VE/VCO2 slope and its prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure

  • Authors:
    • Yuqin Shen
    • Xiaoyu Zhang
    • Wenlin Ma
    • Haoming Song
    • Zhu Gong
    • Qiang Wang
    • Lin Che
    • Wenjun Xu
    • Jinfa Jiang
    • Jiahong Xu
    • Wenwen Yan
    • Lin Zhou
    • Yi Ni
    • Guanghe Li
    • Qiping Zhang
    • Lemin Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 5, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2267
  • Pages: 1407-1412
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope has been widely demonstrated to have strong prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), and the risk of mortality is believed to increase when the VE/VCO2 slope is >32.8; however, there is little evidence concerning the prognostic value of the VE/VCO2 slope in Chinese patients. In the present study, the prognostic value of the VE/VCO2 slope was investigated in patients with CHF. A total of 258 subjects underwent symptom‑limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and were divided into CHF (113 males and 16 females; LVEF <0.49) and control (106 males and 23 females) groups. The cardiac‑related events over a median 33.7‑month follow‑up period subsequent to the CPET were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The VE/VCO2 slope was significantly different between the CHF and control groups (Ρ<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the VE/VCO2 slope in predicting cardiac‑related mortalities in the patients with CHF was 0.670 (Ρ<0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity of the VE/VCO2 slope were 0.667 and 0.620, respectively. The optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac‑related mortalities in patients with CHF was ≥39.3. The AUC for the VE/VCO2 slope in predicting cardiac‑related hospitalizations in patients with CHF was 0.682 (Ρ<0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity of the VE/VCO2 slope were 0.631 and 0.778, respectively. The optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac‑related hospitalizations in patients with CHF was ≥32.9. In conclusion, ventilatory efficiency decreases in patients with CHF. The VE/VCO2 slope is a strong predictor of cardiac‑related mortalities in the patients with CHF analyzed.

Introduction

The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope reflects the increase in ventilation in response to CO2 production, and thus shows increased ventilatory drive (1). Changes in the VE/VCO2 slope may be induced by increases in the number of chemoreceptors, the peripheral ergoreceptor response, the ventilatory dead-space and also by the muscle mass engaged in exercise (25). Arena et al (6) reported that based on the VE/VCO2 slope, there is a 4-level ventilatory classification (VC) system (VC-I, ≤29.9 implies negligible risk of a major cardiac event; VC-II, 30.0–35.9, low risk of major cardiac event; VC-III, 36.0–44.9, moderate risk of major cardiac event; and VC-IV, ≥45.0, high risk of major cardiac event) which is currently used in clinical practice. Other indices, including peak oxygen consumption rate (VO2), anaerobic threshhold VO2 and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope, can be used to indicate the prognosis for cardiac-related events. Studies have shown that the VE/VCO2 slope exhibits a high prognostic value for cardiac-related events in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) (611), and the risk of mortality is believed to increase when the VE/VCO2 slope is >32.8 (12). The VE/VCO2 slope also provides useful information for the management of CHF. There is, however, no evidence concerning the VE/VCO2 slope and its prognostic value for cardiac-related events in Chinese patients, and there are no studies suggesting different VE/VCO2 slope prognostic values for cardiac-related events in Chinese patients with CHF versus non-Chinese subjects.

In China, the estimated prevalence of heart failure is 0.9%, and there are ~4 million patients with CHF. Furthermore, the number of patients is increasing annually (13). High morbidity and mortality rates, recurrent hospitalization and a heavy medical burden are common concerns in patients with CHF around the world. The aim of the present study was to investigate ventilatory efficiency by analyzing the VE/VCO2 slope in Chinese patients with CHF and to assess the prognostic value of the VE/VCO2 slope in this population.

Subjects and methods

Subjects

Patients with CHF were recruited from the Department of Cardiology of the Affiliated Tongji Hospital of Tongji University (Shanghai, China) between August 2007 and May 2013. The inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of heart failure (14) and evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on two-dimensional echocardiography obtained within one month of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) [patients in the registry with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥49% were excluded from the analysis]. Patients with a diagnosis of significant pulmonary disease (maintained on home oxygen therapy for lung disease and/or inhaled corticosteroids) were excluded from the study. A total of 129 patients (113 males and 16 females) with a mean age of 59.1±11.4 years were enrolled into the CHF group. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 24.7±3.7 kg/m2 and the LVEF was 0.38±0.09%. The cardiac function of the patients was classified according to the New York Heart Function Assessment (NYHA) as grades I–III (NYHA I, n=5; NYHA II, n=68; NYHA III, n=56) (15). Among the 129 patients, 74 were diagnosed with coronary artery disease with indication for cardiac catheterization, and 55 with dilated cardiomyopathy. During the study, CHF therapy was allowed to continue with digitalis (43.0%), β-blocker (89.0%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (91.0%) and diuretics (51.0%). One day before the CPET, treatment with digitalis, β-blocker, ACEI, angiotensin receptor blocker or diuretics was discontinued, but these treatments were re-initiated following the CPET.

In addition to the CHF group, healthy volunteers were screened for inclusion in a control group. Volunteers were excluded if they had been diagnosed with a chronic illness or were receiving chronic medication; if they had any current health complaints, an abnormal physical examination (including a blood pressure of ≥140/90 mmHg) or abnormal results on the screening tests [electrocardiogram (ECG), rest and exercise echocardiogram and spirometry]; or if they were participating in regular exercise. A total of 129 healthy age-matched volunteers (106 males and 23 females) met these criteria and were enrolled. The gender and body mass index (BMI) of the volunteers were also matched. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to recruitment in accordance with the protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Tongji Hospital of Tongji University. The study was registered in the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (registration no. ChicTR-TRC-00000235).

Echocardiography

Echocardiography was performed on each subject using the GE Vivid™ 7 EchoPAC™ system (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with a high-definition 3.2-MHz transducer. All data were measured by the same qualified physician. Standard M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography, as well as Doppler blood flow measurements, were performed in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines (16). Interventricular septum thickness (IVST) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) were obtained from the parasternal long axis view. The left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) were obtained from two-dimensional apical images. The LVEF was calculated from two-dimensional apical images according to the Simpson method (17), and the left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated according to the formula proposed by Devereux et al (18): LVM (g) = 0.8 × [1.04 × (IVST + LVEDD + LVPWT)3 - LVEDD3] + 0.6. The LVM was subsequently adjusted for body surface area (BSA) to obtain the LVM index (LVMI): LVMI (g/m2) = LVM/BSA.

CPET

The modified Ramp 10 protocol (19) was used to conduct the symptom-limited CPET with Variobike 500 exercise apparatus (GE Healthcare). Immediately prior to exercise testing the subjects were encouraged to produce a maximal effort. Analysis of the ventilatory expired gas was conducted using a metabolic cart (Innocur™ version 5.00, Breath-by-Breath; Innovision A/S, Odense, Denmark). Prior to each test, reference and calibration gases were used to calibrate the equipment according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Standard 12-lead ECGs were obtained at rest and during the exercise and recovery phases; blood pressure was measured using a standard cuff sphygmomanometer. Prior to exercising, the patients were asked to rest for 3 min. The exercise began with a 3-min warm-up at 0 W and 60–70 rpm, and thereafter a 10-W increment in load was administered every minute subsequent to exercising at 20 W for 2 min. Continuous ECG, manual blood pressure measurement and heart rate recording were performed every minute, and the Borg scale was used to rate the perceived exertion at each stage (20). Exercise was discontinued when the patients were physically exhausted, or developed severe dyspnea or dizziness. Several parameters were obtained through the metabolic systems during exercise testing, including oxygen consumption (VO2), VCO2 and VE. The anaerobic threshold was determined by the V slope (21). The VE/VCO2 slope was determined using linear regression analysis of VE and VCO2 obtained throughout the exercise period (22).

End-points

The subjects were followed-up for a median of 33.7 months (maximum follow-up period, six years) for assessments of cardiac-related mortality and hospitalization following the CPET via medical chart review. Any mortality or hospitalization that occurred as a result of cardiac dysfunction, as per the hospital discharge diagnosis, was regarded as an event. The most common causes of mortality noted were cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction and end-stage heart failure. The most common causes of hospitalization were decompensated heart failure and coronary artery disease.

Statistical analysis

All continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables are reported as percentages. The Student’s t-test and χ2 analysis were utilized to compare differences in the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The NYHA grades were compared with a nonparametric rank-sum test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate the predictive value of the VE/VCO2 slope for cardiac-related mortality and hospitalization. SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

General patient data

Table I shows the characteristics of the patients with CHF and controls at baseline. No significant differences were found in the age, gender or BMI between the two groups; however, the LVMI was significantly higher and the LVEF was markedly lower in the patients with CHF when compared with those in the controls (P<0.01). The peak VO2 was significantly lower in patients with CHF compared with controls (P<0.01). The VE/VCO2 slope was significantly higher for the patients with CHF as compared with that for the controls (P<0.01). The patients with CHF (n=129) were followed-up for a median period of 33.7 months (maximum, six years), and 19 cardiac-related mortalities and 198 cardiac-related hospitalizations were recorded. The control group was followed up for a median period of 37.8 months (maximum, six years) and no cardiac-related mortalities or hospitalizations were recorded.

Table I

Baseline characteristics for each group of participants.

Table I

Baseline characteristics for each group of participants.

CharacteristicCHF groupControl groupP-value
n129129
Age, years59.1±11.456.8±8.80.068
Gender, M/F113/16106/230.297
BMI, kg/m224.7±3.724.5±3.00.807
LVMI, g/m2138.8±46.5100.7±15.80.001
LVEF, %38±969±4<0.001
NYHA grade, I/II/III5/68/56129/0/0<0.001
β-blockers, n (%)115 (89.0)0<0.001
ACEI or ARB, n (%)117 (91.0)0<0.001
Diuretics, n (%)66 (51.0)0<0.001
Digoxin, n (%)55 (43.0)0<0.001
Peak VO2, ml/kg/min14.0±3.922.2±4.2<0.001
VE/VCO2 slope38.9±8.728.6±3.9<0.001

[i] Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise stated. CHF, chronic heart failure; M/F, male/female; BMI, body mass index; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Function Assessment; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; peak VO2, peak oxygen consumption; VE/VCO2, minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production.

Predictive value of the VE/VCO2 slope

ROC analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of the VE/VCO2 slope for cardiac-related mortalities and hospitalizations in patients with CHF. The area under the curve (AUC) of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac-related mortalities was 0.670 (P<0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.667 and 0.620, respectively. The optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac-related mortalities was ≥39.3 in the patients with CHF. The AUC of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac-related hospitalizations was 0.682 (P<0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.631 and 0.778, respectively. The optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac-related hospitalizations was ≥32.9 in the patients with CHF (Table II, Figs. 1 and 2). The univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope was significantly correlated with the number of cardiac-related mortalities and hospitalizations (P<0.05) (Table III). The survival model showed the efficacy of the VE/VCO2 slope in predicting cardiac-related mortalities (Log-rank, 7.2; P=0.007; Fig. 3) and cardiac-related hospitalizations (Log-rank, 8.5; P=0.004; Fig. 4) in patients with CHF.

Table II

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the VE/VCO2 slope for cardiac-related events in patients with chronic heart failure.

Table II

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the VE/VCO2 slope for cardiac-related events in patients with chronic heart failure.

End-pointAUC of the VE/VCO2 slopeOptimal thresholdSensitivitySpecificityP-valueAUC 95% CI
Cardiac-related mortalities0.670≥39.30.6670.6200.0210.549–0.790
Cardiac-related hospitalizations0.682≥32.90.6310.7780.0450.485–0.798

[i] VE/VCO2, minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production; peak VO2, peak oxygen consumption; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

Table III

Univariate Cox regression analysis for the VE/VCO2 slope in patients with chronic heart failure.

Table III

Univariate Cox regression analysis for the VE/VCO2 slope in patients with chronic heart failure.

VariableOptimal thresholdHRP-valueHR 95% CI
VE/VCO2 slope≥39.31.380.0171.14–2.28
VE/VCO2 slope≥32.90.710.0120.41–0.97

[i] VE/VCO2, minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production; HR, hazard ratio.

Discussion

CHF is a common condition with high rates of morbidity and mortality and a high incidence of recurrent hospitalization around the world (23,24). With the increase in the prevalence of CHF in China (13), it is imperative to develop a simple and flexible measurement to provide more beneficial information for the management of CHF. CPET remains an important and objective means of assessing the functional capacity of patients with CHF. During CPET, peak VO2 and the VE/VCO2 slope during exercise are traditionally considered to be the major indices influencing the functional impairment and prognostic value. Exercise capacity, as reflected by peak VO2, has been consistently shown to be one of the most powerful prognostic markers in patients with CHF (11,25,26); however, the peak VO2 has important limitations and may not be accurately obtained, as it is susceptible to influence by the movement such that a plateau is not always achieved at the peak exercise. By contrast, the VE/VCO2 slope is easier to determine objectively than the maximal exercise capacity, and the VE/VCO2 slope is elevated in the majority of patients with CHF. Numerous studies have confirmed that the VE/VCO2 slope has equivalent or even superior prognostic value to the measurement of peak VO2 in patients with CHF (8,2731).

The present results confirmed previous findings that the exercise ventilatory response was increased in the patients with CHF, as demonstrated by a higher VE/VCO2 slope. Patients who exhibit an increased ventilatory response to exercise also demonstrate a poorer exercise tolerance, as indicated by a reduction in the peak VO2 (32). Excluding the influence of matched factors, such as age, gender and BMI, the difference in the VE/VCO2 slope between the two groups was significant. By comparing the results of the two groups it was shown that the LVEF was lower, the LVMI and NYHA grade of cardiac function were higher and the peak VO2 was lower in patients with CHF as compared with the controls.

The present study demonstrated that the VE/VCO2 slope was a significant predictor of cardiac-related events in Chinese patients with CHF. The optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac-related mortalities was ≥39.3 in the patients with CHF, which was consistent with the results in another study, in which the end-points were mortality, transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation (optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope, ≥45) (21). Furthermore, the optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope for predicting cardiac-related hospitalizations was ≥32.9 in the patients with CHF. The present findings were also consistent with those in the study by Arena et al (33), which utilized the same end-points (cardiac-related hospitalization), and the optimal threshold of the VE/VCO2 slope was ≥32.9. Although β-blockers have been shown to improve the outcomes of patients with CHF, the results of the study by Arena et al (34) indicated that β-blockers have no influence on the prognostic value/characteristics of the VE/VCO2 slope. In the present study, the influence of β-blockers should be taken into account.

In conclusion, the present results indicate that ventilatory efficiency decreases in Chinese patients with CHF and support the proposal that the VE/VCO2 slope is a valuable prognostic indicator in Chinese patients with CHF.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the United Brainstorm Project of Shanghai New Technology among the top hospitals (no. SHDC12010117) and from the Shanghai Health and Family Planning Committee (no. WSJ1324).

Abbreviations:

CHF

chronic heart failure

CPET

cardiopulmonary exercise testing

peak VO2

peak oxygen consumption

VE/VCO2

minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production

BMI

body mass index

LVMI

left ventricular mass index

LVEF

left ventricular ejection fraction

NYHA

New York Heart Function Assessment

ACEI

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

References

1 

Johnson RL Jr: Gas exchange efficiency in congestive heart failure. Circulation. 101:2774–2776. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ponikowski P, Chua TP, Anker SD, et al: Peripheral chemoreceptor hypersensitivity: an ominous sign in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 104:544–549. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Metra M, Dei Cas L, Panina G and Visioli O: Exercise hyperventilation chronic congestive heart failure, and its relation to functional capacity and hemodynamics. Am J Cardiol. 70:622–628. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Clark AL, Volterrani M, Swan JW and Coats AJ: The increased ventilatory response to exercise in chronic heart failure: relation to pulmonary pathology. Heart. 77:138–146. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Franceschini L, et al: Skeletal muscle mass independently predicts peak oxygen consumption and ventilatory response during exercise in non-cachectic patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 37:2080–2085. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Arena R, Myers J, Abella J, Peberdy MA, Bensimhon D, Chase P and Guazzi M: The ventilatory classification system effectively predicts hospitalization in patients with heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 28:195–198. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Francis DP, Shamim W, Davies LC, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Anker SD and Coats AJ: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prognosis in chronic heart failure: continuous and independent prognostic value from VE/VCO(2) slope and peak VO(2). Eur Heart J. 21:154–161. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Arena R, Myers J, Aslam SS, Varughese EB and Peberdy MA: Peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope in patients with heart failure: a prognostic comparison. Am Heart J. 147:354–360. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Corrà U, Mezzani A, Bosimini E, Scapellato F, Imparato A and Giaanuzzi P: Ventilatory response to exercise improves risk stratification in patients with chronic heart failure and intermediate functional capacity. Am Heart J. 143:418–426. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Bard RL, Gillespie BW, Clarke NS, Egan TG and Nicklas JM: Determining the best ventilatory efficiency measure to predict mortality in patients with heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 25:589–595. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Arena R, Guazzi M, Myers J, et al: The prognostic utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing stands the test of time in patients with heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 32:198–202. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Poggio R, Arazi HC, Giorgi M and Miriuka SG: Prediction of severe cardiovascular events by VE/VCO2 slope versus peak VO2 in systolic heart failure: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Am Heart J. 160:1004–1014. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 35:1076–1095. 2007.(In Chinese).

14 

Radford MJ, Arnold JM, Bennett SJ, et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards; American College of Chest Physicians; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Heart Failure Society of America. ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with chronic heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Data Standards): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 112:1888–1916. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Fisher JD: New York Heart Association Classification. Arch Intern Med. 129:8361972. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, et al; ACC; AHA; ASE. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 16:1091–1110. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Lebeau R, Di Lorenzo M, Amyot R, et al: A new tool for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction derived from wall motion score index. Can J Cardiol. 19:397–404. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I and Reichek N: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 57:450–458. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Boone J, Koppo K and Bouckaert J: The VO2 response to submaximal ramp cycle exercise: Influence of ramp slope and training status. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 161:291–297. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Borg G: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 14:377–381. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Beaver WL, Wasserman K and Whipp BJ: A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol (1985). 60:2020–2027. 1986.

22 

Bard RL, Gillespie BW, Clarke NS, Egan TG and Nicklas JM: Determining the best ventilatory efficiency measure to predict mortality in patients with heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 25:589–595. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al: 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 62:e147–e239. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association and Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2014. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 42:98–122. 2014.In Chinese.

25 

Corrà U, Giordano A, Mezzani A, et al: Prognostic significance of peak oxygen consumption ≤ 10 ml/kg/min in heart failure: context vs. criteria. Int J Cardiol. 168:3419–3423. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

O’Neill JO, Young JB, Pothier CE and Lauer MS: Peak oxygen consumption as a predictor of death in patients with heart failure receiving β-blockers. Circulation. 111:2313–2318. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Sarullo FM, Fazio G, Brusca I, et al: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure: prognostic comparison from peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 4:127–134. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Arena R and Humphrey R: Comparison of ventilatory expired gas parameters used to predict hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 143:427–432. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kleber FX, Vietzke G, Wernecke KD, et al: Impairment of ventilatory efficiency in heart failure: prognostic impact. Circulation. 101:2803–2809. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Ponikowski P, Francis DP, Piepoli MF, et al: Enhanced ventilatory response to exercise in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved exercise tolerance: marker of abnormal cardiorespiratory reflex control and predictor of poor prognosis. Circulation. 103:967–972. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Guazzi M, Arena R and Myers J: Comparison of the prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing between male and female patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 113:395–400. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Francis DP, Shamim W, Davies LC, et al: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prognosis in chronic heart failure: continuous and independent prognostic value from VE/VCO(2) slope and peak VO(2). Eur Heart J. 21:154–161. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Arena R, Myers J, Abella J and Peberdy MA: Influence of heart failure etiology on the prognostic value of peak oxygen consumption and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope. Chest. 128:2812–2817. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Arena RA, Guazzi M, Myers J and Abella J: The prognostic value of ventilatory efficiency with beta-blocker therapy in heart failure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 39:213–219. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2015
Volume 9 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shen Y, Zhang X, Ma W, Song H, Gong Z, Wang Q, Che L, Xu W, Jiang J, Xu J, Xu J, et al: VE/VCO2 slope and its prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure. Exp Ther Med 9: 1407-1412, 2015
APA
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., Ma, W., Song, H., Gong, Z., Wang, Q. ... Wang, L. (2015). VE/VCO2 slope and its prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 9, 1407-1412. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2267
MLA
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., Ma, W., Song, H., Gong, Z., Wang, Q., Che, L., Xu, W., Jiang, J., Xu, J., Yan, W., Zhou, L., Ni, Y., Li, G., Zhang, Q., Wang, L."VE/VCO2 slope and its prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9.4 (2015): 1407-1412.
Chicago
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., Ma, W., Song, H., Gong, Z., Wang, Q., Che, L., Xu, W., Jiang, J., Xu, J., Yan, W., Zhou, L., Ni, Y., Li, G., Zhang, Q., Wang, L."VE/VCO2 slope and its prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9, no. 4 (2015): 1407-1412. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2267