Study of DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes in children born after assisted reproductive technologies reveals no imprinting errors: a pilot study

Zheng,Hai-Yan; Shi,Xiao-Yun; Wang,Le-Le; Wu,Ya-Qin; Chen,Shi-Ling; Zhang,Lin

doi:10.3892/etm.2011.261

Study of DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes in children born after assisted reproductive technologies reveals no imprinting errors: a pilot study

Authors:
- Hai-Yan Zheng
- Xiao-Yun Shi
- Le-Le Wang
- Ya-Qin Wu
- Shi-Ling Chen
- Lin Zhang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, P.R. China, Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, P.R. China
Published online on: April 29, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.261
Pages: 751-755

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have been shown to be associated with abnormal genomic imprinting, thus increasing the incidence of imprinting disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) in ART-conceived children. Furthermore, a recent study described abnormal DNA methylation in clinically normal children conceived by ART. However, data from different studies are conflicting or inconclusive. This study examined DNA methylation patterns of multiple imprinted genes in children born after ART to primarily evaluate the impact of ART on genomic imprinting. A total of 101 newborns conceived by ART (40 ICSI and 61 IVF) and 60 naturally conceived newborns were involved in our study. After obtaining the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee, umbilical cord blood was collected from each infant. Genomic DNA was isolated from each blood sample and treated using sodium bisulfite. Subsequently, using methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), we analyzed six differentially methylated regions (DMRs) including KvDMR1, SNRPN, MEST, MEG3, TNDM and XIST. Meanwhile, information regarding twin pregnancies, gestational age, and birth weight of the neonates was documented. None of the cases presented with phenotypic abnormalities. Children conceived by ART were more likely to have low birth weight and to be born before term, compared with children conceived spontaneously. However, 7 months to 3 years of clinical follow-up showed that none of the children had clinical symptoms of any imprinting diseases. Furthermore, the MS-PCR results showed that all 161 children had normal DNA methylation patterns at six DMRs despite the different mode of conception. Our data did not indicate a higher risk of DNA-methylation defects in children born after ART. However, further studies using quantitative methods are needed to confirm these results.

View Figures

View References

1.	Manipalviratn S, DeCherney A and Segars J: Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 91:305–315. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2.	Odom LN and Segars J: Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 17:517–522. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3.	Jaenisch R and Bird A: Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 33(Suppl): 245–254. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4.	Ferguson-Smith AC and Surani MA: Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes. Science. 293:1086–1089. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5.	Fauque P, Jouannet P, Lesaffre C, Ripoche MA, Dandolo L, Vaiman D and Jammes H: Assisted Reproductive Technology affects developmental kinetics, H19 Imprinting Control Region methylation and H19 gene expression in individual mouse embryos. BMC Dev Biol. 7:1162007. View Article : Google Scholar
6.	Sato A, Otsu E, Negishi H, Utsunomiya T and Arima T: Aberrant DNA methylation of imprinted loci in superovulated oocytes. Hum Reprod. 22:26–35. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7.	Shi W and Haaf T: Aberrant methylation patterns at the two-cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure. Mol Reprod Dev. 63:329–334. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8.	Li T, Vu TH, Ulaner GA, et al: IVF results in de novo DNA methylation and histone methylation at an igf2-H19 imprinting epigenetic switch. Mol Hum Reprod. 11:631–640. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9.	Cox GF, Burger J, Lip V, Mau UA, Sperling K, Wu BL and Horsthemke B: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet. 71:162–164. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10.	Allen C and Reardon W: Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting. BJOG. 112:1589–1594. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11.	DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL and Feinberg AP: Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet. 72:156–160. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12.	Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC, et al: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet. 40:62–64. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13.	Halliday J, Oke K, Breheny S, Algar E and Amor DJ: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and IVF: a case-control study. Am J Hum Genet. 75:526–528. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14.	Rossignol S, Steunou V, Chalas C, et al: The epigenetic imprinting defect of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome born after assisted reproductive technology is not restricted to the 11p15 region. J Med Genet. 43:902–907. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
15.	Lidegaard O, Pinborg A and Andersen AN: Imprinting diseases and IVF: Danish National IVF cohort study. Hum Reprod. 20:950–954. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16.	Bowdin S, Allen C, Kirby G, et al: A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders. Hum Reprod. 22:3237–3240. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17.	Tierling S, Souren NY, Gries J, et al: Assisted reproductive technologies do not enhance the variability of DNA methylation imprints in human. J Med Genet. 47:371–376. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18.	Gomes MV, Huber J, Ferriani RA, Amaral NA and Ramos ES: Abnormal methylation at the KvDMR1 imprinting control region in clinically normal children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod. 15:471–477. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
19.	Kubota T, Das S, Christian SL, Baylin SB, Herman JG and Ledbetter DH: Methylation-specific PCR simplifies imprinting analysis. Nat Genet. 16:16–17. 1997.PubMed/NCBI
20.	Zeschnigk M, Lich C, Buiting K, Doerfler W and Horsthemke B: A single-tube PCR test for the diagnosis of Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome based on allelic methylation differences at the SNRPN locus. Eur J Hum Genet. 5:94–98. 1997.PubMed/NCBI
21.	Gomes MV, Gomes CC, Pinto WJ and Ramos ES: Methylation pattern at the KvDMR in a child with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome conceived by ICSI. Am J Med Genet A. 143:625–629. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22.	Kosaki K, Kosaki R, Robinson WP, Craigen WJ, Shaffer LG, Sato S and Matsuo N: Diagnosis of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 with a methylation specific PCR assay. J Med Genet. 37:E192000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23.	White HE, Durston VJ, Harvey JF and Cross NC: Quantitative analysis of SNRPN(correction of SRNPN) gene methylation by pyrosequencing as a diagnostic test for Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome. Clin Chem. 52:1005–1013. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24.	Murphy SK, Wylie AA, Coveler KJ, et al: Epigenetic detection of human chromosome 14 uniparental disomy. Hum Mutat. 22:92–97. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25.	Kawakami T, Okamoto K, Ogawa O and Okada Y: XIST unmethylated DNA fragments in male-derived plasma as a tumour marker for testicular cancer. Lancet. 363:40–42. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26.	Mackay DJ, Temple IK, Shield JP and Robinson DO: Bisulphite sequencing of the transient neonatal diabetes mellitus DMR facilitates a novel diagnostic test but reveals no methylation anomalies in patients of unknown aetiology. Hum Genet. 116:255–261. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
27.	Al HS, Kupker W, Baschat AA, Sturm R, Bauer O, Diedrich C and Diedrich K: Mini-swim-up: a new technique of sperm preparation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 12:428–433. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28.	Borghol N, Lornage J, Blachere T, Sophie GA and Lefevre A: Epigenetic status of the H19 locus in human oocytes following in vitro maturation. Genomics. 87:417–426. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29.	Chen SL, Shi XY, Zheng HY, Wu FR and Luo C: Aberrant DNA methylation of imprinted H19 gene in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 94:2356–2358.e1. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30.	Ombelet W, De Sutter P, van der Elst J and Martens G: Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction–the Belgian project. Hum Reprod Update. 11:3–14. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
31.	Jaques AM, Amor DJ, Baker HW, et al: Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 94:2674–2679. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
32.	Carolan M and Frankowska D: Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: a review of the evidence. Midwifery 2010 (E-pub ahead of print).
33.	Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C and Webb S: The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 346:725–730. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34.	Manning M, Lissens W, Bonduelle M, Camus M, De Rijcke M, Liebaers I and van Steirteghem A: Study of DNA-methylation patterns at chromosome 15q11-q13 in children born after ICSI reveals no imprinting defects. Mol Hum Reprod. 6:1049–1053. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
35.	Benetatos L, Dasoula A, Hatzimichael E, Georgiou I, Syrrou M and Bourantas KL: Promoter hypermethylation of the MEG3 (DLK1/MEG3) imprinted gene in multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 8:171–175. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
36.	Kubota T, Nonoyama S, Tonoki H, et al: A new assay for the analysis of X-chromosome inactivation based on methylation-specific PCR. Hum Genet. 104:49–55. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
37.	Kobayashi H, Hiura H, John RM, et al: DNA methylation errors at imprinted loci after assisted conception originate in the parental sperm. Eur J Hum Genet. 17:1582–1591. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
38.	Daxinger L and Whitelaw E: Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: more questions than answers. Genome Res. 20:1623–1628. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
39.	Doornbos ME, Maas SM, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP and Hennekam RC: Infertility, assisted reproduction technologies and imprinting disturbances: a Dutch study. Hum Reprod. 22:2476–2480. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
40.	Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M and Skinner MK: Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 308:1466–1469. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI