Effects of SI and PCV on respiratory mechanics, early central drive and hemodynamics in patients with ARDS

Ji,Mingxia; Hong,Xiaofei; Chen,Mengyan; Chen,Tiejiang; Jia,Yi'an; Zhu,Jinjiang; Wu,Xionglin; Huang,Xiaoying; Zhang,Ning

doi:10.3892/etm.2019.7218

Effects of SI and PCV on respiratory mechanics, early central drive and hemodynamics in patients with ARDS

Authors:
- Mingxia Ji
- Xiaofei Hong
- Mengyan Chen
- Tiejiang Chen
- Yi'an Jia
- Jinjiang Zhu
- Xionglin Wu
- Xiaoying Huang
- Ning Zhang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Emergency, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, Zhejiang 320000, P.R. China, Department of Science and Education, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, Zhejiang 320000, P.R. China, Department of ICU, Lishui People's Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, P.R. China
Published online on: January 30, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7218
Pages: 2708-2714

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Effects of sustained inflation (SI) and pressure- controlled ventilation (PCV) on respiratory mechanics, early central drive, and hemodynamics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were investigated and compared. A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with ARDS, who were admitted to the Yiwu Central Hospital from March 2015 to March 2016, was performed. According to the ventilation method adopted by the patients with ARDS, 13 patients who received SI treatment were included in the SI group and 13 patients who received PCV treatment were included in the PCV group. The condition of central drive of the patients in the two groups was recorded and calculated continuously before and after recruitment maneuver (RM), the changes of each indicator of the respiratory function and hemodynamics were recorded and calculated before and after RM at 1, 10, 20 and 30 min. The differences were not statistically significant when comparing PIP, Pplate and Crs in patients in the SI group and the PCV group before RM with those after RM at 1, 10, 20 and 30 min (P>0.05), the differences were not statistically significant when comparing heart rate and mean arterial pressure in patients in the SI group and the PCV group before RM with those after RM at 1, 10, 20 and 30 min (P>0.05). Ηowever, central venous pressure in patients in the SI group after RM at 10 and 20 min was significantly higher than that in the PCV group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). VT/RMS, VE/RMS and ΔPdi/RMS in the SI group and the PCV group after RM were significantly higher than those before RM, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was little difference in the effect between SI and PCV on respiratory mechanics, early central drive and hemodynamics in patients with ARDS, and both mechanical ventilation methods enhanced the effect of central‑mechanical‑ventilation coupling after RM. Therefore, the two mechanical ventilation methods, SI and PCV, were equally available for patients with ARDS.

View Figures

View References

1	Papazian L, Calfee CS, Chiumello D, Luyt CE, Meyer NJ, Sekiguchi H, Matthay MA and Meduri GU: Diagnostic workup for ARDS patients. Intensive Care Med. 42:674–685. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Bein T, Grasso S, Moerer O, Quintel M, Guerin C, Deja M, Brondani A and Mehta S: The standard of care of patients with ARDS: Ventilatory settings and rescue therapies for refractory hypoxemia. Intensive Care Med. 42:699–711. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Duan EH, Adhikari NK, D'Aragon F, Cook DJ, Mehta S, Alhazzani W, Goligher E, Charbonney E, Arabi YM, Karachi T, et al: Management of ARDS and refractory hypoxemia: A multicenter observational study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 14:1818–1826. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Pipeling MR and Fan E: Therapies for refractory hypoxemia in acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 304:2521–2527. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Madotto F, Pham T, Bellani G, Bos LD, Simonis FD, Fan E, Artigas A, Brochard L, Schultz MJ and Laffey JG: LUNG SAFE Investigators the ESICM Trials Group. Resolved versus confirmed ARDS after 24 h: Insights from the LUNG SAFE study. Intensive Care Med. 44:564–577. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Marik PE and Long A: ARDS complicating pustular psoriasis: Treatment with low-dose corticosteroids, vitamin C and thiamine. BMJ Case Rep. Feb 2–2018.(Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-223475. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Ding LC, Liu XF, Chao HE, Zuo J, Wang S, Li W and Lin Z: Study of Shenfu injection on blood flow volume of lungs and breathing mechanics in ARDS. Zhongguo Zhong Yi Ji Ζheng. 5:774–775,792. 2010.(In Chinese).
8	Vieillard-Baron A, Matthay M, Teboul JL, Bein T, Schultz M, Magder S and Marini JJ: Experts' opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: Focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 42:739–749. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Zhu GF, Wang DJ, Liu S, Jia M and Jia SJ: Efficacy and safety of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure after cardiac surgery. Chin Med J (Engl). 126:4463–4469. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
10	Girard TD and Bernard GR: Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: A state-of-the-art review. Chest. 131:921–929. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Arnal JM, Paquet J, Wysocki M, Demory D, Donati S, Granier I, Corno G and Durand-Gasselin J: Optimal duration of a sustained inflation recruitment maneuver in ARDS patients. Intensive Care Med. 37:1588–1594. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Santos CL, Santos RS, Moraes L, Samary CS, Felix NS, Silva JD, Morales MM, Huhle R, Abreu MG, Schanaider A, et al: Effects of pressure support and pressure-controlled ventilation on lung damage in a model of mild extrapulmonary acute lung injury with intra-abdominal hypertension. PLoS One. 12:e01782072017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Sahetya SK, Goligher EC and Brower RG: Fifty years of research in ARDS. Setting positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 195:1429–1438. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Rozé H, Doassans G, Repusseau B and Ouattara A: Decrease of thoracopulmonary compliance with pressure assist controlled ventilation in ARDS patients under ECMO and transported to a referral centre. Intensive Care Med. 43:148–149. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Becher T, Rostalski P, Kott M, Adler A, Schädler D, Weiler N and Frerichs I: Global and regional assessment of sustained inflation pressure-volume curves in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Physiol Meas. 38:1132–1144. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Guérin C, Papazian L, Reignier J, Ayzac L, Loundou A and Forel JM: investigators of the Acurasys Proseva trials. Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 20:3842016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Takeuchi M and Tachibana K: Mechanical ventilation for ARDS patients - for a better understanding of the 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 15:41–45. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Aydın V, Kabukcu HK, Sahin N, Mesci A, Arici AG, Kahveci G and Ozmete O: Comparison of pressure and volume-controlled ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations. Clin Respir J. 10:342–349. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Davies SW, Leonard KL, Falls RK Jr, Mageau RP, Efird JT, Hollowell JP, Trainor WE 2nd, Kanaan HA, Hickner RC, et al: Lung protective ventilation (ARDSNet) versus airway pressure release ventilation: ventilatory management in a combined model of acute lung and brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 78:240–249. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Zhang JG, Chen XJ, Liu F, Zeng ZG and Qian KJ: Lung recruitment maneuver effects on respiratory mechanics and extravascular lung water index in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. World J Emerg Med. 2:201–205. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Parida S and Bidkar PU: Advanced pressure control modes of ventilation in cardiac surgery: Scanty evidence or unexplored terrain? Indian J Crit Care Med. 20:169–172. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Tugrul S, Akinci O, Ozcan PE, Ince S, Esen F, Telci L, Akpir K and Cakar N: Effects of sustained inflation and postinflation positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Focusing on pulmonary and extrapulmonary forms. Crit Care Med. 31:738–744. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Mauri T, Grasselli G, Suriano G, Eronia N, Spadaro S, Turrini C, Patroniti N, Bellani G and Pesenti A: Control of respiratory drive and effort in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients recovering from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 125:159–167. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI