Therapeutic effect of MIPPSO in the thoracolumbar vertebra fracture
- Authors:
- Kewei Ren
- Jilei Tang
- Xuefeng Jiang
- Luming Nong
- Yanqing Gu
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Orthopedics, Τhe Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical School, Jiangyin, Jiangsu 214400, P.R. China, Department of Orthopedics, Qidong People's Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu 226200, P.R. China, Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China, Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210006, P.R. China
- Published online on: June 28, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6368
-
Pages:
1784-1789
-
Copyright: © Ren
et al. This is an open access article distributed under the
terms of Creative
Commons Attribution License.
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw osteosynthesis (MIPPSO) and traditional open pedicle screw osteosynthesis (TOPSO) in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebra fracture. A retrospective case-control study was conducted in 120 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures treated in the Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical School (Jiangyin, China) from January 2013 to September 2014. They were randomly divided into two groups: MIPPSO and TOPSO groups with 60 cases in each group. The operation time, blood loss, incision length, post-operative bed rest time, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores before and after operation were recorded and analyzed. Inflammatory indexes including serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK), the anterior vertebral height ratio and kyphosis Cobb's angle changes were also observed. The basic data of the two groups were similar, and there was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups. The perioperative blood loss, length of incision, bed rest time and total hospital stay in the minimally invasive group were less than those in the open group. Levels of post‑operative inflammation indicators such as CRP and CK were significantly higher than those of pre-operative (P<0.05), which was more obvious in the TOPSO group (P<0.05). VAS, ODI scores, anterior vertebral height and Cobb's angle were significantly improved at three days, one and 12 months after surgery compared with those before operation. MIPPSO for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures can achieve similar clinical effects with traditional incision surgery. In addition, it has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding and shorter post-operative bed rest time and hospital stay.
View References
1
|
Boelderl A, Daniaux H, Kathrein A and
Maurer H: Danger of damaging the medial branches of the posterior
rami of spinal nerves during a dorsomedian approach to the spine.
Clin Anat. 15:77–81. 2002. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Agrawal A, Mizuno J, Kato Y, Inoue T and
Sano H: Minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in a case of L4
fracture: Case report with review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg.
5:64–69. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Wiltse LL and Spencer CW: New uses and
refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine.
13:696–706. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ and Patterson J:
Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme
lateral interbody fusion: An analysis of 600 cases. Spine.
36:26–32. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Wang MY, Vasudevan R and Mindea SA:
Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of
rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without
supplemental pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 21:861–866.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Lowery GL and Kulkarni SS: Posterior
percutaneous spine instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 9 Suppl
1:S126–S130. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Magerl FP: Stabilization of the lower
thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 189:125–141. 1984.
|
8
|
Oh HS, Kim JS, Lee SH, Liu WC and Hong SW:
Comparison between the accuracy of percutaneous and open pedicle
screw fixations in lumbosacral fusion. Spine J. 13:1751–1757. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Prokop A, Lohlein F, Chmielnicki M and
Volbracht J: Minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation for
spine fractures. Unfallchirurg. 112:621–628. 2009.(In German).
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Schmidt OI, Strasser S, Kaufmann V,
Strasser E and Gahr RH: Role of early minimal-invasive spine
fixation in acute thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. Indian J
Orthop. 41:374–380. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Wang HW, Li CQ, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Wang J
and Chu TW: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation through the pedicle
of fractured vertebra in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar
fractures using Sextant system: An analysis of 38 cases. Chin J
Traumatol. 13:137–145. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Krüger A, Rammler K, Ziring E, Zettl R,
Ruchholtz S and Frangen TM: Percutaneous minimally invasive
instrumentation for traumatic thoracic and lumbar fractures: A
prospective analysis. Acta Orthop Belg. 78:376–381. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Kang H, Cai X, Xu F and Huang Y:
Effectiveness of combined treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis
with MED, Quadrant, and Sextant-R systems. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong
Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 27:399–403. 2013.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Sairyo K, Sakai T and Yasui N: Minimally
invasive technique for direct repair of pars interarticularis
defects in adults using a percutaneous pedicle screw and hook-rod
system. J Neurosurg Spine. 10:492–495. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|