Open Access

Protein intake and obesity in young adolescents (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Shumei Xu
    • Ying Xue
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 9, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3137
  • Pages: 1545-1549
  • Copyright: © Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The abundance of protein and its functional diversity in living systems makes it essential for virtually all life processes. Dietary protein and amino acid requirements are affected by age, body size, body composition, physiological state, and the level of energy output. The requirement for dietary protein is based on the indispensable amino acids under all conditions and under specific physiological and patho­logical conditions as well as the synthesis of dispensable amino acids and other nitrogen‑containing compounds. Previous findings have shown the influence of early intake of proteins on the development of overweight in healthy children. The present review focused on the possible association (if any) between protein intake and later development of obesity. The aim is to benefit physicians, dieticians as well as parents to understand future consequences of incorrect dietary habits in young adolescents and encourage healthy dietary habits to avoid obesity.

Introduction

Protein intake during childhood has a paramount effect on growth and development (1). It is an essential macronutrient necessary for building and repairing tissues, defending the immune system, coordinating cell activity, serving as a catalyst, and providing energy. Factors including food availability and absorptive capacity affect the quantity and quality of a child's intake of protein. Animal sources of dietary protein include meat, eggs, cheese, fish, and dairy (2). Protein is also found in plant products such as nuts, seeds, grains, legumes, beans, and vegetables. In general, animal protein varies from plant protein in that it has higher saturated fat content and contains cholesterol. Plant protein is higher in fibre and carbohydrates (3). Vegetarian diets, which are typically high in plant proteins, are associated with health advantages such as lower blood cholesterol levels, lower risk of heart disease, lower body mass index (BMI), lower overall cancer rates, lower blood pressure levels, and lower risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes (4).

Scoring systems have been developed to determine the quality of a dietary protein source by quantifying the amino acids profile (5). The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) is a measurement of the protein quality in human nutrition (6). The higher the PDCAA score, the higher the amino acid profile and quality of protein. Animal proteins (i.e., egg) and purified plant proteins (i.e., soy) have higher scores than plant proteins (i.e., wheat) with intact cell walls. Previous studies focusing on overall protein intake during infancy and early childhood showed that a high protein intake (>15% of energy) during early childhood may increase the risk of obesity. Furthermore, high protein intake during certain periods of childhood (12 months, 18–24 months, and 5–6 years) results in an increased BMI in subsequent years and even into adulthood. A child with a high BMI-for-age percentile has an increased risk of being overweight or obese in adulthood (710). The present review article primarily focused to impart knowledge pertaining to crucial relationships among protein intake and future aspects of incorrect dietary inputs based on quality, quantity and time of protein intake. The review covered important aspects essential for the proper diet of young adolescents in order to secure their future from the lethal effects of obesity.

Protein load and obesity

The ‘early protein hypothesis’, initially identified by Rolland-Cachera, suggested that a high protein intake in early infancy increases the risk of obesity (11). Infancy and early childhood protein intakes are of interest because of differing macronutrient distribution found in infant formula versus human milk and the stimulating effect protein has on insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin secretion (12). Insulin and IGF-1 have anabolic effects that stimulate growth in children. Higher concentrations are found in infants fed formula compared to infants fed human milk. However, children breast-fed during infancy are taller and have higher IGF-1 concentrations later in life (13). A low IGF-1 concentration later in life is associated with increased risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) facilitated through IGF-1. There is a concern that high protein intakes during the first years of life may cause obesity later by altering IGF-1 concentrations.

It is thought that infants experience a rapid increase of protein intake when transitioning to solid foods, typically 3- to 4-fold greater than the physiological requirements of the average infant (14). The protein energy percentage is 7–8% in infant formula, 20% in full fat cow's milk, ~5% in breastfed infants, and 15–20% in the typical family diet. In turn, breast-fed infants are shorter, weigh less, and have a lower BMI than formula-fed infants. Furthermore, an inverse relationship between IGF-1 measured in infancy and in late adolescence has been identified. The type of protein consumed may have different effects on IGF-1. For example, it has been shown that early intake of cow's milk increases linear growth in well-nourished populations by stimulating circulating IGF-1 (15). The risk factor for NCDs later in life is associated more with a poor protein quality intake with no animal protein than with high intakes of total protein. A systematic literature review conducted by Hörnell et al (10) aimed to assess the health effects of different intakes and sources of protein (animal- or plant-based) in infancy and childhood in a Nordic setting (10) The above systematic review concluded that a high intake of protein in infancy and early childhood is associated with an increased risk of obesity later in life.

A review by Martorell et al (16) examined the relationship between overall nutrition in early life and the development of adiposity later in life. Three hypotheses were posited: i) overnutrition increases the risk of later obesity; ii) undernutrition is associated with increased risk of obesity; and iii) optimal nutrition during infancy, the gold standard being breastfeeding, is protective against future obesity. Possible mechanisms for these outcomes include disruptions in organ function, increase in the number and/or size of fat cells or alterations in adipose tissue function, and dysfunction of the central nervous system resulting in appetite regulation disturbances. The authors of that study (16) reviewed observational, experimental, and quasi-experimental studies. Birth weight and adult BMI were used to indicate the influence of fetal nutrition on adult obesity. The results from those studies are conflicting. Some studies (17,18) identified a J-shaped relationship between birth weight and adult BMI, while others only found an association between high birth weight and increased adult BMI. A majority of the studies (19,20) found that higher birth weights, particularly birth weights >10 pounds, led to increased obesity in adulthood. In addition, intrauterine overnutrition is associated with a greater risk of obesity and may play a role in childhood obesity.

A longitudinal study conducted by Gunther et al (21) examined whether certain time points or periods of protein intake in infancy, early childhood, or the preschool years contribute to BMI at 7 years of age, and whether the association is attributed to distinct protein sources (animal, vegetable, dairy, meat, or cereal protein). The aim of that study was to investigate the validity of the early protein hypothesis, which suggested that high protein intake during infancy increases the risk of obesity later in life. The early protein hypothesis is based on the consideration that infant formula has significantly higher protein content than human milk and that children experience a rapid increase in protein intake when transitioning to solid foods. Previous studies (22,23) have failed to investigate whether distinct protein sources are associated with the early protein hypothesis. The study population was derived from the DONALD study (24), an ongoing cohort study that follows subjects through young adulthood. An average of 40–50 infants from Dortmund, Germany were recruited on an annual basis and examined at the age of 3–6 months. Up until early adulthood, investigators intermittently collected information from participants on nutrition, growth, metabolism, and health status. A similar prospective study by Scaglioni et al (8) examined the effects of the early intake of macronutrients on the development of overweight in healthy children.

Skinner et al (25) examined longitudinal growth and energy intake in children aged 2–8 years and identified factors associated with the children's BMI. Weight, height, and BMI percentiles were determined based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) growth charts. Dietary intakes from 3-day food records were averaged and analyzed using Nutritionist IV, version 3.5 (Axxya Systems LLC, Stafford, TX, USA). Each child was assessed 15–17 times by the end of the study and additional behavior information was obtained at certain time points. Dietary fat and dietary protein had a positive relationship to BMI whereas a negative association was identified with dietary carbohydrate intake. The findings suggested that childhood obesity is multifactorial and impacted primarily by BMI. Thus, the quantity and quality of protein intake during childhood affects BMI and body fat percentage (BF%) subsequently in life.

BMI and obesity

Children with a higher BMI-for-age and children who subsequently became obese ages had a greater risk of adult obesity. Childhood obesity also increases the risk of developing morbidities in adulthood. In a review, Maffeis and Tatò (26) addressed the association between childhood and adult obesity and the effects of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality. Rates of diabetes, coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, hip fracture, and gout were increased in individuals who were overweight as adolescents. Moreover, cardiovascular risk factors such as total blood cholesterol, blood low-density lipoprotein- and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and blood pressure levels and being overweight continued from childhood into adulthood. High BMI-for-age values can be a useful tool in identifying children and adolescents at increased risk of becoming overweight or obese in adulthood. Furthermore, dietary factors such as protein sources affect childhood obesity and should be examined as potential contributors in the development of morbidities in adulthood. Identifying dietary intake markers for increased BMI in children may assist with the development of dietary recommendations that may decrease the risk of developing obesity as an adult. For example, if a high intake of animal protein compared to plant protein predisposes children to obesity, dietary recommendations for increasing plant protein intake and decreasing animal protein intake may be developed. In the case that high intakes of animal protein is associated with a high BMI in children, parents can intervene during early childhood by providing adequate amounts of animal and plant protein for proper growth and weight maintenance. To ensure that healthy children are raised into healthy adults, it is important for the public to be aware of contributing factors to obesity.

Multi-factorial aspects of obesity

Previous findings have shown that the association between dietary inputs and resultant obese conditions in children are multi-dimensional or multi-factorial in nature. Possible mechanisms for the future outcomes of incorrect dietary habits include disruptions in organ function, increase in the number and/or size of fat cells or alterations in adipose tissue function, and dysfunction of the central nervous system resulting in appetite regulation disturbances. A majority of the studies found that higher birthweights, particularly birthweights >10 pounds, led to increased overweight and obesity in adulthood (21). A proportion of the causes of high birthweight may be attributed to early exposure to famine or gestational diabetes. The fetuses of mothers with diabetes are exposed to high concentrations of blood glucose, which leads to hyperinsulinemia and increased growth of fat, lean body, glycogen stores, and overall birth weight.

On the other hand, increased risk of overweight and obesity from undernutrition is not well understood and contradictory. However, it has been suggested that individuals whose nutrient intake is scarce early in life move to abundance or excess in adulthood. In addition, intrauterine overnutrition is associated with a greater risk of overweight and obesity and may play a role in childhood obesity. A longitudinal study conducted by Günther et al (21) evaluated whether certain time points or periods of protein intake in infancy, early childhood, or the preschool years contribute to BMI at 7 years of age, and whether the association is attributed to distinct protein sources (animal, vegetable, dairy, meat, or cereal protein). A previous study (8) confirmed an additional time period (5–6 years of age) as a sensitivity period of total and animal protein intakes for later body obesity. Thus, the quantity and quality of protein intake during childhood affects BMI and BF% in subsequent years. Future studies are needed to compare protein intake later in childhood and BMI as predictors for adult obesity.

Importance of dietary intake assessment in children and young adolescents

Assessing dietary intakes in children is a challenging aspect of nutrition research. Erroneous methodology often limits dietary intake data in outcome evaluations. However, this information is essential for advancing dietary recommendations for overweight and obese children (27). Selection of the appropriate measuring tool or method for dietary intake in children proposes a challenge in itself, whether it is a total diet assessment, a targeted diet, or related behaviours assessment. Each method depends on the dietary features of interest and the characteristics of the study population. The weight status of subjects and study design are important factors when selecting an appropriate methodology for dietary assessment (13,21).

Dietary studies on children and adolescents have identified a positive association between under-reporting and increased body fatness. Collectively, reports from large-scale surveys have shown a decrease in energy intake over time despite weight gain worldwide, suggesting energy expenditure has decreased and/or measurements of dietary intake are flawed (28). One cross sectional study examined the extent of under-reporting of energy intake in children between the ages of 4–18 years (29) The results of that study showed that the target group is also a critical element when selecting a dietary intake method.

Different age groups have varying literacy and numeracy skills, memory capabilities, attention spans, and cognitive abilities. For example, children <8 years of age have limited competency in providing an accurate dietary recall and children <10 years of age lack the conceptual skills required for reporting usual intake, serving sizes, and frequency of behaviors. Thus, assessing dietary intake in children <10 years requires parental involvement. The dietary habits and level of structured eating environment should also be considered for different age groups, as older children tend to consume more meals away from home and follow a less stringent eating schedule. Total dietary methods such as food records, 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaire, and targeted diet and/or behaviours methods have advantages and disadvantages (Table I).

Table I.

Advantages and disadvantages of dietary assessment methods.

Table I.

Advantages and disadvantages of dietary assessment methods.

Dietary assessmentMethodAdvantages and disadvantages
Food recordFrees participants from relying on memorySets a burden on participants
Includes a specific time periodProposes a challenge for participants to record foods not consumed within the home
Allows investigators to be trained in groupsAlters dietary habits of participants in some cases
Offers absolute and relative intakesRequires participants to have literacy and numeracy skills
Proposes a high cost
Challenges feasibility for large studies
Proposes a burden on participants due to necessary multiple records
24-h recallFrees participants from requiring literacy or numeracy skillsRequires participants to rely on memory for recall
Allows dietary habits of participants to be left unalteredProposes a challenge for estimating food quantity
Provides a low burden for participantsRequires training of investigators
Provides a quick assessmentProposes a high cost
Includes a specific time periodChallenges feasibility for large studies
Offers automated data entryProposes a burden on participants due to necessary multiple records
Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)Allows dietary habits of participants to be left unalteredRequires participants to rely on memory for recall
Offers a low burden for participantsRequires participants to have literacy and numeracy skills
Frees the training of investigatorsProposes a challenge for estimating food quantity
Allows administration in multiple formatsBypasses food descriptions
Offers a quick and inexpensive assessmentBypasses assessment of meal patterns
Allows automated data entryLimits data when FFQ is nutrient specific
Allows practicality for large studies
Offers assessment of total diet and select nutrients
Offers assessment of current or past diet
Allows participants to be divided into groups based on intake
Targeted diet and/or behavior assessmentsAllows dietary habits of participants to be left unalteredRequires participants to rely on memory for recall
Provides a low burden for participantsRequires participants to have literacy and numeracy skills
Allows practicality for large studiesRequires research before developing assessment
Offers a simple and inexpensive assessmentChallenges validity
Allows automated data entryBypasses the collection of of nutrient intakes
Allows trends to be monitoredLimits food intake information
Allows behaviors and environmental
information to be assessed

Body composition assessment in children and young adolescents

BMI is commonly used in clinical practice to represent adiposity status (normal, overweight, and obese) (30). BMI, formulated from weight and height, is an inexpensive and convenient indicator of body fat mass for most children and shows the relative position of the child's BMI among children of the same gender and age. BMI in children is often reported as a percentile ranking and subsequent weight status category. BMI is plotted on the CDC BMI-for-age gender-specific growth charts and is used to assess the size and growth patterns of children aged ≥2 years in the United States (31).

The relationship between BMI and adiposity was demonstrated in a study on Italian children with a wide range in age (32). Although a strong positive relationship was found between BMI and total body fat, BMI compared across different age groups can be erroneous and results must be evaluated cautiously. Total body fat was shown to increase with age while the percentage of body fat decreased with age. The association between childhood BMI and adult adiposity has been supported in some studies but refuted in other studies (33). A large longitudinal study aimed to compare the accuracy of childhood levels of BMI and triceps skin-fold thickness in predicting adult adiposity. The study found that childhood BMI-for-age was significantly associated with adult levels of BMI. This correlation was stronger among girlsand among older children (9–17 years). Adult obesity and excessive body fat mass consistently increased as childhood BMI-for-age increased, even among young children.

Conclusions

In conclusion, it is clear from the above citations that proper knowledge of dietary options is necessary to secure the future of young adolescents from the consequences of obesity.

References

1 

Hornell A, Lagstrom H, Lande B and Thorsdottir I: Protein intake from 0 to 18 years of age and its relation to health: A systematic literature review for the 5th Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Food Nutr Res. 57:2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Nutrition for Everyone. http://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/everyone/basics/protein.htmlAccessed. November 08–2014

3 

Adhikari BM, Bajracharya A and Shrestha AK: Comparison of nutritional properties of Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) flour with wheat and barley flours. Food Sci Nutr. 4:119–124. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Craig WJ and Mangels AR: American Dietetic Association: Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian diets. J Am Diet Assoc. 109:1266–1282. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ross CA, Caballero B, Cousins RJ, Tucker KL and Ziegler TRZ: Assessment of Protein Quality. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease (11th). LWW. (Philadelphia, PA). 2012.

