negative, PR-negative and HER2-negative breast cancers.

Assessment of pathological response and definition of pathological complete response

The response grade of each tumor was determined by at least three of the authors (K.S., H.O. and M.K.). The degree of pathological response to NAC was evaluated according to the response criteria of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (16). pCR was defined as complete disappearance of invasive carcinoma cells in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes after NAC. Residual intraductal carcinoma was included in the pCR category (13).

Clinicopathological studies for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The relationships between pathological response and clinicopathological characteristics (age, menopausal status, clinical tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage, histological classification, morphological features and immunohistochemical parameters) were analyzed in order to identify factors that are closely correlated with pCR to NAC. For the histological analysis, we focused our attention on the 39 invasive ductal carcinomas, since the other five tumor types are biologically distinct from conventional invasive ductal carcinomas. We examined the 39 pre-treatment core-needle biopsy specimens to detect markers that were significantly correlated with a good response to NAC. The morphological features evaluated were central necrosis, central fibrosis, lymphoid stroma and pushing margin. These features are frequently found in ER-negative breast carcinomas and basal-like-subtype breast carcinomas (overlapped with TNBC) (17,18). The immunohistochemical parameters evaluated were CK5/6, EGFR, Ki-67, p53, breast cancer susceptibility protein 1 (BRCA1) and topoisomerase IIα (TOPO IIα). The methods used for immunohistochemistry were previously described (19). The clone designations, companies that supplied the primary antibodies and dilution factors used were: CK5/6 (D5/16B4; Dako Japan; 1:50), Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako Japan; 1:50), p53 (DO7; Dako Japan; 1:100), BRCA1 (MS110; EMD Bioscience Calbiochem; 1:50) and TOPO IIα (Ki-S1; Dako Japan; 1:100). EGFR was stained using an EGFRpharmDx kit (Dako Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Cases were interpreted as positive for CK5/6 and EGFR when any of the tumor cells had cytoplasmic and membranous staining, respectively. The basal-like subtype was defined as CK5/6-and/or EGFR-positive among the TNBCs (11). The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was defined as the ratio of MIB-1-stained tumor cells to all tumor cells counted, multiplied by 100. To evaluate the Ki-67 LI, stained tumor cells were counted in at least three high-power fields that showed the highest positivity in each section. Since TNBC commonly shows a high Ki-67 LI, we used a Ki-67 LI of 50% as a cut-off point to define each tumor as having a high or low Ki-67 LI; this value was almost equal to the mean index of TNBC observed at our institution. For the expression of p53, BRCA1 and TOPO IIα, nuclear staining cutoff values of 25 (12), 10 (20) and 25% (2) of all tumor cells, respectively, were used to define positivity.

Clinicopathological studies for the prediction of outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

For this analysis, from 28 TNBC patients with RD 1 patient with stage IV disease was excluded. Of the 27 patients with RD, the relationships between disease-free survival (DFS) and various clinicopathological characteristics were assessed to identify the factors related to outcome after NAC. We analyzed the surgical materials resected after NAC to obtain data on pathological parameters (tumor size, lymph node status, TNM status, grade of pathological response and lymphovascular invasion).

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was conducted to analyze the associations between pathological response to NAC and clinicopathological characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the DFS and overall survival (OS) survivorship functions. Survival curves of the pCR and RD groups were compared using the log-rank test. The univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to derive factors that were predictive of unfavorable DFS in patients with RD after NAC.

Results

Pathological response and survival analysis

No residual invasive carcinoma cells in the breast were confirmed histologically in 19 of the 44 patients (43%) after NAC. Three of the 19 patients, however, had residual carcinoma cells in the resected lymph nodes. As a result, 16 of the 44 patients (36%) achieved a pCR. All of the patients with pCR were alive and well during their follow-up periods (mean 17.5; range 1–35 months). On the other hand, 8 of the 28 patients (29%) with RD relapsed during follow-up (mean 11; range 2–33 months) and died of breast cancer within 2 years after surgery. Log-rank test showed that patients with pCR had a significantly more favorable outcome than patients with RD (DFS, P=0.00184; OS, P=0.0080) (Fig. 1).

Factors predictive of a pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Although the associations between pathological response to NAC and the clinicopathological characteristics (age, menopausal status, clinical tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage and histological classification) were evaluated, none of the characteristics was significantly correlated with pathological response, as represented in Table II.

Table II.

Correlations between pathological response and clinicopathological characteristics.

Table II.

Correlations between pathological response and clinicopathological characteristics.

CharacteristicspCR, no. (%)RD, no. (%)P-valuea
Age, in years
  ≤401 (20)4 (80)0.6380
  >4015 (38)24 (62)
Menopausal status
  Pre-menopausal7 (33)14 (67)0.7606
  Menopausal9 (39)14 (61)
Clinical tumor size
  T1, T29 (33)18 (67)0.7495
  T3, T47 (41)10 (59)
Clinical lymph node status
  Negative2 (25)6 (75)0.6895
  Positive14 (39)22 (61)
Clinical TNM stage
  IIA, IIB9 (38)15 (63)>0.9999
  IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IV7 (35)13 (65)
Histology
  Invasive ductal carcinoma, NOS15 (38)24 (62)0.6380b
  Metaplastic carcinoma0 (0)3 (100)
  Apocrine carcinoma1 (100)0 (0)
  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma0 (0)1 (100)

a Fisher’s exact test;

b invasive ductal carcinoma, NOS vs. the others. pCR, pathological complete response; RD, residual disease; NOS, not otherwise specified.

In the 39 invasive ductal carcinomas that were examined histologically, the only factor that was significantly associated with response to NAC was immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 (Table III; P=0.0484). The representative histology and immunohistochemistry for p53 of a tumor that disappeared in response to NAC are shown in Fig. 2. In addition, it was suggested that an absence of central necrosis was correlated with a higher pCR rate (P=0.0832). The pCR rate for basal-like subtype cancers, accounting for 34 of the 39 invasive ductal carcinomas (87%), was similar to that for non-basal-like subtype cancers. Although overexpression of TOPO IIα was observed in 27 of the 39 invasive ductal carcinomas (69%), no significant correlation between overexpression and the rate of pathological response to NAC was observed.

Table III.

Correlations between pathological response and histological features, including immunohistochemical parameters.

Table III.

Correlations between pathological response and histological features, including immunohistochemical parameters.

CharacteristicspCR, no. (%)RD, no. (%)P-valuea
Central necrosis
  Positive2 (17)10 (83)0.0832
  Negative13 (48)14 (52)
Central fibrosis
  Positive3 (30)7 (70)0.7110
  Negative12 (41)17 (59)
Lymphoid stroma
  Positive3 (60)2 (40)0.3541
  Negative12 (35)22 (65)
Pushing margin
  Positive11 (35)20 (65)0.6857
  Negative4 (50)4 (50)
Basal-like phenotype
  Yes13 (38)21 (62)>0.9999
  No2 (40)3 (60)
Ki-67 LI
  High LI11 (39)17 (61)>0.9999
  Low LI4 (36)7 (64)
p53
  Positive11 (55)9 (45)0.0484
  Negative4 (21)15 (79)
BRCA1
  Positive4 (27)11 (73)0.3172
  Negative11 (46)13 (54)
TOPO IIα
  Positive11 (41)16 (59)0.7342
  Negative4 (33)8 (67)

a Fisher’s exact test. pCR, pathological complete response; RD, residual disease; LI, labeling index; BRCA1, breast cancer susceptibility protein 1; TOPO IIα, topoisomerase IIα.

Factors predictive of disease-free survival among the 27 patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Lymphovascular invasion was found to significantly correlate with shorter DFS (hazard ratio, 13.333; 95% CI 1.587–111.111; P=0.0171), as shown in Table IV.

Table IV.

Correlations between disease-free survival after surgery and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with residual disease.

Table IV.

Correlations between disease-free survival after surgery and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with residual disease.

CharacteristicsTotal no.Relapse no. (%)Hazard ratio95% CIP-valuea
Age, in years
  ≤4041 (25)0.8000.095–6.7040.8366
  >40236 (26)1
Menopausal status
  Pre-menopausal143 (21)0.6520.145–2.9350.5770
  Menopausal134 (31)1
Clinical tumor sizeb
  T1, T2185 (28)1.3710.265–7.0870.7066
  T3, T492 (22)1
Pathological tumor sizec
  T0, T1, T2245 (21)0.3160.061–1.6370.1698
  T3, T432 (67)1
Clinical lymph node statusb
  Positive216 (29)1.5410.185–12.8210.6898
  Negative61 (17)1
Pathological lymph node statusc
  Positive186 (33)2.1880.259–18.5190.4722
  Negative91 (11)1
Clinical TNM stageb
  IIA, IIB152 (13)0.3040.059–1.5780.1565
  IIIA, IIIB, IIIC125 (42)1
Pathological TNM stagec
  I, IIA, IIB224 (18)0.3730.083–1.6720.1974
  IIIA, IIIB, IIIC53 (60)1
Histology
  Invasive ductal carcinoma, NOS235 (22)0.4880.094–2.5250.3918
  Others42 (50)1
Grade of pathological response
  3d, 2b, 2a72(29)1.1830.229–6.1350.8405
  1b, 1a205 (25)1
Lymphovascular invasion after NAC
  Positive106 (60)13.3331.587–111.1110.0171
  Negative171 (6)1

a Cox regression analysis;

b assessed prior to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy clinically;

c assessed after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy pathologically;

d carcinoma cells remaining only in the lymph node. NOS, not otherwise specified; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Discussion

In the present study we showed that p53 overexpression in the TNBCs examined was strongly correlated with increased susceptibility of the cancer to NAC. This finding is in line with data obtained from European TNBC patients who received NAC (21). Among previous analyses of breast cancers with various ER and HER2 statuses, some have shown that p53 abnormalities, including gene mutation, LOH or immunohistochemical overexpression, are significantly associated with resistance to anthracycline-based chemotherapy (22,23), whereas others have not supported this conclusion (2426). Although the relationship between p53 abnormality and sensitivity to NAC seems to be unproven among breast cancers as a whole, it is likely that immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 protein is a reliable indicator of a good response to NAC in TNBC. It has also been demonstrated that p53 overexpression or mutation is present more frequently in TNBC than in non-TNBC (2,3,27). From a clinical viewpoint, this suggests that more TNBC patients than non-TNBC patients may achieve a pCR to NAC. However, as our study population was small, the results need to be validated in a larger number of TNBC patients.

Normal p53 protein induces G1 arrest and repairs damage to DNA, or causes apoptosis in cells with DNA damage. In the present study, TNBCs that were positive for p53 overexpression, many of which were considered to have lost their normal p53 function, showed a much better response to NAC than those that were negative, many of which would have normal p53 function. TNBC cells that have lost their p53 function appear to accumulate DNA damage, resulting in cell death during or after NAC. In other words, a lack of normal p53 function in TNBC cells appears to be one of the factors determining susceptibility to NAC.

In the present study, all of the TNBC patients with pCR were alive and well during their follow-up periods. On the other hand, 8 of the 28 patients with RD after NAC, whose tumors showed various degrees of response to NAC, relapsed within 2 years after surgery and died of the disease. TNBC patients with RD after NAC, which constitute 70–80% of TNBC cases, are likely to relapse soon after completion of their therapy. Therefore, the clinical outcome for TNBC as a whole remains poor, irrespective of the high pCR rate (1,8,12). We found that the presence of lymphovascular invasion in the residual tumor tissues after NAC was significantly associated with a poorer outcome in patients with RD. Nogi et al (28) reported that EGFR-positive TNBC patients had a worse outcome after NAC compared to patients with EGFR-negative tumors. In our study, none of the immunohistochemical markers examined, including CK5/6, EGFR, Ki-67, p53, BRCA1 and TOPO IIα, were positively correlated with outcome in patients with RD (data not shown). Since little is known about the prognostic factors of TNBC patients with RD after NAC, the factors strongly influencing outcome in such patients remain to be clarified.

