|
1
|
Bayoumi AB, Efe IE, Berk S, Kasper EM,
Toktas ZO and Konya D: Posterior rigid instrumentation of C7:
Surgical considerations and biomechanics at the cervicothoracic
junction. A Review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 111:216–226.
2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Cho W, Maeda T, Park Y, Buchowski JM, Nabb
CE and Riew D: The incidence of bifid C7 spinous processes. Global
Spine J. 2:99–104. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Greiner TM: Shape analysis of the cervical
spinous process. Clin Anat. 30:894–900. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Asvat R: The configuration of cervical
spinous processes in black and white South African skeletal
samples. J Forensic Sci. 57:176–181. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Hong JT, Yi JS, Kim JT, Ji C, Ryu KS and
Park CK: Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and
C7 for posterior instrumentation-review of 25 cases and comparison
of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation. World Neurosurg.
73:112–118. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Tse MS, Chan CH, Wong KK and Wong WC:
Quantitative anatomy of C7 vetebra in southern chinese for
insertion of lateral mass screwsand pedicle screw. Asian Spine J.
10:705–710. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Kothe R, Ruther W, Schneider E and Linkeet
B: Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the
subaxial cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29:1869–1875. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Ono A, Tonosaki Y, Yokoyama T, Aburakawa
S, Takeuchi K, Numasawa T, Wada K, Kachi T and Toh S: Surgical
anatomy of the nuchal muscles in the posterior cervicothoracic
junction: Significance of the preservation of the C7 spinous
process in cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
33:E349–E354. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Liao W, Guo L, Bao H and Wanget L:
Morphometric analysis of the seventh cervical vertebra for pedicle
screw insertion. Indian J Orthop. 49:272–277. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Barrey C, Cotton F, Jund J, Mertens P and
Perrin G: Transpedicular screwing of the seventh cervical vertebra:
Anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg Radiol Anat.
25:354–360. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Tomasino A, Parikh K, Koller H, Zink W,
Tsiouris AJ, Steinberger J and Härtl R: The vertebral artery and
the cervical pedicle: Morphometric analysis of a critical
neighborhood. J Neurosurg Spine. 13:52–60. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, Marneffe V,
Triffaux M and George B: Anatomical variations of the V2 segment of
the vertebral artery. Neurosurgery. 59:ONS20–ONS24. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Jovanoviic MS: A comparative study of the
foramen transversarium of the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae.
Surg Radiol Anart. 12:167–172. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Schell A, Rhee JM, Holbrook J, Lenehan E
and Park KY: Assessing foraminal stenosis in the cervical spine: A
comparison of three-dimensional computed tomographic surface
reconstruction to two-dimensional modalities. Global Spine J.
7:266–271. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Shin S, Yoon DM and Yoon KB:
Identification of the correct cervical level by palpation of
spinous processes. Anesth Analg. 112:1232–1235. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Ingram LA, Snodgrass SJ and Rivett DA:
Comparison of cervical spine stiffness in individuals with chronic
nonspecific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals. J Orthop Sports
Phys Ther. 45:162–169. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Robinson R, Robinson HS, Bjorke G and
Kvaleet A: Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for
identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5. Man Ther.
14:409–414. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Hogan Q: Anatomy of the neuraxis. Cousins
MJ, Carr DB, Horlocker TT and Bridenbaugh TH: Cousins and
Bridenbaugh's Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Pain
Medicine. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins; pp. 181–212. 2009
|
|
19
|
Cooperstein R and Haneline MT: Spinous
process palpation using the scapular tip as a landmark vs. a
radiographic criterion standard. J Chiropr Med. 6:87–93. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Zenmyo M, Komiya S, Hamada T and Inouee A:
A solitary bone cyst in the spinous process of the cervical spine:
A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25:641–642. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Zhang P, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Ding WY, Xu JX
and Cao JM: Preserving the C7 spinous process in laminectomy
combined with lateral mass screw to prevent axial symptom. J Orthop
Sci. 16:492–497. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Takeuchi T and Shono Y: Importance of
preserving the C7 spinous process and attached nuchal ligament in
French-door laminoplasty to reduce postoperative axial symptoms.
Eur Spine J. 16:1417–1422. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Umeda M, Sasai K, Kushida T, Wakabayashi
E, Maruyama T, Ikeura A and Iida H: A less-invasive cervical
laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy that preserves the
semispinalis cervicis muscles and nuchal ligament. J Neurosurg
Spine. 18:545–552. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Mori E, Ueta T, Maeda T, Yugué I, Kawano O
and Shiba K: Effect of preservation of the C-6 spinous process and
its paraspinal muscular attachment on the prevention of
postoperative axial neck pain in C3-6 laminoplasty. J Neurosurg
Spine. 22:221–229. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Kato M, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Dohzono S,
Toyoda H, Fukushima W, Kondo K and Matsuda H: Effect of preserving
paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective
cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33:E455–E459. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Zhang P, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Ding WY, Xu JX
and Cao JM: Preserving the C7 spinous process in laminectomy
combined with lateral mass screw to preventaxial symptom. J Orthop
Sci. 16:492–497. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Fujii R and
Yoshikawa H: C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with
significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J.
15:1375–1379. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Secer HI, Harman F, Aytar MH and Kahraman
S: Open-door laminoplasty with preservation of muscle attachments
of C2 and C7 for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, retrospective
study. Turk Neurosurg. 28:257–262. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Karaikovic EE, Kunakornsawat S, Daubs MD,
Madsen TW and Gaines RW Jr: Surgical anatomy of the cervical
pedicles: Landmarks for posterior cervical pedicle entrance
localization. J Spine Disord. 13:63–72. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Bazaldúa CJJ, González LA, Gómez SA,
Villarreal SE, Velázquez GSE, Sánchez UA, Elizondo-Omaña RE and
Guznán LS: Morphometric study of cervical vertebrae C3-C7 in a
population from Northeastern Mexico. Int J Morphol. 29:325–330.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Parashar R, Saxena D, Chauhan S, Arora R
and Abhijeet J: A morphometric study of pedicle, lamina and spinous
process of C3-C7 vertebrae in Rajasthan population. Int J Res Med.
3:140–145. 2014.
|
|
32
|
Prabavathy G, Philip XC, Arthi G and
Sadeesh T: Morphometric study of cervical vertebrae C3-C7 in South
Indian population-A clinicoanatomical approach. Italian J Anat
Embryol. 122:49–57. 2017.
|
|
33
|
Rhee JM, Kraiwattanapong C and Hutton WC:
A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct
stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: A biomechanical study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30:E636–E640. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Ramos-Peek J: Alarm criteria for cervical,
thoracic and lumbar pedicle crews. Clini Neurophysiol.
127:e304–e305. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Wu C, Chen C, Wu W, Zhao W, Sun P, Fan J,
Bi Z, Zhang J and Ouyang J: Biomechanical analysis of differential
pull-out strengths of bone screws using cervical anterior
transpedicular technique in normal and osteoporotic cervical
cadaveric spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 40:E1–E8. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Fan D, Song R, Zhang M, Bai R, Li Y, Zhang
Z, Wu H, Wang Y, Zhao L, Gao W, et al: Guideline for C1 lateral
mass and C2 pedicle screw choices in children younger than 6 years.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 42:E949–E955. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Kajino T, Taneichi H, Suda K and Kaneda K:
Surgical Anatomy for Pedicle Screw Placement in the Cervical Spine.
J Japan Spine Res Soc. 15:141–142. 2004.
|
|
38
|
Lee H, Hong JT, Kim IS, Kim MS, Sung JH
and Lee SW: Anatomic feasibility of posterior cervical pedicle
screw placement in children: Computerized tomographic analysis of
children under 10 years old. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 56:475–481.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Melamed KH, Abtin F, Barjaktarevic I and
Cooper CB: Diagnostic value of quantitative chest CT scan in a case
of spontaneous pneumothorax. Chest. 152:e109–e114. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Feng ST, Zhu H, Peng Z, Huang L, Dong Z,
Xu L, Huang K, Yang X, Lin Z and Li ZP: An individually optimized
protocol of contrast medium injection in enhanced CT scan for liver
imaging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2017:73504292017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Riaz S, Naz F, Bashir H and Niazi IK:
‘Bottle Brush Sign’-spinal meningeal disease on 18F-FDG PET-CT
scan. Clin Nucl Med. 41:726–727. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
