|
1
|
European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM)‡
for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
(ESHRE). Wyns C, Bergh C, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS,
Motrenko T, Rugescu I, Smeenk J, Tandler-Schneider A, et al: ART in
Europe, 2016: Results generated from European registries by ESHRE.
Hum Reprod Open. 2020(hoaa032)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wu D, Gao SY, You YP,
Yang TB and Wang H: Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy
outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro
fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A systematic review
and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 295:285–301.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D and
Keirse MJ: Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted
conception: A systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ.
328(261)2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson
HB, Jeng G and Wilcox LS: Low and very low birth weight in infants
conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J
Med. 346:731–737. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S and Matsuda Y:
Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies
may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility
rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure
used. Fertil Steril. 98:922–928. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Marino JL, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Rumbold
A, Whitrow MJ, Giles LC and Davies MJ: Perinatal outcomes by mode
of assisted conception and sub-fertility in an Australian data
linkage cohort. PLoS One. 9(e80398)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Jaques AM, Amor DJ, Baker HW, Healy DL,
Ukoumunne OC, Breheny S, Garrett C and Halliday JL: Adverse
obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving
without assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril.
94:2674–2679. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Lei LL, Lan YL, Wang SY, Feng W and Zhai
ZJ: Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following
assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective cohort study.
Chin Med J (Engl). 132:2408–2416. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Opdahl S, Henningsen AA, Tiitinen A, Bergh
C, Pinborg A, Romundstad PR, Wennerholm UB, Gissler M, Skjærven R
and Romundstad LB: Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies
following assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study from the
CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod. 30:1724–1731. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Thomopoulos C, Tsioufis C, Michalopoulou
H, Makris T, Papademetriou V and Stefanadis C: Assisted
reproductive technology and pregnancy-related hypertensive
complications: A systematic review. J Hum Hypertens. 27:148–157.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Eisenberg ML, Callan C,
Botting BJ, Pacey A, Sutcliffe AG and Baker VL: In vitro
fertilization and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy:
Associations with treatment parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
222:350.e1–350.e13. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H and Gao S:
Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related
complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton
pregnancies: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril.
105:73–85.e1, 6. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Zhu L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang R, Wu Y,
Huang Y, Liu F, Li M, Sun S, Xing L, et al: Maternal and live-birth
outcomes of pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology:
A retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 6(35141)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW and Croughan
MS: Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro
fertilization: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 103:551–563.
2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Karami M, Jenabi E and Fereidooni B: The
association of placenta previa and assisted reproductive
techniques: A meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
31:1940–1947. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Raja EA, Shetty A,
Hamilton M and Bhattacharya S: Is frozen embryo transfer better for
mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a
definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update. 24:35–58. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Litzky JF, Boulet SL, Esfandiari N, Zhang
Y, Kissin DM, Theiler RN and Marsit CJ: Effect of frozen/thawed
embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight
rates in US singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
218:433.e1–433.e10. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Orvieto R, Kirshenbaum M and Gleicher N:
Is embryo cryopreservation causing macrosomia-and what else? Front
Endocrinol (Lausanne). 11(19)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Avnon T, Ovental A and Many A: Twin versus
singleton pregnancy in women ≥ 45 years of age: Comparison of
maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
34:201–206. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM,
Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou J, Chapman MG and Venetis CA: Are singleton
pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated
with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART
singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG.
126:209–218. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Bosdou JK, Anagnostis P, Goulis DG, Lainas
GT, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF and Kolibianakis EM: Risk of
gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton
pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 26:514–544. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Bhattacharya S and Kamath MS: Reducing
multiple births in assisted reproduction technology. Best Pract Res
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 28:191–199. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A,
Wennerholm UB and Bergh C: Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing
women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton
pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy. Fertil
Steril. 99:731–737. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Gupta R, Sardana P, Arora P, Banker J,
Shah S and Banker M: Maternal and neonatal complications in twin
deliveries as compared to singleton deliveries following in vitro
fertilization. J Hum Reprod Sci. 13:56–64. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Van Heesch MM, Evers JL, Dumoulin JC, van
der Hoeven MA, van Beijsterveldt CE, Bonsel GJ, Dykgraaf RH, van
Goudoever JB, Koopman-Esseboom C, Nelen WL, et al: A comparison of
perinatal outcomes in singletons and multiples born after in vitro
fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection stratified for
neonatal risk criteria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 93:277–286.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen
P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA and Chan A: Reproductive technologies
and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 366:1803–1813.
2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Kahveci B, Melekoglu R, Evruke IC and
Cetin C: The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes
in nulliparous singleton pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
18(343)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Zollner U and Dietl J: Perinatal risks
after IVF and ICSI. J Perinat Med. 41:17–22. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Wennberg AL, Opdahl S, Bergh C, Henningsen
AK, Gissler M, Romundstad LB, Pinborg A, Tiitinen A, Skjærven R and
Wennerholm UB: Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal
outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril.
106:1142–1149.e14. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
De Geyter C: Single embryo transfer in all
infertile couples treated with assisted reproduction produces
excellent results and avoids multiple births. Swiss Med Wkly.
151(w20499)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Klenov VE, Boulet SL, Mejia RB, Kissin DM,
Munch E, Mancuso A and Van Voorhis BJ: Live birth and multiple
birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor
oocytes: A comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo
transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 35:1657–1664. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Bergh C, Kamath MS, Wang R and Lensen S:
Strategies to reduce multiple pregnancies during medically assisted
reproduction. Fertil Steril. 114:673–679. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Kamath MS, Mascarenhas M, Kirubakaran R
and Bhattacharya S: Number of embryos for transfer following in
vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 8(CD003416)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS,
Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, Scaravelli G, Smeenk J, Vidakovic S
and Goossens V: European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the
European society of human reproduction and embryology (ESHRE). ART
in Europe, 2015: Results generated from European registries by
ESHRE. Hum Reprod Open. 2020(hoz038)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Kalinderis M, Kalinderi K, Srivastava G
and Homburg R: When should we freeze embryos? current data for
fresh and frozen embryo replacement IVF cycles. Reprod Sci.
28:3061–3072. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton
M and Bhattacharya S: Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton
pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus
fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril.
98:368–377.e1-e9. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
Maheshwari A, Raja EA and Bhattacharya S:
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed
frozen embryo transfer: An analysis of 112,432 singleton
pregnancies recorded in the human fertilisation and embryology
authority anonymized dataset. Fertil Steril. 106:1703–1708.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC and
Humaidan P: Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in
IVF/ICSI cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis of
reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 25:2–14. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M and Geber S:
Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo
transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist
Reprod. 22:253–260. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
