Effects of heat stress on the expression of the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor in mouse skin keratinocytes

Deng,Xiangdong; Jia,Chiyu; Chen,Fuxing; Liu,Junquan; Zhou,Zonghai

doi:10.3892/etm.2013.1230

Effects of heat stress on the expression of the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor in mouse skin keratinocytes

Authors:
- Xiangdong Deng
- Chiyu Jia
- Fuxing Chen
- Junquan Liu
- Zonghai Zhou
View Affiliations

Affiliations: The Graduate School, Chinese People's Liberation Army Medical College, Beijing 100039, P.R. China, Plastic Beauty and Burn Repair Center, The 309th Hospital of the Chinese PLA, Beijing 100091, P.R. China, The 97th Hospital of the Chinese PLA, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, P.R. China
Published online on: July 23, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1230
Pages: 1029-1033

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of heat stress on the expression of the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) in mouse skin keratinocytes. Twenty BALB/c mice were randomly divided into two groups: the sham heat (control) and scald groups. Skin specimens were obtained 6 h after the treatments. Changes in the expression of CAR in skin keratinocyte samples were detected by immunohistochemistry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. In an in vitro assay, mouse skin keratinocytes were cultured and randomly divided into two groups: the normal control and heat stress groups. Six hours subsequently, the changes in CAR expression in the two groups were estimated by flow cytometry to determine the differences between the two groups. Heat stress significantly increased the expression of CAR in the mouse skin keratinocytes (P<0.05). The upregulation of CAR in mouse keratinocytes in burn wounds may be beneficial for restoring healing in organisms.

