Associations between apolipoprotein CIII concentrations and microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 7, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1830
- Pages: 951-956
Abstract
Introduction
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). One of the early markers of DN and vascular disease in patients with diabetes is the presence of microalbuminuria (MAU). Without specific intervention, 20–40% of type 2 diabetic patients with MAU progress to overt nephropathy (1). Therefore, screening for MAU and timely therapeutic intervention has become the standard in care worldwide.
Plasma triglyceride (TG) levels are increased in patients with DN. The abnormal synthesis and clearance of TG and the lipoprotein particles associated with TG may be involved in the development of DN (2). There is evidence suggesting that TG-rich lipoprotein (TRL) particles predominantly containing apolipoproteins (apos) E, C and B may be major promoters of DN (2). In patients with DN, plasma TG levels may increase, partly due to the reduced activity of hepatic lipase (HL) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which hydrolyze TG (3).
ApoCIII is a protein composed of 79 amino acid residues that is predominantly synthesized in the liver, although synthesis also occurs in the intestine. ApoCIII is an exchangeable protein moiety between chylomicron remnants, very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs) and high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) (4,5). In the blood circulation, ApoCIII is associated mainly with TRLs, HDLs and, to a lesser extent, low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) (6–8). Total plasma apoCIII levels have been found to be key determining factors of serum TG levels. Studies involving gene variation and circulating protein levels have implicated apoCIII as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (9–12). ApoCIII is an inhibitor of the activity of LPL (13), which metabolizes TG in VLDL and facilitates its clearance from plasma. In addition, ApoCIII reduces the plasma clearance of VLDL and LDL by inhibiting their interaction with hepatic lipoprotein receptors (14,15).
There is considerable information regarding the effects of apoCIII on lipoprotein metabolism (10,16,17). Statins have been suggested to lower plasma apoCIII levels. In 27 patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia, administration of 20–40 mg atorvastatin for four weeks reduced plasma apoCIII levels by 18–30% (18). However, little information is available regarding the association between microalbuminuria (MAU) and circulating apoCIII levels in DN. To enhance the understanding of this issue, the present study aimed to assess serum apoCIII levels and the association between apoCIII levels and MAU, and to evaluate the effectiveness of statins in lowering apoCIII levels and therefore decreasing MAU in type 2 diabetes.
Materials and methods
Patients
Subjects with type 2 diabetes (n=120) aged 48–66 years were recruited from Hebei General Hospital (Shijiazhuang, China). A group of 60 healthy subjects aged 47–65 years (30 male and 30 female) was selected as control subjects. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethic Committee of Hebei General Hospital and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The baseline characteristics of the type 2 diabetes and type 2 DN groups are shown in Table I. The patients with DN were administered atorvastatin (20 mg) daily. Patients were interviewed every four weeks during treatment to assess drug adherence up to a total of 16 weeks.
Samples
A blood sample was collected following an overnight fast of ≥8 h and prior to insulin administration from the 120 patients with type 2 diabetes and the 60 healthy subjects. Fasting blood samples were taken for the measurement of serum glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and the lipid profile. Timed urine samples (24 h) were collected from all patients for the determination of MAU. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was determined on a Beckman CX9 automatic analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) using a glucose oxidase method. HbA1c levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, using the BioRad Variant Hemoglobin Analyzer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
For the lipoprotein studies, blood was placed on ice in polypropylene tubes containing a solution of lipoprotein preservatives comprising 2.8 mmol/l EDTA, 62 μmol/l chloramphenicol, 50 μg/ml gentamycin sulfate, 10 mmol/l ɛ-aminocaproic acid and 100 mmol/l 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (final concentrations). Samples were immediately centrifuged at 1,008 × g for 25 min to sediment blood cells and were subsequently stored at −80°C until analysis. Total cholesterol (TC) and TG levels were determined using the enzymatic colorimetric method on the Beckman CX9 automatic analyzer and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured using a direct enzymatic HDL-C method based on polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes on the Beckman CX9 automatic analyzer. VLDL-cholesterol (VLDL-C) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were estimated using the Friedewald formula (19). ApoCIII concentration in the serum was determined using a competitive ELISA method (Bioworld Technology, Shanghai, China) (18). The standard curve was fitted to a four-parameter sigmoidal curve. The inter- and intra-assay variability for the assay was <7%.
Body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure (BP) were measured for all the subjects. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Hypertension was defined as BP >140/90 mmHg or the administration of anti-hypertensive drug treatment. Fasting blood samples were measured for biochemistry and metabolic profile analysis. Dyslipidemia was defined as TG ≥1.7 mmol/l and/or HDL-C <1.1 mmol/l in males and <1.3 mmol/l in females and/or LDL-C > 2.6 mmol/l or treatment with lipid-lowering drugs. DN was defined as MAU ≥30 mg/24 h in two collections of timed urine samples (24 h) and serum creatinine (Cr) ≤132 μmol/l. Patients with urinary tract infection, hematuria shown by urine microscopy or obstructive uropathy shown by kidney ultrasound suggestive of non-diabetes-related causes were excluded. Type 2 diabetic patients without DN had serum Cr ≤132 μmol/l and MAU <30 mg/24 h in two collections of timed urine samples. Control subjects without diabetes had no known history of diabetes, exhibited normal glucose tolerance at the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (1998 World Health Organization criteria) (20) and had normal blood biochemistry. The blood and urine samples of patients with type 2 DN were collected after 16 weeks of therapy.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as percentages or as the mean ± standard deviation. The mean differences of continuous variables between the type 2 diabetes and type 2 DN groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. The mean differences of categorical variables between these two groups were analyzed using the χ2 test. The mean differences among groups were analyzed using analysis of variance, and the Newman-Keuls post hoc test was used in the event of a significant F-ratio. Pearson correlation was performed between MAU and the other variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between MAU and other clinically relevant variables, where the clinical variables were considered as independent and MAU as dependent. Estimated odds ratios (ORs) are expressed with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). All significant tests were two-sided and were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
Results
Comparisons of basic clinical data
Compared with the type 2 diabetes group, the type 2 DN group showed a longer course of disease (P<0.01). The stroke and retinopathy rates in the patients with type 2 DN were significantly higher than those in patients without DN (P<0.05). However the occurrence rate of coronary heart disease exhibited no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05) (Table I).
Comparisons of BP, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, lipid profile, apoCIII and MAU
Compared with the control group, systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), BMI and levels of HbA1c, FBG, TG, VLDL-C, apoCIII and MAU were markedly elevated in the type 2 diabetes and type 2 DN groups (P<0.01), while HDL-C levels were decreased significantly (P<0.01). All patients with type 2 DN showed significantly elevated TC and LDL-C levels (P<0.05) (Table II). Although the BMI and levels of HbA1c, FBG, TG, TC, LDL-C and VLDL-C were elevated in the type 2 DN group compared with those in the type 2 diabetes group, the differences were not significant (P>0.05). However, the levels of SBP, DBP, apoCIII and MAU in this group were more notably increased (P<0.01) (Table II).
Associations between MAU and age, gender, course of the disease, BP, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, lipid profile and apoCIII in type 2 diabetes and type 2DN patients
MAU was significantly positively correlated with the course of the disease, SBP, DBP, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, TG, TC, LDL-C, VLDL-C and apoCIII, whereas negatively correlated with HDL-C. MAU exhibited no association with age or gender (Table III).
Table IIIAssociations between microalbuminuria and age, gender, course of disease, BP, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, lipid profile and apoCIII in type 2 diabetes and type 2 DN patients. |
Multiple regression analysis for MAU in type 2 diabetes and type 2DN patients
To further clarify the independent associations of age, gender, course of the disease, BP, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, lipid profile and apoCIII with MAU, logistic regression analysis was performed. This revealed that only apoCIII was independently associated with MAU (OR, 1.100; 95% CI, 1.037–1.153; P<0.001). The other variables were not independent predisposing factors for MAU in type 2 diabetes (Table IV).
Table IVMultiple regression analysis for microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes and type 2 DN patients.. |
Atorvastatin improves the lipid profile and MAU levels in patients with type 2 DN
After 16 weeks of atorvastatin administration in patients with type 2 DN, levels of TG, TC, LDL-C, VLDL-C and apoCIII were significantly decreased compared with those prior to treatment, while HDL-C levels were found to have increased markedly (P<0.05). MAU levels were observed to have decreased significantly (P<0.01) (Table V).
Table VMean differences of changes in the lipid profile and MAU after 16 weeks of atorvastatin administration in patients with type 2 DN. |
Discussion
There is currently a global epidemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), which accounts for 40–50% of all new cases of ESRD. Among the clinical signs of nephropathy, the appearance of low but abnormal levels (>30 mg/day) of albumin in the urine, known as MAU, is first to occur. MAU is a leading cause of DM-related morbidity and mortality (21). In type 2 diabetes, lipotoxicity and glucotoxicity increase the risk of diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications (3,22).
In the majority of type 2 diabetic patients, insulin resistance is a key pathophysiological feature. Lipases are insulin-sensitive enzymes that hydrolyze TG in TRL particles. Diabetic dyslipidemia is typically characterized by high TG and low HDL-C levels. The high TG levels in turn can alter the composition of LDL-C and HDL-C, making these lipid particles more atherogenic (23). Nephritis can be exacerbated through increased TG levels and oxidized remnant lipoprotein particles, which induce mesangial cells to proliferate and secrete cytokines (24). Following the initiation of proteinuria, the loss of lipoprotein particles in the urine can enhance their synthesis in the liver. Furthermore, the lipoprotein particles can cause renal damage by binding to glomerular basement membranes and renal tubular cells. This can initiate a vicious cycle of proteinuria and dyslipidemia (22). Patients with renal disease, whether associated with diabetes or not, have increased TG and remnant lipoprotein levels and decreased LPL and HL activity (3). In addition to the effects of lipotoxicity on the kidney, increased von Willebrand factor and decreased heparin-releasable LPL levels lead to vascular endothelial damage. Reduced lipase binding to the damaged endothelium may further increase TG levels in DN (3).
The present study showed that BP, BMI and levels of HbA1c, FBG, TG, VLDL-C, apoCIII and MAU were markedly elevated in the type 2 diabetes and type 2 DN groups compared with those in the control group (P<0.01), while HDL-C levels were decreased significantly (P<0.01). These findings were consistent with those in other studies (3,23). All patients with type 2 DN showed significantly elevated BP, apoCIII, MAU, course of the disease and stroke and retinopathy rates compared with the patients with type 2 diabetes (P<0.01).
ApoCIII is an effective inhibitor of LPL activity and is present in TRLs and HDLs (13). Sections of apoCIII can be exchanged between these lipoproteins (24). Upon an elevation in TRL concentration, ApoCIII is transferred from HDLs to TRLs, which causes a decrease in HDL apoCIII concentration. Following the degradation of TG in TRLs by LPLs, apoCIII transfers back to the HDLs, such that clearance of the TRL particles may proceed uninhibited (25). In a study by Klein et al (26), an independent positive association between apoCIII levels and type 1 diabetes-related microvascular complications was found in the cohort of patients.
The present study revealed that MAU was significantly positively correlated with the course of the disease, SBP, DBP, BMI and HbA1c, FBG, TG, TC, LDL-C VLDL-C and apoCIII levels, whereas negatively correlated with HDL-C levels (P<0.05). MAU exhibited no association with age and gender (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only apoCIII was independently associated with MAU (OR, 1.100; 95% CI, 1.037–1.153; P<0.001). Other factors were not independent predisposing factors for MAU in type 2 diabetes.
Atorvastatin is a potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor that has been shown to effectively reduce total plasma TC and TG levels. Statins have become the preferred agents as lipid-lowering drugs in diabetic patients (27). Statins have been reported to exert cardioprotective and antioxidant effects, regardless of their effect on LDL-C reduction (28). In a study of 305 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, atorvastatin and pravastatin reduced levels of lipoprotein particles containing apoCIII and apoB by 30% (29). The present study indicated that, by the end of 16 weeks, atorvastatin decreased TG, TC, LDL-C, VLDL-C and apoCIII levels significantly (P<0.05), while increasing HDL-C markedly (P<0.05) in patients with type 2 DN. A significant decrease in MAU was also observed (P<0.01). Rutter et al (30) compared the renal effects of treatment with low- versus high-dose atorvastatin in patients with type 2 DM and optimally managed early renal disease. No statistical difference in renal function was identified between the high- and low-dose atorvastatin treatment groups over two years. The beneficial effect of a glomerular filtration rate of <1.6 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, as estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation, was observed. However, such an effect may have been due to blood pressure management and/or a renin-angiotensin system blocker use (30,31). With regard to the present findings, the decrease in MAU in patients with type 2 DN may have been due to comprehensive treatment. In conclusion, in type 2 diabetes, circulating apoCIII levels were independently correlated with MAU. Atorvastatin improved the lipid profile in patients and may contribute to decreasing MAU levels in type 2 DN.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Tianxiao Hu for the technical assistance.
References
Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ, Keane WF, Mogensen CE, Parving HH and Steffes MW; American Diabetes Association. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 27(Suppl 1): S79–S83. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ravid M, Brosh D, Ravid-Safran D, Levy Z and Rachmani R: Main risk factors for nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus are plasma cholesterol levels, mean blood pressure, and hyperglycemia. Arch Intern Med. 158:998–1004. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hirano T: Lipoprotein abnormalities in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl. 71:S22–S24. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boyle KE, Phillips MC and Lund-Katz S: Kinetics and mechanism of exchange of apolipoprotein C-III molecules from very low density lipoprotein particles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1430:302–312. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Breyer ED, Le NA, Li X, Martinson D and Brown WV: Apolipoprotein C-III displacement of apolipoprotein E from VLDL: effect of particle size. J Lipid Res. 40:1875–1882. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jong MC, Hofker MH and Havekes LM: Role of ApoCs in lipoprotein metabolism: functional differences between ApoC1, ApoC2, and ApoC3. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 19:472–484. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Campos H, Perlov D, Khoo C and Sacks FM: Distinct patterns of lipoproteins with apoB defined by presence of apoE or apoC-III in hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. J Lipid Res. 42:1239–1249. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Davidsson P, Hulthe J, Fagerberg B, Olsson BM, Hallberg C, Dahllöf B and Camejo G: A proteomic study of the apolipoproteins in LDL subclasses in patients with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. J Lipid Res. 46:1999–2006. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schonfeld G, George PK, Miller J, Reilly P and Witztum J: Apolipoprotein C-II and C-III levels in hyperlipoproteinemia. Metabolism. 28:1001–1010. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Talmud PJ and Humphries SE: Apolipoprotein C-III gene variation and dyslipidaemia. Curr Opin Lipidol. 8:154–158. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sacks FM, Alaupovic P, Moye LA, Cole TG, Sussex B, Stampfer MJ, Pfeffer MA and Braunwald E: VLDL, apolipoproteins B, CIII, and E, and risk of recurrent coronary events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial. Circulation. 102:1886–1892. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee SJ, Campos H, Moye LA and Sacks FM: LDL containing apolipoprotein CIII is an independent risk factor for coronary events in diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 23:853–858. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ginsberg HN, Le NA, Goldberg IJ, Gibson JC, Rubinstein A, Wang-Iverson P, Norum R and Brown WV: Apolipoprotein B metabolism in subjects with deficiency of apolipoproteins CIII and AI. Evidence that apolipoprotein CIII inhibits catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by lipoprotein lipase in vivo. J Clin Invest. 78:1287–1295. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ebara T, Ramakrishnan R, Steiner G and Shachter NS: Chylomicronemia due to apolipoprotein CIII overexpression in apolipoprotein E-null mice. Apolipoprotein CIII-induced hypertriglyceridemia is not mediated by effects on apolipoprotein E. J Clin Invest. 99:2672–2681. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sehayek E and Eisenberg S: Mechanisms of inhibition by apolipoprotein C of apolipoprotein E-dependent cellular metabolism of human triglyceride-rich lipoproteins through the low density lipoprotein receptor pathway. J Biol Chem. 266:18259–18267. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jong MC, Hofker MH and Havekes LM: Role of ApoCs in lipoprotein metabolism: functional differences between ApoC1, ApoC2, and ApoC3. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 19:472–484. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shachter NS: Apolipoproteins C-I and C-III as important modulators of lipoprotein metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 12:297–304. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le NA, Innis-Whitehouse W, Li X, Bakker-Arkema R, Black D and Brown WV: Lipid and apolipoprotein levels and distribution in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: effect of triglyceride reductions with atorvastatin. Metabolism. 49:167–177. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedewald WT, Levy RI and Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 18:499–502. 1972.PubMed/NCBI | |
Alberti KG and Zimmet PZ: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 15:539–553. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Genuth SM: The case for blood glucose control. Adv Intern Med. 40:573–623. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cooper ME: Pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Lancet. 352:213–219. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brunzell JD and Ayyobi AF: Dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 115(Suppl 8A): S24–S28. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Batal R, Tremblay M, Barrett PH, Jacques H, Fredenrich A, Mamer O, Davignon J and Cohn JS: Plasma kinetics of apoC-III and apoE in normolipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects. J Lipid Res. 41:706–718. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Barr SI, Kottke BA and Mao SJ: Postprandial exchange of apolipoprotein C-III between plasma lipoproteins. Am J Clin Nutr. 34:191–198. 1981.PubMed/NCBI | |
Klein RL, McHenry MB, Lok KH, Hunter SJ, Le NA, Jenkins AJ, Zheng D, Semler A, Page G, Brown WV, Lyons TJ and Garvey WT; DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Apolipoprotein C-III protein concentrations and gene polymorphisms in Type 1 diabetes: associations with microvascular disease complications in the DCCT/EDIC cohort. J Diabetes Complications. 19:18–25. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Davidson M: A review of the current status of the management of mixed dyslipidemia associated with diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 102:19L–27L. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takemoto M and Liao JK: Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 21:1712–1719. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dallongeville J, Fruchart JC, Maigret P, Bertolini S, Bon GB, Campbell MM, Farnier M, Langan J, Mahla G, Pauciullo P and Sirtori C: Double-blind comparison of apolipoprotein and lipoprotein particle lowering effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin monotherapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 3:103–110. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rutter MK, Prais HR, Charlton-Menys V, Gittins M, Roberts C, Davies RR, Moorhouse A, Jinadev P, France M, Wiles PG, Gibson JM, Dean J, Kalra PA, Cruickshank JK and Durrington PN: Protection Against Nephropathy in Diabetes with Atorvastatin (PANDA): a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of high- vs. low-dose atorvastatin. Diabet Med. 28:100–108. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Marsh J, Stevens LA, Kusek JW and Van Lente F; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Expressing the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem. 53:766–772. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |