Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1792-0981 Online ISSN: 1792-1015
Journal Cover
July-2019 Volume 18 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
July-2019 Volume 18 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article

Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review

  • Authors:
    • Lifu Li
    • Yinghua Ou
    • Hui Yue
    • Hong Sun
    • Peisheng Chen
    • Suying Liu
    • Fengjian He
    • Qianqian Peng
    • Sanhua Deng
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China
  • Pages: 154-162
    |
    Published online on: April 30, 2019
       https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7535
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

A colonoscopy is considered to be the standard diagnostic test used to detect early colorectal lesions. Detection rates are expected to improve with optimised visualisation. A systematic review and network meta‑analysis was conducted to evaluate detection efficiency in several colonoscopic modalities. Relevant articles were identified in searches of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. The modalities, comprising of standard‑definition white light (SDWL), high‑definition white light (HDWL), narrow‑band imaging (NBI), autofluorescence imaging (AFI), PENTAX image enhanced technology (i‑SCAN), Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE), dye‑based chromoendoscopy and novel image enhanced systems, including blue laser imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI), were compared to identify the most efficient modalities that could be used to detect colorectal lesions. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. As a result, 40 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, in the network meta‑analyses, NBI (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04‑1.58), FICE (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11‑1.77), chromoendoscopy (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22‑1.93) and AFI (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.07‑2.87) were significantly better compared with SDWL at identifying adenoma in patients, and chromoendoscopy also proved significantly superior to HDWL (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06‑1.60). In pairwise analyses, it was demonstrated that chromoendoscopy was significantly superior to HDWL at detecting the number of polyps (MD, ‑1.11; 95% CI, ‑1.46, ‑0.76) and flat lesions (MD, ‑0.30; 95% CI, ‑0.49, ‑0.10) per subject. Additionally, FICE detected a significantly greater number of subjects with polyps (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64‑0.96) and NBI was significantly better at detecting the number of subjects with flat lesions (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60‑0.99) compared with HDWL. Based on the meta‑analysis, NBI, FICE and AFI were significantly better compared with SDWL at detecting patients with adenoma. Additionally, chromoendoscopy was significantly better than SDWL and HDWL at detecting the number of colorectal adenoma, however additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
View Figures

Figure 1

View References

1 

Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Waxman I, Kessler WR, Imperiale TF, Li X and Rex DK: High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 105:1301–1307. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Muto T, Bussey HJ and Morson BC: The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 36:2251–2270. 1975. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al: Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 329:1977–1981. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kahi CJ, Imperiale TF, Juliar BE and Rex DK: Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 7:770–775; quiz 711. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, et al: Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 366:687–696. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Matsuda T, Ono A, Sekiguchi M, Fujii T and Saito Y: Advances in image enhancement in colonoscopy for detection of adenomas. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 14:305–314. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Jin XF, Chai TH, Shi JW, Yang XC and Sun QY: Meta-analysis for evaluating the accuracy of endoscopy with narrow band imaging in detecting colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 27:882–887. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Omata F, Ohde S, Deshpande GA, Kobayashi D, Masuda K and Fukui T: Image-enhanced, chromo, and cap-assisted colonoscopy for improving adenoma/neoplasia detection rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 49:222–237. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM and Kleijnen J: The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 3:252003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ and Ades AE: A generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. NICE DSU Technical Support Document. 2:2011.

11 

Sturtz S, Ligges U and Gelman A: R2WinBUGS: A package for running WinBUGS from R. J Stat Softw. 12:1–16. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Aminalai A, Rösch T, Aschenbeck J, Mayr M, Drossel R, Schröder A, Scheel M, Treytnar D, Gauger U, Stange G, et al: Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: A randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol. 105:2383–2388. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Bisschops R, Tejpar S, Willekens H, De Hertogh G and Van Cutsem E: Su1432 I-SCAN detects more polyps in lynch syndrome (HNPCC) patients: A prospective controlled randomized back-to-back study. Gastrointest Endosc. 75:AB3302012. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Boparai KS, van den Broek FJ, van Eeden S, Fockens P and Dekker E: Increased polyp detection using narrow band imaging compared with high resolution endoscopy in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. Endoscopy. 43:676–682. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Thapar CJ, Thomas HJ, Atkin WS, Cardwell CR and Williams CB: Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 56:333–338. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Cha JM, Lee JI, Joo KR, Jung SW and Shin HP: A prospective randomized study on computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of small colorectal adenomas. Dig Dis Sci. 55:2357–2364. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, Kang HY, Chung GE, Choi J, Kim YS, Park MJ and Kim JS: Comparison of detection and miss rates of narrow band imaging, flexible spectral imaging chromoendoscopy and white light at screening colonoscopy: A randomised controlled back-to-back study. Gut. 63:785–791. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC and Song IS: Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: A prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 72:136–142. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

East JE, Ignjatovic A, Suzuki N, Guenther T, Bassett P, Tekkis PP and Saunders BP: A randomized, controlled trial of narrow-band imaging vs. high-definition white light for adenoma detection in patients at high risk of adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 14:e771–e778. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, Guenther T, Tekkis PP and Saunders BP: A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 28:768–776. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Glenn T, Hoffman BJ, Romagnuolo J and Hawes RH: Does narrow band imaging (NBI) enhance colon polyp detection? Gastrointest Endosc. 61:AB2772005. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Gross SA, Buchner AM, Crook JE, Cangemi JR, Picco MF, Wolfsen HC, DeVault KR, Loeb DS, Raimondo M, Woodward TA and Wallace MB: A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection. Endoscopy. 43:1045–1051. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Helbig CD and Rex DK: Narrow band imaging (NBI) versus white-light (WL) for colon polyp detection using high definition (HD) colonoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 63:AB2132006. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Hong SN, Choe WH, Lee JH, Kim SI, Kim JH, Lee TY, Kim JH, Lee SY, Cheon YK, Sung IK, et al: Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 75:1011–1021.e2. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hüneburg R, Lammert F, Rabe C, Rahner N, Kahl P, Büttner R, Propping P, Sauerbruch T and Lamberti C: Chromocolonoscopy detects more adenomas than white light colonoscopy or narrow band imaging colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 41:316–322. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Slater R, Sanders DS and Brown S: Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: A randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut. 53:376–380. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Ikematsu H, Saito Y, Tanaka S, Uraoka T, Sano Y, Horimatsu T, Matsuda T, Oka S, Higashi R, Ishikawa H and Kaneko K: The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: A multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol. 47:1099–1107. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N, Kuramoto T, Kawakami K, Abe Y, Morita E, Toshina K, Hoshiro H, Egashira Y, et al: Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: A randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 43:45–50. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kaltenbach T, Friedland S and Soetikno R: A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut. 57:1406–1412. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Kiriyama S, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Saito Y and Kuwano H: Detectability of colon polyp using computed virtual chromoendoscopy with flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012:5963032012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kuiper T, van den Broek FJ, Naber AH, Van Soest EJ, Scholten P, Mallant-Hent RCh, van den Brande J, Jansen JM, van Oijen AH, Marsman WA, et al: Endoscopic trimodal imaging detects colonic neoplasia as well as standard video endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 140:1887–1894. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Lapalus MG, Helbert T, Napoleon B, Rey JF, Houcke P and Ponchon T; Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive, : Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate? Endoscopy. 38:444–448. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Le Rhun M, Coron E, Parlier D, Nguyen JM, Canard JM, Alamdari A, Sautereau D, Chaussade S and Galmiche JP: High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: A randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 4:349–354. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fu KI, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Shimoda T, Murakami Y, et al: Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate?-A pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 103:1926–1932. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Moriichi K, Fujiya M, Sato R, Watari J, Nomura Y, Nata T, Ueno N, Maeda S, Kashima S, Itabashi K, et al: Back-to-back comparison of auto-fluorescence imaging (AFI) versus high resolution white light colonoscopy for adenoma detection. BMC Gastroenterol. 12:752012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A, Meucci G, Mandelli G, Imperiali G, Spinzi G, Terreni N, Lenoci N and Terruzzi V: The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 7:1049–1054. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Pellisé M, Fernández-Esparrach G, Cárdenas A, Sendino O, Ricart E, Vaquero E, Gimeno-García AZ, de Miguel CR, Zabalza M, Ginès A, et al: Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: A randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 135:1062–1068. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C, Sackmann M, Schmidt KD, Gossner L, Schaab C, Frieling T, Medve M, Mayer G, et al: Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: A randomised multicentre trial. Gut. 58:73–78. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Ramsoekh D, Haringsma J, Poley JW, van Putten P, van Dekken H, Steyerberg EW, van Leerdam ME and Kuipers EJ: A back-to-back comparison of white light video endoscopy with autofluorescence endoscopy for adenoma detection in high-risk subjects. Gut. 59:785–793. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N, Bansal A, Singh V, Ansstas M, Jonnalagadda SS, Hovis CE, Gaddam S, Wani SB, et al: Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 74:593–602. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Rex DK and Helbig CC: High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology. 133:42–47. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Sansone S, Prisco A, Meucci C, Garofano ML and Cipolletta L: Trimodal endoscopic imaging for the detection and differentiation of colorectal adenomas: A prospective single-centre clinical evaluation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 27:331–336. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Sabbagh LC, Reveiz L, Aponte D and De Aguiar S: Narrow-band imaging does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of published studies. BMC Gastroenterol. 11:1002011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Stoffel EM, Turgeon DK, Stockwell DH, Normolle DP, Tuck MK, Marcon NE, Baron JA, Bresalier RS, Arber N, Ruffin MT, et al: Chromoendoscopy detects more adenomas than colonoscopy using intensive inspection without dye spraying. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 1:507–513. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Togashi K, Hewett DG, Radford-Smith GL, Francis L, Leggett BA and Appleyard MN: The use of indigocarmine spray increases the colonoscopic detection rate of adenomas. J Gastroenterol. 44:826–833. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Konstantinidis K, Vardas E, Karmiris K, Chroniaris N, Chlouverakis G and Paspatis GA: Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: A randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 12 (10 Online). e260–e266. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Van den Broek FJ, Fockens P, Van Eeden S, Kara MA, Hardwick JC, Reitsma JB and Dekker E: Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 7:288–295. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Park SY, Lee SK, Kim BC, Han J, Kim JH, Cheon JH, Kim TI and Kim WH: Efficacy of chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine for the detection of ascending colon and cecum lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol. 43:878–885. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, Mayr M, Aminalai A, Drossel R, Schröder A, Scheel M, Wiedenmann B and Rösch T: Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: A prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 136:410–416.e1; quiz 715. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, Abou-Rebyeh H, Schachschal G, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Khalifa AC, Setka E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B and Rösch T: A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: Does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 57:59–64. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Ikematsu H, Sakamoto T, Togashi K, Yoshida N, Hisabe T, Kiriyama S, Matsuda K, Hayashi Y, Matsuda T, Osera S, et al: Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a novel endoscopic system with blue laser imaging: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 86:386–394. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Suzuki T, Hara T, Kitagawa Y, Takashiro H, Nankinzan R, Sugita O and Yamaguchi T: Linked-color imaging improves endoscopic visibility of colorectal nongranular flat lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 86:692–697. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Dos Santos CE, Malaman D, Lopes CV, Pereira-Lima JC and Parada AA: Digital chromoendoscopy for diagnosis of diminutive colorectal lesions. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012:2795212012. View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Leung FW: PDR or ADR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 108:1000–1002. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Lau PC and Sung JJ: Flat adenoma in colon: Two decades of debate. J Dig Dis. 11:201–207. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

56 

Ogiso K, Yoshida N, Siah KT, Kitae H, Murakami T, Hirose R, Inada Y, Dohi O, Okayama T, Kamada K, et al: New-generation narrow band imaging improves visibility of polyps: A colonoscopy video evaluation study. J Gastroenterol. 51:883–890. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Li L, Ou Y, Yue H, Sun H, Chen P, Liu S, He F, Peng Q and Deng S: Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review. Exp Ther Med 18: 154-162, 2019.
APA
Li, L., Ou, Y., Yue, H., Sun, H., Chen, P., Liu, S. ... Deng, S. (2019). Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 18, 154-162. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7535
MLA
Li, L., Ou, Y., Yue, H., Sun, H., Chen, P., Liu, S., He, F., Peng, Q., Deng, S."Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 18.1 (2019): 154-162.
Chicago
Li, L., Ou, Y., Yue, H., Sun, H., Chen, P., Liu, S., He, F., Peng, Q., Deng, S."Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 18, no. 1 (2019): 154-162. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7535
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li L, Ou Y, Yue H, Sun H, Chen P, Liu S, He F, Peng Q and Deng S: Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review. Exp Ther Med 18: 154-162, 2019.
APA
Li, L., Ou, Y., Yue, H., Sun, H., Chen, P., Liu, S. ... Deng, S. (2019). Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 18, 154-162. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7535
MLA
Li, L., Ou, Y., Yue, H., Sun, H., Chen, P., Liu, S., He, F., Peng, Q., Deng, S."Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 18.1 (2019): 154-162.
Chicago
Li, L., Ou, Y., Yue, H., Sun, H., Chen, P., Liu, S., He, F., Peng, Q., Deng, S."Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta‑analysis and systematic review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 18, no. 1 (2019): 154-162. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7535
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team