Inhalation of low-dose desflurane prevents the hemodynamic instability caused by target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Zhao,Peng; Cui,Yunfeng; Sun,Lihua; Sun,Xufang

doi:10.3892/etm.2020.9486

Inhalation of low-dose desflurane prevents the hemodynamic instability caused by target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Authors:
- Peng Zhao
- Yunfeng Cui
- Lihua Sun
- Xufang Sun
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130041, P.R. China
Published online on: November 19, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9486
Article Number: 54
Copyright: © Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether the addition of inhaled desflurane is superior to remifentanil-propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. A total of 60 patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynecological surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated to receive either propofol-remifentanil (PR group; n=30) or combined propofol-remifentanil and low-dose desflurane (PRD group; n=30) for the maintenance of anesthesia. Hemodynamics [mean arterial pressure (MAP); heart rate (HR)], recovery parameters and complications were recorded. The results of the present study indicated that the addition of desflurane significantly reduced the amount of propofol and remifentanil that was administered in the PRD group, compared with that in the PR group. MAP and HR were significantly higher at T3 (5 min post-pneumoperitoneum), but significantly lower at T4 (removal of pneumoperitoneum needle) and T5 (post-operation immediately) in the PR group, compared with the PRD group. Moreover, MAP and HR were significantly altered at multiple time points within the PR group; however, they were relatively stable in the PRD group. There were no significant differences in the recovery parameters and complications between the two groups. In conclusion, combining low-dose desflurane with PR may represent an efficient anesthesia regimen to prevent the hemodynamic instability of TIVA in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

View Figures

View References

1	Koo YJ, Kim JE, Kim YH, Hahn HS, Lee IH, Kim TJ, Lee KH, Shim JU and Lim KT: Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: Surgical and oncological outcomes. J Gynecol Oncol. 25:111–117. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Zhang D and Nie A: Assessment of different anesthesia depth under total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative cognitive function in laparoscopic patients. J Res Med Sci. 21(73)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
3	Carli D, Meletti JFA, Neto NEU, Martinez G, Kim ALC and de Camargo RPS: General anesthesia technique and perception of quality of postoperative recovery in women undergoing cholecystectomy: A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. PLoS One. 15(e0228805)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Lee WK, Kim MS, Kang SW, Kim S and Lee JR: Type of anaesthesia and patient quality of recovery: A randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anaesthesia with desflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 114:663–668. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Ryu JH, Kim JH, Park KS and Do SH: Remifentanil-propofol versus fentanyl-propofol for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy. J Clin Anesth. 20:328–332. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Yoo YC, Bai SJ, Lee KY, Shin S, Choi EK and Lee JW: Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Yonsei Med J. 53:1197–1202. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Son I, Oh CS, Choi JW and Kim SH: The effect of sufentanil administration on remifentanil-based anaesthesia during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014(701329)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Beier SL, Mattoso CR, Aguiar AJ, Vianna PT and Massone F: Hemodynamic effects of target-controlled infusion of propofol alone or in combination with a constant-rate infusion of remifentanil in dogs. Can J Vet Res. 79:309–315. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
9	Herling SF, Dreijer B, Wrist Lam G, Thomsen T and Møller AM: Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4(CD011387)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Bharti N, Chari P and Kumar P: Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol-based anesthesia on the hemodynamic response and recovery characteristics in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 6:380–384. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Ionescu D, Mărgărit S, Vlad L, Iancu C, Alexe A, Deac D, Răduţ A, Tudorică G, Necula A and Pop T: TIVA-TCI (Total IntraVenous Anesthesia-Target Controlled Infusion) versus isoflurane anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction. Chirurgia (Bucur). 104:167–172. 2009.PubMed/NCBI(In Romanian).
12	Yasuda N, Eger EI II, Weiskopf RB, Tanifuji Y and Kobayashi K: Solubility of desflurane (I-653), sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in human blood. Masui. 40:1059–1062. 1991.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).
13	Eger EI II: New inhaled anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 80:906–922. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Jindal R, Kumra VP, Narani KK and Sood J: Comparison of maintenance and emergence characteristics after desflurane or sevoflurane in outpatient anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 55:36–42. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Kotwani MB and Malde AD: Comparison of maintenance, emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and desflurane in pediatric ambulatory surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 33:503–508. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Boat A, Mahmoud M, Michelfelder EC, Lin E, Ngamprasertwong P, Schnell B, Kurth CD, Crombleholme TM and Sadhasivam S: Supplementing desflurane with intravenous anesthesia reduces fetal cardiac dysfunction during open fetal surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 20:748–756. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Daabiss M: American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth. 55:111–115. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Bredy C, Ministeri M, Kempny A, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Swan L, Uebing A, Diller GP, Gatzoulis MA and Dimopoulos K: New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification in adults with congenital heart disease: Relation to objective measures of exercise and outcome. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 4:51–58. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Ead H: From Aldrete to PADSS: Reviewing discharge criteria after ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 21:259–267. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM and Siegel JL: Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 10:244–251. 1990.PubMed/NCBI
21	Namigar T, Serap K, Esra AT, Özgül O, Can ÖA, Aysel A and Achmet A: The correlation among the Ramsey sedation scale, Richmond agitation sedation scale and Riker sedation agitation scale during midazolam-remifantanil sedation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 67:347–354. 2016.
22	Langley GB and Sheppeard H: The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int. 5:145–148. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Cho YJ, Bae J, Kim TK, Hong DM, Seo JH, Bahk JH and Jeon Y: Microcirculation measured by vascular occlusion test during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia is superior to that in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized study. J Clin Monit Comput. 31:989–997. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
24	Mahli A, Coskun D, Karaca GI, Akcali DT, Karabiyik L and Karadenizli Y: Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil with propofol or desflurane under bispectral index guidance: Quality of anesthesia and recovery profile. J Res Med Sci. 16:611–620. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
25	Zaballos M, Reyes A, Etulain J, Monteserín C, Rodríguez M and Velasco E: Desflurane versus propofol in post-operative quality of recovery of patients undergoing day laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prospective, comparative, non-inferiority study. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 65:96–102. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Spanish).
26	Gritti P, Carrara B, Khotcholava M, Bortolotti G, Giardini D, Lanterna LA, Benigni A and Sonzogni V: The use of desflurane or propofol in combination with remifentanil in myasthenic patients undergoing a video-assisted thoracoscopic-extended thymectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 53:380–389. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
27	Gozdemir M, Sert H, Yilmaz N, Kanbak O, Usta B and Demircioglu RI: Remifentanil-propofol in vertebral disk operations: Hemodynamics and recovery versus desflurane-n(2)o inhalation anesthesia. Adv Ther. 24:622–631. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
28	Chen PN, Lu IC, Chen HM, Cheng KI, Tseng KY and Lee KT: Desflurane reinforces the efficacy of propofol target-controlled infusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 32:32–37. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
29	Lin CY, Wong CS and Wu CT: Cost analysis of three anesthetic regimens under auditory evoked potential monitoring in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 46:53–54. 2008.PubMed/NCBI
30	Demeere JL, Merckx Ch and Demeere N: Cost minimisation and cost effectiveness in anaesthesia for total hip replacement surgery, in Belgium? A study comparing three general anaesthesia techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 57:145–151. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
31	Seki H, Furumoto K, Sato M, Kagoya A, Hashimoto H, Sekiguchi Y and Nakatsuka I: Effects of epidural anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 32:608–615. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
32	Uchinami Y, Takikawa S, Takashima F, Maeda Y, Nasu S, Ito A and Saito T: Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting is not increased by combination of low concentration sevoflurane and propofol compared with propofol alone in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. JA Clin Rep. 5(70)2019.PubMed/NCBIDOI: 10.1186/s40981-019-0292-4.
33	Marana E, Russo A, Colicci S, Polidori L, Bevilacqua F, Viviani D and Di Stasio E: Desflurane versus sevoflurane: a comparison on stress response. Minerva anestesiologica. 79:7–14. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
34	Roh GU, Song Y, Park J, Ki YM and Han DW: Effects of propofol on the inflammatory response during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study. Sci Rep. 9(5242)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar