|
1.
|
Gandhi R, Dhotar H, Razak F, Tso P, Davey
JR and Mahomed NN: Predicting the longer term outcomes of total
knee arthroplasty. Knee. 17:15–18. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2.
|
Gioe TJ, Sinner P, Mehle S, Ma W and
Killeen KK: Excellent survival of all-polyethylene tibial
components in a community joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
464:88–92. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3.
|
Ritter MA: The Anatomical Graduated
Component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with
20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91:745–749.
2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4.
|
Robertsson O, Bizjajeva S, Fenstad AM, et
al: Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Acta Orthop.
81:82–89. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5.
|
Spencer SJ, Baird K, Young D and Tait GR:
The Rotaglide mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: A 10- to 13-year
review from an independent centre. Knee. 19:20–23. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6.
|
Bottlang M, Erne OK, Lacatusu E, Sommers
MB and Kessler O: A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce
strain at the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 447:105–111.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7.
|
Dennis DA and Komistek RD: Kinematics of
mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect.
54:207–220. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8.
|
Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S,
Hurschler C and Wirth CJ: Tibiofemoral contact stress after total
knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay
designs. Acta Orthop Scand. 73:638–646. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9.
|
Li ZJ, Zhang K and Kim TK: Mobile- and
fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis:
Comparisons of early clinical outcomes. Journal of Clinical
Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research. 12:9589–9593. 2008.(In
Chinese).
|
|
10.
|
Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et
al: Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr
Course Lect. 50:431–449. 2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11.
|
Jacobs WC, Christen B, Wymenga AB, et al:
Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee
prostheses: a randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc. 20:1450–1455. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12.
|
Holinka J, Bahrami N, Lass R, Frantal S,
Windhager R and Wanivenhaus HA: No difference in ROM and knee
function between mobile and floating platforms in TKA. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Jun 29–2012.(Epub ahead of print).
|
|
13.
|
Lampe F, Sufi-Siavach A, Bohlen KE, Hille
E and Dries SP: One year after navigated total knee replacement, no
clinically relevant difference found between fixed bearing and
mobile bearing knee replacement in a double-blind randomized
controlled trial. Open Orthop J. 5:201–208. 2011.
|
|
14.
|
Ball ST, Sanchez HB, Mahoney OM and
Schmalzried TP: Fixed versus rotating platform total knee
arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. J
Arthroplasty. 26:531–536. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15.
|
Hanusch B, Lou TN, Warriner G, Hui A and
Gregg P: Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and
rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised
controlled trial. Int Orthop. 34:349–354. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16.
|
Harrington MA, Hopkinson WJ, Hsu P and
Manion L: Fixed-vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: does it
make a difference? - a prospective randomized study. J
Arthroplasty. 24:24–27. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17.
|
Matsuda S, Mizu-uchi H, Fukagawa S, et al:
Mobile-bearing prosthesis did not improve mid-term clinical results
of total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
18:1311–1316. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18.
|
Higuchi H, Hatayama K, Shimizu M,
Kobayashi A, Kobayashi T and Takagishi K: Relationship between
joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee
arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different
platforms. Int Orthop. 33:997–1000. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19.
|
Wen Y, Liu D, Huang Y and Li B: A
meta-analysis of the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in
total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 131:1341–1350.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20.
|
Carothers JT, Kim RH, Dennis DA and
Southworth C: Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a
meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 26:537–542. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21.
|
Smith TO, Ejtehadi F, Nichols R, Davies L,
Donell ST and Hing CB: Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed-
versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Knee
Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 18:325–340. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22.
|
Oh KJ, Pandher DS, Lee SH, Sung Joon SD Jr
and Lee ST: Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and
mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J
Arthroplasty. 24:873–884. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23.
|
Higgins JPT and Green S: Cochrane Handbook
for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 510 [updated March
2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011.Available from https://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
|
|
24.
|
Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL, D’Errico TJ and
Shen J: The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile
bearing posterior stabilized TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 470:33–44.
2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25.
|
Lädermann A, Lübbeke A, Stern R, Riand N
and Fritschy D: Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological
study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee. 15:206–210.
2008.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26.
|
Jolles BM, Grzesiak A, Eudier A, et al: A
randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed-
and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year
follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94:648–655. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27.
|
Kalisvaart MM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT,
Stuart MJ and Hanssen AD: Randomized clinical trial of
rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no
clinically detectable differences at five years. J Bone Joint Surg
Am. 94:481–489. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28.
|
Kim YH, Kim DY and Kim JS: Simultaneous
mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same
patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a
similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89:904–910.
2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29.
|
Shemshaki H, Dehghani M, Eshaghi MA and
Esfahani MF: Fixed versus mobile weight-bearing prosthesis in total
knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
20:2519–2527. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30.
|
Wohlrab D, Hube R, Zeh A and Hein W:
Clinical and radiological results of high flex total knee
arthroplasty: a 5 year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.
129:21–24. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31.
|
Kim YH, Kook HK and Kim JS: Comparison of
fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 392:101–115. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32.
|
Buechel FF Sr: Long-term followup after
mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
404:40–50. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33.
|
Sorrells RB, Stiehl JB and Voorhorst PE:
Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in
patients younger than 65 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 390:182–189.
2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34.
|
Buechel FF: Mobile-bearing knee
arthroplasty: rotation is our salvation! J Arthroplasty. 19(Suppl
1): 27–30. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35.
|
Jacobs WC, Clement DJ and Wymenga AB:
Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in
total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and
rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD0048032005.
|
|
36.
|
Parks NL, Engh GA, Topoleski LD and
Emperado J: The Coventry Award. Modular tibial insert micromotion A
concern with contemporary knee implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
356:10–15. 1998.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37.
|
Berry DJ, Currier JH, Mayor MB and Collier
JP: Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces
insert wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 470:1860–1868. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38.
|
Kelly NH, Fu RH, Wright TM and Padgett DE:
Wear damage in mobile-bearing TKA is as severe as that in
fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:123–130. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39.
|
Schunck J and Jerosch J: Knee
arthroplasty. Mobile- and fixed-bearing design. Orthopade.
32:477–483. 2003.(In German).
|
|
40.
|
Chouteau J, Lerat JL, Testa R, Moyen B,
Fessy MH and Banks SA: Mobile-bearing insert translational and
rotational kinematics in a PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 95:254–259. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41.
|
Vogt JC and Saarbach C: LCS mobile-bearing
total knee replacement. A 10-year’s follow-up study. Orthop
Traumatol Surg Res. 95:177–182. 2009.
|
|
42.
|
Parsch D, Krüger M, Moser MT and Geiger F:
Follow-up of 11-16 years after modular fixed-bearing TKA. Int
Orthop. 33:431–435. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43.
|
Roberts VI, Esler CN and Harper WM: A
15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements. J
Bone Joint Surg Br. 89:1452–1456. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
