|
1
|
Jin ZK, Yang Y, Xu CX, Yang B, Lammi MJ,
Chang YH, Ling M, Guo X and Wang XQ: Outcomes of total knee
arthroplasty in the adult Kashin-Beck disease with severe
osteoarthritis. Int Orthop. 43:323–331. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Gao J, Xing D, Dong S and Lin J: The
primary total knee arthroplasty: A global analysis. J Orthop Surg
Res. 15(190)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
George LK, Hu L and Sloan FA: The effects
of total knee arthroplasty on physical functioning and health among
the under age 65 population. Value Health. 17:605–610.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, Wright RW
and Clohisy JC: What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in
young patients?: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 469:574–583. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Nam D, Nunley RM and Barrack RL: Patient
dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: A growing
concern? Bone Joint J. 96-B (11 Suppl A):S96–S100. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Parvizi J, Nunley RM, Berend KR, Lombardi
AV Jr, Ruh EL, Clohisy JC, Hamilton WG, Della Valle CJ and Barrack
RL: High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total
knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472:133–137.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Dalury DF: Cementless total knee
arthroplasty: Current concepts review. Bone Joint J. 98-B:867–873.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Meneghini RM and Hanssen AD: Cementless
fixation in total knee arthroplasty: Past, present, and future. J
Knee Surg. 21:307–314. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Prudhon JL and Verdier R: Cemented or
cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200
cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years. SICOT J.
3(70)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F and Halpern
M: Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in
the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
89:780–785. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Effenberger H, Berka J, Hilzensauer G,
Ramsauer T, Dorn U and Kisslinger E: Miller-Galante total knee
arthroplasty: The importance of material and design on the revision
rate. Int Orthop. 25:378–381. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Barden RM,
Sheinkop MB, Jacobs JJ and Galante JO: Long-term followup of the
Miller-Galante total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
58–67. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Losina E and Katz JN: Total knee
arthroplasty on the rise in younger patients: Are we sure that past
performance will guarantee future success? Arthritis Rheum.
64:339–341. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Yau W, Chiu K and Tang W: How precise is
the determination of rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis
in total knee arthroplasty: An in vivo study. J Arthroplasty.
22:1042–1048. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR and
Font-Rodriguez DE: Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal
femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 35-46,
1996. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00006.
|
|
16
|
Benjamin J: Determining femoral component
position using CAS and measured resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
466:2745–2750. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM and
Lotke PA: Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee
arthroplasty: Reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty.
16:301–305. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Uivaraseanu B, Bungau S, Tit DM, Behl T,
Maghiar TA, Maghiar O, Pantis C, Zaha DC and Patrascu JM:
Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in
knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young
patients. Exp Ther Med. 21(541)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Søballe K, Hansen E, Brockstedt-Rasmussen
H and Bünger C: Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to
bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:270–278.
1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Tai C and Cross M: Five-to 12-year
follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee
replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
88:1158–1163. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Toksvig-Larsen S, Jorn LP, Ryd L and
Lindstrand A: Hydroxyapatite-enhanced tibial prosthetic fixation.
Clin Orthop Relat Res: 192-200, 2000. doi:
10.1097/00003086-200001000-00018.
|
|
22
|
Cross M and Parish E: A
hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: Prospective analysis
of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87:1073–1076.
2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Epinette JA and Manley M:
Hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: Clinical experience
at 10 to 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89:34–38. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Voigt JD and Mosier M: Hydroxyapatite (HA)
coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial
components in primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop.
82:448–459. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Dunbar MJ, Wilson DAJ, Hennigar A,
Amirault J and Gross M: Fixation of a trabecular metal knee
arthroplasty component. A prospective randomized study. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 91:1578–1586. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Henricson A, Linder L and Nilsson KG: A
trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in
patients younger than 60 years: A two-year
radiostereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
90:1585–1593. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Harrison AK, Gioe TJ, Simonelli C, Tatman
PJ and Schoeller MC: Do porous tantalum implants help preserve
bone?: Evaluation of tibial bone density surrounding tantalum
tibial implants in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468:2739–2745.
2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Meneghini RM and de Beaubien BC: Early
failure of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components.
J Arthroplasty. 28:1505–1508. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Tigani D, Sabbioni G and Raimondi A: Early
aseptic loosening of a porous tantalum knee prosthesis. Chir Organi
Mov. 93:187–191. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Ghalayini S and McLauchlan G: Early
results of a trabecular metal tibial component in total knee
replacement. Orthop Proc Bri Editorial Soc Bone Joint Surg.
87B(145)2005.
|
|
31
|
Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Ikebuchi
M, Inori F and Takaoka K: Comparison of bone mineral density
between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty
components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92:700–706. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Pulido L, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Stuart
MJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Hanssen AD and Pagnano MW: The Mark Coventry
Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable
in primary total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 473:34–42. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Kato K, Ochiai S, Yamamoto A, Daigo Y,
Honma K, Matano S and Omori K: Novel multilayer Ti foam with
cortical bone strength and cytocompatibility. Acta Biomater.
9:5802–5809. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Martinez E, Medina F
and Wicker RB: Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive
manufacturing using electron beam melting. Int J Biomater.
2012(245727)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M
and Bozic KJ: Future young patient demand for primary and revision
joint replacement: National projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 467:2606–2612. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Lass R, Kubista B, Holinka J, Pfeiffer M,
Schuller S, Stenicka S, Windhager R and Giurea A: Comparison of
cementless and hybrid cemented total knee arthroplasty.
Orthopedics. 36:e420–e427. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
Campi S, Pandit H, Hooper G, Snell D,
Jenkins C, Dodd CAF, Maxwell R and Murray DW: Ten-year survival and
seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental
knee replacement: A prospective consecutive series of our first
1000 cases. Knee. 25:1231–1237. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Zhou K, Yu H, Li J, Wang H, Zhou Z and Pei
F: No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes
between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total
knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J
Surg. 53:312–319. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Salem HS, Tarazi JM, Ehiorobo JO, Marchand
KB, Mathew KK, Sodhi N and Mont MA: Cementless fixation for total
knee arthroplasty in various patient populations: A literature
review. J Knee Surg. 33:848–855. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Wilson HA, Middleton R, Abram SGF, Smith
S, Alvand A, Jackson WF, Bottomley N, Hopewell S and Price AJ:
Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee
replacement: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ.
364(l352)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
41
|
Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A and Murray
DW: Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee
arthroplasty: A study of 14 076 matched patients from the National
Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 97-B:793–801.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Hasan S, van Hamersveld KT, Marang-van de
Mheen PJ, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG and Toksvig-Larsen S: Migration
of a novel 3D-printed cementless versus a cemented total knee
arthroplasty: Two-year results of a randomized controlled trial
using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J. 102:1016–1024.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Chen C and Li R: Cementless versus
cemented total knee arthroplasty in young patients: A meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res.
14(262)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
44
|
van der List JP, Sheng DL, Kleeblad LJ,
Chawla H and Pearle AD: Outcomes of cementless unicompartmental and
total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Knee. 24:497–507.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
Pandit H, Hamilton T, Jenkins C, Mellon S,
Dodd C and Murray D: The clinical outcome of minimally invasive
Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 15-year
follow-up of 1000 UKAs. Bone Joint J. 97-B:1493–1499.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
46
|
Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M,
Gregg P and Deehan D: Center and surgeon volume influence the
revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: An analysis
of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 95:702–709. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
47
|
Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Havelin
LI and Furnes O: Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee
arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals: Data from 5,791 cases in the
Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 85:342–347. 2014.
|
|
48
|
Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU and
Weatherly GC: The optimum pore size for the fixation of
porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 263–270. 1980.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
49
|
Cameron HU, Pilliar RM and Macnab I: The
effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed
Mater Res. 7:301–311. 1973.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
50
|
Ponziani L, Di Caprio F and Meringolo R:
Cementless knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed. 88:11–18.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
51
|
Commitee NS: National Joint Registry for
England and Wales: 8th annual report. Hemel Hempstead, UK,
2011.
|
|
52
|
Sundberg M, Lidgren L, Dahl A and
Robertson O: The Swedish knee arthroplasty register-Annual report,
2011.
|
|
53
|
Australian Orthopaedic Association
National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2009, 2011.
|
|
54
|
Rothwell A, Hobbs T and Frampton C: New
Zealand orthopaedic association: New Zealand Joint Registry: Twelve
year report January 1999 to December 2010, 2011.
|
|
55
|
Baker PN, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Esler CN and
Gregg PJ: A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus
cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year
survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89:1608–1614.
