Vaginal birth after Cesarean experience in Romania: A retrospective case‑series study and online survey

Carauleanu,Alexandru; Tanasa,Ingrid Andrada; Nemescu,Dragos; Haba,Raluca; Socolov,Demetra

doi:10.3892/etm.2021.10326

Vaginal birth after Cesarean experience in Romania: A retrospective case‑series study and online survey

Authors:
- Alexandru Carauleanu
- Ingrid Andrada Tanasa
- Dragos Nemescu
- Raluca Haba
- Demetra Socolov
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ‘Grigore T. Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
Published online on: June 18, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10326
Article Number: 894
Copyright: © Carauleanu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The high Romanian Cesarean delivery rates have led to an increase in a women's desire to achieve vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery (VBAC), but certain impediments make this process difficult. We retrospectively evaluated the VBAC cases in a tertiary maternity hospital from Romania, and assessed the Romanian women's opinion about VBAC using a questionnaire that was distributed to three specific Facebook groups. We evaluated 63 patients who achieved VBAC between January 2014 and August 2020. In addition, an online survey with 41 open and closed questions assessed the participants' opinion regarding VBAC in Romania. The results are summarized and discussed. The results revealed that VBAC rates were under 1%. The main observed complications that followed VBAC were postpartum hemorrhage (15.8%), and uterine atony (7.93%), while the most frequent types of lesions encountered after VBAC were cervical tear (12.6%), followed by labial fissure (9.5%) and vaginal tear (7.9%). The patient's confidence in the health care system is low, and many women decide to try TOLAC at home. In conclusion, VBAC is an important topic in the context of high Romanian Cesarean rates, and the decision factors must provide consistent strategies that promote this mode of delivery.

View Figures

View References

1	Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, Bernloehr A, van Limbeek E, Lalor J and Begley C: Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 15(16)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	EURO-PERISTAT Project with SCPE and EUROCAT: European Perinatal Health Report. The health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. www.europeristat.com. Accessed 27 May, 2013 Accessed September 18, 2020.
3	Osterman MJK: Recent trends in vafginal birth after cesarean delivery: United States, 2016-2018. NCHS Data Brief, No. 359, March 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db359-h.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2020.
4	Attanasio LB, Kozhimannil KB and Kjerulff KH: Women's preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean. Birth. 46:51–60. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Ryan G, O Doherty KC, Devane D, McAuliffe F and Morrison J: Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth. BMJ Open. 9(031766)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Bonzon M, Gross MM, Karch A and Grylka-Baeschlin S: Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section-an online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland. Midwifery. 50:219–227. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Lundgren I, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K and Nilsson C: Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): A qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 15(196)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Cox KJ: Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 11(72)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Bailit JL, Dooley SL and Peaceman AN: Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates. Obstet Gynecol. 93:1025–1030. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	MacDorman MF, Menacker F and Declercq E: Cesarean birth in the United States: Epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 35:293–307, v. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	DeFranco EA, Rampersad R, Atkins KL, Odibo AO, Stevens EJ, Peipert JF, Stamilio DM and Macones GA: Do vaginal birth after cesarean outcomes differ based on hospital setting? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 197:400.e1–e6. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	Tandon AN and Dalal ARA: A randomized, open-labelled, interventional study to evaluate the incidence of infection with or without use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients of episiotomy in a normal vaginal delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 68:294–299. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Nalbanski A: Prophylactic episiotomy-a historical heritage with no medical foundation? Akush Ginekol (Sofia). 48:36–38. 2009.PubMed/NCBI(In Bulgarian).
14	Steiner N, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R and Sheiner E: Episiotomy: The final cut? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 286:1369–1373. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Mirteymouri M, Ayati S, Pourali L and Mahmoodinia M and Mahmoodinia M: Evaluation of maternal-neonatal outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery referred to maternity of academic hospitals. J Family Reprod Health. 10:206–210. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
16	Pont S, Austin K, Ibiebele I, Torvaldsen S, Patterson J and Ford J: Blood transfusion following intended vaginal birth after cesarean vs. elective repeat cesarean section in women with a prior primary cesarean: A population-based record linkage study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 98:382–389. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	ACOG practice bulletin No. 205. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 133:e110–e127. 2019.
18	Nettle JAS, Mcnamara HC and Du Plessis JM: Perineal trauma with vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 59:346–350. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Colais P, Bontempi K, Pinnarelli L, Piscicelli C, Mappa I, Fusco D and Davoli M: Vaginal birth after caesarean birth in Italy: Variations among areas of residence and hospitals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 18(383)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Ying YH, Linn G and Chang K: Vaginal birth after cesarean section in Taiwan: A population-based study. J Clin Med. 8(1203)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	Kollmann M, Gaulhofer J, Lang U and Klaritsch P: Placenta praevia: Incidence, risk factors and outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 29:1395–1398. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
22	Cresswell JA, Ronsmans C, Calvert C and Filippi V: Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 18:712–724. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB and Guise JM: Delivery after prior cesarean: Maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol. 38:297–309. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
24	Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK and Ellervik C: Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 19(360)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
25	Rowe R, Li Y, Knight M, Brocklehurst P and Hollowell J: Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home in England: Secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG. 123:1123–1132. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
26	Macdorman MF, Declercq E, Mathews TJ and Stotland N: Trends and characteristics of home vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the United States and selected States. Obstet Gynecol. 119:737–744. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar