|
1
|
Merz E: Three-dimensional transvaginal
ultrasound in gynecological diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
14:81–86. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Turcan N, Bohiltea RE, Ionita-Radu F,
Furtunescu F, Navolan D, Berceanu C, Nemescu D and Cirstoiu MM:
Unfavorable influence of prematurity on the neonatal prognostic of
small for gestational age fetuses. Exp Ther Med. 20:2415–2422.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Bohiltea R, Furtunescu F, Turcan N,
Navolan D, Ducu I and Cirstoiu M: Prematurity and intrauterine
growth restriction: Comparative analysis of incidence and
short-term complication. In: Proceedings of SOGR 2018. The 17
National Congress of the Romanian Society of Obstetrics and
Gynecology. 2018:708–712. 2019.
|
|
4
|
Abuhamad AZ, Singleton S, Zhao Y and Bocca
S: The Z technique: An easy approach to the display of the
mid-coronal plane of the uterus in volume sonography. J Ultrasound
Med. 25:607–612. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Bermejo C, Martínez-Ten P, Ruíz-López L,
Estévez M and Gil MM: Classification of uterine anomalies by
3-dimensional ultrasonography using ESHRE/ESGE criteria:
Interobserver variability. Reprod Sci. 25:740–747. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux
E, Natucci M and Campbell S: Three-dimensional ultrasound for the
assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital
anomalies: A comparison with hysterosalpingography and
two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 5:233–237.
1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L and
Jurkovic D: Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound
diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 21:578–582. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Moini A, Mohammadi S, Hosseini R, Eslami B
and Ahmadi F: Accuracy of 3-dimensional sonography for diagnosis
and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. J Ultrasound
Med. 32:923–927. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Mohamed M, Momtaz MD, Alaa N, Ebrashy MD,
Ayman A and Marzouk MD: Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the
evaluation of the uterine cavity. MEFSJ. 12:41–46. 2007.
|
|
10
|
Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, Perrone AM,
Savelli L, Giunchi S, Meriggiola MC, Gubbini G, Pilu G, Pelusi C
and Pelusi G: Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis
and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril.
92:808–813. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne
JL, Úbeda B, Rodríguez I and Pedrero C: Accuracy of
three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance
imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE
consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the
female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 46:616–622.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Bermejo C, Martinez Ten P, Cantarero R,
Diaz D, Perez Pedregosa JP, Barrón E, Labrador E and López LR:
Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct
anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 35:593–601. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Hösli I, Holzgreve W and Tercanli S: Use
of 3-dimensional ultrasound for assessment of intrauterine device
position. Ultraschall Med. 22:75–80. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In German).
|
|
14
|
Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD and Bromley B:
Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located
intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic
pain and abnormal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34:110–115.
2009.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Kalmantis K, Daskalakis G, Lymberopoulos
E, Stefanidis K, Papantoniou N and Antsaklis A: The role of
three-dimensional imaging in the investigation of IUD malposition.
Bratisl Lek Listy. 110:174–177. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Moschos E and Twickler DM: Does the type
of intrauterine device affect conspicuity on 2D and 3D ultrasound?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196:1439–1443. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Shipp TD, Bromley B and Benacerraf BR: The
width of the uterine cavity is narrower in patients with an
embedded intrauterine device (IUD) compared to a normally
positioned IUD. J Ultrasound Med. 29:1453–1456. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Salim R, Lee C, Davies A, Jolaoso B,
Ofuasia E and Jurkovic D: A comparative study of three-dimensional
saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for
the classification of submucous fibroids. Hum Reprod. 20:253–257.
2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Lee C, Salim R, Ofili-Yebovi D, Yazbek J,
Davies A and Jurkovic D: Reproducibility of the measurement of
submucous fibroid protrusion into the uterine cavity using
three-dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol. 28:837–841. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Mavrelos D, Naftalin J, Hoo W, Ben-Nagi J,
Holland T and Jurkovic D: Preoperative assessment of submucous
fibroids by three-dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 38:350–354. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sørensen
JS, Ledertoug S and Olesen F: Magnetic resonance imaging and
transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Fertility Steril. 76:588–594. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A,
Szabolcs B, Romanini ME, Zupi E and Arduini D: Adenomyosis:
Three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and
correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 37:471–479.
2011.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Naftalin J and Jurkovic D: The
endometrial-myometrial junction: A fresh look at a busy crossing.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34:1–11. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Timmerman D, Verguts J, Konstantinovic ML,
Moerman P, van Schoubroeck D, Deprest J and van Huffel S: The
pedicle artery sign based on sonography with color Doppler imaging
can replace second-stage tests in women with abnormal vaginal
bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 22:166–171. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