6 

Schaafsma G: The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score. J Nutr. 130:1865S–1867S. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Michaelsen KF and Greer FR: Protein needs early in life and long-term health. Am J Clin Nutr. 99:718S–722S. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Scaglioni S, Agostoni C, Notaris RD, Radaelli G, Radice N, Valenti M, Giovannini M and Riva E: Early macronutrient intake and overweight at five years of age. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 24:777–781. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Michaelsen KF, Larnkjær A and Mølgaard C: Amount and quality of dietary proteins during the first two years of life in relation to NCD risk in adulthood. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 22:781–786. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Hörnell A, Lagström H, Lande B and Thorsdottir I: Protein intake from 0 to 18 years of age and its relation to health: A systematic literature review for the 5th Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Food Nutr Res. 57:1–42. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M, Akrout M and Bellisle F: Influence of macronutrients on adiposity development: A follow up study of nutrition and growth from 10 months to 8 years of age. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 19:573–578. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Madsen AL, Larnkjær A, Mølgaard C and Michaelsen KF: IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in healthy 9 month old infants from the SKOT cohort: Breastfeeding, diet, and later obesity. Growth Horm IGF Res. 21:199–204. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Larnkjaer A, Ingstrup HK, Schack-Nielsen L, Hoppe C, Mølgaard C, Skovgaard IM, Juul A and Michaelsen KF: Early programming of the IGF-I axis: Negative association between IGF-I in infancy and late adolescence in a 17-year longitudinal follow-up study of healthy subjects. Growth Horm IGF Res. 19:82–86. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kalhan SC: Optimal protein intake in healthy infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 89:1719–1720. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Hoppe C, Mølgaard C and Michaelsen KF: Cow's milk and linear growth in industrialized and developing countries. Annu Rev Nutr. 26:131–173. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Martorell R, Stein AD and Schroeder DG: Early nutrition and later adiposity. J Nutr. 131:874S–880S. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Zhao Y, Wang SF, Mu M and Sheng J: Birth weight and overweight/obesity in adults: a meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 171:1737–1746. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Yu Z, Han S, Zhu J, Sun X, Ji C and Guo X: Pre-pregnancy body mass index in relation to infant birth weight and offspring overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 8:e616272013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Schellong K, Schulz S, Harder T and Plagemann A: Birth weight and long-term overweight risk: systematic review and a meta-analysis including 643,902 persons from 66 studies and 26 countries globally. PLoS One. 7:e477762012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Yu ZB, Han SP, Zhu GZ, Zhu C, Wang XJ, Cao XG and Guo XR: Birth weight and subsequent risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 12:525–542. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Günther AL, Remer T, Kroke A and Buyken AE: Early protein intake and later obesity risk: Which protein sources at which time points throughout infancy and childhood are important for body mass index and body fat percentage at 7 y of age? Am J Clin Nutr. 86:1765–1772. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Koletzko B, von Kries R, Monasterolo RC, Subías JE, Scaglioni S, Giovannini M, Beyer J, Demmelmair H, Anton B, Gruszfeld D, Dobrzanska A, Sengier A, Langhendries JP, Cachera MF and Grote V: European Childhood Obesity Trial Study Group. Infant feeding and later obesity risk. Adv Exp Med Biol. 646:15–29. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Koletzko B, Broekaert I, Demmelmair H, Franke J, Hannibal I, Oberle D, Schiess S, Baumann BT and Verwied-Jorky S: EU Childhood Obesity Project: Protein intake in the first year of life: a risk factor for later obesity? The E.U. childhood obesity project. Adv Exp Med Biol. 569:69–79. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Kroke A, Manz F, Kersting M, Remer T, Sichert-Hellert W, Alexy U and Lentze MJ: The DONALD Study. History, current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nutr. 43:45–54. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Skinner JD, Bounds W, Carruth BR, Morris M and Ziegler P: Predictors of children's body mass index: A longitudinal study of diet and growth in children aged 2–8 y. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 28:476–482. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Maffeis C and Tatò L: Long-term effects of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality. Horm Res. 55(Suppl 1): 42–45. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Magarey A, Watson J, Golley RK, Burrows T, Sutherland R, McNaughton SA, Denney-Wilson E, Campbell K and Collins C: Assessing dietary intake in children and adolescents: Considerations and recommendations for obesity research. Int J Pediatr Obes. 6:2–11. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Rennie KL, Jebb SA, Wright A and Coward WA: Secular trends in under-reporting in young people. Br J Nutr. 93:241–247. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Brown D: Do food frequency questionnaires have too many limitations? J Am Diet Assoc. 106:1541–1542. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM, Pietrobelli A, Goulding A, Goran MI and Dietz WH: Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 75:978–985. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Growth Charts. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/Accessed. November 06–2014

32 

Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Allison DB, Gallagher D, Chiumello G and Heymsfield SB: Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: A validation study. J Pediatr. 132:204–210. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR and Berenson GS: The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 115:22–27. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2016
Volume 11 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Xu S and Xu S: Protein intake and obesity in young adolescents (Review). Exp Ther Med 11: 1545-1549, 2016
APA
Xu, S., & Xu, S. (2016). Protein intake and obesity in young adolescents (Review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 11, 1545-1549. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3137
MLA
Xu, S., Xue, Y."Protein intake and obesity in young adolescents (Review)". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 11.5 (2016): 1545-1549.
Chicago
Xu, S., Xue, Y."Protein intake and obesity in young adolescents (Review)". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 11, no. 5 (2016): 1545-1549. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3137