2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
56
|
van Hamersveld KT, Marang-van de Mheen PJ,
Tsonaka R, Valstar ER and Toksvig-Larsen S: Fixation and clinical
outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated versus cemented total
knee arthroplasty: Five-year follow-up of a randomised controlled
trial using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Bone Joint J.
99-B:1467–1476. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
57
|
Ranawat CS, Meftah M, Windsor EN and
Ranawat AS: Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: Down
the boulevard of broken dreams-affirms. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94
(11 Suppl A):S82–S84. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
58
|
Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Schoones JW,
Middeldorp S, Valstar ER and Nelissen RG: RSA prediction of high
failure rate for the uncoated Interax TKA confirmed by
meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 83:142–147. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
59
|
Carlsson Å, Björkman A, Besjakov J and
Önsten I: Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than
cementless fixation: A randomized radiostereometric study comparing
porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components
over 5 years. Acta Orthop. 76:362–369. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
60
|
Mont MA, Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH,
Maheshwari A and Harwin SF: Long-term implant survivorship of
cementless total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the
literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 27:369–376.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
61
|
Beaupré LA, Al-Yamani M, Huckell JR and
Johnston DW: Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with
cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A
randomized trial of outcomes at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
89:2204–2211. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
62
|
Bercovy M, Beldame J, Lefebvre B and Duron
A: A prospective clinical and radiological study comparing
hydroxyapatite-coated with cemented tibial components in total knee
replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94:497–503. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
63
|
Fricka KB, Sritulanondha S and McAsey CJ:
To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized
Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty
(TKA). J Arthroplasty. 30 (9 Suppl):55–58. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
64
|
Gao F, Henricson A and Nilsson KG:
Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the
NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years:
A prospective randomised controlled RSA study. Knee. 16:200–206.
2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
65
|
Duffy GP, Berry DJ and Rand JA: Cement
versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop
Relat Res: 66-72, 1998. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00011.
|
|
66
|
Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira
Neto Ode A, Queiroz AA and Navarro RD: Cemented, cementless or
hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for
osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 10(CD006193)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
67
|
Wang K, Sun H, Zhang K, Li S, Wu G, Zhou J
and Sun X: Better outcomes are associated with cementless fixation
in primary total knee arthroplasty in young patients: A systematic
review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine
(Baltimore). 99(e18750)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
68
|
Prasad AK, Tan JHS, Hanna SA,
Dawson-Bowling S and Bedair HS: Cemented vs. cementless fixation in
primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 5:793–798. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
69
|
Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W and Mehle
S: Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: Survival in a community
registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 464:83–87. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
70
|
Mont MA, Lee CW, Sheldon M, Lennon WC and
Hungerford DS: Total knee arthroplasty in patients. J Arthroplasty.
17:538–543. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
71
|
Buechel FF Sr: Long-term followup after
mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res:
40-50, 2002. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00008.
|
|
72
|
Hardeman F, Vandenneucker H, Van Lauwe J
and Bellemans J: Cementless total knee arthroplasty with Profix: A
8-to 10-year follow-up study. Knee. 13:419–421. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
73
|
Ritter MA and Meneghini RM: Twenty-year
survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee
arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 25:507–513. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
74
|
Hofmann AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP and
Camargo MP: Ten-to 14-year clinical followup of the cementless
Natural Knee system. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 85-94, 2001. doi:
10.1097/00003086-200107000-00013.
|
|
75
|
Whiteside LA: Choosing your implant:
Cementless, patella sparing and posterior cruciate ligament
retaining. J Arthroplasty. 20 (4 Suppl 2):S10–S11. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
76
|
Watanabe H, Akizuki S and Takizawa T:
Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee
arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years
after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86:824–829. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
