Long-term health effects of persistent exposure to low-dose lr192 gamma-rays

  • Authors:
    • Hongbo Li
    • Lin Wang
    • Zujun Jiang
    • Li Li
    • Zhifang Xiao
    • Zenghui Liu
    • Shuang Zhang
    • Hui Jin
    • Lei Su
    • Yang Xiao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 7, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3682
  • Pages: 2695-2701
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of persistent low-dose iridium-192 (Ir192) exposure on immunological function, chromosome aberration and the telomerase activity of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs), in order to increase clinical knowledge of the late effects of persistent low‑dose Ir192 gamma‑ray exposure. Patients (n=54) accidentally exposed to persistent low‑dose Ir192 were included in this 10‑year follow‑up study. Clinical symptoms, peripheral blood, bone marrow, cellular and humoral immune status, chromosome aberrations and the telomerase activity of BMNCs were analyzed in this study. Exposure to low‑dose Ir192 resulted in different degrees of clinical symptoms and significantly lowered complement C3 and C4 levels, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell levels, the lymphocyte transformation rate and the percentage of natural killer (NK) cells. It also led to increases in peripheral blood and bone marrow abnormality rates, chromosome aberration rate and BMNC telomerase activity. Exposure to persistent low‑dose Ir192 radiation resulted in different degrees of immune dysfunction, and abnormalities of blood cells and bone marrow, which recovered within 1‑3 years. Chromosome aberrations were observed to take 5‑10 years to recover. However, it would take >10 years for the telomerase activity of BMNCs to be reduced to normal levels. A prolonged follow‑up time is required in order to monitor clonal proliferative diseases such as leukemia.

Introduction

Iridium-192 (Ir192) is a radioactive isotope of iridium with a half-life of 73.83 days, which emits gamma radiation with a low level of linear energy transfer and a high level of penetration in the human body (1). Ir192 is frequently used as a gamma-ray source in industrial radiography to detect flaws in metal components (2). It is also used as a radiation source in radiotherapy; for example, it has been shown that Ir192 can reduce recurrent coronary restenosis following the initial percutaneous treatment of in-stent restenosis (3). However, exposure to high doses of Ir192 has a deleterious effect. It has been shown that the exposure of fingertips to 20–30 Sv Ir192 can cause progressive tissue deterioration and result in successive amputations of the fingers being necessary (2). An over-exposure to industrial radiography using Ir192 radionuclide may result in skin erythema, skin necrosis, progressive tissue deterioration and even malignant diseases such as myeloid leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma (4,5). It has been shown that acute exposure to large- or medium-dose radiation can seriously affect the blood and immune systems, leading to hematopoietic failure or hematopoietic tumors (6). However, the effect of low-dose ionizing radiation, particularly the effect of persistent low-dose irradiation on the human body remains unclear.

More than 70 people were unintentionally exposed to persistent low-dose Ir192 radiation in July 2002. The present study was conducted as a 10-year follow-up of those people, and was carried out to investigate the effect of persistent low-dose Ir192 exposure on immunological function, chromosome aberrations and the telomerase activity of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs). The effects of persistent low-dose Ir192 exposure on complement C3 and C4 levels, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, the lymphocyte transformation (LT) rate, and percentage of natural killer (NK) cells were determined. The abnormality rates of peripheral blood and bone marrow, the chromosome aberration rate, and bone marrow mononuclear cell telomerase activity were also analyzed.

Materials and methods

Patients

In total, 54 people exposed to persistent low-dose Ir192 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Worked within a radius of 10 meters from the radiation source during accidental exposure (between May 9, 2002 and July 19, 2002); ii) diagnosed by the Chinese Institute of Radiation Medicine (Beijing, China) as receiving an exposure dose of 0.05–0.65 Grey (Gy). The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Had been exposed to radiation before: ii) had cancer, tuberculosis, hepatitis or autoimmune disease; iii) had taken medicine in the previous 3 months. Among the 54 patients, there were 29 males and 25 females. The median age of the patients was 31.5 years (range, 20–42 years). The blood or bone marrow samples of the control group were obtained from 20 healthy volunteer bone marrow donors. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command (Guangzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in accordance with the IRB regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki.

General information

Clinical symptoms, abnormality rates of peripheral blood and bone marrow, immunoglobulin and complement (IgA, IgG, IgM, C3 and C4) levels, T cell subsets (CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+), the LT rate, percentage of NK cells, chromosome aberration rate and BMNC telomerase activity were recorded at different time points (1 month, and 1,3,5 and 10 years after exposure).

Blood tests

An HMX LH500 blood cell analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) was used to analyze peripheral blood samples. Bone marrow was taken by posterior superior iliac spine bone marrow aspiration, smeared, Wright-Giemsa stained and observed under an inverted microscope. Abnormal blood was defined by a white blood cell (WBC) count of >10.0×109/l or <4.0×109/l, hemoglobin (Hb) level of <120 g/l (male) or <110 g/l (female), or platelet count of <100 109/l. Bone marrow suppression, active bone marrow proliferation, and hyperactive bone marrow proliferation were defined as myelodysplasia. Morphological abnormality was defined as >2% of nucleated cells showing a morphological abnormality.

Tests of T cell subset

Cells were incubated with fluorescence-labeled monoclonal antibodies and were observed under a fluorescence microscope to calculate the percentage of positive cells. Briefly, BD Pharm Lyse lysing buffer was applied to human whole blood red blood cells (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) with a monoclonal antibody mixture and gently vortexed. Monoclonal antibodies include anti-CD3 antibody (cat. no. ab16669; 1:1,000 dilution), anti-CD4 antibody (cat. no. ab133616; 1:100 dilution), anti-CD8 antibody (cat. no. ab17147; 1:100 dilution), anti-CD57 antibody (cat. no. ab25629; 1:100 dilution) (all purchased Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Following incubation for 15 min at room temperature, the mixture was centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min and the supernatant was aspirated. It was added to phosphate buffered saline-fetal bovine serum (PBS-FBS; containing 1% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; and 0.1% sodium azide), the pellet was re-suspended with PBS-FBS after centrifugation at 200 × g for flow cytometric analysis. The absolute cell count and the marker percentage were calculated using FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences).

Chromosome aberration assay

Peripheral blood (3 ml) was collected from each patient and incubated at 37°C for 2 h to allow it naturally stratify. Cells from the interfacial layer (0.1 ml) were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 15% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a 37°C incubator. Colchicine was added to the cells at a concentration of 0.05 µg/ml 24 h after incubation. Cells were collected 48 h after incubation, stained with Giemsa, and observed under an inverted microscope. A total of 200 metaphase cells were counted and chromosome aberrations were analyzed.

Automatic karyotype analysis (G-binding)

The bone marrow culture was applied for the preparation of conventional chromosomes. Based on G-banding technology, chromosomal karyotypes analysis was developed and 20 mitoses were counted. Abnormal karyotypes were determined according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature 1995 (ISCN 1995). An AMMS-1 karyotype analyzer (Q500; Leica Microsystems GbmH, Wetzlar, Germany) was used in this experiment.

Measurement of BMNC telomerase activity

A telomeric repeat amplification protocol-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (TRAP-ELISA; cat. no. CB42542175; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was used in this experiment. Briefly, BMNCs were isolated by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (room temperature, 400 × g, 20 min). TRAP-ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 11.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The results were analyzed using Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. In all tests, P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Follow-up of clinical symptoms

The results shown in Fig. 1 show that 1 month after exposure, 90.7% patients exhibited clinical symptoms of various degrees, including dizziness, fatigue, memory loss or insomnia, bleeding gums, mouth ulcers, abdominal pain, diarrhea, heavy menstrual bleeding, palpitations or chest tightness, and alopecia. These symptoms were only observed in 7/54 patients (13.0%), 3/42 patients (7.1%) and 3/31 patients (9.7%) in the follow-up checks at years 1, 5 and 10 after exposure. Among the 3 patients who exhibited prolonged symptoms, 1 patient was exposed to a large dose (>1.5 Gy). No aplastic anemia, bone marrow failure diseases or leukemia were found in this 10-year follow-up study.

Parameters in blood and bone marrow

The proportion of patients with an abnormal WBC count was 44.4% (24/54) 1 month after exposure, and this decreased to 24.1% (13/54) 1 year post exposure, 18.0% (9/50) 3 years post exposure, 16.7% (7/42) 5 years post exposure and 9.7% (3/31) 10 years post exposure. Morphological abnormalities were observed in bone marrow granulocytes, erythrocytes and megakaryocytes. The morphological abnormality rate was 90.7% at 1 month after exposure, and this decreased to 18.5% 1 year post exposure, 12.0% 3 years post exposure, 9.5% 5 years post exposure and 12.9% 10 years post exposure (Table I). Erythrocyte morphological abnormalities included small red blood cells, giant red blood cells and immature red blood cells (Fig. 2A). Megakaryocyte morphological abnormalities were mainly exhibited as increased number of small megakaryocytes and original megakaryocytes. Granulocyte morphological abnormalities that were observed were mainly cell swelling, reduced number of cytoplasmic granules, karyopyknosis, spinous changes (Fig. 2B), vacuolar degeneration (Fig. 2C), toxic granulation and increasing number of myeloblasts and promyelocytes (Fig. 2D).

Table I.

Parameters of the blood and bone marrow of patients following Ir192 exposure.

Table I.

Parameters of the blood and bone marrow of patients following Ir192 exposure.

Abnormal blood results, n (%)Abnormal bone marrow, n (%)


Time pointNo. of patientsWBCHbPLTMorphologyHyperplasia
1 month5424 (44.4)7 (13.0)7 (13.0)49 (90.7)3 (5.6)
1 year5413 (24.1)5 (9.2)3 (5.6)10 (18.5)3 (5.6)
3 years509 (18.0)4 (8.0)2 (4.0)6 (12.0)3 (6.0)
5 years427 (16.7)2 (4.8)2 (4.8)4 (9.5)3 (7.1)
10 years313 (9.6)2 (6.5)0 (0)4 (12.9)3 (9.7)

[i] WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelet; Ir192, iridium-192.

Immune function parameters

Complement C3 and C4 levels were significantly decreased 1 month after exposure when compared with those of normal controls (P<0.01), and recovered to a normal level 1 year after exposure. No significant changes were found in IgA, IgG or IgM levels (Table II). At 1 month after exposure, the CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ T cell levels, LT rate and percentage of NK cells were significantly lower than those of the controls (P<0.01), and these values had recovered to normal levels by 3 years after exposure (Table III).

Table II.

Immunoglobulin and complement changes of patients following Ir192 exposure (g/l).

Table II.

Immunoglobulin and complement changes of patients following Ir192 exposure (g/l).

GroupNo. of patientsIgAIgMC3C4
Control201.88±0.3510.37±2.330.95±0.180.18±0.08
Experimental groups
  1 month541.96±0.349.59±1.43 0.62±0.14a 0.05±0.03a
  1 year542.14±0.3210.39±2.040.94±0.330.16±0.01
  3 years501.94±0.4210.20±1.620.87±0.140.18±0.03
  5 years421.93±0.359.92±1.331.04±0.470.21±0.03
  10 years311.91±0.2910.20±2.071.01±0.290.24±0.04

a P<0.01 vs. the control group. IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgM, immunoglobulin M; C3, complement component 3; C4, complement component 4; Ir192, iridium-192.

Table III.

Changes in the T cell subsets, LT rate and percentage of NK cells of patients following Ir192 exposure.

Table III.

Changes in the T cell subsets, LT rate and percentage of NK cells of patients following Ir192 exposure.

GroupsNo. of patientsCD3+ (%)CD4+ (%)CD8+ (%) CD4+/CD8+LT rate (%)NK cells (%)
Control2074.3±7.649.9±4.229.5±2.61.69±0.384.5±5.113.7±0.1
Experimental groups
    1 month54 49.1±5.1a 42.0±4.7a 20.8±2.7a 1.97±0.1a 48.6±2.5a 8.43±0.2a
    1 year54 52.3±4.8a 43.1±4.1a 22.1±3.8a 2.01±0.2a 60.5±4.1a 8.85±1.6a
    3 years5070.3±4.248.5±2.929.4±3.51.77±0.280.5±3.112.7±0.3
    5 years4271.1±4.049.4±2.328.3±2.51.80±0.386.9±3.812.1±0.2
  10 years3170.9±3.050.0±3.430.1±2.61.73±0.488.3±5.713.1±0.4

a P<0.01, experimental group vs. control group. CD, cluster of differentiation; LT, lymphocyte transformation; NK, natural killer; Ir192, iridium-192.

Chromosome aberrations

The chromosome aberration rates of the patients were determined at 1 month, and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years after exposure. The results demonstrated that at 1 month after exposure, the rate of dicentric and centric-ring aberrations was 4.76±0.37%, and the total rate of chromosome aberrations was 9.62±0.52%. The rate of dicentric and centric-ring aberrations was decreased to 0.96±0.15% at 1 year after exposure (Table IV). The karyotypes of 4 patients at 1 month after exposure are shown in Fig. 3. The chromosome karyotype of one of these patients exhibited three anomalies. These anomalies were Y chromosome deletions (Fig. 3B), Another patient exhibited X chromosome, and chromosome 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13 deletions, and chromosomes 11 and 14 had a derivative chromosome (Fig. 3D). The remaining two individuals appeared to have normal karyotypes (Fig. 3A and C).

Table IV.

Chromosomal aberrations of patients following Ir192 exposure.

Table IV.

Chromosomal aberrations of patients following Ir192 exposure.

Time pointNumberC+D (%)AA (%)SA (%)Chromosome aberration (%)
1 month   9,4004.82±0.653.06±0.231.05±0.059.62±0.52
1 year10,4000.96±0.150.81±0.130.19±0.011.83±0.39
3 years   9,2000.42±0.050.58±0.150.13±0.021.36±0.15
5 years   8,4000.20±0.050.47±0.320.09±0.010.82±0.24
10 years   6,2000.05±0.010.40±0.080.02±0.000.47±0.15

[i] C+D, dicentric and centric-ring aberration; AA, acentric aberration; SA, stable aberration; Ir192, iridium-192.

Changes in the telomerase activity of BMNCs

The telomerase activity of BMNCs in the experimental group (n=54) was 0.47±0.04 at 1 month after exposure, which was significantly higher than that of the controls. At 5 and 10 years after exposure, the telomerase activity of BMNCs in the experimental group was 0.32±0.03 and 0.18±0.02, respectively, and remained significantly higher than that of the controls (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Although the clinical symptoms of persistent low-dose radiation exposure vary due to differences in doses and the duration of exposure, the biological effects are mainly excitatory effects and adaptation effects. The irradiation accident in this study lasted 70 days; however, it was not possible to accurately define the exposure time and dose. According to the analysis of lymphocyte chromosome aberrations, the Chinese Institute of Radiation Medicine diagnosed that the exposure dose was 0.05–0.65 Gy. The majority of the patients' clinical symptoms had disappeared by 1 year after exposure. The reason why there were 3 patients who continued to exhibit clinical symptoms might be that these 3 patients were exposed to a large dose (>1.5 Gy). The hematopoietic system is highly sensitive to ionizing radiation. Large or medium-dose acute exposure can seriously damage the body's hematopoietic function, leading to hematopoietic failure or hematopoietic tumors (7). However, the impact of low-dose ionizing radiation on the hematopoietic system has not been fully evaluated. It has been observed that WBC counts exhibit a significant reduction following gamma-radiation (8,9). Researchers showed that in the Chernobyl accident, changes occurred in red blood cells, Hb levels, platelet quality and quantity in people exposed to <1 Gy radiation. They also found that the incidence of thyroid cancer and acute leukemia was significantly increased accompanied by an increase in P53 gene mutation among those who were irradiated during their childhood (1012), indicating that age, dose, frequency, time and different stages after exposure could significantly affect the quality and quantity of blood cells and the incidence of tumors. The results of the present study indicated that persistent 0.05–0.65 Gy Ir192 did not cause irreversible inhibition or damage of the hematopoietic system in the affected population, and it may be speculated that the human hematopoietic system is effectively able to compensate for the damage caused by persistent 0.05–0.65 Gy Ir192 exposure.

The body's immune system is also highly sensitive to ionizing radiation. Low-dose long-term radiation has been shown to enhance immune function (13), whereas high-dose exposure may inhibit immune function (13,14). The results of the present study indicated that humoral immunity can be restored in a short time period, and lymphocytes are extremely sensitive to radiation and their self-healing rate is very slow. It has been reported that immune disorders may be sustained for more than 30 years; the IgG, CD4+, CD8+ and CD16+ levels of individuals involved in the clean-up of the Chernobyl nuclear leak were significantly lowered and thyroid disease was identified in 59 cases in 385 participants (10). However, immune stimulatory and excitatory effects of low-dose irradiation were not observed in the present study, which may be associated with the special nature of the observed population.

The chromosomes of peripheral blood lymphocytes may be damaged by small doses of radiation leading to chromosomal aberrations. Thus, the estimation of a radiation dose by analyzing chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes has been widely recognized as a diagnostic method (1517). In the present study, the rate of dicentric and centric-ring aberrations was 4.82±0.65% at 1 month after exposure, and was decreased by 80% at 1 year after exposure. No aberrations were found 10 years after exposure.

It has previously been shown that ionizing radiation can cause DNA damage, and ultimately lead to nucleus swelling, shrinkage, dissolution and then apoptosis (18,19). However, DNA damage can activate telomerase activity, that is small doses of radiation are able to induce the expression of telomerase (20,21). Highly expressed telomerase may be able to lengthen telomeres to repair radiation-damaged cellular DNA, and has the potential to induce malignant hematopoietic cell clones (2224). The telomerase activity of BMNCs in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of controls even at 5 or 10 years after exposure, suggesting that after receiving the same dose of radiation, the recovery of BMNC telomerase activity takes more time than the recovery of hematopoietic and immune systems. Although no new aberrations or leukemia were found in the patients in the present study at 10 years after exposure, a longer follow-up time is required to conclude whether sustained high expression of telomerase is a risk factor of cancers or not.

In the present study, doctor billing records were used to determine when follow-ups occurred, but no information about the intents for these visits was available. Therefore, some visits may have been routine appointments, and some patients may have scheduled an appointment but not have agreed to follow-up.

The results of the present study indicate that exposure to persistent low-dose Ir192 radiation resulted in different degrees of immune dysfunction, abnormalities of blood cells, abnormalities of bone marrow, chromosome aberrations, and changes in the telomerase activity of BMNCs. Immune dysfunction, abnormalities of blood cells and abnormalities of bone marrow were recovered within 1–3 years in the majority of cases. Chromosome aberrations took 5–10 years for recovery. However, it appears to take >10 years for the telomerase activity of BMNCs to recover. A longer follow-up time is required in order to monitor the development of clonal proliferative diseases such as leukemia.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funds from the PLA Medical Science and Technology Research 12th Five-Year Plan key project funded projects (BWS11J071), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (05000138), and the Guangzhou Health Collaborative Innovation Major Projects (201400000003-1 and 201400000003-4).

References

1 

Milacic S and Simic J: Case report: Iridium 192 - health effects during 20 years after irradiation. Kobe J Med Sci. 54:E108–E113. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Jalil A and Molla MA: Accidental overexposure to 192Ir source in industrial radiography: A follow-up study. Health Phys. 62:74–76. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Moses JW, Moussa I, Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Fish RD, Ellis SG, Nawas D, Kluck B, Giorgianni JA, Donohoe D and Kuntz RE: Effect of catheter-based iridium-192 gamma brachytherapy on the added risk of restenosis from diabetes mellitus after intervention for in-stent restenosis (subanalysis of the GAMMA I Randomized Trial). Am J Cardiol. 90:243–247. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Inskip PD, Kleinerman RA, Stovall M, Cookfair DL, Hadjimichael O, Moloney WC, Monson RR, Thompson WD, Wactawski-Wende J and Wagoner JK: Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma after pelvic radiotherapy for benign disease. Radiat Res. 135:108–124. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Butenko ZA, Smirnova IA, Zak KP, Kishinskaja EG and Janok EA: Leukemia-associated gene rearrangements in blood mononuclears of subjects in long terms after radiation exposure. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 19:57–59. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Samarth RM: Protection against radiation induced hematopoietic damage in bone marrow of Swiss albino mice by Mentha piperita (Linn). J Radiat Res. 48:523–528. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Li Q, Sun H, Xiao F, Wang X, Yang Y, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Wu C, Wang H and Wang LS: Protection against radiation-induced hematopoietic damage in bone marrow by hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer. Int J Radiat Biol. 90:36–44. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Maks CJ, Wan XS, Ware JH, Romero-Weaver AL, Sanzari JK, Wilson JM, Rightnar S, Wroe AJ, Koss P, Gridley DS, et al: Analysis of white blood cell counts in mice after gamma-or proton-radiation exposure. Radiat Res. 176:170–176. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Sanzari JK, Wan XS, Krigsfeld GS, Wroe AJ, Gridley DS and Kennedy AR: The effects of gamma and proton radiation exposure on hematopoietic cell counts in the ferret model. Gravit Space Res. 1:79–94. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Kurjane N, Bruvere R, Shitova O, Romanova T, Jaunalksne I, Kirschfink M and Sochnevs A: Analysis of the immune status in Latvian Chernobyl clean-up workers with nononcological thyroid diseases. Scand J Immunol. 54:528–533. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Ivanov VK, Tsyb AF, Gorsky AI, Maksyutov MA, Rastopchin EM, Konogorov AP, Korelo AM, Biryukov AP and Matyash VA: Leukaemia and thyroid cancer in emergency workers of the Chernobyl accident: Estimation of radiation risks (1986-1995). Radiat Environ Biophys. 36:9–16. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN, Gnepp DR and Fagin JA: Prevalence of mutations of ras and p53 in benign and malignant thyroid tumors from children exposed to radiation after the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Oncogene. 13:687–693. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Bogdándi EN, Balogh A, Felgyinszki N, Szatmári T, Persa E, Hildebrandt G, Sáfrány G and Lumniczky K: Effects of low-dose radiation on the immune system of mice after total-body irradiation. Radiat Res. 174:480–489. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Cui YF, Ding YQ, Xu H, Liu XL, Jin W, Mao JP and Mao BZ: The effects of acute large dose of gamma-irradiation on immune function of mice. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 20:675–677. 2004.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

15 

Agrawala PK, Adhikari JS and Chaudhury NK: Lymphocyte chromosomal aberration assay in radiation biodosimetry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2:197–201. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Liu Q, Cao J, Wang ZQ, Bai YS, Lü YM, Huang QL, Zhao WZ, Li J, Jiang LP, Tang WS, et al: Dose estimation by chromosome aberration analysis and micronucleus assays in victims accidentally exposed to (60)Co radiation. Br J Radiol. 82:1027–1032. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Rozgaj R, Kasuba V and Simić D: The frequency of dicentrics and acentrics and the incidence of rogue cells in radiation workers. Mutagenesis. 17:135–139. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Watters D: Molecular mechanisms of ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis. Immunol Cell Biol. 77:263–271. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Lee JH, Kim SY, Kil IS and Park JW: Regulation of ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis by mitochondrial NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 282:13385–13394. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Neuhof D, Ruess A, Wenz F and Weber KJ: Induction of telomerase activity by irradiation in human lymphoblasts. Radiat Res. 155:693–697. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wang X, Liu Y, Chow LS, Wong SC, Tsao GS, Kwong DL, Sham JS and Nicholls JM: Regulation of telomerase activity by gamma-radiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Anticancer Res. 20:433–437. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Akiyama M, Ozaki K, Kawano T, Yamada O, Kawauchi K, Ida H and Yamada H: Telomerase activation as a repair response to radiation-induced DNA damage in Y79 retinoblastoma cells. Cancer Lett. 340:82–87. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sun J, Huang H and Zhu YY: Study on the expression of tankyrase in malignant hematopoietic cells and its relation with telomerase activity. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 12:11–15. 2004.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

24 

Wang L, Xiao H, Zhang X, Wang C and Huang H: The role of telomeres and telomerase in hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Hematol Oncol. 7:612014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2016
Volume 12 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li H, Wang L, Jiang Z, Li L, Xiao Z, Liu Z, Zhang S, Jin H, Su L, Xiao Y, Xiao Y, et al: Long-term health effects of persistent exposure to low-dose lr192 gamma-rays. Exp Ther Med 12: 2695-2701, 2016
APA
Li, H., Wang, L., Jiang, Z., Li, L., Xiao, Z., Liu, Z. ... Xiao, Y. (2016). Long-term health effects of persistent exposure to low-dose lr192 gamma-rays. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 12, 2695-2701. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3682
MLA
Li, H., Wang, L., Jiang, Z., Li, L., Xiao, Z., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., Jin, H., Su, L., Xiao, Y."Long-term health effects of persistent exposure to low-dose lr192 gamma-rays". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 12.4 (2016): 2695-2701.
Chicago
Li, H., Wang, L., Jiang, Z., Li, L., Xiao, Z., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., Jin, H., Su, L., Xiao, Y."Long-term health effects of persistent exposure to low-dose lr192 gamma-rays". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 12, no. 4 (2016): 2695-2701. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3682