Preclinical study analysis of massive magnesium alloy graft for calcaneal fractures

Dragosloveanu,Şerban; Cotor,Dragoş Corneliu; Dragosloveanu,Christiana D.M.; Stoian,Cătălin; Stoica,Cristian Ioan

doi:10.3892/etm.2021.10163

Preclinical study analysis of massive magnesium alloy graft for calcaneal fractures

Authors:
- Şerban Dragosloveanu
- Dragoş Corneliu Cotor
- Christiana D.M. Dragosloveanu
- Cătălin Stoian
- Cristian Ioan Stoica
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Orthopedics, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania, Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
Published online on: May 7, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10163
Article Number: 731
Copyright: © Dragosloveanu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The highly comminuted calcaneal fractures represent a challenge for surgeons and require bone grafts for a good clinical outcome. Postoperative results are generally associated with increased morbidity and long periods of inactivity. The biomedical community promotes the use of artificial materials for grafts in order to achieve improved results. In an era when cosmetic concerns as well as the satisfaction of patients are mandatory and the use of autologous bone grafts is not without complications, an artificial replacement appears to be a favorable option. Synthetic bone grafts are known to fail under stress shield or are associated with systemic side effects. The purpose of the present study was to investigate and determine an already commercially available magnesium (Mg) alloy whose design is most suitable for long‑term use. The mechanical properties of Mg1Ca and MgYREZr compared with normal cortical and cancellous bone were assessed. Another discussed aspect was the influence of the alloy in the graft fixation. The results revealed that Mg1Ca and MgYREZr alloys had a low tensile strength of 75 and 250 MPa, respectively. For this reason, it was surmised that MgYREZr alloy could be an optimal choice with favorable corrosion resistance. Since calcaneal fractures are prone to skin necrosis and septic complications, the need for antibacterial procedures and antibiotic prophylaxis is highlighted. Thus, an in vivo attempt was also made to identify the relationship between Mg alloy products and bacterial load. However, the most important feature of the present study was the creation of a 3D model grafting, with an anti‑sliding design, which can be potentially used with the preferred Mg alloy in this type of fractures. In conclusion, artificial materials are the future in medicine, replacing the body‑limiting capabilities of grafts. They are safe and incur less comorbidities. This method could pave the way for reducing patient discomfort and increasing patient satisfaction. Although further testing is required, this research represents a great starting point for calcaneal fractures.

View Figures

View References

1	Schepers T, van Lieshout EM, van Ginhoven TM, Heetveld MJ and Patka P: Current concepts in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Results of a nationwide survey. Int Orthop. 32:711–715. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Atkins RM, Allen PE and Livingstone JA: Demographic features of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. Foot Ankle Surg. 7:77–84. 2001.
3	Soeur R and Remy R: Fractures of the calcaneus with displacement of the thalamic portion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 57:413–421. 1975.PubMed/NCBI
4	Slatis P, Kiviluoto O, Santavirta S and Laasonen EM: Fractures of the calcaneum. J Trauma. 19:939–943. 1979.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Buckley R, Tough S, McCormack R, Pate G, Leighton R, Petrie D and Galpin R: Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84:1733–1744. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Essex-Lopresti P: The mechanism, reduction technique, and results in fractures of the os calcis. Br J Surg. 39:395–419. 1952.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Rak V, Ira D and Masek M: Operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures with calcaneal plates and its complications. Indian J Orthop. 43:271–280. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Bajammal S, Tornetta P III, Sanders D and Bhandari M: Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 19:360–364. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
9	Brauer CA, Manns BJ, Ko M, Donaldson C and Buckley R: An economic evaluation of operative compared with nonoperative management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87:2741–2749. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Pozo JL, Kirwan EO and Jackson AM: The long-term results of conservative management of severely displaced fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 66:386–390. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Stark JG: Use of selective estrogen receptor modulator for joint fusion and other healing of connective tissue. US Patent 8,501,690 B2, Filed April 30, 2010; issued August 6, 2013.
12	Liu C, Wan P, Tan LL, Wang K and Yang K: Preclinical investigation of an innovative magnesium-based bone graft substitute for potential orthopaedic applications. J Orthop Translat. 2:139–148. 2014.
13	Calori GM, Mazza E, Colombo M and Ripamonti C: The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: Any specific needs? Injury. 42 (Suppl 2):S56–S63. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Van der Stok J, Van Lieshout EM, El-Massoudi Y, Van Kralingen GH and Patka P: Bone substitutes in the Netherlands-a systematic literature review. Acta Biomater. 7:739–750. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Almaiman M, Al-Bargi HH and Manson P: Complication of anterior iliac bone graft harvesting in 372 adult patients from May 2006 to May 2011 and a literature review. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 6:257–266. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Böstman O and Pihlajamäki H: Clinical biocompatibility of biodegradable orthopaedic implants for internal fixation: A review. Biomaterials. 21:2615–2621. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Auer JA, Rechenberg BV, Bohner M and Hofmann-Amtenbrink M: Bone grafts and bone replacements. Equine Surg. 2012:1081–1096. 2012.
18	Dias AG, Lopes MA, Gibson IR and Santos JD: In vitro degradation studies of calcium phosphate glass ceramics prepared by controlled crystallization. J Non Cryst Solids. 330:81–89. 2003.
19	Kim HM: Ceramic bioactivity and related biomimetic strategy. Curr Opin Solid State Materials Sci. 7:289–299. 2003.
20	Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H and Tsiridis E: Bone substitutes: An update. Injury. 36 (Suppl 3):S20–S27. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	Waizy H, Seitz JM, Reifenrath J, Weizbauer A, Bach FW, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Denkena B and Windhagen H: Biodegradable magnesium implants for orthopedic applications. J Mater Sci. 48:39–50. 2013.
22	Seal CK, Vince K and Hodgson MA: Biodegradable surgical implants based on magnesium alloys-A review of current research. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng: 4, 2009.
23	Su Y, Chen W, Zhang T, Wu X, Wu Z and Zhang Y: Bohler's angle's role in assessing the injury severity and functional outcome of internal fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A retrospective study. BMC Surg. 13(40)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
24	Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T and Walling A: Operative treatment in 120 displaced in-traarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed Tomogra-phy scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 290:87–95. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
25	Kuhlmann J, Bartsch I, Willbold E, Schuchardt S, Holz O, Hort N, Höche D, Heineman WR and Witte F: Fast escape of hydrogen from gas cavities around corroding magnesium implants. Acta Biomaterialia. 9:8714–8721. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
26	Lukyanova E, Yu N, Yu AN, Martynenko AN, Martynenko N and Estrin Y: Features of in vitro and in vivo behaviour of magnesium alloy WE43. Materials Lett. 215:308–311. 2018.
