Open Access

Risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants

  • Authors:
    • Hai-Xin Li
    • Cai-Jie Gao
    • Shan Cheng
    • Zhi-Lei Mao
    • Huai-Yan Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 21, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9668
  • Article Number: 237
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Premature infants are prone to dyspnea after birth due to immature development, and some infants require respiratory assistance. However, the risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants are rarely reported. The present study enrolled 3,394 premature infants (665 infants had been provided with respiratory assistance and 2,729 had not used respiratory assistance) to retrospectively analyze the risk factors associated with respiratory aid. The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that placental abnormality [odds ratio (OR)=1.284; P=0.048], the male sex (OR=0.696; P=0.001), delivery via cesarean section (OR=1.538; P<0.001), low 1‑min Apgar score (OR=0.727; P<0.001), low birth weight (OR=0.999; P=0.005) and low gestational age (OR=0.616; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants. Overall, a number of risk factors, including placental abnormality, cesarean section, low 1‑min Apgar score, low birth weight and small gestational age, were identified for respiratory assistance in premature infants. By conducting a risk assessment of risk factors at birth and using this information to provide timely respiratory assistance, the survival rates of premature infants may increase.

Introduction

The prevalence of premature delivery is on the rise worldwide, and in 2019 it was estimated that premature birth accounted for 10.6% of all live births (1). With economic development and an increase in medical knowledge, the survival rate of premature infants is increasing, reaching >90%, and the survival rate of infants with an extremely low birth weight (ELBW) with gestational age <28 weeks increased from 0 to 35-70% in high-income countries during the previous two decades (1-4). However, premature infants that survive may develop detrimental conditions, such as neurodevelopmental disabilities and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (5).

The pulmonary cellular structure, thoracic structure and muscle strength mature in the last trimester (6), and metabolic substances that are important for effective breathing, such as pulmonary surfactant and antioxidant enzyme, are highly reserved in the last trimester (7). Therefore, pulmonary disease is a major cause of mortality in premature infants, especially in extremely premature infants (8). These infants require respiratory assistance to clear lung fluid, aerate the lungs and establish a consistent functional residual capacity to ensure gas exchange (9). Prior to the 1970s, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) was the most common cause of mortality in premature infants until the emergence of assisted ventilation, which resulted in a significant increase in the survival rate of patients with the disease (10). Respiratory assistance is also an important treatment for other complications that are common in premature infants, including BPD and respiratory failure (8,11,12).

Respiratory assistance includes mechanical ventilation, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. A previous study has revealed that extremely preterm births require positive pressure ventilation if infants have spontaneous breathing and the use of nasal or mask CPAP is recommended (13). CPAP failure is defined as hypoxia, severe respiratory distress or apnea when FiO2 >0.6 and pCO2 >65 mmHg (14-16), and often requires mechanical ventilation. Due to the underdeveloped body function and organ development of premature infants who exhibit hypoimmunity, long-term respiratory assistance may also result in a number of complications. For example, an Australian study revealed that 24% of 500 pediatric patients who used respiratory assistance developed complications, including croup, epiglottitis, lung atelectasis, infection and others (17). Despite the continuous advancement of medical care, ventilator-associated pneumonia, infection and retinopathy of prematurity occur occasionally, resulting in prolonged hospital stay of newborns, of which severe cases can be life-threatening (1,18,19). Therefore, investigating the risk factors of respiratory assistance in premature infants may reduce the use of ventilators and the incidence of complications via targeted pregnancy and prenatal education and can strengthen medical skills. Furthermore, using the correct personalized respiratory management in a timely manner (by determining whether premature infants require respiratory assistance as early as possible) will be of great significance in improving survival rates of premature infants. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few relevant studies at present.

The current study retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the use of ventilators in the treatment of premature infants to investigate risk factors for respiratory assistance. The results of the current study may provide evidence for the clinical early judgment of respiratory assistance contributing to an increase in survival rate of premature infants by effectively managing risk factors of respiratory assistance.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The subjects were selected from 3,578 premature infants ranging from 24 to 36 week of gestational age (mean, 33.73; SD, 2.29). They were born in Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Changzhou, China) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 and were hospitalized in the neonatology department. In total, 56.48% of participants were male, 43.46% were female and 0.06% were unknown. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Born in Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care hospital; ii) gestational week of delivery <37 weeks. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients with hospice care; ii) missing data on maternal pregnancy period or perinatal period; iii) pediatrics who were readmitted for various reasons after recovery from neonatology department; and iv) congenital abnormalities including fatal fetal anomaly, such as Edwards syndrome, anencephaly, Patau Syndrome, Renal Agenesis/Potter Syndrome, triploidy, serious open spina bifida, severe encephalocele, monocardian, severe fatal achondroplasia and severe cleft lip and palate.

The included subjects were divided into two groups: The respiratory assistance group, which had a history of ventilator use during neonatal hospitalization, including invasive ventilator, non-invasive ventilator and high-frequency ventilation; and the no ventilator use group, of which patients had no history of ventilator use during hospitalization.

The indications for non-invasive ventilation were: i) Early prophylactic application in the delivery room for premature infants with spontaneous breathing (gestational age 25-28 weeks); ii) preterm infants at high risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); iii) when the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) >0.3, arterial oxygen saturations (PaO2) <50 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kpa) or transcutaneous oxygen saturations (TcSO2) <90%; iv) premature infant apnea; v) the condition of children with RDS was stable following pulmonary surfactant treatment, and the tracheal tube was removed; and vi) after conventional mechanical ventilation or high-frequency ventilation was removed, there were obvious tri-retraction signs and/or respiratory distress (20-22).

The indications of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) were as follows: i) Frequent apnea, with no effect after medication or CPAP intervention; ii) children with RDS who require PS treatment; iii) FiO2 >0.6-0.7, PaO2 <50-60 mmHg or TcSO2 <85% (except the cyanotic congenital heart disease); iv) PaCO2 >60-65 mmHg, accompanied by persistent acidosis (pH <7.20); and v) newborns under general anesthesia (22).

High-frequency ventilation is often used for the following situations (22-25): i) Pulmonary air leak syndromes, including pneumothorax, interstitial emphysema or bronchopleural fistula; ii) some congenital diseases, such as diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary dysplasia and severe thoracic deformity; iii) persistent pulmonary hypertension, especially for those requiring inhalation of NO; iv) lung diseases with severe non-uniform changes, such as meconium inhalation syndrome and severe pneumonia; and v) premature infant RDS, and can be used as the first choice after CMV failure.

The current study protocol followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (26) and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Changzhou Women and Children Health Care Hospital.

Patient information collection

Using the hospital's information system, a retrospective study was conducted to collect factors that may be associated with the use of ventilators in 3,578 patients. The data are anonymous, and the requirement for informed consent was therefore waived. Data included the general information and complication condition of mothers during the maternal pregnancy period, including the mothers' hospital number, age, polyembryony or not, gravidity and parity, the complications of pregnancy and delivery (such as anemia, hypertension, diabetes, infection, scarred uterus, cholestasis, hypoproteinemia, thrombocytopenia, uterine fibroid and hypothyroidism), whether the fetal position, placenta and umbilical cord were abnormal and whether the preterm birth was in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Furthermore, data regarding the condition of pediatric patients during the perinatal period was collected, and included the following: Whether there was premature rupture of membranes, the mode of delivery, the gestational age (weeks), 1-min and 5-min Apgar score (27), sex, birth weight and whether a ventilator was used. After removing unqualified cases, 3,394 subjects were included, of which 19.59% (665/3,394) required a ventilator (Fig. 1).

Statistical analysis

A total of 3,394 patients were included in the statistical analysis, 2,729 cases did not require ventilator use and 665 cases used a ventilator. Continuous variables were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or median (percentile 25 to percentile 75). When appropriate, continuous variables, including maternal age, birth weight and gestational age, were compared using unpaired Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Pregnancy times, 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The remaining categorical variables were summarized using frequency and percentage and compared using χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. For all possible determinants of treatment with a ventilator or not, univariate logistic regression analysis was performed. All variables with a P<0.1 (defined ‘a priori’) were considered relevant and included into the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to define the factors that were independently associated with using a ventilator. Statistical analyses were performed with R version 3.4.1 (www.R-project.org). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics

The results identified that among the factors during the maternal pregnancy period, there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of maternal anemia, abnormal fetal position, pregnancy with diabetes, placental abnormality, maternal infection, abnormality of umbilical cord, cholestasis during the maternal pregnancy period and neonates conceived by IVF (Table I). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of maternal hypertension, scarred uterus, hypothyroidism and thrombocytopenia (Table I). Among the perinatal factors, the proportion of male infants who received ventilator rescue was significantly higher compared with the number of female infants. Furthermore, the patients who received ventilator rescue exhibited a lower 1-min and 5-min Apgar score, lower birth weight and smaller gestational age compared with those who did not receive ventilator treatment. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of whether the weight was suitable for gestational age (SGA/AGA/LGA), the mole of delivery (eutocia/caesarean section), pregnancy times, and premature rupture of membranes.

Table I

Demographics and clinical characteristics in premature babies with or without ventilator use.

Table I

Demographics and clinical characteristics in premature babies with or without ventilator use.

A, Maternal pregnancy period
FactorWithout ventilator, n=2,729With ventilator, n=665P-value
Anemia  0.001b
     Yes1,234347 
     No1,495318 
Hypertension  0.118
     Yes545115 
     No2,184550 
Abnormal fetal position  0.045a
     Yes441129 
     No2,288536 
Diabetes  0.018a
     Yes36867 
     No2,361598 
Placental abnormality   <0.001b
     Yes544234 
     No2,185431 
Infection   <0.001b
     Yes603219 
     No2,126446 
Abnormality of umbilical cord  0.004b
     Yes42374 
     No2,306591 
Scarred uterus  0.243
     Yes27477 
     No2,455588 
Cholestasis  0.004b
     Yes30549 
     No2,424616 
Hypoproteinemia  0.776
     Yes26968 
     No2,460597 
Conceived by IVF  0.013a
     Yes36465 
     No2,365600 
Thrombocytopenia  0.405
     Yes7314 
     No2,656651 
Uterine fibroid  0.786
     Yes5314 
     No2,676651 
Hypothyroidism  0.573
     Yes4112 
     No2,688653 
Maternal age (years)c28.18±4.9428.42±5.070.266
B, Perinatal period
FactorWithout ventilator, n=2,729With ventilator, n=665P-value
Age (days)c1.12±0.861.10±0.770.571
Sex, female/male   <0.001b
     Female1,231250 
     Male1,498415 
AGA or not  0.007b
     SGA32172 
     AGA2,328587 
     LGA816 
Mode of delivery   <0.001b
     Eutocia1,142329 
     Cesarean1,587336 
1-min Apgar scored8 (8-9)c7 (6-8) <0.001b
5-min Apgar scored8 (8-9)c8 (7-8) <0.001b
Monocyesis  0.005b
     Yes1,949511 
     No780154 
Pregnancy times  0.010a
     11,208262 
     2710176 
     3403108 
     ≥4408119 
Parity  0.767
     Primiparous1,265304 
     Multiparous1,464361 
Birth weight (g)c2339.83±473.061735.64±523.24 <0.001b
Gestational age (weeks)c34.29±1.6231.24±2.59 <0.001b
Premature rupture of membrane  0.001b
     Yes1124229 
     No1605436 

[i] aP<0.05;

[ii] bP<0.01;

[iii] cvalues are presented as mean (standard deviation);

[iv] dvalues are presented as median (range). SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age.

Risk factors associated with preterm infants who used ventilation

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the risk factors for respiratory assistance in pediatric patients. The results demonstrated that placental abnormality, being male, cesarean section, low 1-min Apgar score, low birth weight and small gestational age were the independent risk factors for using respiratory assistance in rescue of premature infants (Table II).

Table II

Analysis of risk factors for using a ventilator in preterm infants.

Table II

Analysis of risk factors for using a ventilator in preterm infants.