View Figures

View References

1.	Birkballe S, Karlsmark T, Noerregaard S and Gottrup F: A new concept of a multidisciplinary lymphoedema centre: established in connection to a department of dermatology and the Copenhagen Wound Healing Center. Br J Dermatol. 167:116–122. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
2.	Hobizal KB and Wukich DK: Diabetic foot infections: current concept review. Diabet Foot Ankle. 3:2012.PubMed/NCBI
3.	Witherden DA, Verdino P, Rieder SE, et al: The junctional adhesion molecule JAML is a costimulatory receptor for epithelial γδ T cell activation. Science. 329:1205–1210. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
4.	Philipson L and Pettersson RF: The coxsackie-adenovirus receptor - a new receptor in the immunoglobulin family involved in cell adhesion. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 273:87–111. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
5.	Gye MC, Oh YS, Lee JE, Shim S, Choi KJ and Ahn HS: Expression of coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoforms in developing mouse bladder uroepithelium. Urology. 77:1009.e9–1009.e18. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
6.	Pazirandeh A, Sultana T, Mirza M, et al: Multiple phenotypes in adult mice following inactivation of the Coxsackievirus and Adenovirus Receptor (Car) gene. Plos One. 6:e202032011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7.	Mirza M, Pang MF, Zaini MA, et al: Essential role of the coxsackie- and adenovirus receptor (CAR) in development of the lymphatic system in mice. Plos One. 7:e375232012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8.	Cifuente JO, Ferrer MF, de Giusti CJ, et al: Molecular determinants of disease in coxsackievirus B1 murine infection. J Med Virol. 83:1571–1581. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9.	Burckhardt CJ, Suomalainen M, Schoenenberger P, Boucke K, Hemmi S and Greber UF: Drifting motions of the adenovirus receptor CAR and immobile integrins initiate virus uncoating and membrane lytic protein exposure. Cell Host Microbe. 10:105–117. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10.	Adamson RE, Frazier AA, Evans H, et al: In vitro primary cell culture as a physiologically relevant method for preclinical testing of human oncolytic adenovirus. Hum Gene Ther. 23:218–230. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11.	Carson SD, Chapman NM, Hafenstein S and Tracy S: Variations of coxsackievirus B3 capsid primary structure, ligands, and stability are selected for in a coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor-limited environment. J Virol. 85:3306–3314. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12.	Martin TA, Mason MD and Jiang WG: Tight junctions in cancer metastasis. Front Biosci. 16:898–936. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13.	Majhen D, Stojanović N, Špeljko T, et al: Increased expression of the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor downregulates αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin expression and reduces cell adhesion and migration. Life Sci. 89:241–249. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
14.	Zhang X, Fang B, Mohan R and Chang JY: Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor as a novel marker of stem cells in treatment-resistant non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 105:250–257. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15.	Wunder T, Schmid K, Wicklein D, et al: Expression of the coxsackie adenovirus receptor in neuroendocrine lung cancers and its implications for oncolytic adenoviral infection. Cancer Gene Ther. 20:25–32. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16.	Shan L, Cui S, Du C, et al: A paclitaxel-conjugated adenovirus vector for targeted drug delivery for tumor therapy. Biomaterials. 33:146–162. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17.	Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e452001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18.	Werner S: A novel enhancer of the wound healing process: the fibroblast growth factor-binding protein. Am J Pathol. 179:2144–2147. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19.	Jameson J, Ugarte K, Chen N, et al: A role for skin γδ T cells in wound repair. Science. 296:747–749. 2002.
20.	Toulon A, Breton L, Taylor KR, et al: A role for human skin-resident T cells in wound healing. J Exp Med. 206:743–750. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21.	Colburn NT, Zaal KJ, Wang F and Tuan RS: A role for γ/δ T cells in a mouse model of fracture healing. Arthritis Rheum. 60:1694–1703. 2009.
22.	Byeseda SE, Burns AR, Dieffenbaugher S, Rumbaut RE, Smith CW and Li Z: ICAM-1 is necessary for epithelial recruitment of γδ T cells and efficient corneal wound healing. Am J Pathol. 175:571–579. 2009.
23.	Havran WL and Jameson JM: Epidermal T cells and wound healing. J Immunol. 184:5423–5428. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24.	Komori HK, Witherden DA, Kelly R, et al: Cutting edge: dendritic epidermal γδ T cell ligands are rapidly and locally expressed by keratinocytes following cutaneous wounding. J Immunol. 188:2972–2676. 2012.
25.	Witherden DA and Havran WL: EPCR: a stress trigger for γδ T cells. Nat Immunol. 13:812–814. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
26.	Macleod AS and Havran WL: Functions of skin-resident γδ T cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 68:2399–2408. 2011.
27.	Chodaczek G, Papanna V, Zal MA and Zal T: Body-barrier surveillance by epidermal γδ TCRs. Nat Immunol. 13:272–282. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
28.	Verdino P, Witherden DA, Havran WL and Wilson IA: The molecular interaction of CAR and JAML recruits the central cell signal transducer PI3K. Science. 329:1210–1214. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29.	Okegawa T, Pong RC, Li Y, Bergelson JM, Sagalowsky AI and Hsieh JT: The mechanism of the growth-inhibitory effect of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) on human bladder cancer: a functional analysis of car protein structure. Cancer Res. 61:6592–6600. 2001.
30.	Bagheri N, Shiina M, Lauffenburger DA and Korn WM: A dynamical systems model for combinatorial cancer therapy enhances oncolytic adenovirus efficacy by MEK-inhibition. PLoS Comput Biol. 7:e10010852011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
31.	Vindrieux D, Le CL, Hsieh JT, et al: Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor is a target and a mediator of estrogen action in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 18:311–321. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
32.	Verdino P, Witherden DA, Ferguson MS, et al: Molecular insights into γδ T cell costimulation by an anti-JAML antibody. Structure. 19:80–89. 2011.
33.	Tomko RP, Xu R and Philipson L: HCAR and MCAR: the human and mouse cellular receptors for subgroup C adenoviruses and group B coxsackieviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:3352–3356. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34.	Nestle FO, Di MP, Qin JZ and Nickoloff BJ: Skin immune sentinels in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 9:679–691. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
35.	Toulon A, Breton L, Taylor KR, et al: A role for human skin-resident T cells in wound healing. J Exp Med. 206:743–750. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI