Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis

Li,Zong-Huan; Yu,Ai-Xi; Guo,Xiao-Peng; Qi,Bai-Wen; Zhou,Min; Wang,Wei-Yang

doi:10.3892/etm.2013.1017

Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis

Authors:
- Zong-Huan Li
- Ai-Xi Yu
- Xiao-Peng Guo
- Bai-Wen Qi
- Min Zhou
- Wei-Yang Wang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Micro-Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China
Published online on: March 19, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1017
Pages: 1531-1537

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficiency and the safety of absorbable implants. Five major electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed and Wanfang Data) were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their establishment to November 2012. Studies on absorbable implants and metal implants for ankle fractures were selected. The meta‑analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1. Ten studies with 762 patients were included and analyzed. Compared with metal implants, absorbable implants used for the internal fixation of ankle fractures produce similar radiographic and functional outcomes (P=0.52). Normally, removal of the internal fixation is unnecessary (P<0.0001) and the incidence of palpable implants is lower (P=0.02) for absorbable implants. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to foreign body reactions (P=0.07), infection (P=0.69), osteoarthritis (P=0.39), pain (P=0.06), refracture (P=0.67), skin necrosis (P=0.99), deep vein thrombosis (P=0.21) and nerve injury (P=0.94). Absorbable implants used in ankle fractures rarely require reoperation and result in similar functional outcomes and complications compared with metal implants. These characteristics make them efficient and reasonably safe for the treatment of ankle fractures.

View Figures

View References

1.	Court-Brown CM and Caesar B: Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 37:691–697. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2.	Scott AM: Diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures. Radiol Technol. 81:457–475. 2010.
3.	Ganesh SP, Pietrobon R, Cecilio WA, Pan D, Lightdale N and Nunley JA: The impact of diabetes on patient outcomes after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87:1712–1718. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4.	Hopton BP and Harris NJ: Fractures of the foot and ankle. Surgery (Oxford). 28:502–507. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
5.	Böstman O, Hirvensalo E, Vainionpää S, Mäkelä A, Vihtonen K, Törmälä P and Rokkanen P: Ankle fractures treated using biodegradable internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 195–203. 1989.PubMed/NCBI
6.	Gaweda K, Walawski J, Weglowski R and Krzyzanowski W: Comparison of bioabsorbable interference screws and posts for distal fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop. 33:123–127. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7.	Zhang J, Xiao B and Wu Z: Surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures with bioabsorbable screws. Int Orthop. 35:529–533. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8.	Rokkanen PU, Böstman O, Hirvensalo E, et al: Bioabsorbable fixation in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. Biomaterials. 21:2607–2613. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9.	Olerud C and Molander H: A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 103:190–194. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10.	Jiang N, Wang B, Chen A, Dong F and Yu B: Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence. Int Orthop. 36:765–773. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
11.	Jung HN, Roh YH, Yang BG, Kim SW, Lee JS and Oh MK: Outcomes of operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures: a comparison of metallic and biodegradable implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94:e1662012.PubMed/NCBI
12.	Song ZL: The choice of fixators for surgery of trimalleolar fractures. Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy. 18:2935–2936. 2011.(In Chinese).
13.	Shi WY, Huang JJ and Huang L: Clinical efficiency of absorbable screws for the treatment of internal malleolus fractures. Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine. 6:139–140. 2011.(In Chinese).
14.	Yun C, Zhu JH, He JS and Yang T: Treating ankle joint fracture by simplified surgical techniques. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics. 11:269–270. 2008.(In Chinese).
15.	Springer MA, van Binsbergen EA, Patka P, Bakker FC and Haarman HJ: Resorbable rods and screws for fixation of ankle fractures. A randomized clinical prospective study. Unfallchirurg. 101:377–381. 1998.(In German).
16.	Kankare J, Partio EK, Hirvensalo E, Böstman O and Rokkanen P: Biodegradable self-reinforced polyglycolide screws and rods in the fixation of displaced malleolar fractures in the elderly: A comparison with metallic implants. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 85:263–270. 1996.PubMed/NCBI
17.	Kankare J, Hirvensalo E and Rokkanen P: Malleolar fractures in alcoholics treated with biodegradable internal fixation: 6/16 reoperations in a randomized study. Acta Orthop Scand. 66:524–528. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18.	Bucholz RW, Henry S and Henley MB: Fixation with bioabsorbable screws for the treatment of fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 76:319–324. 1994.PubMed/NCBI
19.	Dijkema AR, van der Elst M, Breederveld RS, Verspui G, Patka P and Haarman HJ: Surgical treatment of fracture-dislocations of the ankle joint with biodegradable implants: a prospective randomized study. J Trauma. 34:82–84. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20.	Böstman O, Vainionpää S, Hirvensalo E, Mäkelä A, Vihtonen K, Törmälä P and Rokkanen P: Biodegradable internal fixation for malleolar fractures: A prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 69:615–619. 1987.PubMed/NCBI
21.	Westerman RW and Porter K: Ankle fractures in adults: an overview. Trauma. 9:267–272. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
22.	Rangdal S, Singh D, Joshi N, Soni A and Sament R: Functional outcome of ankle fracture patients treated with biodegradable implants. Foot Ankle Surg. 18:153–156. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23.	Pina S and Ferreira JMF: Bioresorbable plates and screws for clinical applications: a review. J Healthc Eng. 3:243–260. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
24.	Spitalny AD: Bioabsorbable implants. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 23:673–694. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25.	Stroud CC: Absorbable implants in fracture management. Foot Ankle Clin. 7:495–499. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26.	Böstman OM: Osteoarthritis of the ankle after foreign-body reaction to absorbable pins and screws: a three- to nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80:333–338. 1998.PubMed/NCBI
27.	Givissis PK, Stavridis SI, Papagelopoulos PJ, Antonarakos PD and Christodoulou AG: Delayed foreign-body reaction to absorbable implants in metacarpal fracture treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468:3377–3383. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28.	Pihlajamäki HK, Salminen ST, Tynninen O, Böstman OM and Laitinen O: Tissue restoration after implantation of polyglycolide, polydioxanone, polylevolactide, and metallic pins in cortical bone: an experimental study in rabbits. Calcif Tissue Int. 87:90–98. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
29.	Sinisaari I, Pätiälä H, Böstman O, et al: Metallic or absorbable implants for ankle fractures: a comparative study of infections in 3,111 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 67:16–18. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30.	Lübbeke A, Salvo D, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P, Holzer N and Assal M: Risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: an eighteen year follow-up study. Int Orthop. 36:1403–1410. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
31.	Böstman OM and Pihlajamäki HK: Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 216–227. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
32.	Horisberger M, Valderrabano V and Hintermann B: Posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis after ankle-related fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 23:60–67. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
33.	Nourbakhsh A, Patil S, Vannemreddy P, Ogden A, Mukherjee D and Nanda A: The use of bioabsorbable screws to fix type II odontoid fractures: a biomechanical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 15:361–366. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34.	Buijs GJ, van Bakelen NB, Jansma J, et al: A randomized clinical trial of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery. J Dent Res. 91:299–304. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI