Correlation between PPAR-α methylation level in peripheral blood and atherosclerosis of NAFLD patients with DM

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) refers to a type of complex disease with excessive fat accumulation in hepatocytes that are the results of a variety of external and internal causes (1). Diabetes mellitus (DM) is closely related to NAFLD and can seriously threatens people's health. The number of NAFLD patients with DM is increasing yearly, however, its molecular mechanism of pathogenesis remains unclear. NAFLD complicated with DM has been considered a global health problem (2–4). Atherosclerosis manifests due to abnormal blood lipid metabolism, and current studies show that it is closely related to NAFLD complicated with DM (5). Previous studies have found that a subtype of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α), have the effect of regulating glucose and lipid metabolism, thus participating in the occurrence and regulation of hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia (6). A large number of previous studies have shown that DNA methylation plays an important role in metabolic diseases (7). There have been no report on whether PPAR-α methylation plays a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. In this study, NAFLD patients with DM were used as subjects to determine the relationship between PPAR-α methylation levels and atherosclerosis, providing a theoretical and experimental basis for clarifying the pathogenesis of NAFLD complicated with DM and finding new targets for the treatment of atherosclerosis.

Materials and methods

Sample selection

Patients that received physical examination at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from May 2002 to April 2016 were enrolled as the subjects of study, and their blood samples were obtained. Subjects were divided into either the healthy control group (group N, n=50), including 28 males and 22 females aged between 32–51 years, or the NAFLD complicated with DM group (group M, n=50), including 30 males and 20 females aged 38–62 years. All subjects had complete clinical data. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and informed consents were signed by the patients and/or guardians.

Main reagents

The total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) detection kits were obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bio-Engineering Institute Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The TRIzol total RNA extraction kit and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reverse transcription kit was obtained from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The mouse anti-human PPAR-α monoclonal antibody (dilution, 1:300; cat. no. sc-130640) and bovine anti-mouse IgG-HRP secondary polyclonal antibody (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-2371) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Philadelphia, PA, USA).

General data collection

The general information of the subjects, including sex, age, height, weight, past histories of drinking and hyperlipidemia, and a history of DM, hypertension and other disorders were collected using medical records combined with a questionnaire survey. The levels of TC, TG, HDL, LDL and liver functions were detected.

Determination of biochemical indexes

A total of 3 ml of fasting peripheral venous blood were drawn in the early morning, placed in a coagulation-promoting tube, and centrifuged for 6 min at 2,680 × g after natural solidification. TC, TG, HDL, LDL and other indexes of the subjects were detected.

Extraction of DNA in blood cells

The fasting whole blood was drawn in the early morning from the patients, and the anticoagulant tube was used to avoid hemolysis. After being placed at room temperature for 1 h, the whole blood samples were transferred to the polypropylene EP tube. All samples were uniformly encoded and stored in a cryogenic refrigerator at −80°C. The blood cell sample library was built for the PCR detection of PPAR-α.

PCR

A PCR instrument was used to amplify the target gene's forward primer 5′-AGTAGGGGCGGGTATGGTTTTTG-3′, and reverse primer 5′-ACCTCCTCAATAAACCCAACTCTACTACTC-3′, and the target fragment size was 133 bp. Amplification conditions were as follows: Preheating at 94°C for 5 min, 94°C, 58°C and 72°C for 30 sec, a total of 40 cycles, and extension at 72°C for 10 min. The optical density ratio of PPAR-α to the corresponding internal control, β-actin, was detected using an agarose gel electrophoresis, and the relative content of PCR products was determined.

Immunofluorescent staining

After hepatic tissues in N and M groups were fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 48 h, they were embedded into paraffin and prepared into 5 µm-thick section slides. Paraffin sections were dewaxed with xylene, dehydrated with alcohol at a gradient concentration and repaired with antigens. Then, the sections were rinsed with 0.01 M polybutylene succinate (PBS) (pH 7.4) 3 times (5 min/time). Then, the sections were stored in a 10% BSA wet box for 30 min at 37°C. The appropriately diluted (1:70) fluorescence-labeled antibodies was dropped onto the sections and placed in a wet box for incubation overnight at 4°C. After being washed with PBS 3 times (5 min/time), the fluorescence secondary antibodies (diluted at 1:100) were dropped and incubated for 2 h in a wet box at 37°C. Finally, sections were sealed using buffered glycerinum, followed by observation under the fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

The experimental data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). The experimental results were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. The means between both groups were compared using the t-test. The mean among the groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The p-test was used for pairwise comparison. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

Comparison of subjects

The height and body weight of group M were on average 162.00±6.12 and 64.21±7.31, respectively. Subjects in group N had a height and body weight of 165.22±8.21 and 62.97±9.21, respectively. Differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). BMI in group M was 24.69±2.93, which was significantly higher than that in group N (23.31±2.14) (P<0.05).

Biochemical indexes

As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, TC, TG, HDL and LDL were significantly different between groups N and M (P<0.05). Our results showed that patients in group M suffered from dyslipidemia, and NAFLD patients with DM suffered from atherosclerosis compared to group N.

Figure 1. Expression of TC and TG in groups N and M. Compared with group N, **P<0.01.

Figure 2. Expression of HDL and LDL in groups N and M. Compared with group N, **P<0.01.

Observation of pathological situation via H&E staining

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of normal liver tissues and liver tissues of NAFLD patients with DM were used to determine the pathological differences between each sample. Compared to normal liver tissue sections, substantial fatty degeneration occurred, lipid droplets were visible in the liver, liver tissue structures were changed and a large number of hepatocytes had swelling and injury in group M. As shown in Fig. 3, there was a significant difference in the histopathology between normal liver tissues and liver tissues of NAFLD patients with DM.

Figure 3. H&E staining results of liver tissues in groups N and M (×400). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction results

RNA was extracted from normal liver tissues and liver tissues of NAFLD patients with DM. PCR amplification showed that the expression of PPAR-α in normal liver tissue was significantly higher than that in liver tissues of NAFLD patients with DM (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Expression of PPAR-α mRNA in groups N and M. PPAR-α peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α.

Immunofluorescence staining results

As shown in Fig. 5, PPAR-α was highly expressed in normal liver tissues, but rarely expressed in liver tissues of NAFLD patients with DM. Our results suggested that PPAR-α plays an important role in the development and progression of atherosclerosis induced by NAFLD complicated with DM.

Figure 5. Immunofluorescence staining results of PPAR-α protein in groups N and M (magnification, ×400). PPAR-α peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α.

Discussion

Improvement in living standards in previous years have led to changes in the dietary structure and lifestyle. Currently, the incidence rate of NAFLD and DM have also shown a significantly rising trend (8,9). NAFLD complicated with DM is a complex disease that affects fat metabolism and glucose metabolism due to a variety of factors, including external and internal causes (10). It may gradually develop into more serious diseases or even threaten life and health if left untreated. Therefore, research on prevention and treatment of NAFLD complicated with DM has increasingly become a research hotspot and focus for all of society and the medical community. NAFLD patients with DM suffer from hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, high cholesterol, insulin resistance and other pathological symptoms (11). In the long term, the cardiovascular system may suffer, and NAFLD complicated with DM is closely related to the occurrence of atherosclerosis (12). However, the therapeutic approach of NAFLD complicated with DM remains to be studied, and the molecular mechanism of its pathogenesis is also unclear. Therefore, more studies are needed to explore this field.

PPAR is a class of transcription factors that are activated by a ligand, which belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily (13). There are three subtypes of PPARs that are encoded by different genes, with differing structures and functions. PPAR-α mainly exists in the fat, liver, heart, kidney, stomach and duodenal mucosa. It is also highly expressed in the pancreas islet (14). Previous findings have shown that PPAR-α binds to a ligand and plays a role in a variety of biological effects. PPAR-α has the effect of regulating glucose-lipid metabolism, inflammation, immunity and cell differentiation. PPAR-α-mediated fatty acid oxidation and fat metabolism are particularly important (15). PPAR-α target gene is related to lipid transport and metabolic pathways, which can adjust the expression of fat absorption and metabolism-related genes with a close relationship with the occurrence and development of a variety of metabolic diseases (16). PPAR-α is involved in lipid metabolism and regulation of inflammation and cell differentiation through a variety of mechanisms. In this manner, PPAR-α may play an important regulatory role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD complicated with DM.

DNA methylation is one of the most characteristic markers of epigenetics, as well as the most in-depth mechanism of epigenetic research (17). The active methyl is transferred to the C5 of the cytosine by catalysis of DNA methyltransferase to form methylcystein. Therefore, methylation is generally associated with gene silencing, whereas demethylation can often re-activate silencing genes (18,19). Previous findings have shown that DNA methylation is important in metabolic diseases. Based on the findings, our results suggest that methylation of PPAR-α plays an important role in the occurrence and development of NAFLD complicated with DM (20). In the present study, the levels of TC, TG, HDL and LDL in the diseases and control populations were determined, and PCR and immunofluorescence were used to detect PPAR-α expression in both groups. The role of PPAR-α methylation in the pathogenesis of NAFLD complicated with DM and its correlation with atherosclerosis were clarified, providing theoretical support for targeted therapy of NAFLD complicated with DM.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References