In vitro damage of Candida albicans biofilms by chitosan

  • Authors:
    • Yu Pu
    • Aibo Liu
    • Yuqiang Zheng
    • Bin Ye
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 11, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1839
  • Pages: 929-934
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

With the increasing usage of indwelling medical devices in clinical practice, the frequency of fungal infections has increased, such as that of Candida albicans (C. albicans). Biofilms, a protected niche for microorganisms, are resistant to a range of current antifungal agents. Chitosan is a polyatomic biopolymer with advantageous biocompatibility, biodegradation, nontoxicity and antibacterial properties. To investigate the inhibitory effect of chitosan on biofilms formed by C. albicans, cell viability, 2,3‑bis(2‑methoxy‑4‑nitro‑5‑sulfophenyl)‑2H‑tetrazolium‑5‑caboxanilide reduction, and morphological assays, including fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), were employed. As assessed by cell viability assay, chitosan showed significant inhibitory effects on the planktonic cells and the biofilm of C. albicans in a dose‑dependent manner. Fluorescence microscopy and SEM assays confirmed that the chitosan‑treated group showed delayed C. albicans biofilm formation with defect morphological features, due to the inhibitory effects of the vast majority of fungal cell growth. In conclusion, C. albicans biofilms were compromised by the treatment with chitosan, providing an alternative therapeutic strategy against the fungal biofilms in the medical devices.

Introduction

Candida albicans (C. albicans), an opportunistic pathogen, is able to attack hosts that are immunocompromised or otherwise debilitated. With the increased use of immunosuppressive and cytotoxic drugs, antibiotic abuse and implanted devices, including urinary catheters and endotracheal tubes, the prevalence of fungal infections has also increased (13). C. albicans was the leading cause of pulmonary fungal infection in 2011 and the drug resistance rate demonstrates a tendency to increase year by year (4). A number of implanted devices, including intravascular or urinary catheters and endotracheal tubes, are associated with fungal infections, and a biofilm may be detected on their surface (57). In recent years, emerging cases of C. albicans drug resistance have been primarily attributed to the formation of biofilms, with resistance increasing in conjunction with the maturation of the biofilm (8). Mature Candida biofilms consist of a complex three-dimensional structure of layers of yeast cells, hyphae and an abundant exopolysaccharide matrix (9,10). As natural resistance barriers of antifungal drugs, biofilms play a significant role in the invasion and dissemination of C. albicans.

Chitosan is a natural linear polyatomic biopolymer comprising N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and β-(1,4)-linked D-glucosamine. A previous study revealed that surfaces coated with chitosan were able to resist biofilm formation by bacteria and fungi in vitro (11). Chitosan is nontoxic to humans and exhibits excellent biocompatibility. The biopolymer is easily catalyzed to oligosaccharides by various biological enzymes, and is considered biodegradable (12); thus, can be absorbed by the body. Previous studies have demonstrated that chitosan not only has immunoregulatory efficacy, but also a naturally broad spectrum of antibacterial activity that enables the inhibition of biofilm formation (11,13,14).

Chitosan is an extensively studied biomacromolecule that is typically derived from chitin, a major component of crustacean shells. Due to their biocompatible and biodegradable properties, chitosan and its derivatives have been proposed for application in novel drug studies. The effect of chitosan on bacterial biofilms has been extensively reported; however, the aim of the present study was to investigate the susceptibility of C. albicans biofilms to chitosan, with an emphasis on determining the effects of chitosan on various biofilm growth phases and architectural organization.

Materials and methods

C. albicans

A C. albicans strain, previously isolated from a patient, was obtained from the Clinical Laboratory of the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). The fungus was inoculated on a chocolate agar plate and grown at 37°C for 48 h. A single colony of the desired strain was inoculated into 8 ml Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and incubated overnight at 37°C in a rotary shaker at 220 rpm.

Chitosan susceptibility in C. albicans planktonic cells

Chitosan (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was solubilized in 0.2% acetic acid at a working concentration of 1% to pH 5.0–5.5. Serial two-fold dilutions of chitosan stock solutions in SDB were prepared in plastic centrifuges over a range of 0.0078–0.5% and stored at 4°C. A standard inoculum of 1v107 cells [optical density (OD)600] from the overnight culture of the fungal strain was prepared prior to each experiment. Briefly, 100 μl C. albicans planktonic cells were mixed with 100 μl chitosan solution of various concentrations and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Data were obtained from three independent experiments. For the positive control, C. albicans planktonic cells were incubated in the presence of 200 μl SDB without chitosan, while in the negative control, 200 μl SDB only was incubated in wells under otherwise identical conditions. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC)50 for the biofilms and planktonic cells were defined as the minimum antifungal concentration that caused ≥50% fungal damage compared with the untreated controls.

Measurement of chitosan susceptibility in biofilms using a 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5- carboxanilide (XTT) reduction assay

C. albicans biofilm experiments were performed in untreated 96-well plates. The wells of the 96-well plates were incubated for various time periods (2, 8, 24 and 48 h) in 100 μl C. albicans suspension (1×107 cells/ml) at 37°C. The medium in each well was removed at the indicated time points and the biofilms were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Following the removal of PBS, 100 μl chitosan solution of various concentrations were added to one well of a 96-well plate and then incubated for additional 48 h at 37°C. A formazan salt-based XTT reduction assay was performed to assess the metabolic activity (15). All the tests were performed in duplicate and the average was calculated. Positive and negative controls were established as previously described. A total of 100 μl XTT-menadione solution, consisting of XTT (Sangon Biotech) salt solution (0.5 g/l in Ringer-Locke liquor) mixed with menadione (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) solution (1 mM in acetone; Sigma-Aldrich), was added to each well. The 96-well plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Colorimetric changes were scanned at 490 nm with a Varioskan Flash Multimode Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

C. albicans biofilm formation with cover slips

Cover slips (0.8×0.8 cm) that were used for biofilm growth were soaked in concentrated sulfuric acid overnight. The following day, the concentrated sulfuric acid was washed with flowing water and the clean cover slips were immersed in 95% alcohol overnight. All the cover slips were washed three times with deionized water. For biofilm growth on the treated cover slips, as aforementioned, the cover slips were placed in 24-well plates and immersed in fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, Beijing, China) at 4°C overnight. Following this pretreatment, the cover slips were washed with PBS (0.01 M) to remove the residual FBS. To ensure uniform biofilm formation, the cover slips were immersed in 1 ml standardized cell suspension (1×107 cells/ml) and incubated for 90 min at 37°C. The cover slips were lifted carefully using tweezers and gently placed in each well of the 24-well plate containing 1.5 ml fresh SDB medium. Samples were incubated for various durations at 37°C.

Susceptibility of the biofilms to chitosan

To evaluate the chitosan susceptibility of C. albicans cells grown in developing biofilms, the pretreated cover slips were immersed in 1 ml standardized cell suspension (1×107 cells/ml) and incubated for 90 min at 37°C. The cover slips were lifted carefully using tweezers and gently placed in each well of the 24-well plate containing 1 ml fresh SDB medium. A 0.0625% chitosan solution was added to 24-well plates with cover slips and incubated for an additional 8, 24 and 48 h at 37°C.

Fluorescence microscopy

Cover slips pretreated with biofilms were transferred to microscope slides and stained for 1 min with 50 μl Calcofluor White M2R [0.05% (vol/vol); Sigma-Aldrich] under minimal ambient light or in a darkroom. The biofilms were observed immediately under an ultraviolet (UV) range of 440 nm excitation and 500–520 nm emission wavelengths. Any superfluous fluorochrome on the cover slips was absorbed by the filter paper. The stained biofilms were examined under a fluorescence microscope.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

C. albicans biofilms were grown on pretreated cover slips in 24-well plates, as described previously. In the chitosan group, C. albicans biofilms were incubated in 0.0625% chitosan. For the positive control, C. albicans biofilms were incubated in the presence of 200 μl SDB without chitosan for 24 h. The cover slips with biofilms were subsequently washed three times with PBS and transferred to an additional 24-well plate containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C. The samples were prepared using a regular method for electron microscopy examination (16) and viewed under an S-3000N scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Two separate sets of culture were prepared.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were tested for normality and transformed when necessary to meet the assumption of normal distribution. P-values were calculated by one-way analysis of variance and Fisher’s least significant difference test was conducted to determine differences among the test groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

MIC values of chitosan on C. albicans planktonic cells

Fig. 1 shows the results of the experiment assessing the effect of chitosan at various concentrations on C. albicans planktonic cell growth. Chitosan, at a concentration of >0.0313%, was shown to severely inhibit the activity of C. albicans planktonic cells grown for 24 h. The OD decreased significantly when compared with the positive control (P<0.05). When comparing the effect of chitosan over 24 and 48 h, the MIC of chitosan exhibited no statistically significant change on cell growth.

C. albicans biofilm formation

An XTT reduction assay was used to quantify the effects of chitosan on biofilms produced by C. albicans. As shown in Fig. 2, the different phases of C. albicans biofilm formation were significantly susceptible to chitosan. At 2 h, the OD values, as determined by an enzyme-labeled instrument, were similar to when the concentration of chitosan was >0.0313%. A statistically significant difference was observed in the OD values between the 0.0313 and 0.0156% chitosan groups (P<0.05). In addition, a marked difference was observed between all the chitosan groups and the positive control (P<0.05). The results did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between biofilm development at 2 and 8 h, and the optimum concentration of chitosan was almost equal. Compared with the biofilms grown for 2 or 8 h, the OD values for the biofilms grown for 24 or 48 h were significantly higher following exposure to chitosan at a concentration of 0.0313%. The results revealed that biofilms in the mature phase (24-8 h) demonstrated less susceptibility to higher concentrations of chitosan compared with those in the early phase (2–8 h). Thus, biofilm formation exhibits a significant resistance to the antifungal activity of chitosan.

A previous study observed that C. albicans biofilm formation on polymethylmethacrylate strips progresses in three distinct developmental phases: Early, intermediate and maturation (10). The effect of chitosan on the temporal development of C. albicans biofilms on cover slips was investigated with fluorescence microscopy using Calcofluor White M2R, a UV-excitable dye that binds chitin and β-glucan and has long been used to highlight the fungal cell wall (17). Fluorescence microscopy was performed to visualize and compare the three distinct developmental phases between the untreated and chitosan-treated C. albicans biofilms (Fig. 3). In the early stage, characteristic microcolonies and short hyphae appeared on the surface of the cover slips of the untreated cells (Fig. 3A). As shown in Fig. 3B, a few yeast cells were dispersed in the 0.0625% chitosan-treated group at the same stage. During the intermediate developmental phase, a dense network of yeast cells surrounded by a large amount of noncellular material was observed in the untreated group, with the metabolically active cells existing in a network (Fig. 3C). The quantity of yeast cells in the chitosan-treated group at the same stage was lower compared with the untreated group, and the cells were unable to congregate and develop into a bioflim (Fig. 3D). In the maturation development phase, the surfaces of the cover slips were coated with a thick layer of yeast cells and noncellular material; however, it was difficult to distinguish between the cell types (Fig. 3E). By contrast, the chitosan-treated group exhibited yeast cells lacking a network structure and a significantly lower metabolic activity compared with the untreated group (Fig. 3F).

Fluorescence microscopy images were used to correlate the XTT reduction assay results with the visual effects of the biofilm formation at the various exposure times. The results indicated that chitosan was not only able to inhibit the metabolic activity of cells in maturing biofilms, but also delay biofilm formation by terminating the fusion process.

Direct visualization of the effect of chitosan on C. albicans biofilms

SEM examination was used to visualize the structural differences between normal and chitosan-treated C. albicans biofilms. Normal C. albicans biofilms exhibited a dense network of hyphae surrounded by vast amounts of exopolymeric matrix (Fig. 4A). By comparison, chitosan-treated C. albicans expressed a biofilm that lacked a normal network structure and released polysaccharide (Fig. 4B). These results demonstrated that chitosan significantly inhibited C. albicans biofilms in vitro.

Discussion

Currently, fungal infections present an increasing threat to the growing number of immunocompromised patients. These contaminations, of which Candidiasis is the most common, represent one of the most prevalent infections in US hospitals (18). A leading causative agent of Candidiasis continues to be C. albicans (18). However, numerous problems remain in the current therapies for fungal infections. Antifungal treatment strategies for C. albicans are limited to a small armamentarium of compounds, which mainly include azoles (such as fluconazole), polyenes (such as amphotericin B) and echinocandins (19). However, there are clinical drawbacks to these drugs due to their toxicity (20). Therefore, identifying alternative antifungal agents with fewer side effects is required. Furthermore, since the majority of fungal infections are caused by biofilms, this provides an additional reason for the low success rate of treatment. Chitosan offers a flexible, biocompatible platform for designing coatings to protect surfaces from infection and decreasing the metabolic activity and survival rate of Candida species biofilms (21). The characteristics of chitosan, including its antiadherent and antifungal properties, mean that it is a strong candidate for treatment against fungal biofilms. In a normal conjunction, the C. albicans biofilm proceeds into early, intermediate and maturation phases of development. The extracellular material, as observed by microscopy, is predominantly composed of cell wall-like polysaccharides containing mannose and glucose residues. Biofilms grown on cover slips have a distinct biphasic structure composed of an adherent blastospore layer covered by sparser hyphal elements embedded in a deep layer of extracellular material. The structure that meditates cell interactions with the environment is the cell wall, which may be a viable factor in the adhesion of fungi to solid surfaces.

The present study analyzed the role of chitosan on C. albicans using the MIC. The results indicated that chitosan had high fungistatic activity against these planktonic cells. Repeated XTT reduction assay analysis revealed that chitosan at a concentration of 0.0313% had the potential to kill >50% of cells in the early and intermediate phases of biofilm development. However, a higher concentration of chitosan was required to kill cells in mature biofilms. Mature biofilms of C. albicans were significantly less susceptible to chitosan than planktonic cells and initial biofilms. The results of the current study indicated that an addition of exogenous chitosan to C. albicans biofilms reduced the metabolic activity of cells significantly and apprehended the adhesion of yeast cells to the polystyrene surface. Previous studies have demonstrated that the biofilm phenotype confers resistance to antifungal therapy, which is consistent with the results of the present study (22,23). Physical stress of the biofilm structure due to permeabilization of the cellular membrane, which permits higher levels of penetration by chitosan and a more effective delivery of its antifungal activity, may be the cause of this phenomenon (24,25).

Fluorescence and SEM techniques allowed the morphology and structure of biofilms to be analyzed in the present study. Fluorescence microscopy visualized the gross biofilm morphology and the appearance of the extracellular matrix during biofilm formation. SEM visualized the structure of the biofilms surface without distortion of the native biofilm structure. Progressing in three distinct developmental phases, C. albicans biofilm formation is divided into early, intermediate and maturation stages. The results of the present study revealed that in the overall biofilm formation period, the chitosan-treated biofilms exhibited a slower growth compared with those that were untreated. Although chitosan treatment did not completely destroy the yeast cells, the staining observed with fluorescence and SEM demonstrated that chitosan-treated biofilms were significantly inhibited in the formation of a complex network.

In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that chitosan may be developed as an antimicrobial agent against the treatment of clinically-associated fungal biofilm diseases. Although an inhibitory effect of chitosan on biofilm production by C. albicans was reported in the laboratory and in clinical isolates in vitro, further studies using animal models of pulmonary C. albicans infection are required.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (no. 81000745) and the Project of Medicine Science of Health Bureau of Chongqing [nos. (2009)66 and (2010)51]. The authors thank the Clinical Laboratory at the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University for providing the C. albicans strain.

References

1 

Hallahan AR, Shaw PJ, Rowell G, O’Connell A, Schell D and Gillis J: Improved outcomes of children with malignancy admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 28:3718–3721. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Booy R, Habibi P, Nadel S, et al: Reduction in case fatality rate from meningococcal disease associated with improved healthcare delivery. Arch Dis Child. 85:386–390. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Tenner PA, Dibrell H and Taylor RP: Improved survival with hospitalists in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 31:847–852. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Chen Yan-jun WF: Study on pathogens causing lower respiratory tract infections and their drug resistance. Zhong Guo Bing Yuan Sheng Wu Xue Za Zhi. 8:561–563. 2013.(In Chinese).

5 

Adair CG, Gorman SP, Feron BM, et al: Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 25:1072–1076. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Crump JA and Collignon PJ: Intravascular catheter-associated infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 19:1–8. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Maki DG and Tambyah PA: Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis. 7:342–347. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Douglas LJ: Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol. 11:30–36. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Blankenship JR and Mitchell AP: How to build a biofilm: a fungal perspective. Curr Opin Microbiol. 9:588–594. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Chandra J, Mukherjee PK and Ghannoum MA: In vitro growth and analysis of Candida biofilms. Nat Protoc. 3:1909–1924. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Carlson RP, Taffs R, Davison WM and Stewart PS: Anti-biofilm properties of chitosan-coated surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 19:1035–1046. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Alonso MJ and Sánchez A: The potential of chitosan in ocular drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. 55:1451–1463. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kulikov SN, Tiurin IuA, Fassakhov RS and Varlamov VP: Antibacterial and antimycotic activity of chitosan: mechanisms of action and role of the structure. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 5:91–97. 2009.(In Russian).

14 

Pasquantonio G, Greco C, Prenna M, et al: Antibacterial activity and anti-biofilm effect of chitosan against strains of Streptococcus mutans isolated in dental plaque. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 21:993–997. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Meshulam T, Levitz SM, Christin L and Diamond RD: A simplified new assay for assessment of fungal cell damage with the tetrazolium dye, (2,3)-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sul- phenyl)-(2H)-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT). J Infect Dis. 172:1153–1156. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Tsang PW, Bandara HM and Fong WP: Purpurin suppresses Candida albicans biofilm formation and hyphal development. PLoS One. 7:e508662012.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Albani JR and Plancke YD: Interaction between calcofluor white and carbohydrates of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Carbohydr Res. 314:169–175. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wisplinghoff H, Ebbers J, Geurtz L, Stefanik D, Major Y, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP and Seifert H: Nosocomial bloodstream infections due to Candida spp. in the USA: species distribution, clinical features and antifungal susceptibilities. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 43:78–81. 2014.

19 

Georgopapadakou NH and Walsh TJ: Human mycoses: drugs and targets for emerging pathogens. Science. 264:371–373. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Ramage G, VandeWalle K, Bachmann SP, Wickes BL and López-Ribot JL: In vitro pharmacodynamic properties of three antifungal agents against preformed Candida albicans biofilms determined by time-kill studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 46:3634–3636. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Martinez LR, Mihu MR, Tar M, et al: Demonstration of antibiofilm and antifungal efficacy of chitosan against candidal biofilms, using an in vivo central venous catheter model. J Infect Dis. 201:1436–1440. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Hawser SP and Douglas LJ: Resistance of Candida albicans biofilms to antifungal agents in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 39:2128–2131. 1995.

23 

Mukherjee PK, Chandra J, Kuhn DM and Ghannoum MA: Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols. Infect Immun. 71:4333–4340. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Rabea EI, Badawy ME, Stevens CV, Smagghe G and Steurbaut W: Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules. 4:1457–1465. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Sudarshan NR, Hoover DG and Knorr D: Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol. 6:257–272. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September 2014
Volume 8 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Pu, Y., Liu, A., Zheng, Y., & Ye, B. (2014). In vitro damage of Candida albicans biofilms by chitosan. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 8, 929-934. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1839
MLA
Pu, Y., Liu, A., Zheng, Y., Ye, B."In vitro damage of Candida albicans biofilms by chitosan". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 8.3 (2014): 929-934.
Chicago
Pu, Y., Liu, A., Zheng, Y., Ye, B."In vitro damage of Candida albicans biofilms by chitosan". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 8, no. 3 (2014): 929-934. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1839