A, Maternal pregnancy period
 Univariate regression analysisMultivariate regression analysis
VariablesOR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
Anemia, yes/no1.3221.116-1.5660.001b1.0210.819-1.2730.854
Hypertension, yes/no0.8380.671-1.0460.118   
Abnormal fetal position, yes/no1.2491.005-1.5520.045a0.7780.581-1.0420.092
Diabetes, yes/no0.7190.546-0.9470.019a0.8640.613-1.2170.402
Placental abnormality, yes/no2.1811.813-2.623 <0.001b1.2841.002-1.6460.048a
Infection, yes/no1.7311.438-2.083 <0.001b1.1510.901-1.4710.259
Abnormality of umbilical cord, yes/no0.6830.525-0.8880.004b0.8320.605-1.1450.259
Scarred uterus, yes/no1.1730.897-1.5340.243   
Cholestasis, yes/no0.6320.462-0.8660.004b0.9920.675-1.4570.967
Hypoproteinemia, yes/no1.0420.787-1.3790.776   
Conceived by IVF, yes/no0.7040.533-0.9300.014a0.7890.528-1.1810.249
Thrombocytopenia, yes/no0.7820.439-1.3950.406   
Uterine fibroid, yes/no1.0860.599-1.9690.786   
Hypothyroidism, yes/no1.2050.630-2.3050.574   
Maternal age (years)1.0100.993-1.0270.258   
B, Perinatal period
 Univariate regression analysisMultivariate regression analysis
VariablesOR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
Sex, female/male0.7330.616-0.872 <0.001b0.6960.558-0.8690.001b
Gestational age, SGA/AGA0.8920.680-1.1700.410.8870.579-1.3560.579
Gestational age, LGA/AGA0.2940.128-0.6670.004b1.1820.432-3.2350.745
Delivery method: Cesarean section/eutocia0.7350.620-0.871 <0.001b1.5381.197-1.977 <0.001b
1-min Apgar score0.4790.443-0.518 <0.001b0.7270.638-0.828 <0.001b
5-min Apgar score0.3000.261-0.343 <0.001b0.9080.740-1.1140.356
Polyembryony, yes/no0.7530.618-0.9180.005b0.7630.571-1.0180.066
Pregnancy times1.1051.024-1.1920.01a1.0050.911-1.1090.916
Parity, ≥2/11.0260.866-1.2160.767   
Birth weight (g)0.9970.997-0.998 <0.001b0.9990.999-1.0000.005b
Gestational age (weeks)0.5190.493-0.546 <0.001b0.6160.560-0.678 <0.001b
Premature rupture of membrane, yes/no0.7500.628-0.8950.001b0.9660.769-1.2140.769

[i] aP<0.05;

[ii] bP<0.01. OR, odds ration; CI, confidence interval; SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age.

Analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

The results from the multivariate regression analyses, which included birth weight, gestational age, 1-min Apgar, mode of delivery (cesarean section/vaginal delivery), sex and placental abnormality, were used to construct the ROC curve analysis that predicted the use of infant ventilator in preterm infants. The area under the curve of the prediction model constructed in the present study was 0.869 and the cut-off value was 0.212, which indicated that the prediction ability and discrimination of the model were generally effective (Fig. 2).

Discussion

Ventilator-assisted ventilation, which is an important treatment tool used in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), has developed rapidly and aided a number of premature infants (13). However, if respiratory assistance is delayed, the rescue outcomes for newborn patients whose conditions are continuously changing and difficult to predict may be unfavorable. The present study investigated the risk factors for the use of ventilation in advance, and whether it is possible to predict if preterm births will require ventilator support or not, which will determine whether the relevant equipment should be prepared and a pediatrician made available in order to rescue infants quickly and improve their chances of survival. In addition, the economic cost of treatment for premature infants is high, and with the improvement of medicine, more premature infants of decreased gestational ages survive, which increases this cost (28-30). Ventilator support involves a number of different pieces of equipment, medical workers and expenses, which can be reduced if the risk factors of ventilator support are managed effectively.

As an effective method to solve high-risk pregnancy, dystocia and other obstetric critical illness, the use of a cesarean section has been increasing each year, and in 2015, an estimated 29.7 million (21.1%) births globally were by CS, which represented almost a doubling in the proportion since 2000, when 16.0 million (12.1%) births were by CS (31). Although cesarean delivery can reduce the incidence of neonatal asphyxia and meconium inhalation, the risk of respiratory morbidity and the probability of admission into the NICU are significantly higher (32,33). Furthermore, previous studies have reported that cesarean section is a risk factor for respiratory diseases, such as respiratory distress syndrome (34-36), transient shortness of breath (37) and pulmonary hypertension (38), but few of these studies examine the association between ventilator use and cesarean section. In the present study, cesarean section was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for ventilator use.

Fetuses need to overcome the viscosity resistance, surface tension and tissue resistance of the lung fluid by accelerating their breathing rate after delivery, but fetuses delivered by cesarean section have significant restricted ventilatory dysfunction within 12 h of birth due to the lower tidal volume and minute ventilation volume compared with fetuses born via vaginal delivery (39). It has been previously suggested that the clearance of fetal lung fluid begins before birth, and neonates born via cesarean section without uterine contractions may have difficulty in removing fluid from their lungs, which can result in obstruction of ventilation (39). In addition, cesarean delivery makes infants more susceptible to NRDS and its accompanying increase in endothelin-1 levels, which may indirectly result in the occurrence of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of Newborn (38). Exposure of newborns delivered via caesarean section with the combined effect of these pathophysiological events may result in the occurrence of respiratory distress, hypoxia, acidosis and transition-delay (34). Therefore, the risk of respiratory diseases in premature infants delivered by cesarean section is higher, which suggests that the indications for elective cesarean section should be strictly controlled when selecting this method of delivery for premature infants in clinical practice, thus reducing their risk of ventilator use.

A previous study which measured the association between fetal sex and preterm birth in four original datasets found that premature birth is more common in males, with ~55% of premature births occurring in male infants (40). In addition, male infants exhibit a higher mortality rate compared with female infants born in the same gestation period (41). The results of the present study suggested that the male sex is an independent risk factor for ventilator use, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that the incidence of certain respiratory-related diseases in male newborns is significantly higher compared with that of female infants. For example, the incidence of NRDS in late-stage premature infants with different sexes is statistically different (male infants have a higher incidence compared with female infants) (42,43). Another study compared 130 premature male infants with 106 premature female infants and revealed that 60.8% of male infants required machinery ventilation support compared with only 46.2% of female infants, and the incidence of Chronic Lung Disease in male infants was higher compared with that of female infants (44). A previous study reported that after birth, male infants express less transforming growth factor (TGF)-β compared with female infants, and low levels of TGF-β are important indicators for predicting aerobic therapy, and at 36 weeks, male infants require a higher oxygen supply compared with female infants, which may cause premature male infants to lack oxygen, thus deepening and accelerating the breathing and aggravating damage to the respiratory system (45). Another previous study indicated that the carbon dioxide partial pressure of male infants is lower compared with female infants within 24 h after birth (46), while the low level of carbon dioxide partial pressure is associated with a low level of pulmonary surfactant, which may account for the sex difference in respiratory diseases. In addition, genetic factors may be responsible for sex differences. For example, a previous study revealed that allele 186 Asn and haploid 138 Asn-186 Asn are independent risk factors for RDS (47), and the association between allele 186 Asn and RDS was observed among male infants (48).

In the present study, it was revealed that placental abnormalities, such as placental abruption, placenta previa, placental adhesions and abnormal invasion placenta (AIP), may also increase the risk of ventilator use. Ahn et al (49) studied newborns born by 2,067 mothers with placenta previa and demonstrated that newborns whose anterior placenta previa in the second and third trimesters was correlated with NRDS. Furthermore, a previous study reported that AIP increased the risk of NRDS, and AIP cases required longer respiratory assistance compared with the control group, which was consistent with the results of the current study (50).

Apgar score includes heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability and color, which is the standard evaluation method of checking the health condition of the infant immediately after birth (27). This score has been used as a predictive index for neonatal mortality and morbidity, and for later neurologic or developmental disability (51). Numerous factors can influence Apgar score, such as maternal education and BMI, gestational age, pathological obstetrics, longer duration of the second stage of labor, neonatal weight and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (52). The present results suggested that 1-min Apgar score was a risk factor for respiratory assistance in premature infants, indicating that weight control in pregnant women, reduction of the preterm birth and other measures may reduce the use of ventilators.

As aforementioned, lung-related structures and metabolites mature in the last trimester, and thus premature infants often require respiratory assistance (6,7,53). In the current study, the ventilator utilization rates of gestational age <28 weeks, 28-31 weeks and 32-36 weeks were 89.58% (43/48), 65.38% (321/491) and 10.54% (301/2,855), respectively (data not shown); therefore, it was suggested that the younger the gestational age, the more ventilator support is required. Birth weight is also a risk factor for numerous respiratory diseases (54,55). To avoid these diseases, the pregnancy period should be extended as soon as possible, as well as ensuring good nutrition, and timely and regular antenatal visits during pregnancy. However, multiple sociodemographic, nutritional, biological and environmental factors can increase the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight (56,57). Therefore, methods for appropriate interventions to reduce the incidence of premature infants and low birth weight remain challenging.

With the increasing incidence of premature infants, how to reduce the use of ventilators, and use the ventilators correctly and timely is of great concern (1). However, there is limited research on the risk factors of ventilator use in premature infants worldwide, and there are few predictive models constructed for its use. The high-risk factors associated with respiratory assistance observed in the present study, including placental abnormality, being male, cesarean section, low 1-min Apgar score, low birth weight and small gestational age, may reduce the use of respiratory assistance by developing strategies to decrease these factors, and to clinically guide medical staff to identify pediatric patients with high risk factors, which will allow advanced preparation of the ventilator and ensure the availability of a pediatrician. Collectively, these actions could help to minimize the time of hypoxia within newborns, which will increase their survival.

There are some limitations of the present study that require discussion. Firstly, the current study used data from a single-center that has not been validated in other hospitals. Secondly, there was no in-depth discussion of the individual risk factors, such as a stratified analysis based on gestational age, which would provide more accurate risk factor analysis for the respiratory assistance of premature infants in different gestational age groups. This should be performed in future studies in order to provide a basis for preparing for the respiratory assistance of premature infants.

In conclusion, the present results suggested that cesarean section, male neonates, placental abnormality, low 1-min Apgar score, low birth weight and lower gestational age represented independent risk factors for the use of ventilators in premature infants. Thus, increased effort to reduce the use of ventilators and provide early detection of those requiring assistance should be performed for premature infants who require respiratory assistance to improve their survival rate and quality of life. Firstly, the indications for elective cesarean section should be strictly controlled when selecting cesarean section for premature infants in clinical practice. Secondly, ensuring nutrition and the timely and regular antenatal visits during pregnancy are important, as well as the pregnancy period should be extended as soon as possible Finally, for premature infants who have risk factors for using the ventilator, ventilator support such as the relevant equipment and personnel should be prepared in time to improve their chances of survival.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HXL, ZLM and HYW were study investigators and participated in study design, patient recruitment, acquisition of data, and/or analysis and interpretation of the findings. HXL, ZLM, HYW, CJG and SC contributed to data analysis, drafting and revising the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study protocol followed the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration revised in 2008 and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Changzhou Women and Children Health Care Hospital (Changzhou, China).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, Landoulsi S, Jampathong N, Kongwattanakul K, Laopaiboon M, et al: Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: A systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 7:e37–e46. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Ancel PY, Goffinet F, Kuhn P, Langer B, Matis J, Hernandorena X, Chabanier P, Joly-Pedespan L, Lecomte B, Vendittelli F, et al: EPIPAGE-2 Writing Group: Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: Results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. JAMA Pediatr. 169:230–238. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Simma B, Urlesberger B, Maurer-Fellbaum U, Wald M, Wald M, Weissensteiner M, Ehringer-Schetitska D, Berger A, Kurz H, et al: Austrian Preterm Outcome Study Group: Low mortality and short-term morbidity in very preterm infants in Austria 2011-2016. Acta Paediatr. 108:1419–1426. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Fellman V, Hellström-Westas L, Norman M, Westgren M, Källén K, Lagercrantz H, Marsál K, Serenius F and Wennergren M: EXPRESS Group. One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA. 301:2225–2233. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Platt MJ: Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health. 128:399–403. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Alphonse RS, Rajabali S and Thébaud B: Lung injury in preterm neonates: The role and therapeutic potential of stem cells. Antioxid Redox Signal. 17:1013–1040. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Vento M, Aguar M, Escobar J, Arduini A, Escrig R, Brugada M, Izquierdo I, Asensi MA, Sastre J, Saenz P, et al: Antenatal steroids and antioxidant enzyme activity in preterm infants: Influence of gender and timing. Antioxid Redox Signal. 11:2945–2955. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Cools F, Offringa M and Askie LM: Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants Cochrane Database Syst Rev: Mar 19, 2015 (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub4.

9 

Hillman NH, Kallapur SG and Jobe AH: Physiology of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life. Clin Perinatol. 39:769–783. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Owen LS, Manley BJ, Davis PG and Doyle LW: The evolution of modern respiratory care for preterm infants. Lancet. 389:1649–1659. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Spotswood N, Orsini F, Dargaville P, Marshall P, Schmidt P, Craven P, de Waal K, Simmer K, Gill A, Pillow J, et al: Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network: Association of center-specific patient volumes and early respiratory management practices with death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 210:63–68.e2. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Yang X, Xu PF, Shan L, Lang LG, Du L and Jia FY: Advances in respiratory assessment and treatment in children undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 21:94–99. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

13 

Vento M and Lista G: Managing preterm infants in the first minutes of life. Paediatr Respir Rev. 16:151–156. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Dunn MS, Kaempf J, de Klerk A, de Klerk R, Reilly M, Howard D, Ferrelli K, O'Conor J and Soll RF: Vermont Oxford Network DRM Study Group. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 128:e1069–e1076. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Tooley J and Dyke M: Randomized study of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 92:1170–1174. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Pfister RH and Soll RF: Initial respiratory support of preterm infants: The role of CPAP, the INSURE method, and noninvasive ventilation. Clin Perinatol. 39:459–481. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Rivera R and Tibballs J: Complications of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in infants and children. Crit Care Med. 20:193–199. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Iosifidis E, Pitsava G and Roilides E: Ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonates and children: A systematic analysis of diagnostic methods and prevention. Future Microbiol. 13:1431–1446. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Mao JB, Yu XT, Shen LJ, Wu MY, Lyu Z, Lao JM, Li HX, Wu HF and Chen YQ: Risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight infants by strictly controlling oxygen inhalation after birth. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 55:280–288. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

20 

Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Plavka R, Saugstad OD, Simeoni U, Speer CP, Vento M, et al: European Association of Perinatal Medicine: European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants - 2013 update. Neonatology. 103:353–368. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Committee on Fetus and NewbornAmerican Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics. 133:171–174. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Hansen AR and Stark AR (eds): Manual of Neonatal Care. 7th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, London, 2012.

23 

Rimensberger PC (ed): Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation. Springer, New York, NY, 2015.

24 

Donn SM and Sinha SK (eds): Manual of Neonatal Respiratory Care. 3rd edition. Springer, New York, NY, 2012.

25 

Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH and Siede BL: Assisted Ventilation of the Neonate. 5th edition. Elsevier, Louis, 2011.

26 

World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 310:2191–2194. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Apgar V: A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anest Anal. 32:260–267. 1953.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Rocha G, Soares P, Gonçalves A, Silva AI, Almeida D, Figueiredo S, Pissarra S, Costa S, Soares H, Flôr-de-Lima F, et al: Respiratory care for the ventilated neonate. Can Respir J: Aug 13, 2018 (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1155/2018/7472964.

29 

Lancet T: The Lancet. The global burden of preterm birth. Lancet. 374:1214. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Donda K, Vijayakanthi N, Dapaah-Siakwan F, Bhatt P, Rastogi D and Rastogi S: Trends in epidemiology and outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome in the United States. Pediatr Pulmonol. 54:405–414. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJ, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, et al: Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 392:1341–1348. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Ahimbisibwe A, Coughlin K and Eastabrook G: Respiratory morbidity in late preterm and term babies born by elective Caesarean sectio. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 41:1144–1149. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (Epub ahead of print). doi: org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.002.

33 

Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D and Lynch AM: Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 113:1231–1238. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Altman M, Vanpée M, Cnattingius S and Norman M: Risk factors for acute respiratory morbidity in moderately preterm infants. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 27:172–181. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Gerten KA, Coonrod DV, Bay RC and Chambliss LR: Cesarean delivery and respiratory distress syndrome: Does labor make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 193:1061–1064. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Berthelot-Ricou A, Lacroze V, Courbiere B, Guidicelli B, Gamerre M and Simeoni U: Respiratory distress syndrome after elective caesarean section in near term infants: A 5-year cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 26:176–182. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Rijal P and Shrestha M: Scenario of neonatal respiratory distress in Tertiary Hospital. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 16:131–135. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Babooa N, Shi WJ and Chen C: Factors relating caesarean section to persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. World J Pediatr. 13:517–527. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Dileep A, Khan NB and Sheikh SS: Comparing neonatal respiratory morbidity in neonates delivered at term by elective Caesarean section with and without dexamethasone: Retrospective cohort study. J Pak Med Assoc. 65:607–611. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Zeitlin J, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, De Mouzon J, Rivera L, Ancel PY, Blondel B and Kaminski M: Fetal sex and preterm birth: are males at greater risk? Hum Reprod. 17:2762–2768. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Kent AL, Wright IM and Abdel-Latif ME: New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Neonatal Intensive Care Units Audit Group. Mortality and adverse neurologic outcomes are greater in preterm male infants. Pediatrics. 129:124–131. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Anadkat JS, Kuzniewicz MW, Chaudhari BP, Cole FS and Hamvas A: Increased risk for respiratory distress among white, male, late preterm and term infants. J Perinatol. 32:780–785. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Ye W, Zhang T, Shu Y, Fang C, Xie L, Peng K and Liu C: The influence factors of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in Southern China: A case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 33:1678–1682. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Elsmén E, Hansen Pupp I and Hellström-Westas L: Preterm male infants need more initial respiratory and circulatory support than female infants. Acta Paediatr. 93:529–533. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Lecart C, Cayabyab R, Buckley S, Morrison J, Kwong KY, Warburton D, Ramanathan R, Jones CA and Minoo P: Bioactive transforming growth factor-beta in the lungs of extremely low birthweight neonates predicts the need for home oxygen supplementation. Biol Neonate. 77:217–223. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Dammann O, Allred EN, Kuban KC, van Marter LJ, Stewart JE, Pagano M and Leviton A: Development Epidemiology Network Investigators. Hypocarbia during the first 24 postnatal hours and white matter echolucencies in newborns < or = 28 weeks gestation. Pediatr Res. 49:388–393. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Fatahi N, Dalili H, Kalani M, Niknafs N, Shariat M, Tavakkoly-Bazzaz J, Amini E, Esmaeilnia Shirvani T, Hardani AK, Taheritafti R, et al: Association of SP-C gene codon 186 polymorphism (rs1124) and risk of RDS. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 30:2585–2589. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Lahti M, Marttila R and Hallman M: Surfactant protein C gene variation in the Finnish population - association with perinatal respiratory disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 12:312–320. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Ahn KH, Lee EH, Cho GJ, Hong SC, Oh MJ and Kim HJ: Anterior placenta previa in the mid-trimester of pregnancy as a risk factor for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. PLoS One. 13(e0207061)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Spillane NT, Zamudio S, Alvarez-Perez J, Andrews T, Nyirenda T, Alvarez M and Al-Khan A: Increased incidence of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates of mothers with abnormally invasive placentation. PLoS One. 13(e0201266)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Hegyi T, Carbone T, Anwar M, Ostfeld B, Hiatt M, Koons A, Pinto-Martin J and Paneth N: The apgar score and its components in the preterm infant. Pediatrics. 101:77–81. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Yang C, Chen X, Zu S and He F: Retrospective analysis of risk factors for low 1-minute Apgar scores in term neonates. Braz J Med Biol Res. 52(e9093)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Dargaville PA and Tingay DG: Lung protective ventilation in extremely preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 48:740–746. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Jiangsu Multicenter Study Collaborative Group for Breastmilk Feeding in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. [Clinical characteristics and risk factors of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Multicenter retrospective analysis]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 57:33–39. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Undela K, Mohammed BTS and Gurumurthy P: Impact of preterm birth and low birth weight on medical conditions, medication use and mortality among neonates: a prospective observational cohort studyWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP,2019,():.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-019-00239-1.

56 

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD and Romero R: Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 371:75–84. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Negandhi PH, Negandhi HN, Zodpey SP, Ughade SN and Biranjan JR: Risk factors for low birth weight in an Indian urban setting: A nested case control study. Asia Pac J Public Health. 26:461–469. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2021
Volume 21 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li H, Gao C, Cheng S, Mao Z and Wang H: Risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants. Exp Ther Med 21: 237, 2021
APA
Li, H., Gao, C., Cheng, S., Mao, Z., & Wang, H. (2021). Risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 21, 237. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9668
MLA
Li, H., Gao, C., Cheng, S., Mao, Z., Wang, H."Risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21.3 (2021): 237.
Chicago
Li, H., Gao, C., Cheng, S., Mao, Z., Wang, H."Risk factors for respiratory assistance in premature infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21, no. 3 (2021): 237. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9668