Open Access

Effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats

  • Authors:
    • Teng Long
    • Tingting Tang
    • Yongqiang Hao
    • Zhenan Zhu
    • Litian Shao
    • Ming Liu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 15, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3904
  • Pages: 3951-3957
  • Copyright: © Long et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the role of simvastatin on osteoporosis of the vertebrae by examining the effect of simvastatin on the osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebra in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. A total of 60 6‑month‑old female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into one sham group and five ovariectomized groups, consisting of four simvastatin groups and one control group. Four dosages of simvastatin (5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/d) were administered by gavage for three months. L4 vertebrae were examined by dual‑energy X‑ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to determine the mineral apposition rate (MAR). L5 vertebrae were examined using a compression biomechanical test. Although the measurements from DEXA, pQCT and MAR, and the biomechanical parameters in the OVX + simvastatin rats were higher than those for the OVX + vehicle group, no significant differences were detected. Therefore, simvastatin may not improve osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebra in OVX rats or prevent osteoporosis of the spinal vertebrae.

Introduction

Statins are competitive inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, a liver microsomal enzyme, which are widely used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia (1). In 1999, Mundy et al (2) first reported that simvastatin and lovastatin stimulated in vivo bone formation in rodents and increased nascent bone volume in cultures from mouse calvariae. Statins have been investigated during the development of bone anabolic agents (3,4). Simvastatin is the most widely used statin, which has been the subject of extensive research.

In recent years, simvastatin has been shown to promote in vitro osteoblastic differentiation and inhibit the adipocytic differentiation of pluripotent cell lines or marrow stromal cells in individuals of all ages (510). However, few studies have been performed to examine the in vivo effect of simvastatin on ovariectomized (OVX) animal models of osteoporosis, and the conclusions to date remain inconsistent (1119). Previous studies have found that statins promote bone formation and mineralization and may inhibit bone resorption (1115); other studies do not support the hypothesis that simvastatin is able to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the fracture risk (1619). Potential reasons for the contradictory results among these experiments include: Large age range of the selected animal models (3–6 months); large drug dose range administered to the model animals (0.3–20 mg/kg/d), which exhibits a lack of clear criteria; and the bone sites examined varied, and included the tibia, femur and vertebrae.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic and systemic bone disease characterized by BMD and microarchitectural deterioration, which results in increased bone fragility and fracture risk (20). Fracture, which is the most severe consequence of osteoporosis, is associated with enormous costs and substantial morbidity and mortality (21); the risk of lumbar vertebral fractures in osteoporosis fractures is ~50% (21). Therefore, lumbar vertebrae were investigated in the present study.

To evaluate the effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis in the lumbar vertebrae, a postmenopausal osteoporosis model was created using 6-month-old OVX rats and various doses of simvastatin. The present findings in model rats may help to determine whether simvastatin is able to effectively prevent osteoporosis from bone loss in the axial skeleton in postmenopausal women. No analogous research has been reported in humans.

Materials and methods

Animals

A total of 60 female 5-month-old Sprague Dawley rats (body weight, 382±20 g) were purchased (Sino-British SIPPR/BK Lab Animal, Ltd., Shanghai, China) and housed in pairs at 22.2°C at 40–70% humidity with a 12:12 light/dark cycle and were allowed free access to water and food pellets consisting of a commercial natural diet (SIPPR/BK Lab Animal, Ltd.). Following 2 weeks of acclimatization to the research facility, rats were divided into six groups (n=10); one group comprised the sham group, and the remaining five groups were bilaterally OVX. From 2 weeks post-surgery, four OVX groups were treated daily with 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg/kg simvastatin (MSD Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) via oral gavage for 90 days. The remaining OVX group was the control group. Sham and control groups were administered a vehicle consisting of physiological saline for 90 days. Simvastatin dosage was adjusted every 2 weeks according to the weight of the rats. Rats were subcutaneously injected with 25 mg/kg tetracycline (Bio Basic Canada, Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) 15 and 5 days prior to sacrifice. All rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation following administration of 0.4 g/kg chloral hydrate (Baomanbio, Shanghai, China) anesthesia.

Bone densitometry

L4 vertebrae were harvested and prepared by removing the appendix, including the vertebral lamina. Subsequently, total BMD was determined ex vivo using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA). The Hologic Discover A (version 3.3.0.1; Hologic, Inc.) small animal model scanning software used for small animal bones automatically selected a small X-ray source collimator and employed a high-resolution protocol to scan the vertebra from the proximal to the distal ends. Following scanning, all the vertebrae from the respective rats were fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C for subsequent analysis.

