|
1
|
Haemmerli J, Lenga P, Hong B, Kursumovic
A, Maldaner N, Burkhardt JK, Bijlenga P, Rüfenacht DA, Schmidt NO,
Vajkoczy P and Dengler J: Clinical implications and radiographic
characteristics of the relation between giant intracranial
aneurysms of the posterior circulation and the brainstem. Acta
Neurochir (Wien). 161:1747–1753. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Luzzi S, Gallieni M, Del Maestro M,
Trovarelli D, Ricci A and Galzio R: Giant and very large
intracranial aneurysms: Surgical strategies and special issues.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 129:25–31. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Chen J, Zhang C, Li P, Chen L and Wang Y:
High-flow extracranial-intracranial bypass for giant cavernous
carotid aneurysm. J Craniofac Surg. 29:1042–1046. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Ota N, Matsukawa H, Noda K, Sato H, Hatano
Y, Hashimoto A, Miyazaki T, Kondo T, Kinoshita Y, Saito N, et al:
Evaluation of microsurgery for managing giant or complex cerebral
aneurysms: A retrospective study. World Neusurg. 115:e190–e199.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Griessenauer CJ, Ogilvy CS, Adeeb N,
Dmytriw AA, Foreman PM, Shallwani H, Limbucci N, Mangiaflco S,
Kumar A, Michelozzi C, et al: Pipeline embolization of posterior
circulation aneurysms: A multicenter study of 131 aneurysms. J
Neurosurg. 130:923–935. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Walcott BP, Stapleton CJ, Choudhri O and
Patel AB: Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial
aneurysms. JAMA Neurol. 73:1002–1008. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Ye G, Zhang M, Deng L, Chen X and Wang Y:
Meta-analysis of the efficiency and prognosis of intracranial
aneurysm treated with flow diverter devices. J Mol Neurosci.
59:158–167. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith
TL, Sharma AK and Watkins CL: Reliability of measurements of muscle
tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 29:223–228.
2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos
SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, Lamoureux J, Chagnon M and Roy D:
Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular
treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 34:1398–1403.
2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Wu MC, Chang YC, Wang TG and Lin LC:
Evaluating swallowing dysfunction using a 100-ml water swallowing
test. Dysphagia. 19:43–47. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC,
Schouten HJ and van Gijn J: Interobserver agreement for the
assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 19:604–607.
1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J III,
Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, Forbes GS, Thielen K, Nichols
D, O'Fallon WM, et al: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Natural
history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular
treatment. Lancet. 362:103–110. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Graziano F, Ganau M, Iacopino DG and
Boccardi E: Vertebro-basilar junction aneurysms: A single centre
experience and meta-analysis of endovascular treatments.
Neuroradiol J. 27:732–741. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Liang F, Zhang Y, Yan P, Ma C, Liang S,
Jiang P and Jiang C: Predictors of periprocedural complications and
angiographic outcomes of endovascular therapy for large and giant
intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms. World Neurosurg.
125:e378–e384. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Jing L, Zhong J, Liu J, Yang X, Paliwal N,
Meng H, Wang S and Zhang Y: Hemodynamic effect of flow diverter and
coils in treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms. World
Neurosurg. 89:199–207. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Xiang J, Damiano RJ, Lin N, Snyder KV,
Siddiqui AH, Levy EI and Meng H: High-fidelity virtual stenting:
Modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic
characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg.
123:832–840. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, Pruvo
JP, Bruneau M, De Witte O and Leclerc X: Flow-diverter stent for
the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective
study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 41:2247–2253.
2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN
and Levy EI: Complications after treatment with pipeline
embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or
without coil embolization. Neurosurgery. 71:E509–E513.
2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Lin LM, Colby GP, Kim JE, Huang J, Tamargo
RJ and Coon AL: Immediate and follow-up results for 44 consecutive
cases of small (<10 mm) internal carotid artery aneurysms
treated with the pipeline embolization device. Surg Neurol Int.
4(114)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Peschillo S, Caporlingua A, Resta MC,
Peluso JPP, Burdi N, Sourour N, Diana F, Guidetti G, Clarençon F,
Bloemsma GC, et al: Endovascular treatment of large and giant
carotid aneurysms with flow-diverter stents alone or in combination
with coils: A multicenter experience and long-term follow-up. Oper
Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 13:492–502. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Ikeda H, Lshii A, Kikuchi T, Ando M,
Chihara H, Arai D, Hattori E and Miyamoto S: Delayed aneurysm
rupture due to residual blood flow at the inflow zone of the
intracranial paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm treated with the
pipeline embolization device: Histopathological investigation.
Interv Neuroradiol. 21:674–683. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