27	Xiaoting S, Yuanyuan Z, Shufang Z, Rongfang Z, Rongfa Z, Chen L and Yijia Z: Characteristics of selenium-containing coatings on WE43 magnesium alloy by micro-arc oxidation. Mater Lett. 261(126944)2020.
28	Rahim MI, Ullah S and Mueller PP: Advances and challenges of biodegradable implant materials with a focus on magnesium-alloys and bacterial infections. Metals. 8(532)2018.
29	Ding Y, Wen C, Hodgson P and Li Y: Effects of alloying elements on the corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of biodegradable magnesium alloys: A review. J Mater Chem B. 2:1912–1933. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
30	Wang H and Shi Z: In vitro biodegradation behavior of magnesium and magnesium alloy. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 98:203–209. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
31	Song Y, Shan D, Chen R, Zhang F and Han EH: Biodegradable behaviors of AZ31 magnesium alloy in simulated body fluid. Mater Sci Eng C. 29:1039–1045. 2009.
32	Yan T, Tan L, Xiong D, Liu X, Zhang B and Yang K: Fluoride treatment and in vitro corrosion behavior of an AZ31B magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng C. 30:740–748. 2010.
33	Witte F, Fischer J, Nellesen J, Crostack HA, Kaese V, Pisch A, Beckmann F and Windhagen H: In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys. Biomaterials. 27:1013–1018. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
34	Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, Switzer E, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wirth CJ and Windhagen H: In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials. 26:3557–3563. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
35	Tan L, Yu X, Wan P and Yang K: Biodegradable materials for bone repairs: A review. J Mater Sci Technol. 29:503–513. 2013.
36	Hong D, Saha P, Chou DT, Lee B, Collins BE, Tan Z, Dong Z and Kumta PN: In vitro degradation and cytotoxicity response of Mg-4% Zn-0.5% Zr (ZK40) alloy as a potential biodegradable material. Acta Biomater. 9:8534–8547. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
37	Gu XN, Li N, Zheng YF and Ruan L: In vitro degradation performance and biological response of a Mg-Zn-Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng B. 176:1778–1784. 2011.
38	Li Z, Gu X, Lou S and Zheng Y: The development of binary Mg-Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone. Biomaterials. 29:1329–1344. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
39	Zhao C, Pan F, Zhang L, Pan H, Song K and Tang A: Microstructure, mechanical properties, bio-corrosion properties and cytotoxicity of as-extruded Mg-Sr alloys. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 70:1081–1088. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
40	Kannan MB: Influence of microstructure on the in-vitro degradation behaviour of magnesium alloys. Mater Lett. 64:739–742. 2010.
41	Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhao C, Li J, Song Y, Xie C, Tao H, Zhang Y, He Y, Jiang Y and Bian Y: Research on an Mg-Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial. Acta Biomater. 6:626–640. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
42	Liu C, He P, Wan P, Li M, Wang K, Tan L, Zhang Y and Yang K: The in vitro biocompatibility and macrophage phagocytosis of Mg17Al12 phase in Mg-Al-Zn alloys. J Biomed Mater Res A. 103:2405–2415. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
43	Gao L, Chen RS and Han EH: Solid solution strengthening behaviors in binary Mg-Y single phase alloys. J Alloys Compd. 472:234–240. 2009.
44	Yang H, Liu C, Wan P, Tan L and Yang K: Study of second phase in bioabsorbable magnesium alloys: Phase stability evaluation via Dmol³ calculation. APL Materials: Nov 8, 2013 (Epub ahead of print) doi: org/10.1063/1.4828935.
45	Zhang X, Zhang K, Li X, Deng X, LI Y, Ma M and Shi Y: Effect of solid-solution treatment on corrosion and electrochemical behaviors of Mg-15Y alloy in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. J Rare Earths. 30:1158–1167. 2012.
46	Südholz AD, Kirkland NT, Buchheit RG and Birbilis N: Electrochemical properties of intermetallic phases and common impurity elements in magnesium alloys. Electrochem Solid St Lett. 14(C57)2011.
47	Hofstetter J, Martinelli E, Pogatscher S, Schmutz P, Povoden-Karadeniz E, Weinberg AM, Uggowitzer PJ and Löffler JF: Influence of trace impurities on the in vitro and in vivo degradation of biodegradable Mg-5Zn-0.3Ca alloys. Acta Biomater. 23:347–353. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
48	Crawford T, Rodvold KA and Solomkin JS: Vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis? Clin Infect Dis. 54:1474–1479. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
49	Chen L, Peng W, Li LT, Kehong W and Ke Y: Preclinical investigation of an innovative magnesium-based bone graft substitute for potential orthopaedic applications. J Orthop Translat. 2:139–148. 2014.
50	Sommar P, Granberg Y, Halle M, Skogh AC, Lundgren KT and Jansson KÅ: Effects of a formalized collaboration between plastic and orthopedic surgeons in severe extremity trauma patients; a retrospective study. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 9(3)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
51	Buch BD, Myerson MS and Miller SD: Primary subtalar arthrodesis for the treatment of comminuted calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 17:61–70. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar