Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta‑analysis update

The present meta‑analysis was conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. The Embase, Pubmed Central, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical databases were searched between January 2009 and January 2022 to identify relevant studies. According to the search strategy, a total of 210 associated studies were retrieved and 16 were finally included. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for the data analysis. This study indicated that patients in the RSA group had significantly improved treatment outcomes compared with patients in the HA group, as assessed by Constant‑Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (95% CI, 1.69‑3.76; P<0.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (95% CI, 11.81‑24.88; P<0.001) and shoulder range of motion (ROM; 95% CI, 3.41‑9.07; P<0.001). However, the HA group was superior to the RSA group in terms of the Oxford Shoulder score (95% CI, 2.89‑11.11; P<0.001). There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and complications. Overall, for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in the elderly, the RSA group had improved postoperative ROM and functional scores compared with the HA group, without significant difference in the incidence of complications. However, HA remains a safe and reliable treatment option.