|
1
|
Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E and Li TC:
Asherman syndrome - one century later. Fertil Steril. 89:759–779.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Kodaman PH and Arici A: Intra-uterine
adhesions and fertility outcome: How to optimize success? Curr Opin
Obstet Gynecol. 19:207–214. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Conforti A, Alviggi C, Mollo A, De Placido
G and Magos A: The management of Asherman syndrome: A review of
literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 11:1182013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Guo EJ, Chung JPW, Poon LCY and Li TC:
Reproductive outcomes after surgical treatment of asherman
syndrome: A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol.
Jan 3–2019.(Epub ahead of print). doi:
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.12.009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
The American Fertility Society
classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal
occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian
anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 49:944–955.
1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg
D, Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, Eestermans W and
Gerris J: Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards
single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 14:2345–2349. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Al-Inany H: Intrauterine adhesions. An
update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 80:986–993. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Deans R and Abbott J: Review of
intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 17:555–569. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Lim DR, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH and Kim NK:
Intrauterine contraceptive device-related actinomycosis infection
presenting as ovarian cancer with carcinomatosis. Surg Infect
(Larchmt). 15:826–828. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Panayotidis C, Weyers S, Bosteels J and
van Herendael B: Intrauterine adhesions (IUA): Has there been
progress in understanding and treatment over the last 20 years?
Gynecol Surg. 6:197–211. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G,
Scognamiglio M, O'Donovan P, Campo R and De Wilde RL: Prevention of
intrauterine post-surgical adhesions in hysteroscopy. A systematic
review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 203:182–192. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Shirasuna K and Iwata H: Effect of aging
on the female reproductive function. Contracept Reprod Med.
2:232017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Galey-Fontaine J, Cédrin-Durnerin I,
Chaïbi R, Massin N and Hugues JN: Age and ovarian reserve are
distinct predictive factors of cycle outcome in low responders.
Reprod Biomed Online. 10:94–99. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Jirge PR: Poor ovarian reserve. J Hum
Reprod Sci. 9:63–69. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Karande VC: Managing and predicting low
response to standard in vitro fertilization therapy: A review of
the options. Treat Endocrinol. 2:257–272. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Fernandez H, Al-Najjar F,
Chauveaud-Lambling A, Frydman R and Gervaise A: Fertility after
treatment of Asherman's syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol. 13:398–402. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Roudebush WE, Kivens WJ and Mattke JM:
Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve. Biomark Insights. 3:259–268. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Weall BM, Al-Samerria S, Conceicao J,
Yovich JL and Almahbobi G: A direct action for GH in improvement of
oocyte quality in poor-responder patients. Reproduction.
149:147–154. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Keane KN, Hinchliffe PM, Rowlands PK,
Borude G, Srinivasan S, Dhaliwal SS and Yovich JL: DHEA
Supplementation Confers No Additional Benefit to that of Growth
Hormone on Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in IVF Patients
Categorized as Poor Prognosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).
9:142018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Wu Y, Gao X, Lu X, Xi J, Jiang S, Sun Y
and Xi X: Endometrial thickness affects the outcome of in vitro
fertilization and embryo transfer in normal responders after GnRH
antagonist administration. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 12:962014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Zhao J, Zhang Q and Li Y: The effect of
endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on
pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol.
10:1002012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, Chen X, Shi XY,
Zheng HY and Ni YP: Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and
pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo
transfer: A retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol.
8:302010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Gonen Y and Casper RF: Prediction of
implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium
during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization
(IVF). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 7:146–152. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Shen MS, Wang CW, Chen CH and Tzeng CR:
New horizon on successful management for a woman with repeated
implantation failure due to unresponsive thin endometrium: Use of
extended estrogen supplementation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res.
39:1092–1094. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Acharya S, Yasmin E and Balen AH: The use
of a combination of pentoxifylline and tocopherol in women with a
thin endometrium undergoing assisted conception therapies--a report
of 20 cases. Hum Fertil (Camb). 12:198–203. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Barad DH, Kushnir VA, Shohat-Tal A,
Lazzaroni E, Lee HJ and Gleicher N: Prospective randomized study of
endometrial perfusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
(G-CSF) in unselected IVF cycles: Impact on endometrial thickness
and clinical pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 100:S1442013.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Huang Z, Li S, Ma Q, et al: The influence
of transferred embryo's number on pregnancy outcomes in aged
infertile patients undergoing IVF-ET*. Progr Mod Biomed. 9:835–837.
2009.
|
|
28
|
Luo Y, Liu F, Yi Y, et al: Effect of
number and quality of embryo transferred on clinical pregnancy rate
in women of different age. J Reprod Med. 23:361–366. 2014.
|
|
29
|
Lukassen HG, Braat DD, Wetzels AM,
Zielhuis GA, Adang EM, Scheenjes E and Kremer JA: Two cycles with
single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo
transfer: A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 20:702–708.
2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
