|
1
|
Tamburrelli FC, Genitiempo M, Bochicchio
M, Donisi L and Ratto C: Cauda equina syndrome: evaluation of the
clinical outcome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 18:1098–1105.
2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Zicari AM, Rugiano A, Ragusa G, Savastano
V, Bertin S, Vittori T and Duse M: The evaluation of adenoid
hypertrophy and obstruction grading based on rhinomanometry after
nasal decongestant test in children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.
17:2962–2967. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Giampaolo M and
Palasciano G: Diffuse gastrointestinal dysmotility by
ultrasonography, manometry and breath tests in colonic inertia. Eur
Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 4:81–87. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Jiang SP and Huang LW: Role of
gastroesophageal reflux disease in asthmatic patients. Eur Rev Med
Pharmacol Sci. 9:151–160. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Kass MA: Standardizing the measurement of
intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye
Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology. 103:183–185. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Internationaler Standard für
Augentonometer ISO 8612. Beuth-Verlag GmbH; Berlin: 2001, (In
German).
|
|
7
|
Hu J, Bui KM, Patel KH, Kim H, Arruda JA,
Wilensky JT and Vajaranant TS: Effect of hemodialysis on
intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure. JAMA
Ophthalmol. 131:1525–1531. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Vyas P, Naik U and Gangaiah JB: Efficacy
of bimatoprost 0.03% in reducing intraocular pressure in patients
with 360° synechial angle-closure glaucoma: a preliminary study.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 59:13–16. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Matsuura K, Suto C, Akura J and Inoue Y:
Bag and chamber flushing: a new method of using intracameral
moxifloxacin to irrigate the anterior chamber and the area behind
the intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 251:81–87.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pürsten A,
Grein HJ and Pillunat LE: Effect of central corneal thickness,
corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch
Ophthalmol. 124:471–476. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Eldaly MA: Goldmann versus disposable
applanation tonometer tips in glaucoma patients and normal
subjects. Curr Eye Res. Aug 19–2015.(Epub ahead of print).
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Tamçelik N, Atalay E, Cicik E and Özkök A:
Comparability of Icare pro rebound tonometer with Goldmann
applanation and noncontact tonometer in a wide range of intraocular
pressure and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmic Res. 54:18–25.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Sinha G, Gupta S, Temkar S, Pandey V,
Sihota R and Dada T: IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound
tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and
without glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. Dec 16–2014.(Epub ahead of
print).
|
|
14
|
Farhood QK: Comparative evaluation of
intraocular pressure with an air-puff tonometer versus a Goldmann
applanation tonometer. Clin Ophthalmol. 7:23–27. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Lee TE, Yoo C, Hwang JY, Lin S and Kim YY:
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare pro
rebound tonometer and Tono-Pen XL tonometer in supine and lateral
decubitus body positions. Curr Eye Res. 40:1–7. 2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Lee YK, Lee JY, Moon JI and Park MH:
Effectiveness of the ICare rebound tonometer in patients with
overestimated intraocular pressure due to tight orbit syndrome. Jpn
J Ophthalmol. 58:496–502. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Sanz Borrego L, Morales-Fernandez L,
de-la-Casa Martínez JM, Sáenz-Francés F, Fuentes M and
García-Feijóo J: The Icare-pro rebound tonometer versus the
hand-held applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma.
25:149–154. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz
C and Frueh B: Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann
applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal
thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 90:833–835. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J and
Craig J: Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann
applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 17:43–47. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J,
Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, del Benitez Castillo JM, Wasfi M and
Garcia-Sanchez J: Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour,
rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology. 113:2156–2162.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Liu J and Roberts CJ: Influence of corneal
biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement:
quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 31:146–155. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D and Chiu R: The
influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry.
Ophthalmology. 115:80–84. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Moreno-Montañés J, García N,
Fernández-Hortelano A and García-Layana A: Rebound tonometer
compared with goldmann tonometer in normal and pathologic corneas.
Cornea. 26:427–430. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