TOPO IIα is known to be a target molecule of anthracyclines. Approximately 40% of HER2-positive breast cancers have been shown to have a TOP2A gene amplification (29), as the gene is located next to the HER2 gene on chromosome 17q12-q21. Although very few HER2-negative breast cancers have a TOP2A gene amplification, previous studies have indicated that 80–90% of TNBCs are immunohistochemically positive for TOPO IIα protein (2,30). The finding that 69% of the TNBCs we examined demonstrated TOPO IIα protein overexpression is compatible with previous data. Although it is reported that TOPO IIα-positive breast cancers, i.e., those showing a gene amplification and/or protein overexpression, are susceptible to anthracycline (29,31,32), we did not observe a prominent correlation between TOPO IIα protein expression and pathological response to NAC. On the other hand, TOPO IIα protein expression is apparently associated with the growth activity of breast cancer cells (33,34). In our study, the expression of TOPO IIα protein was significantly correlated with the Ki-67 LI (data not shown) of the tumor cells. Thus, high positivity for TOPO IIα in TNBC seems to reflect the high proliferative activity of the tumor cells.

In conclusion, immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 in TNBC cells has been shown to be strikingly correlated with a pCR; p53 overexpression may thus be a marker of a more favorable response to anthracycline- and taxane-based NAC. TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC, particularly those with lymphovascular invasion, often relapsed and died of the cancer. There is an urgent need to develop effective therapy for TNBCs that are resistant to anthracycline- and taxane-based NAC.

References

1. 

Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al: Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:1275–1281. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Tan DS, Marchió C, Jones RL, Savage K, Smith IE, Dowsett M and Reis-Filho JS: Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline-treated patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 111:27–44. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3. 

Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, Lee AH, Robertson JF and Ellis IO: Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 109:25–32. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4. 

Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA and Caggiano V: Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California Cancer Registry. Cancer. 109:1721–1728. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

5. 

Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, Kearney T, Higgins SA, Weidhaas J, Harris L, Hait W and Toppmeyer D: Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 24:5652–5657. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6. 

Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al: Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 295:2492–2502. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7. 

Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P and Narod SA: Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 13:4429–4434. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8. 

Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, Ollila DW, Sartor CI, Graham ML and Perou CM: The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 13:2329–2334. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9. 

Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al: Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:10869–10874. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

10. 

Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al: Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:8418–8423. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11. 

Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, et al: Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 10:5367–5374. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12. 

Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ, et al: Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy: paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 7:2032007. View Article : Google Scholar

13. 

Mazouni C, Peintinger F, Wan-Kau S, Andre F, Gonzalez Angulo AM, Symmans WF, Meric-Bernstam F, Valero V, Hortobagyi GN and Pusztai L: Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 25:2650–2655. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

14. 

Tavassoli FA and Devilee P; World Health Organization: Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. IARC Press; Lyon: 2003

15. 

Elston CW and Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 19:403–410. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar

16. 

Kurosumi M: Significance and problems in evaluations of pathological responses to neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 13:254–259. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17. 

Putti TC, El-Rehim DM, Rakha EA, Paish CE, Lee AH, Pinder SE and Ellis IO: Estrogen receptor-negative breast carcinomas: a review of morphology and immunophenotypical analysis. Mod Pathol. 18:26–35. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18. 

Livasy CA, Karaca G, Nanda R, Tretiakova MS, Olopade OI, Moore DT and Perou CM: Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 19:264–271. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19. 

Kono S, Kurosumi M, Simooka H, Kawanowa K, Ninomiya J, Takei H, Suemasu K and Kuroda Y: Immunohistochemical study of the relationship between Ki-67 labeling index of proliferating cells of gynecomastia, histological phase and duration of disease. Pathol Int. 56:655–658. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

20. 

Yang Q, Sakurai T, Mori I, Yoshimura G, Nakamura M, Nakamura Y, Suzuma T, Tamaki T, Umemura T and Kakudo K: Prognostic significance of BRCA1 expression in Japanese sporadic breast carcinomas. Cancer. 92:54–60. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21. 

Bidard FC, Matthieu MC, Chollet P, Raoefils I, Abrial C, Dômont J, Spielmann M, Delaloge S, André F and Penault Llorca F: p53 status and efficacy of primary anthracyclines/alkylating agent-based regimen according to breast cancer molecular classes. Ann Oncol. 19:1261–1265. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22. 

Geisler S, Lønning PE, Aas T, Johnsen H, Fluge O, Haugen DF, Lillehaug JR, Akslen LA and Børresen-Dale AL: Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 61:2505–2512. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

23. 

Aas T, Børresen AL, Geisler S, Smith-Sørensen B, Johnsen H, Varhaug JE, Akslen LA and Lønning PE: Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. Nat Med. 2:811–814. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24. 

Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Vijuer MJ and van de Velde CJ; Cooperating Investigators of the EORTC: Tumour response to preoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: the predictive role of p53 expression. Eur J Cancer. 42:1369–1379. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25. 

Colleoni M, Orvieto E, Nolé F, et al: Prediction of response to primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 35:574–579. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26. 

Bertheau P, Turpin E, Rickman DS, Espié M, de Reyniès A, Feugeas JP, Plassa LF, Soliman H, Varna M, de Roquancourt A, Lehmann-Che J, Beuzard Y, Marty M, Misset JL, Janin A and de Thé H: Exquisite sensitivity of TP53 mutant and basal breast cancers to a dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen. PLoS Med. 4:e902007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27. 

Umemura S, Takekoshi S, Suzuki Y, Saitoh Y, Tokuda Y and Osamura RY: Estrogen receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer tissue have the highest Ki-67 labeling index and EGFR expression: gene amplification does not contribute to EGFR expression. Oncol Rep. 14:337–343. 2005.

28. 

Nogi H, Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Tabei I, Kawase K, Toriumi Y, Fukushima H and Uchida K: EGFR as paradoxical predictor of chemosensitivity and outcome among triple-negative breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 21:413–417. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

29. 

Tanner M, Isola J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Malmström P, Wilking N, Nilsson J and Bergh J: Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification predicts favorable treatment response to tailored and dose-escalated anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2/neu-amplified breast cancer: Scandinavian Breast Group Trial 9401. J Clin Oncol. 24:2428–2436. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

30. 

Arriola E, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Lambros MB, Jones RL, James M, Savage K, Smith IE, Dowsett M and Reis-Filho JS: Topoisomerase II alpha amplification may predict benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in HER2 positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 106:181–189. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31. 

MacGrogan G, Rudolph P, Mascarel Id I, et al: DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression and the response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 89:666–671. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32. 

Järvinen TA, Tanner M, Rantanen V, Bärlund M, Borg A, Grénman S and Isola J: Amplification and deletion of topoisomerase IIalpha associate with ErbB-2 amplification and affect sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 156:839–847. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

33. 

Lynch BJ, Guinee DG Jr and Holden JA: Human DNA topoisomerase II-alpha: a new marker of cell proliferation in invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 28:1180–1188. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34. 

Järvinen TA, Kononen J, Pelto-Huikko M and Isola J: Expression of topoisomerase IIalpha is associated with rapid cell proliferation, aneuploidy, and c-erbB2 overexpression in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 148:2073–2082. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-April 2011
Volume 2 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Sakuma K, Kurosumi M, Oba H, Kobayashi Y, Takei H, Inoue K, Tabei T and Oyama T: Pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline and taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Exp Ther Med 2: 257-264, 2011.
APA
Sakuma, K., Kurosumi, M., Oba, H., Kobayashi, Y., Takei, H., Inoue, K. ... Oyama, T. (2011). Pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline and taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.212
MLA
Sakuma, K., Kurosumi, M., Oba, H., Kobayashi, Y., Takei, H., Inoue, K., Tabei, T., Oyama, T."Pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline and taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2.2 (2011): 257-264.
Chicago
Sakuma, K., Kurosumi, M., Oba, H., Kobayashi, Y., Takei, H., Inoue, K., Tabei, T., Oyama, T."Pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline and taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2, no. 2 (2011): 257-264. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.212