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) analysis

L4 vertebrae were removed from 70% ethanol and scanned via pQCT densitometry in increments (slices of 0.8–1 mm) with 0.09-mm resolution. The median coronal slice was chosen for detection. All vertebrae were subsequently fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C.

The following measurements were obtained: Total bone content (TOT_CNT), total bone mineral density (TOT_DEN), total area (TOT_A), trabecular bone content (TRAB_CNT), trabecular bone mineral density (TRAB_DEN), trabecular bone area (TRAB_A), cortical bone content (CRT_CNT), cortical bone mineral density (CRT_DEN), cortical bone area (CRT_A), cortical thickness of circumference (CRT_THK_C), periosteal circumference (PERI_C), endocortical circumference (ENDO_C), and bone strength and mechanical properties in the three axial planes X, Y, and Z (SSI X, Y, and Z).

Bone mineral apposition rate

Following pQCT measurement, L4 vertebrae were dehydrated and the fat was removed prior to embedding in methyl methacrylate and subsequent sectioning into 50-µm-thick sections. Sections from each specimen remained unstained for epifluorescence microscopy. The mineral apposition rate (MAR) was calculated by dividing the distance between the two labels by the interlabeling period in days.

Bone biomechanics

The lumbar spine was mechanically evaluated via a compression test of the L5 vertebral bodies, which were removed from the −20°C freezer and thawed in steps. The vertebral arch and spinous and transverse processes were removed using a low-speed diamond wheel saw. Vertebral body specimens consisted of the cancellous bone core surrounded by the cortical rim. Prior measurement, bones were maintained in gauze with cold normal saline to avoid drying. Tests were performed using a Lloyd EZ20a system (Ametek GmbH, Munich, Germany). The ends of vertebrae were trimmed to provide two parallel surfaces and placed on the center of a stainless steel plate in the cranial-caudal direction. For each vertebra, a second stainless steel plate was lowered from above with a strain rate of 0.5 mm/min along its longitudinal axis until the vertebra was compressed to failure. The load-strain curve was recorded, which indicated the mechanical properties of the whole vertebral body specimen. Ultimate load (F) indicates the load-bearing capacity. Ultimate stiffness (S) indicates the maximum slope of the curve. Work to failure (W) indicates the area formed by the load-strain curve and coordinate axis. Other mechanical properties were calculated by normalizing the above mechanical data to the cross-sectional area (CSA) and height (H) of each specimen. Other properties included the ultimate stress (σ = F / CSA), Young's modulus [E = S / (CSA / H)], and toughness [T = W / (CSA × H)]. The structural property index includes F, S and W; the material property index includes σ, E and T (Fig. 1).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by analysis of variance followed by the least significant difference test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 11.5 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Bone densitometry

Treatment with simvastatin resulted in a dose-related decrease in BMD with the highest values observed at 10 mg, but this difference was not significant among the groups. BMD in the OVX + simvastatin groups was higher than in the OVX + vehicle group, but the difference was not significant. Notably, although the BMD in the sham + vehicle group was higher than that of the OVX + vehicle group, the difference was not significant (Fig. 2).

pQCT analysis

Values of CRT_CNT, CRT_A, CRT_DEN, CRT_THK_C, TOT_DEN, TRAB_DEN and SSI (X, Y, and Z) in the OVX + vehicle group were lower than those in the sham + vehicle group. Differences in CRT_DEN and CRT_THK_C were statistically significant.

Values of TOT_CNT, TOT_A, TOT_DEN, CRT_CNT, CRT_A, CRT_DEN, TRAB_DEN, PERI_C, CRT_THK_C and SSI (X, Y, Z) in the OVX + simvastatin groups decreased in a dose-related manner and the maximum value was obtained at 10 mg simvastatin. TRAB_CNT, TRAB_A and ENDO_C in the OVX + simvastatin groups increased with dosage, but the differences were not significant among the groups. Although all these measurements were higher than those in the OVX + vehicle group, these increases were not statistically significant (Fig. 3).

Bone MAR

MAR was unaffected by simvastatin treatment. No significant changes were demonstrated between the OVX + simvastatin and OVX + vehicle groups (Fig. 4).

Biomechanical measurements

F, σ, s, E, W and T were increased in the OVX + simvastatin groups, as compared with those values in the OVX + vehicle group; however, no significant differences were detected among the groups. All of these measurements in the OVX + vehicle group were lower than those in the sham + vehicle group, and the differences in σ and T were statistically significant (Figs. 5 and 6).

Discussion

Bone loss in OVX rats is similar to bone loss in postmenopausal women; therefore, the United States Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization recommend OVX rats as an animal model of postmenopausal osteoporosis (22). In previous studies, 3-month-old female rats have been used as an OVX model due to their sexual maturity (1113,1517); however, the skeletons of 3-month-old rats are not mature and continue to rapidly grow. The effect of anabolic drugs on osteogenesis may be unclear due to the effects of development on bone formation. Therefore, it is easy to obtain false positive or false negative errors, which influence the precise evaluation of drug efficacy in the treatment of osteogenesis and may be one of the primary reasons for inconsistent findings in previous studies (1113,1517). In contrast, 6-month-old rats have reached sexual maturity and peak bone mass (23). This is the optimal age for OVX rat modeling because the influence of bone development on osteogenesis can be avoided. Therefore, in the present study 6-month-old OVX rats were selected as a postmenopausal model (24).

Differences in drug tolerance between humans and animals are substantial; therefore, clinical doses of pharmacological agents must be converted into doses that can be safely administered to experimental animals to explore the novel functions of these agents. Currently, the maximum safe dose for oral simvastatin is 80 mg/day, and regular dosages include 10, 20, and 40 mg/day, which were provided in the simvastatin instructions issued by the U.S. FDA in 2007. Dosages were converted into rat gavage dosages according to the equivalent conversion of drugs between humans and animals (25,26) and the report issued by Illingworth et al (27), which investigated the clinical toxicity and equivalent analysis of simvastatin. Finally, simvastatin dosages administered to rats were divided into 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/day portions and administered by gavage. Therefore, the simvastatin dosages used in the present study were safe, reliable and clinically comparable to those in humans.

DEXA is primarily used to measure total BMD in animal experiments. It serves as a preliminary measurement for bone quantitative analysis and can quickly yield a macro impression of the bone quality of specimens. The present results indicated that the total (T)-BMD of lumbar vertebrae in the OVX + simvastatin groups had a tendency to gradually increase as the simvastatin dosage was reduced and was higher than that in the OVX + vehicle group. Significant differences were not observed.

DEXA is a two-dimensional detection method. T-BMD from DEXA is predominantly determined by cancellous BMC. However, the loss rate of BMC in cancellous bone exhibits marked variation after ovariectomy depending on the skeletal site measured. It has been reported that significant cancellous bone loss in the lumbar spine typically occurs by 180 days post-ovariectomy (24,28). The post-ovariectomy period in the present study was 90 days. This may explain why the initial BMD analysis by the DEXA did not produce a positive result. pQCT is a relatively novel and more precise 3D bone measurement method than DEXA. It is advantageous as it accurately distinguishes between cortical bone and trabecular bone and separately calculate cancellous bone histomorphometry, cortical bone structure and the relevant BMC and BMD; simultaneously, it can also be used to deduce bone strength and other biomechanical indices (2932). For peripheral bones and small animal skeletons, pQCT is more sensitive than DEXA and more beneficial in evaluating the effect of therapeutic interventions on different skeletal sites (33). Therefore, it is necessary to apply pQCT to scan the lumbar vertebrae by layers, which allows for separate assessment of the effect of simvastatin on the cortex and cancellous bones and helps to further confirm the experimental results.

The results of the present study indicated that the cortical PERI-C and ENDO-C values in the OVX + vehicle group were increased compared with the sham + vehicle group; however, the CRT-THK-C and CRT_DEN values in the OVX + vehicle group were decreased compared with the sham + vehicle group. These decreases were statistically significant. One reason for this may be that bone absorption in the endosteum prevailed over osteogenesis in the periosteum post-ovariectomy. The characteristics demonstrated were similar to the ‘pencil line’ or ‘picture-framing’ sign of the human vertebrae in postmenopausal osteoporosis, which indicates cortical thinning (34). This finding demonstrated that the CRT-THK-C and CRT_DEN values of lumbar vertebrae may be effective markers in the OVX rat model of osteoporosis when ovariectomy is performed <180 days prior and may be used as reliable indices for evaluating drug effects. The results of the present study showed that CRT-THK-C and CRT_DEN values in the OVX + simvastatin groups were increased compared with the OVX + vehicle group; however, these differences were not significant. MAR is a dynamic measurement that complements the statistical measurements of pQCT. However, no changes were produced by simvastatin treatment.

Although simvastatin did not improve BMD of the vertebral body in OVX rats according to the results of DEXA, pQCT and MAR, skeleton biomechanical properties are the ultimate indices of the assessment of bone quality that reflect the changes in bone structure (35). BMD may only represent 60–80% of bone mechanical strength, and the accuracy of BMD is <70% for the evaluation of the effects of drugs on osteoporosis. However, if the BMD value is combined with bone biomechanics, the accuracy of the assessment of the effects of drugs on osteoporosis may be as high as 90% (36,37). Therefore, it is necessary to use biomechanical analysis as the final measurement in the evaluation of the effect of drugs on osteoporosis.

Bone biomechanical characteristics can be divided into two parts: Structural mechanical properties and material mechanical properties (38). Structural mechanical properties include F, S and W, which reflect the changes in bone architecture and are predominantly affected by the geometric shape and size of the bone (36,39). Material mechanical properties include σ, E, and T, which represent bone mechanical characteristics that are not relevant to the geometrical shape of the bone, are calculated by the appropriate formula, and include bone area, bone height, bone diameter, structure mechanical index, and calibration factors (cross sectional moment of inertia) (36,37). These results showed that all of the biomechanical measurements in the OVX + simvastatin groups were increased compared with the OVX + vehicle group; however, statistically significant differences were not observed. Therefore, the biomechanical result was also consistent with the DEXA, pQCT and MAR results.

The findings of the present study indicate that simvastatin did not promote osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebrae in OVX rats, suggesting it has no effect on the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in the vertebrae.

References

1 

Bauer DC: HMG CoA reductase inhibitors and the skeleton: A comprehensive review. Osteoporos Int. 14:273–282. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Mundy G, Garrett R, Harris S, Chan J, Chen D, Rossini G, Boyce B, Zhao M and Gutierrez G: Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science. 286:1946–1949. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Meier CR, Schlienger RG, Kraenzlin ME, Schlegel B and Jick H: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the risk of fractures. JAMA. 283:3205–3210. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Wang PS, Solomon DH, Mogun H and Avorn J: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the risk of hip fractures in elderly patients. JAMA. 283:3211–3216. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Liu M, Wang K, Tang T, Dai K and Zhu Z: The effect of simvastatin on the differentiation of marrow stromal cells from aging rats. Pharmazie. 64:43–48. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Song C, Guo Z, Ma Q, Chen Z, Liu Z, Jia H and Dang G: Simvastatin induces osteoblastic differentiation and inhibits adipocytic differentiation in mouse bone marrow stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 308:458–462. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Sugiyama M, Kodama T, Konishi K, Abe K, Asami S and Oikawa S: Compactin and simvastatin, but not pravastatin, induce bone morphogenetic protein-2 in human osteosarcoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 271:688–692. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Maeda T, Matsunuma A, Kawane T and Horiuchi N: Simvastatin promotes osteoblast differentiation and mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 280:874–877. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Maeda T, Kawane T and Horiuchi N: Statins augment vascular endothelial growth factor expression in osteoblastic cells via inhibition of protein prenylation. Endocrinology. 144:681–692. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Maeda T, Matsunuma A, Kurahashi I, Yanagawa T, Yoshida H and Horiuchi N: Induction of osteoblast differentiation indices by statins in MC3T3-E1 cells. J Cell Biochem. 92:458–471. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Li X, Song QS, Wang JY, Leng HJ, Chen ZQ, Liu ZJ, Dang GT and Song CL: Simvastatin induces estrogen receptor-alpha expression in bone, restores bone loss, and decreases ERα expression and uterine wet weight in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 29:396–403. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Maritz FJ, Conradie MM, Hulley PA, Gopal R and Hough S: Effect of Statins on bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry in rodents. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 21:1636–1641. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Oxlund H and Andreassen TT: Simvastatin treatment partially prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss while increasing cortical bone formation. Bone. 34:609–618. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Dai L, Xu M, Wu H, Xue L, Yuan D, Wang Y, Shen Z, Zhao H and Hu M: The functional mechanism of simvastatin in experimental osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab. 34:23–32. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Ho ML, Chen YH, Liao HJ, Chen CH, Hung SH, Lee MJ, Fu YC, Wang YH, Wang GJ and Chang JK: Simvastatin increases osteoblasts and osteogenic proteins in ovariectomized rats. Eur J Clin Invest. 39:296–303. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

von Stechow D, Fish S, Yahalom D, Bab I, Chorev M, Müller R and Alexander JM: Does simvastatin stimulate bone formation in vivo? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 4:82003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Pytlik M, Janiec W, Misiarz-Myrta M and Gubała I: Effects of simavastatin on the development of osteopenia caused by ovariectomy in rats. Pol J Pharmacol. 55:63–71. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Yao W, Farmer R, Cooper R, Chmielewski PA, Tian XY, Setterberg RB, Jee WS and Lundy MW: Simvastatin did not prevent nor restore ovariectomy-induced bone loss in adult rats. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 6:277–283. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Rizzo M and Rini GB: Statins, fracture risk, and bone remodeling: What is true? Am J Med Sci. 332:55–60. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Reginster JY and Burlet N: Osteoporosis: A still increasing prevalence. Bone. 38(2): Suppl 1. S4–S9. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Canalis E, Giustina A and Bilezikian JP: Mechanisms of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 357:905–916. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Thompson DD, Simmons HA, Pirie CM and Ke HZ: FDA guidelines and animal models for osteoporosis. Bone. 17(4): Suppl. S125–S133. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Kalu DN, Liu CC, Hardin RR and Hollis BW: The aged rat madel of ovarian homone deficiency bone loss. Endocrinology. 124:7–16. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Jiang Y, Zhao J, Genant HK, Dequeker J and Geusens P: Long-term changes in bone mineral and biomechanical properties of vertebrae and femur in aging, dietary calcium restricted, and/or estrogen-deprived/-replaced rats. J Bone Miner Res. 12:820–831. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Food and Drug Administration (FDA), . Draft Guidance for Industry and ReviewersEstimating the Safe Starting Dose in Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers. FDA; Rockville, MD: 2002

26 

Food and Drug Administration (FDA), . Guidance for IndustryFood-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies. FDA; Rockville, MD: 2002

27 

Illingworth DR and Tobert JA: A review of clinical trials comparing HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Clin Ther. 16:365–385. 1994.

28 

Jee WS and Yao W: Overview: Animal models of osteopenia and osteoporosis. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact. 1:193–207. 2001.

29 

Gasser JA: Assessing bone quantity by pQCT. Bone. 17(4): Suppl. S145–S154. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Ma YF, Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Cointry G, Alippi R, Zanchetta J and Jee WS: Effects of on/off anabolic hPTH and remodeling inhibitors on metaphyseal bone of immobilized rat femurs. Tomographical (pQCT) description and correlation with histomorphometric changes in tibial cancellous bone. Bone. 17(4): Suppl. S321–S327. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Ferretti JL, Capozza RF and Zanchetta JR: Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. Bone. 18:97–102. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Eriksson SA, Isberg BO and Lindgren JU: Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int. 44:243–250. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Fujita T, Fujii Y and Goto B: Measurement of forearm bone in children by peripheral computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int. 64:34–39. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Quek ST and Peh WC: Radiology of osteoporosis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 6:197–206. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Turner CH: Biomechanics of bone: Determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality. Osteoporos In. 13:97–104. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Mondelo N and Zanchetta JR: Interrelationships between densitometric, geometric, and mechanical properties of rat femora: Inferences concerning mechanical regulation of bone modeling. J Bone Miner Res. 8:1389–1396. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Bauss F, Lalla S, Endele R and Hothorn LA: Effects of treatment with ibandronate on bone mass, architecture, biomechanical properties, and bone concentration of ibandronate in ovariectomized aged rats. J Rheumatol. 29:2200–2208. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Bouxsein ML and Seeman E: Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 23:741–753. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Nordin M and Frankel VH: Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. 2nd. Lea & Febiger; Philadelphia, PA: pp. 35–36. 1989

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2016
Volume 12 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Long T, Tang T, Hao Y, Zhu Z, Shao L and Liu M: Effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats. Exp Ther Med 12: 3951-3957, 2016
APA
Long, T., Tang, T., Hao, Y., Zhu, Z., Shao, L., & Liu, M. (2016). Effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 12, 3951-3957. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3904
MLA
Long, T., Tang, T., Hao, Y., Zhu, Z., Shao, L., Liu, M."Effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 12.6 (2016): 3951-3957.
Chicago
Long, T., Tang, T., Hao, Y., Zhu, Z., Shao, L., Liu, M."Effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis of the lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 12, no. 6 (2016): 3951-3957. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3904